Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T16:22:21.828Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2024

David Lay Williams
Affiliation:
DePaul University, Chicago
Matthew W. Maguire
Affiliation:
DePaul University, Chicago
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Oeuvres complètes de Jean-Jacques Rousseau, ed. Gagnebin, Bernard and Raymond, Marcel. 5 vols. Bibliothèque De La Pléiade. Paris: Gallimard, 1959–95.Google Scholar
The Collected Writings of Rousseau, ed. Masters, Roger D. and Kelly, Christopher. 13 vols. Hanover: Published for Dartmouth College by University Press of New England, 1990–2010.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Of the Social Contract and Other Political Writings, ed. Bertram, Christopher; trans. Quintin Hoare. Penguin Classics. London: Penguin, 2012.Google Scholar
Rousseau: The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings, ed. and trans. Gourevitch, Victor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Jean-Jacques Rousseau: Fundamental Political Writings, ed. Maguire, Matthew W. and Williams, David Lay; trans. Ian Johnston. Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press, 2018.Google Scholar
The Major Political Writings of Jean-Jacques Rousseau, trans. and ed. Scott, John T.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Althusser, Louis. 2007. Politics and History: Montesquieu, Rosseau, Marx, trans. Ben Brewster. New York: Verso Books.Google Scholar
Arena, Valentina. 2016. “The Roman Republic of Jean-Jacques Rousseau.” History of Political Thought 37/1: 831.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1958. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1963. On Revolution. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . 2009. The Nicomachean Ethics, trans. Ross, David. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Augustine, . 1984. The City of God, trans. Henry Bettenson. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Babbitt, Irving. 1919. Rousseau and Romanticism. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Barnard, F. M. 1983. “National Culture and Political Legitimacy: Herder and Rousseau.” Journal of the History of Ideas 44: 231–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnard, F. M. 1988. Self-Direction and Political Legitimacy: Rousseau and Herder. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bayle, Pierre. 2000. Various Thoughts on the Occasion of a Comet, trans. Robert Bartlett. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Beiner, Ronald. 1993. “Machiavelli, Hobbes, and Rousseau on Civil Religion.” Review of Politics 55: 617–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beiner, Ronald. 2011. Civil Religion: A Dialogue in the History of Political Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bellah, Robert. 1974. “Civil Religion in America,” in American Civil Religion, ed. Richey, Russell E. and Jones, Donald G.. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. 1994. “Deliberative Rationality and Models of Democratic Legitimacy.” Constellations 1: 2652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah. 1969. Four Essays on Liberty, ed. Hardy, Henry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah. 1998. The Crooked Timber of Humanity, ed. Hardy, Henry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah. 1999. The Roots of Romanticism, ed. Hardy, Henry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah. 2002. Freedom and Its Betrayal: Six Enemies of Human Liberty, ed. Hardy, Henry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah. 2003. Freedom and Its Betrayal, ed. Hardy, Henry. London: Pimlico.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah. 2014. Political Ideas in the Romantic Age: Their Rise and Influence on Modern Thought, rev. ed., ed. Hardy, Henry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bernardi, Bruno, Guénard, Florent, and Silvestrini, Gabriella, eds. 2005. La Religion, la liberte, la justice: Un commentaire des Lettres écrites de la montagne de Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Bertram, Christopher. 2004. Rousseau and The Social Contract. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bertram, Christopher. 2009. “Toleration and Pluralism in Rousseau’s Civil Religion,” in Rousseau and l’Infâme: Religion, Toleration, and Fanaticism in the Age of Enlightenment, ed. Mostefai, Ourida and Scott, John T.. Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 137–52.Google Scholar
Bloom, Allan. 1979. “Introduction,” to his edition of Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Emile, or On Education. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Boss, Ronald. 1971. “Rousseau’s Civil Religion and the Meaning of Belief: An Answer to Bayle’s Paradox.” Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century 84: 123–93.Google Scholar
Boyd, Richard. 2013. “Rousseau and the Vanishing Concept of the Political.” European Journal of Political Theory 12: 7483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, Richard. 2015. “Justice, Beneficence, and Boundaries: Rousseau and the Paradox of Generality,” in Farr, James and Williams, David, eds., The General Will: Evolution of a Concept. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 247–69.Google Scholar
Brecht, Bertolt. 1965. “The Measures Taken,” in The Jewish Wife and Other Short Plays. New York: Grove Press, pp. 917.Google Scholar
