Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-14T02:34:23.423Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false


Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2010

James G. Lennox
University of Pittsburgh
Robert Bolton
Rutgers University, New Jersey
Get access


Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Being, Nature, and Life in Aristotle
Essays in Honor of Allan Gotthelf
, pp. 270 - 276
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Ackrill, J. L. 1972/3, “Aristotle's Definitions of Psyche,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 73: 119–33. (Reprinted in Ackrill, J. L. 1997, Essays on Plato and Aristotle, Oxford.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annas, J. 1999, Platonic Ethics Old and New, Ithaca and London.Google Scholar
Balme, D. M. 1987, “Aristotle's Use of Division and Differentiae,” in Gotthelf, and Lennox, 1987, 69–89.
Balme, D. M. 1992, Aristotle: De partibus animalium I and De generatione animalium I (with passages from II. 1–3), Oxford.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. 1981, “Proof and the Syllogism,” in Berti, 1981, 17–59.
Barnes, J (ed.) 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, Princeton.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. 1994, Aristotle: Posterior Analytics, 2nd edn., Oxford.Google Scholar
Berti, E. (ed.) 1981, Aristotle on Science: The “Posterior Analytics,”Padua.Google Scholar
Bleier, R. 1984, Science and Gender: A Critique of Biology and its Theories on Women, New York.Google Scholar
Bodéus, R. 1982, Le philosophe et la cité, Paris.Google Scholar
Bodéus, R. 1993, The Political Dimensions of Aristotle's Ethics, trans. J. E. Garrett, Albany.Google Scholar
Bodéus, R. 2000, Aristotle and the Theology of the Living Immortals, Albany. (Original French edn.: Bodéüs, R. 1992, Aristote et la théologie des vivants immortels, Paris and Montreal.)Google Scholar
Bodnár, I. 2005, “Teleology across Natures,” Rhizai 2: 9–29.Google Scholar
Bolton, R. 1993, “Division, définition et essence dans la science aristotélicienne,” Revue Philosophique de la France et de l'Étranger 2: 197–222.Google Scholar
Bolton, R. 1995, “Science and the Science of Substance in Aristotle's Metaphysics Ζ,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 76: 419–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, R. 2002, “Substance and the Definition of Definition in Aristotle,” in Canto-Sperber, and Pellegrin, 2002, 155–81.
Bostock, D. 1994, Aristotle's Metaphysics, Books Z and H, Oxford.Google Scholar
Broadie, S. 1990, “Nature and Craft in Aristotelian Teleology,” in Devereux, and Pellegrin, 1990, 389–403.
Broadie, S. and Rowe, C. 2002, Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics, Translation, Introduction, and Commentary, Oxford.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. 1981, “L'objet et la structure des Seconds Analytiques d'après Aristote,” in Berti, 1981, 61–96.
Burnet, J. 1900, Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics, London.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. 1984, Notes on Eta and Theta of Aristotle's Metaphysics, Oxford.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. 1990, The Theatetus of Plato, trans. M. J. Levett, revised by M. F. Burnyeat, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. 2001, A Map of Metaphysics Zeta, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. 2004, “Introduction: Aristotle on the Foundations of Sublunary Physics,” in Haas, and Mansfeld, 2004, 7–24.
Burnyeat, M. F. 2008, “Kinēsis vs. Energeia: A Much-Read Passage in (but not of) Aristotle's Metaphysics,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 34: 219–92.Google Scholar
Canto-Sperber, M. and Pellegrin, P. (eds.) 2002, Le style de la pensée, Paris.Google Scholar
Charles, D. 1984, Aristotle's Philosophy of Action, London.Google Scholar
Charles, D. 1986, “Aristotle: Ontology and Moral Reasoning,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 4: 119–44.Google Scholar
Charles, D. 1988, “Aristotle on Hypothetical Necessity and Irreducibility,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 69: 1–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles, D. 1991, “Teleological Causation in the Physics,” in Aristotle's Physics, ed. Judson, L., Oxford, 101–28.Google Scholar
Charles, D. 1994, “Matter and Form: Unity, Persistence, and Identity,” in Scaltsas, , Charles, , and Gill, 1994, 75–105.
Charles, D. 2000, Aristotle on Meaning and Essence, Oxford.Google Scholar
Charles, D. 2004, “GC I.5: Simple Genesis and Prime Matter,” in Haas, and Mansfeld, 2004, 151–69.
