Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-6c8bd87754-9k7mv Total loading time: 1.088 Render date: 2022-01-19T09:28:12.284Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

Tsvi Kahana
Affiliation:
Queen's University, Ontario
Anat Scolnicov
Affiliation:
University of Winchester
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Boundaries of State, Boundaries of Rights
Human Rights, Private Actors, and Positive Obligations
, pp. 290 - 323
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Ackerman, Bruce, We the People: Foundations (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Adelstein, Richard, Firms as Persons (unpublished manuscript) (on file with author).
Alexy, Robert, A Theory of Constitutional Rights (Rivers, Julian trans., New York: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Allan, Trevor R.S., The Sovereignty of Law: Freedom, Constitution and Common Law (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alston, Philip, ed., Non-State Actors and Human Rights (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Alston, Philip & Goodman, Ryan, International Human Rights, 3rd ed. (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Alvarez, José E., The Public International Law Regime Governing International Investment (The Hague, Hague Academy of International Law, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Applebaum, Arthur, Ethics for Adversaries (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arai-Takahashi, Yutaka, The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine and the Principle of Proportionality in the Jurisprudence of the ECHR (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2002).Google Scholar
Arndt, Christiane & Oman, Charles, Uses and Abuses of Governance Indicators (Paris: Development Centre of the Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development, 2006).Google Scholar
Baxi, Upendra, The Future of Human Rights, 2nd ed. (New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, Pascalian Meditations (Nice, Richard trans., Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Brewer-Carías, Allan R., Constitutional Courts as Positive Legislators: A Comparative Law Study (Cambridge, UK & New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cane, Peter, Administrative Law, 4th ed. (Oxford: Clarendon, 2004).Google Scholar
Cass, Deborah, The Constitutionalization of the World Trade Organization (Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clapham, Andrew, Human Rights Obligations of Non-State Actors (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Colon-Rios, Joel, Weak Constitutionalism: Democratic Legitimacy and the Question of Constituent Power (London & New York: Routledge, 2012).Google Scholar
Conaglen, Matthew, Fiduciary Loyalty: Protecting the Due Performance of Non-Fiduciary Duties (Oxford & Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing, 2010).Google Scholar
Cooter, Robert D., The Strategic Constitution (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Davies, Anne C.L., The Public Law of Government Contracts (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Tocqueville, Alexis, Democracy in America (Mansfield, Harvey & Winthrop, Delba, trans. and ed., Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dicey, Albert, Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, 10th ed. (London: Macmillan, 1959).Google Scholar
Dolzer, Rudolf & Schreuer, Christoph, Principles of International Investment Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press: 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donnelly, Catherine M., Delegation of Governmental Power to Private Parties: A Comparative Perspective (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, Zachary, The International Law of Investment Claims (Cambridge, UK & New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, Taking Rights Seriously (London: Duckworth, 1977).Google ScholarPubMed
Fabre, Cecile, Social Rights under the Constitution: Government and the Decent Life (Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press & New York: Oxford University Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fredman, Sandra, Human Rights Transformed: Positive Rights and Positive Duties (Oxford, UK & New York: Oxford University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Daniel & Barak-Erez, Daphne eds., Human Rights in Private Law (Portland, Oregon: Hard Publishing, 2001).Google Scholar
Fox-Decent, Evan, Sovereignty’s Promise: The State as Fiduciary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glendon, Mary Ann, Rights Talk: The Impoverishment of Political Discourse (New York: Free Press & Toronto: Collier Macmillan & New York: Maxwell Macmillan, 1991).Google Scholar
Griffin, James, On Human Rights (Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guilhot, Nicolas, The Democracy Makers: Human Rights and International Order (New York: Columbia University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, David, A Brief History of Neoliberalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg W.F., The Philosophy of Right (Sir Knox, Thomas Malcolm trans., Lanham: Oxford University Press, 1967).Google Scholar
Hellman, Deborah & Moreau, Sophia, eds., Philosophical Foundations of Discrimination Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas, Leviathan (Tuck, Richard ed., Cambridge, UK & New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Hogg, Peter W., Constitutional Law of Canada vol. II, 5th ed. (Toronto: Thomson Carswell, 2007).Google Scholar
Ignatieff, Michael, Human Rights as Politics and Idolatry (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Jackson, Vicki C. & Tushnet, Mark, Comparative Constitutional Law, 3rd ed. (St Paul, Minn: Foundation Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Jacobsohn, Gary, Constitutional Identity (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, Hauptprobleme der Staatsrechtslehre (Aalen: Scientia, 1984) (Ger.).Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan, The Rise and Fall of Classical Legal Thought (Washington, DC: Beard Books, 2006, originally published 1975).Google Scholar
Krishnaswamy, Sudhir, Democracy and Constitutionalism in India: A Study of the Basic Structure Doctrine (New Delhi & Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will, Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Locke, John, Second Treatise of Government (1690), (Macpherson, Crawford Brough ed., Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1980).Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas, Law as a Social System (Kastner, Fatima, Nobles, Richard, Schiff, David & Ziegert, Rosamund eds., Ziegert, Klaus A. trans., Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas, Social Systems (Bednarz, John Jr & Baecker, Dirk trans., Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Mann, Howard, International Investments, Business, and Human Rights: Key Issues and Opportunities (2008), available at www.iisd.org/pdf/2008/iia_business_human_rights.pdf.
Markovits, Daniel, A Modern Legal Ethics: Adversary Advocacy in a Democratic Age (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
McCarthy, Cormac, No Country for Old Men (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2005).Google Scholar
McCarthy, Cormac, The Blood Meridian (London: Picador, 1990).Google Scholar
Moyn, Samuel, The Last Utopia: Human Rights in History (Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Neier, Aryeh, Taking Liberties: Four Decades in the Struggle for Rights (New York: Public Affairs, 2003).Google Scholar
Newcombe, Andrew & Paradell, Luís, Law and Practice of Investment Treaties (The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International, 2009).Google Scholar
Nolan, Donal & Robertson, Andrew eds., Rights and Private Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2011).Google Scholar
Oliver, Dawn, Common Values and the Public-Private Divide (London: Buttterworths, 1999).Google Scholar
Paulsson, Jan, Denial of Justice in International Law (Cambridge, UK & New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Luke Eric, Human Rights and Bilateral Investment Treaties: Mapping the Role of Human Rights Law within Investor-State Arbitration (2009), available at publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2012/dd-rd/E84-36-2009-eng.pdf.
Power, Michael, The Audit Explosion (London, UK: Demos, 1994).Google Scholar
Poynder, John, Literary Extracts (London: William Edward Painter, 342, Strand, 1844).Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph, The Morality of Freedom (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Roach, Kent, The Supreme Court on Trial: Judicial Activism or Democratic Dialogue (Toronto: Irwin Law, 2001).Google Scholar
Rose, Nikolas, Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought (Cambridge, UK & New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandel, Michael, Democracy’s Discontent: America in Search of a Public Philosophy (Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Schachter, Oscar, International Law in Theory and Practice (Dordrecht, Boston: M. Nijhoff Publishers, 1991).Google Scholar
Schapiro, Robert A., Polyphonic Federalism: Toward the Protection of Fundamental Rights (Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schill, Stephan W., ed., The Multilateralization of International Investment Law (Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneiderman, David, Resisting Economic Globalization: Critical Theory and International Investment Law (Hampshire & New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scolnicov, Anat, Religious Freedom in International Law: Between Group Right and Individual Right (Oxon & New York: Routledge, 2011).Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn, Mixed Signals: US Human Rights Policy and Latin America (Ithaca, NY & London: Cornell University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Sornarajah, Muthucumaraswamy, The International Law on Foreign Investment, 3rd ed. (Cambridge, UK & New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. & Holmes, Stephen, The Cost of Rights (New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 1999).Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther, Constitutional Fragments: Societal Constitutionalism and Globalization (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Jean, Public Rights, Private Relations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tushnet, Mark, Weak Courts, Strong Rights: Judicial Review and Social Welfare Rights in Comparative Constitutional Law (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
van der Walt, Johan, The Horizontal Effect Revolution and the Question of Sovereignty (Berlin & Boston: Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2014).Google Scholar
Verkuil, Paul R., Outsourcing Sovereignty: Why Privatization of Government Functions Threatens Democracy and What We Can Do about It (Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Bogdandy, Armin, Wolfrum, Rüdiger, von Bernstorff, Jochen, Dann, Philipp & Goldmann, Matthias eds., The Exercise of Public Authority by International Institutions (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sir Wade, William, Wade and Forsyth on Administrative Law, 7th ed. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Sir Wade, William, Wade & Forsyth, Administrative Law, 9th ed. (Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy, The Right to Private Property (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Weber, Max, Sociological Writings (New York: Continuum, 1994).Google Scholar
Weinrib, Ernest J., The Idea of Private Law (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
White, G. Edward, The Constitution and the New Deal (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Young, Katherine, Constituting Economic and Social Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zackin, Emily, Looking for Rights in All the Wrong Places: Why State Constitutions Contain America’s Positive Rights (Princeton & Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Secondary Sources

Alter, Karen J., The Multiple Roles of International Courts and Tribunals: Enforcement, Dispute Settlement, Constitutional and Administrative Review, in Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations 345 (Dunoff, Jeffrey L. & Pollack, Mark A. eds., New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Alvarez, José E. in this volume.
