Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T23:26:11.155Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Britain and Ireland1

from Part II - Case Studies for Areal Linguistics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2017

By
Raymond Hickey
Edited by
Raymond Hickey
Raymond Hickey
Affiliation:
Universität Duisburg–Essen
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Areal Linguistics , pp. 270 - 303
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adger, David, 2010. Gaelic syntax. In Watson, Moray and Macleod, Michelle (eds), The Edinburgh Companion to the Gaelic Language, pp. 304–351. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Ahlqvist, Anders, 2010. Early Celtic and English. Australian Celtic Journal 9: 43–73.Google Scholar
Aitken, A. J., 1981. The Scottish vowel-length rule. In Benskin, Michael and Samuels, Michael (eds), So Meny People, Longages and Tonges: Philological Essays in Scots and Medieval English Presented to Angus McIntosh, pp. 131–157. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Anderwald, Lieselotte, 2002. Negation in Non-standard British English: Gaps, Regularizations and Asymmetries. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Anderwald, Lieselotte, 2009. The Morphology of English Dialects: Verb-formation in Non-standard English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan and Genee, Inge, 2002. English do: On the convergence of languages and linguists. English Language and Linguistics 6: 283–307.Google Scholar
Beal, Joan C., 1993. The grammar of Tyneside and Northumbrian English. In Milroy, and Milroy, (eds), pp. 187–213.Google Scholar
Beal, Joan C., 2008. English dialects in the North of England: Phonology. In Kortmann, and Upton, (eds), pp. 122–144.Google Scholar
Bliss, Alan J., 1972. Languages in contact: Some problems of Hiberno-English. Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy, Section C, 72: 63–82.Google Scholar
Braaten, Björn, 1967. Notes on continuous tenses in English. Norsk Tidskrift for Sprogvidenskap 21: 167–180.Google Scholar
Britain, David, 2012. English in England. In Hickey, (ed.), Areal Features of the Anglophone World, pp. 23–52.Google Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle, Corrigan, Karen, Holmberg, Anders, Honeybone, Patrick and Maguire, Warren, 2013. T-to-R and the Northern Subject Rule: Questionnaire-based spatial, social and structural linguistics. English Language and Linguistics 17 (1): 85–128.Google Scholar
Burchfield, Robert W., 1994a. Introduction. In Burchfield, (ed.), pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
Burchfield, Robert W. (ed.), 1994b. English in Britain and Overseas: Origins and Development. The Cambridge History of the English Language, vol. 5. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Butters, Ronald R., 2001. Grammatical structure. In Algeo, John (ed.), English in North America, pp. 325–339. The Cambridge History of the English Language, vol. 6. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Alistair, 1959. Old English Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Chadwick, Nora, 1963. The British or Celtic part in the population of England. In Angles and Britons (The O’Donnell Lectures), pp. 111–147. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
Claridge, Claudia and Kytö, Merja, 2010. Non-standard language in earlier English. In Hickey, Raymond (ed.), Varieties of English in Writing: The Written Word as Linguistic Evidence, pp. 15–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Clarke, Sandra, 2004. The legacy of British and Irish English in Newfoundland. In Hickey, Raymond (ed.), Legacies of Colonial English: Studies in Transported Dialects, pp. 242–261. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dal, Ingerid, 1952. Zur Entstehung des Englischen Participium Praesentis auf -ing. Norsk Tidskrift for Sprogvidenskap 16: 5–116.Google Scholar
Davies, Norman, 1999. The Isles: A History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Denison, David, 1985. The origins of periphrastic do: Ellegård and Visser reconsidered. In Eaton, Roger et al. (eds), Papers from the 4th International Conference of English Historical Linguistics, pp. 44–60. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Dobson, E. J., 1968. English Pronunciation 1500–1700, vol. 1: Survey of the Sources, vol. 2: Phonology, second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, Viv, 1993. The grammar of Southern British English. In Milroy, and Milroy, (eds), pp. 214–238.Google Scholar
Ekwall, Eilert, 1975. A History of Modern English Sounds and Morphology, translated by Ward, A.. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ellegård, Alvar, 1953. The Auxiliary Do: The Establishment and Regulation of its Use in English. Gothenburg Studies in English, vol. 2. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.Google Scholar
Evans, D. Simon, 1976. A Grammar of Middle Welsh. Dublin: Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies.Google Scholar
Filppula, Markku, 1997. Cross-dialectal parallels and language contacts: Evidence from Celtic Englishes. In Hickey, Raymond and Puppel, Stanisław (eds), Language History and Linguistic Modelling: A Festschrift for Jacek Fisiak on his 60th Birthday, pp. 943–957. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Filppula, Markku, 1999. The Grammar of Irish English: Language in Hibernian Style. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Filppula, Markku and Klemola, Juhani (eds), 2009. Re-evaluating the Celtic Hypothesis. Special issue of English Language and Linguistics 13 (2).Google Scholar