Christ, W. (ed.) 1885, Aristotelis Metaphysica, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Code, A. 1996, “Owen on the Development of Aristotle's Metaphysics,” in Aristotle's Philosophical Development, ed. Wians, W., Lanham, 303–26.Google Scholar
Code, A. 1997, “The Priority of Final Causes over Efficient Causes in Aristotle's PA,” in Kullmann, and Föllinger, 1997, 127–43.
Colli, G. 1955, Aristotele, Organon, Turin.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. M. 1982, “Aristotle on Natural Teleology,” in Language and Logos, ed. Schofield, M. and Nussbaum, M., Cambridge, 197–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, J. M. 1999, Reason and Emotion, Princeton.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. M. 2004, Knowledge, Nature, and the Good, Princeton and Oxford.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. M. 2009, “Nicomachean Ethicsvii 1–2: Introduction, Method, and Puzzles,” in Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics, Book VII. Symposium Aristotelicum, ed. Natali, Carlo, Oxford, 9–39.Google Scholar
Haas, F. and Mansfeld, J (eds.) 2004, Aristotle's On Generation and Corruption, Book I. Symposium Aristotelicum, Oxford.Google Scholar
Denniston, J. D. 1966, The Greek Particles, 2nd edn. Oxford.Google Scholar
Deslauriers, M. 1998, “Sex and Essence in Aristotle's Metaphysics and Biology,” in Feminist Interpretations of Aristotle, ed. Freeland, Cynthia, University Park, 138–67.Google Scholar
Devereux, D. and Pellegrin, P. (eds.) 1990, Biologie, Logique et Métaphysique chez Aristote, Paris.Google Scholar
Diels, H. and Kranz, W. 1951, Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, 3 vols., 6th edn., Dublin and Zurich.Google Scholar
Duke, E. A., Hicken, W. F., Nicoll, W. S. M., Robinson, D. B., and Strachan, J. C. G. (eds.) 1995, Platonis opera, vol. i, Oxford.
Düring, I. 1943, Aristotle's De partibus animalium: Critical and Literary Commentaries, Göteborg.Google Scholar
Elshtain, J. B. 1981, Public Man, Private Woman, Princeton.Google Scholar
Falcon, A. 2005, Aristotle and the Science of Nature, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frede, M. 1987, “Categories in Aristotle,” Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy, Minneapolis, 29–48.Google Scholar
Frede, M. 1990, “The Definition of Sensible Substances inMetaphysics Z,” in Devereux and Pellegrin 1990, 113–29.Google Scholar
Frede, M. 1994, “Potentiality in the Metaphysics,” in Scaltsas, , Charles, , and Gill, 1994, 188–93.
Frede, M. and Patzig, G. 1988, Aristoteles Metaphysik Z, Munich.Google Scholar
Freeland, C. 1987, “Aristotle on Bodies, Matter, and Potentiality,” in Gotthelf, and Lennox, 1987, 392–407.
Furley, D. 1985, “The Rainfall Example in Physics ii.8,” in Gotthelf, 1985a, 177–82.
Gerson, L. P. 2005, Aristotle and Other Platonists, Ithaca and London.Google Scholar
Gill, M. L. 1989, Aristotle on Substance: The Paradox of Unity, Princeton.Google Scholar
Gill, M. L. 1995, “Aristotle on Substance and Predication,” Ancient Philosophy 15: 511–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, M. L. 2003, “The Unity of Substances in Metaphysics H.6,” (in Portuguese) in Cadernos de História e Filosofia da Ciência, Series 3, 13: 177–203.Google Scholar
Gill, M. L. 2008, “Form–Matter Predication in Metaphysics Θ.7,” in Dunamis: Autour de la puissance chez Aristote, ed. Crubelier, M., Jaulin, A., and Lefebvre, D., Leuven, 391–427.Google Scholar
Gill, M. L. 2009, “The Divine Method in Plato's Philebus,” in Plato's Philebus. Selected Papers from the Eighth Symposium Platonicum, ed. Dillon, J. and Brisson, L., Augustin, Sankt, 36–46.
Goldin, O. 1996, Explaining an Eclipse. Aristotle's Posterior Analytics 2.1–10, Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gotthelf, A. (ed.) 1985a, Aristotle on Nature and Living Things, Pittsburgh and Bristol.
Gotthelf, A. 1985b, “Notes towards a Study of Substance and Essence in Aristotle's Parts of Animals ii–iv,” in Gotthelf, 1985a, 27–54.
Gotthelf, A. 1987, “First Principles in Aristotle's Parts of Animals,” in Gotthelf, and Lennox, 1987, 167–98.
Gotthelf, A. 1989, “The Place of the Good in Aristotle's Natural Teleology,” in Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy vol. iv, ed. Cleary, J. J. and Shartin, D., Lanham, MD, 113–39.