Alvarez, José E., The Evolving BIT, in Investment Treaty Arbitration and International Law 1 (Laird, Ian A. & Weiler, Todd eds., Huntington, NY: JurisNet, 2010).Google Scholar
Alvarez, José E., What are International Judges For? The Main Functions of International Adjudication, in The Oxford Handbook on International Adjudication 158 (Romano, Cesare, Alter, Karen J. & Shany, Yuval eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Aronson, Mark, A Public Lawyer’s Responses to Privatisation and Outsourcing, in The Province of Administrative Law 40 (Taggart, Michael ed., Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1997).Google Scholar
Bamforth, Nicholas & Leyland, Peter, Public Law in a Multi-Layered Constitution, in Public Law in a Multi-Layered Constitution 247 (Bamforth, Nicholas & Leyland, Peter eds., Oxford & Portland, Oregon: Hart, 2003).Google Scholar
Brooks, Richard R. W., Knowledge in Fiduciary Relations, in Philosophical Foundations of Fiduciary Law 225 (Gold, Andrew S. & Miller, Paul B. eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Chester, Burke-White, William & von Staden, Andreas; Asteriti, Alessandra & Tams, Christian J.; and Marboe, Irmgard, all in The Multilateralization of International Investment Law (Schill, Stephan W., ed., Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
della Cananea, Giacinto, Procedural Due Process of Law Beyond the State, in The Exercise of Public Authority by International Institutions 965 (von Bogdandy, Armin, Wolfrum, Rüdiger, von Bernstorff, Jochen, Dann, Philipp & Goldmann, Matthias eds., Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cane, Peter, Accountability and the Public/Private Distinction, in Public Law in a Multi-Layered Constitution 247 (Bamforth, Nicholas & Leyland, Peter eds., Oxford & Portland, Oregon: Hart, 2003).Google Scholar
Cane, P., Theory and Values in Public Law, in Law and Administration in Europe: Essays in Honour of Carol Harlow 15 (Craig, Paul & Rawlings, Richard eds., Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Cherednychenko, Olha O., Subordinating Contract Law to Fundamental Rights: Towards a Major Breakthrough or Towards Walking in Circles?, in Constitutional Values and European Contract Law 35 (Grundmann, Stefan ed., Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International, 2008).Google Scholar
Dagan, Hanoch & Hannes, Sharon, Managing Our Money: The Law of Financial Fiduciaries as a Private Law Institution, in Philosophical Foundations of Fiduciary Law 91 (Gold, Andrew S. & Miller, Paul B. eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Dennis M., Socio-Economic Rights, in The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law 1020 (Rosenfeld, Michel & Sajó, András eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, Unification Rather than Fragmentation of International Law? The Case of International Investment Law and Human Rights Law, in Human Rights in International Investment Law and Arbitration 45 (Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, Francioni, Francesco & Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich eds., Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dürig, Günter, Grundrechte und Zivilrechtsprechung, in Vom Bonner Grundgesetz zur gesamtdeutschen Verfassung. Festschrift zum 75. Geburtstag von Hans Nawiasky 177–82 (Maunz, Theodor ed., Munich: Isar Verlag, 1956) (Ger.).Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, Political Judges and the Rule of Law, in A Matter of Principle, ch. I (Cambridge, Mass & London, England: Harvard University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Ewing, Keith D., Economic Rights, in Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law 1036 (Rosenfeld, Michel & Sajó, András eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Feinäugle, Clemens A., The UN Security Council Al-Qaida and Taliban Sanctions Committee, in The Exercise of Public Authority by International Institutions 101 (von Bogdandy, Armin, Wolfrum, Rüdiger, von Bernstorff, Jochen, Dann, Philipp & Goldmann, Matthias eds., Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrari, Franco, Forum Shopping in the International Arbitration Context: Setting the Stage, in Franco Ferrari, Forum Shopping in the International Commercial Arbitration Context 1 (Munich: Sellier European Law Publishers, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finn, Paul, The Forgotten ‘Trust’: The People and the State, in Equity: Issues and Trends 131 (Cope, Malcolm ed., Leichhardt, NSW: Federation Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Fox-Decent, Evan, Fiduciary Authority and the Service Conception, in Philosophical Foundations of Fiduciary Law 363 (Gold, Andrew S. & Miller, Paul B. eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox-Decent, Evan, From Fiduciary States to Joint Trusteeship of the Atmosphere: The Right to a Healthy Environment through a Fiduciary Prism, in Fiduciary Duty and the Atmospheric Trust 253 (Coghill, Ken, Sampford, Charles & Smith, Tim eds., Surrey & Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2012).Google Scholar
Freedland, Mark, Law, Public Services, and Citizenship—New Domains, New Regimes?, in Public Service and Citizenship in European Law—Public and Labour Law Perspectives E11 (Freedland, Mark & Sciarra, Silvana eds., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Gold, Andrew S., The Loyalties of Fiduciary Law, in Philosophical Foundations of Fiduciary Law 176 (Gold, Andrew S. & Miller, Paul B. eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldmann, Matthias, Inside Relative Normativity: From Sources to Standard Instruments for the Exercise of International Public Authority, in The Exercise of Public Authority by International Institutions 661 (von Bogdandy, Armin, Wolfrum, Rüdiger, von Bernstorff, Jochen, Dann, Philipp & Goldmann, Matthias eds., Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutmann, Amy, Freedom of Association, in Freedom of Association 3 (Gutmann, Amy ed., Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Hershkoff, Helen, in this volume.
Hershkoff, Helen, State Common Law and the Dual Enforcement of Constitutional Norms, in New Frontiers of State Constitutional Law: Dual Enforcement of Norms 151 (Gardner, James A. and Rossi, Jim eds., New York: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Hershkoff, Helen, Transforming Legal Theory in the Light of Practice: The Judicial Application of Social and Economic Rights to Private Orderings, in Courting Social Justice: Judicial Enforcement of Social and Economic Rights in the Developing World 268 (Gauri, Varun & Brinks, Daniel M. eds., New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, Moshe, Investment Tribunals and Human Rights Treaties: A Sociological Perspective, in Investment Law within International Law: Integrationist Perspectives 85 (Baetens, Freya ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, Moshe, Investment Tribunals and Human Rights: Divergent Paths, in Human Rights in International Investment Law and Arbitration 97 (Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, Francioni, Francesco & Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich eds., 2009).
