Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-l69ms Total loading time: 1.852 Render date: 2022-08-15T16:09:19.589Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2017

Jason König
Affiliation:
University of St Andrews, Scotland
Greg Woolf
Affiliation:
Institute of Classical Studies, London
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agosta, G. (2009) Ricerche sui Cynegetica di Oppiano, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Albrecht, M. von (2008a) ‘Seneca's language and style, I’, Hyperboreus 14: 6890.Google Scholar
Albrecht, M. von (2008b) ‘Seneca's language and style, II: linguistic differences and connections between Seneca's philosophical works and his tragedies’, Hyperboreus 14: 124–50.Google Scholar
Alexander, L. (1993) The Preface to Luke's Gospel: Literary Convention and Social Context in Luke 1.1–4 and Acts 1.1, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Algra, K. (2009) ‘Stoic philosophical theology and Graeco-Roman religion’, in Salles, R. (ed.), God and Cosmos in Stoicism, Oxford: 224–51.Google Scholar
Allmand, C. (2009) ‘A Roman text on war: The Strategemata of Frontinus in the Middle Ages’, in Coss, P. and Tyerman, C. (eds), Soldiers, Nobles and Gentlemen: Essays in Honour of Maurice Keen, Woodbridge: 153–68.Google Scholar
Allmand, C. (2011) The De Re Militari of Vegetius: The Reception, Transmission and Legacy of a Roman Text in the Middle Ages, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amato, E. (2003) ‘Per la cronologia di Dionisio il Periegeta’, Revue de philologie 77: 716.Google Scholar
Amato, E. (2005) Dionisio di Alessandria: Descrizione della terra abitata. Prefazione, introduzione, traduzione, note e apparati, Milan.Google Scholar
Ambaglio, D. (1981) ‘Il trattato Sul Comandante di Onasandro’, Athenaeum 59: 353–77.Google Scholar
Ampolo, C. (1990–91) ‘Lotte sociali in Italia centrale. Un documento controverso: il calendario brontoscopico attribuito a Nigidio Figulo’, Opus 9–10: 185–97.Google Scholar
Anderson, G. (1986) Philostratus: Biography and Belles Lettres in the Third Century AD, London.Google Scholar
Ando, C. (ed.) (2003) Roman Religion, Edinburgh.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ando, C. (2008) The Matter of the Gods: Religion and the Roman Empire, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Andrén, A. (1960) ‘Dionysius of Halicarnassus on Roman monuments’, in Hommages à Léon Herrmann (Collection Latomus 44), Brussels: 88104.Google Scholar
Anglo, S. (2002) ‘Vegetius’ De re militari: The triumph of mediocrity’, Antiquaries Journal 82: 247–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anglo, S. (2005) Machiavelli: The First Century, Oxford.Google Scholar
Arnar, A. S. (1990) Encyclopedism from Pliny to Borges, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Asheri, A., Lloyd, A. and Corcella, A. (2007), A Commentary on Herodotus, Books I-IV, Oxford.Google Scholar
Asper, M. (1997) Onomata allotria: Zur Genese, Struktur und Funktion poetologischer Metaphern bei Kallimachos, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Asper, M. (2007) Griechische Wissenschaftstexte: Formen, Funktionen, Differenzierungsgeschichten, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Asper, M. (2011) ‘“Frame tales” in Ancient Greek science writing’, in Pohl, K.-H. and Wöhrle, G. (eds), Form und Gehalt in Texten der Griechischen und Chinesischen Philosophie, Stuttgart: 91112.Google Scholar
Asper, M. (ed.) (2013a) Writing Science: Mathematical and Medical Authorship in Ancient Greece, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asper, M. (2013b) ‘Introduction’, in Asper 2013a: 1–13.
Asper, M. (2013c) ‘Making up progress – in Ancient Greek science writing’, in Asper 2013a: 411–30.
Astbury, R. (ed.) (2002) M. Terentius Varro: Saturarum Menippearum Fragmenta (2nd edn), Munich.Google Scholar
Astin, A. E. (1978) Cato the Censor, Oxford.Google Scholar
Atherton, C. (ed.) (1998) Form and Content in Didactic Poetry, Bari.Google Scholar
Aubert, J.-J. (1994) Business Managers in Ancient Rome: A Social and Economic Study of Institores, 200 BC–AD 250, Leiden.Google Scholar
Aubert, J.-J. and Sirks, B. (eds) (2002) Speculum Iuris: Roman Law as a Reflection of Social and Economic Life in Antiquity, Ann Arbor, MI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baier, T. (1997) Werk und Wirkung Varros im Spiegel seiner Zeitgenossen, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Baldwin, B. (1963) ‘Columella's sources and how he used them’, Latomus 22: 785–91.Google Scholar
Baltussen, H. (ed.) (2013) Greek and Roman Consolations: Eight Studies of a Tradition and Its Afterlife, Swansea.Google Scholar
Baragwanath, E. (2008) Motivation and Narrative in Herodotus, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baragwanath, E. and de Bakker, M. (2012a) ‘Introduction: Myth, truth, and narrative in Herodotus’ Histories’, in Baragwanath and de Bakker 2012b: 1–56.
Baragwanath, E. and de Bakker, M. (eds) (2012b) Myth, Truth, and Narrative in Herodotus, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baraz, Y. (2012) A Written Republic: Cicero's Philosophical Politics, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Barker, A. (2007) The Science of Harmonics of Classical Greece, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, J. (1993) ‘Galen and the utility of logic’, in Kollesch, J. and Nickel, D. (eds), Galen und das hellenistische Erbe, Stuttgart: 3392.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (2003) ‘Proofs and syllogisms in Galen’, in Barnes and Jouanna 2003: 1–24.
Barnes, J. and Jouanna, J. (eds) (2003) Galien et la philosophie, Vandoeuvres-Geneva.Google Scholar
Baron, C. A. (2013) Timaeus of Tauromenium and Hellenistic Historiography, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Barthes, R. (1987) Writer Sollers (tr. Tody, P.), Minneapolis, MN.Google Scholar
Bartley, A. N. (2003) Stories from the Mountains, Stories from the Sea: The Digressions and Similes of Oppian's Halieutica and the Cynegetica, Göttingen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton, T. (1994a) Ancient Astrology, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton, T. (1994b) Power and Knowledge: Astrology, Physiognomics, and Medicine under the Roman Empire, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Bartsch, S. (2006) The Mirror of the Self: Sexuality, Self-Knowledge and the Gaze in the Early Roman Empire, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Bauman, R. A. (2000) Human Rights in Ancient Rome, London.Google Scholar
Beagon, M. (1992) Roman Nature: The Thought of Pliny the Elder, Oxford.Google Scholar
Beagon, M. (2013) ‘Labores pro bono publico: The burdensome mission of Pliny's Natural History’, in König and Woolf 2013: 84–107.
Beard, M. (1986) ‘Cicero and divination: The formation of a Latin discourse’, Journal of Roman Studies 76: 3346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beard, M. (2012) ‘Cicero's “Response of the haruspices” and the voice of the gods’, Journal of Roman Studies 102: 2039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beard, M. and North, J. (eds) (1990) Pagan Priests: Religion and Power in the Ancient World, London.Google Scholar
Beard, M., North, J. and Price, S. (1998) Religions of Rome (2 volumes), Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bekker-Nielsen, T. (2002) ‘Fish in the ancient economy’, in Ascani, K., Gabrielsen, V., Kvist, K. and Rasmussen, A. H. (eds), Ancient History Matters: Studies Presented to Jens Erik Skydsgaard on His Seventieth Birthday, Rome: 2937.Google Scholar
Bekker-Nielsen, T. (2006) ‘The technology and productivity of ancient sea-fishing’, in Bekker-Nielsen, T. (ed.), Ancient Fishing and Fish Processing in the Black Sea Region, Aarhus: 8395.Google Scholar
Bellemore, J. (1992) ‘The dating of Seneca's Ad Marciam De Consolatione’, Classical Quarterly 42: 219–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bendlin, A. (2000) ‘Looking beyond the civic compromise: Religious pluralism in late Republican Rome’, in Bispham, E. and Smith, C. (eds), Religion in Archaic and Republican Rome: Evidence and Experience, Edinburgh: 115–35, 167–71.Google Scholar
Bendz, G. (1938) Die Echtheitsfrage des vierten Buches der Frontinischen Strategemata, Lund.Google Scholar
Bergemann, C. (1992) Politik und Religion im spätrepublikanischen Rom, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Berggren, J. L. and Jones, A. (2000) Ptolemy's Geography: An Annotated Translation of the Theoretical Chapters, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Bernard, A. (2010) ‘The significance of Ptolemy's Almagest for its early readers’, Revue de Synthèse 131: 495521.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berryman, S. (2009) The Mechanical Hypothesis in Ancient Greek Natural Philosophy, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bettalli, M. (2010) ‘Il militare’, in Zecchini, G. (ed.), Lo storico antico: mestieri e figure sociali, Bari: 215–29.Google Scholar
Bing, P. (1988) The Well-Read Muse: Present and Past in Callimachus and the Hellenistic Poets, Göttingen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blank, D. L. (1998) Sextus Empiricus: Against the Grammarians, Oxford.Google Scholar
Blank, D. L. (2012) ‘Varro and Antiochus’, in Sedley, D. (ed.), The Philosophy of Antiochus, Cambridge: 250–89.Google Scholar
Blänsdorf, J. (1991) ‘“Augurenlächeln”: Ciceros Kritik an der römischen Mantik’, in Wißmann, H. (ed.), Zur Erschließung von Zukunft in den Religionen: Zukunftserwartung und Gegenwartsbewältigung in der Religionsgeschichte, Würzburg: 4565.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (1996) ‘Stoic syllogistic’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 14: 133–92.Google Scholar
Boll, F. (1903) Sphaera: Neue griechische Texte und Untersuchungen zur Geschichte der Sternbilder, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Bömer, F. (1969–86) P. Ovidius Naso: Metamorphosen, I–VI, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Boshnakov, K. (2004) Pseudo-Skymnos (Semos von Delos?), Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Bosman, P. R. (2012) ‘Lucian among the Cynics: The Zeus Refuted and Cynic tradition’, Classical Quarterly 62: 785–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosworth, A. B. (1993) ‘Arrian and Rome: The minor works’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II, 34(1): 253–64.Google Scholar
Boudon-Millot, V. (2009) ‘Galen's bios and methodos: From ways of life to paths of knowledge’, in Gill, Wilkins and Whitmarsh 2009: 175–89.