Brooke, Christopher. 2016a. “Isaiah Berlin and the Origins of the Totalitarian Rousseau,” in Isaiah Berlin and the Enlightenment, ed. Brockliss, Laurence and Robertson, Ritchie. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 8998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooke, Christopher. 2016b. “Rawls on Rousseau and the General Will,” in The General Will: The Evolution of a Concept, ed. Williams, David Lay and Farr, James. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 429–66.Google Scholar
Brooke, Christopher. 2016c. “‘The Porch to a Collectivism as Absolute as the Mind of Man Has Ever Conceived’: Rousseau Scholarship in Britain from the Great War to the Cold War,” in Engaging with Rousseau: Reaction and Interpretation from the Eighteenth Century to the Present, ed. Livschitz, Ari. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 136–51.Google Scholar
Carr, E. H. 1945. Nationalism and After. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Carrithers, David W. 2001. “Democratic and Aristocratic Republics: Ancient and Modern,” in Montesquieu’s Science of Politics: Essays on the “Spirit of the Laws,” ed. Carrithers, David W., Mosher, Michael A., and Rahe, Paul A.. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 109–58.Google Scholar
Carter, Ian. 2011. “Respect and the Basis of Equality.” Ethics 121/3: 538–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. 1932. “L’unité dans l’œuvre de Jean-Jacques Rousseau.Bulletin de la société française de philosophie 32/2: 4666.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. 1945. Rousseau, Kant and Goethe, trans. James Gutmann, Paul Oskar Kristeller, and John Herman Randall, Jr. New York: Harper Torchbooks.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. 1963. The Question of Jean-Jacques Rousseau, trans. Peter Gay. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Cavallar, Georg. 2012. “Educating Émile: Jean-Jacques Rousseau on Cosmopolitanism.” The European Legacy 17: 485–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cherniss, Joshua L. 2013. A Mind and Its Time: The Development of Isaiah Berlin’s Political Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobban, Alfred. 1964. Rousseau and the Modern State. London: Archon Books.Google Scholar
Cohen, Joshua. 2010. Rousseau: A Free Community of Equals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohler, Anne M. 1970. Rousseau & Nationalism. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Collins, Jeffrey R. 2005. The Allegiance of Thomas Hobbes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, Laurence D. 2008. Eros in Plato, Rousseau, and Nietzsche: The Politics of Infinity. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State Press.Google Scholar
Cortes, Alyssa. 2020. “Zeal without Fanaticism: Jean-Jacques Rousseau on the Religion of the Citizen.” Review of Politics 82: 199224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cousin, Jean. 1964. “J.-J. Rousseau, interprète des institutions romaines dans le Contrat Social,” in Etudes sur le Contrat Social. Paris: Publications de l’Université de Dijon, pp. 1334.Google Scholar
Cranston, Maurice. 1984. “Rousseau on Equality.” Social Philosophy & Policy 2: 115–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crocker, Lester G. 1968. Rousseau’s Social Contract: An Interpretive Essay. Cleveland, OH: Case Western Reserve University Press.Google Scholar
Cusher, Brent Edwin. 2016. “Rousseau’s Platonic Teaching on the Virtuous Legislator,” in On Civil Republicanism: Ancient Lessons for Global Politics, ed. Kellow, Geoffrey C. and Leddy, Nevin. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 226–45.Google Scholar
Daly, Eoin. 2021. “Providence and Contingency in Corsica: Rousseau on Freedom without Politics.” European Journal of Political Theory 20: 739–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damrosch, Leo. 2005. Jean-Jacques Rousseau: Restless Genius. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen. 2009. The Second-Person Standpoint: Morality, Respect, and Accountability. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Dijn, Annelien. 2018. “Rousseau and Republicanism.” Political Theory 46/1: 5980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dent, N. J. H. 1988. Rousseau: An Introduction to His Psychological, Social and Political Theory. New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dent, Nicholas. 1992. A Rousseau Dictionary. London: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dent, Nicholas. 2005. Rousseau. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Descartes, René. 1953. Discours de la méthode in Oeuvres complètes, ed. Bridoux, André. Paris: Gallimard, Bibliothèque de la Pléiade.Google Scholar
Diogenes Laertius, . 1972. Lives of the Eminent Philosophers, trans. R. D. Hicks. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Douglass, Robin. 2013. “Rousseau’s Critique of Representative Sovereignty: Principled or Pragmatic? Rousseau and Representative Sovereignty.” American Journal of Political Science 57/3: 735–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglass, Robin. 2015a. Rousseau and Hobbes: Nature, Free Will, and the Passions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglass, Robin. 2015b. “What’s Wrong with Inequality? Some Rousseauian Perspectives.” European Journal of Political Theory 14: 368–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglass, Robin. 2018. “Theorising Commercial Society: Rousseau, Smith and Hont.” European Journal of Political Theory 17: 501–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durkheim, Emile. 2014. The Division of Labor in Society. Trans. W. D. Halls. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Edelstein, Dan. 2009. The Terror of Natural Right: Republicanism, The Cult of Nature and the French Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engel, Steven T. 2005. “Rousseau and Imagined Communities.” Review of Politics 67: 515–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