Hirsch, Moshe, Interactions between Investment and Non-Investment Obligations, in The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law 154 (Muchlinski, Peter, Ortino, Federico & Schreuer, Christoph eds., Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Holmes, Stephen & Sunstein, Cass R., The Politics of Constitutional Revision in Eastern Europe, in Responding to Imperfection: The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment 275 (Levinson, Sanford, ed., Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Howard, Rhoda, Dignity, Community and Human Rights, in Human Rights in Cross-Cultural Perspectives: A Quest for Consensus 81 (Ahmed An-Na’im, Abdullahi ed., Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Hunt, Murray., Constitutionalism and Contractualisation of Government in the United Kingdom, in The Province of Administrative Law (Taggart, Michael ed., Oxford, UK: Hart Publishing, 1997).Google Scholar
Jackson, Vicki C. Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments: A Window into Constitutional Theory and Transnational Constitutionalism, in Democracy perspectives: Festschrift for Brun-Otto Bryde’s 70th Birthday (Bäuerle, Michael, Dann, Philipp & Rabenstein, Astrid Wall eds., Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2013).Google Scholar
Jenson, Jane & Levi, Ron, Narratives and Regimes of Social and Human Rights: The Jack Pines of the Neoliberal Era, in Social Resilience in the Neoliberal Era 69 (Hall, Peter A. & Lamont, Michèle eds., New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kateb, George, The Value of Associations, in Freedom of Association 35 (Gutmann, Amy ed., Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Kingsbury, Benedict, International Law as Inter-Public Law, in Nomos XLIX: Moral Universalism and Pluralism 167 (Richardson, Henry R. & Williams, Melissa S. eds., New York: New York University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Kingsbury, Benedict & Donaldson, Megan, From Bilateralism to Publicness in International Law, in From Bilateralism to Community Interest: Essays in Honour of Bruno Simma 79 (Fastenrath, Ulrich, Geiger, Rudolf, Khan, Daniel-Erasmus, Paulus, Andreas, von Schorlemer, Sabine & Vedder, Christoph eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingsbury, Benedict & Schill, Stephan, Investor-State Arbitration as Governance: Fair and Equitable Treatment, Proportionality, and the Emerging Global Administrative Law, in El Nuevo Derecho Administrative Global En América Latina: Desafíos Par Alas Inversions Extrajeras, La Regulación Nacional Y El Financiamiento Para El Desarrollo 221 (Buenos Aires: RPA, 2009).Google Scholar
Klabbers, Jan, Beyond the Vienna Convention: Conflicting Treaty Provisions, in The Law of Treaties beyond the Vienna Convention (Cannizazaro, Enzo ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Klabbers, Jan, Grundnormen, Reluctant: Articles 31(3)(C) and 42 of the Vienna Convention on the Laws of Treaties and the Fragmentation of International Law, in Time, History and International Law 141 (Craven, Matthew, Fitzmaurice, Malgosia & Vogiatzi, Maria eds., Leiden & Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2007).Google Scholar
Koremenos, Barbara & Betz, Timm, The Design of Dispute Settlement Procedures in International Agreements, in Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations 371 (Dunoff, Jeffrey L. & Pollack, Mark A. eds., New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Kriebaum, Ursula, Privatizing Human Rights: The Interface between International Investment Protection and Human Rights, in The Law of International Relations—Liber Amicorum Hanspeter Neuhold 165 (Reinsch, August & Kriebaum, Ursula eds., Ultrecht, Netherlands: Eleven International Pub, 2007).Google Scholar
Kumm, Mattias, Political Liberalism and the Structures of Rights: On the Place and Limits of the Proportionality Requirement, in Law, Rights and Discourse: Themes from the Legal Philosophy of Robert Alexy 7 (Pavlakos, George ed., Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing, 2006).Google Scholar
Kurtz, Jürgen, The Merits and Limits of Comparativism: National Treatment in International Investment Law and the WTO, in The Multilateralization of International Investment Law 243 (Schill, Stephan W., ed., Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Langford, Malcolm, The Justiciability of Social Rights: From Practice to Theory, in Social Rights Jurisprudence: Emerging Trends in International and Comparative Law 3 (Langford, Malcolm ed., Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, John, Second Treatise, in Two Treatises of Government, 265 (Laslett, Peter ed., Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucy, William, Private and Public: Some Banalities about a Platitude, in After Public Law 56 (Mac Amhlaigh, Cormac, Michelon, Claudio & Walker, Neil eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Lutz, Donald S., Toward a Theory of Constitutional Amendment, in Responding to Imperfection: The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment 237 (Levinson, Sanford, ed., Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Metzger, Gillian E., Private Delegations, Due Process, and the Duty to Supervise, in Government by Contract: Outsourcing and American Democracy 291 (Freeman, Jody & Minow, Martha eds., Cambridge, Mass. & London, England: Harvard University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Michelman, Frank I., The Interplay of Constitutional and Ordinary Jurisdiction, in Comparative Constitutional Law 278 (Ginsburg, Tom & Dixon, Rosalind eds., Cheltenham, UK & Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2011).Google Scholar
Miller, Paul B., The Fiduciary Relationship, in Philosophical Foundations of Fiduciary Law 63 (Gold, Andrew S. & Miller, Paul B. eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew, Liberal Theories of International Law, in Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations 83 (Dunoff, Jeffrey L. & Pollack, Mark A. eds., New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Morijn, John & Krommendijk, Jasper, “Proportional” by What Measure(s)? Balancing Investor Interests and Human Rights by Way of Applying the Proportionality Principle in Investor-State Arbitration, in Human Rights in International Investment Law and Arbitration 422 (Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, Francioni, Francesco & Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich eds., Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Oliver, Dawn, The Underlying Values of Public and Private Law, in The Province of Administrative Law 217 (Taggart, Michael ed., Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1997).Google Scholar
Osiatynski, Wictor, Social and Economic Rights in a New Constitution for Poland, in Western Rights? Post-Communist Application 233 (Sajó, András ed., The Hague, The Netherlands & Cambridge, MA: Kluwer Law International, 1996)Google Scholar
Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich, Multilevel Trade Governance in the WTO Requires Multilevel Constitutionalism, in Constitutionalism, Multilevel Trade Governance and Social Regulation 5 (Joerges, Christian & Petersmann, Ernst-Ultrich eds., Oxford & Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing, 2006).Google Scholar
Raustiala, Kal, International Proliferation and the International Legal Order, in Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations 293 (Dunoff, Jeffrey L. & Pollack, Mark A. eds., New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph, Human Rights without Foundations, in The Philosophy of International Law 321 (Besson, Samantha & Tasioulas, John eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph, On the Authority and Interpretation of Constitutions: Some Preliminaries, in Constitutionalism: Philosophical Foundations 152 (Alexander, Larry ed., Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Reiner, Clara & Schreuer, Christoph, Human Rights and International Investment Arbitration, in Human Rights in International Investment Law and Arbitration 82 (Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, Francioni, Francesco & Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich eds., Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Schill, Stephan, International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law—An Introduction, in The Multilateralization of International Investment Law 3 (Schill, Stephan W., ed., Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneiderman, David, in this volume.
