Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-7ccbd9845f-9nx8b Total loading time: 1.299 Render date: 2023-02-01T14:59:19.077Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2021

Don Garrett
Affiliation:
New York University
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

1663. Renati Des Cartes Principiorum Philosophiae Pars I, et II, more geometrico demonstratae per Benedictum de Spinoza Amstelodamensem. Accesserunt ejusdem Cogitata Metaphysica. Amsterdam: Jan Rieuwertsz.Google Scholar
1664. Renatus Des Cartes Beginzelen der Wysbegeerte, I en II Deel, Na de Meetkonstige wijze door Benedictus de Spinoza Amsterdammer. Mitsgaders des zelfs overnatuurkundige Gedachten. Alies uit ‘t Latijn vertaalt door P. B. Amsterdam: Jan Rieuwertsz.Google Scholar
1677a. B.d.S. Opera posthuma, quorum series post praefationem exhibetur. Amsterdam: Jan Rieuwertsz.Google Scholar
1677b. De nagelate schriften van B.d.S. [Amsterdam: Jan Rieuwertsz].Google Scholar
1802–3. Benedicti de Spinoza opera quae supersunt omnia, 2 vols., ed. Paulus, H. E. G.. Jena: In Bibliofolio Academico Spinoza.Google Scholar
1882–83. Benedicti de Spinoza Opera quotquot reperta sunt, 2 vols., ed. van Vloten, J. and Land, J. P. N.. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
1883. Ethic Demonstrated in Geometrical Order and Divided into Five Parts, trans. White, W. H.. London: Trübner and Co.Google Scholar
1883–84. The Chief Works of Benedict Spinoza, trans. Elwes, R. H. M.. London: G. Bell and Sons.Google Scholar
1907. Éthique, trans. de Boulainvilliers, H., ed. d’Istria, F. Colonna. Paris: A. Colin.Google Scholar
1925. Spinoza Opera, 4 vols., ed. Gebhardt, Carl. Heidelberg: Winter (reprinted 1972) [cited as G].Google Scholar
1954. Oeuvres Complètes, ed. and trans. Caillois, Roland, Francès, Madeleine, and Misrahi, Robert. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
1958. Political Works, ed. Wernham, A. G.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
1928. The Correspondence of Spinoza, ed. and trans. Wolf, A.. London: Allen & Unwin (reprinted 1966, London: Frank Cass).Google Scholar
1974. The Principles of Descartes’ Philosophy [with Cogitata Metaphysica], second ed., ed. and trans. Britan, Halbert Hains. La Salle: Open Court (first ed. 1905).Google Scholar
1977. Briefwisseling, ed. and trans. Akkerman, F., Hubbeling, H. G., and Westerbrink, A. G.. Amsterdam: Wereldbibliotheek.Google Scholar
1985. The Collected Works of Spinoza, Volume I, ed. and trans. Curley, Edwin M.. Princeton: Princeton University Press [cited as CW I].Google Scholar
1985 [attributed]. Spinoza’s Algebraic Calculation of the Rainbow; and, Calculation of Chances, ed. Petry, M. J.. The Hague: M. Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1986. Korte Verhandeling, van God, de Mensch, en deszelvs Welstand. Breve Trattato su Dio, l’Uomo, et il suo Bene, ed. and trans. Mignini, F.. L’Aquila: L. U. Japadre editore.Google Scholar
1987. Spinoza Opera, vol. 5: Supplementa, ed. Gebhardt, Carl. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
1992. Traité de la réforme de l’entendement, ed. and trans. Rousset, Bernard. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
1994. A Spinoza Reader, ed. and trans. Curley, Edwin M.. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
1995. Spinoza: The Letters, ed. and trans. Shirley, Samuel. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
2009. Œuvres, vol. 1: Premiers écrits, ed. and trans. Miginini, Filippo, Beyssade, Michelle, and Ganault, Joël. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
2011. The Vatican Manuscript of Spinoza’s Ethica, ed. Spruit, L. and Totaro, P.. Brill: Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2015. Obras completas y biografías, ed. and trans. Domínguez, Atilano. Madrid: ViveLibroGoogle Scholar
2016. The Collected Works of Spinoza, Volume II, ed. and trans. Curley, Edwin M.. Princeton: Princeton University Press [cited as CW II].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2020a. Spinoza’s Ethics, trans. Eliot, George, ed. Carlisle, C.. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
2020b. Œuvres, vol. 4: Ethica/Éthique, eds. Akkerman, Latin text Fokke and Steenbakkers, Piet, trans. Moreau, Pierre-François, intro. and notes Moreau, Pierre-François and Steenbakkers, Piet. (Paris : Presses Universitaires de France, 2020).Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Akkerman, Fokke. 1977. Spinoza’s tekort aan woorden: Humanistische aspecten van zijn schrijverschap, Mededelingen vanwege Het Spinozahuis 36. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Akkerman, Fokke. 1980. Studies in the Posthumous Works of Spinoza. PhD thesis Groningen University. http://hdl.handle.net/11370/b7aaa2e2-3561-4892-afd7-fb9daca9562b.Google Scholar
1987. “La Latinité de Spinoza et l’authenticité du texte du Tractatus de intellectus emendatione,” Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques 71: 23–29.Google Scholar
Akkerman, Fokke, and Steenbakkers, Piet, eds. 2005. Spinoza to the Letter: Studies in Words, Texts and Books. Brill: Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albiac, Gabriel. 1987. La sinagoga vacía: Un estudio de las fuentes marranas del spinozismo. Madrid, Hiperión.Google Scholar
Aler, Jan, ed. 1965. Catalogus van de Bibliotheek der Vereniging het Spinozahuis te Rijnsburg. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Allison, Henry E. 1987. Benedict de Spinoza: An Introduction, revised edition. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Alsted, Johann-Heinrich. 1649. Encyclopedia, 4 vols. Lyons (first edition Herborn, 1630).Google Scholar
Althusser, L. 1997. “The Only Materialist Tradition, Part I.” In The New Spinoza, ed. Montag, Warren and Stolze, Ted: 320. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Altmann, A. 1966. “Moses Mendelssohn on Leibniz and Spinoza.” In Studies in Rationalism, Judaism and Universalism, ed. Loewe, R.: 1345. London: Routledge and Keagan Paul.Google Scholar
Andala, R. 1712. “Dissertatio de unione mentis et corporis physica.” In Dissertationum philosophicarum pentas: 159–63. Franeker: Apud Franciscum Halman.Google Scholar
Andala, R. 1719. Cartesius verus spinozismi eversor, et physicae experimentalis architectus. Franequerae: ex officina W. Bleck.Google Scholar
Andrault, R. 2014. La Vie selon la raison: Physiologie et métaphysique chez Spinoza et Leibniz. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Andrault, R., and Lærke, M., eds. 2018. Steno and the Philosophers. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Andrault, R., Lærke, M., and Moreau, P.-F., eds. 2014. Spinoza/Leibniz, Rencontres, Controverses, Réceptions. Paris: Presses universitaires de Paris-Sorbonne.Google Scholar
Antistius, Lucius (Constans). 1991. Du droit des ecclésiastiques, ed. and trans. V. Butori. Caen: Université de Caen.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. 1964–66. Summa Theologiae, 60 vols. London: Eyre and Spottiswoode.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. 1981. Summa Theologiae, trans. English Dominican Fathers. London: Burns, Oates, and Washburne (1912–36; New York: Benziger, 1947–48; New York: Christian Classics, 1981 [cited as ST].Google Scholar
Ariew, Roger. 1987. “Review of Jonathan Bennett’s A Study of Spinoza’s Ethics,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47: 649–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ariew, Roger. 1990. “The Infinite in Spinoza’s Philosophy.” In Spinoza: Issues and Directions, ed. Curley, E. and Moreau, P.-F.: 1631. Leiden: Brill, 1990.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . 1963. Categories and De Interpretation, ed. and trans. Ackrill, J. L.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle, 2 vols., ed. Barnes, Jonathan. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Arlig, Andrew. 2015. “Medieval Mereology.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Zalta, Edward N.. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2015/entries/mereology-medieval/.Google Scholar
Arnauld, Antoine, and Nicole, Pierre. 1662. La logique, ou l’art de penser. Paris.Google Scholar
Arnauld, Antoine, and Nicole, Pierre. 1996. Logic or the Art of Thinking, trans. Buroker, Jill Vance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aubert de Versé, N. 1685. L’Impie convaincu ou dissertation contre Spinosa. Amsterdam: Jean Crelle.Google Scholar
Aubrey, J. 1898. Brief Lives, 2 vols., ed. Clarke, A.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Austin, Kenneth. 2007. From Judaism to Calvinism: the Life and Writings of Immanuel Tremellius. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Attal, J. 2010. La Non-excommunication de Jacques Lacan: Quand la psychanalyse a perdu Spinoza. Paris: l’Unebévue.Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis. 1857–74. The Works of Francis Bacon, 15 vols., eds. Spedding, J., Ellis, R. L., and Heath, D. D.. London: Longmans and Co.Google Scholar
Banchetti-Robino, Marina Paola. 2012. “The Ontological Function of First-Order and Second-Order Corpuscles in the Chemical Philosophy of Robert Boyle: The Redintegration of Potassium Nitrate,” Foundations of Chemistry: Philosophical, Historical and Interdisciplinary Studies of Chemistry 14.3: 221–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartuschat, Wolfgang. 1992. Spinozas Theorie des Menschen. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Beiser, F. 1987. The Fate of Reason: German Philosophy from Kant to Fichte. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, D. 1984. Spinoza in Germany from 1670 to the Age of Goethe. London: Institute of Germanic Studies.Google Scholar
Bencini, D. 1720. Tractatio historico-polemica. Torino: In Regio Taurinensi Atheneo.Google Scholar
Bennett, Jonathan. 1984. A Study of Spinoza’s Ethics. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Bennett, Jonathan. 1990. “Spinoza and Teleology: A Reply to Curley.” In Spinoza: Issues and Directions, eds. Curley, Edwin and Moreau, Pierre-François: 5357 Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Bennett, Jonathan. 1993. “Eight Questions about Spinoza.” In Spinoza on Knowledge and the Human Mind, ed. Yovel, Yirmiyahu. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Bennett, Jonathan. 1996. “Spinoza’s Metaphysics.” In The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza, first edition, ed. Garrett, Don: 6188. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bensaude-Vincent, Bernadette, and Newman, William R., eds. 2007. The Artificial and the Natural: An Evolving Polarity. Dibner Institute Studies in the History of Science and Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentley, Jerry H. 1983. Humanists and Holy Writ, New Testament Scholarship in the Renaissance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah. 1982. Against the Current. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Berti, Silvia, ed. and trans. 1994. Trattato dei tre impostori: La vita e lo spirito del Signor Benedetto de Spinoza. Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Beverland, Hadrianus. 1679. De peccato originali dissertatio. Leiden: Gaesbeeck.Google Scholar
Biasutti, Franco. 1979. La dottrina della scienza in Spinoza. Bologna: Pàtron Editore.Google Scholar
Bidney, David. 1940. The Psychology and Ethics of Spinoza: A Study in the History and Logic of Ideas. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bienenstock, M. 2008. “Herder et Spinoza.” In Spinoza au XIXe siècle, eds. Tosel, A., Moreau, P.-F., and Salem, J.: 4761. Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billecoq, Alain. 2016. Spinoza ou l’ “athée vertueux.” Montreuil: Les Temps des Cerises.Google Scholar
Bloch, O. 1977. “Marx: Renouvier et l’histoire du matérialisme,” La Pensée 191: 342.Google Scholar
Bloksma, Nanne. 2018. Spinoza: A Miraculously Healthy Philosopher. Mededelingen vanwege het Spinozahuis, vol. 113. Rijnsburg: Uitgeverij Spinozahuis.Google Scholar
Bodian, Miriam. 1997. Hebrews of the Portuguese Nation: Conversos and Community in Early Modern Amsterdam. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Bolland, G. J. P. J. 1899. Spinoza: Rede tot inwijding van het herstelde Spinozahuis te Rijnsburg op den 24 Maart 1899 uitgesproken. Leiden: Adriani.Google Scholar
Bonke, Hans. 1987. “Portugezen op Vlooyenburg.” In Êxodo: Portugezen in Amsterdam 1600–1680, eds. Kistemaker, Renée and Levie, Tirtsah: 3241. Amsterdam: Amsterdams Historisch Museum/De Bataafsche Leeuw.Google Scholar
Borrichius, Olaus. 1983 Itinerarium 1660–1665, 4 vols., ed. Schepelern, H. D.. Copenhagen: Reitzel/Brill.Google Scholar
Bos, E. P., and Krop, H. A., eds. 1993. Franco Burgersdijk (1590–1635). Studies in the History of Ideas in the Low Countries. Amsterdam: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bos, H. J. M. et al., eds. 1980. Studies on Christiaan Huygens: Invited Papers from the Symposium on the Life and Work of Christiaan Huygens, Amsterdam, 22–25 August 1979. Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger B. V.Google Scholar
Bossers, Anton. 1986. “Nil volentibus arduum: Lodewijk Meyer en Adriaan Koerbagh.” In Opstellen over de Koninklijke Bibliotheek en andere studies: Bundel samengesteld door medewerkers van dr. C. Reedijk, ed. Tichelaar, P. A.: 374–83. Hilversum: Verloren.Google Scholar
Bossuet, J.-B. 1681. Discours sur l’histoire universelle. Paris: Sebastien Mabre-Cramoisy.Google Scholar
Boucher, W. I. 2002. Spinoza in English: A Bibliography from the Seventeenth Century to the Present. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Bourel, D. 1988. “Spinoza et Mendelssohn en 1755,” Revue de métaphysique et de morale 93.2: 208–14.Google Scholar
