Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-544b6db54f-2p87r Total loading time: 0.394 Render date: 2021-10-20T02:01:49.056Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

A

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Ian A. McFarland
Affiliation:
Emory University's Candler School of Theology
David A. S. Fergusson
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Karen Kilby
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
Iain R. Torrance
Affiliation:
University of Aberdeen
Ian A. McFarland
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta
David A. S. Fergusson
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Karen Kilby
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
Iain R. Torrance
Affiliation:
Princeton Theological Seminary
Get access

Summary

Abba The biblical record indicates that abba, the Aramaic word for ‘father’, was the form of address used by Jesus for God (see, e.g., Matt. 11:25–6; 26:39, 42; Luke 23:34, 46; John 11:41; 12:27–8; 17:5, 11, 21, 24–5). This usage appears to have been regarded as significant enough that it is one of the few pieces of Aramaic that is preserved untranslated in the Gospels (Mark 14:36). Jesus commended the same form of address to his disciples (Matt. 6:9; Luke 11:2; cf. John 20:17), and, again, its significance was such that it appears to have been preserved even among Greek-speaking communities in its Aramaic form (Rom. 8:15; Gal. 4:6).

While scholars disagree over whether or not Jews customarily addressed God as ‘Father’ before Jesus' time (cf. Isa. 63:16; Jer. 3:19), there seems little question that Jesus' use of the term was regarded by his followers as distinctive. The canonical evangelists understand Jesus' use of ‘Father’ as correlative of his own status as ‘Son’ (Matt. 11:27; John 17:1; cf. Matt. 3:17; 17:5 and pars.). From this perspective, later developed explicitly in the doctrine of the Trinity, God's identity as ‘Father’ does not refer to a generic relationship between Creator and creature, but rather to a unique relationship with God's own co-eternal Word (John 1:1; see Logos), who, as ‘Son’, enjoys an intimacy with God that has no creaturely parallel (John 1:18).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baird, R. M. and Rosenbaum, S. E., eds., The Ethics of Abortion: Pro-Life Vs. Pro-Choice (Prometheus, 2001).Google Scholar
Johnston, G. F., Abortion from the Religious and Moral Perspective: An Annotated Bibliography (Praeger, 2003).Google Scholar
Knight, G. R., Reading Ellen White (Review and Herald, 1997).Google Scholar
Vyhmeister, N. J., ‘Who Are Seventh-Day Adventists?’ in Handbook of Seventh-Day Adventist Theology, ed. R. Dederen Commentary Reference Series 12 (Review and Herald, 2000), 1–21.Google Scholar
Hart, D. B., The Beauty of the Infinite: The Aesthetics of Christian Truth (Eerdmans, 2003).Google Scholar
Nichols, A., Redeeming Beauty: Soundings in Sacral Aesthetics (Ashgate, 2007).Google Scholar
Sherry, P., Spirit and Beauty: An Introduction to Theological Aesthetics (Clarendon Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Williams, R., Grace and Necessity: Reflections on Art and Love (Continuum, 2006).Google Scholar
Bediako, K., Christianity in Africa: The Renewal of a Non-Western Religion (Orbis, 1995).Google Scholar
Conradie, E. M., ed., African Christian Theologies in Transformation (EFSA, 2004).Google Scholar
Hansen, L., ed., Christian in Public: Aims, Methodologies and Issues in Public Theology (SUN Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Knighton, B., ‘Issues of African Theology at the Turn of the Millennium’, Transformation 21:3 (July 2004), 147–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Motlhabi, M. G., ‘Black or African Theology? Toward an Integral African Theology’, Journal of Black Theology in South Africa 8:2 (1994), 113–41.Google Scholar
Oduyoye, M. A., Introducing African Women's Theology (Sheffield Academic Press, 2001).Google Scholar
White, S. R., A Space for Unknowing: The Place of Agnosis in Faith (Columba Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Wiles, M., ‘Belief, Openness and Religious Commitment’, Theology 101:801 (May/June 1995), 163–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Keefe, J. and Reno, R., Sanctified Vision: An Introduction to Early Christian Interpretation of the Bible (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Anderson, G., The Genesis of Perfection: Adam and Eve in Jewish and Christian Imagination (John Knox Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Burrell, D., , C. S. C., Aquinas: God and Action (University of Notre Dame Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Clarke, W. N., , S. J., Explorations in Metaphysics: Being – God – Person (University of Notre Dame Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Jüngel, E., God As the Mystery of the World: On the Foundation of the Theology of the Crucified One in the Dispute between Theism and Atheism (T&T Clark, 1999 [1977]).Google Scholar