d’Entrèves, Alexander Passerin. 1994. Natural Law: An Introduction to Legal Philosophy. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Estlund, David M., Waldron, Jeremy, Grofman, Bernard, and Feld, Scott L.. 1989. “Democratic Theory and the Public Interest: Condorcet and Rousseau Revisited.” American Political Science Review 83/4: 1317–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleischacker, Samuel. 2004. A Short History of Distributive Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, Samuel. 1990. “Reason and Agreement in Social Contract Views.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 19/2: 122–57.Google Scholar
Gais, Amy. 2018. “Bound by Belief: Rethinking the Liberty of Conscience in Early Modern Political Thought.” Ph.D. thesis, Yale University.Google Scholar
Garsten, Bryan. 2006. Saving Persuasion: A Defense of Rhetoric and Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girard, Charles. 2010. “Jean-Jacques Rousseau et la démocratie délibérative: Débat public et légitimité,” in Modernités de Rousseau, ed. Spector, Céline. Pessac: Presses Universitaires de Bordeaux, pp. 199221.Google Scholar
Gordon, Bruce. 2009. Calvin. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gourevitch, Victor. 2019. “Introduction and Notes,” to The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings, 2nd ed., ed. Gourevitch, Victor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. xlxii.Google Scholar
Grace, Eve and Kelly, Christopher, eds. 2019. The Rousseauian Mind. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, Ruth. 1997. Hypocrisy and Integrity: Machiavelli, Rousseau and the Ethics of Politics. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griswold, Charles. 2015. “Liberty and Compulsory Civil Religion in Rousseau’s ‘Social Contract.’” Journal of the History of Philosophy 53: 271300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grofman, Bernard and Feld, Scott. L.. 1988. “Rousseau’s General Will: A Condorcetian Perspective.” The American Political Science Review 82/2: 567–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guéhenno, Jean. 1966. Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Vol. 2: 1758–1778, trans. John and Doreen Weightman. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contribution to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, Alexander, Madison, James, and Jay, John. 2005. The Federalist, ed.Pole, J. R.. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Hanley, Ryan Patrick. 2008. “Enlightened Nation Building: The ‘Science of the Legislator’ in Adam Smith and Rousseau.” American Journal of Political Science 52: 219–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanley, Ryan Patrick. 2013. “Political Economy and Individual Liberty,” in The Challenge of Rousseau, ed. Grace, Eve and Kelly, Christopher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3456.Google Scholar
Hanley, Ryan Patrick. 2017. Love’s Enlightenment: Rethinking Charity in Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harcourt, Bernard E. 2011. The Illusion of Free Markets: Punishment and the Myth of Natural Order. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazony, Yoram. 2018. The Virtue of Nationalism. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Hendel, Charles. 1934. Jean-Jacques Rousseau: Moralist. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hendel, Charles. 1962. Jean-Jacques Rousseau: Moralist, vol. 2, rev. ed. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Hill, Mark J. 2017. “Enlightened ‘Savages’: Rousseau’s Social Contract and the ‘Brave People’ of Corsica.” History of Political Thought 38: 462–93.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, Eric and Ranger, Terence, eds. 1983. The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1968. Leviathan. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1994. Leviathan, ed. Curley, Edwin. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 2011. Leviathan, rev. ed., ed. Martinich, A. P. and Battiste, Brian. Peterborough: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
Honig, Bonnie. 2007. “Between Decision and Deliberation: Political Paradox in Democratic Theory.” American Political Science Review 101/1: 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hont, István. 2015. Politics in Commercial Society: Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Adam Smith, ed. Kapossy, Béla and Sonenscher, Michael. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoye, J. Matthew. 2019. “Natural Justice, Law, and Virtue in Hobbes’s Leviathan.” Hobbes Studies 32: 179208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inbar, Avner 2019. “The Rehabilitation of Amour-propre.” History of Political Thought 40: 458–83.Google Scholar
Jouvenel, Bertrand de. 1947. “La Politique de Rousseau,” in Du Contrat Social de Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Geneva: Constant Bourquin, 13160.Google Scholar
Karant, Joshua. 2016. “Revisiting Rousseau’s Civil Religion.” Philosophy and Social Criticism 42: 1028–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kedourie, Elie. 1993. Nationalism. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Keller, Abraham C. 1939. “Plutarch and Rousseau’s First Discourse.” PMLA 54: 212–22.Google Scholar