Scheinin, Martin, Impact on the Law of Treaties, in The Impact of Human Rights Law on General International Law 23 (Scheinin, Martin & Kamminga, Menno T. eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Lionel D., Can We Be Obliged to Be Selfless?, in Philosophical Foundations of Fiduciary Law 141 (Gold, Andrew S. & Miller, Paul B. eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, Hillel, Working Rights, in A Debate over Rights: Philosophical Enquiries, Kramer, Mathew H., Simmonds, Nigel E. & Steiner, Hillel eds. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass, Against Positive Rights, in Western Rights? Post-Communist Application 225 (Sajó, András ed., The Hague, The Netherlands & Cambridge, MA: Kluwer Law International,1996).Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther, A Constitutional Moment? The Logics of “Hit the Bottom,” in The Financial Crisis in Constitutional Perspective: The Dark Side of Functional Differentiation 3 (Kjaer, Poul & Teubner, Gunther eds., Oxford & Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing, 2011).Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther, “Global Bukowina”: Legal Pluralism in the World Society, in Global Law without a State (Teubner, Gunther ed., Aldershot, Dartmouth: Ashgate Publishing Company, 1996).Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther, Societal Constitutionalism: Alternatives to State-Centered Constitutional Theory?, in Transnational Governance and Constitutionalism 3 (Joerges, Christian, Sand, Inger-Johanne & Teuber, Gunther eds., Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing, 2004).Google Scholar
von Bogdandy, Armin, Dann, Philipp & Goldmann, Matthias, Developing the Publicness of Public International Law: Towards a Legal Framework for Global Governance Activities, in The Exercise of Public Authority by International Institutions 4 (von Bogdandy, Armin, Wolfrum, Rüdiger, von Bernstorff, Jochen, Dann, Philipp & Goldmann, Matthias eds., Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waibel, Michael Kaushal, Asha, Chung, Kyo-Hwa Liz & Balchin, Claire, The Backlash against Investment Arbitration: Perceptions and Reality, in The Backlash against Investment Arbitration: Perceptions and Reality xxxvii (Weibel, Michael, Kaushal, Asha, Chung, Kyo-Hwa Liz & Balchin, Claire eds., Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International, 2010).Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy, Property and Ownership, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Zalta, Edward N ed., Standford, CA: Standford University 2012).Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy, Rights in Conflict, in Liberal Rights: Collected Papers 1981–1991 203 (Cambridge & New York & Victoria: Cambridge University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Weinrib, Lorraine, Constitutional Conceptions and Constitutional Comparativism, in Defining the Field of Comparative Constitutional Law 3 (Jackson, Vicki & Tushnet, Mark eds., Westport, Connecticut: Praeger Publishers, 2002).Google Scholar
Williams, Alexander, Public Authorities, in The Impact of the UK Human Rights Act on Private Law 48 (Hoffman, David ed., New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, John, What Washington Means by Policy Reform, in Latin American Adjustment: How Much Has Happened (Williamson, John ed., Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics, 1990).Google Scholar
Young, Alison L., Mapping Horizontal Effect, in The Impact of the UK Human Rights Act on Private Law 16 (Hoffman, David ed., New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Matthew D., Rights against Rules; The Moral Structure of American Constitutional Law, 97 Mich. L. Rev. 1 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akehurst, Michael, Equity and General Principles of Law, 25 Int’l & Comp. L. Q. 801 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aleinikoff, Thomas Alexander, Constitutional Law in the Age of Balancing, 96 Yale L.J. 943 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Larry, The Public/Private Distinction and Constitutional Limits on Private Power, 10 Const. Comment. 361 (1993).Google Scholar
Alexy, Robert, The Construction of Constitutional Rights, 4 Law & Ethics Hum. Rts. 20 (2010).Google Scholar
Allen, Tom, Compensation for Property under the European Convention on Human Rights, 28 Mich. J. Int’l Law 287 (2007).Google Scholar
Allen, Tom, Liberalism, Social Democracy and the Value of Property under the European Convention on Human Rights, 59 Int’l & Comp. L.Q. 1055 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, José E., Are Corporations “Subjects” of International Law?, 9 Santa Clara J. Int’l L. 1 (2011).Google Scholar
Alvarez, José E., How Not to Link: Institutional Conundrums of an Expanded Trade Regime, 7 Widener L. Symp. J. 1 (2001).Google ScholarPubMed
Alvarez, José E., International Organizations: Accountability or Responsibility, in Responsibility of Individuals, States and Organizations: Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Canadian Council on International Law, Ottawa, October 26–28, 2006,121 (Canadian Council on International Law, 2007).
Alvarez, José E., The Paradoxical Argentina Crisis Cases, 6 World Arb. & Mediation Rev. 143 (2010).Google Scholar
Alvarez, José E., The Return of the State, 20 Minn. J. Int’l L. 223 (2011).Google Scholar
Alvarez, José E. & Brink, Tegan, Revisiting the Necessity Defense: Continental Casualty v. Argentina, 2010–11 Y.B. on Int’l Investment L. & Pol’y 319 (2011).
Alvarez, José E. & Khamsi, Kathryn, The Argentine Crisis and Foreign Investors: A Glimpse into the Heart of the Investment Regime, 2008–09 Y.B. on Int’l Investment L. & Pol’y 379 (2009).
Alvarez-Jiménez, Alberto, The Interpretation of Necessity Clauses in Bilateral Investment Treaties after the Recent ICSDI Annulment Decisions, 2010–11 Y.B. on Int’l Investment L. & Pol’y 419 (2011).
Ancelovici, Marcos & Jenson, Jane, La standardisation et les mécanismes du transfert transnational, 1 Rev. Gouv’t Action Pub. 37 (2012) (Fr.).Google Scholar
Atkinson, Rob, Obedience as the Foundation of Fiduciary Duty, 34 J. Corp. L. 45 (2008).Google Scholar
Bandes, Susan A., The Negative Constitution: A Critique, 88 Mich. L. Rev. 8 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandura, Romina, A Survey of Composite Indices Measuring Country Performance: 2006 Update, (U.N.D.P/O.D.S. Working Background Paper, 2006).
Barak-Erez, Daphne, The Private Prison Controversy and the Privatisation Continuum, 5 L. & Ethics of Hum. Rts. 138 (2011).Google Scholar
Barak-Erez, Daphne, A State Action Doctrine for an Age of Privatization, 45 Syracuse L. Rev. 1169 (1995).Google Scholar
Barsh, Russel Lawrence, Measuring Human Rights: Problems of Methodology and Purpose, 15 Hum. Rts. Q. 87 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartholomew, Amy & Breakspear, Jennifer, Human Rights as Swords of Empire?, 40 Socialist Reg. 125 (2009).Google Scholar
Baxi, Upendra, Voices of Suffering and the Future of Human Rights (1998) 8 Transnat’l L. & Contemp. Probs. 125.Google Scholar
Beale, L.K., Charter Schools, Common Schools and the Washington State Constitution, 72 Wash. L. Rev. 535 (1997).Google Scholar
Beermann, Jack M., Administrative-Law-Like Obligations on Private[ized] Entities, 49 UCLA L. Rev. 1717 (2002).Google Scholar
Beermann, Jack M., Privatization and Political Accountability, 28 Fordham Urb. L.J. 1507 (2001).Google Scholar
Benvenisti, Eyal & Downs, George W., The Empire’s New Clothes: Political Economy and the Fragmentation of International Law, 60 Stanford L. Rev. 595 (2007).Google Scholar
Berle, Adolf A. Jr., Constitutional Limitations on Corporate Activity—Protection of Personal Rights from Invasion through Economic Power, 100 U. Pa. L. Rev. 933 (1952).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bermann, George, Taking Subsidiarity Seriously: Federalism in the European Community and the United States, 94 Colum. L. Rev. 331 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernal, Carlos, Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments in the Case Study of Colombia: An Analysis of the Justification and Meaning of the Constitutional Replacement Doctrine, 11 I.CON 339 (2013).Google Scholar
BeVier, Lillian & Harrison, John, The State Action Principle and Its Critics, 96 Va. L. Rev. 1767 (2010).Google Scholar
Blank, Yishai, Federalism, Subsidiarity, and the Role of Local Governments in an Age of Global Multilevel Governance, 37 Fordham Urb. L.J. 509 (2010).Google Scholar
Branch, H. N. & Rowe, Leo Stanton, The Mexican Constitution of 1917 compared with the Constitution of 1857, 71 Annals Am. Pol. Sci. Ass’n 1, 2 (Supp. May 1917) (translating both constitutions).Google Scholar
Brower, Charles H. II, NAFTA’s Investment Chapter: Initial Thoughts about Second-Generation Rights 36 Vand. J. Transnat’l L. 1533 (2003).Google Scholar
Buchanan, G. Sidney, A Conceptual History of the State Action Doctrine: The Search for Governmental Responsibility, 34 Hous. L. Rev. 333 (1997).Google Scholar
Carozza, Paolo G., Subsidiarity as a Structural Principle of International Human Rights Law, 97 Am. J. Int’l L. 38 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chemerinsky, Erwin, The Assumptions of Federalism, 58 Stan. L. Rev. 1763 (2006).Google Scholar
Chemerinsky, Erwin, Reconceptualizing Federalism, 50 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 729 (2006).Google Scholar
Chemerinsky, Erwin, Rethinking State Action, 80 Nw. U. L. Rev. 503 (1985).Google Scholar
Chemerinsky, Erwin, Empowering States When It Matters, 69 Brook. L. Rev. 1313 (2004).Google Scholar
Chemerinsky, Erwin, The Values of Federalism, 47 Fla. L. Rev. 499 (1995).Google Scholar
Cherednychenko, Olha O., Fundamental Rights and Private Law: A Relationship of Subordination or Complementarity?, 3 Utrecht L. Rev. 1 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chmielewski, Philip J., Workers’ Participation in the United States: Catholic Social Teaching and Democratic Theory, 55 Rev. Soc. Econ. 487 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen-Eliya, Moshe & Porat, Iddo, The Hidden Foreign Law Debate in Heller: The Proportionality Approach in American Constitutional Law, 16 San Diego L. Rev. 367 (2009).Google Scholar
Collins, Hugh, Ascription of Legal Responsibility to Groups in Complex Patterns of Economic Integration, 53 Mod. L. Rev. 731 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, Paul, Contracting Out, the Human Rights Act and the Scope of Judicial Review, 118 L. Q. Rev. 551 (2002).Google Scholar
Criddle, Evan J., Fiduciary Administration: Rethinking Popular Representation in Agency Rulemaking, 88 Tex. L. Rev. 441 (2010).Google Scholar
Criddle, Evan J., Fiduciary Foundations of Administrative Law, 54 UCLA L. Rev. 117 (2006).Google Scholar
Criddle, Evan J. & Fox-Decent, Evan, Human Rights, Emergencies, and the Rule of Law, 34 Hum. Rts. Q. 39 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwall, Stephen & Darwall, Julian, Civil Recourse as Mutual Accountability, 39 Fla. St. U. L. R. 17 (2011).Google Scholar
Davies, Anne C.L., This Time It’s for Real: The Health and Social Care Act 2012, 76 Mod. L. Rev. 564 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Anne C.L., Ultra Vires problems in Government Contracts, 122 L.Q. Rev. 98 (2006).Google Scholar
Davis, Kevin, Kingsbury, Benedict & Merry, Sally Engle, Indicators as a Technology of Global Governance (Global Admin. L. Series, Inst. for Int’l L. & Just., Working Paper 2010/2, 2010).