Jüngel, E., Natural Theology: Comprising ‘Nature and Grace’ by Professor Dr. Emil Brunner and the Reply ‘No!’ by Dr. Karl Barth (Wipf and Stock, 2002).Google Scholar
Rolnick, P. A., Analogical Possibilities: How Words Refer to God (Oxford University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Morse, C., Not Every Spirit: A Dogmatics of Christian Disbelief (Trinity Press International, 1994).Google Scholar
Georgianna, L., The Solitary Self: Individuality in the Ancrene Wisse (Harvard University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Daniélou, J., The Angels and Their Mission (Christian Classics Inc., 1982 [1957]).Google Scholar
Keck, D., Angels and Angelology in the Middle Ages (Oxford University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Peterson, E., The Angels and the Liturgy, 2nd edn(Herder and Herder, 1964).Google Scholar
Chapman, M. D., Anglicanism: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaye, B., An Introduction to World Anglicanism (Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Sykes, S., The Integrity of Anglicanism (Mowbray, 1978).Google Scholar
Ward, K., A History of Global Anglicanism (Cambridge University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, R., Anglican Identities (Darton, Longman and Todd, 2004).Google Scholar
Wingate, A., Ward, K., Pemberton, C., and Sitshebo, W., Anglicanism: A Global Communion (Mowbray, 1998).Google Scholar
Linzey, A., Animal Gospel (John Knox Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Webb, S. H., On God and Dogs: A Christian Theology of Compassion for Animals (Oxford University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Fudge, E., The Fire That Consumes: A Biblical and Historical Study of Final Punishment (Verdict, 1982).Google Scholar
Haffner, P., The Sacramental Mystery (Gracewing, 1999).Google Scholar
Macquarrie, J., A Guide to the Sacraments (SCM, 1997).Google Scholar
Stuart, E., ‘The Sacrament of Unction’ in The Wounds that Heal: Theology, Imagination and Health, ed. Baxter, J. (SPCK, 2007), 197–214.Google Scholar
Davies, B. and Leftow, B., eds., The Cambridge Companion to Anselm (Cambridge University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, J., A Companion to the Study of St. Anselm (University of Minnesota Press, 1972).Google Scholar
Huyssteen, W., Alone in the World? Human Uniqueness in Science and Theology (Eerdmans, 2006).Google Scholar
Santmire, P., The Travail of Nature: The Ambiguous Ecological Promise of Christianity (Fortress, 1985).Google Scholar
Bozeman, T. D., The Precisianist Strain: Disciplinary Religion and Antinomian Backlash in Puritanism to 1638 (University of North Carolina Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Como, D. R., Blown by the Spirit: Puritanism and the Emergence of an Antinomian Underground in Pre-Civil-War England (Stanford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Collins, J. J., McGinn, B., and Stein, S., The Encyclopedia of Apocalypticism, 3 vols. (Continuum, 2000).Google Scholar
Rowland, C., The Open Heaven: A Study of Apocalyptic in Judaism and Early Christianity (SPCK, 1982).Google Scholar
Lossky, V., The Mystical Theology of the Eastern Church (St Vladimir's Seminary Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Papanikolaou, A., Being with God: Trinity, Apophaticism, and Divine–Human Communion (University of Notre Dame Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Turner, D., The Darkness of God: Negativity in Christian Mysticism (Cambridge University Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, R., ‘Lossky, the Via negativa and the Foundations of Theology’, in Wrestling with Angels: Conversations in Modern Theology, ed. Higton, M. (Eerdmans, 2007), 1–24.Google Scholar
Johnson, L. T., The Creed: What Christians Believe and Why It Matters (Image, 2004).Google Scholar
Gres-Gayer, J. M., ‘The Unigenitus of Clement XI: A Fresh Look at the Issues’, Theological Studies 49 (1988), 259–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radner, E., Spirit and Nature: The Saint-Médard Miracles in 18th-Century Jansenism (Crossroad, 2002).Google Scholar
Burrell, D., Aquinas: God and Action (University of Notre Dame Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Emery, G., , O. P., The Trinitarian Theology of Thomas Aquinas (Oxford University Press, 2007 [2004]).Google Scholar
Healy, N. M., Thomas Aquinas: Theologian of the Christian Life (Ashgate, 2003).Google Scholar
Preller, V., Divine Science and the Science of God: A Reformulation of Thomas Aquinas (Princeton University Press, 1967).Google Scholar
Ayres, L., Nicaea and Its Legacy: An Approach to Fourth Century Trinitarian Theology (Oxford University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, R. P. C., The Search for the Christian Doctrine of God (T&T Clark, 1988).Google Scholar