Boudon-Millot, V. and Jouanna, J. (2010) Galien: Ne pas se chagriner, Paris.Google Scholar
Boudon-Millot, V. and Pietrobelli, A. (2005) ‘Galien ressuscité: edition “princeps” du texte grec du De propriis placitis’, Revue des études grecques 118: 168213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1993) The Field of Cultural Production, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bowen, A. C. and Goldstein, B. R. (1988) ‘Meton of Athens and astronomy in the late fifth century B.C.’, in Leichty, E., Ellis, M. de J. and Gerardi, P. (eds), A Scientific Humanist: Studies in Memory of Abraham Sachs, Philadelphia, PA: 3981.Google Scholar
Bowersock, G. W. (1965) Augustus and the Greek World, Oxford.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. (1990) ‘Greek poetry in the Antonine age’, in Russell, D. A. (ed.), Antonine Literature, Oxford: 5390.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. (2004) ‘Denys d'Alexandrie: un poète grec dans l'empire romain’, Revue des études antiques 106: 177–85.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. (2006) ‘Portrait of the sophist as a young man’, in McGing, B. and Mossman, J. (eds), The Limits of Ancient Biography, Swansea: 141–53.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. (2013) ‘Libraries for the Caesars’, in König, Oikonomopoulou and Woolf 2013: 237–60.
Boylan, M. (1984) ‘The Galenic and Hippocratic challenges to Aristotle's conception theory’, Journal of the History of Biology 17: 83112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boys-Stones, G. (2013) ‘The Consolatio ad Apollonium: Therapy for the dead’, in Baltussen 2013: 123–37.
Brancacci, A. (2000) ‘Dio, Socrates and Cynicism’, in Swain 2000: 240–60.
Branham, R. B. (1989) Unruly Eloquence: Lucian and the Comedy of Traditions, Harvard, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braund, S. (2009) Seneca De Clementia: Edited with Translation and Commentary, Oxford.Google Scholar
Bremer, J. M. (1981) ‘Greek hymns’, in Versnel, H. S. (ed.), Faith, Hope and Worship: Aspects of Religious Mentality in the Ancient World, Leiden: 193215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briscoe, J. (2008) A Commentary on Livy: Books 38–40, Oxford.Google Scholar
Brisson, L., Congourdeau, M.-H. and Solère, J.-L. (eds) (2008) L'Embryon: formation et animation. Antiquité grecque et latine, traditions hébraïque, chrétienne et islamique, Paris.Google Scholar
Brodersen, K. (1994) Dionysios von Alexandria: Das Lied von der Welt, Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Bronkhorst, J. (2002) ‘Discipliné par le débat’, in Bansat-Boudon, L. and Scheid, J. (eds), Le Disciple et ses maîtres, Paris: 207–25.Google Scholar
Brooks, E. B. and Brooks, A. T. (1998) The Original Analects, New York.Google Scholar
Broughton, T. R. S. (1951–86) The Magistrates of the Roman Republic (3 volumes), New York.Google Scholar
Brown, D. (2000) Mesopotamian Planetary Astronomy-Astrology, Groningen.Google Scholar
Brown, P. (1978) The Making of Late Antiquity, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Brunt, P. A. (1972) ‘Cn. Tremelius Scrofa the agronomist’, Classical Review 86: 304–8.Google Scholar
Brunt, P. A. (1989) ‘Philosophy and religion in the late Republic’, in Griffin and Barnes 1989: 174–98.
Bryan, J. (2013) ‘Neronian philosophy’, in Buckley and Dinter 2013: 134–48.
Buckley, E. and Dinter, M. T. (eds) (2013) A Companion to the Neronian Age, Chichester.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burckhardt, L. A. (1988) Politische Strategien der Optimaten in der späten römischen Republik, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (2005) ‘Archytas and optics’, Science in Context 18: 3553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cam, M.-T., Liou, B. and Zuinghedau, M. (eds) (1995) Vitruvius: De l'architecture: Livre VII, Paris.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. (2004) Greek Mythography in the Roman World, New York.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. (2011) The Last Pagans of Rome, New York.Google Scholar
Campanile, D. (2005) ‘Il sofista allo specchio: Filostrato nelle Vitae Sophistarum’, Studi Ellenistici 16: 275–88.Google Scholar
Campbell, B. (1987) ‘Teach yourself how to be a general’, Journal of Roman Studies 77: 1329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, B. and Purcell, N. (1996) ‘Iulius Frontinus, Sextus’, in Hornblower, S. and Spawforth, A. (eds), The Oxford Classical Dictionary (3rd edition), Oxford: 785.Google Scholar
Cardauns, B. (ed.) (1960) Logistoricus über die Götterverehrung (Curio de cultu deorum) (with translation and commentary), Würzburg.Google Scholar
Cardauns, B. (ed.) (1976) M. Terentius Varro, Antiquitates Rerum Divinarum: I Die Fragmente; II Kommentar, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Cardauns, B. (2001) Marcus Terentius Varro: Einführung in sein Werk, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Carey, S. (2003) Pliny's Catalogue of Culture: Art and Empire in the Natural History, Oxford.Google Scholar
Carlsen, J. (1995) Vilici and Roman Estate Managers until AD 284, Rome.Google Scholar
Carvounis, K. and Hunter, R. (eds) (2008) ‘Signs of Life? Studies in Later Greek PoetryRamus 37(1–2).Google Scholar
Cavavero, A. (2002) ‘The envied Muse: Plato versus Homer’, in E. Spentzou and D. Fowler 2002: 47–67.
Cèbe, J.-P. (ed.) (1985) Varron, Satires ménippées, Vol. 7 (with translation and commentary), Rome.Google Scholar
Cèbe, J.-P. (ed.) (1999) Varron, Satires ménippées, Vol. 13 (with translation and commentary), Rome.Google Scholar
Chandler, C. (2006) Philodemus: On Rhetoric, Books 1 and 2, New York.Google Scholar
Charles, M. (2007) Vegetius in Context: Establishing the Date of the Epitoma Rei Militaris, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Chilton, H. W. (1971) Diogenes of Oenoanda: The Fragments, London.Google Scholar
Civiletti, M. (2002) Filostrato: Vite dei Sofisti, Milan.Google Scholar
Clark, H. (1990) The Fictional Encyclopedia: Joyce, Pound, Sollers, New York.Google Scholar
Clark, H. (1992) ‘Encyclopedic discourse’, SubStance 67: 95110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, K. (1997) ‘In search of the author of Strabo's Geography’, Journal of Roman Studies 87: 92110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, K. (1999) Between Geography and History: Hellenistic Constructions of the Roman World, Oxford.Google Scholar
Clauss, J. J. (2006) ‘Theriaca: Nicander's poem of the earth’, Studi italiani di filologia classica 4: 160–82.Google Scholar
Clay, D. (1992) ‘Lucian of Samosata: Four philosophical lives (Nigrinus, Demonax, Peregrinus, Alexander Pseudomantis)’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II, 36(5): 3406–50.Google Scholar
Cole, T. (1990) Democritus and the Sources of Greek Anthropology, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (1994) Genres and Readers: Lucretius, Love Elegy, Pliny's Encyclopedia (tr. Most, G.), Baltimore.Google Scholar
Corbeill, A. (2012) ‘Cicero and the Etruscan haruspices’, Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar 15: 243–66.Google Scholar
Corbeill, A. (2013) ‘Cicero and the intellectual milieu of the late Republic’, in Steel, C. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Cicero, Cambridge: 924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornell, T. (ed.) (2013) The Fragments of the Roman Historians (3 volumes), Oxford.Google Scholar
Costanza, S. (1991) ‘Motivi callimachei nel proemio dei Cynegetica di Oppiano d'Apamea’, in Studi di filologia classica in onore di Giusto Monaco, I: Letteratura greca, Palermo: 479–89.Google Scholar
Courrént, M. (2011) De architecti scientia: Idée de nature et théorie de l'art dans le De architectura de Vitruve, Caen.Google Scholar
Cramer, F. H. (1954) Astrology in Roman Law and Politics, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Cribiore, R. (2001) Gymnastics of the Mind: Greek Education in Hellenistic and Roman Egypt, Princeton, NJ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crook, J. (1995) Legal Advocacy in the Roman World, London.Google Scholar
Crowther, N. B. (1992) ‘Second-place finishes and lower in Greek athletics (including the pentathlon)’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 90: 97102 (reprinted in Crowther 2004).Google Scholar
Crowther, N. B. (2000) ‘Resolving an impasse: Draws, dead heats, and similar decisions in Greek athletics’, Nikephoros 13: 125–40 (reprinted in Crowther 2004).Google Scholar
Crowther, N. B. (2004) Athletika: Studies on the Olympic Games and Greek Athletics, Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Cuomo, S. (2000) Pappus of Alexandria and the Mathematics of Late Antiquity, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cuomo, S. (2001) Ancient Mathematics, London.Google Scholar
Cuomo, S. (2007a) ‘Measures for an emperor: Volusius Maecianus’ monetary pamphlet for Marcus Aurelius’, in König and Whitmarsh 2007b: 206–28.