Filppula, Markku and Klemola, Juhani, 2012. Celtic and Celtic Englishes. In Bergs, Alexander and Brinton, Laurel (eds), English Historical Linguistics: An International Handbook, pp. 1687–1703. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Filppula, Markku, Klemola, Juhani and Paulasto, Heli, 2008. English and Celtic in Contact. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Foulkes, Paul and Docherty, Gerry (eds), 1999. Urban voices: Overview. In Foulkes, Paul and Docherty, Gerry (eds), Urban Voices, pp. 1–24. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Garrett, Andrew, 1998. On the origin of auxiliary do. English Language and Linguistics 2: 283–330.Google Scholar
Genee, Inge, 2005. Latin influence on Old Irish? Contact linguistics and the study of medieval language contact. Journal of Celtic Linguistics 9: 33–72.Google Scholar
Goose, Nigel et al. (eds), 2005. Immigrants in Tudor and Early Stuart England. Brighton: Sussex Academic Press.Google Scholar
Harris, John, 1984. English in the North of Ireland. In Trudgill, (ed.), pp. 115–134.Google Scholar
Harris, John, 1993. The grammar of Irish English. In Milroy, and Milroy, (eds), pp. 139–186.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin, 1999. External possession in a European areal perspective. In Wayne, Doris and Barshi, Immanuel (eds), External Possession, pp. 109–135. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hernández, Nuria, Kolbe, Daniela and Schulz, Monika Edith, 2011. A Comparative Grammar of British English Dialects, vol. 2: Modals, Pronouns and Complement Clauses. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond, 1984a. On the nature of labial velar shift. Journal of Phonetics 12: 345–354.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond, 1984b. Syllable onsets in Irish English. Word 35: 67–74.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond, 1995. Early contact and parallels between English and Celtic. Vienna English Working Papers 4 (2): 87–119.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond, 1997. Arguments for creolisation in Irish English. In Hickey, Raymond and Puppel, Stanisław (eds), Language History and Linguistic Modelling: A Festschrift for Jacek Fisiak on his 60th Birthday, pp. 969–1038. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond, 2003. Rectifying a standard deficiency: Pronominal distinctions in varieties of English. In Taavitsainen, Irma and Jucker, Andreas H. (eds), Diachronic Perspectives on Address Term Systems, pp. 345–374. Pragmatics and Beyond, New Series, vol. 107. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond, 2004. A Sound Atlas of Irish English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond, 2005. Dublin English: Evolution and Change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond, 2007. Irish English: History and Present-day Forms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond, 2008. Feature loss in 19th century Irish English. In Nevalainen, Terttu, Taavitsainen, Irma, Pahta, Päivi and Korhonen, Minna (eds), The Dynamics of Linguistic Variation: Corpus Evidence on English Past and Present, pp. 229–243. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond, 2009. Weak segments in Irish English. In Minkova, Donka (ed.), Phonological Weakness in English: From Old to Present-day English, pp. 116–129. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond, 2010. Attitudes and concerns in eighteenth-century English. In Hickey, Raymond (ed.), Eighteenth-century English: Ideology and Change, pp. 1–20. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond, 2011. The Dialects of Irish, Study of a Changing Landscape. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond, 2012a. English in Ireland. In Hickey, (ed.), Areal Features of the Anglophone World, pp. 79–107. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond, 2012b. Internally and externally motivated language change. In Hernández-Campoy, Juan Manuel and Conde-Silvestre, Juan Camilo (eds), The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics, pp. 401–421. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond, 2012c. Early English and the Celtic hypothesis. In Nevalainen, Terttu and Traugott, Elizabeth Closs (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, pp. 497–507. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond, 2012d. Assessing the role of contact in the history of English. In Nevalainen, Terttu and Traugott, Elizabeth Closs (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, pp. 485–496. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond (ed.), 2012e. Areal Features of the Anglophone World. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond (ed.), 2012f. Standards of English: Codified Varieties around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond, 2013a. Supraregionalisation and dissociation. In Chambers, J. K. and Schilling, Natalie (eds), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, second edition, pp. 537–554. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond, 2013b. English as a contact language in Ireland and Scotland. In Schreier, Daniel and Hundt, Marianne (eds), English as a Contact Language, pp. 88–105. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond, 2014. A Dictionary of Varieties of English. Malden, MA: Wiley- Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond, 2015. The North of England and Northern English. In Hickey, Raymond (ed.), Researching Northern English, pp. 1–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Holthausen, Friedrich, 1974. Altenglisches etymologisches Wörterbuch, second edition. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Honeybone, Patrick, 2007. New-dialect formation in nineteenth century Liverpool: A brief history of Scouse. In Grant, Anthony and Grey, Clive (eds), The Mersey Sound: Liverpool’s Language, People and Places, pp. 106–140. Liverpool: Open House Press.Google Scholar