Williams, R., Arius: Heresy and Tradition (Darton, Longman and Todd, 1988).Google Scholar
Bowlin, J., ‘Psychology and Theodicy in Aquinas’, Medieval Philosophy and Theology 7 (1998), 129–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, M., The Alleged Aristotelianism of Thomas Aquinas (Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 1992).Google Scholar
Kent, B., Virtues of the Will (Catholic University of America Press, 1995).Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A., After Virtue (University of Notre Dame Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Aramian, M., ‘Yovhannēs Sarkawag's “Concerning the Symbol of Faith of the Three Hundred and Eighteen at the Council of Nicaea”’, St. Nersess Theological Review 4 (1999), 1–32.Google Scholar
Garsoïan, N. G., L'eglise arménienne et le grand schisme d'Orient (Peeters, 1999).Google Scholar
Bangs, C., Arminius: A Study in the Dutch Reformation (Abingdon Press, 1971).Google Scholar
Olson, R. E., Arminian Theology: Myths and Realities (InterVarsity Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Davies, J. G., He Ascended into Heaven: A Study in the History of Doctrine (Lutterworth Press, 1958).Google Scholar
Farrow, D., Ascension and Ecclesia (T&T Clark, 1999).Google Scholar
Farrow, D., Ascension Theology (T&T Clark, 2011).
Guéranger, P., The Liturgical Year: Pascal Time, vol. III (French edn, 1871; St Austin Press, 2000), 167–265.Google Scholar
Freiberger, O., ed., Asceticism and Its Critics: Historical Accounts and Comparative Perspectives (AAR, 2006).Google Scholar
Goehring, J. E., Ascetics, Society, and the Desert (Trinity Press International, 2002).Google Scholar
Harpham, G. G., The Ascetic Imperative in Culture and Criticism (University of Chicago Press, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valantasis, R. and Wimbush, V. L., eds., Asceticism (Oxford University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Lee, S. H., The Liminal Christian: An Asian American Theology (Augsburg Fortress, 2010).Google Scholar
Matsuoka, F., Out of Silence: Emerging Themes in Asian American Churches (United Church, 1995).Google Scholar
Shoemaker, S., Ancient Traditions of the Virgin Mary's Dormition and Assumption (Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Beeke, J. R., Assurance of Faith: Calvin, English Puritanism, and the Dutch Second Reformation (Peter Lang, 1991).Google Scholar
Zachman, R. C., The Assurance of Faith: Conscience in the Theology of Martin Luther and John Calvin (John Knox Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Kelly, J. N. D., The Athanasian Creed (Harper & Row, 1964).Google Scholar
Anatolios, K., Athanasius: The Coherence of His Thought (Routledge, 1998).Google Scholar
Haught, J., God and the New Atheism: A Critical Response to Dawkins, Harris, and Hitchens (John Knox Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Westphal, M., Suspicion and Faith: The Religious Uses of Modern Atheism (Fordham University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Sherrard, P., Athos: The Mountain of Silence (Oxford University Press, 1960).Google Scholar
Sophrony, Archimandrite, St. Silouan the Athonite (St Vladimir's Seminary Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Aulén, G., Christus Victor: A Historical Study of the Three Main Types of the Idea of the Atonement (Collier/Macmillan, 1969).Google Scholar
Baillie, D. M., God Was In Christ: An Essay on Incarnation and Atonement (Scribners, 1948).Google Scholar
Barth, K., Church Dogmatics (T&T Clark, 1956), IV/1, 157–357.Google Scholar
McIntyre, J., The Shape of Soteriology: Studies in the Doctrine of the Death of Christ (T&T Clark, 1992).Google Scholar
Torrance, T. F., The Trinitarian Faith (T&T Clark, 1995).Google Scholar
Barth, K., Church Dogmatics (T&T Clark, 1957), II/1.Google Scholar
Farley, E., Divine Empathy: A Theology of God (Fortress, 1996).Google Scholar
Gunton, C., Act and Being: Towards a Theology of the Divine Attributes (SCM, 2002).Google Scholar
Hoffman, J. and Rosenkrantz, G. S., The Divine Attributes (Blackwell, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pannenberg, W., Systematic Theology, vol. I (T&T Clark, 1991).Google Scholar
Schwöbel, C., ‘Exploring the Logic of Divine Perfection: Divine Attributes and Divine Agency’ in God: Action and Revelation (Kok Pharos, 1992), 46–62.Google Scholar
Ayres, L., Augustine and the Trinity (Cambridge University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, P., Augustine: A Biography (University of California Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Dodaro, R., ed., Augustine and his Critics (Routledge, 2000).Google Scholar
Harrison, C., Augustine: Christian Truth and Fractured Humanity (Oxford University Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lancel, S., St. Augustine (SCM, 2002).Google Scholar

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×