Cuomo, S. (2007b) Technology and Culture in Greek and Roman Antiquity, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cuomo, S. (2011) ‘Skills and virtues in Vitruvius’ Book 10’, in Formisano and Böhme 2011: 309–32.
Cuypers, M. (2004) ‘Prince and principle: The philosophy of Callimachus’ Hymn to Zeus’, in Harder, M. A., Regtuit, R. F. and Wakker, G. C. (eds), Callimachus II (Hellenistica Groningana 7), Leuven: 95115.Google Scholar
Dalle Vedove, E. (2009) ‘Aspetti della presenza del dedicatario nel De beneficiis di Seneca e raffronto con le prefazioni di Seneca Padre’, in Picone, G., Beltrami, L. and Ricottilli, L. (eds), Benefattori e beneficati: La relazione asimmetrica nel De beneficiis di Seneca, Palermo: 97120.Google Scholar
Dalzell, A. (1996) The Criticism of Didactic Poetry, Toronto.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
d'Assigny, M. (1686) The Stratagems of War, or, A Collection of the Most Celebrated Practices and Wise Sayings of the Great Generals in Former Ages Written by Sextus Julius Frontinus, One of the Roman Consuls; Now English'd, London.Google Scholar
De George, R. T. (1985) The Nature and Limits of Authority, Lawrence, KS.Google Scholar
De Jong, I. (2001) A Narratological Commentary on the Odyssey, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Jong, I., Nünlist, R. and Bowie, A. (eds) (2004) Narrators, Narratees, and Narratives in Ancient Greek Literature, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Jonge, C. (2005a) ‘Dionysius of Halicarnassus and the method of metathesis’, Classical Quarterly 55: 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Jonge, C. (2005b) ‘Dionysius of Halicarnassus as a historian of linguistics: The history of the “parts of speech” in De compositione verborum 2’, Henry Sweet Bulletin 44: 518.Google Scholar
De Jonge, C. (2008) Between Grammar and Rhetoric: Dionysius of Halicarnassus on Language, Linguistics and Literature, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Lacy, P. (1972) ‘Galen's Platonism’, American Journal of Philology 93: 2739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Lacy, P. (ed.) (1992) Galen: On Semen (CMG 5.3.1), Berlin.Google Scholar
De Lacy, P. (ed.) (2005) Galen: On the Doctrines of Hippocrates and Plato (3 volumes) (3rd edn) (CMG 5.4.1.2), Berlin.Google Scholar
De Libero, L. (1992) Obstruktion: Politische Praktiken im Senat und in der Volksversammlung der ausgehenden römischen Republik (70–49 v.Chr.), Stuttgart.Google Scholar
De Pizan, C. (1999) The Book of Deeds of Arms and of Chivalry (tr. Willard, S., ed. Willard, C. C.), Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
De Ste. Croix, G. E. M. (1981) The Class Struggle in the Ancient Greek World, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Dean-Jones, L. (2003) ‘Written texts and the rise of the charlatan in ancient Greek medicine’, in Yunis, H. (ed.), Writing into Culture: Written Text and Cultural Practice in Ancient Greece, Cambridge: 97121.Google Scholar
Dear, P. (1995) Discipline and Experience: The Mathematical Way in the Scientific Revolution, Chicago, IL.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debru, A. (1991) ‘Expérience, plausibilité et certitude chez Galien’, in López Férez 1991: 31–40.
Delbrück, H. (1975–85) History of the Art of War within the Framework of Political History (4 volumes) (translated from the German by Renfroe, Walter J. Jr.), Westport, CT.Google Scholar
Delcourt, A. (2005) Lecture des Antiquités romaines de Denys d'Halicarnasse: Un historien entre deux mondes, Brussels.Google Scholar
Della Casa, A. (1962) Nigidio Figulo, Rome.Google Scholar
Denyer, N. (1985) ‘The case against divination: An examination of Cicero's De divinatione’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 31: 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Detienne, M. (1996) The Masters of Truth in Archaic Greece, New York.Google Scholar
Devillers, O. and Krings, V. (1996) ‘Autour de l'agronome Magon’, in Khanoussi, M., Ruggeri, P. and Vismara, C. (eds), L'Africa romana: Atti dell’ XI Convegno di Studio, Cartagine, 15–18 dicembre 1994, Ozieri: 489516.Google Scholar
Devine, A. M. (1989) ‘Aelian's manual of Hellenistic military tactics: A new translation from the Greek with an introduction’, The Ancient World 19: 31–9.Google Scholar
Dicks, D. R. (1971) ‘Euctemon’, in Gillespie 1970–90: 4.459–60.
Diederich, S. (2007) Römische Agrarhandbücher zwischen Fachwissenschaft, Literatur und Ideologie, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dihle, A. (1996) ‘Die Theologia tripertita bei Augustin’, in Cancik, H., Lichtenberger, H. and Schäfer, P. (eds), Geschichte-Tradition-Reflexion: Festschrift für Martin Hengel zum 70. Geburtstag, Tübingen: 183202.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. (1993) Alcinous: The Handbook of Platonism, Oxford.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. N. (2012) The Justice of Constantine: Law, Communication and Control, Ann Arbor, MI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobbin, R. (1998) Epictetus: Discourses Book 1, Oxford.Google Scholar
Dodds, E. R. (1963) Proclus: The Elements of Theology, Oxford.Google Scholar
Domenici, I. and Maderna, E. (2007) Giovanni Lido: Sui segni celesti, Milan.Google Scholar
Domenicucci, P. (2003) ‘La previsione astrologica attribuita a Nigidio Figulo in Luc. I, 639–70’, Schol(ia) 5(3): 85106.Google Scholar
Donini, P. (2008), ‘Galen's Psychology’, in Hankinson 2008b: 184–209.
Doody, A. (2007) ‘Virgil the farmer? Critiques of the Georgics in Columella and Pliny’, Classical Philology 102: 180–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doody, A., Föllinger, S. and Taub, L. (2012) ‘Structures and strategies in ancient Greek and Roman technical writing’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, Special Issue 43(2): 233–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Ooge, M. L. (1926) Nicomachus of Gerasa: Introduction to Arithmetic (tr. with studies in Greek arithmetic by Robbins, F. E. and Karpinski, L. C.), New York.Google Scholar
Dougherty, C. (2001) The Raft of Odysseus: The Ethnographic Imagination of Homer's Odyssey, Oxford.Google Scholar
Drake, S. (1957) Discoveries and Opinions of Galileo, New York.Google Scholar
Du Plessis, P. J. (ed.) (2013) New Frontiers: Law and Society in the Roman World, Edinburgh.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ducatillon, J. (1977) Polemique dans la collection hippocratique, Paris.Google Scholar
Dueck, D. (2000) Strabo of Amaseia: A Greek Man of Letters in Augustan Rome, London.Google Scholar
Dumont, J. C. (1986) ‘Quelques aspects de l'esclavage et de l’économie agraire chez Pline’, Helmantica 37: 293306.Google Scholar
Duncan-Jones, R. P. (1963) ‘Wealth and munificence in Roman Africa’, Papers of the British School at Rome 31: 159–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyck, A. R. (2004) A Commentary on Cicero, De Legibus, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Eck, W. (1982) ‘Die Gestalt Frontinus in ihrer politischen and sozialen Umwelt’, in Frontinus-Gesellschaft, (ed.), Wasserversorgung im Antiken Rom, Vol. I: Sextus Julius Frontinus, Curator Aquarum, Munich.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. (1996) Writing Rome: Textual Approaches to the City, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. (1997) ‘Self-scrutiny and self-transformation in Seneca's Letters’, Greece and Rome 44: 2338 (reprinted in Fitch 2008: 84–101).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Effe, B. (1977) Dichtung und Lehre: Untersuchungen zur Typologie des antiken Lehrgedichts, Munich.Google Scholar
Einarson, B. (1936) ‘On certain mathematical terms in Aristotle's logic’, American Journal of Philology 57: 3354, 151–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elderkin, G. (1935) ‘Two mosaics representing the Seven Wise Men’, American Journal of Archaeology 39: 92111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elm, D. (2003) ‘Die Kontroverse über die “Sondergötter”: ein Beitrag zur Rezeptions- und Wirkungsgeschichte des Handbuches Religion und Kultus der Römer von Georg Wissowa’, Archiv für Religionsgeschichte 5: 6779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engels, D. (2007) Das römische Vorzeichenwesen (753–27 v.Chr.): Quellen, Terminologie, Kommentar, historische Entwicklung, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Engels, J. (2013) ‘Agias and Derkylos (305)’, in Brill's New Jacoby (Brill Online).
