Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-8bbf57454-lngfr Total loading time: 0.254 Render date: 2022-01-22T00:56:14.934Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Book contents

10 - Catholic Confederates and the constitutional relationship between Ireland and England, 1641–1649

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2009

Micheál Ó Siochrú
Affiliation:
Leverhulme Research Fellow and lectures in History, University of Aberdeen
Ciaran Brady
Affiliation:
Trinity College, Dublin
Jane Ohlmeyer
Affiliation:
Trinity College, Dublin
Get access

Summary

On Wednesday 17 January 1649, at a lavish ceremony in Kilkenny Castle, the Catholic Confederates signed a peace treaty with the lord lieutenant, James Butler, marquis of Ormond. In an emotional speech, the chairman of the Confederate General Assembly, Sir Richard Blake, hoped the agreement would ‘restore this nation in its former lustre’. Ormond responded generously, with a promise of further concessions from the king. In an uncharacteristically dramatic flourish, he announced: ‘There are no bounds to your hopes.’ The mutually congratulatory nature of these proceedings belied the six years of tortuous and often rancorous negotiations which preceded the agreement. Historians of the mid-seventeenth century have tended to focus on the bitter religious divisions of the period. But attempts by Confederates and royalists to clarify the constitutional relationship between Ireland and England proved equally controversial. The operation of Poynings' Law and increasing interference by the English parliament in Irish affairs emerged as the two key points of contention during peace talks.

In an article on the political thought of Patrick Darcy, Aidan Clarke argues that the Confederate stance on Poynings' Law was an issue of trust rather than constitutional principle. They were only interested in a suspension of the act in order to speed up the ratification of treaty terms by the Irish parliament, without interference from the king.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
2
Cited by

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×