Gotthelf, A. 1997a, “Division and Explanation in Aristotle's Parts of Animals,” in Beiträge zur antiken Philosophie. Festschrift für Wolfgang Kullmann, ed. Hans-Christian Günther, and Rengakos, A., Stuttgart, 215–30.
Gotthelf, A. 1997b, “The Elephant's Nose: Further Reflections on the Axiomatic Structure of Biological Explanation in Aristotle,” in Kullmann, and Föllinger, 1997, 85–96.
Gotthelf, A. 1997c, “Understanding Aristotle's Teleology,” in Final Causality in Nature and Human Affairs, ed. Hassling, R. F., Washington, 71–85.
Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.) 1987, Philosophical Issues in Aristotle's Biology, Cambridge.CrossRef
Gregoric, P. 2005, “Plato's and Aristotle's Explanation of Human Posture,”Rhizai 2: 183–96.Google Scholar
Halper, E. 1989, One and Many in Aristotle's Metaphysics, Columbus.Google Scholar
Harte, V. 1996, “Aristotle's Metaphysics H6: a Dialectic with Platonism,” Phronesis 41: 276–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayduck, M. (ed.), 1981, Alexander: Aristotelis Metaphysica commentaria, Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, vol. i, Berlin.
Henry, D. 2006a, “Aristotle on the Mechanism of Inheritance,” Journal for the History of Biology 39: 425–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, D. 2006b, “Understanding Aristotle's Reproductive Hylomorphism,” Apeiron 39.3: 269–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irwin, T. H. 1990, “The Good of Political Activity,” in Aristoteles' Politik, ed. Patzig, G., Göttingen, 73–98.Google Scholar
Jaeger, W. (ed.) 1957, Aristotelis Metaphysica, Oxford.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. R. 2005, Aristotle on Teleology, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judson, L. 1991, “Chance and ‘Always or For the Most Part,’” in Aristotle's Physics, ed. Judson, L., Oxford, 73–99.Google Scholar
Judson, L. 2005, “Aristotelian Teleology,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 29: 341–66.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. 1985, “The Place of the Prime Mover in Aristotle's Teleology,” in Gotthelf, 1985a, 183–205.
Keyt, D. 1991, “Three Basic Theorems in Aristotle's Politics,” in A Companion to Aristotle's Politics, ed. Keyt, D. and Miller, F., London, 54–79.Google Scholar
Kosman, A. 1984, “Substance, Being and Energeia: The Argument of Metaphysics Theta,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 2: 121–49.Google Scholar
Kosman, A. 1987, “Animals and Other Beings in Aristotle,” in Gotthelf, and Lennox, 1987, 360–91.
Kullmann, W. and Föllinger, S. (eds.) 1997, Aristotelische Biologie: Intentionen, Methoden, Ergebnisse, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Lamb, C. 1823, “A Dissertation upon Roast Pig,” Essays of Elia, London.Google Scholar
Lear, G. R. 2004, Happy Lives and the Highest Good, Princeton.Google Scholar
Lee, Mi-Kyoung 2005, Epistemology after Protagoras, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 1985, “Theophrastus on the Limits of Teleology,” in Theophrastus of Eresus: On his Life and Works, ed. Fortenbaugh, W. W., Huby, P. M., and Long, A. A., New Brunswick, NJ and Oxford, 143–64. (Reprinted in Lennox 2001b, 259–79.)Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 1987a, “Divide and Explain: the Posterior Analytics in Practice,” in Gotthelf, and Lennox, 1987, 90–119. (Reprinted in Lennox 2001b, 7–32.)
Lennox, J. G. 1987b, “Kinds, Forms of Kinds, and the More and the Less in Aristotle's Biology,” in Gotthelf, and Lennox, 1987, 339–59. (Reprinted in Lennox 2001b, 160–81.)
Lennox, J. G. 1996. “Putting Philosophy of Science to the Test: The Case of Aristotle's Biology,” in PSA Proceedings: 1994, vol. ii, ed. Forbes, M., Hull, D., and Burian, R., East Lansing, 239–47.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 2001a, Aristotle: On the Parts of Animals I–IV, Oxford.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 2001b, Aristotle's Philosophy of Biology: Studies in the Origins of Life Science, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 2005a, “Getting a Science Going: Aristotle on Entry Level Kinds,” in Wolters, and Carrier, 2005, 87–100.
Lennox, J. G. 2005b, “The Place of Zoology in Aristotle's Natural Philosophy,” in Sharples, 2005a, 58–70.