Eramo, I. (2010) Discorsi di guerra, Bari.Google Scholar
Erdkamp, P. (1999) ‘Agriculture, underemployment and the cost of rural labour in the Roman world’, Classical Quarterly 49: 556–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erren, M. (1958) ‘ΑΣΤΕΡΕΣ ΑΝΩΝΥΜΟΙ (Zu Arat 367–385)’, Hermes 86: 240–3.Google Scholar
Eshleman, K. (2012) The Social World of Intellectuals in the Roman Empire: Sophists, Philosophers and Christians, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, J. and Berggren, J. L. (2006) Geminos's Introduction to the Phenomena: A Translation and Study of a Hellenistic Survey of Astronomy, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Fajen, F. (1999) Oppianus Halieutica: Der Fischfang, Stuttgart.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fales, F. M. and Postgate, J. N. (1992) Imperial Administrative Records, Part I: Palace and Temple Administration (State Archives of Assyria 7), Helsinki.Google Scholar
Fantar, M. H. (1998) ‘De l'agriculture à Carthage’, in Khanoussi, M., Ruggeri, P. and Vismara, C. (eds), L'Africa romana: Atti del XII Convegno di Studio, Olbia, 12–15 dicembre 1996, Sassari: 113–21.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (2002) ‘Ovid's Fasti: Politics, history, and religion’, in Boyd, B. W. (ed.), Brill's Companion to Ovid, Leiden: 197233.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (2004) The Roman World of Cicero's De oratore, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fantuzzi, M. and Hunter, R. (2004) Tradition and Innovation in Hellenistic Poetry, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. (1998) Literature and Religion at Rome: Cultures, Contexts, and Beliefs, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Feke, J. (2009) ‘Ptolemy in Philosophical Context: A Study of the Relationships between Physics, Mathematics, and Theology’ (PhD diss., University of Toronto).
Feke, J. (2012) ‘Ptolemy's defense of theoretical philosophy’, Apeiron 45: 6190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitch, J. G. (ed.) (2008) Seneca, Oxford.Google Scholar
Flach, D. (ed.) (2002) Marcus Terentius Varro, Gespräche über die Landwirtschaft, Buch 3, Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Fögen, T. (ed.) (2005) Antike Fachtexte: Ancient Technical Texts, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fögen, T. (2009) Wissen, Kommunikation und Selbstdarstellung: Zur Struktur und Charakteristik römischer Fachtexte der frühen Kaiserzeit, Munich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, A. (1992) Homer: The Poetry of the Past, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Ford, A. (2002) The Origins of Criticism: Literary Culture and Poetic Theory in Classical Greece, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Forhan, K. (2002) The Political Theory of Christine de Pizan, Burlington, VT.Google Scholar
Formisano, M. (2001) Tecnica e scrittura: Le letterature tecnico-scientifiche nello spazio letterario tardolatino, Rome.Google Scholar
Formisano, M. (2002) ‘Strategie da manual. L'arte della guerra, Vegezio e Machiavelli’, Quaderni di Storia 55: 99127.Google Scholar
Formisano, M. (2009) ‘The Renaissance tradition of the ancient art of war’, in Beltramini, G. (ed.), Andrea Palladio and the Architecture of Battle, Venice: 226–39.Google Scholar
Formisano, M. (2011) ‘The Strategikós of Onasander: Taking military texts seriously’, Technai 2: 3952.Google Scholar
Formisano, M. (2012) ‘Review of Allmand 2011’, Bryn Mawr Classical Review 2012.11.59.
Formisano, M. (2014) ‘Kriegskunst’, in Landfester, M. (ed.), Renaissance-Humanismus: Lexikon zur Antikerezeption (Der Neue Pauly, Supplemente 9), Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Formisano, M. and Böhme, H. (eds) (2011) War in Words: Transformations of War from Antiquity to Clausewitz, Berlin.Google Scholar
Formisano, M. and van der Eijk, P. (eds) (2017) Knowledge, Text and Practice in Ancient Technical Writing, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, D. P. (2000) ‘The didactic plot’, in Depew, M. and Obbink, D. (eds), Matrices of Genre: Authors, Canons, and Society, Cambridge, MA: 205–19.Google Scholar
Fox, M. (1993) ‘History and rhetoric in Dionysius of Halicarnassus’, Journal of Roman Studies 83: 3147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, M. (1996) Roman Historical Myths: The Regal Period in Augustan Literature, Oxford.Google Scholar
Fox, M. (2001) ‘Dionysius, Lucian, and the prejudice against rhetoric in history’, Journal of Roman Studies 91: 7693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foxhall, L. (1990) ‘The dependent tenant: Land leasing and labour in Italy and Greece’, Journal of Roman Studies 80: 97114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frakes, R. M. (2011) Compiling the Collatio Legum Mosaicarum et Romanarum in Late Antiquity (Oxford Studies in Roman Law and Society 2), Oxford.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (2003) ‘Galen's theology’, in Barnes and Jouanna 2003: 73–106.
Frischer, B. (1982) The Sculpted Word: Epicureanism and Philosophical Recruitment in Ancient Greece, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Frischer, B. (1991) Shifting Paradigms: New Approaches to Horace's Ars poetica, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
Fromentin, V. (1988) ‘L'attitude critique de Denys d'Halicarnasse face aux mythes’, Bulletin de l'Association Guillaume Budé 1988: 318–26.
Fromentin, V. (1993) ‘La définition de l'histoire comme mélange dans le prologue des Antiquités Romaines de Denys d'Halicarnasse (I, 8 3)’, in Les Actes du IIe colloque sur Denys d'Halicarnasse historien (Pallas 39): 177–92.
Fromentin, V. (1998) Denys d'Halicarnasse: Antiquités Romaines, Livre I (with introduction and commentary), Paris.Google Scholar
Fromentin, V. (2006) ‘Denys d'Halicarnasse et Hérodote III, 80–82 ou comment choisir la meilleure constitution pour Rome?’, in Le Monde et les mots: Mélanges Germaine Aujac (Pallas 72): 229–42.
Fromentin, V. (2010) ‘Les Moi de l'historien: récit et discours chez Denys d'Halicarnasse’, in Guelfucci, M.-R. (ed.), Jeux et enjeux de la mise en forme de l'histoire: recherches sur le genre historique en Grèce et à Rome (Dialogues d'histoire ancienne Suppl. 4), Besançon: 261–77.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, M. (1960) Das systematische Lehrbuch: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der Wissenschaften in der Antike, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Gabba, E. (1984) ‘Dionigi, Varrone e la religione senza miti’, Rivista storica italiana 96: 855–70.Google Scholar
Gabba, E. (1991) Dionysius and the History of Archaic Rome, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Galimberti, A. (2002) ‘Lo Strategikós di Onasandro’, in Sordi, M. (ed.), Guerra e diritto nel mondo greco e romano, Milan: 141–54.Google Scholar
Gallia, A. B. (2012) Remembering the Roman Republic: Culture, Politics, and History under the Principate, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Garnett, R. (1895) ‘On the date of the Ἀποτελεσματικά of Manetho’, Journal of Philology 23: 238–40.Google Scholar
Garrett, A. V. (2003) Meaning in Spinoza's Method, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauthier, P. (1985) Les cités grecques et leur bienfaiteurs, Paris.Google Scholar
Geertman, H. and De Jong, J. J. (eds) (1989) Munus non ingratum: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Vitruvius’ De architectura and the Hellenistic and Republican Architecture, Leiden 20–23 January 1987, Leiden.Google Scholar
Gehrke, H.-J. (1998) ‘Die Geburt der Erdkunde aus dem Geiste der Geometrie: Überlegungen zur Entstehung und zur Frühgeschichte der wissenschaftlichen Geographie bei den Griechen’, in Kullmann, Althoff and Asper 1998: 163–92.