DeMott, Deborah A., Beyond Metaphor: An Analysis of Fiduciary Obligation, 1988 Duke L.J 879 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dersnah, Megan, Background Paper, A Review of National MDG Reports from a Gender Perspective, U.N. Women, Expert Grp. Meeting, Oct. 21–24, 2013.
Dezalay, Yves & Bryant Garth, From the Cold War to Kosovo: The Rise and Renewal of the Field of International Human Rights, 2 Ann. Rev. L. Soc. Sci. 231 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, Laura A., Public Law Values in a Privatized World, 31 Yale J. Int’l L. 383 (2006).Google Scholar
Donnelly, Catherine, Positive Obligations and Privatisation, 61 N. Ir. Legal Q. 209 (2010).Google Scholar
Donnelly, Catherine M. & Cheshire, Leonard, Again and Beyond: Private Contractors, Contract and s 6(3)(b) of the Human Rights Act, 2005 Pub. L. 785.
Dumberry, Patrick & Dumas-Aubin, Gabrielle, How to Impose Human Rights Obligations on Corporations, 4 Y.B. on Int’l Investment L. & Pol’y 569 (2011–12).Google Scholar
Eberle, Edward J., The Architecture of First Amendment Free Speech, Mich. St. L. Rev. 1191 (2011).
Edwards, Denis J., Fearing Federalism’s Failure: Subsidiarity in the European Union, 44 Am. J. Comp. L. 537 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Hage, Javier, How May Tribunals Apply the Customary Necessity Rule to the Argentine Cases?, 2011–12 Y.B. on Int’l Investment L. & Pol’y 445 (2012).Google Scholar
Emberland, Marius, The Corporate Veil in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights, 63 ZaöRV 945 (2003).Google Scholar
Fallon, Richard, Legitimacy and the Constitution, 118 Harv. L. Rev. 1787 (2005).Google Scholar
Ferraz, Octavio Luiz Motta, Harming the Poor through Social Rights Litigation: Lessons From Brazil, 89 Tex. L. Rev. 1643 (2011).Google Scholar
Ferraz, Octavio Luiz Motta, Social and Economic Rights: Harming the Poor through Social Rights Litigation: Lessons from Brazil, 59 Tex. L. Rev. 1643 (2011).Google Scholar
Finn, Paul, Fiduciary Reflections, 88 Austl. L.J. 127 (2014).Google Scholar
Fischer, Thomas C., “Federalism” in the European Community and the United States: A Rose by Any Other Name … , 17 Fordham Int’l L.J. 389 (1994).Google Scholar
Fisher-Lescano, Andrea & Teubner, Gunther, Regime Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law, 25 Mich. J. Int’l. Law 999, 1004 (2004).Google Scholar
Fleming, James E., The Missing Selves in Constitutional Self-Government, 71 Fordham L. Rev. 1789 (2003).Google Scholar
Fombad, Charles Manga, Some Perspectives on Durability and Change under Modern African Constitutions, 11 Int’l J. Const. L. (I•CON) 382 (2013).Google Scholar
Frankel, Richard, Regulating Privatized Government Through § 1983, 76 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1449 (2009).Google Scholar
Frankel, Tamar, Fiduciary Law, 71 Calif. L. Rev. 795 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedland, Mark, Privatising Carltona: Part II of the Deregulation and Contracting Out Act 1994, Pub. L. 21 (1995).
Freedland, Mark, Public Law and Private Finance: Placing the Private Finance Initiative in a Public Law Frame, Pub. L. 288 (1998).
Freeman, Jody, Extending Public Law Norms through Privatization, 116 Harv. L. Rev. 1285 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, Jody, The Private Role in Public Governance, 75 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 543 (2000).Google Scholar
Friedman, Barry, Dialogue and Judicial Review, 91 Mich. L. Rev. 577 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, W.G., Public and Private Law Thinking: The Need for Synthesis, 5 Wayne L. Rev. 291 (1958–59).Google Scholar
Friendly, Henry J., The Public-Private Penumbra—Fourteen Years Later, 130 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1289 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox-Decent, Evan & Criddle, Evan J., The Fiduciary Constitution of Human Rights, 15 Legal Theory 301 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, Paul, The Irish Constitution—Its Unique Nature and the Relevance of International Jurisprudence, 45 Irish Jurist 22 (2010).Google Scholar
Gardbaum, Stephen, The Horizontal Effect of Constitutional Rights, 102 Mich. L. Rev. 387 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geistfeld, Mark A., The Doctrinal Unity of Alternative Liability and Market-Share Liability, 155 U. Pa. L. Rev. 447 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giegerich, Thomas, The Is and the Ought of International Constitutionalism: How Far Have We Come on Habermans’s Road to a “Well-Considered Constitutionalization of International Law”?, 10 German L. J. 31 (2009).Google Scholar
Gilman, Michele Estrin, Legal Accountability in an Era of Privatized Welfare, 89 Cal. L. Rev. 569 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom & Melton, James, Does the Constitutional Amendment Rule Matter at All? Amendment Cultures and the Challenges of Measuring Amendment Difficulty (May 3, 2014), University of Chicago Coase-Sandor Institute for Law & Economics Research Paper No. 682, University of Chicago, Public Law Working Paper No. 472, available at SSRN: ssrn.com/abstract=2432520.
Glennon, Robert J. Jr. & Nowak, John E., A Functional Analysis of the Fourteenth Amendment “State Action” Requirement, 1976 Sup. Ct. Rev. 221 (1976).Google Scholar
Gold, Andrew S., Reflections on the State as Fiduciary, 63 U. of Toronto L.J. 655 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gore, Charles, The Rise and Fall of the Washington Consensus as a Paradigm for Developing Countries, 28 World Dev. 789 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gosling, Martin, The Global Trend towards Private Prisons, 170 Just. of the Peace & Loc. Gov’t L. 892 (2006).Google Scholar
Grant, Ruth W. & Keohane, Robert O., Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics, 99 Am. Pol. Sci. Rev. 29 (Feb. 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Leslie, Two Views of Collective Rights, 4 Can. J. Law Jurisprudence 315 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, Abner S., The Irreducible Constitution, 7 J. Contemp. Legal Issues 293 (1996).Google Scholar
Grey, Thomas C., Molecular Motions: The Holmesian Judge in Theory and Practice, 37 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 19 (1995).Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen, The Constitutionalization of International Law and the Legitimation Problems of a Constitution for a World Society, 15 Constellations 445 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, Alexander, The Federalist No. 70, No. 72 (J. Cooke ed., 1961).
