Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-cxxrm Total loading time: 0.604 Render date: 2021-11-27T21:24:54.260Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

10 - Implications of plant spatial distribution for pollination and seed production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 August 2009

Jaboury Ghazoul
Affiliation:
Imperial College London
David Burslem
Affiliation:
University of Aberdeen
Michelle Pinard
Affiliation:
University of Aberdeen
Sue Hartley
Affiliation:
University of Sussex
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The production of offspring has long been thought to be predominantly limited by the availability of resources rather than mating opportunities, a view based on ‘Bateman's principle’ espoused by Bateman in 1948. Applied to vascular plants, this principle predicts that fruit production is limited by maternal resources rather than pollen transfer. However, in the past 20 years limitation of seed production by pollination has been reported in numerous studies, and reviews suggest that more than 50% of plants studied show increased fruit production following experimental pollen supplementation (Burd 1994). Of course, short-term pollen supplementation studies fail to capture the lifetime success of the whole plant, leading some critics to maintain that lifetime reproductive output remains resource-limited. Nevertheless, population-wide declines in reproductive success, at least in the short term, owing to reduced pollen availability or ineffectual pollination have now been recorded among a range of plant species and geographic locations.

The cause of the declining efficiency in pollination has often been traced to changes in the spatial distribution of plants in the population, which in turn has affected the abundance of pollinators or led to changes in their foraging behaviour. Plant spatial distribution has become increasingly relevant following rapid changes in land use and landscape structure driven by anthropogenic activities. Logging and land clearance for agriculture and development has caused degradation of forest habitats either through the partial removal of economically important species, or by wholesale clearance and effective fragmentation and isolation of remnant forest patches.

Type
Chapter
Information
Biotic Interactions in the Tropics
Their Role in the Maintenance of Species Diversity
, pp. 241 - 266
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abe, T. (2001) Flowering phenology, display size, and fruit set in an understorey dioecious shrub, Aucuba japonica (Cornaceae). American Journal of Botany, 88, 455–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackerman, J. D., Mesler, M. R., Lu, K. L. & Montalvo, A. M. (1982) Food-foraging behavior of male Euglossini (Hymenoptera: Apidae): vagabonds or trapliners?Biotropica, 14, 241–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ågren, J. (1996) Population size, pollinator limitation, and seed set in the self-incompatible herb Lythrum salicaria. Ecology, 77, 1779–1790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aizen, M. A. (2001) Flower sex ratio, pollinator abundance, and the seasonal pollination dynamics of a protandrous plant. Ecology, 82, 127–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aizen, M. A. & Feinsinger, P. (1994a) Forest fragmentation, pollination and plant reproduction in a Chaco dry forest, Argentina. Ecology, 75, 330–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aizen, M. A. & Feinsinger, P. (1994b) Habitat fragmentation, native insect pollinators, and feral honey bees in Argentine ‘chaco serrano’. Ecological Applications, 4, 378–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alatalo, J. M. & Molau, U. (2001) Pollen viability and limitation of seed production in a population of the circumpolar cushion plant, Silene acaulis (Caryophyllaceae). Nordic Journal of Botany, 21, 365–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albre, J., Quilichini, A. & Gibernau, M. (2003) Pollination ecology of Arum italicum (Araceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 141, 205–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, P. R. & Hamrick, J. L. (1998) Reproductive dominance of pasture trees in a fragmented tropical forest. Science, 281, 103–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexandersson, R. & Agren, J. (1996) Population size, pollinator visitation and fruit production in the deceptive orchid Calypso bulbosa. Oecologia, 107, 533–540CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allison, T. D. (1990) Pollen production and plant density affect pollination and seed production in Taxus canadensis. Ecology, 71, 516–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bawa, K. S. (1974) Breeding systems of tree species of a lowland tropical community. Evolution, 28, 85–92CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bawa, K. S. (1990) Plant–pollinator interactions in tropical rain forests. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 21, 399–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bawa, K. S. & Beach, J. H. (1981) Evolution of sexual systems in flowering plants. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 68, 254–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bawa, K. S. & Webb, C. J. (1984) Flower, fruit and seed abortion in tropical trees: implications for the evolution of paternal and maternal reproductive patterns. American Journal of Botany, 71, 736–751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bawa, K. S., Bullock, S. H., Perry, D. R., Coville, R. E. & Grayum, M. H. (1985) Reproductive biology of tropical lowland rain forest trees. II. Pollination systems. American Journal of Botany, 72, 346–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bierzychudek, P. (1981) Pollinator limitation of plant reproductive effort. American Naturalist, 117, 838–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosch, M. & Waser, N. M. (1999) Effects of local density on pollination and reproduction in Delphinium nuttallianum and Aconitum columbianum (Ranunculaceae). American Journal of Botany, 86, 871–879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burd, M. (1994) Bateman's principle and plant reproduction: the role of pollen limitation in fruit and seed set. The Botanical Review, 60, 83–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, D. R. (1985) Pollen and gene dispersal: the influences of competition for pollination. Evolution, 39, 418–431CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cane, J. H. (2001) Habitat fragmentation and native bees: a premature verdict?Conservation Ecology, 5, 3 (online). http://www.consecol.org/vol5/iss1/art3/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cascante, A., Quesada, M., Lobo, J. J. & Fuchs, E. A. (2002) Effects of dry tropical forest fragmentation on the reproductive success and genetic structure of the tree Samanea saman. Conservation Biology, 16, 137–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chase, M. R., Moller, C., Kesseli, R. & Bawa, K. S. (1996) Distant gene flow in tropical trees. Nature, 383, 398–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Consiglio, T. K. & Bourne, G. R. (2001) Pollination and breeding system of a neotropical palm Astrocaryum vulgare in Guyana: a test of the predictability of syndromes. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 17, 577–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copland, B. J. & Whelan, R. J. (1989) Seasonal variation in flowering intensity and pollination limitation of fruit set in four co-occurring Banksia species. Journal of Ecology, 77, 509–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cordeiro, N. J. & Howe, H. F. (2001) Low recruitment of trees dispersed by animals in African forest fragments. Conservation Biology, 15, 1733–1741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corlett, R. T. (1998) Frugivory and seed dispersal by vertebrates in the Oriental (Indomalayan) region. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 73, 413–448CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costin, B. J., Morgan, J. W. & Young, A. G. (2001) Reproductive success does not decline in fragmented populations of Leucochrysum albicans subsp. albicans var. tricolor (Asteraceae). Biological Conservation, 98, 273–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cotton, P. A. (1998) The hummingbird community of a lowland Amazonian rainforest. Ibis, 140, 512–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cresswell, J. E. (1997) Spatial heterogeneity, pollinator behaviour and pollinator-mediated gene flow: bumblebee movements in variously aggregated rows of oil-seed rape. Oikos, 78, 546–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cresswell, J. E. (2000) A comparison of bumblebees' movements in uniform and aggregated distributions of their forage plant. Ecological Entomology, 25, 19–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, S. A. (1996) Pollen supply limits fruit initiation by a rain forest understorey palm. Journal of Ecology, 84, 185–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, S. A. (2000) Depressed pollination in habitat fragments causes low fruit set. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 267, 1149–1152CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dick, C. W., Etchelecu, G. & Austerlitz, F. (2003) Pollen dispersal of tropical trees (Dinizia excelsa: Fabaceae) by native insects and African honeybees in pristine and fragmented Amazonian rainforest. Molecular Ecology, 12, 753–764CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Didham, R. K., Ghazoul, J., Stork, N. E. & Davis, A. J. (1996) Insects in fragmented forests: a functional approach. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 11, 255–260CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dieringer, G. (1992) Pollinator effectiveness and seed set in populations of Agalinis strictifolia (Scrophulariaceae). American Journal of Botany, 79, 1018–1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehlers, B. K., Olesen, J. M. & Ågren, J. (2002) Floral morphology and reproductive success in the orchid Epipactis helleborine: regional and local across-habitat variation. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 236, 19–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrlen, J., Kack, S. & Ågren, J. (2002) Pollen limitation, seed predation and scape length in Primula farinosa. Oikos, 97, 45–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elberling, H. (2001) Pollen limitation of reproduction in a subarctic-alpine population of Diapensia lapponica (Diapensiaceae). Nordic Journal of Botany, 21, 277–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellstrand, N. C. (1992) Gene flow by pollen: implications for plant conservation genetics. Oikos, 63, 77–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epperson, B. K. & Clegg, M. T. (1987) Frequency-dependent variation for outcrossing rate among flower color morphs of Ipomoea purpurea. Evolution, 41, 1302–1311CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feinsinger, P., Murray, K. G., Kinsman, S. & Busby, W. H. (1986) Floral neighborhood and pollination success in four hummingbird-pollinated cloud forest plant species. Ecology, 67, 449–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feinsinger, P., Tiebout, H. M. & Young, B. E. (1991) Do tropical bird-pollinated plants exhibit density-dependent interactions? Field experiments. Ecology, 72, 1953–1963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, T. H., Nunez, R. A. & Sternberg, L. S. (1993) Seasonal changes in the diets of migrant and non-migrant nectarivorous bats as revealed by carbon stable isotope analysis. Oecologia, 94, 72–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankie, G. W., Opler, P. A. & Bawa, K. S. (1976) Foraging behaviour of solitary bees: implications for outcrossing of a neotropical forest tree species. Journal of Ecology, 64, 1049–1058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fritz, A.-L. & Nilsson, L. A. (1994) How pollinator-mediated mating varies with population size in plants. Oecologia, 100, 451–462CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fuchs, E. J., Lobo, J. A. & Quesada, M. (2003) Effects of forest fragmentation and flowering phenology on the reproductive success and mating patterns of the tropical dry forest tree Pachira quinata. Conservation Biology, 17, 149–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galetti, M., Alves-Costa, C. P. & Cazetta, E. (2003) Effects of forest fragmentation, anthropogenic edges and fruit colour on the consumption of ornithocoric fruits. Biological Conservation, 111, 269–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghazoul, J. (2002) Flowers at the front line of invasion?Ecological Entomology, 27, 638–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghazoul, J. (2004) Alien abduction: disruption of native plant–pollinator interactions by invasive species. Biotropica, 36, 156–164Google Scholar
Ghazoul, J. & McLeish, M. (2001) Reproductive ecology of tropical forest trees in logged and fragmented habitats in Thailand and Costa Rica. Plant Ecology, 153, 335–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghazoul, J., Liston, K. A. & Boyle, T. J. B. (1998) Disturbance-induced density-dependent seed set in Shorea siamensis (Dipterocarpaceae), a tropical forest tree. Journal of Ecology, 86, 462–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwillie, C. (2001) Pollen limitation and the evolution of self-compatibility in Linanthus (Polemoniaceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences, 162, 1283–1292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goverde, M., Schweizer, K., Baur, B. & Erhardt, A. (2002) Small-scale habitat fragmentation effects on pollinator behaviour: experimental evidence from the bumblebee Bombus veteranus on calcareous grasslands. Biological Conservation, 104, 293–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groom, M. J. (1998) Allee effects limit population viability of an annual plant. American Naturalist, 151, 487–496CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Groom, M. J. (2001) Consequences of subpopulation isolation for pollination, herbivory, and population growth in Clarkia concinna concinna (Onagraceae). Biological Conservation, 100, 55–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guariguata, M. R., Arias-Le Claire, H. & Jones, G. (2002) Tree seed fate in a logged and fragmented forest landscape, northeastern Costa Rica. Biotropica, 34, 405–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, P., Walker, S. & Bawa, K. (1996) Effect of forest fragmentation on genetic diversity and mating system in a tropical tree, Pithecellobium elegans. Conservation Biology, 10, 757–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, M. B. (1999) Tropical tree gene flow and seed dispersal. Nature, 401, 129–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heithaus, E. R., Stashko, E. & Anderson, P. K. (1982) Cumulative effects of plant–animal interactions on seed production by Bauhinia ungulata, a neotropical legume. Ecology, 63, 1294–1302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendrix, S. D. & Kyhl, J. F. (2000) Population size and reproduction in Phlox pilosa. Conservation Biology, 14, 304–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horner, M. A., Fleming, T. H. & Sahley, C. T. (1998) Foraging behaviour and energetics of a nectar-feeding bat, Leptonycteris curasoae (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae). Journal of Zoology, 244, 575–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House, S. M. (1993) Pollination success in a population of dioecious rain forest trees. Oecologia, 96, 555–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janzen, D. H. (1971) Euglossine bees as long-distance pollinators of tropical plants. Science, 171, 203–205CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jennersten, O. (1988) Pollination in Dianthus deltoides (Caryophyllaceae): effects of habitat fragmentation on visitation and seed set. Conservation Biology, 2, 359–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennersten, O. & Nilsson, S. G. (1993) Insect flower visitation frequency and seed production in relation to patch size of Viscaria vulgaris (Caryophyllaceae). Oikos, 68, 283–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, L. K. & Hubbell, S. P. (1975) Contrasting foraging strategies and coexistence of two bee species on a single resorce. Ecology, 56, 1398–1406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kearns, C. A. (2001) North American dipteran pollinators: assessing their value and conservation status. Conservation Ecology, 5 [online] http://www.consecol.org/vol5/iss1/art5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kearns, C. A., Inouye, D. W. & Waser, N. W. (1998) Endangered mutualisms: the conservation of plant–pollinator interactions. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 29, 83–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klinkhamer, P. G. L. & Jong, T. J. (1990) Effects of plant size, plant density and sex differential nectar reward on pollinator visitation in the protandrous Echium vulgare (Boraginaceae). Oikos, 57, 399–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klinkhamer, P. G. L., Jong, T. J. & Bruyn, G.-J. (1989) Plant size and pollinator visitation in Cynoglossum officinale. Oikos, 54, 201–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knapp, E. E., Goedde, M. A. & Rice, K. J. (2001) Pollen-limited reproduction in blue oak: implications for wind pollination in fragmented populations. Oecologia, 128, 48–55CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knudsen, J. T., Tollsten, L. & Ervik, F. (2001) Flower scent and pollination in selected neotropical palms. Plant Biology, 3, 642–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koenig, W. D. & Ashley, M. V. (2003) Is pollen limited? The answer is blowin' in the wind. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 18, 157–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunin, W. & Iwasa, Y. (1996) Pollinator foraging strategies in mixed floral arrays: density effects and floral constancy. Theoretical Population Biology, 49, 232–263CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kunin, W. E. (1992) Density and reproductive success in wild populations of Diplotaxis erucodes (Brassicaceae). Oecologia, 91, 129–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunin, W. E. (1993) Sex and the single mustard: population density and pollinator behavior effects on seed-set. Ecology, 74, 2145–2160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunin, W. E. (1997) Population size and density effects in pollination: pollinator foraging and plant reproductive success in experimental arrays of Brassica kaber. Journal of Ecology, 85, 225–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamont, B. B., Klinkhamer, P. G. L. & Witkowski, E. T. F. (1993) Population fragmentation may reduce fertility to zero in Banksia goodii – a demonstration of the Allee effect. Oecologia, 94, 446–450CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larson, B. M. H. & Barrett, S. C. H. (2000) A comparative analysis of pollen limitation in flowering plants. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 69, 503–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, B. S. & Lean, M. (1999) Common blossom bats (Syconycteris australis) as pollinators in fragmented Australian tropical rainforest. Biological Conservation, 91, 201–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, D. A. (1972) Pollen exchange as a function of species proximity inPhlox. Evolution, 26, 251–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, D. A. & Kerster, H. W. (1971) Neighborhood structure of plants under diverse reproductive methods. American Naturalist, 105, 345–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linhart, Y. B. & Feinsinger, P. (1980) Plant–hummingbird interactions: effects of island size and degree of specialization on pollination. Journal of Ecology, 68, 745–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liow, L. H., Sodhi, N. S. & Elmqvist, T. (2001) Bee diversity along a disturbance gradient in tropical lowland forests of Southeast Asia. Journal of Applied Ecology, 38, 180–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luijten, S. H., Dierick, A., Oostermeijer, J. G. B., Raijmann, L. E. L. & Nijs, H. C. M. (2000) Population size, genetic variation, and reproductive success in a rapidly declining, self-incompatible perennial (Arnica montana) in The Netherlands. Conservation Biology, 14, 1776–1787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marr, D. L., Leebens-Mack, J., Elms, L. & Pellmyr, O. (2000) Pollen dispersal in Yucca filamentosa (Agavaceae): the paradox of self-pollination behavior by Tegeticula yuccasella (Prodoxidae). American Journal of Botany, 87, 670–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Memmott, J. (1999) The structure of a plant–pollinator food web. Ecology Letters, 2, 276–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menges, E. (1991) Seed germination percentage increases with population size in a fragmented prairie species. Conservation Biology, 5, 158–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Momose, K., Yumoto, T., Nagamitsu, T.et al. (1998) Pollination biology in a lowland dipterocarp forest in Sarawak, Malaysia. I. Characteristics of the plant–pollinator community in a lowland dipterocarp forest. American Journal of Botany, 85, 1477–1501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moody-Weis, J. M. & Heywood, J. S. (2001) Pollination limitation to reproductive success in the Missouri evening primrose, Oenothera macrocarpa (Onagraceae). American Journal of Botany, 88, 1615–1622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, J. W. (1999) Effects of population size on seed production and germinability in an endangered, fragmented grassland plant. Conservation Biology, 13, 266–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murawski, D. A. & Gilbert, L. E. (1986) Pollen flow in Psiguria warscewiczii: a comparison of Heliconius butterflies and hummingbirds. Oecologia, 68, 161–167CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murawski, D. A. & Hamrick, J. L. (1992) The mating system of Cavanillesia platanifolia under extremes of flowering-tree density: a test of predictions. Biotropica, 24, 99–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murawski, D. A., Hamrick, J. L., Hubbell, S. P. & Foster, R. B. (1990) Mating systems of two bombacaceous trees of a neotropical moist forest. Oecologia, 82, 501–506CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murawski, D. A., Gunatilleke, I. A. U. N. & Bawa, K. S. (1994) The effects of selective logging on inbreeding in Shorea megistophylla (Dipterocarpaceae) from Sri Lanka. Conservation Biology, 8, 997–1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nason, J. D., Herre, E. A. & Hamrick, J. L. (1998) The breeding structure of a tropical keystone plant resource. Nature, 391, 685–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, A. & Ims, R. A. (2000) Bumble bee pollination of the sticky catchfly in a fragmented agricultural landscape. Ecoscience, 7, 157–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nilsson, S. G. & Wastljung, U. (1987) Seed predation and cross-pollination in mast-seeding beech (Fagus sylvatica) patches. Ecology, 68, 260–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olesen, J. M. & Warncke, E. (1989) Temporal changes in pollen flow and neighborhood-structure in a population of Saxifraga hirculus L. Oecologia, 79, 205–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, K. M. (1997) Pollination effectiveness and pollinator importance in a population of Heterotheca subaxillaris (Asteraceae). Oecologia, 109, 114–121Google Scholar
Pettersson, M. W. (1997) Solitary plants do as well as clumped ones in Silene uniflora (Caryophyllaceae). Ecography, 20, 375–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platt, W. J., Hill, G. R. & Clark, S. (1974) Seed production in a prairie legume (Astragalus canadensis L). Oecologia, 17, 55–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quesada, M., Stoner, K. E., Rosas-Guerrero, V., Palacios-Guevara, C. & Lobo, J. A. (2003) Effects of habitat disruption on the activity of nectarivorous bats (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) in a dry tropical forest: implications for the reproductive success of the neotropical tree Ceiba grandiflora. Oecologia, 135, 400–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasmussen, I. R. & Brodsgaard, B. (1992) Gene flow inferred from seed dispersal and pollinator behavior compared to DNA analysis of restriction site variation in a patchy population of Lotus corniculatus L. Oecologia, 89, 277–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richter, K. S. & Weis, A. E. (1998) Inbreeding and outcrossing in Yucca whipplei: consequences for the reproductive success of plant and pollinator. Ecology Letters, 1, 21–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, A. W., Kelly, D., Ladley, J. J. & Sparrow, A. D. (1999) Effects of pollinator loss on endemic New Zealand mistletoes (Loranthaceae). Conservation Biology, 13, 499–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roll, J., Mitchell, R. J., Cabin, R. J. & Marshall, D. L. (1997) Reproductive success increases with local density of conspecifics in a desert mustard (Lesquerella fendleri). Conservation Biology, 11, 738–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roubik, D. W. (2001) Ups and downs in pollinator populations: when is there a decline?Conservation Ecology, 5 [online] http://www.consecol.org/vol5/iss1/art2/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakai, S., Momose, K., Yumoto, T., Kato, M. & Inoue, T. (1999) Beetle pollination of Shorea parvifolia (section Mutica, Dipterocarpaceae) in a general flowering period in Sarawak, Malaysia. American Journal of Botany, 86, 62–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, T., Telleria, J. L. & Virgos, E. (1999) Dispersal of Spanish juniper Juniperus thurifera by birds and mammals in a fragmented landscape. Ecography, 22, 193–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, J. (1983) Flowering plant density and pollinator visitation in Senecio. Oecologia, 60, 