Geller, M. (2010) Ancient Babylonian Medicine, Chichester.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerson, J. (1960) Oeuvres complètes, Vol. 2 (ed. Glorieux, P.), Paris.Google Scholar
Getty, R. J. (1941) ‘The astrology of P. Nigidius Figulus (Lucan I, 649–65)’, Classical Quarterly 35: 1722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Getty, R. J. (1960) ‘Neopythagoreanism and mathematical symmetry in Lucan, De bello civili 1’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 91: 310–23.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. (1997) ‘Didactic poetry as “popular” form’, in Atherton, C. (ed.), Form and Content in Didactic Poetry, Bari: 6798.Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I. (2011) Creative Eloquence: The Construction of Reality in Cicero's Speeches, Oxford.Google Scholar
Gill, C. (2010) Naturalistic Psychology in Galen and Stoicism, Oxford.Google Scholar
Gill, C., Whitmarsh, T. and Wilkins, J. (eds) (2009) Galen and the World of Knowledge, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, C. C. (ed.) (1970–90) Dictionary of Scientific Biography (18 volumes), New York.Google Scholar
Gilliver, C. (2007) ‘Battle’, in Sabin, Van Wees and Whitby 2007: 122–57.
Gilmartin, K. (1975) ‘A rhetorical figure in Latin historical style: The imaginary second person singular’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 104: 99121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giuffré, V. (1974) La letteratura ‘de re militari’: appunti per una storia degli ordinamenti militari, Naples.Google Scholar
Gleason, M. (1995) Making Men: Sophists and Self-Presentation in Ancient Rome, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Glinister, F. (2007) ‘Constructing the past’, in Glinister and Woods 2007: 1–9.
Glinister, F. and Woods, C. (eds) (2007) Verrius, Festus and Paul: Lexicography, Scholarship, and Society, London.Google Scholar
Goar, R. J. (1968) ‘The purpose of De divinatione’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 99: 241–8.Google Scholar
Goar, R. J. (1972) Cicero and the State Religion, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (2002) The Invention of Prose, Oxford.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (2006) ‘Artemis and cultural identity in empire culture: How to think about polytheism, now?’, in Konstan, D. and Saïd, S. (eds), Greeks on Greekness: Viewing the Greek Past under the Roman Empire, Cambridge: 112–61.Google Scholar
Goldstein, B. R. (2007) ‘What's new in Ptolemy's Almagest?’, Nuncius 22: 261–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, B. R. and Bowen, A. C. (1991) ‘The introduction of dated observations and precise measurement in Greek astronomy’, Archive for History of Exact Sciences 43: 93132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodchild, H. and Witcher, R. E. (2010) ‘Modelling the agricultural landscapes of Republican Italy’, in Carlsen, J. and Lo Cascio, E. (eds), Agricoltura e scambi nell'Italia tardo-repubblicana, Rome: 187220.Google Scholar
Goodyear, F. R. D. (1982) ‘Technical writing’, in Kenney, E. J. (ed.), The Cambridge History of Classical Literature, Vol. 2: Latin Literature, Cambridge: 667–73.Google Scholar
Gordley, M. E. (2011) Teaching through Song in Antiquity, Tübingen.Google Scholar
Gordon, R. (1990) ‘The veil of power: Emperors, sacrificers and benefactors’, in Beard and North 1990: 199–231.
Görler, W. (1995) ‘Silencing the troublemaker: De Legibus I. 39 and the continuity of Cicero's scepticism’, in Powell, J. G. F. (ed.), Cicero the Philosopher: Twelve Papers, Oxford: 85113.Google Scholar
Grafton, A. and Williams, M. (2006) Christianity and the Transformation of the Book: Origen, Eusebius and the Library of Caesarea, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, A. C. (1989) Disputers of the Tao, La Salle, IL.Google Scholar
Gray, V. (2012) ‘Herodotus on Melampus’, in Baragwanath and de Bakker 2012b: 167–91.
Graziosi, B. (2001) ‘Competition in wisdom’, in Budelmann, F. and Michelakis, P. (eds), Homer, Tragedy and Beyond: Essays in Honour of P. E. Easterling, London: 5774.Google Scholar
Green, C. M. C. (1997) ‘Free as a bird: Varro De re rustica 3’, American Journal of Philology 118: 427–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, C. M. C. (2002) ‘Varro's three theologies and their influence on the Fasti’, in Herbert-Brown, G. (ed.), Ovid's Fasti: Historical Readings at its Bimillennium, Oxford: 7199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, P. (2006) Diodorus Siculus: Books 11–12.37.1, Austin, TX.Google Scholar
Green, S. J. (2014) Disclosure and Discretion in Roman Astrology: Manilius and his Augustan Contemporaries, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, J. and Kehoe, D. P. (1995) ‘Mago the Carthaginian’, in Fantar, M. and Ghakhi, M. (eds), Actes du IIIe Congrès International des Études Phéniciennes et Puniques, Tunis: 110–17.Google Scholar
Greene, K. (2000) ‘Technological innovation and economic progress in the ancient world: M. I. Finley re-considered’, Economic History Review 53: 2959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, A. F. and Tuckett, C. M. (eds) (2005) Trajectories through the New Testament and the Apostolic Fathers, Oxford.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. T. (1976) Seneca: A Philosopher in Politics, Oxford.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. T. (1989) ‘Philosophy, politics and politicians at Rome’, in Griffin and Barnes 1989: 1–37.
Griffin, M. T. (1995) ‘Philosophical badinage in Cicero's letters to his friends’, in Powell, J. G. F. (ed.), Cicero the Philosopher, Oxford: 325–46.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. T. (2007) ‘Seneca's pedagogic strategy: Letters and De beneficiis’, in Sorabji, R. and Sharples, R. (eds), Greek and Roman Philosophy 100 BC–200 AD, Vol. 1, London: 89113.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. T. (2013) Seneca on Society: A Guide to De Beneficiis, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, M. T. and Barnes, J. (eds) (1989) Philosophia Togata: Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society, Oxford.Google Scholar
Grimal, P. (1965–66) ‘Encyclopédies antiques’, Cahiers d'histoire mondiale 9: 459–82.Google Scholar
Gros, P. (1989) ‘L'auctoritas chez Vitruve: Contribution a l’étude de la sémantique des ordres dans le De Architectura’, in Geertman and De Jong 1989: 126–33.
Gros, P. (1994) ‘Munus non ingratum: le traité vitruvien et la notion de service’, in Gros, P., Le projet de Vitruve: objet, déstinataires et reception du De architectura, Rome: 7590.Google Scholar
Gross, A. (1996) The Rhetoric of Science, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Gross, A. (2006) Starring the Text: The Place of Rhetoric in Science Studies, Carbondale, IL.Google Scholar
Guillaumont, F. (1984) Philosophe et augure: Recherches sur la théorie cicéronienne de la divination, Brussels.Google Scholar
Guittard, C. (2003) ‘Les calendriers brontoscopiques dans le monde étrusco-romain’, in Cusset, C. (ed.), La Météorologie dans l'antiquité: Entre science et croyance, Saint-Étienne: 455–66.Google Scholar
Gunderson, E. (ed.) (2009) The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Rhetoric, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habinek, T. and Schiesaro, A. (eds) (1997) The Roman Cultural Revolution, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hagendahl, H. (1967) Augustine and the Latin Classics, Göteborg.Google Scholar
Hahn, J. (1991) ‘Plinius und die griechischen Ärzte in Rom: Naturkonzeption und Medizinkritik in der Naturalis Historia’, Sudhoffs Archiv 75: 209–39.Google Scholar
Hale, J. R. (1988) ‘A humanistic visual aid: The military diagram in the Renaissance’, Renaissance Studies 2: 280–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, N. T., Swerdlow, N. M. and Toomer, G. J. (1987) ‘The “Canobic Inscription”: Ptolemy's earliest work’, in Berggren, J. L. and Goldstein, B. R. (eds), From Ancient Omens to Statistical Mechanics, Copenhagen: 5573.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (1991a) On the Therapeutic Method: Books One and Two, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (1991b) ‘Galen on the foundations of science’, in López Férez 1991: 15–29.
Hankinson, R. J. (1994) ‘Galen's concept of scientific progress’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II, 37(2): 1775–89.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (1998) Galen: On Antecedent Causes, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (2003) ‘Causation in Galen’, in Barnes, and Jouanna, 2003: 3172.
Hankinson, R. J. (2005a) ‘Prédiction, prophétie, prognostic: la gnoséologie de l'avenir dans la divination et la medicine antique’, in Kany-Turpin, R. (ed.), Signes et prédiction dans l'antiquité, Saint-Etienne: 147–62.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (2005b) ‘Aristotle on kind-crossing’, in Sharples 2005: 23–54.
Hankinson, R. J. (2008a) ‘Galen's epistemology’, in Hankinson 2008b: 157–83.
Hankinson, R. J. (ed.) (2008b) The Cambridge Companion to Galen. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (2009) ‘Galen on the limitations of knowledge’, in Gill, Whitmarsh and Wilkins 2009: 206–42.
Hannah, R. (1996) ‘Lucan Bellum civile 1.649–65: The astrology of P. Nigidius Figulus revisited’, Papers of the Leeds International Latin Seminar 9: 175–90.Google Scholar
Hannah, R. (2001) ‘From orality to literacy? The case of the parapegmata’, in Watson, J. (ed.), Speaking Volumes: Orality and Literacy in the Greek and Roman World, Leiden: 139–59.Google Scholar
Hannah, R. (2002) ‘Euctemon's parapêgma’, in Tuplin and Rihll 2002: 112–32.