Harlow, Carol, ‘Public’ and ‘Private’ Law: Definition without Distinction, 43 Mod. L. Rev. 241 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hershkoff, Helen, Foreword: Positive Rights and State Constitutions, 33 Rutgers L.J. 799 (2002).Google Scholar
Hershkoff, Helen, Horizontality and the “Spooky” Doctrines of American Law, 59 Buff. L. Rev. 455 (2011).Google Scholar
Hershkoff, Helen, “Just Words”: Common Law and the Enforcement of State Constitutional Social and Economic Rights, 62 Stan. L. Rev. 1521 (2010).Google Scholar
Hershkoff, Helen, Lecture, The Private Life of Public Rights: State Constitutions and the Common Law, 88 N.Y.U. L. Rev. Online 1 (2013).Google Scholar
Hershkoff, Helen, The New Jersey Constitution: Positive Rights, Common Law Entitlements, and State Action, 69 Alb. L. Rev. 553 (2006).Google Scholar
Hershkoff, Helen, Positive Rights and State Constitutions: The Limits of Federal Rationality Review, 112 Harv. L. Rev. 1131 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hershkoff, Helen, Welfare Devolution and State Constitutions, 67 Fordham L. Rev. 1403 (1999).Google Scholar
Hershkoff, Helen & Loffredo, Stephen, State Courts and Constitutional Socio-Economic Rights: Exploring the Underutilization Thesis, 115 Penn St. L. Rev. 923 (2011).Google Scholar
Higgins, Tracy E., Anti-Essentialism, Relativism, and Human Rights, 19 Harv. Women’s L.J. 89 (1996).Google Scholar
Hogan, Gerard, Directive Principles, Socio-Economic Rights and the Constitution, 36 Irish Jurist 174 (2001).Google Scholar
Hogg, Peter W. & Bushell, Allison A., The Charter Dialogue between Courts and Legislatures (Or Perhaps the Charter of Rights Isn’t Such a Bad Thing after All), 35 Osgoode Hall L.J. 75 (1997).Google Scholar
Hohfeld, Wesley Newcomb, Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied to Legal Reasoning, 23 Yale L.J. 16 (1913).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, Harold W., The Misleading Search for “State Action” under the Fourteenth Amendment, 30 S. Cal. L. Rev. 208 (1956–57).Google Scholar
Iacobucci, Frank, The Charter: 20 Years Later, 21 Windsor Y.B. Access to Just. 3 (2002).Google Scholar
Jackson, Vicki C., Being Proportional about Proportionality, 21 Const. Comment. 803 (2004).Google Scholar
Jacoby, Tamar, The Reagan Turnaround on Human Rights, 64 Foreign Aff. 1066 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jain, Neha, General Principles of Law as Gap-Fillers (forthcoming).
Jensen, Darryn, Prescription and Proscription in Fiduciary Obligations, 21 King’s L.J. 333 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Bruce & Youm, Kyu Ho, Commercial Speech and Free Expression: The United States and Europe Compared, 2 J. Int’l Media & Ent. L. 159 (2008).Google Scholar
Kabeer, Naila, Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment: A Critical Analysis of the Third Millennium Development Goal, 13 Gender & Dev. 13 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kadens, Emily, The Myth of Customary Law Merchant, 90 Tex. L. Rev. 1153 (2012).Google Scholar
Katz, Al, Studies in Boundary Theory: Three Essays in Adjudication and Politics, 28 Buff. L. Rev. 383 (1978).Google Scholar
Kaye, Judith S., Foreword: The Common Law and State Constitutional Law as Full Partners in the Protection of Individual Rights, 23 Rutgers L.J. 727 (1992).Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O., Moravcsik, Andrew & Slaughter, Anne-Marie, Legalized Dispute Resolution: Interstate and Transnational, 54 Int’l Org. 457 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Sung Hui, The Last Temptation of Congress: Legislator Insider Trading and the Fiduciary Norm against Corruption, 98 Cornell L. Rev. 845 (2013).Google Scholar
Kincaid, John, From Cooperative to Coercive Federalism, 509 Annals Am. Acad. Pol. & Soc. Sci. 139 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingsbury, Benedict & Stewart, Richard, The Emergence of Global Administrative Law, 68 Law & Contemp. Probs. 15 (2005).Google Scholar
Knop, Karen, Here and There: International Law in Domestic Courts, 32 NYU J. Int’l L. & Politics 501 (2000).Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, Constitutionalism as Mindset: Reflections on Kantian Themes about International Law and Globalization, 8 Theoretical Inquiries in L. 9, 17 (2006).Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, Fragmentation of International Law—The Function and Scope of the Lex Specialis Rule and the Question of “Self-Contained Regimes”: An Outline, 6(1) Transnat’l Disp. Mgmt (2009).Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, The Fate of Public International Law: Between Technique and Politics, 70 Mod. L. Rev. 1 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti & Leino, Päivi, Fragmentation of International Law? Postmodern Anxieties, 15 Leiden J. Int’ l L. 553 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, Larry & Sykes, Alan O., Municipal Liability Under § 1983: A Legal and Economic Analysis, 1987 Sup. Ct. Rev. 249 (1987).Google Scholar
Krent, Harold J., Power, Federal, Non-Federal Actors: The Ramifications of Free Enterprise Fund, 79 Fordham L. Rev. 2425 (2011).Google Scholar
Krent, Harold J., Reconceptualizing Sovereign Immunity, 45 Vand. L. Rev. 1529, 1529 (1992).Google Scholar
Kritchevsky, Barbara, Civil Rights Liability of Private Entities, 26 Cardozo L. Rev. 35 (2004).Google Scholar
Landau, David, The Reality of Social Rights Enforcement, 53 Harv. Int’l L.J. 402 (2012).Google Scholar
Law, David S., The Anatomy of a Conservative Court, 87 Tex L Rev. 1545 (2009).Google Scholar
Law, David S., Why Has Judicial Review Failed in Japan?, 88 Wash. U. L. Rev. 1425 (2011).Google Scholar
Law, David S. & Versteeg, Mila, The Evolution and Ideology of Global Constitutionalism, 99 Cal. L. Rev. 1163, 1170 (2011).Google Scholar
Leib, Ethan J. & Ponet, David L., Fiduciary Representation and Deliberative Engagement with Children, 20 J. Pol. Phil. 178 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Ralph, The Supreme Court as Republican Schoolmaster, 1967 Sup. Ct. Rev. 127.Google Scholar
Levinson, Daryl J., Making Government Pay: Markets, Politics, and the Allocation of Constitutional Costs, 67 U. Chi. L. Rev. 345 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loffredo, Stephen, Poverty, Inequality, and Class in the Structural Constitutional Law Course, 34 Fordham Urb. L.J. 1239 (2007).Google Scholar
Löwenheim, Oded, Examining the State: A Foucauldian Perspective on International ‘Governance Indicators’, 29 Third World Q. 255 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutz, Donald S., The United States Constitution as an Incomplete Text, 496 Annals Am. Acad. Pol. & Soc. Sci. 23 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, Bayless, Corporate Power and Individual Freedom: Some General Analysis and Particular Reservations, 55 Nw. U. L. Rev. 38 (1960).Google Scholar
Mashaw, Jerry L., Civil Liability of Government Officers: Property Rights and Official Accountability, 42 Law & Contemp. Probs. 8 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGovern, Shannon K., Note, A New Model for States as Laboratories for Reform: How Federalism Informs Education Policy, 86 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1519 (2011).Google Scholar