Kelly, Christopher. 1987. “‘To Persuade without Convincing’: The Language of Rousseau’s Legislator.” American Journal of Political Science 31/2: 321–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Christopher. 1993. “Rousseau on the Foundation of National Cultures.” History of European Ideas 16: 521–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Christopher. 2013. “Rousseau and the Illustrious Montesquieu,” in The Challenge of Rousseau, ed. Grace, Eve and Kelly, Christopher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1933.Google Scholar
Kelly, George A. 1988. “Bayle’s Commonwealth of Atheists Revisited.” Nomos: Religion, Morality and the Law 30: 78109.Google Scholar
Kingston, Rebecca. 2019. “Rousseau’s Debt to Plutarch,” in The Rousseauvian Mind, ed. Grace, Eve and Kelly, Christopher. London: Routledge, pp. 2333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, Nannerl. 1980. Philosophy and the State in France. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koestler, Arthur. 2019. Darkness at Noon, trans. Philip Boehm. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Landrum, Lisa. 2015. “Before Architecture: Archai, Architects and Architectonics in Plato and Aristotle.” Montreal Architectural Review 2: 525.Google Scholar
Lane, Melissa. 2015. “Roman Censorship, Spartan Parallels and Modern Uses in Rousseau’s Social Contract,” in Censorship Moments: Reading Texts in the History of Censorship and Freedom of Expression, ed. Kemp, Geoff. London: Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 95102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Letwin, Shirley. 1999. “Skepticism and Toleration in Hobbes’ Political Thought,” in Early Modern Skepticism and the Origins of Toleration, ed. Levine, Alan. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, pp. 165178.Google Scholar
Levy, Jacob T. 2006. “Beyond Publius: Montesquieu, Liberal Republicanism and the Small-Republic Thesis.” History of Political Thought 27/1: 5090.Google Scholar
Lincoln, Abraham. 2012. “Address to the Young Men’s Lyceum,” in The Writings of Abraham Lincoln, ed. Smith, Steven B.. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, pp. 713.Google Scholar
Livy, . 1998. The Rise of Rome, trans. T. J. Luce. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1980. Second Treatise of Government, ed. Macpherson, C. B.. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1988. Two Treatises of Government, ed. Laslett, Peter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolò. 1996. Discourses on Livy, trans. Harvey C. Mansfield and Nathan Tarcov. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolò. 1998a. Discourses on Livy, trans. Harvey C. Mansfield and Nathan Tarcov. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolo. 1998b. The Prince, ed. and trans. Mansfield, Harvey. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maguire, Matthew. 2006. The Conversion of Imagination: From Pascal through Rousseau to Tocqueville. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Maguire, Matthew W. and Williams, David Lay. 2018. “Introduction and Notes,” to Jean-Jacques Rousseau: Fundamental Political Writings. Peterborough: Broadview Press, pp. 938.Google Scholar
Maistre, Joseph de. 1965. The Works of Joseph de Maistre, ed. Jack Lively, . New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Maloy, J. S. 2005. “The Very Order of Things: Rousseau’s Tutorial Republicanism.” Polity 37: 235–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manin, Bernard. 2010. The Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marks, Jonathan. 2005. Perfection and Disharmony in the Thought of Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, Jonathan. 2006. “The Divine Instinct?: Rousseau and Conscience.” Review of Politics 68/4: 565–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsilius of Padua, . 1980. Defensor Pacis, trans. Alan Gewirth. Toronto: Medieval Academy of America.Google Scholar
Masters, Roger. 1968. The Political Philosophy of Rousseau. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
McCormick, John P. 2007. “Rousseau’s Rome and the Repudiation of Populist Republicanism.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 10: 327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCormick, John P. 2018. Reading Machiavelli: Scandalous Books, Suspect Engagements, and the Virtue of Populist Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
McLendon, Michael Locke. 2009. “Rousseau, Amour-Propre, and Intellectual Celebrity.” Journal of Politics 71/2: 506–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLendon, Michael Locke. 2018. The Psychology of Inequality: Rousseau’s Amour-Propre. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Meier, Heinrich. 1998. The Lesson of Carl Schmitt: Four Chapters on the Distinction between Political Theology and Political Philosophy, trans. Marcus Brainard. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Meier, Heinrich. 2016. “On the Lawgiver: Rousseau’s Articulation of the Political Problem,” in Principle and Prudence in Western Political Thought, ed. Lynch, Christopher and Marks, Jonathan. Albany: SUNY Press, pp. 171–90.Google Scholar
Melzer, Arthur M. 1990. The Natural Goodness of Man: On the System of Rousseau’s Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendham, Matthew D. 2020. “A Lover of Peace or a Vile Insurgent? Rousseau, Geneva and the Right to Revolution, c.1762–8.” History of Political Thought 41: 120–54.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1982. “Parties and the Ministry,” in Essays on England, Ireland, and the Empire: Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vol. 6, ed. Robson, John M.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, James. 1984. Rousseau: Dreamer of Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Nicola. 2016. “Reading Rousseau in Spanish America during the Wars of Independence,” in Engaging With Rousseau, ed. Lifschitz, Avi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 114–35.Google Scholar