Harder, M. A., Regtuit, R. F. and Wakker, G. C. (eds) (2006) Beyond the Canon (Hellenistica Groningana 11), Leuven.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. (1992) ‘Plutarch and the interpretation of myth’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II, 33(6): 4743–87.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. (2015) Ovidio: Metamorfosi, Vol. 6, Milan.Google Scholar
Harkness, D. (2007) The Jewel House: Victorian London and the Scientific Revolution, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Harper, D. (1998) Early Chinese Medical Literature: The Mawangdui Manuscripts, London.Google Scholar
Harries, J. (2006) Cicero and the Jurists: From Citizens’ Law to the Lawful State, London.Google Scholar
Harries, J. (2013) ‘Encyclopaedias and autocracy: Justinian's encyclopaedia of Roman law’, in König and Woolf 2013: 178–96.
Harris, W. V. (1971) Rome in Etruria and Umbria, Oxford.Google Scholar
Harris, W. V. (1989) Ancient Literacy, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Harris-McCoy, D. (2008a) ‘Varieties of Encyclopedism in the Early Roman Empire: Vitruvius, Pliny the Elder, Artemidorus’ (PhD Diss., University of Pennsylvania).
Harris-McCoy, D. (2008b) ‘Jason König and Tim Whitmarsh, Ordering Knowledge in the Roman Empire’, Bryn Mawr Classical Review 2008.10.39.
Harris-McCoy, D. (2012) Artemidorus’ Oneirocritica: Text, Translation, and Commentary, Oxford.Google Scholar
Harris-McCoy, D. (2013) ‘Artemidorus’ Oneirocritica as fragmentary encyclopedia’, in König and Woolf 2013: 154–77.
Harrison, S. J. (2000) Apuleius: A Latin Sophist, Oxford.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J., Hilton, J. and Hunink, V. (2001) Apuleius: Rhetorical Works, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hawking, S. (1988) A Brief History of Time, New York.Google Scholar
Healy, L. and Hoyles, C. (2000) ‘A study of proof conceptions in algebra’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 31: 396428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, M. (2004) Menander: A Rhetor in Context, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heiberg, J. L. (1891–93) Apollonii Pergaei quae Graece exstant opera, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Heiberg, J. L. (1898–1907) Claudii Ptolemaei opera quae exstant omnia, Vol. 1: Syntaxis mathematica; Vol. 2: Opera astronomica minora, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Heiberg, J. L. and Stamatis, E. (1915) Commentarii in libros de sphaera et cylindro, Vol. 3: Archimedis opera omnia cum commentariis Eutocii, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Heinimann, F. (1961) ‘Eine vorplatonischen Theorie der Techne’, Museum Helveticum 18: 105–30.Google Scholar
Helm, R. (1956) Die Chronik des Hieronymus = Hieronymi Chronicon (GCS 47), Berlin.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. (2002) ‘Columella's living hedge: The Roman gardening book’, Journal of Roman Studies 92: 110–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, J. (2004) Morals and Villas in Seneca's Letters: Places to Dwell, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hense, O. (1905) C. Musonii Rufi reliquiae, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Hesk, J. (2007) ‘Combative capping in Aristophanic comedy’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 53: 124–60.Google Scholar
Heurgon, J. (1976) ‘L'agronome carthaginois Magon et ses traducteurs en latin et en grec’, Comptes rendus de l'Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres 120: 441–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heurgon, J. (1978) Varron: Économie rurale, Livre 1, Paris.Google Scholar
Heuser, B. (2007) ‘Introduction’, in Clausewitz, C. von, On War, Oxford: viixxxviii.Google Scholar
Heuser, B. (2010) The Evolution of Strategy: Thinking War from Antiquity to the Present, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hidber, T. (ed.) (1996) Das klassizistische Manifest des Dionys von Halikarnass: Die praefatio zu De oratoribus veteribus (with translation and commentary), Stuttgart.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hidber, T. (2011) ‘Impacts of writing in Rome: Greek perceptions of Roman literature in the first century BCE’, in Schmitz and Wiater 2011: 115–23.
Highet, G. (1962) The Anatomy of Satire, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. (1998) Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hine, H. M. (2006) ‘Rome, the cosmos, and the emperor in Seneca's Natural Questions’, Journal of Roman Studies 96: 4272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hine, H. M. (2009) ‘Subjectivity and objectivity in Latin scientific and technical literature’, in Taub and Doody 2009: 13–30.
Hine, H. M. (2010) ‘Form and function of speech in the prose works of the younger Seneca’, in Berry, D. H. and Erskine, A. (eds), Form and Function in Roman Oratory, Cambridge: 208–24.Google Scholar
Hine, H. M. (2016) ‘Philosophy and philosophi from Cicero to Apuleius’, in Williams and Volk 2016: 13–29.
Hirzel, R. (1895) Der Dialog: Ein literarhistorischer Versuch (2 volumes), Leipzig.Google Scholar
Hobden, F. and Tuplin, C. (eds) (2012) Xenophon: Ethical Principles and Historical Enquiry, Leiden.Google Scholar
Hon, G. (1989) ‘Is there a concept of experimental error in Greek astronomy?’, British Journal for the History of Science 22: 129–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honigman, S. (2003) The Septuagint and Homeric Scholarship in Alexandria: A Study in the Narrative of the Letter of Aristeas, London.Google Scholar
Honoré, T. (1978) Tribonian, London.Google Scholar
Honoré, T. (1994) Emperors and Lawyers (2nd edn), Oxford.Google Scholar
Honoré, T. (2002) Ulpian: Pioneer of Human Rights (2nd edn), Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honoré, T. (2010) Justinian's Digest: Character and Compilation, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkinson, N. (1994) Greek Poetry of the Imperial Period: An Anthology, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Horster, M. (2008) ‘Some notes on grammarians in Plutarch’, in Nikolaidis, A. G. (ed.), The Unity of Plutarch's Work: ‘Moralia’ Themes in the ‘Lives’, Features of the ‘Lives’ in the ‘Moralia’, Berlin: 611–24.Google Scholar
Horster, M. and Reitz, C. (eds) (2003) Antike Fachschriftsteller: Literarischer Diskurs und sozialer Kontext, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Housman, A. E. (1926) M. Annaei Lucani Belli Civilis libri decem, Oxford.Google Scholar
Howe, N. (1985) ‘In defense of the encyclopedic mode: On Pliny's preface to the Natural History’, Latomus 44: 561–76.Google Scholar
Howley, J. (2013) ‘Why read the jurists? Aulus Gellius on reading across disciplines’, in Du Plessis 2013: 9–30.
Hsu, E. (2010) Pulse Diagnosis in Early Chinese Medicine: The Telling Touch, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Humfress, C. (2005) ‘Law and legal practice in the age of Justinian’, in Maas, M. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Justinian, Cambridge: 161–84.Google Scholar
Humphreys, S. C. (1975) ‘Transcendence and intellectual roles: The ancient Greek case’, Daedalus 104: 91118.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (1995) ‘Written in the stars: Poetry and philosophy in the Phainomena of Aratus’, Arachnion 2: 134.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (2004a) ‘Epic in a minor key’, in Fantuzzi and Hunter 2004: 191–245.
Hunter, R. (2004b) ‘The Periegesis of Dionysius and the traditions of Hellenistic poetry’, Revue des études antiques 106: 217–31.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (2006) ‘The Prologue of the Periodos to Nicomedes (“Pseudo-Scymnus”)’, in Harder, Regtuit and Wakker 2006: 123–40.
Hunter, R. (2012) Plato and the Traditions of Ancient Literature: The Silent Stream, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, R. (2014) Hesiodic Voices: Studies in the Ancient Reception of Hesiod's Works and Days, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. (2009) ‘Read the instructions: Didactic poetry and didactic prose’, Classical Quarterly 59: 196211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ierodiakonou, K. (2002) ‘Aristotle's use of examples in the Prior Analytics’, Phronesis 47: 127–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inwood, B. (1995) ‘Seneca in his philosophical milieu’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 97: 6376 (reprinted in B. Inwood (2005) Reading Seneca: Stoic Philosophy at Rome, Oxford: 7–22).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacob, C. (1981) ‘L’œil et la mémoire: sur la Périégèse de la Terre habitée de Denys’, in Jacob, C. and Lestringant, F. (eds), Arts et légendes d'espaces: figures du voyage et rhétoriques du monde, Paris: 2197.Google Scholar
Jacob, C. (1990) La Description de la terre habitée de Denys d'Alexandrie ou la leçon de géographie, Paris.Google Scholar
Jacob, C. (1991) ‘Θεὸς Ἑρμῆς ἐπὶ Ἁδριανοῦ: la mise en scène du pouvoir impérial dans la Description de la terre habitée de Denys d'Alexandrie’, Cahiers du Centre Gustave Glotz 2: 4353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacques, J.-M. (2007) Nicandre, Œuvres, Vol. 3: Les Alexipharmaques, Paris.Google Scholar
Jaeger, M. (2008) Archimedes and the Roman Imagination, Ann Arbor, MI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jal, P. (1961) ‘La propagande religieuse à Rome au cours des guerres civiles de la fin de la république’, Antiquité classique 30: 395414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janniard, S. (2008) ‘Végèce et les transformations de l'art de la guerre aux IVe et Ve siècles après J.-C.’, Antiquité tardive 16: 1936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janson, T. (1964) Latin Prose Prefaces: Studies in Literary Conventions, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. (1982) ‘Varro's Antiquitates rerum divinarum and religious affairs in the late Roman Republic’, Bulletin of the John Rylands University Library of Manchester 65: 148205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. R. (2009) ‘The Aristotelian explanation of the halo’, Apeiron 42: 325–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, W. A. (2013) ‘Libraries and reading culture in the high empire’, in König, Oikonomopoulou and Woolf 2013: 347–63.