McLachlin, Campbell, Investment Treaties and General International Law, 57 Int’l & Comp. L.Q. 361, 369 (2008).Google Scholar
McLachlan, Campbell, The Principle of Systemic Integration and Article 31(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention, 54 Int’l & Comp. L.Q. 279 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medina, Barak, Constitutional Limits to Privatization: The Israeli Supreme Court Decision to Invalidate Prison Privatization, 8 Int’l J. Const. L. 690 (2010).Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle, Measuring the World: Indicators, Human Rights, and Global Governance, 103 Am. Soc’y of Int’l L. Proc. Ann. Meeting 239 (2009).Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle, Measuring the World: Indicators, Human Rights, and Global Governance, 52 Current Anthropology S83 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michelman, Frank I., On the Uses of Interpretive ‘Charity’: Some Notes on Application, Avoidance, Equality, and Objective Unconstitutionality from the 2007 Term of the Constitutional Court of South Africa, 1 Const. Ct. Rev. 1 (2008).Google Scholar
Michelman, Frank I., The Bill of Rights, The Common Law, and the Freedom-Friendly State, 58 U. Miami L. Rev. 401 (2003).Google Scholar
Michelman, Frank I., The Supreme Court and Litigation Access Fees: The Right to Protect One’s Rights—Part I 1973, Duke L.J. 1153 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michelman, Frank I., W(H)ither the Constitution?, 21 Cardozo L. Rev. 1063 (2000).Google Scholar
Miller, Paul B., Justifying Fiduciary Remedies, 63 U. Toronto L.J. 570 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Paul B., Multiple Loyalties and the Conflicted Fiduciary, 40 Queen’s L.J. 301 (2014).Google Scholar
Minow, Martha, Public and Private Partnerships: Accounting for the New Religion, 116 Harv. L. Rev. 1229 (2002–03).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mokhiber, Craig G., Toward a Measure of Dignity: Indicators for Rights-Based Development, 18 Stat. J. United Nations Econ. Commission Eur. 155 (2001).Google Scholar
Mortenson, Julian Davis, The Travaux of Travaux: Is the Vienna Convention Hostile to Drafting History, 107 Am. J. Int’l L. 780 (2013).Google Scholar
Moyn, Samuel, A Powerless Companion: Human Rights in the Age of Neoliberalism, 77 Law & Contemp. Probs. 147(2015).Google Scholar
Mullan, David, Underlying Constitutional Principles: The Legacy of Justice Rand, 34 Manitoba L.J. 1 (2010).Google Scholar
Mureinik, Etienne, A Bridge to Where? Introducing the Interim Bill of Rights, (1994) 10 S. Afr. J. on Hum. Rts. 31.Google Scholar
Nelson, Caleb, Sovereign Immunity as a Doctrine of Personal Jurisdiction, 115 Harv. L. Rev. 1559 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Neufville, Judith Innes, Social Indicators of Basic Needs: Quantitative Data for Human Rights Policy, 11 Soc. Indicators Res. 383 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, Onora, The Dark Side of Human Rights, 81 Int’l Aff. 427 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odomusu, Ibironke T., The Law and Politics of Engaging Resistance in Investment Dispute Settlement, 26 Penn St. Int’l L. Rev. 251 (2007).Google Scholar
Oliver, Dawn, Common Values in Public and Private Law and the Public/Private Divide, Pub. L. 630 (1997).
Palmer, Stephanie, Public Functions and Private Services: A Gap in Human Rights Protection, 6 Int’l J. Const. L. 585 (2008).Google Scholar
Paparinskis, Martins, Investment Treaty Arbitration and the (New) Law of State Responsibility, 24 Eur. J. Int’l. 617 (2013).Google Scholar
Perry, Michael J., The Morality of Human Rights, 50 San Diego L. Rev 775 (2013).Google Scholar
Perry, Stephen R., Protected Interests and Undertakings in the Law of Negligence, 42 U. Toronto L.J. 247 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, Anne, Compensatory Constitutionalism: The Function and Potential of Fundamental International Norms and Structures, 19 Leiden J. Int’l. L. 570 (2006).Google Scholar
Pildes, Richard H., Avoiding Balancing: The Role of Exclusionary Reasons in Constitutional Law, 45 Hastings L J. 711 (1994).Google Scholar
Ponet, David L. & Leib, Ethan J., Fiduciary Law’s Lessons for Deliberative Democracy, 91 B.U. L. Rev. 1207 (2011).Google Scholar
Posit, Dorrit & Casale, Daniela, Expert Paper, Gender, Education and Labour Market Outcomes, U.N. Women, Expert Grp. Meeting, Nov. 3–5, 2014.
Poto, Margherita, The Principle of Proportionality in Comparative Perspective, 8 German L.J. 835 (2007).Google Scholar
Quinn, Thomas G., State Action: A Pathology and a Proposed Cure, 64 Cal. L. Rev. 146 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratliff, Warren L., The Due Process Failure of America’s Prison Privatization Statutes, 21 Seton Hall Legis. J. 371 (1997).Google Scholar
Randall, Maya Hertig, Commercial Speech under the European Convention on Human Rights: Subordinate or Equal?, 6 Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 53 (2006).Google Scholar
Rave, D. Theodore, Politicians as Fiduciaries, 126 Harv. L. Rev. 671 (2013).Google Scholar
Redish, Martin H. & Marshall, Lawrence C., Adjudicatory Independence and the Values of Procedural Due Process, 95 Yale L. J. 455 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Anthea, Clash of Paradigms: Actors and Analogies Shaping the Investment Treaty System, 107 Am. J. Int’l L. 45 (2013).Google Scholar
Rodriguez, Daniel B., State Constitutional Failure, 2011 U. Ill. L. Rev. 1243 (2011).Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Garavito, César, Beyond the Courtroom: The Impact of Judicial Activism on Socioeconomic Rights in Latin America, 89 Tex. L. Rev. 1669 (2011)Google Scholar
Rodrik, Dani, Goodbye Washington Consensus, Hello Washington Confusion?, XLIV J Econ. Literature 973 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roosevelt, Franklin D., “Unless There is Security Here at Home, There Cannot Be Lasting Peace in the World”—Message to the Congress on the State of the Union, 13 Pub. Papers 32, 41 (Jan. 11, 1944).Google Scholar
Rosatti, Horacio Daniel, Los tratados bilaterales de inversión, el arbitraje internacional obligatorio y el sistema constitucional argentine, No. 198 La Ley 198 (Oct. 15, 2003).Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Lawrence, A Theory of Governmental Damages Liability: Torts, Constitutional Torts, and Takings, 9 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 797 (2007).Google Scholar
Rosga, AnnJannette & Satterthwaite, Margaret L., The Trust in Indicators: Measuring Human Rights 2 (Ctr. for Hum. Rts. & Global Just. Working paper, Number 20).
Ross, Howard, UN Body Criticizes Development Aid: Report Urges Wealthy Countries to Divert Spending to Basic Needs, The Globe and Mail, May 21, 1991.
Rostow, Eugene V., The Democratic Character of Judicial Review, 66 Harv. L. Rev. 193 (1952).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rostron, Allen, Beyond Market Share Liability: A Theory of Proportional Share Liability for Non-Fungible Products, 52 UCLA L. Rev. 151 (2004).Google Scholar
Rozakis, C., The Right to a Fair Trial in Civil Cases, 4 Jud. Stud. Inst. J. 96 (2004).Google Scholar
Rubenstein, W.B., The Concept of Equality in Civil Procedure (UCLA Research Paper Series, Research Paper No. 01–18).