Ihalainen, Ossi, 1994. The dialects of England since 1776. In Burchfield, (ed.), pp. 197–274.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto, 1940 [1909]. A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. 6 vols. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Jones, Mark J., 2002. The origin of Definite Article Reduction in northern English dialects: Evidence from dialect allomorphy. English Language and Linguistics 6: 325–345.Google Scholar
Jones, Morris and Thomas, Alan R., 1977. The Welsh Language: Studies in its Syntax and Semantics. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
Keller, Wolfgang, 1925. Keltisches im englischen Verbum. In Anglica: Untersuchungen zur englischen Philologie, vol. 1: Sprache und Kulturgeschichte. Leipzig: Mayer und Müller, pp. 55–66.Google Scholar
King, Gareth, 1993. Modern Welsh: A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Klemola, Juhani, 2000. The origins of the Northern Subject Rule: A case of early contact? In Tristram, Hildegard L. C. (ed.), The Celtic Englishes II, pp. 329–346. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Klemola, Juhani, 2002. Periphrastic DO: Dialectal distributions and origins. In Filppula, Markku, Klemola, Juhani and Pitkänen, Heli (eds), The Celtic Roots of English, pp. 199–210. Joensuu: University of Joensuu: Faculty of Humanities.Google Scholar
Klemola, Juhani, 2013. English as a contact language in the British Isles. In Schreier, Daniel and Hundt, Marianne (eds), English as a Contact Language, pp. 75–87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Klemola, Juhani and Filppula, Markku, 1992. Subordinating uses of ‘and’ in the history of English. In Rissaneni, Matti, Ihalainen, Ossi and Taavitsainen, Irma (eds), History of Englishes: New Methods and Interpretations in Historical Linguistics, pp. 310–318. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd and Lunkenheimer, Kerstin (eds), 2012. The Mouton Atlas of Variation in English. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd, Herrmann, Tanja, Pietsch, Lukas and Wagner, Susanne, 2005. A Comparative Grammar of British English Dialects, vol. 1: Agreement, Gender, Relative Clauses. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd and Upton, Clive (eds), 2008. Varieties of English, vol. 1: The British Isles. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lass, Roger, 1987. The Shape of English: Structure and History. London: Dent.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Hundt, Marianne, Mair, Christian and Smith, Nicholas, 2009. Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lutz, Angelika, 2009. Celtic influence on Old English and West Germanic. In Filppula, and Klemola, (eds), pp. 227–249.Google Scholar
Maguire, Warren, 2012. English and Scots in Scotland. In Hickey, (ed.), Areal Features of the Anglophone World, pp. 53–77.Google Scholar
Matasović, Ratko, 2007. Insular Celtic as a language area. In Tristram, Hildegard L. C. (ed.), The Celtic Languages in Contact, pp. 93–112. Potsdam: Potsdam University Press.Google Scholar
McClure, J. Derrick, 1994. English in Scotland. In Burchfield, (ed.), pp. 23–93.Google Scholar
McWhorter, John H., 2009. What else happened to English? A brief for the Celtic hypothesis. In Filppula, and Klemola, (eds), pp. 163–191.Google Scholar
Mesthrie, Rajend, 1992. English in Language Shift: The History, Structure and Sociolinguistics of South African Indian English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Milroy, James and Milroy, Lesley (eds), 1993. Real English: The Grammar of the English Dialects in the British Isles. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Bruce and Robinson, Fred, 2007. A Guide to Old English, seventh edition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mittendorf, Ingo and Poppe, Erich, 2000. Celtic contacts of the English progressive? In Tristram, Hildegard L. C. (ed.), The Celtic Englishes II, pp. 117–145. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Michael, 2001. British and Irish antecedents. In Algeo, John (ed.), English in North America, pp. 86–153. The Cambridge History of the English Language, vol. 6. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Michael and Gregg, Robert, 1997. The Scots language in Ulster. In Jones, Charles (ed.), The Edinburgh History of the Scots Language, pp. 569–622. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Mossé, Ferdinand, 1938. Histoire de la Forme Périphrastique Être + Participe Présent en Germanique, part 2: Moyen-Anglais et Anglais Moderne. Paris: Librairie C. Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Penhallurick, Robert, 2008a. Welsh English: Phonology. In Kortmann, and Upton, (eds), pp. 105–121.Google Scholar
Penhallurick, Robert, 2008b. Welsh English: Morphology and syntax. In Kortmann, and Upton, (eds), pp. 360–372.Google Scholar
Poplack, Shana and Tagliamonte, Sali, 2001. African American English in the Diaspora. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Poussa, Patricia, 1990. A contact-universals origin for periphrastic do, with special consideration of OE–Celtic contact. In Adamson, Sylvia, Law, Vivien, Vincent, Nigel and Wright, Susan (eds), Papers from the Fifth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics, pp. 407–434. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Preußler, Walter, 1938. Keltischer Einfluß im Englischen. Indogermanische Forschungen 56: 178–191.Google Scholar
Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena, 2005. The diffusion of subject YOU: A case study in historical sociolinguistics. Language Variation and Change 17: 55–73.Google Scholar
Rockel, Martin, 1989. Grundzüge einer Geschichte der irischen Sprache [Outline of a History of the Irish Language]. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Bernard et al. (eds), 2009. Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rupp, Laura and Page-Verhoeff, Hanne, 2005. Pragmatic and historical aspects of Definite Article Reduction in northern English dialects. English World-Wide 26 (3): 325–346.Google Scholar
Sabban, Annette, 1982. Gälisch–Englischer Sprachkontakt [Gaelic–English Language Contact]. Heidelberg: Groos.Google Scholar
Sabban, Annette, 1985. On the variability of Hebridean English syntax: The verbal group. In Görlach, Manfred (ed.), Focus on Scotland, pp. 125–144. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Schreier, Daniel, 2005. Consonant Change in English Worldwide: Synchrony Meets Diachrony. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Shuken, Cynthia, 1984. Highland and Island English. In Trudgill, (ed.), pp. 152–166.Google Scholar
Singler, John (ed.), 1990. Pidgin and Creole Tense-Mood-Aspect Systems. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt, 2012. Typological profile: L1 varieties. In Kortmann, and Lunkenheimer, (eds), pp. 827–842.Google Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt and Kortmann, Bernd, 2008. Vernacular universals and Angloversals in a typological perspective. In Filppula, Markku and Klemola, Juhani (eds), Vernacular Universals and Language Contacts, pp. 33–53. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thomas, Erik, 2008. Rural southern white accents. In Schneider, Edgar W. (eds), Varieties of English, vol. 2: The Americas and the Caribbean, pp. 87–114. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Tolkien, John R. R., 1963. English and Welsh. In Angles and Britons (The O’Donnell Lectures), pp. 1–41. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
Tristram, Hildegard L. C., 1997. Do-periphrasis in contact? In Ramisch, Heinrich and Wynne, Kenneth J. (eds), Language in Time and Space: Studies in Honour of Wolfgang Viereck on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday, pp. 401–417. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter (ed.), 1984. Language in the British Isles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter, 1998. Third-person singular zero: African American Vernacular English, East Anglian dialects and Spanish persecution in the Low Countries. Folia Linguistica Historica 18 (1/2): 139–148.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter, 2002. Sociolinguistic Variation and Change. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter, 2008. The dialect of East Anglia. In Kortmann, and Upton, (eds), pp. 178–193.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter, 2009. Sociolinguistic typology and complexification. In Sampson, Geoffrey, Gil, David and Trudgill, Peter (eds), Language Complexity as an Evolving Variable, pp. 98–109. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter, 2010. What really happened to Old English? In Trudgill, Peter, Investigations in Sociohistorical Linguistics: Stories of Colonisation and Contact, pp. 1–35. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Upton, Clive and Widdowson, John D. A., 2006. An Atlas of English Dialects, second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo, 2002. On the rise of ‘Celtic’ syntax in Middle English. In Lucas, Peter and Lucas, Angela (eds), From Tongue to Text: Papers from the Third International Conference on Middle English: University College Dublin, 1–4 July 1999, pp. 203–234. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Visser, Federicus T., 1963–1973. An Historical Syntax of the English Language, four volumes. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Wagner, Heinrich, 1959. Das Verbum in den Sprachen der britischen Inseln [The Verb in the Languages of the British Isles]. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Wagner, Susanne, 2008. English dialects in the South-West: Morphology and syntax. In Kortmann, and Upton, (eds), pp. 417–439.Google Scholar
Wagner, Susanne, 2012. Pronominal systems. In Hickey, (ed.), Areal Features of the Anglophone World, pp. 379–408.Google Scholar
Wakelin, Martyn, 1984. Rural dialects in England. In Trudgill, (ed.), pp. 70–93.Google Scholar
Wakelin, Martyn, 1986. The Southwest of England. Varieties of English Around the World, Text Series, vol. 5. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Wakelin, Martyn, 1988. The phonology of South-Western English 1500–1700. In Fisiak, Jacek (ed.), Historical Dialectology: Regional and Social, pp. 609–644. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Watson, Kevin and Clark, Lynn, 2016. The origins of Liverpool English. In Hickey, Raymond (ed.), Listening to the Past: Audio Records of Accents of English, pp. 113–141. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Stephen, 1980. A Welsh Grammar. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
Winford, Donald, 2005. Contact-induced changes: Classification and processes. Diachronica 22 (2): 373–427.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×