Monter, E. William. 1975. Calvin’s Geneva. Huntington: Robert E. Krieger.Google Scholar
Montaigne, Michel de. 1958. The Complete Essays, trans. Donald Frame. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montesquieu, Charles Louis de Secondat, Baron de. 1951. De l’esprit des lois, in Oeuvres complètes, 2 vols., ed. Callois, Roger. Paris: Bibliothèque de la Pléiade, Gallimard, vol. 2, pp. 225995.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, Charles Louis de Secondat, Baron de. 1989. The Spirit of the Laws, trans. Anne Choler, Basia Miller, and Harold Stone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, Charles de. 1994. The Spirit of the Laws. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Müller, Jan-Werner. 2008a. Constitutional Patriotism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Müller, Jan-Werner. 2008b. “Fear and Freedom: On ‘Cold War Liberalism.’” European Journal of Political Theory 7/1: 4564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Liam and Nagel, Thomas. 2004. The Myth of Ownership: Taxes and Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Muthu, Sankar. 2015. “On the General Will of Humanity: Global Connections in Rousseau’s Political Thought,” in The General Will: Evolution of a Concept, ed. Farr, James and Williams, David Lay. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 270306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neidleman, Jason. 2012. “Rousseau’s Rediscovered Communion des Cœurs: Cosmopolitanism in the Reveries of the Solitary Walker.” Political Studies 60: 7694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neidleman, Jason. 2016. Rousseau’s Ethics of Truth: A Sublime Science of Simple Souls. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neidleman, Jason. 2020. “Politics and Tragedy: The Case of Rousseau.” Political Research Quarterly 73/2: 464–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Eric. 2010. The Hebrew Republic: Jewish Sources and the Transformation of European Political Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuhouser, Frederick. 1993. “Freedom, Dependence, and the General Will.” The Philosophical Review 102/3: 363–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuhouser, Frederick. 2008. Rousseau’s Theodicy of Self-Love: Evil, Rationality, and the Drive for Recognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuhouser, Frederick. 2013. “Rousseau’s Critique of Economic Inequality.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 41/3: 193225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuhouser, Frederick. 2014. Rousseau’s Critique of Inequality: Reconstructing the Second Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakeshott, Michael. 1991. “Introduction to ‘Leviathan’,” in Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, pp. 221–94.Google Scholar
O’Hagan, Timothy. 1978. “Rousseau, Conservative or Revolutionary: A Critique of Levi-Strauss.” Critique of Anthropology 3.11: 1938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Hagan, Timothy 2010. “Rousseau’s Theodicy of Self-Love: Evil, Rationality, and the Drive for Recognition by Frederick Neuhouser.” Mind 119: 219–25.Google Scholar
Oprea, Alexandra. 2019. “Pluralism and the General Will: The Roman and Spartan Models in Rousseau’s Social Contract.” Review of Politics 81: 573–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orwin, Clifford. 1997. “Rousseau and the Discovery of Political Compassion,” in The Legacy of Rousseau, ed. Orwin, Clifford and Tarcov, Nathan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 296320.Google Scholar
Ozouf, Mona. 1988. Festivals and the French Revolution, trans. Alan Sheridan. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pangle, Thomas L. 1973. Montesquieu’s Philosophy of Liberalism: A Commentary on “The Spirit of the Laws.” Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parry, Geraint 1988. “Émile: Learning to be Men, Women, and Citizens,” in The Cambridge Companion to Rousseau, ed. Riley, Patrick. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 247–71.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carol. 1970. Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, Philip. 1997. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip. 2013. “Two Republican Traditions,” in Republican Democracy: Law, Liberty and Politics, ed. Niederberger, Andreas and Schink, Philipp. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press, 169204.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip. 2014. Just Freedom: A Moral Compass for a Complex World. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip. 2016. “Rousseau’s Dilemma,” in Engaging with Rousseau: Reception and Interpretation from the Eighteenth Century to the Present, ed. Lifschitz, Avi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 168–88.Google Scholar
Pierson, Chris. 2013. “Rousseau and the Paradoxes of Property.” European Journal of Political Theory 12/4: 409–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piketty, Thomas. 2014. Capital in the Twenty-First Century, trans. Arthur Goldhammer. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piketty, Thomas. 2020. Capital and Ideology, trans. Arthur Goldhammer. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Plato, . 1979. The Laws of Plato, trans. Thomas L. Pangle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Plato, . 1980. The Laws, trans. Thomas Pangle. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Plato, . 1997. Republic and Statesman in Complete Works, ed. Cooper, John M.. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Plato, . 2004. Republic, trans. C. D. C. Reeve. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Plattner, Marc F. 1997. “Rousseau and the Origins of Nationalism,” in The Legacy of Rousseau, ed. Orwin, Clifford and Tarcov, Nathan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 183–99.Google Scholar
Plutarch, . 2001. Lives, trans. Arthur Hugh Clough. New York: Modern Library.Google Scholar
Putterman, Ethan. 2001. “Realism and Reform in Rousseau’s Constitutional Projects for Poland and Corsica.” Political Studies 49/3: 481–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putterman, Ethan. 2003. “Rousseau on Agenda-Setting and Majority Rule.” American Political Science Review 97/3: 459–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putterman, Ethan. 2005. “Rousseau on the People as Legislative Gatekeepers, Not Framers.” American Political Science Review 99/1: 145–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putterman, Ethan. 2010. Rousseau, Law and the Sovereignty of the People. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qvortrup, Mads. 2018. The Political Philosophy of Rousseau: The Impossibility of Reason. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Rahe, Paul A. 2009a. Montesquieu and the Logic of Liberty. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rahe, Paul A. 2009b. Soft Despotism, Democracy’s Drift: Montesquieu, Rousseau, Tocqueville, and The Modern Prospect. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1999a. Collected Papers, ed. Freeman, Samuel. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1999b. A Theory of Justice, rev. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. 2007. Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy, ed. Freeman, Samuel. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. 2008. Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy, ed. Freeman, S. R.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichenberg, Marguerite. 1932. “Essai sur les lectures de Rousseau.” PhD diss., University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Reisert, Joseph P. 2003. Jean-Jacques Rousseau: A Friend to Virtue. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, Patrick. 1982. Will and Political Legitimacy: A Critical Exposition of Social Contract Theory in Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau, Kant, and Hegel. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, Patrick. 1986. The General Will before Rousseau: The Transformation of the Divine into the Civic. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ripstein, Arthur. 1992. “The General Will.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 9/1: 5166.Google Scholar
Rosenblatt, Helena. 1997. Rousseau and Geneva: From the First Discourse to the Social Contract, 1749–1762. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenblatt, Helena. 2008. “Rousseau, the Anticosmopolitan?Daedalus 137: 5967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousselière, Geneviève. 2024. Sharing Freedom: Republicanism and Exclusion in Revolutionary France. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1972. A History of Western Philosophy. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M. 2018. Why Does Inequality Matter? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, Denise. 2010. “Realism, Rhetoric and the Possibility of Reform in Rousseau’s Considerations on the Government of Poland.” Polity 42/3: 377–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaeffer, Denise. 2012. “Attending to Time and Place in Rousseau’s Legislative Art.” The Review of Politics 74: 421–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. 1996. The Leviathan in the State Theory of Thomas Hobbes: Meaning and Failure of a Political Symbol, trans. George Schwab and Erna Hilfstein. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Schwartzberg, Melissa. 2008. “Voting the General Will: Rousseau on Decision Rules.” Political Theory 36/3: 403–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartzberg, Melissa. 2010. “Shouts, Murmurs, and Votes: Acclamation and Aggregation in Ancient Greece.” Journal of Political Philosophy 18/4: 448–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartzberg, Melissa. 2013. Counting the Many: The Origins and Limits of Supermajority Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartzberg, Melissa. 2024. “Passive-Aggressive Citizens,” in Tuck, Richard, Active and Passive Citizens, ed. Macedo., Stephen Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, John T. 1997. “Rousseau and the Melodious Language of Freedom.” The Journal of Politics 59/3: 803–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, John T. 2005. “Rousseau’s Anti–Agenda-Setting Agenda and Contemporary Democratic Theory.” American Political Science Review 99/1: 137–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, John T. 2012. “Emile et les principes du droit politique: le précis partiel du Social Contract et la double vise de la théorie politique de Rousseau,” in Rousseau 2012, ed. O’Dea, Michael. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation, pp. 129–50.Google Scholar