Salmon, J., A Perspective on the Corporate Transformation of Healthcare, 25 Int’l J. Health Services 11 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarfaty, Galit A., Why Culture Matters in International Institutions: The Marginality of Human Rights at the World Bank, 103 Am. J. Int’l L. 647 (2009).Google Scholar
Schauer, Frederick, Ashwander Revisited, 1995 Sup. Ct. Rev. 71 (1995).Google Scholar
Schneiderman, David, The Global Regime of Investor Rights: Return to the Standards of Civilised Justice? 5 Transnat’l Legal Theory 60 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneiderman, David, Legitimacy and Reflexivity in International Investment Arbitration: A New Self-Restraint?, 2 Int’l J. Disp. Mgmt. 47 (2011).Google Scholar
Schneiderman, David, Revisiting the Depoliticization of Investment Disputes, 2010–11 Y.B. on Int’l Investment L. & Pol’y 693 (2012).Google Scholar
Schreuer, Christoph, From ICSID Annulment to Appeal Half Way Down the Slippery Slope, 10 L. & Prac. of Int’l Cts. & Tribunals 211 (2011).Google Scholar
Scolnicov, Anat., Lifeless and Lifelike in Law: Do Corporations Have Human Rights?, available at dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2268537.
Seidman, Louis Michael, The State Action Paradox, 10 Const. Comment. 379 (1993).Google Scholar
Simma, Bruno, From Bilateralism to Community Interest in International Law, 250 Recueil des Cours, Acad. de Droit Int’l de la Haye 217 (1997).Google Scholar
Simma, Bruno, Foreign Investment Arbitration: A Place for Human Rights, 60 Int’l & Comp. L.Q. 573 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simma, Bruno, Self-Contained Regimes, 15 Neth. Y.B. Int’l Law 111 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, Joseph W., The Legal Rights Debate in Analytical Jurisprudence from Bentham to Hohfeld, 1982 Wis. L. Rev. 975(1982).Google Scholar
Sklansky, David A., Private Policing and Human Rights, 5 L. & Ethics of Hum. Rts. (2011).Google Scholar
Sloane, Robert D., On the Use and Abuse of Necessity in the Law of State Responsibility, 106 Am. J. Int’l L. 447 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, Barbara Rook, Private Motivation, State Action and the Allocation of Responsibility for Fourteenth Amendment Violations, 75 Cornell L. Rev. 1052 (1990).Google Scholar
Spector, Horacio, Constitutional Transplants and the Mutation Effect, 83 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 129 (2008).Google Scholar
Sripati, Vijayashri & Thiruvengedam, Arun K., India: Constitutional Amendment Making the Right to Education a Fundamental Right, 2 Int’l. J of Const. L. 148 (2004).Google Scholar
Stewart, Richard B., Remedying Disregard in Global Regulatory Governance: Participation and Responsiveness, 108 Am. J. Int’l L. 211 (2014).Google Scholar
Strine, Leo, Hamermesh, Lawrence, Balotti, R. Franklin & Gorris, Jeffrey M., Loyalty’s Core Demand: The Defining Role of Good Faith in Corporation Law, 93 Geo. L.J. 629 (2010).Google Scholar
Supiot, Alain, État social et mondialisation: analyse juridique des solidarités, 2012–2013 Year 113 (113e année) Annuarie C. France 717 (2014).Google Scholar
Supiot, Alain, Le rêve de l’harmonie par le calcul, Le Monde Diplomatique, Feb. 2015 (Fr.).
Sweet, Alex Stone, Investor-State Arbitration: Proportionality’s New Frontier, 4 L. & Ethics of Hum. Rts. 47 (2010).Google Scholar
Sweet, Alec Stone & della Cananea, Giacinto, Proportionality, General Principles of Law, and Investor-State Arbitration: A Response to Jose Alvarez, 46 (3) N.Y.U. J. Int’l L. & Pol. 911, 940 (2014)Google Scholar
Sweet, Alec Stone & Mathews, Jud, Proportionality Balancing and Global Constitutionalism, 47 Colum. J. Transnat’l L. 72 (2008).Google Scholar
Sykes, Alan O., The Economics of Vicarious Liability, 93 Yale L.J. 1231 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Symposium, Charter Dialogue: Ten Years Later, 45 Osgoode Hall L.J. 1 (2007).
Symposium, The Proliferation of International Tribunals: Piercing together the Puzzle, 31 N.Y.U. J. Int’l L. & Pol. 679 (1999).
Tasioulas, John, Taking Rights out of Human Rights, 120 Ethics 647 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teubner, Gunther, The Anonymous Matrix: Human Rights Violations by ‘Private’ Transnational Actors, 69 Mod. L. Rev. 327 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teubner, Gunther, Constitutionalizing Polycontexturality, 20 Soc. & Legal Stud. 210 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teubner, Gunther, Legal Irritants: Good Faith in British Law or How Unifying Law Ends Up in New Divergences, 61 Mod. L. Rev. 11 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teubner, Gunther, Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modern Law, 17 Law & Soc’y Rev 239 (1982–83).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thirlway, Hugh, The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice, 61 (1) Y.B. Int’l L. 1, 113 (1990).Google Scholar
Tribe, Laurence H., A Constitution We are Amending: In Defense of a Restrained Judicial Role, 97 Harv. L. Rev. 433 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tribe, Laurence H., Unraveling National League of Cities: The New Federalism and Affirmative Rights to Essential Government Services, 90 Harv. L. Rev. 1065 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turano, Leslie., Charitable Trusts and the Public Service: The Public Accountability of Private Care Providers, 18 King’s L.J. 427 (2007).Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark, An Essay on Right, 62 Tex. L. Rev. 1363 (1984).Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark, Civil Rights and Social Rights: The Future of the Reconstruction Amendments, 25 Loyola L.A. L. Rev. 1207 (1992).Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark, A Response to David Landau, 53 Harv. Int’l L.J. Online 155 (2012).Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark, Shelley v. Kraemer and Theories of Equality, 33 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 383 (1988).Google Scholar
Unterhalter, Elaine, Expert Paper, The MDGs, Girls’ Education and Gender Equality, U.N. Women, Expert Grp. Meeting, Oct. 21–24, 2013.
Van Aaken, Anne, Fragmentation of International Law: The Case of International Investment Law, 17 Fin. Y.B. Int’l Inv. L. 91 (2006).Google Scholar
van der Walt, Johan, Horizontal Effect of Fundamental Rights and the Threshold of the Law in View of the Carmichele Saga, 19 S. Afr. J. Hum. Rts. 517 (2003).Google Scholar
van der Walt, Johan, Progressive Indirect Horizontal Effect of the Bill of Rights: Towards a Co-Operative Relation Between Common–Law and Constitutional Jurisprudence, 17 S. Afr. J. Hum. Rts. 341 (2001).Google Scholar
Velasco, Julian, How Many Fiduciary Duties Are There in Corporate Law, 83 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1231 (2010).Google Scholar
Verkuil, Paul R., Privatizing Due Process, 57 Admin. L. Rev. 963 (2005).Google Scholar
Verschraegen, Gert, Human Rights and Modern Society: A Sociological Analysis from the Perspective of Systems Theory, 29 J.L. & Soc’y 258 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vischer, Robert K., Subsidiarity as a Principle of Governance: Beyond Devolution, 35 Ind. L. Rev. 103 (2001).Google Scholar
Voeten, Erik, International Judicial Independence, (Sept. 2011) (unpublished manuscript).
von Borries, Reimer & Hauschild, Malte, Implementing the Subsidiarity Principle, 5 Colum. J. Eur. L. 369 (1999).Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy, Are Sovereigns Entitled to the Benefit of the International Rule of Law?, 22 Eur. J. Int’l. 315 (2011).Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy, The Concept and the Rule of Law, 43 Ga. L. Rev. 1 (2008).Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy, Property, Justification and Need, 6 Can. J. L. and Jurisprudence 185 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weil, Prosper, The Court Cannot Conclude Definitely … Non Liquet Revisited, 36 Colum. J. Transnat’l L. 109 (1997).Google Scholar
Wells, Michael L., Identifying State Actors in Constitutional Litigation: Reviving the Role of Substantive Context, 26 Cardozo L. Rev. 99 (2004).Google Scholar
Zipursky, Benjamin C., Snyder v. Phelps, Outrageousness, and the Open Texture of Tort Law, 60 DePaul L. Rev. 473 (2011).Google Scholar
Zumbansen, Peer, Transnational Private Regulatory Governance: Ambiguities of Public Authority and Private Power, 76 Law & Contemp. Probs. 117 (2013).Google Scholar