Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-dc8c957cd-jg5zz Total loading time: 2.971 Render date: 2022-01-28T09:49:17.228Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Part V - Language and communication development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2017

Brian Hopkins
Lancaster University
Elena Geangu
Lancaster University
Sally Linkenauger
Lancaster University
Get access


Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Ambridge, B., & Lieven, E.V. (2011). Child language acquisition: Contrasting theoretical approaches. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guasti, M.T. (2004). Language acquisition: The growth of grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lust, B.C. (2006). Child language: Acquisition and growth. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pine, J.M., Freudenthal, D., Krajewski, G., & Gobet, F. (2013). Do young children have adult-like syntactic categories? Zipf’s law and the case of the determiner. Cognition, 127, 345360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aguado-Orea, J., & Pine, J.M. (2015). Comparing different models of the development of verb inflection in early child Spanish. PloS ONE, 10, e0119613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambridge, B., & Lieven, E.V.M. (2015). A constructivist account. In MacWhinney, B. & O’Grady, W. (Eds.), Handbook of language emergence (pp. 478510). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ambridge, B., & Rowland, C.F. (2009). Predicting children’s errors with negative questions: Testing a schema-combination account. Cognitive Linguistics, 20, 225266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambridge, B., Kidd, E., Rowland, C.F., & Theakston, A.L. (2015). The ubiquity of frequency effects in first language acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 42, 239273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968). The sound patterns of English. New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Christophe, A., Millotte, S., Bernal, S., & Lidz, J. (2008). Bootstrapping lexical and syntactic acquisition. Language and Speech, 51, 6175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freudenthal, D., Pine, J.M., & Gobet, F. (2005). On the resolution of ambiguities in the extraction of syntactic categories through chunking. Cognitive Systems Research, 6, 1725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freudenthal, D., Pine, J.M., & Gobet, F. (2010). Explaining quantitative variation in the rate of Optional Infinitive errors across languages: A comparison of MOSAIC and the Variational Learning Model. Journal of Child Language, 37, 643669.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gambell, T., & Yang, C.D. (2003). Scope and limits of statistical learning in word segmentation. Proceedings of the 34th Northeastern Linguistic Society Meeting (NELS), Stony Brook University, New York, pp. 2930.Google Scholar
Hayiou-Thomas, M.E., Bishop, D.V. M., & Plunkett, K. (2004). Simulating SLI: General cognitive processing stressors can produce a specific linguistic profile. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 47, 13471362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hollich, G.J., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R.M., Brand, R.J., Brown, E., Chung, H.L., … & Bloom, L. (2000). Breaking the language barrier: An emergentist coalition model for the origins of word learning. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, i135.Google ScholarPubMed
Jusczyk, P.W. (1999). How infants begin to extract words from speech. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 323328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinker, S. (1987). The bootstrapping problem in language acquisition. In MacWhinney, B. (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 339441). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rice, M.L., Warren, S.F., & Betz, S.K. (2005). Language symptoms of developmental language disorders: An overview of autism, Down syndrome, fragile X, specific language impairment, and Williams syndrome. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakas, W.G., & Fodor, J.D. (2001). The structural triggers learner. In Bertolo, S. (Ed.), Language acquisition and learnability (pp. 228300). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Santelmann, L., Berk, S., Austin, J., Somashekar, S., & Lust, B. (2002). Continuity and development in the acquisition of inversion in yes/no questions: Dissociating movement and inflection. Journal of Child Language, 29, 813842.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Van der Lely, H.K.J. (1997). Language and cognitive development in a grammatical SLI boy: Modularity and innateness. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 10, 75107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vihman, M.M., & Croft, W. (2007). Phonological development: Toward a “radical” templatic phonology. Linguistics, 45, 683725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wexler, K. (1998). Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint: A new explanation of the optional infinitive stage. Lingua, 106, 2379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E. (2001). Bilingualism in development: Language, literacy, and cognition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosjean, F. (2010). Bilingual: Life and reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werker, J.F., Byers-Heinlein, K., & Fennell, C.T. (2009). Bilingual beginnings to learning words. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364, 36493663.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bialystok, E., Luk, G., Peets, K.F., & Yang, S. (2010). Receptive vocabulary differences in monolingual and bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13, 525531.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bosch, L., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2003). Simultaneous bilingualism and the perception of a language-specific vowel contrast in the first year of life. Language and Speech, 46, 217243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Byers-Heinlein, K., Burns, T.C., & Werker, J.F. (2010). The roots of bilingualism in newborns. Psychological Science, 21, 343348.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Core, C., Hoff, E., Rumiche, R., & Señor, M. (2013). Total and conceptual vocabulary in Spanish–English bilinguals from 22 to 30 months: Implications for assessment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56, 16371649.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Houwer, A. (1990). The acquisition of two languages from birth: A case study. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, Supplementary volume. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Commission ( 2012). Europeans and their languages. Retrieved from:
Fennell, C.T., Byers-Heinlein, K., & Werker, J.F. (2007). Using speech sounds to guide word learning: The case of bilingual infants. Child Development, 78, 15101525.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fenson, L., Dale, P.S., Reznick, J.S., Bates, E., Thal, D.J., & Pethick, S.J. (1994). Variability in early communicative development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59, 1173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
García, O., & Kleifgen, J. (2010). Educating emergent bilinguals: Policies, programs and practices for English language learners. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Green, D.W. (1998). Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 6781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroll, J.F., & Stewart, E. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 149174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhl, P.K., Stevens, E., Hayashi, A., Deguchi, T., Kiritani, S., & Iverson, P. (2006). Infants show a facilitation effect for native language phonetic perception between 6 and 12 months. Developmental Science, 9, F13F21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morales, J., Calvo, A., & Bialystok, E. (2013). Working memory development in monolingual and bilingual children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 114, 187202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oller, D.K., Pearson, B.Z., & Cobo-Lewis, A.B. (2007). Profile effects in early bilingual language and literacy. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 191230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peal, E., & Lambert, W.E. (1962). The relation of bilingualism to intelligence. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 76, 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, C. (2013). Language use in the United States: 2011. American Community Survey Reports. U.S. Census Bureau. Retrieved from:
Saer, D.J. (1923). The effect of bilingualism on intelligence. British Journal of Psychology, 14, 2538.Google Scholar
Smith, M.E. (1931). A study of five bilingual children from the same family. Child Development, 2, 184187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smithson, L., Paradis, J., & Nicoladis, E. (2014). Bilingualism and receptive vocabulary achievement: Could sociocultural context make a difference? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17, 810821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statistics Canada ( 2012). Linguistic characteristics of Canadians. Language, 2011 Census of Population. Retrieved from:
Werker, J.F., Fennell, C.T., Corcoran, K.M., & Stager, C.L. (2002). Infants’ ability to learn phonetically similar words: Effects of age and vocabulary size. Infancy, 3, 130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werker, J.F., Gilber, J.H.V., Humphrey, K., & Tees, R.C. (1981). Developmental aspects of cross-language speech perception. Child Development, 52, 349355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werker, J.F., Yeung, H.H., & Yoshida, K. (2012). How do infants become native speech perception experts? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 221226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, V., & Ryan, D. (2016). The Routledge handbook of the English writing system. Abingdon: UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Melby-Lervåg, M., Lyster, S., & Hulme, C. (2012). Phonological skills and their role in learning to read: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 322352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nunes, T., & Bryant, P. (2009). Children’s reading and spelling: Beyond the first steps. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Treiman, R., & Kessler, B. (2014). How children learn to write words. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berninger, V.W., Garcia, N.P., & Abbott, R.D. (2009). Multiple processes that matter in writing instruction and assessment. In Troia, G.A. (Ed.), Instruction and assessment for struggling writers: Evidence-based practices (pp. 1550). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Bradley, L., & Bryant, P.E. (1983). Categorising sounds and learning to read: A causal connection. Nature, 301, 419421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullinaria, J.A. (1997). Modeling reading, spelling, and past tense learning with artificial neural networks. Brain and Language, 59, 236266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carlisle, J.F. (1988). Knowledge of derivational morphology and spelling ability in fourth, sixth and eighth graders. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 247266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ehri, L. (2000). Learning to read and learning to spell: Two sides of a coin. Topics in Language Disorders, 20, 1936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frith, U. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In Patterson, K., Marshall, J., & Coltheart, M. (Eds.), Surface dyslexia: Neuropsychological and cognitive studies of phonological reading (pp. 301330). London, UK: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gough, P.B., & Tunmer, W.E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatcher, P.J., Hulme, C., & Snowling, M.J. (2004). Explicit phoneme training combined with phonic reading instruction helps young children at risk of reading failure. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 338358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayes, H., Treiman, R., & Kessler, B. (2006). Children use vowels to help them spell consonants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 94, 2742.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. (2013). Learning to read: What we know and what we need to understand better. Child Development Perspectives, 7, 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, N., & Bryant, P. (2003). Do beez buzz? Rule-based and frequency-based knowledge in learning to spell plural -s. Child Development, 74, 6374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, I., & Ehri, L.C. (2009). Young children’s ability to read and spell their own and classmates’ names: The role of letter knowledge. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13, 249273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunes, T., Bryant, P.E., & Bindman, M. (1997). Learning to spell regular and irregular verbs. Reading and Writing, 9, 427449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakhill, J., & Garnham, A. (1988). Becoming a skilled reader. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Oakhill, J., Cain, K., & Yuill, N. (1998). Individual differences in children’s comprehension skill: Toward an integrated model. In Hulme, C. & Joshi, R.M. (Eds.), Reading and spelling: Development and disorders (pp. 344367). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rayner, K., Ardoin, S.P., & Binder, K.S. (2013). Children’s eye movements in reading: A commentary. School Psychology Review, 42, 223233.Google Scholar
Share, D.L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Treiman, R., & Yin, L. (2011). Early differentiation between drawing and writing in Chinese children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108, 786801.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Treiman, R., Cassar, M., & Zukowski, A. (1994). What types of linguistic information do children use in spelling? The case of flaps. Child Development, 65, 13181337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Treiman, R., Cohen, J., Mulqueeny, K., Kessler, B., & Schechtman, S. (2007). Young children’s knowledge about printed names. Child Development, 78, 14581471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, C., Kemp, N., & Plester, B. (2014). Text messaging and literacy: The evidence. Oxford, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Aske, D., Connolly, L., & Corman, R. (2013). Accessibility or accountability? The rhetoric of No Child Left Behind. Journal of Economics and Economic Education Research, 14, 107118.Google Scholar
Ferguson, M. (2014). 3 hurdles for Common Core adoption. Phi Delta Kappan, 95, 6869.Google Scholar
Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L.S. (2006). Introduction to Response to Intervention: What, why, and how valid is it? Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 9399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, P.J., (2010). Repeating views on grade retention. Childhood Education, 87, 90–93.CrossRef
Taylor, B.M., Raphael, T.E., & Au, K.H. (2011). Reading and school reform. In Kamil, M., Pearson, P.D., Moje, E.B., & Afflerbach, P.P. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. IV, pp. 594628). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bloome, D., Averill, J., Hill, H., & Ryu, S. (2014). Ideologies and their consequences in defining literacies: An essay. In Dunston, P.J., Fullerton, S.K., Cole, M.W., Herro, D., Malloy, J.A., Wilder, P.M., & Headley, K.N. (Eds.), 63rd yearbook of the Literacy Research Association (pp. 6177). Altamonte Springs, FL: Literacy Research Association.Google Scholar
Goodlad, J. (1954). Some effects of promotion and non-promotion upon the social and personal adjustment of children. Journal of Experimental Education, 22, 301328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haberman, M. (2007). Who benefits from failing urban schools? An essay. Theory Into Practice, 46, 179186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, S.B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jimerson, S.R., & Ferguson, P. (2007). A longitudinal study of grade retention: Academic and behavioral outcomes of retained students through adolescence. School Psychology Quarterly, 22, 314339.CrossRef
Johnston, P.H. (2010). An instructional frame for RTI. The Reading Teacher, 63, 602604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, P.H., & Allington, R. (1991). Remediation. In Barr, R., Kamil, M., Mosenthal, P.B., & Pearson, P.D. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. II, pp. 9841012). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Klene, V., & Branson, E. (1929). Trial promotion versus failure. Educational Research Bulletin, 8, 6–1.Google Scholar
Leu, D.J., Kinzer, C.K., Coiro, J., Castek, J., & Henry, L.A. (2011). New literacies: A dual-level theory of the changing nature of literacy, instruction, and assessment. In Alvermann, D.E., Unrau, N.J., & Ruddell, R.B. (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (6th ed., pp. 11501181). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