Boyle, Robert. 1661. Tentamina quaedam physiologica, diversis temporibus et occasionibus conscripta: A Latin translation of Certain Physiological Essays, Written at Distant Times, and on Several Occasions. London.Google Scholar
Boyle, Robert. 1662. New experiments physico-mechanicall, second edition. Oxford.Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert. 1976. “Adequacy and the Individuation of Ideas in Spinoza’s Ethics,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 14: 147–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brett, G. S. 1965. Brett’s History of Psychology, revised edition, ed. Peters, R. S.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Broad, C. D. 1930. Five Types of Ethical Theory. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Brown, Raymond. 1997. An Introduction to the New Testament. New York: Doubleday/Anchor.Google Scholar
Brunschvicg, Léon.1951. Spinoza et ses contemporains, fourth edition. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Bunge, Wiep van. 2005. From Stevin to Spinoza. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Bunge, Wiep van. 2009. “Spinoza Past and Present.” In Insiders and Outsiders in Seventeenth-Century Philosophy, eds. Rogers, G. A. J., Sorell, T., and Kraye, J.: 223–37. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bunge, W. van, Krop, H., Leeuwenburgh, B., van Ruler, H., Schuurman, P., and Wielema, M., eds. 2003. Dictionary of Seventeenth and Eighteenth-Century Dutch Philosophers, 2 vols. Bristol: Thoemmes.Google Scholar
Bunge, W. van, Krop, H., Steenbakkers, P., and Van de Ven, J., eds. 2011. The Continuum Companion to Spinoza. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Burgersdijk, Frank. 1626. Institutionum logicarum libri duo. Accedit Adriani Heerboord Synopseos logicae Burgersdicianae explicatio: Unà cum ejusdem autoris Praxi lógica. London: Roger Daniels.Google Scholar
Caird, J. 1888. Spinoza. London: William Blackwood and Sons.Google Scholar
Calvetti, Carla Gallicet. 1972. Spinoza lettore del Machiavelli. Milan: Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuora.Google Scholar
Cantor, Georg. 1996. Foundations of a General Theory of the Manifolds: A Mathematico-Philosophical Investigation into the Theory of the Infinite. In From Kant to Hilbert, vol. II, ed. Ewald, William: 878919. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Carlisle, Clare. 2015. “Spinoza on Eternal Life,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 89: 6996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carraud, Vincent. 2002. Causa sive Ratio: La Raison de la cause, de Suarez à Leibniz. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carriero, John. 1995. “On the Relationship between Mode and Substance in Spinoza’s Metaphysics,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 33: 245–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carriero, John. 2005Spinoza on Final Causality,” Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 2: 105–47.Google Scholar
Carriero, John. 2018. “The Highest Good and Perfection in Spinoza.” In The Oxford Handbook of Spinoza, ed. Della Rocca, Michael: 240–71. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Casey, Maurice. 1998. Aramaic Sources of Mark’s Gospel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Casey, Maurice. 2010. Jesus of Nazareth: An Independent Historian’s Account of his Life and Teaching. New York: T&T Clark International.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles-Daubert, Françoise. 1998. Les libertins érudits au 17e siècle. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles-Daubert, Françoise. 1999. Le “Traité des trois imposteurs” et “L’Esprit de Spinosa”: Philosophie clandestine entre 1678 et 1768. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation.Google Scholar
Chaui, M. 2000. A Nervura do Real: Imanência e Liberdade em Espinosa. Rio de Janeiro: Companhia das Letras.Google Scholar
Cherbury, , Edward Herbert of. 1624/1937. De Veritate, Prout Distinguitur a Revelatione, a Verisimili, a Possibili, Et a Falso. Bristol: J. W. Arrowsmith Ltd.Google Scholar
Citton, Y. 2006. L’Envers de la liberté: L’invention d’un imaginaire spinoziste dans la France des Lumières. Paris: Éditions Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Clericuzio, Antonio.1990. “A Redefinition of Boyle’s Chemistry and Corpuscular Philosophy,” Annals of Science 47: 561–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colerus, (Johannes Köhler). 1705. Korte, dog waaragtige levens-beschryving van Benedictus de Spinosa, uit autentique stukken en mondeling getuigenis van nog levende personen opgestelt. Amsterdam: Lindenberg. [1706 French translation: La Vie de B. de Spinosa, tirée des écrits de ce fameux philosophe, et du témoignage de plusieurs personnes dignes de foi, qui l’ont connu particuliérement. The Hague: Johnson. 1706 English translation (from the French): The Life of Benedict de Spinosa. London: Bragg.]Google Scholar
Condillac, E. B. de. 1798. Traité des systems, in Oeuvres complètes, vol. II. Paris: Houel.Google Scholar
Cotten, Jean-Pierre. “Spinoza et Victor Cousin.” In Spinoza au XIXe siècle, eds. Tosel, A., Moreau, P.-F., and Salem, J.: 231–43. Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne.Google Scholar
Cousin, Victor. 1838. “Spinoza et la synagogue des juifs portugais.” In Fragments philosophiques, vol. 2: 163–66. Paris: Ladrange.Google Scholar
Crescas, Hasdai. 1990. Or ha-Shem [Hebrew: Light of the Lord], ed. Fisher, Shlomo. Jerusalem: Ramot.Google Scholar
Cristofolini, Paolo. 1995. “The Spinozistic Heresy: The Debate on the Tractatus Theologico-Politicus, 1670–1677, and the Immediate Reception of Spinozism.” In Proceedings of the International Cortona Seminar: 2535. Amsterdam: APA-Holland University Press.Google Scholar
Cropsey, Joseph, and Strauss, Leo, eds. 1981. History of Political Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Curley, Edwin M. 1969. Spinoza’s Metaphysics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curley, Edwin M. 1973a. “Experience in Spinoza’s Theory of Knowledge.” In Spinoza: A Collection of Critical Essays, ed. Grene, Marjorie: 2559. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Curley, Edwin M. 1973b. “Spinoza’s Moral Philosophy.” In Spinoza: A Collection of Critical Essays, ed. Grene, Marjorie: 354–76. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Curley, Edwin M. 1978. “Spinoza as an Expositor of Descartes.” In Speculum Spinozanum 1677–1977, ed. Hessing, Siegfried: 133–42. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Curley, Edwin M. 1988. Behind the Geometrical Method: A Reading of Spinoza’s Ethics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curley, Edwin M. 1990a. “Notes on a Neglected Masterpiece, II: The Theological-Political Treatise as a Prolegomenon to the Ethics.” In Central Themes in Early Modern Philosophy, eds. Cover, J. A. and Kulstad, Mark: 109–59. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Curley, Edwin M. 1990b. “On Bennett’s Spinoza: The Issue of ‘Teleology’.” In Spinoza: Issues and Directions, ed. Curley, Edwin and Moreau, Pierre-François: 3952. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curley, Edwin M. 1991a. “A Good Man Is Hard to Find,” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 65: 2945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curley, Edwin M. 1991b. “The State of Nature and Its Law in Hobbes and Spinoza,” Philosophical Topics 19: 91117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curley, Edwin M. 1991c. “On Bennett’s Interpretation of Spinoza’s Monism.” In God and Nature: Spinoza’s Metaphysics, ed. Yovel, Yirmiyahu. Spinoza by 2000: The Jerusalem Conferences: 3551. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Curley, Edwin M. 1992. “‘I durst not write so boldly’ or How to Read Hobbes’s Theological-Political Treatise.” In Hobbes e Spinoza: Scienza e politica, ed. Bostrenghi, D.: 497–62. Napoli: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar
Curley, Edwin M. 1994a. “Spinoza on Truth,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 72: 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curley, Edwin M. 1994b. “Notes on a Neglected Masterpiece (I): Spinoza and the Science of Hermeneutics.” In Spinoza: The Enduring Questions, ed. Hunter, Graeme: 6499. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Curley, Edwin M. 2002. “Maimonides, Spinoza, and the Book of Job.” In Jewish Themes in Spinoza’s Philosophy, eds. Ravven, Heidi and Goodman, Lenn: 147–86. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Curley, Edwin M. 2010. “Spinoza’s Exchange with Albert Burgh.” In Spinoza’s Theological-Political Treatise: A Critical Guide, eds. Melamed, Y. Y. and Rosenthal, M. A.: 1128. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curley, Edwin M. 2014. “Spinoza’s Contribution to Biblical Scholarship.” In Baruch de Spinoza, Theologisch-politischer Traktat, ed. Höffe, Otfried: 109126. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Curley, Edwin M. 2015. “Resurrecting Leo Strauss.” In Reading Between the Lines: Leo Strauss and the History of Early Modern Philosophy, ed. Schroeder, Winfried: 129–70. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Curley, Edwin, and Walski, Gregory. 1999. “Spinoza’s Necessitarianism Reconsidered.” In New Essays on the Rationalists, eds. Gennaro, R. J. and Huenemann, C.: 241–62. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Da Costa, Uriel. 1993. Examination of Pharisaic Traditions: Exame das tradições phariseas, facsimile of the unique copy in the Royal Library of Copenhagen, supplemented by da Silva, Semuel’s Treatise on the Immortality of the Soul: Tratado da immortalidade da alma, trans., notes, and intro. Salomon, H. P. and Sassoon, I. S. D.. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dagron, T. 2004. “Introduction.” In J. Toland, Lettres à Serena et autres textes, ed. Dagron, T.: 760. Paris: Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
Dagron, T. 2009. Toland and Leibniz: L’invention du néo-spinozisme. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Damasio, Antonio. 2003. Looking for Spinoza: Joy, Sorrow, and the Feeling Brain. London: William Heinemann.Google Scholar
D’Ancona, J. 1940. “Komst der Marranen in Noord-Nederland: De Portugese gemeenten te Amsterdam tot de vereniging (1639).” In Geschiedenis der Joden in Nederland, eds. Brugmans, H. and Frank, A.: 201–69. Amsterdam: Van Holkema & Warendorf.Google Scholar
Daudin, Henri. 1948. “Spinoza et la science expérimentale: Sa discussion de l’expérience de Boyle,” Revue d’Histoire des Sciences 2: 179–90.Google Scholar
De Dijn, Herman. 2011. “Ethics as Medicine for the Mind (5p1–20).” In Spinoza’s Ethics: A Collective Commentary, eds. Hampe, Michael, Renz, Ursula, and Schnepf, Robert: 265–80. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
De Vet, J. J. V. M. 2005. “Salomon Dierquens, auteur du Stelkonstige reeckening van den regenboog et du Reeckening van kanssen.” In Spinoza to the Letter: Studies in Words, Texts and Books, eds. Akkerman, Fokke and Steenbakkers, Piet: 169–88. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Delahunty, R. J. 1985. Spinoza: Arguments of the Philosophers. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Delbos, V. 1893. Le Problème moral dans la philosophie de Spinoza dans l’histoire du spinozisme. Paris: Ancienne Librairie Gemer Baillière.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. 1967. Spinoza et le problème de l’expression. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. 1968. Différence et repetition. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. 1988. Spinoza: Practical Philosophy, trans. Hurley, R.. San Francisco: City Lights Books.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. 1992. Expressionism in Philosophy: Spinoza, trans. Joughin, Martin. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. 1995. Negotiations: 1972–1990, trans. Joughin, Martin.. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Della Rocca, Michael. 1991. “Causation and Spinoza’s Claim of Identity,” History of Philosophy Quarterly, 8: 265–76.Google Scholar
Della Rocca, Michael. 1996. Representation and the Mind-Body Problem in Spinoza. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Della Rocca, Michael. 2002. “Spinoza’s Substance Monism.” In Spinoza: Metaphysical Themes, eds. Biro, John and Koistinen, Olli: 1137. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Della Rocca, Michael. 2003a. “A Rationalist Manifesto: Spinoza and the Principle of Sufficient Reason,” Philosophical Topics 31: 7593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Della Rocca, Michael. 2003b. “The Power of an Idea: Spinoza’s Critique of Pure Will,” Nous 37: 200–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Della Rocca, Michael. 2004. “Egoism and the Imitation of Affects in Spinoza.” In Spinoza on Reason and the “Free Man,” eds. Yovel, Yirmiyahu and Segal, Gideon: 123–47. New York: Little Room Press.Google Scholar
Della Rocca, Michael. 2007. “Spinoza and the Metaphysics of Scepticism,” Mind 116: 851–74.Google Scholar
Della Rocca, Michael. 2008a. “Rationalism Run Amok: Representation and the Reality of Emotions in Spinoza.” In Interpreting Spinoza, ed. Huenemann, Charlie: 2652. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Della Rocca, Michael. 2008b. Spinoza. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Della Rocca, Michael. 2010. “Getting His Hands Dirty: Spinoza’s Criticism of the Rebel.” In Spinoza’s Theological-Political Treatise, eds. Melamed, Yitzhak and Rosenthal, Michael: 168–91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Della Rocca, Michael. 2013. “The Taming of Philosophy.” In Philosophy and Its History: Methods and Aims in the Study of Early Modern Philosophy, eds. Lærke, M., Schliesser, E., and Smith, J. E. H.: 178208. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Della Rocca, Michael. 2015. “Interpreting Spinoza: The Real Is the Rational,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 53: 525–35.Google Scholar
Della Rocca, Michael. 2016. “Review of Yitzhak Melamed’s Spinoza’s Metaphysics: Substance and Thought,” Philosophical Review 125.2: 292–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2021. “Perseverance, Power, and Eternity: Purely Positive Essence and Spinoza’s Naturalism,” Crisis and Critique 8: 307–25.Google Scholar
Den Uyl, Douglas. 1983. Power, State and Freedom. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Denzinger, Henry. 2007. Sources of Catholic Dogma, trans. Deferrari, Roy. Fitzwilliam: Loreto Publications.Google Scholar
Descartes, René. 1964–76. Oeuvres de Descartes, 12 vols., eds. Adam, Charles and Tannery, Paul. Paris: J. Vrin [cited as AT].Google Scholar
Descartes, René. 1985. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, 2 vols., eds. and trans. Cottingham, John, Stoothoff, Robert, and Murdoch, Dugald. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press [cited as CSM].Google Scholar
Dibon, Paul. 1954. La philosophie néerlandaise au Siècle d’Or. Tome I: L’enseignement philosophique dans les universités à l’époque précartésienne (1575–1650). Publications de l’institut Français d’Amsterdam, Maison Descartes, no. 21. Paris: Elsevier Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Diderot, D. 1875–77. Œuvres completes, 20 vols., ed. Assézat, J. and Tourneux, M.. Paris: Garnier.Google Scholar
Diderot, D., and le Rond D’Alembert, J., eds. 1751–72. Encyclopédie ou Dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers, 17 vols. Paris: Briasson, David, Le Breton, Durand.Google Scholar
Donagan, Alan. 1980. “Spinoza’s Dualism.” In The Philosophy of Baruch Spinoza, ed. Kennington, Richard: 89102. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Donagan, Alan. 1989. Spinoza. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Doney, Willis. 1975. “Spinoza on Philosophical Skepticism.” In Spinoza: Essays in Interpretation, eds. Mandelbaum, Maurice and Freeman, Eugene: 139–57. LaSalle: Open Court.Google Scholar
Duchesneau, François. 1974. “Du modèle cartésien au modèle spinozist e de l’être vivant,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 3: 539–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duijkerius, J. 1691. Het leven van Philopater: Opgewiegt in Voetiaensche Talmeryen en groot gemaeckt in de Verborgentheden heden der Coccejanen. Groeningen: Van der Brug.Google Scholar
Duijkerius, J. 1697. Vervolg van’t leven van Philopater: Geredded uit de verborgentheeden der Coccejanen. Groeningen: Van der Brug.Google Scholar
1991. Het leven van Philopater en Vervolg van ’t leven van Philopater: Een spinozistische sleutelroman uit 1691/1697, ed. Maréchal, Gerardine. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Dungan, David Laird. 1999. A History of the Synoptic Problem. New York: Doubleday/Anchor.Google Scholar
Dunin-Borkowski, S. von. 1910. Der Junge de Spinoza: Leben und Werdegang im Lichte der Weltphilosophie. Münster: Aschendorf.Google Scholar
Dunin-Borkowski, S. von. 1910 and 1933–36. Spinoza, 4 vols. Münster: Aschendorf.Google Scholar
Dunin-Borkowski, S. von. 1933. “Die Physik Spinozas.” In Septimana Spinozana: Acta conventus oecumenici in memoriam Bendicti de Spinoza diei natalis trecentissimi Hagae Comitis habiti, curis Societatis Spinozanae edita: 85101. The Hague: Societas Spinozana.Google Scholar
Dutka, Jacques. 1953. “Spinoza and the Theory of Probability,” Scripta Mathematica 19: 2433.Google Scholar
Ehrman, Bart. 1993. The Orthodox Corruption of Scripture: The Effect of Early Christological Controversies on the Text of the New Testament. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ekkart, Rudi. 1999. Spinoza in beeld: Het onbekende gezicht [Spinoza in Portrait: The Unknown Face]. Voorschoten: Vereniging Het Spinozahuis.Google Scholar
Ellsiepen, Christof. 2011. “The Three Types of Knowledge (2p38–47).” In Spinoza’s Ethics: A Collective Commentary, eds. Hampe, Michael, Renz, Ursula, and Schnepf, Robert: 129–44. Leiden/Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Eusebius of Caesarea, . 1926. Ecclesiastical History, trans. Lake, Kirsopp and Oulton, J. E. L.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Eustachius of St. Paul. 1609. Summa philosophica quadripartite. Paris: Carolus Chastellain.Google Scholar
Farkas, Jerneja, von Haehling, Stephan, Kalantar-Zadeh, Kamyar, Morley, John E., Anker, Stefan D., and Lainscak, Mitja. 2013. “Cachexia as a Major Public Health Problem: Frequent, Costly, and Deadly,” Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle 4: 173–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joseph A., Fitzmyer, ed. 1992. Romans, vol 33 of The Anchor Bible. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Joseph A., Fitzmyer, 1993. “The Consecutive Meaning of EΦ’ Ω in Romans 5:12,” New Testament Studies 39: 321–39.Google Scholar
Förster, E. 2012. “Goethe’s Spinozism.” In Spinoza and German Idealism, eds. Förster, E. and Melamed, Y.: 8599. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Förster, E., and Melamed, Y.. 2012. “Introduction.” In Spinoza and German Idealism, eds. Förster, E. and Melamed, Y.: 16. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, M. 2012. “Herder and Spinoza.” In Spinoza and German Idealism, eds. Förster, E. and Melamed, Y.: 5984. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucher de Careil, L. A. 1854. “Mémoire sur la Refutation inédite de Spinoza par Leibniz.” In Réfutation inédite de Spinoza, ed. Leibniz, G. W. and ed. and trans. Foucher de Careil, A.: ICVI. Paris: Brière.Google Scholar
Frampton, T. L. 2006. Spinoza and the Rise of Historical Criticism of the Bible. New York: T&T Clark.Google Scholar
Francks, Richard. 1985. “Caricatures in the History of Philosophy: The Case of Spinoza.” In Philosophy, Its History and Historiography, ed. Holland, A. J.. Royal Institute of Philosophy Conferences, vol. 1983: 179–94. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Freedman, David Noel. 1987. “‘Who Is Like Thee among the Gods?’ The Religion of Early Israel.” In Ancient Israelite Religion, eds. Miller, Patrick D. Jr., Hanson, Paul D., and McBride, S. Dean: 315–35. Philadelphia: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
Freedman, David Noel. 1992. Anchor Bible Dictionary. New York: Doubleday [ABD]Google Scholar
Freedman, David Noel, and Geoghegan, Jeffrey. 2006. “Martin Noth: Retrospect and Prospect.” In The History of Israel’s Traditions, the Heritage of Martin Noth, eds. McKenzie, Steven and Graham, Patrick: 128–52. Sheffield: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Fréret, Nicholas. 1986. Lettre de Thrasybule à Leucippe, ed. Landucci, S.. Florence: Olschki.Google Scholar
Freudenthal, Jacob. 1899. Die Lebensgeschichte Spinoza’s in Quellenschriften, Urkunden und nichtamtlichen Nachrichten. Leipzig: Von Veit.Google Scholar
Freudenthal, Jakob. 1904. Spinoza: Sein Leben und seine Lehre, Band I: Das Leben Spinozas. Stuttgart: Frommann.Google Scholar
Fuks, Leo. 1952. “Drie recente vondsten uit een Spinoza-bibliotheek,” Amstelodamum 39: 132–38.Google Scholar
Gabbey, Alan. 1973. “Review of W. L. Scott, The Conflict Between Atomism and Conservation Theory 1644–1860, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 4: 373–85.Google Scholar
Gabbey, Alan. 1980. “Force and Inertia in the Seventeenth Century: Descartes and Newton.” In Descartes: Philosophy Mathematics and Physics, ed. Gaukroger, Stephen: 230320. Sussex: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Gabbey, Alan. 1992. “Newton’s Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy: A Treatise on ‘Mechanics’?” In An Investigation of Difficult Things: Essays on Newton and the History of the Exact Sciences in Honour of D. T. Whiteside, eds. Harman, P. M. and Shapiro, Alan E.: 305–22. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gabbey, Alan. 2007a. “Spinoza on the Natural and the Artificial.” In The Artificial and the Natural: An Evolving Polarity, eds. Bensaude-Vincent, Bernadette and Newman, William R.. Dibner Institute Studies in the History of Science and Technology: 225–37. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gabbey, Alan. 2007b. “Spinoza scolastique et la méthodologie des sciences.” In Conceptions de la science: Hier, aujourd’hui, demain. Hommage à Marjorie Grene, sous la direction de Jean Gayon et Richard M. Burian, avec la collaboration de Marie-Claude Lorne, eds., Jean, Gayon and Burian, Richard M.: 242–58. Bruxelles: Editions Ousia.Google Scholar
Garber, Daniel. 1992. Descartes’ Metaphysical Physics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Garber, Daniel. 2008. “Should Spinoza Have Published His Philosophy?” In Interpreting Spinoza: Critical Essays, ed. Huenemann, Charlie. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Garber, Daniel. 2015. “Superheroes in the History of Philosophy: Spinoza, Super-Rationalist,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 53.3: 507–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garber, Daniel, and Cohen, Lesley. 1982. “A Point of Order: Analysis, Synthesis and Descartes’s Principles,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 64: 136–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Aaron V. 2003. Meaning in Spinoza’s Method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Don. 1979. “Spinoza’s ‘Ontological’ Argument,” Philosophical Review 88: 198223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Don. 1990a. “‘A Free Man Always Acts Honestly, Not Deceptively’: Freedom and the Good in Spinoza’s Ethics.” In Spinoza: Issues and Directions, eds. Curley, Edwin and Moreau, Pierre-François: 221–38. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Garrett, Don. 1990b. “Ethics Ip5: Shared Attributes and the Basis of Spinoza’s Monism.” In Central Themes in Early Modern Philosophy: Essays Presented to Jonathan Bennett, eds. Cover, J. A. and Kulstad, Mark: 69107. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Garrett, Don. 1990c. “Truth, Method, and Correspondence in Spinoza and Leibniz,” Studia Spinozana 6: 1343.Google Scholar
Garrett, Don. 1991. “Spinoza’s Necessitarianism.” In God and Nature: Spinoza’s Metaphysics, ed. Yovel, Yirmiyahu. Spinoza by 2000: The Jerusalem Conferences: 191218. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Garrett, Don. 1994. “Spinoza’s Theory of Metaphysical Individuation.” In Individuation in Early Modern Philosophy, eds. Barber, Kenneth F. and Gracia, Jorge J. E.: 73101. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Garrett, Don. 1996. “Spinoza’s Ethical Theory.” In The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza, first edition, ed. Garrett, Don: 267314. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Garrett, Don. 1998. “Teleology in Spinoza and Early Modern Rationalism.” In New Essays on the Rationalists, eds. Gennaro, Rocco and Huenmann, Charles: 310–35. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Garrett, Don. 2002. “Spinoza’s Conatus Argument.” In Spinoza: Metaphysical Themes, eds. Koistinen, Olli and Biro, John: 127–58. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Garrett, Don. 2008. “Representation and Consciousness in Spinoza’s Naturalistic Theory of the Imagination.” In Interpreting Spinoza: Critical Essays, ed. Huenemann, Charles: 425. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Garrett, Don. 2009. “The Essence of the Body and the Part of the Mind That Is Eternal.” In A Companion to Spinoza’s Ethics, ed. Koistinen, Olli: 284302. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Don. 2010. “‘Promising’ Ideas: Hobbes and Contract in Spinoza’s Political Philosophy.” In Spinoza’s Theological-Political Treatise: A Critical Guide, eds. Melamed, Yitzhak and Rosenthal, Michael: 192209. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Don. 2017. “The Indiscernibility of Identicals and the Transitivity of Identity in Spinoza’s Logic of the Attributes.” In Spinoza’s Ethics: A Critical Guide, ed. Melamed, Yitzhak Y.: 1242. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Don. 2018. Nature and Necessity in Spinoza’s Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gawlick, Günter 1995. “Spinozismus.” In Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, vol. 9, eds. Ritter, Joachim and Gründer, Karlfried: 13981401. Basel: Schwabe.Google Scholar
Jean, Gayon, and Burian, Richard M., eds. 2007. Conceptions de la science: Hier, aujourd’hui, demain. Hommage à Marjorie Grene, sous la direction de Jean Gayon et Richard M. Burian, avec la collaboration de Marie-Claude Lorne. Bruxelles: Editions Ousia, 2007.Google Scholar
Geach, Peter. 1971. “Spinoza and the Divine Attributes,” Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement: 15–27.Google Scholar
Gebhardt, C. 1905. Abhandlung über die Verbesserung des Verstandes: Eine entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchung. Heidelberg: Carl WinterGoogle Scholar
Gersonides, . 1560. Milhamot ha-Shem. Riva di Trento.Google Scholar
Gersonides, . 1984–99. The Wars of the Lord, 3 vols., ed. Feldman, Seymour. Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society.Google Scholar
Giancotti Boscherini, E. 1971. Lexicon Spinozanum, 2 vols. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibert, P. 2010. L’Invention critique de la Bible XVe-XVIIIe siècle. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Gillispie, Charles Couston, ed. 1970–80. Dictionary of Scientific Biography, 16 vols. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
Goclenius, Rodolphus. 1613. Lexicon philosophicum, quo tanquam clave philosophiae fores aperiuntur, informatum opera &) studio Rodolphi Goclenii senioris, in Academia Mauritania, quae est Marchioburgi, Philosophiae Professons primarii. Frankfurt: Matthias Becker (reprinted Hildesheim: Georg Olms [in same volume: Goclenius’s Lexicon philosophicum Graecum, 1615]).Google Scholar
Goethe, J. W., and Jacobi, F. H.. 1846. Briefwechsel zwischen Goethe und F. H. Jacobi, ed. Jacobi, M.. Leipzig: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Goff, P., ed. 2012. Spinoza on Monism. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Goodman, Nelson, and Leonard, Henry S. 1940. “The Calculus of Individuals and Its Uses,” Journal of Symbolic Logic 5: 4555.Google Scholar
Gootjes, Albert. 2016. “Sources inédites sur Spinoza: La correspondance entre Johannes Bouwmeester et Johannes Georgius Graevius,” Bulletin de Bibliographie Spinoziste 38, Archives de Philosophie 79: 817–19.Google Scholar
Gootjes, Albert. 2018. “The First Orchestrated Attack on Spinoza: Johannes Melchioris and the Cartesian Network in Utrecht,” Journal of the History of Ideas 79: 2343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gootjes, Albert. 2020. “Spinoza between French Libertines and Dutch Cartesians: The 1673 Utrecht Visit,” Modern Intellectual History. 17: 591–617. doi.org/10.1017/S1479244318000471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gootjes, Albert. 2019. “The ‘Collegie der sçavanten’: A Seventeenth-Century Cartesian Scholarly Society in Utrecht.” In Enlightened Religion: From Confessional Churches to Polite Piety in the Dutch Republic, eds. Spaans, Joke and Touber, Jetze: 156–82. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Greenslade, S. L., ed. 1963. The Cambridge History of the Bible: The West from the Reformation to the Present Day, vol. 3 of The Cambridge History of the Bible. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grene, Marjorie, and Nails, Debra, eds. 1986. Spinoza and the Sciences. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 91. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grene, Marjorie, and Watson, Richard, eds. 1995. Malebranche’s First and Last Critics: Simon Foucher and Dortous de Mairan. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Grotius, H. 2001. De imperio summarum potestatum circa sacra, 2 vols, ed. and trans. van Dam, H.-J.. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Grunwald, M. 1897. Spinoza in Deutschland. Berlin: S. Calvary.Google Scholar
Gueroult, Martial. 1968. Spinoza I: Dieu. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Gueroult, Martial. 1974. Spinoza II: L’âme. Paris: Aubier.Google Scholar
Guggenheim, Heinrich, trans. with commentary. 2005. Seder Olam, the Rabbinic View of Biblical Chronology. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Gullan-Whur, Margaret. 1998. Within Reason: A Life of Spinoza. London: Cape.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian. 1975. Why Does Language Matter to Philosophy? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, Scott, and Wiker, Benjamin. 2013. Politicizing the Bible: The Roots of Historical Criticism and the Secularization of Scripture, 1300–1700. New York: Crossroads Publishing.Google Scholar
Hall, A. Rupert, and Hall, Marie Boas. 1964. “Philosophy and Natural Philosophy: Boyle and Spinoza.” In Mélanges Alexandre Koyré II: l’Aventure de l’Esprit: 241–56. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
Hampshire, Stuart. 1994. “Truth and Correspondence in Spinoza.” In Spinoza and the Human Mind: Papers Presented at the Second Jerusalem Conference (Ethica II), ed. Yovel, Yirmiyahu: 110. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Hampshire, Stuart. 2005. Spinoza and Spinozism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hampton, Jean. 1986. Hobbes and the Social Contract Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harrisville, Roy, and Sundberg, Walter. 2002. The Bible in Modern Culture: Baruch Spinoza to Brevard Childs, second edition. Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Harvey, Warren Zev. 2010. Rabbi Hasdai Crescas [Hebrew]. Jerusalem: Zalman Shazar Center.Google Scholar
Heereboord, Adriaan. 1659. Meletemata philosophica. Leiden: Fr. Moyard.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1955. Lectures on the History of Philosophy, trans. Haldane, E. S.. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1969. The Science of Logic, trans. Miller, A. V.. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1990. Lectures on the History of Philosophy: The Lectures of 1825–1826. Vol. III: Medieval and Modern Philosophy, ed. Brown, R. F., trans. Brown, R. F. and Stewart, M.. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1995. Lectures on the History of Philosophy, 3 vols., trans. Haldane, E. S. and Simson, Frances H.. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 2007. Lectures on the Proofs of the Existence of God, trans. Hodgson, Peter C.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Herder, J. G. von. 1940. God: Some Conversations, trans. Burkhardt, F. H.. Indianapolis and New York: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Herder, J. G. von. 2002. Philosophical Writings, ed. and trans. Forster, M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Herrnstein, Richard J., and Boring, Edwin G., eds. 1965. A Source Book in the History of Psychology. Source Books in the History of the Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hessing, Siegfried, ed. 1977. Speculum Spinozanum 1677–1977. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1994. Leviathan, ed. Curley, Edwin. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Paul 2009. “Does Efficient Causation Presuppose Final Causation? Aquinas vs. Early Modern Mechanism.” In Metaphysics and the Good, ed. Jorgensen, Larry and Newlands, Samuel: 295312. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoos, Anneliese. 2000. “Self-Preservation and Love in Spinoza’s Ethics.” Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Columbia University.Google Scholar
Hubert, Christiane. 1994. Les premières refutations de Spinoza. Paris: Presses de l’Université de Paris-Sorbonne.Google Scholar
Hübner, Karolina. 2018. “Spinoza’s Unorthodox Metaphysics of the Will.” In The Oxford Handbook of Spinoza, ed. Della Rocca, Michael: 343–69. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Huet, P.-D. 1679. Demonstratio evangelica. Paris: Stephanum Michallet.Google Scholar
Hume, David. 2007. A Treatise of Human Nature, eds. Norton, David F. and Norton, Mary J.. Oxford: Clarendon Press [originally published 1739–40].Google Scholar
Hunter, Graeme. 2005. Radical Protestantism in Spinoza’s Thought. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 2001. Logical Investigations, trans. Findlay, J. N.. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Huygens, Christiaan. 1888–1950. Oeuvres complètes de Christiaan Huygens, publiées par la Société hollandaise des sciences, 22 vols., eds. de Haan, D. Bierans, Bosscha, J., Kortweg, D. J., and Vollgraff, J.. La Haye: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ibn Ezra, . 1988. Ibn Ezra’s Commentary on the Pentateuch, 5 volumes, trans. and annot. Norman Strickman and Arthur Silver. New York: Menorah Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Ibn Gabbirol, Solomon. 2001. Selected Poems of Solomon Ibn Gabirol, trans. Cole, Peter. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irgas, Yosef. 1965. Shomer Emunim [Hebrew]. Jerusalem: The Loyal Guard].Google Scholar
Isaacson, Walter. 1992. Kissinger. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Israel, Jonathan I. 2001. Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity 1650–1750. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Israel, Jonathan I. 2006. Enlightenment Contested: Philosophy, Modernity, and the Emancipation of Man, 1670–1752. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Israel, Jonathan I. 2010. “The Early Dutch and German Reactions to the TTP: Foreshadowing the Enlightenment’s More General Spinoza Reception?” In Spinoza’s Theological-Political Treatise: A Critical Guide, eds. Melamed, Yitzhak and Rosenthal, Michael: 72100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Israel, Jonathan I. 2011. Democratic Enlightenment: Philosophy, Revolution and Human Rights, 1750–1790. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobi, F. H. 1994. The Main Philosophical Writings and the Novel Allwill, trans. di Giovanni, G.. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
Jagersma, Rindert, and Dijkstra, Trude. 2013. “Uncovering Spinoza’s Printers by Means of Bibliographical Research,” Quærendo 43: 278310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, Susan. 2012. Spinoza on Philosophy, Religion and Politics: The Theologico-Political Treatise. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarrett, Charles. 1991. “Spinoza’s Denial of Mind-Body Interaction and the Explanation of Human Action,” Southern Journal of Philosophy 29.4: 465–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, Lotte. 1997a. “Johannes Monnikhoff: Bewonderaar en bestrijder van Spinoza,” Geschiedenis van de Wijsbegeerte in Nederland 7: 531.Google Scholar
Jensen, Lotte, ed. 1997b. “Kritische voorrede door Johannes Monnikhoff,” Geschiedenis van de Wijsbegeerte in Nederland 7: 3243.Google Scholar
Joachim, H. 1901. A Study of the Ethics of Spinoza: Ethica Ordine Geometrico Demonstrata. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Joachim, H. 1940. Spinoza’s Tractatus de Intellectus Emendatione: A Commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Jonas, Hans. 1973. “Spinoza and the Theory of the Organism.” In Spinoza: A Collection of Critical Essays, ed. Grene, Marjorie: 259–78. Garden City: Doubleday/Anchor Press.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Yosef. 1982. “The Social Functions of the Herem in the Portuguese Jewish Community of Amsterdam in the Seventeenth Century.” In Dutch Jewish History: Proceedings of the Symposium on the History of the Jews in the Netherlands, eds. Michman, Jozeph and Levie, Tirtsah: 111–55. Jerusalem: Institute for Research on Dutch Jewry.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Yosef. 2016. “On the Burial of Spinoza’s Grandfather and Grandmother,” Zutot: Perspectives on Jewish Culture 3: 639.Google Scholar
Keckermann, Bartholomew. 1614. Operum omnium quae extant tomus primus. Geneva: Pierre Aubert.Google Scholar
Kisner, Matthew J. 2011. Spinoza on Human Freedom: Reason, Autonomy and the Good Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kisner, Matthew J., and Youpa, Andrew, eds. 2014. Essays on Spinoza’s Ethical Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kisser, T. 2008. “Spinoza et Schelling.” In Spinoza au XIXe siècle, eds. Tosel, A., Moreau, P.-F., and Salem, J.: 7585. Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kissinger, Henry A. 1957. A World Restored: Metternich, Castlereagh and the Problems of Peace, 1812–1822. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Kissinger, Henry A. 1968. “The White Revolutionary: Reflections on Bismarck,” Daedalus 97: 888924.Google Scholar
Klein, D. B. 1970. A History of Scientific Psychology: Its Origins and Philosophical Backgrounds. New York/London: Basic Books, Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Klever, W. N. A. 1983. “Nieuwe argumenten tegen de toeschrijving van het auteurschap van de SRR en RK aan Spinoza,” Tijdschrift voor Filosofie 47: 493502.Google Scholar
Klever, W. N. A. 1990. “Anti-falsificationism: Spinoza’s Theory of Experience and Experiments.” In Spinoza: Issues and Directions, eds. Curley, Edwin and Moreau, Pierre-François: 124–35. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Kline, G. L. 1952. Spinoza in Soviet Philosophy. London: Routledge and Kegan.Google Scholar
Koerbagh, Adriaan. 2011. A Light Shining in Dark Places, to Illuminate the Main Questions of Theology and Religion, ed. and trans. Wielema, Michiel, intro. Wiep van Bunge. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Kohlenberger, H. K. 1971. “Communes conceptiones.” In Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, vol. 1, ed. Ritter, Joachim: 1024. Basel: Schwabe Verlag.Google Scholar
Koistinen, Olli. 1996. “Causality, Intensionality and Identity: Mind Body Interaction in Spinoza,” Ratio 9.1: 2338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolakowski, L. 1969. Chrétiens sans église: La conscience réligieuse et le lien confessionnel au 17e siècle. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Kortholt, Christian 1680. De tribus impostoribus magnis liber. Kiloni: Literis et Sumptibus Joachimi Reumanni.Google Scholar
Krop, Henri. 2010. “Spinozas Bibliothek.” In Spinoza im Kontext: Voraussetzungen, Werk und Wirken eines radikalen Denkers, Katalog zur Ausstellung im Interdisziplinären Zentrum für die Erforschung der Europäischen Aufklärung, eds. van Heertum, Cis and Grunert, Frank: 4758. Halle Saale: Mitteldeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
Krop, Henri. 2014. “Experientia.” In The Bloomsbury Companion to Spinoza, eds. van Bunge, Wiep, Krop, Henri, Steenbakkers, Piet, and van de Ven, Jeroen. Glossary: 213–16. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Kugel, James. 2007. How to Read the Bible: A Guide to Scripture, Then and Now. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Kulstad, Mark. 2002a. “Leibniz, Spinoza and Tschirnhaus: Metaphysics à Trois, 1675–76.” In Spinoza: Metaphysical Themes, eds. Koistinen, Olli and Biro, John: 221–40. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kulstad, Mark. 2002b. “Exploring the Middle Ground: Was Leibniz’s Conception of God Ever Spinozistic?American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76: 671–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuyper, F. 1676. Arcana atheismi revelata, philosophice & paradoxè refutata, Examine tractatus theologico-politici. Roterodami: Isaacum Naeranum.Google Scholar
Lærke, M. 2006. “À la recherche d’un homme égal à Spinoza: G. W. Leibniz et la Demonstratio evangelica de Pierre-Daniel Huet,” XVIIe siècle 232: 388410.Google Scholar
Lærke, M. 2008. Leibniz lecteur de Spinoza: La genèse d’une opposition complexe. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Lærke, M. 2010. “G. W. Leibniz’s Two Readings of the Tractatus.” In Spinoza’s Theological-Political Treatise: A Critical Guide, eds. Melamed, Yitzhak and Rosenthal, Michael: 101–27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lærke, M. 2012a. “Spinoza’s Monism? What Monism?” In Spinoza on Monism, ed. Goff, Philip: 244–61. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Lærke, M. 2012b. “Leibniz on Spinoza’s Political Philosophy.” In Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy, vol. 6, eds. Garber, D. and Rutherford, D.: 105–34. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lærke, M. 2014. “Les études spinozistes aux États-unis: Spinoza et le Principe de Raison Suffisante. Représentations, concepts, idées,” Bulletin de bibliographie Spinoziste, no. XXXVI, in Archives de Philosophie 77: 721–26.Google Scholar
Lærke, M. 2015. Les Lumières de Leibniz: Controverses avec Huet, Bayle, Regis et More. Paris: Classiques Garnier.Google Scholar
Lærke, M. 2016a. Leibniz and Spinoza. Mededelingen vanwege het Spinozahuis 111. Voorschoten: Uitgeverij Spinozahuis.Google Scholar
Lærke, M. 2016b. “Mendelssohn, Wachter et les origines du Spinoza idéaliste.” In Les métaphysiques des Lumières, eds. Girard, P., Leduc, C., and Rioux-Beaulne, M.: 135–54. Paris: Classiques Garnier.Google Scholar
Lærke, M. 2016c. “La controverse entre Grotius, Hobbes et Spinoza sur le jus circa cacra: Textes, pretexts, contextes et circonstances,” Revue de synthèse 137: 399425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lærke, M. 2018Leibniz’s Encounter with Spinoza’s Monism, October 1675 to February 1678.” In Oxford Handbook to Spinoza, ed. Della Rocca, Michael: 434–63. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lærke, M. 2020a. “French Historiographical Spinozism, 1893–2018: Delbos, Gueroult, Vernière, Moreau,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 28.3: 653–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lærke, M. 2020b. “Structural Analysis and Dianoematics: The History of (the History of) Philosophy According to Martial Gueroult,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 58.3: 581607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lærke, M. 2021. Spinoza and the Freedom of Philosophizing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lachterman, David R. 1978. “The Physics of Spinoza’s Ethics.” In Spinoza: New Perspectives, eds. Shahan, Robert W. and Biro, John: 77111. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Lagrée, Jacqueline 2004. Spinoza et le débat religieux. Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar
Lange, H. 2011. “Goethe and Spinoza: A Reconsideration,” Goethe Yearbook 18: 1133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Peyrère, Isaac. 1655: A Theological System upon the Presupposition that Men were before Adam. London.Google Scholar
Laplanche, F. 1986. L’Écriture, le sacré et l’histoire: Érudits et politiques protestants devant la Bible en France au XVIIe siècle. Amsterdam et Maarsen: APA–Holland University Press.Google Scholar
LeBuffe, Michael. 2010. From Bondage to Freedom: Spinoza on Human Excellence. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
LeBuffe, Michael. 2017. Spinoza on Reason. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lecrivain, André. 1986. “Spinoza and Cartesian Mechanics.” In Spinoza and the Sciences, eds. Grene, Marjorie and Nails, Debra: 1560. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. 1854. Réfutation inedite de Spinoza, ed. Foucher de Careil, L. A.. Paris: E. Brière.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. 1875–90. Die philosophischen Schriften von G. W. Leibniz, ed. Gerhardt, C. I.. Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. 1923–(ongoing publication). Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe, Akademie-Ausgabe. Darmstadt and other places: Reichl and other publishers [cited as AA].Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. 1976. Philosophical Papers and Letters, ed. and trans. Loemker, L. E.. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. 1989. Leibniz: Philosophical Essays, eds. and trans. Ariew, Roger and Garber, Daniel. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. 1992. De Summa Rerum: Metaphysical Papers, 1675–1676, trans. Parkinson, G. H. R.. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, Joseph. 1999. The Autonomy of History: Truth and Method from Erasmus to Gibbon. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levy, Lia. 2000. L’automate spirituel: La naissance de la subjectivité moderne d’après l’Éthique de Spinoza. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Lévy, L. 2017. “‘Causa Conscientiae’ in Spinoza’s Ethics.” In Spinoza’s Ethics: A Critical Guide, ed. Melamed, Yitzhak Y.: 187204. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, T. 1987. Figures de l’infini: Les mathématiques au miroir des cultures. Paris: Éditions du seuil.Google Scholar
Lin, Martin. 2006. “Teleology and Human Action in Spinoza,” Philosophical Review 115: 317–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, Martin. 2018. “The Principle of Sufficient Reason in Spinoza.” In The Oxford Handbook of Spinoza, ed. Della Rocca, Michael: 133–54. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lin, Martin. 2019. Being and Reason: An Essay on Spinoza’s Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lordon, F. 2006. L’Intérêt souverain: Essai d’anthropologie économique spinoziste. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
Lucas, H.-C. 1982/83. “Hegel et l’édition de Spinoza par Paulus,” Cahiers Spinoza 4: 171204.Google Scholar
[Lucas, Jean Maximilien]. 1927. The Oldest Biography of Spinoza, ed. and trans. Wolf, A.. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Luther, Martin. 1960. “Lectures on Deuteronomy.” In Luther’s Works, eds. Pelikan, Jaroslav et al. St. Louis: Concordia.Google Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolo. 1994. Selected Political Writings, ed. & tr. by David Wootton, Hackett, 1994.Google Scholar
Malcolm, Noel. 2002. Aspects of Hobbes. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2003. “Leibniz, Oldenburg, and Spinoza, in the Light of Leibniz’s Letter to Oldenburg of 18/28 November 1676,” Studia Leibnitiana 35, 225–43.Google Scholar
Macherey, P. 1992. “Le Spinoza idéaliste de Hegel.” In Avec Spinoza: 187–97 Paris: Presses universitaires de France.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macherey, P. 2011. Hegel or Spinoza, trans. Ruddick, Susan M.. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolo. 1975. The Discourses of Niccolo Machiavelli, ed. Crich, Bernard and trans. Walker, Leslie. London: Routledge and Paul.Google Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolo. 1979. The Portable Machiavelli, ed. and trans. Bondanella, Peter and Musa, Mark. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolo. 1992. The Prince, second edition, ed. and trans. Adams, Robert. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Malcolm, Noel. 2003. “Leibniz, Oldenburg, and Spinoza, in the Light of Leibniz’s Letter to Oldenburg of 18/28 November 1676,” Studia Leibnitiana 35: 225–43.Google Scholar
Malebranche, Nicolas. 1979–92. Oeuvres, 2 vols., ed. Rodis-Lewis, G.. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Manning, Richard. 2012. “Spinoza’s Physical Theory.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (spring edition), ed. Zalta, Edwin. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/spinoza-physics.Google Scholar
Mark, Thomas. 1972. Spinoza’s Theory of Truth. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Colin. 2009. “The Mind and the Body as ‘One and the Same Thing’ in Spinoza,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 27.5: 897919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Eugene. 2008. “Adequacy and Innateness in Spinoza,” Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 4: 5188.Google Scholar
Marshall, Eugene. 2013. The Spiritual Automaton: Spinoza’s Science of the Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Martineau, James. 1882. A Study of Spinoza. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Marx, K. 1977. “Le Traité Théologico-politique et la Correspondance de Spinoza: trois cahiers d’étude de l’année 1841,” Cahiers Spinoza 1: 29158.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl, and Engels, Friedrich. 1978. The Marx-Engels Reader, second edition, ed. Tucker, R. C.. New York and London: Norton.Google Scholar
Mason, Richard. 1987. The God of Spinoza. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Massing, Michael. 2018. Fatal Discord, Erasmus, Luther, and the Fight for the Western Mind. New York: Harper-Collins.Google Scholar
Matheron, Alexandre. 1969. Individu et communauté chez Spinoza. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Matheron, Alexandre. 1977. “Le Traité Théologico-Politique vu par le jeune Marx,” Cahiers Spinoza 1: 159212.Google Scholar
Matheron, Alexandre. 1985. “Le ‘droit du plus fort’: Hobbes contre Spinoza,” Revue philosophique 110: 149–76.Google Scholar
Matheron, Alexandre. 1990. “Le problème de l’évolution de Spinoza du Traité théologico-politique au Traité politique.” In Spinoza: Issues and Directions, eds. Curley, Edwin and Moreau, Pierre-François: 258–70. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Matheron, Alexandre. 2011. Études sur Spinoza et les philosophies de l’âge classique. Lyon: ENS Éditions.Google Scholar
Matson, Wallace. 1977. “Death and Destruction in Spinoza’s Ethics,” Inquiry 20: 403–17.Google Scholar
Maull, Nancy. 1986. “Spinoza in the Century of Science.” In Spinoza and the Sciences, eds. Grene, Marjorie and Nails, Debra: 313. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenna, Antony. 1990. “Spinoza et les ‘athées vertueux’ dans un manuscrit clandestin au XVIIIe siècle.” In Spinoza au XVIIIe siècle, ed. Bloch, Olivier: 8592. Paris: Méridiens Klincksieck.Google Scholar
McKeon, Richard. 1928. The Philosophy of Spinoza: The Unity of His Thought. London: Longmans, Green, and Co.Google Scholar
McNiven Hine, E. 1979. A Critical Study of Condillac’s Traité des Systèmes. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McShea, Robert. 1968. The Political Philosophy of Spinoza. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meeks, Wayne, and Attridge, Harold, eds. 2006. The Harper-Collins Study Bible, revised edition. San Francisco: HarperOne [HCSB].Google Scholar
Meier, John. 1991. A Marginal Jew: Rethinking the Historical Jesus, 2 volumes. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Meijer, Willem. 1902. “De woning van Despinoza op de Stille Veerkade,” Die Haghe: Bijdragen en Mededeelingen: 207–17.Google Scholar
Meijer, Willem. 1909. “Reinsburch,” Leidsch jaarboekje 6: 156–88.Google Scholar
Meinel, Christoph. 1988. “Early Seventeenth-Century Atomism: Theory, Epistemology and the Insufficiency of Experiment,” Isis 79: 68103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meinsma, Koenraad Oege. 1896. Spinoza en zijn kring: Historisch-kritische studiën over Hollandsche vrijgeesten. The Hague: Nijhoff (reprinted 1980, intro. Zilverberg, S. B. J.. Utrecht: Hes).Google Scholar
Meinsma, Koenraad Oege. 1983. Spinoza et son cercle: Étude critique historique sur les hétérodoxes hollandaise, annot. and trans. Roosenburg, and Osier, J.-P.. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Melamed, Yitzhak Y. 2004. “Salomon Maimon and the Rise of Spinozism in German Idealism,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 42: 6796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melamed, Yitzhak Y. 2010a. “Acosmism or Weak Individuals? Hegel, Spinoza, and the Reality of the Finite,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (2010): 7792.Google Scholar
Melamed, Yitzhak Y. 2010b. “Spinoza’s Anti-Humanism: An Outline.” In The Rationalists, eds. Fraenkel, Carlos, Perinetti, Dario, and Smith, Justin. Kluwer-New Synthese Historical Library. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Melamed, Yitzhak Y. 2012a. “‘Christus secundum spiritum’: Spinoza, Jesus, and the Infinite Intellect.” In The Jewish Jesus, ed. Stahl, Neta: chapter 9. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Melamed, Yitzhak Y. 2012b. “Spinoza’s Deification of Existence,” Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 6: 75104.Google Scholar