Scott, John T. and Zeretsky, Robert. 2009. The Philosophers’ Quarrel: Rousseau, Hume, and the Limits of Human Understanding. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Seung, T. K. 1996. Plato Rediscovered: Human Value and Social Order. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Ian and Steinmetz, Alicia. 2018. “Negative Liberty and the Cold War,” in The Cambridge Companion to Isaiah Berlin, ed. Cherniss, Joshua L. and Smith, Steven B.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 192211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shklar, Judith N. 1969. Men and Citizens: A Study of Rousseau’s Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith N. 1978. “Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Equality.” Daedalus 107/3: 1325.Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith N. 1998. “Montesquieu and the New Republicanism,” in Political Thought and Political Thinkers, ed. Hoffman, Stanley. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 244–61.Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith N. 2001. “Rousseau’s Images of Authority (Especially in La Nouvelle Héloise),” in The Cambridge Companion to Rousseau, ed. Riley, Patrick. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Silk, Mark. 2004. “Numa Pompilius and the Idea of Civil Religion in the West.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 72: 863–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverthorne, J. M. 1973. “Rousseau’s Plato.” Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century 116: 235–49.Google Scholar
Silvestrini, Gabriella. 1993. Alle radici del pensiero di Rousseau. Milan: FrancoAngeli.Google Scholar
Simmons, John. 1992. The Lockean Theory of Rights. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, Matthew. 2006a. “A Paradox of Sovereignty in the Social Contract.” Journal of Moral Philosophy 3: 4758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, Matthew. 2006b. Rousseau’s Theory of Freedom. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Simpson, Matthew C. 2019. “The Social Contract,” in The Rousseauian Mind, ed. Grace, Eve and Kelly, Christopher. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Siroky, David and Sigwart, Hans-Jörg. 2014. “Principle and Prudence: Rousseau on Private Property and Inequality.” Polity 46/3: 381406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 2012. Liberty Before Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1982. The Theory of Moral Sentiments, ed. Raphael, D. D. and Macfie, A. L.. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Smith, Jeffrey A. 2003. “Nationalism, Virtue, and the Spirit of Liberty in Rousseau’s Government of Poland.” The Review of Politics 65: 409–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonenscher, Michael 2017. “Rousseau and the Foundations of Modern Political Thought.” Modern Intellectual History 14: 311–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonenscher, Michael. 2020. Jean-Jacques Rousseau: The Division of Labour, the Politics of Imagination, and the Concept of Federal Government. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spector, Céline. 2004. Montesquieu: Pouvoirs, richesses et sociétés. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Spector, Céline. 2006. Montesquieu et l’émergence de l’économie politique. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Spector, Céline. 2011. Au prisme de Rousseau: Usages politiques contemporains. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation.Google Scholar
Spector, Céline. 2015. Rousseau: Les paradoxes de l’autonomie démocratique. Paris: Michalon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spector, Céline. 2016. “Rousseau at Harvard: John Rawls and Judith Shklar on Realistic Utopia,” in Engaging with Rousseau: Reaction and Interpretation from the Eighteenth Century to the Present, ed. Lifschitz, Avi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 152–67.Google Scholar
Spector, Céline. 2019. Rousseau. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Spitz, Jean-Fabien. 2016. “Rousseau and the Redistributive Republic,” in Engaging with Rousseau, ed. Lifschitz, A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 7494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sreenivasan, Gopal. 2000. “What Is the General Will?The Philosophy Review 109/4: 545–81.Google Scholar
Stilz, Anna. 2009. Liberal Loyalty: Freedom, Obligation, and the State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stilz, Anna. 2017. “Property Rights: Natural or Conventional?” in The Routledge Handbook of Libertarianism, ed. Brennan, Jason, van der Vossen, Bas, and Schmidtz, David. New York: Routledge, pp. 244–58.Google Scholar
Swenson, James. 2000. On Jean-Jacques Rousseau: Considered as One of the First Authors of the Revolution. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Talmon, Jacob L. 1919. The Origins of Totalitarian Democracy. London: Mercury Books.Google Scholar
Talmon, Jacob L. 1952. The Origins of Totalitarian Democracy. London: Secker and Warburg.Google Scholar
Tamir, Yael. 1993. Liberal Nationalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Teichgraeber, III, Richard. 1981. “Rousseau’s Argument for Property.” History of European Ideas 2/2: 115–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terrasse, Jean, 1970. Jean-Jacques Rousseau et la quête de l’âge d’or. Brussels: Palais de l’Academie.Google Scholar
Thurow, Glen. 1976. Abraham Lincoln and American Political Religion. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. 2004. Democracy in America, trans. Arthur Goldhammer. New York: Library of America.Google Scholar
Trachtenberg, Zev M. 1999. Making Citizens: Rousseau’s Political Theory of Culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Trachtenberg, Zev. 2001. “Rousseau’s Platonic Rejection of Politics,” in Rousseau and the Ancients, ed. Grant, Ruth and Stewart, Philip. Montreal: Pensée Libre, pp. 182–97.Google Scholar