Moje, E.B., Stockdill, D., Kim, K., & Kim, H. (2011). The role of text in disciplinary learning. In Kamil, M., Pearson, P.D., Moje, E.B., & Afflerbach, P.P. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. IV, pp. 453486). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ogbu, J.U. (1988). Literacy and schooling in subordinate cultures: The case of Black America. In Kintgen, E.R., Kroll, B.M., & Rose, M. (Eds.), Perspectives on literacy (pp. 227242). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Reardon, S., & Owens, A. (2014). 60 years after Brown: Trends and consequences of school segregation. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 199218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rueda, R. (2011). 21st-century skills: Cultural, linguistic, and motivational perspectives. In Alvermann, D.E., Unrau, N.J., & Ruddell, R.B. (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (6th ed., pp. 12411267). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
Villegas, A.M. (1983). School failure and cultural mismatch: Another view. Urban Review, 20, 253265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wixson, K.K., Lipson, M.Y., & Johnston, P.H. (2010). Making the most of RTI. In Lipson, M.Y & Wixson, K.K. (Eds.), Successful approaches to RTI: Collaborative practices for improving K-12 Literacy (pp. 1–19). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
Davis, B.L., & Bedore, L.M. (2013). An emergence approach to speech acquisition: Doing and knowing. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Kuhl, P.K., & Damasio, A. (2012). Language. In Kandel, E.R., Schwartz, J.H., Jessell, T.M., Siegelbaum, S., & Hudspeth, J. (Eds.), Principles of neural science (5th ed., pp. 13531372). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J. (2012). The dynamic lexicon. In Cohn, A., Huffman, M., & Fougeron, C. (Eds), Handbook of laboratory phonology (pp. 173–83). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vihman, M.M. (2014). Phonological development: The first two years (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dick, F., Krishnan, S., Leech, R., & Curtin, S. (2016). Language development. In Hickok, G. & Small, S.L. (Eds.), Neurobiology of language (pp. 373388). New York, NY: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eimas, P.D., Siquel, and E.R., Jusczyk, P., & Vigorito, J. (1971). Speech perception in infants. Science, 171, 303306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giulivi, S., Whalen, D.H., Goldstein, L.M., Nam, H., & Levitt, A.G. (2011). An articulatory phonology account of preferred consonant–vowel combinations. Language Learning & Development, 7, 202225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guenther, F.H., Ghosh, S.S., & Tourville, J.A. (2006). Neural modeling and imaging of the cortical interactions underlying syllable production. Brain & Language, 96, 280301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kent, R.K. (2005). Speech development. In Hopkins, B. (Ed.), The Cambridge encyclopedia of child development (pp. 249257). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kern, S., Davis, B.L. & Zink, I. (2010). From babbling to first words in four languages: Common trends, cross language and individual differences. In Hombert, J.-M. & d’Errico, F. (Eds.), Becoming eloquent (pp. 205232). Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kröger, B.J., Kannampuzha, J., & Kaufmann, E. (2014). Associative learning and self-organization as basic principles for simulating speech acquisition, speech production, and speech perception. Nonlinear Biomedical Physics, 2, 128.Google Scholar
Kuhl, P.K., & Meltzoff, A.N. (1982). The bimodal perception of speech in infancy. Science, 218, 11381141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacNeilage, P.F., & Davis, B.L. (1990). Acquisition of speech production: Frames, then content. In Jeannerod, M. (Ed.), Attention and performance XIII: Motor representation and control (pp. 453475). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Mattock, K., Molnar, M., Polka, L., & Burnham, D. (2008). The developmental course of lexical tone perception in the first year of life. Cognition, 106, 13671381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Νicolaidis, K. (2006). Speech development. In Brown, K. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language & linguistics (pp. 722736). New York, NY: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nittrouer, S., Studdert-Kennedy, M., & McGowan, R.S. (1989). The emergence of phonetic segments: Evidence from the spectral structure of fricative–vowel sequences spoken by children and adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 32, 120132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, M.L., & Werker, J.F. (2003). Two-month-olds match vowel information in the face & voice. Developmental Science, 6, 191196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petitto, L.A., Berens, M.S., Kovelman, I., Dubins, M.H., Jasinska, K., & Shalinsky, M. (2012). The “Perceptual Wedge” hypothesis as the basis for bilingual babies’ phonetic processing advantage: New insights from fNIRS brain imaging. Brain and Language, 121, 130143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Polka, L., & Werker, J.F. (1994). Developmental changes in perception of non-native vowel contrasts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 421435.Google Scholar
Prince, A., & Smolensky, P. (2004). Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saffran, J., Werker, J.F., & Werner, L. (2006). The infants’ auditory world: Hearing, speech, and the beginnings of language. In Kuhn, D. & Siegler, M. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 2: Cognition, perception, and language (pp. 58108), Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Vihman, M.M., & Croft, W. (2007). Phonological development: Toward a ‘radical’ templatic phonology. Linguistics, 45, 683725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vorperian, H.K., Wang, S., Chung, M.K., Schimek, E.M., Durtschi, R.B., Kent, R.D., Ziegert, A.J., & Gentry, L.R. (2009). Anatomic development of the oral & pharyngeal portions of the vocal tract: An imaging study. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125, 16661678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werker, J.F., & Tees, R.C. (1984). Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development, 7, 4963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats