Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-56f9d74cfd-b2czv Total loading time: 0.509 Render date: 2022-06-24T23:52:58.024Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

2 - An Uber Ambivalence

Employee Status, Worker Perspectives, and Regulation in the Gig Economy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 October 2020

Deepa Das Acevedo
Affiliation:
University of Alabama School of Law
Get access

Summary

Before beginning to work for Lyft in 2013, Kevin Banks spent twenty-five years as a unionized carpenter in Northern California. He made “pretty dang good money” working in construction, especially after his promotion to general foreman. But Kevin was badly injured on the job, and the timing of the injury coincided with the Great Recession. A white, native-born American who came from a union family, Kevin had never performed nonunion, low-wage work, but by 2009, his job choices were limited. With a trace of resigned shame in his voice, he disclosed in one of our conversations over coffee

Type
Chapter
Information
Beyond the Algorithm
Qualitative Insights for Gig Work Regulation
, pp. 33 - 56
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acevedo, Deepa Das. “Unbundling Freedom in the Sharing Economy.” S. Cal. L. Rev. 91 (2017): 793.Google Scholar
Berg, Janine, and Johnston, Hannah. “Too Good to Be True? A Comment on Hall and Krueger’s Analysis of the Labor Market for Uber’s Driver-Partners.” ILR Review 72, no. 1 (2019): 3968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, Thor, Frey, Carl Benedikt, Levin, Guy, and Danda, Santosh Rao. “Uber Happy? Work and Well-being in the ‘Gig Economy.’” Economic Policy (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boltanski, Luc, and Chiapello, Eve. The New Spirit of Capitalism. Verso, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan-Oliver, Margo, and Cruz, Angela. “Discourses of Technology Consumption: Ambivalence, Fear, and Liminality.” ACR North American Advances (2011).Google Scholar
Collier, Ruth Berins, Dubal, V. B., and Carter, Christopher L.. “Disrupting Regulation, Regulating Disruption: The Politics of Uber in the United States.” Perspectives on Politics 16, no. 4 (2018): 919937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conger, Kate, and Scheiber, Noam. “California Bill Makes App-Based Companies Treat Workers as Employees.” New York Times, Sept, 11, 2019. www.nytimes.com/2019/09/11/technology/california-gig-economy-bill.html.Google Scholar
“CA AB5 Law: Now We Need a Global Law for ‘Gig’ Workers.” Sept. 12, 2019. www.itfglobal.org/en/news/california-ab-5-law-now-we-need-global-law-gig-workers.Google Scholar
Conner, Mark, and Armitage, Christopher J.. “Attitudinal Ambivalence.” Attitudes and Attitude Change (2008): 261286.Google Scholar
Craig, S., and Martinez, M., eds. Ambivalence, Politics and Public Policy. Springer, 2016.Google Scholar
Cunningham-Parmeter, Keith. “From Amazon to Uber: Defining Employment in the Modern Economy.” BUL Rev. 96 (2016): 16731728.Google Scholar
DeBruyne, Nicholas L.Uber Drivers: A Disputed Employment Relationship in Light of the Sharing Economy.” Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 92 (2017): 289315.Google Scholar
Dubal, V. B.Wage Slave or Entrepreneur: Contesting the Dualism of Legal Worker Identities.” Calif. L. Rev. 105 (2017): 65123.Google Scholar
Dubal, V. B. “Winning the Battle, Losing the War: Assessing the Impact of Misclassification Litigation on Workers in the Gig Economy.” Wis. L. Rev. (2017): 739802.Google Scholar
Dubal, V. B.The Drive to Precarity: A Political History of Work, Regulation, & Labor Advocacy in San Francisco’s Taxi & Uber Economics.” Berkeley J. Emp. & Lab. L. 38 (2017): 73136.Google Scholar
Eagly, Alice H., and Chaiken, Shelly. The Psychology of Attitudes. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers, 1993.Google Scholar
“Employer Costs for Employee Compensation.” Bureau of Labor Statistics, Department of Labor, June 2019. www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/ecec.pdf.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S., and Pierson, Paul. “Business Power and Social Policy: Employers and the Formation of the American Welfare State.” Politics & Society 30, no. 2 (2002): 277325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Jonathan V., and Krueger, Alan B.. “An Analysis of the Labor Market for Uber’s Driver-Partners in the United States.” ILR Review 71, no. 3 (2018): 705732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaltner, Jillian. “Employment Status of Uber and Lyft Drivers: Unsettlingly Settled.” Hastings Women’s LJ 29 (2018): 2954.Google Scholar
Paul, Sanjukta M.The Enduring Ambiguities of Antitrust Liability for Worker Collective Action.” Loy. U. Chi. LJ 47 (2015): 9691048.Google Scholar
Said, Carolyn. “Uber Circulates New Gig Bill as Alternative to AB5.” San Francisco Chronicle. Sept. 20, 2019. www.sfchronicle.com/business/article/Uber-circulates-new-gig-work-bill-as-alternative-14426247.php.Google Scholar
Snyder, Benjamin H. The Disrupted Workplace: Time and the Moral Order of Flexible Capitalism. Oxford University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teamsters, Lyft Drivers to File Objections in Class Action Lawsuit Settlement, March 15, 2016. https://teamster.org/news/2016/03/teamsters-lyft-drivers-file-objections-class-action-lawsuit-settlement.Google Scholar
Tomassetti, Julia. “Who Is a Worker? Partisanship, the National Labor Relations Board, and the Social Content of Employment.” Law & Social Inquiry 37, no. 4 (2012): 815847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Uber in Legal Battle Over Drivers’ Employment.” ABC 7 News, Aug. 6, 2015. https://abc7news.com/business/uber-in-legal-battle-over-drivers-employment/909341/.Google Scholar
West, Tony. “Uber: Drivers Tell Us Through Focus Groups and Surveys They Don’t Want to Be Employees.” USA Today, Sept. 16, 2019. www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2019/09/16/uber-drivers-tell-us-they-dont-want-employees-editorials-debates/2346851001/.Google Scholar
Zatz, Noah. “Beyond Misclassification: Tackling the Independent Contractor Problem without Redefining Employment.” ABA Journal of Labor & Employment Law (2011): 279294.Google Scholar
2
Cited by

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×