Melamed, Yitzhak Y. 2012c. “Omnis determinatio est negatio’ – Determination, Negation and Self-Negation in Spinoza, Kant, and Hegel.” In Spinoza and German Idealism, eds. Förster, Eckart and Melamed, Yitzhak: 175–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Melamed, Yitzhak Y. 2012d. “Why Spinoza Is Not an Eleatic Monist (Or Why Diversity Exists).” In Spinoza on Monism, ed. Goff, Philip: 206–22. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Melamed, Yitzhak Y. 2012e. “Christus secundum spiritum: Spinoza, Jesus, and the Infinite Intellect.” In The Jewish Jesus, ed. Stahl, Neta: 140–51. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Melamed, Yitzhak Y. 2013a. Spinoza’s Metaphysics: Substance and Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melamed, Yitzhak Y. 2013b. “Reply to Colin Marshall” (Symposium on Yitzhak Y. Melamed, Spinoza’s Metaphysics), Leibniz Review 23: 207–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melamed, Yitzhak Y. 2013c. “Charitable Interpretations and the Political Domestication of Spinoza, or, Benedict in the Land of the Secular Imagination.” In Philosophy and Its History, eds. Lærke, M., Schliesser, E., and Smith, J. E. H.: 258–77. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Melamed, Yitzhak Y. 2014. “Hasdai Crescas and Spinoza on Actual Infinity and the Infinity of God’s Attributes.” In Spinoza and Jewish Philosophy, ed. Nadler, Steven: 204215. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melamed, Yitzhak Y. 2015. “A Glimpse into Spinoza’s Metaphysical Laboratory: The Development of Spinoza’s Concepts of Substance and Attribute.” In The Young Spinoza, ed. Melamed, Yitzhak Y.: 272–86. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melamed, Yitzhak Y. 2016. “Eternity in Early Modern Philosophy.” In Eternity: A History, ed. Melamed, Yitzhak Y.: 129–67. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melamed, Yitzhak Y. 2017. “The Building Blocks of Spinoza’s Metaphysics: Substance, Attributes, and Modes.” In The Oxford Handbook of Spinoza, ed. Della, Michael: 84113. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Melamed, Yitzhak Y. 2019. “The First Draft of Spinoza’s Ethics?” In Spinoza in Twenty-First Century French and American Philosophy, eds. Ramond, Charles and Stetter, Hack: 93112. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Melamed, Yitzhak Y. (forthcoming). “Spinoza’s Critique of Gersonides’ view on Divine Omniscience.” In Gersonides Through the Ages, eds. Freudenthal, Gad, Wirmer, David, and Eliot, Ofer.Google Scholar
Melamed, Yitzhak Y., and Lin, Martin. 2016. “Principle of Sufficient Reason.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Zalta, Edward N.. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2016/entries/sufficient-reason/.Google Scholar
Mendelssohn, M. 1971–. Gesammelte Schriften. Stuttgart and Bad Cannstatt: Fromman Holzboog.Google Scholar
Menasseh ben Israel, . 1842. The Conciliator of R. Manasseh Ben Israel V2: A Reconcilement of the Apparent Contradictions in Holy Scripture, trans. E. H. Lindo. London: Duncan and Malcolm (reprinted in New York: Hermon Press, 1972).Google Scholar
Lærke, M.. Spinoza and the Freedom of Philosophizing. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mertens, Frank. 2008. “Spinoza’s Amsterdamse vriendenkring: Studievriendschappen, zakenrelaties en familiebanden.” In Libertas philosophandi: Spinoza als gids voor een vrije wereld, ed. van Heertum, Cis: 6981. Amsterdam: In de Pelikaan.Google Scholar
Mertens, Frank. 2011. “Johannes Koerbagh’s Lost Album Amicorum Seen through the Eyes of Pieter de la Ruë,” Lias 38: 59127.Google Scholar
Mertens, Frank. 2017. “Van den Enden and Religion.” In The Dutch Legacy: Radical Thinkers of the 17th Century and the Enlightenment, eds. Lavaert, Sonja and Schröder, Winfried: 6289. Leiden/Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Metlov, V. J. 2008. “Spinoza dans la philosophie Russe.” In Spinoza au XIXe siècle, eds. Tosel, A., Moreau, P.-F., and Salem, J.: 377–86. Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne.Google Scholar
Metzger, Bruce, and Ehrman, Bart. 2005. The Text of the New Testament, Its Transmission, Corruption and Restoration, fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, Arnold. 1896. Jesu Mutter-sprache: Das Galiläische Aramäisch in seiner Bedeutung für die Erklärung der Reden Jesu und der Evangelien überhaupt. Freiburg/Leipzig.Google Scholar
Meyer, H., ed. 1926. Verzeichniss der auserlesenen Büchersammlung des seeligen Herrn Moses Mendelssohn. Berlin: Soncino-Ges.Google Scholar
Miert, D. van. 2018. The Emancipation of Biblical Philology in the Dutch Republic, 1590–1670. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miert, D. van, Nellen, H., Steenbakkers, P., and Touber, J., eds. 2017. Scriptural Authority & Biblical Criticism in the Dutch Golden Age. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mignini, Filippo. 1979. “Per la datazione e l’interpretazione del Tractatus de intellectus emendatione di B. Spinoza,” La Cultura 17: 87160.Google Scholar
Mignini, Filippo. 1981. “Il sigillo di Spinoza,” La Cultura 19: 351–38.Google Scholar
Mignini, Filippo. 1987. “Données et problèmes de la chronologie spinozienne entre 1656 et 1665,” Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques 71: 921.Google Scholar
Mignini, Filippo. 1990. “In Order to Interpret Spinoza’s Theory of the Third Kind of Knowledge: Should Intuitive Science Be Considered per causam proximam Knowledge?” In Spinoza: Issues and Directions, eds. Curley, Edwin and Moreau, Pierre-François: 136–46. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Miller, David, ed. 1987. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Political Thought. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jon, Miller. 2003. “Spinoza and the Concept of a Law of Nature,” The History of Philosophy Quarterly 20: 257–76.Google Scholar
Jon, Miller. 2005. “Spinoza’s Axiology.” In Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy, vol. 2, eds. Garber, Daniel and Nadler, Steven. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Montag, Warren. 1999. Bodies, Masses, Power: Spinoza and His Contemporaries. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Montag, Warren, and Stolze, Tad, eds. 1997. The New Spinoza. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Moreau, Pierre-François. 1978. “Spinoza et Victor Cousin,” Archivio di filosofia 1: 327–31.Google Scholar
Moreau, Pierre-François. 1980. “Saisset, lecteur de Spinoza,” Recherches sur le xviie siècle 4: 8597.Google Scholar
Moreau, Pierre-François. 1988. “Les enjeux de la publication en France des papiers de Leibniz sur Spinoza,” Revue de métaphysique et de morale 2: 215–22.Google Scholar
Moreau, Pierre-François. 1994. Spinoza: L’expérience et l’éternité. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Moreau, Pierre-François. 2007. “Spinoza est-il spinoziste?” In Qu’est-ce que les Lumières “radicales”? eds. Secrétan, C., Dagron, T., and Bove, L.: 289–97. Paris: Éditions Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Moreau, Pierre-François. 2008. “Traduire Spinoza: l’exemple d’Émile Saisset.” In Spinoza au XIXe siècle, eds. Tosel, A., Moreau, P.-F., and Salem, J.: 221–30. Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne.Google Scholar
Moreau, Pierre-François. 2014. “In naturalismo: Leibniz, Spinoza, et les spiritualistes français.” In Spinoza/Leibniz. Rencontres, controverses, receptions, eds. Andrault, R., Lærke, M., and Moreau, P.-F.: 325–44. Paris: Presses universitaires de Paris-Sorbonne.Google Scholar
Moreau, Pierre-François. 2018. “Le Bord du précipice. Dortous de Mairan entre Malebranche et Spinoza.” In Malebranche et Spinoza, eds. Carbone, R., Jaquet, Ch., and Moreau, P.-F.. Lyon: ENS Editions.Google Scholar
Moretti-Constanzi, T. 1946. Spinoza. Rome: Editrice Universitas.Google Scholar
Mori, Gianluca 1998. “Baruch de Spinoza: Athée vertueux, athée de système.” In Critique, savoir et érudition à la veille de Lumières: Le Dictionaire historique et critique de Pierre Bayle (1647–1706), ed. Bots, Hans: 341–58. Amsterdam: APA.Google Scholar
Mori, Gianluca 2014. “Pierre Bayle.” In The Bloomsbury Companion to Spinoza, eds. van Bunge, Wiep, Krop, Henri, Steenbakkers, Piet, and van de Ven, Jeroen: 85106. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Morrison, John 2013. “The Relation between Conception and Causation in Spinoza’s Metaphysics,” Philosopher’s Imprint 13.3: 117.Google Scholar
Morrison, John 2020. “Two Puzzles about Thought and Identity in Spinoza.” In Spinoza’s Ethics: A Critical Guide, ed. Melamed, Yitzhak Y.: 5681. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mulier, Eco Haitsma. 1980. The Myth of Venice and Dutch Republican Thought in the Seventeenth Century. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Murray, J. Clark. 1896. “The Idealism of Spinoza,” Philosophical Review 5.5: 473–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadler, Steven. 2001. Spinoza’s Heresy: Immortality and the Jewish Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadler, Steven. 2006. Spinoza’s Ethics: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadler, Steven. 2010. “‘Whatever Is, Is in God’: Substance and Things in Spinoza’s Metaphysics.” In Interpreting Spinoza. Critical Essays, ed. Huenemann, Charlie: 5370. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nadler, Steven. 2011. A Book Forged in Hell: Spinoza’s Scandalous Treatise and the Birth of a Secular Age. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadler, Steven. 2018. Spinoza: A Life, second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nahon, Gérard. 1979–80. “Amsterdam, métropole occidentale des Sefarades au XVIIe siècle,” Cahiers Spinoza 3: 1550.Google Scholar
Nails, Debra. 1986. “Annotated Bibliography of Spinoza and the Sciences.” In Spinoza and the Sciences, eds. Grene, Marjorie and Nails, Debra: 305–14. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Negri, Antonio. 1991. The Savage Anomaly, trans. Hardt, Michael. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Negri, Antonio, and Hardt, M.. 2000. Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Neu, Jerome. 1977. Emotion, Thought and Therapy. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Newlands, Samuel. 2010. “Another Kind of Spinozistic Monism,” Noûs 44: 469502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newlands, Samuel. 2011a. “Hegel’s Idealist Reading of Spinoza,” Philosophy Compass 6.2: 100108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newlands, Samuel. 2011b. “More Recent Idealist Readings of Spinoza,” Philosophy Compass 6.2: 109–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newlands, Samuel. 2017. “Spinoza on Universals.” In The Problem of Universals in Modern Philosophy, eds. Di Bella, Stefano and Schmaltz, Tad; 6286. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nicholas of Cusa, . 1991. The Catholic Concordance, ed. Sigmund, Paul. Cambridge: Cambridge University of Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noordegraaf, Leo, and Valk, Gerrit. 1996. De Gave Gods: De pest in Holland vanaf de late middeleeuwen. Amsterdam: Bert Bakker.Google Scholar
Normore, Calvin G. 2010. “Accidents and Modes.” In The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy, vol. 2, ed. Pasnau, Robert: 674–85. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Norris, Christopher. 1991. Spinoza & the Origins of Modern Critical Theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Offenberg, Adri. 1973. “Spinoza’s Library: The Story of a Reconstruction,” Quaerendo 3: 309–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oldenburg, Henry. 1965–86. The Correspondence of Henry Oldenburg, 13 vols., eds. and trans. Hall, A. Rupert and Hall, Marie Boas. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press; London: Mansell, Taylor, and Francis.Google Scholar
Owen, G. E. L. 1965. “Inherence,” Phronesis 10: 97105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parfit, Derek. 1984. Reasons and Persons. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parkinson, G. H. R. 1954. Spinoza’s Theory of Knowledge. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Parkinson, G. H. R. 1993. “Spinoza and British Idealism: The Case of H. H. Joachim,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 1: 109–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Partington, J. R. 1951. General and Inorganic Chemistry for University Students, second edition. London: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Pascal, Blaise. 1663. Traité de l’équilibre des liueurs et de la pesanteur de la masse de l’air. Paris: Desprez.Google Scholar
Pätzold, D. 2011. “Moses Mendelssohn on Spinoza.” In Moses Mendelssohn’s Metaphysics and Aesthetics, ed. Munk, R.: 107–30. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Peden, Knox. 2014. Spinoza contra Phenomenology: French Rationalism from Cavaillès to Deleuze. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Perler, Dominik. 2007. “Spinozas Antiskeptizismus,” Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 61: 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perler, Dominik. 2008. “Begriffliche und psychologische Ordnung bei Spinoza,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 90: 188215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perler, Dominik. 2014. “Spinoza über Tiere,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 96: 232–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterman, Alison. 2012. “Spinoza on the ‘Principles of Natural Things,’Leibniz Review 22: 3766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterman, Alison. 2014. “Spinoza on Physical Science,” Philosophy Compass 9: 214–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterman, Alison. 2015. “Spinoza on Extension and Space,” Philosopher’s Imprint 15.14: 123.Google Scholar
Pethick, S. 2015. Affectivity and Philosophy after Spinoza and Nietzsche. London: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petry, M. J. 1994. “Algebra, Chances and the Rainbow.” In Les textes de Spinoza: Etudes sur les mots, les phrases, les livres, eds. Akkerman, Fokke and Steenbakkers, Piet. Philosophia Spinozae Perennis: Spinoza’s Philosophy and its Relevance, vol. 9. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Pierre-François, Moreau. “Le Bord du précipice. Dortous de Mairan entre Malebranche et Spinoza.” In Malebranche et Spinoza, ed. Carbone, R.. Lyon: ENS Editions, 2018. Open Edition : https://books.openedition.org/enseditions/8618?lang=frGoogle Scholar