Lennox, J. G. 2010, “Bios and Explanatory Unity in Aristotle's Biology,” in Definition in Greek Philosophy, ed. Charles, D., Oxford, chapter 9.Google Scholar
Lewis, F. 1991, Substance and Predication in Aristotle, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lewis, F. 1994, “Aristotle on the Relation between a Thing and its Matter,” in Scaltsas, , Charles, , and Gill, 1994, 247–77.
Lewis, F. 1995, “Aristotle on the Unity of Substance,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 76: 222–65. (Reprinted in Lewis, F. A. and R. Bolton [eds.] 1996, Form, Matter, and Mixture in Aristotle, Oxford, 39–81.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liddell, H. G., Scott, R., and Jones, H. S. 1940, A Greek–English Lexicon, Oxford.Google Scholar
Liddell, H. G., Scott, R., and Jones, H. S. 1996, A Greek–English Lexicon, 9th edn. revised, Oxford.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1966, Polarity and Analogy, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1990, “Aristotle's Zoology and his Metaphysics,” in Devereux, and Pellegrin, 1990, 7–35.
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1993, “L'idée de la nature dans la Politique d'Aristote,” in Aristote, Politique, ed. Aubenque, P., Paris, 135–59. (Eng. trans. in Lloyd, G. E. R. 1996, Aristotelian Investigations, Cambridge, 184–204.)Google Scholar
Loux, M. J. 1995a, “APA Symposium on Aristotle's Metaphysics,” Ancient Philosophy 15: 495–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loux, M. J. 1995b, “Composition and Unity: An Examination of Metaphysics Η.6,” in The Crossroads of Norm and Nature: Essays on Aristotle's Ethics and Metaphysics, ed. Sim, May, Lanham, 242–79.Google Scholar
Maier, H. 1896–1900, Die Syllogistik des Aristoteles, 3 vols., Tübingen.Google Scholar
Makin, S. 2003, “What Does Aristotle Mean by Priority in Substance?,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 34: 209–38.Google Scholar
Makin, S. 2006, Aristotle: Metaphysics Book Θ, Oxford.
Mansion, S. 1976, Le jugement d'existence chez Aristote, 2nd edn., Louvain.Google Scholar
Matthen, M. 2001, “The Holistic Presuppositions of Aristotle's Cosmology,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 20: 171–99.Google Scholar
Mayhew, R. 2004, The Female in Aristotle's Biology: Reason or Rationalization, Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, J. 1973, Plato's Theaetetus, Oxford.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. 1979, “Virtue and Reason,” The Monist 72: 331–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKirahan, R. D. 1992, Principles and Proofs: Aristotle's Theory of Demonstrative Science, Princeton.Google Scholar
Mignucci, M. 1975, L'argomentazione dimostrativa in Aristotele: commento agli Analytici Secondi, vol. i, Padua.Google Scholar
Modrak, D. 2001, Aristotle's Theory of Language and Meaning, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Modrak, D. 2007, “Form and Function,” Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 22: 111–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mure, G. R. G. 1928, Analytica posteriora: The Works of Aristotle Translated into English, Oxford.Google Scholar
Osborne, C. 1988, “Topography in the Timaeus: Plato and Augustine on Mankind's Place in the Natural World,” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 214: 104–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peck, A. L. (trans.) 1963, Aristotle: Generation of Animals, London and Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Pellegrin, P. 1982, La classification des Animaux chez Aristote, Paris.Google Scholar
Pellegrin, P. 1985, “Zoology without Species,” in Gotthelf, 1985a, 95–115.
Pellegrin, P. 2002, “Les ruses de la nature et l'éternité du mouvement. Encore quelques remarques sur la finalité chez Aristote,” in Canto-Sperber, and Pellegrin, 2002, 296–323.
Pellegrin, P. 2005, Aristote: Seconds Analytiques Organon IV, Paris.Google Scholar
Peramatzis, M. 2008, “Aristotle's Notion of Priority in Nature and Substance,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 35: 187–247.Google Scholar
Reeve, C. D. C. 1998, Aristotle: Politics. Indianapolis and Cambridge.Google Scholar
Reeve, C. D. C. 2002, Substantial Knowledge, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. 1997, “Plato's World Soul: Grasping Sensibles without Sense-perception,” in Interpreting the Timaeus–Critias, ed. Calvo, T. and Brisson, L., Augustin, Sankt, 261–5.
