Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-dc8c957cd-4x6s7 Total loading time: 0.325 Render date: 2022-01-29T04:33:18.611Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

9 - Public law and privatisation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2015

A.C.L. Davies
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Mark Elliott
Affiliation:
St Catharine's College, Cambridge
David Feldman
Affiliation:
Downing College, Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Most political scientists agree on some core functions for government: for example, to ensure that citizens enjoy a reasonable level of security, both in terms of maintaining order domestically and protecting the state from external attack. But beyond this core, there is little agreement about what else the state should do. In the United Kingdom, the role of the state has varied over time. In the 1950s, there was considerable expansion as many industries were nationalised and the welfare state was created. The government's proper role was thought to include the running of key parts of the economy, and the provision of health and social care to citizens. In the 1980s, the state began to shrink again, with the ‘privatisation’ of significant parts of the public sector, such as manufacturing industry and the utilities. And, where functions remained within the public sector, like social care or rubbish collection, the government encouraged much greater use of private firms to provide the services on a day-to-day basis. On this view, the government's task was to supervise private providers, rather than to provide the services itself.

In simple terms, the transfer of a previously public activity to the private sector involves a retreat of public law. Since public law regulates public sector activities, its intervention in what is now a private activity is not required. However, matters are not so simple in the majority of ‘privatisation’ cases, since the government often retains some control over the activity, either through regulation or through its ongoing role as the purchaser of a service under a contract. Public law remains potentially applicable to these situations.

The discussion will proceed in five parts. First, we will define the concept of ‘privatisation’ more precisely. Second, we will examine the relationship between the subject-matter of this chapter and broader debates about the public/private divide. In the third section, we will turn to the role of public law in regulating the process of privatising or contracting out a public service. Fourth, we will examine the role of public law in regulating public services once they have been privatised or contracted out. And fifth, we will consider the implications of privatisation and contracting out for the role of government and for democracy more generally.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arrowsmith, S., The Law of Public and Utilities Procurement (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 2014), rd ednGoogle Scholar
Craig, P., ‘Contracting Out, the Human Rights Act and the Scope of Judicial Review’ (2002) 118 Law Quarterly Review551Google Scholar
Davies, A. C. L., The Public Law of Government Contracts (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, A. C. L., ‘Beyond new public management: problems of accountability in the modern administrative state’ in Bamforth, N. and Leyland, P. (eds.), Accountability in the Contemporary Constitution (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar
Donnelly, C. M., Delegation of Governmental Power to Private Parties: A Comparative Perspective (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedland, M., ‘Public Law and Private Finance – Placing the Private Finance Initiative in a Public Frame’ [1998] Public Law288
Graham, C. and Prosser, T., Privatizing Public Enterprises: Constitutions, the State, and Regulation in Comparative Perspective (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991)Google Scholar
Vincent-Jones, P., The New Public Contracting: Regulation, Responsiveness, Relationality (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×