Plekhanov, G. 1979. “Bernstein and Materialism (July 1898).” In Selected Philosophical Works, vol. III: 325–39. London: Lawrence and Wishart; and Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House.Google Scholar
Pollock, Fredrick. 1966. Spinoza: His Life and Philosophy, second edition. New York: American Scholar Publications (first edition 1880).Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard. 1986. “Some New Light on the Roots of Spinoza’s Science of Bible Study.” In Spinoza and the Sciences, eds. Grene, Marjorie and Nails, Debra: 171–88. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard. 1996. “Spinoza and Bible Scholarship.” In The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza, first edition, ed. Garrett, Don: 383407. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard. 2003. The History of Scepticism: From Savonarola to Bayle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Prud’homme van Reine, Ronald. 2013. Moordenaars van Jan de Witt: De zwartste bladzijde van de Gouden Eeuw. Utrecht: Arbeiderspers.Google Scholar
Racine, Jean. 1670. Théâtre complet. Paris: Gamier.Google Scholar
Ramsay, A. M. 1735. “Le psychomètre ou réflexions sur les différens caracteres de l’esprit, par un mylord anglois,” Mémoires de Trévoux: 694–720.Google Scholar
Ramsay, A. M. 1748. “Appendix to the Foregoing Work Containing a Refutation of the First Book of Spinoza’s Ethics by Which the Whole Structure Is Undermined.” In The Philosophical Principles of Natural and Revealed Religion, Unfolded in a Geometrical Order: 425541 Glasgow: Robert Foulis.Google Scholar
Rappaport, S. 1899. “Schopenhauer und Spinoza: Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung der Doctorwürde den hohen philosophischen Facultät Halle-Wittenberg.” Doctoral thesis, Halle/Wittemberg.Google Scholar
Razvan, I. 2019. The Body in Spinoza and Nietzsche. London: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Regius, J. 1723. Cartesius verus spinozismus architectus. Amstelodami: B. Lakeman.Google Scholar
Renz, Ursula. 2010. Die Erklärbarkeit von Erfahrung: Realismus und Subjektivität in Spinozas Theorie des menschlichen Geistes. Frankfurt a. M.: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar
Renz, Ursula. 2011. “The Definition of the Human Mind and the Numerical Differences between Subjects (2p11–2p13s).” In Spinoza’s Ethics: A Collective Commentary, eds. Hampe, Michael, Renz, Ursula, and Schnepf, Robert: 99118. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Renz, Ursula. 2012. “Changing one’s Own Feelings: Spinoza and Shaftesbury on Philosophy as Therapy.” In Emotional Minds: The Passions and the Limits of Pure Inquiry in Early Modern Philosophy, ed. Ebbersmeyer, Sabrina: 121–35. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Renz, Ursula. 2014. “Doxastische Selbstkontrolle und Wahrheitssensitivität: Descartes und Spinoza über die Voraussetzungen einer rationalistischen Ethik der Überzeugungen,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 96: 463–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renz, Ursula. 2015. “Der neue Spinozismus und das Verhältnis von deskriptiver und revisionärer Metaphysik,” Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 63.3: 476–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renz, Ursula. 2018a. The Explainability of Experience: Realism and Subjectivity in Spinoza’s Theory of the Human Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renz, Ursula. 2018b. “Finite Subjects in the Ethics: Spinoza on Indexical Knowledge, the First Person and the Individuality of Human Minds.” In The Oxford Handbook to Spinoza, ed. Della Rocca, Michael: 204–19. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Renz, Ursula. 2019. “Spinozist Cognitive Psychology: Spinoza’s Concept of the Imagination.” In Konzepte der Einbildungskraft in der Philosophie, den Wissenschaften und den Künsten des 18. Jahrhunderts. Udo Thiel zum 65. Geburtstag, eds Meer, Rudolf, Motta, Giuseppe, and Stiening, Gideon: 1125. Berlin/Boston: Walter De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Révah, I. S. 1959. Spinoza et le Dr Juan de Prado. Paris/La Haye: Mouton.Google Scholar
Révah, I. S. 1995. Des marranes à Spinoza, eds. Méchoulan, Henry, Moreau, Pierre-François, and Lorenz Wilke, Carsten. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Abraham. 2008. “Op welke school leerde Spinoza?” In Libertas philosophandi: Spinoza als gids voor een vrije wereld, ed. van Heertum, Cis: 5567. Amsterdam: In de Pelikaan.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Michael. 2001. “Spinoza’s Dogmas of the Universal Faith and the Problem of Religion,” Philosophy & Theology 13.1: 5372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, Michael. 2010. “Miracles, Wonder and the State.” In Spinoza’s Theological-Political Treatise: A Critical Guide, eds. Melamed, Yitzhak and Rosenthal, Michael. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Michael. 2012. “Why Spinoza Is Intolerant of Atheists,” Review of Metaphysics 65.4: 813–39.Google Scholar
Roth, Leon. 1924. Spinoza, Descartes, Maimonides. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Roth, Leon. 1929. Spinoza. London: E. Benn.Google Scholar
Rotter, H. M. 2019. Selbsterhaltung und Wille zur Macht: Nietzsches Spinoza-Rezeption. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rovere, M. 2017. Le Clan Spinoza. Amsterdam 1677: L’invention de la liberté. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Rozemond, Marleen. 1998. Descartes’s Dualism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubel, M. 1977. “Marx à la rencontre de Spinoza,” Cahiers Spinoza 1: 728.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 2004. History of Western Philosophy and Its Connection with Political and Social Circumstances from the Earliest Times to the Present Day. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ryan, Alan. 1983. “Hobbes, Toleration and the Inner Life.” In The Nature of Political Theory, eds. Miller, David and Seidentop, Larry. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Saar, Martin. 2013. Die Immanenz der Macht: Politische Theorie nach Spinoza. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Sabine, George. 1973. A History of Political Theory, fourth edition, rev. Thorson, T. L.. Hinsdale: Dryden Press.Google Scholar
Sahakian, William S., ed. 1970. History of Psychology: A Source Book in Systematic Psychology. Itasca: F. E. Peacock Publishers.Google Scholar
Saisset, É. 1859. Essai de philosophie religieuse. Paris: Charpentier.Google Scholar
Salem, J. 2008. “Georges Plekhanov, lecteur de Spinoza.” In Spinoza au XIXe siècle, eds. Tosel, A., Moreau, P.-F., and Salem, J.: 149–60. Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne.Google Scholar
Salomon, H. P. 1984. “La Vraie Excommunication de Spinoza.” In Forum Litterarum: Miscelânea de estudos literários, linguísticos e históricos oferecida a J. J. van den Besselaar, eds. Bots, Hans and Kerkhof, Maximiliaan: 181–99. Amsterdam/ Maarssen: APA-Holland Univerity Press.Google Scholar
Sanders, E. P. 1993. The Historical Figure of Jesus. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Saraiva, António José. 2011. The Marrano Factory: The Portuguese Inquisition and Its New Christians, 1536–1765, trans. and rev. Salomon, H. P. and Sassoon, I. S. D.. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Savan, David. 1986. “Spinoza: Scientist and Theorist of Scientific Method.” In Spinoza and the Sciences, eds. Grene, Marjorie and Nails, Debra: 95123. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scandella, M. 2012. “Did Nietzsche Read Spinoza? Some Preliminary Notes on the Nietzsche-Spinoza Problem, Kuno Fischer, and Other Sources,” Nietzsche Studies 41: 308–32.Google Scholar
Schaffer, Jonathan. 2016. “Monism.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Zalta, Edward N.. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/monism/.Google Scholar
Schechter, Oded. 2014. “Existence and Temporality in Spinoza.” PhD dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Schelling, F. W. J. 1966. Zur Geschichte der neueren Philosophie: Münchener Vorlesungen. Leipzig: Philipp Reclam jun.Google Scholar
Schliesser, Eric. 2014. “Spinoza and the Philosophy of Science: Mathematics, Motion, and Being.” In The Oxford Handbook of Spinoza, ed. Rocca, Della: 155–89. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schmaltz, Tad M. 2011. “God as Causa Sui and Created Truth in Descartes.” In The Ultimate Why Question: Why Is There Anything at All Rather than Nothing Whatsoever?, ed. Wippel, J.. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Schmid, Stephan 1996. Metaphysik im ersten Teil der Ethik Spinozas. Würzburg: Königshausen und Neumann.Google Scholar
Schmid, Stephan 2006. “Wer oder was ist unsterblich (wenn überhaupt)? Spinozas Theorie des ewigen Teils des endlichen Geistes,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 88: 189215.Google Scholar
Schmid, Stephan 2008. “Wahrheit und Adäquatheit bei Spinoza,” Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 62: 209–32.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Biggemann, W. 1992. “Spinoza dans le Cartésianisme.” In L’Écriture sainte au temps de Spinoza et dans le système Spinoziste. Groupe de Recherches Spinozistes, Travaux et Documents 4: 7190. Paris: Presses de l’Université de Paris Sorbonne.Google Scholar
Schnepf, Robert. 2008. “Von der Naturalisierung der Ontologie zur Naturalisierung der Ethik: Spinozas Metaethik im Kontext spätscholastischer Entia-moralia-Theorien,” Studia Spinozana 16: 105–27.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, A. 1909. The World as Will and Idea, 3 vols., trans. Haldane, R. B. and Kemp, J.. London: Kegan Paul / Trench, Trübner & Co.Google Scholar
Schroeder, H. J., trans. 1978. The Canons and Decrees of the Council of Trent, Fourth Session, O. P. Charlotte: TAN Books.Google Scholar
Schröder, W. 1987. Spinoza in der deutschen Frühaufklärung. Würzburg: Königshausen und Neumann.Google Scholar
Scribano, M. E. 1988. Da Descartes a Spinoza: Percosi délia teología razionale nel Seicento. Milan: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Secretan, Catherin. 1987. “La reception de Hobbes aux Pays-Bas aux XVIIIe siècle,” Studia Spinozana 3: 2746.Google Scholar
Secrétan, C., Dagron, T., and Bove, L., eds. 2007. Qu’est-ce que les Lumières “radicales”? Paris: Éditions Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Seligman, Edwin R. A., and Johnson, Alvin. 1930–35. Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, 15 vols. New York: MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seguin, M. S., and Moreau, P.-F., eds. 2016. La Lettre Clandestine 25. Thematic issue: “Le Traité des trois imposteurs.”Google Scholar
Semerari, G. 1952. Problemi dello Spinozismo. Vecchi: Trani.Google Scholar
Sextus Empiricus, . 2000. Outlines of Scepticism, second edition, eds. Annas, Julia and Barnes, Jonathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shein, Noa. 2009. “The False Dichotomy between Objective and Subjective Interpretations of Spinoza’s Attributes,” British Journal of the History of Philosophy 17.3: 529–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherwood, William of. 1966. William of Sherwood’s Introduction to Logic, ed. and trans. Kretzmann, Norman. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Siebrand, Heine. 1986. “Spinoza and the Rise of Modern Science in the Netherlands.” In Spinoza and the Sciences, eds. Grene, Marjorie and Nails, Debra: 6191. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sills, David L., ed. 1968–79. International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, 18 vols. New York: MacMillan, Free Press.Google Scholar
Silverman, Alex. 2017. “The Nature and Scope of Spinoza’s ‘One and the Same,’Res Philosophica 94.4: 535–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, Richard. 1689. Histoire critique du texte du Nouveau Testament. Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 1974. “Conquest and Consent: Thomas Hobbes and the Engagement Controversy.” In The Interregnum: The Quest for Settlement, ed. Alymer, G. E.: 7998. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Fred, Skolnik, and Michael, Berenbaum, eds. 2007. Encyclopedia Judaica, Macmillian Reference, second edition. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Smith, A. D. 2014. “Spinoza, Gueroult and Substance,” Philosophy & Phenomenological Research 87: 655–88.Google Scholar
Smith, Steven B. 1997. Spinoza, Liberalism and the Question of Jewish Identity. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sommer, A. U. 2012. “Nietzsche’s Readings on Spinoza: A Contextualist Study, Particularly on the Reception of Kuno Fischer,” Journal of Nietzsche Studies 43.2: 156–84.Google Scholar
Soyarslan, Sanem. 2014. “From Ordinary Life to Blessedness: The Power of Intuitive Knowledge in Spinoza’s Ethics.” In Essays on Spinoza’s Ethical Theory, eds. Kisner, Matthew J. and Youpa, Andrew: 236–57. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Soyarslan, Sanem. 2016. “The Distinction between Reason and Intuitive Knowledge in Spinoza’s Ethics,” European Journal of Philosophy 24.1: 2754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Springmeyer, Heinrich. 1970. “Eine neue kritische Textausgabe der ‘Regulae ad directionem ingenii’ von René Descartes,” Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 24: 101–25.Google Scholar