Rhenius, R. 2005, Die Einheit der Substanzen bei Aristoteles, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romeyer Dherbey, G. 1996, Corps et Ame: Sur le De Anima d'Aristote, Paris.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. 1973, “Genus as Matter: A Reading of Metaphysics Z–H,” in Exegesis and Argument (Suppl. vol. i of Phronesis), ed. Lee, E. N., Mourelatos, A. P. D., and Rorty, R. M., New York, 393–420.Google Scholar
Ross, W. D. 1924, Aristotle's Metaphysics, 2 vols., Oxford.Google Scholar
Ross, W. D. 1928, Metaphysica. The Works of Aristotle Translated into English, Oxford.Google Scholar
Ross, W. D. 1949, Aristotle's Prior and Posterior Analytics, Oxford.Google Scholar
Scaltsas, T. 1994, “Substantial Holism,” in Scaltsas, , Charles, , and Gill, 1994, 107–28.
Scaltsas, T., Charles, D., and Gill, M. L. (eds.) 1994, Unity, Identity and Explanation in Aristotle's Metaphysics, Oxford.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 1991, “Is Aristotle's Teleology Anthropocentric?,” Phronesis 36: 179–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, D. 2000a, “The Ideal of Godlikeness,” in Plato, vol. ii, ed. Fine, G., Oxford, 309–28.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 2000b, “Metaphysics Lambda 10,” in Aristotle's Metaphysics Lambda, ed. Frede, M. and Charles, D., Oxford, 327–50.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 2005, “Les origines des preuves stoïciennes de l'existence de dieu,” Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 4: 461–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, D. 2007, Creationism and its Critics in Antiquity, Berkeley and Los Angeles.
Sellars, W. 1967, “Aristotle's Metaphysics: An Introduction,” Philosophical Perspectives, Springfield.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. 1983, Alexander of Aphrodisias on Fate, London.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. 2003, “Threefold Providence: The History and Background of a Doctrine,” in Ancient Approaches to Plato's Timaeus, ed. Sharples, R. W. and Sheppard, A., London, 107–27.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. (ed.) 2005a, Philosophy and the Sciences in Antiquity, London.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. 2005b, “Some Thoughts on Aristotelian Form: With Special Reference to Metaphysics Z.8,” Science in Context 18: 93–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shorey, P. 1924, “The Origin of Syllogism,” Classical Philology 19: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smyth, H. W. 1984, Greek Grammar, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Solmsen, F. 1929, Die Entwicklung der aristotelischen Logik und Rhetorik, Berlin.Google Scholar
Solmsen, F. 1963, “Nature as Craftsman in Greek Thought,” Journal of the History of Ideas 24: 473–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorabji, R. 1980, Necessity, Cause and Blame, London.Google Scholar
Todd, R. B. 1976, “The Four Causes: Aristotle's Exposition and the Ancients,” Journal of the History of Ideas 37: 319–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tricot, J. 1962, Les Seconds analytiques, Paris.Google Scholar
Verdenius, W. J. 1981, “Notes on Some Passages from Book i,” in Berti, 1981, 343–57.
Villee, C. A. and Dethier, V. G. 1971, Biological Principles and Processes, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Wallies, M. (ed.) 1900, Themistius: In Analyticorum posteriorum paraphrasis, Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, vol. v.1, Berlin.Google Scholar
Wallies, M. (ed.) 1909, Philoponus: In Aristotelis Analytica posteriora commentaria cum Anonymo in Librum II, Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, vol. xiii.3, Berlin.Google Scholar
Wardy, R. 1993, “Aristotelian Rainfall or the Lore of Averages,” Phronesis 38: 18–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wardy, R. 2005, “The Mysterious Aristotelian Olive,” Science in Context 18: 69–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, J. D. 1970, Molecular Biology of the Gene, New York.Google Scholar
Witt, C. 1989, Substance and Essence in Aristotle, Ithaca.Google Scholar
Wolters, G. and Carrier, M. (eds.) 2005, Homo Sapiens und Homo Faber, Berlin.CrossRef
Zabarella, J. 1594, In duos Aristotelis libros Posteriores analyticos commentarii (in Opera Logica), Bale.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Edited by James G. Lennox, University of Pittsburgh, Robert Bolton, Rutgers University, New Jersey
  • Book: Being, Nature, and Life in Aristotle
  • Online publication: 06 December 2010
  • Chapter DOI:
Available formats

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Edited by James G. Lennox, University of Pittsburgh, Robert Bolton, Rutgers University, New Jersey
  • Book: Being, Nature, and Life in Aristotle
  • Online publication: 06 December 2010
  • Chapter DOI:
Available formats

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Edited by James G. Lennox, University of Pittsburgh, Robert Bolton, Rutgers University, New Jersey
  • Book: Being, Nature, and Life in Aristotle
  • Online publication: 06 December 2010
  • Chapter DOI:
Available formats