97–102CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schulke, B. & Waser, N. M. (2001) Long-distance pollinator flights and pollen dispersal between populations of Delphinium nuttallianum. Oecologia, 127, 239–245CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Severns, P. (2003) Inbreeding and small population size reduce seed set in a threatened and fragmented plant species, Lupinus sulphureus ssp. kincaidii (Fabaceae). Biological Conservation, 110, 221–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sih, A. & Baltus, M. S. (1987) Patch size, pollinator behavior, and pollinator limitation in catnip. Ecology, 68, 1679–1690CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silander, J. A. (1978) Density-dependent control of reproductive success in Cassia biflora. Biotropica, 10, 292–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smithson, A. & Macnair, M. R. (1996) Frequency-dependent selection by pollinators: mechanisms and consequences with regard to behaviour of bumblebees Bombus terrestris (L) (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 9, 571–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smithson, A. & Macnair, M. R. (1997) Density-dependent and frequency-dependent selection by bumblebees Bombus terrestris (L) (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 60, 401–417Google Scholar
Sork, V. L. (1993) Evolutionary ecology of mast-seeding in temperate and tropical oaks (Quercus spp.). Vegetatio, 107/108, 133–147Google Scholar
Sowig, P. (1989) Effects of flowering plant's patch size on species composition of pollinator communities, foraging strategies, and resource partitioning in bumblebees (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Oecologia, 78, 550–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steffan-Dewenter, I. & Tscharntke, T. (1999) Effects of habitat isolation on pollinator communities and seed set. Oecologia, 121, 432–440CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomson, J. D. (1981) Spatial and temporal components of resource assessment by flower-feeding insects. Journal of Animal Ecology, 50, 49–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossum, F., Echchgadda, G., Szabadi, I. & Triest, L. (2002) Commonness and long-term survival in fragmented habitats: Primula elatior as a study case. Conservation Biology, 16, 1286–1295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treuren, R., Bijlsma, R., Ouborg, N. J. & Delman, W. (1993) The effects of population size and plant density on outcrossing rates in locally endangered Salvia pratensis. Evolution, 47, 1094–1104CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Veit, R. R. & Lewis, M. A. (1996) Dispersal, population growth, and the Allee effect: dynamics of the house finch invasion of eastern North America. American Naturalist, 148, 255–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vergeer, P., Rengelink, R., Copal, A. & Ouborg, N. J. (2003) The interacting effects of genetic variation, habitat quality and population size on performance of Succisa pratensis. Journal of Ecology, 91, 18–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visscher, P. K. & Seeley, T. D. (1982) Foraging strategy of honeybee colonies in a temperate deciduous forest. Ecology, 63, 1790–1801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waser, N. M. (1982) A comparison of distances flown by different visitors to flowers of the same species. Oecologia, 55, 251–257CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waser, N. M., Chittka, L., Price, M. V., Williams, N. M. & Ollerton, J. (1996) Generalization in pollination systems, and why it matters. Ecology, 77, 1043–1060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Washitani, I. (1996) Predicted genetic consequences of strong fertility selection due to pollinator loss in an isolated population of Primula sieboldii. Conservation Biology, 10, 59–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whelan, R. J. & Goldingay, R. L. (1986) Do pollinators influence seed-set in Banksia paludosa Sm. and Banksia spinulosa R. Br.?Australian Journal of Ecology, 11, 181–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widen, B. (1993) Demographic and genetic effects on reproduction as related to population size in a rare, perennial herb, Senecio integrifolius (Asteraceae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 50, 179–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widen, B. & Widen, M. (1990) Pollen limitation and distance-dependent fecundity in females of the clonal gynodioecious herb Glechoma hederacea (Lamiaceae). Oecologia, 83, 191–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willmer, P., Gilbert, F., Ghazoul, J., Zalat, S. & Semida, F. (1994) A novel form of territoriality: daily paternal investment in an anthophorid bee. Animal Behaviour, 48, 535–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willmott, A. P. & Burquez, A. (1996) The pollination of Merremia palmeri (Convolvulaceae): can hawk moths be trusted?American Journal of Botany, 83, 1050–1056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, M. & Pyke, G. H. (1988) Reproduction in Polemonium: assessing the factors limiting seed set. American Naturalist, 131, 723–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6
Cited by

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×