Trojan, Cody. 2019. “Republican Authority: Institutions and Manners of Early Modern Legitimacy,” PhD diss., UCLA.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard. 2016. The Sleeping Sovereign: The Invention of Modern Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard. 2017. “Rousseau and Hobbes: The Hobbesianism of Rousseau,” in Thinking with Rousseau: From Machiavelli to Schmitt, ed. Rosenblatt, Helena and Schweigert, Paul. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuck, Richard. 2024. Active and Passive Citizens, ed. Macedo., Stephen Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Urbinati, Nadia. 2006. Representative Democracy: Principles and Genealogy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urbinati, Nadia. 2012. “Rousseau on the Risks of Representing the Sovereign.” Politische Vierteljahresschrift 53/4: 646–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dongen, Els, and Chang, Yuan. 2017. “After Revolution: Reading Rousseau in 1990s China.” Contemporary Chinese Thought. 48.1: 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaughan, Charles Edwyn. 1962. “Introduction” and “Editorial Notes” to The Political Writings of Jean-Jacques Rousseau. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Virgil, . 2006. Aeneid, trans. Robert Fagles. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Viroli, Maurizio. 1988. Jean-Jacques Rousseau and the “Well-Ordered Society,” trans. Derek Hanson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viroli, Maurizio. 1995. For Love of Country: An Essay on Patriotism and Nationalism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Viroli, Maurizio. 2017. “Rousseau and Machiavelli: Two Interpretations of Republicanism,” in Thinking with Rousseau: From Machiavelli to Schmitt, ed. Rosenblatt, Helena and Schweigert, Paul. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vlastos, Gregory. 1981. Platonic Studies, 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Waksman, Vera. 2010. “‘Les difficultés étaient dans la nature de la chose’: De la religion, de l’homme et du citoyen,” in La théologie politique de Rousseau, ed. Waterlot, Ghislain. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes, pp. 91108.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. 2017. One Another’s Equals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, John M. 2015. Rousseau and the Problem of Human Relations. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Warner, John M. and Zink., James R. 2016. “Therapeutic Politics: Rawls’s Respect for Rousseau.” The Review of Politics 78: 117–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weirich, Paul. 1992. “Rousseau on Equality.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 9/2: 191–8.Google Scholar
Whatmore, Richard. 2012. Against War and Empire: Geneva, Britain and France in the Eighteenth Century. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, David Lay. 2001. “Political Ontology and Institutional Design in Montesquieu and Rousseau.” American Journal of Political Science 54: 525–42.Google Scholar
Williams, David Lay. 2005. “Modern Theorist of Tyranny? Lessons from Rousseau’s System of Checks and Balances.” Polity 37/4: 443–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, David Lay. 2007. Rousseau’s Platonic Enlightenment. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, David Lay. 2010. “Political Ontology and Institutional Design in Montesquieu and Rousseau.” American Journal of Political Science 54/2: 525–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, David Lay. 2014. Rousseau’s Social Contract: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, David Lay. 2021. “Hobbes on Wealth, Poverty, and Economic Inequality.” Hobbes Studies 34: 957.Google Scholar
Williams, David Lay. 2024. “The Greatest of All Plagues”: How Economic Inequality Shaped Political Thought from Plato to Marx. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wokler, Robert. 2012. “Rousseau’s Two Concepts of Liberty,” in Rousseau, the Age of Enlightenment, and Their Legacies, ed. Garsten, Bryan. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 154–84.Google Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon S. 2001. Tocqueville between Two Worlds. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Allen W. 2014. The Free Development of Each: Studies on Freedom, Right, and Ethics in Classical German Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yack, Bernard. 1992. The Longing for Total Revolution: Philosophic Sources of Social Discontent from Rousseau to Marx and Nietzsche. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuckert, Michael. 2001. “Natural Law, Natural Rights, and Classical Liberalism: Montesquieu’s Critique of Hobbes.” Social Philosophy and Policy 18: 227–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by David Lay Williams, DePaul University, Chicago, Matthew W. Maguire, DePaul University, Chicago
  • Book: The Cambridge Companion to Rousseau's <i>Social Contract</i>
  • Online publication: 28 March 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108989770.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by David Lay Williams, DePaul University, Chicago, Matthew W. Maguire, DePaul University, Chicago
  • Book: The Cambridge Companion to Rousseau's <i>Social Contract</i>
  • Online publication: 28 March 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108989770.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by David Lay Williams, DePaul University, Chicago, Matthew W. Maguire, DePaul University, Chicago
  • Book: The Cambridge Companion to Rousseau's <i>Social Contract</i>
  • Online publication: 28 March 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108989770.016
Available formats
×