Steenbakkers, Piet. 1994. Spinoza’s Ethica from Manuscript to Print: Studies on Text, Form, and Related Topics. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Steenbakkers, Piet. 2003, “Jean-Maximilien Lucas.” In The Dictionary of Seventeenth and Eighteenth-Century Dutch Philosophers, eds. van Bunge, Wiep et al.: 644–46. Bristol: Thoemmes.Google Scholar
Steenbakkers, Piet. 2009. “The Textual History of Spinoza’s Ethics.” In The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza’s Ethics, ed. Koistinen, Olli: 2641. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steenbakkers, Piet. 2010. “The Text of Spinoza’s Tractatus Theologico-Politicus.” In Spinoza’s Theological-Political Treatise: A Critical Guide, eds. Melamed, Yitzhak and Rosenthal, Michael: 2940. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steenbakkers, Piet. 2012. “Spinoza and Evolutionary Theory: The Case of T. H. Huxley,” Rivista di Filosofia 32 (Terza Serie VII/2): 229–46.Google Scholar
Steenbakkers, Piet, Touber, Jetze, and van de Ven, Jeroen, 2011. “A Clandestine Notebook (1678–79) on Spinoza, Beverland, Politics, the Bible and Sex,” Lias: Journal of Early Modern Intellectual Culture and Its Sources 38.2: 225365.Google Scholar
Steig, G. 1999. “Goethe et Spinoza,” Revue germanique international 12: 6375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, Diane. 1984. “Spinoza’s Ethical Doctrine and the Unity of Human Nature,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 22: 303–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, Justin. 2018. Spinoza’s Political Psychology: The Taming of Fortune and Fear. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stendahl, Krister. 1976. Paul among Jews and Gentiles. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
Steno, Nicolas. 1675. Ad novæ philosophiæ, reformatorem de vera philosophia epistola. Florence: ex typographia N. Nauesii.Google Scholar
Stoppa, G. B. 1680. The Religion of the Dutch Represented in Several Letters from a Protestant Officer in the French Army to a Pastor and Professor of Divinity at Berne in Swisserland; out of the French. London: Samuel Heyrick.Google Scholar
Stouppe, Jean-Baptiste. 1673. La Religion des Hollandois, representée en plusieurs lettres écrites par un officier de l’armée du Roy, à un pasteur et professeur de theologie de Berne. Cologne: Marteau.Google Scholar
Strauss, Leo. 1952. Persecution and the Art of Writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Strauss, Leo. 1997. Spinoza’s Critique of Religion, trans. Sinclair, E. M.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. 1974. Freedom and Resentment and Other Essays. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Swetschinski, Daniel M. 2000. Reluctant Cosmopolitans: The Portuguese Jews of Seventeenth-Century Amsterdam. Oxford and Portland: Littman Library.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tacitus, . 1989. The Annals of Imperial Rome. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Thijssen-Schoute, C. Louise. 1954. Nederlands cartesianisme. Amsterdam: Noord-Hollandsche Uitgevers Maatschappij.Google Scholar
Thomasius, J. 1693. Adversus anonymum, de libertate philosophandi, in Dissertationes LXIII, ed. Thomasius, Chr.: 571–84. Halæ Magdeburgicæ: Impenis Johannis Friderici Zeitleri.Google Scholar
Thomson, Ann. 1996. “Introduction.” In de La Mettrie, J. O., Machine Man and Other Writings, ed. and trans. Thomson, A.: xiixxx. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Toland, John. 1704. Letters to Serena. London: Bernard Lintot.Google Scholar
Totaro, P. 2000. “Documenti su Spinoza nell’Archivio del S. Uffizio dell’Inquisizione,” Nouvelles de la République des Lettres 1: 95128.Google Scholar
Touber, J. 2018. Spinoza and Biblical Philology in the Dutch Republic, 1660–1710. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tschirnhaus, E. W. von. 1687. Medicina mentus sive Tentamen genuinæ Logicæ. Amstelædami: Apud Albertum Magnum, & Joannem Rieuwerts Juniorem.Google Scholar
Tschirnhaus, E. W. von. 1980. Médecine de l’esprit ou préceptes généraux de l’art de découvrir, trans. Wurtz, J.-P.. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Twersky, Isadore, ed. and trans. 1972. A Maimonides Reader. West Orange: Behrman House.Google Scholar
Valla, Lorenzo. 2007. On the Donation of Constantine, trans and notes Bowersock, G. W.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Van Bunge, Wiep. 1989. “The Early Dutch Reception of the Tractatus Theologico-Politicus,” Studia Spinozana 5: 225–51.Google Scholar
Van Bunge, Wiep, Krop, Henri, Steenbakkers, Piet, and van de Ven, Jeroen M. M., eds. 2014. The Bloomsbury Companion to Spinoza. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Van de Ven, Jeroen. 2014. “Life: Spinoza’s Life and Time. An Annotated Chronology Based upon Historical Documents.” In The Bloomsbury Companion to Spinoza, eds. Van Bunge, Wiep, Krop, Henri, Steenbakkers, Piet, and van de Ven, Jeroen M. M.: 157. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Van de Ven, Jeroen. 2015. “‘Crastinâ die loquar cum Celsissimo principe de Spinosa’: New Perspectives on Spinoza’s Trip to the French Army Headquarters in Utrecht in Late July 1673,” Intellectual History Review 25: 147–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2021. Printing Spinoza: A Descriptive Bibliography of the Works Published in the Seventeenth Century. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Van der Leer, Kees. 2016. Spraakmakende personen in Voorburgse prentkunst: Uit de collectie van Gerard Duijvestein. Leidschendam-Voorburg: Museum Swaensteyn.Google Scholar
Van der Linde, A. 1871. Benedictus Spinoza bibliografie. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Van der Tak, W. G. 1932. “Colerus, biograaf van Spinoza,” De nieuwe gids 47: 476–80.Google Scholar
Van der Tang, Aad. 1984. “Spinoza en Schiedam,” Scyedam 10: 159–84.Google Scholar
Van, Rooijen, and Servaas, A. J.. 1888. Inventaire des livres formant la bibliothèque de Bénédict Spinoza. The Hague, Paris: W. C. Tengeler, Paul Monnerat.Google Scholar
Van Ruler, Han. 1999. “Geulincx and Spinoza: Books, Backgrounds and Biographies,” Studia Spinozana 15 [published 2006]: 98106.Google Scholar
Van Velthuysen, Lambert. 1680. Opera omnia, 2 vols. Rotterdam: Leers.Google Scholar
2013. A Letter on the Principles of Justness and Decency, ed. and trans. de Mowbray, Malcolm, introd. Secretan, Catherine. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Vater, M. 2012. “Schelling’s Philosophy of Identity and Spinoza’s Ethica more geometrico.” In Spinoza and German Idealism, eds. Förster, E. and Melamed, Y.: 159–74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vaz Dias, A. M. 1931. “Heeft Spinoza in’t Opregte Tappeyt Huis gewoond?,” De Vrijdagavond 8.6: 8789 [English translation in Vaz Dias and Van der Tak 1982: 172–75].Google Scholar
Vaz Dias, A. M. and van der Tak, W. G.. 1932. Spinoza Mercator et Autodidactus: Oorkonden en andere authentieke documenten betreffende des wijsgeers jeugd en diens betrekkingen. The Hague: Nijhoff. [English translation, without facsimiles, in Vaz Dias, A. M. and Van der Tak, W. G.. 1982. “Spinoza Merchant and Autodidact: Charters and Other Authentic Documents Relating to the Philosopher’s Youth and his Relations,” Studia Rosenthaliana 16: 109–171.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaz Dias, A. M. and van der Tak, W. G.. 1934. De firma Bento y Gabriel de Spinoza, Mededeelingen van wege Het Spinozahuis, vol. 1. Leiden: Brill. [English translation in Vaz Dias, A. M. and Van der Tak, W. G.. 1982. “Spinoza Merchant and Autodidact: Charters and Other Authentic Documents Relating to the Philosopher’s Youth and his Relations,” Studia Rosenthaliana 16: 178–89.]Google Scholar
Vaz Dias, A. M. and van der Tak, W. G.. 1982. “Spinoza Merchant and Autodidact: Charters and Other Authentic Documents Relating to the Philosopher’s Youth and His Relations,” Studia Rosenthaliana 16: 103–95.Google Scholar
Verbeek, Theo. 2003. Spinoza’s Theologico-Political Treatise: Exploring the Will of God. Aldershot: Ashgate Press.Google Scholar
Vermeren, P. 1990. “La philosophie au présent: Le juif Spinoza (l’institution philosophique et la doctrine maudite du juif Spinoza,” Lignes 10: 167–80.Google Scholar
Vernière, P. 1954. Spinoza et la pensée française avant la Révolution. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Vinciguerra, Lorenzo. 2005. Spinoza et le Signe: La genèse de l’imagination. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Vlessing, Odette. 1996. “The Jewish Community in Transition: From Acceptance to Emancipation,” Studia Rosenthaliana 30: 195211.Google Scholar
Vlessing, Odette. 1997. “The Excommunication of Baruch Spinoza: A Conflict between Jewish and Dutch Law,” Studia Spinozana 13 [published 2003]: 1547.Google Scholar
2002. “The excommunication of Baruch Spinoza: The Birth of a Philosopher.” In Dutch Jewry: Its History and Secular Culture (1500–2000), eds. Israel, Jonathan and Salverda, Reinier: 141–72. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voss, Stephen 1981. “How Spinoza Enumerated the Affects,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 63: 167–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vulliaud, Paul. 1934. Spinoza d’après les livres de sa bibliothèque. Paris: Bibliothèque Chacornac.Google Scholar
Wachter, J. G. 1699. Der Spinozismus im Jüdenthumb oder die von dem heutigen Jüdenthumb und dessen geheimen Kabbala Vergötterte Welt. Amsterdam: Johann Wolters.Google Scholar
Wachter, J. G. 1706. Elucidarius cabalisticus, sive reconditae Hebraeorum philosophiae brevis et succincta recensio. “Rome” [in fact: Halle]: s.n.Google Scholar
Walther, Manfred. 1971. Metaphysik als Anti-Theologie: Die Philosophie Spinozas im Zusammenhang der religionsphilosophischen Problematik. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Walther, Manfred. 2009. “Suppress or Refute? Reactions to Spinoza around 1700.” In The Use of Censorship in the Enlightenment, ed. Lærke, M.: 2540. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Walther, Manfred, ed. 1998. Spinoza: Lebensbeschreibungen und Dokumente. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Walther, Manfred, and Czelinski, Michael, eds. 2006. Die Lebensgeschichte Spinozas, 2 vols. (based on Freudenthal, Jacob. 1899. Die Lebensgeschichte Spinoza’s in Quellenschriften, Urkunden und nichtamtlichen Nachrichten. Leipzig: Von Veit). Stuttgart-Bad Canstatt: Frommann-Holzboog [cited as W/Cz].Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. 1973. “The Problem of Dirty Hands,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 2: 160–80.Google Scholar
Wielema, Michiel. 2003. “Adriaan Koerbagh.” In The Dictionary of Seventeenth and Eighteenth-Century Dutch Philosophers, eds. van Bunge, Wiep et al.: 571–74. Bristol: Thoemmes.Google Scholar
Wielema, Michiel. 2004. The March of the Libertines: Spinozists and the Dutch Reformed Church 1660–1750. Hilversum: Verloren.Google Scholar
Willis, Robert. 1870. Benedict de Spinoza: His Life, Correspondence, and Ethics. London: Trübner & Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wills, Garry. 2006. What Paul Meant. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Wilson, Margaret D. 1996. “Spinoza’s Theory of Knowledge.” In The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza, first edition, ed. Garrett, Don: 89141. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Margaret D. 1999. “Spinoza’s Causal Axiom.” In Ideas and Mechanism: Essays on Early Modern Philosophy: 141–65. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Margaret D. 2001. Ideas and Mechanism: Essays on Early Modern Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wirszubski, C. 1955. “Spinoza’s Debt to Tacitus,” Scripta Hierosolymitana 2: 176–86.Google Scholar
Wolf, A. 1935. A History of Science, Technology, and Philosophy in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries, with the cooperation of F. Danneman and A. Armitage. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar
Wolf, Susan. 1979. Asymmetrical Freedom,” Journal of Philosophy 77: 151–66.Google Scholar
Wolfson, Harry Austryn. 1934. The Philosophy of Spinoza, 2 vols. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wollenberg, David. 2013. “Nietzsche, Spinoza, and the Moral Affects,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 51.4: 617–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wurzer, W. S. 1975. Nietzsche und Spinoza. Meissenheim an Glan: Anton Hein.Google Scholar
Yakira, Elkhanan. 1988. “Boyle et Spinoza,” Archives de Philosophie 51: 107–24.Google Scholar
Youpa, Andrew. 2020. The Ethics of Joy: Spinoza on the Empowered Life. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yovel, Yirmiyahu. 1989. Spinoza and Other Heretics: The Marrano of Reason. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Yovel, Yirmiyahu. 2018. “Nietzsche and Spinoza: Enemy-Brothers.” In The Oxford Handbook of Spinoza, ed. Della Rocca, Michael: 540–70. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zac, Sylvain 1965. Spinoza et l’interpretation de l’Écriture. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Zac, Sylvain 1989. Spinoza en Allemagne: Mendelssohn, Lessing et Jacobi. Paris: Méridiens Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Zammito, John H. 1997. “Herder, Kant, Spinoza und die Ursprünge des deutschen Idealismus.” In Herder und die Philosophie des deutschen Idealismus, ed. Heinz, M.: 107–44. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Zaoui, P. 1995. “La ‘grande identité’ Nietzsche-Spinoza: quelle identité?,” Philosophie 47: 6486.Google Scholar
Zohar [Heb: Book of Splendor]. 1998. Jerusalem: Press of the Kabbalist Academy of Nehar Shalom.Google Scholar