Johnson, W. A. and Parker, H. N. (eds) (2009) Ancient Literacies: The Culture of Reading in Greece and Rome, Oxford.Google Scholar
Johnston, I. and Horsley, G. H. R. (2011) Galen, Method of Medicine, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Johnston, S. I. (2001) ‘Charming children: The use of the child in ancient divination’, Arethusa 34: 97117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, S. I. (2008) Ancient Greek Divination, Malden, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, A. (1990) Ptolemy's First Commentator (Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 80.7), Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Jones, A. (1994) ‘The place of astronomy in Roman Egypt’, Apeiron 27: 2551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, A. (1999) Astronomical Papyri from Oxyrhynchus (P. Oxy. 4133–4300a), Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Jones, A. (2005a) ‘Ptolemy's “Canobic Inscription” and Heliodorus's observation reports’, SCIAMVS 6: 5397.Google Scholar
Jones, A. (2005b) ‘In order that we should not ourselves appear to be adjusting our estimates…to make them fit some predetermined amount’, in Buchwald, J. Z. and Franklin, A. (eds), Wrong for the Right Reasons, Dordrecht: 1739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, A. (2010a) ‘Introduction’, in Jones 2010b: xi–xv.
Jones, A. (ed.) (2010b) Ptolemy in Perspective: Use and Criticism of his Work from Antiquity to the Nineteenth Century, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, A. (2011) ‘Ptolemy's Geography: a reform that failed’, in Shalev, Z. and Burnett, C. (eds), Ptolemy's Geography in the Renaissance, London: 1529.Google Scholar
Jones, C. (1978) The Roman World of Dio Chrysostom, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jouanna, J. (1999) Hippocrates (tr. DeBevoise, M. B.; first published in French 1992), Baltimore, MD.Google ScholarPubMed
Keegan, J. (1983) The Face of Battle: A Study of Agincourt, Waterloo, and the Somme, London.Google Scholar
Keen, R. (1985) ‘Lucretius and his reader’, Apeiron 19: 110.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. F. (2011) ‘Sums in verse or a mathematical aesthetic?’, in Green, S. J. and Volk, K. (eds), Forgotten Stars: Rediscovering Manilius’ Astronomica, Oxford: 165–87.Google Scholar
Ker, J. (2006) ‘Seneca, man of many genres’, in Volk, K. and Williams, G. D. (eds), Seeing Seneca Whole: Perspectives on Philosophy, Poetry and Politics, Leiden: 1941.Google Scholar
Ker, J. (2009) ‘Outside and inside: Senecan strategies’, in Dominik, W. J., Garthwaite, J. and Roche, P. A. (eds), Writing Politics in Imperial Rome, Leiden: 249–71.Google Scholar
Keulen, W. (2009) Gellius the Satirist: Roman Cultural Authority in Attic Nights, Leiden.Google Scholar
Khan, Y. (2004) ‘Denys lecteur des Phénomènes d'Aratos’, Revue des études antiques 106: 233–46.Google Scholar
Kidd, D. (1997) Aratus, Phaenomena: Edited with Introduction, Translation and Commentary, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kidd, I. G. (1988) Posidonius, Vol. 2: The Commentary, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kim, L. (2010) Homer between History and Fiction in Imperial Greek Literature, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kindt, J. (2006) ‘Delphic oracle stories and the beginning of historiography: Herodotus’ Croesus Logos’, Classical Philology 101: 3451.Google Scholar
King, C. (2003) ‘The organization of Roman religous beliefs’, Classical Antiquity 22: 275312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klotz, F. (2007) ‘Portraits of the philosopher: Plutarch's self-presentation in the Quaestiones Convivales’, Classical Quarterly 57: 650–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klotz, F. (2011) ‘Imagining the past: Plutarch's play with time’, in Klotz and Oikonomopoulou 2011: 161–78.
Klotz, F. and Oikonomopoulou, K. (eds) (2011) The Philosopher's Banquet: Plutarch's Table Talk in the Intellectual Culture of the Roman Empire, Oxford.Google Scholar
Kneebone, E. (2008) ‘ΤΟΣΣ’ ΕΔΑΗΝ: The poetics of knowledge in Oppian's Halieutica’, in Carvounis and Hunter 2008: 32–59.
Knorr, W. R. (1986) The Ancient Tradition of Geometric Problems, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Knorr, W. R. (1989) Textual Studies in Ancient and Medieval Geometry, Boston, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, C. (2003) ‘Roman state religion in the mirror of Augustan and late Republican apologetics’ (tr. C. Barnes), in Ando 2003: 296–329.
König, A. (2007) ‘Knowledge and power in Frontinus’ On Aqueducts’, in König and Whitmarsh 2007b: 177–205.
König, A. (2009) ‘From architect to imperator: Vitruvius and his addressee in the De architectura’, in Taub and Doody 2009: 31–52.
König, J. (2005) Athletics and Literature in the Roman Empire, Cambridge.Google Scholar
König, J. (2007) ‘Fragmentation and coherence in Plutarch's Sympotic Questions’, in König and Whitmarsh 2007b: 43–68.
König, J. (2009) ‘Conventions of prefatory self-presentation in Galen's On the Order of My Own Books’, in Gill, Whitmarsh and Wilkins 2009: 35–58.
König, J. (2010) ‘Competitiveness and anti-competitiveness in Philostratus’ Lives of the Sophists’, in Fisher, N. and Wees, H. van (eds), Competition in the Ancient World, Swansea: 279300.Google Scholar
König, J. (2011) ‘Self-promotion and self-effacement in Plutarch's Sympotic Questions’, in Klotz and Oikonomopoulou 2011: 179–203.
König, J. (2012) Saints and Symposiasts: The Literature of Food and the Symposium in Greco-Roman and Early Christian Culture, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
König, J. (2014) ‘Images of elite community in Philostratus’ Lives of the Sophists’, in Madsen, J. and Rees, R. (eds), Roman Rule in Greek and Latin Writing: Double Vision, Leiden: 246–70.Google Scholar
König, J. (2016) ‘Re-reading Pollux: Encyclopaedic structure and athletic culture in Onomasticon Book 3’, Classical Quarterly 66: 298315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
König, J. and Whitmarsh, T. (2007a) ‘Ordering knowledge’, in König and Whitmarsh 2007b: 3–39.
König, J. (eds) (2007b) Ordering Knowledge in the Roman Empire, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
König, J., Oikonomopoulou, K. and Woolf, G. (eds) (2013) Ancient Libraries, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
König, J. and Woolf, G. (eds) (2013) Encyclopaedism from Antiquity to the Renaissance, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korenjak, M. (2003) Die Welt-Rundreise eines anonymen griechischen Autors (‘pseudo-Skymnos’): Einleitung, Text, Übersetzung und Kommentar, Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Koster, S. (1970) Antike Epostheorien, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Kowalski, H. (1995) ‘Cicero, Augur und Politiker: Die Theorie und Praxis der Auspizien in Ciceros Tätigkeit’, Acta classica Universitatis Scientiarum Debreceniensis 31: 125–39.Google Scholar
Krause, M. (1936) Die Sphärik von Menelaos aus Alexandrien in der Verbasserung von Abū Nasr Mansūr b. ‘Alī b. ‘Irāq, Berlin.Google Scholar
Krenkel, W. A. (ed.) (2002) Marcus Terentius Varro, Saturae menippeae (with translation and commentary) (4 volumes), St Katharinen.Google Scholar
Kroll, W. (1937) ‘P. Nigidius Figulus’, Pauly-Wissowa RE 17: 200–12.Google Scholar
Kron, J. G. (2008) ‘The much maligned peasant: Comparative perspectives on the productivity of the small farmer in classical antiquity’, in Ligt, L. de and Northwood, S. J. (eds), People, Land and Politics: Demographic Developments and the Transformation of Roman Italy, 300 BC–AD 14, Leiden: 71119.Google Scholar
Kronenberg, L. (2009) Allegories of Farming from Greece and Rome: Philosophical Satire in Xenophon, Varro, and Virgil, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krostenko, B. A. (2000) ‘Beyond (dis)belief: Rhetorical form and religious symbol in Cicero's de Divinatione’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 130: 353–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krueger, D. (2004) Writing and Holiness: The Practice of Authorship in the Early Christian East, Philadelphia, PA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. (1962) ‘The structure of scientific revolutions’, International Encyclopedia of Unified Science: Foundations of the Unity of Science, Vol. 2.2, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Kühner, R. and Gerth, B. (1904) Ausführliche Grammatik der griechischen Sprache (3rd edn), Hanover.Google Scholar
Kullmann, W., Althoff, J. and Asper, M. (eds) (1998) Gattungen wissenschaftlicher Literatur in der Antike, Tübingen.Google Scholar
Kurth, T. (1994) Senecas Trostschrift an Polybius, Dialog 11: Ein Kommentar (Beiträge zur Altertumskunde 59), Stuttgart.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lammert, F. (1931) Die römische Taktik zu Beginn der Kaiserzeit und die Geschichtsschreibung, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Langlands, R. (2008) ‘“Reading for the moral” in Valerius Maximus: The case of severitas’, Cambridge Classical Journal 54: 160–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langlands, R. (2011) ‘Roman exempla and situation ethics: Valerius Maximus and Cicero, De officiis’, Journal of Roman Studies 101: 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lateiner, D. (1989) The Historical Method of Herodotus, Toronto.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Latour, B. (1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Le Bohec, Y. (1998) ‘Que voulait Onasandros?’, in Burnand, Y., Le Bohec, Y. and Martin, J.-P. (eds), Claude de Lyon empereur romain, Paris: 169–79.Google Scholar
le Saux, F. (2004) ‘War and knighthood in Christine de Pizan's Livre des fait d'armes et de chevallerie’, in Saunders, C., Saux, F. le and Thomas, N. (eds), Writing War: Medieval Literary Responses to Warfare, Cambridge: 93105.Google Scholar
Lebek, W. D. (1976) Lucans Pharsalia: Dichtungsstruktur und Zeitbezug, Göttingen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeman, A., Pinkster, J. and Wisse, J. (1981–96) M. Tullius Cicero, De oratore, Libri III (4 volumes), Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Y. (1997) Varron théologien et philosophe romain, Brussels.Google Scholar
Lehoux, D. (2007) Astronomy, Weather, and Calendars in the Ancient World: Parapegmata and Related Texts in Classical and Near-Eastern Societies, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lehoux, D. (2012) What Did the Romans Know? An Inquiry into Science and Worldmaking, Chicago, IL.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehoux, D. (2013) ‘Seeing and unseeing, seen and unseen’, in Lehoux, D., Morrison, A. D. and Sharrock, A. (eds), Lucretius: Poetry, Philosophy, Science, Oxford: 131–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenaghan, J. O. (1969) A Commentary on Cicero's Oration De haruspicum responso, The Hague.Google Scholar
Lenoir, M. (1996) ‘La littérature De re militari’, in Nicolet, C. (ed.), Les Littératures téchniques dans l'antiquité romaine: Statut, public et destination, tradition (Fondation Hardt. Entretiens sur l'antiquité classique 42), Geneva: 77115.Google Scholar
Levick, B. (2003) ‘Seneca and money’, in De Vivo, A. and Lo Cascio, E. (eds), Seneca uomo politico e l'età di Claudio e di Nerone: Atti del Convegno Internazionale (Capri 25–27 marzo 1999), Bari: 211–28.Google Scholar
Lewis, A.-M. (1998) ‘What dreadful purpose do you have? A new explanation of the astrological prophecy of Nigidius Figulus in Lucan's Pharsalia I, 658–63’, Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History 9: 379400.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. J. T. (2001) Surveying Instruments of Greece and Rome, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lhommé, M.-K. (2007) ‘Varron et Verrius au 2ème siècle après Jésus-Christ’, in Glinister and Woods 2007: 11–47.
Lieberg, G. (1973) ‘Die “theologia tripartita” in Forschung und Bezeugung’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt I, 4: 63115.Google Scholar
Liebs, D. (1976) ‘Rechtsschulen und Rechtsunterricht im Prinzipat’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II, 15: 197216.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, J. L. (2008) ‘Catalogue technique in Dionysius Periegetes’, in Carvounis and Hunter 2008: 11–31.
Lightfoot, J. L. (2014) Dionysius Periegetes, Description of the Known World, with Introduction, Text, Translation, and Commentary, Oxford.Google Scholar
Lim, R. (1995) Public Disputation, Power, and Social Order in Late Antiquity, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Lindemann, A. (2005) ‘Paul's influence on “Clement” and Ignatius’, in Gregory and Tuckett 2005: 9–24.
Linderski, J. (1971) ‘Römischer Staat und Götterzeichen: Zum Problem der obnuntiatio’, Jahrbuch der Universität Düsseldorf 1969–1970: 309–22 (= Linderski 1995: 444–57).
Linderski, J. (1982) ‘Cicero and Roman divination’, La parola del passato 37: 1238 (= Linderski 1995: 458–84).Google Scholar
Linderski, J. (1985) ‘The libri reconditi’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 89: 207–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linderski, J. (1986) ‘The augural law’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II, 16: 2146–312.Google Scholar
Linderski, J. (1995) Roman Questions: Selected Papers, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Ling, R. (1991) ‘Brading, Brantingham and York: A new look at some fourth-century mosaics’, Britannia 22: 148–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littlewood, R. J. (2006) A Commentary on Ovid, Fasti Book VI, Oxford.Google Scholar
Littré, E. (1839–61) Oeuvres complètes d'Hippocrate (10 volumes), Paris.Google Scholar
Liuzzi, D. (1983) Nigidio Figulo ‘astrologo e mago’: Testimonianze e frammenti, Lecce.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. (1975) ‘The Hippocratic question’, Classical Quarterly 25: 171–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. (1979) Magic, Reason, and Experience: Studies in the Origins and Development of Greek Science, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. (1982) ‘Observational error in later Greek science’, in Barnes, J. and Brunschwig, J. (eds), Science and Speculation: Studies in Hellenistic Theory and Practice, Cambridge: 128–64.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. (1983) Science, Folklore and Ideology: Studies in the Life Sciences in Ancient Greece, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. (1987a) The Revolutions of Wisdom: Studies in the Claims and Practice of Ancient Greek Science, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. (1987b) ‘Dogmatism and uncertainty in early Greek speculative thought’, in Detienne, M. (ed.), Poikilia: Études offertes à J.-P. Vernant, Paris: 297312.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. (1988) ‘Scholarship, authority and argument in Galen's Quod animi mores’, in Manuli, P. and Vegetti, M. (eds), Le Opere psicologiche di Galeno, Naples: 1142.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. (1990) Demystifying Mentalities, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. (1991a) ‘Galen on Hellenistics and Hippocrateans: Contemporary battles and past authorities’, in Lloyd 1991b: 398–416.
Lloyd, G. E. R. (1991b) Methods and Problems in Greek Science: Selected Papers, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. (1996a) ‘Theories and practices of demonstration in Galen’, in Frede, M. and Striker, S. (eds), Rationality in Greek Thought, Oxford: 255–77.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. (1996b) Adversaries and Authorities: Investigations into Ancient Greek and Chinese Science, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. (2002) The Ambitions of Curiosity, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. (2005) ‘Mathematics as a model of method in Galen’, in Sharples 2005: 110–30.
Lloyd, G. E. R. (2009) Disciplines in the Making, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. (2012) ‘The pluralism of Greek “mathematics”’, in Chemla, K. (ed.), The History of Mathematical Proof in Ancient Traditions, Cambridge: 294310.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. (2014) The Ideals of Inquiry, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. and Sivin, N. (2002) The Way and the Word: Science and Medicine in Early China and Greece, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Long, A. (2002) Epictetus: A Stoic and Socratic Guide to Life, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, P. O. (2001) Openness, Secrecy, Authorship: Technical Arts and the Culture of Knowledge from Antiquity to the Renaissance, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Lonie, I. M. (1964) ‘Erasistratus, the Erasistrateans and Aristotle’, Bulletin of the History of Medicine 38: 426–43.Google ScholarPubMed
López Férez, J. A. (ed.) (1991) Galeno: Obra, pensamiento y influencia, Madrid.Google Scholar
Loraux, N. (1986) ‘Thucydide a écrit La Guerre du Péloponnèse’, Métis 1: 139–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, T. (1965) Galerien von griechischen Philosophen- und Dichterbildnissen bei den Römern, Mainz.Google Scholar
Luraghi, N. (2003) ‘Dionysios von Halikarnassos zwischen Griechen und Römern’, in Eigler, U., Gotter, U., Luraghi, N. and Walter, U. (eds), Formen römischer Geschichtsschreibung von den Anfängen bis Livius: Gattungen – Autoren – Kontexte, Darmstadt: 268–86.Google Scholar
Lynch, C. (ed.) (2003) Niccolò Macchiavelli, Art of War (translated, edited, and with a commentary), Chicago.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. D. (1989) Exemplum: The Rhetoric of Example in Early Modern France and Italy, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Ma, J. (1999) Antiochus III and the Cities of Western Asia Minor, Oxford.Google Scholar
Machiavelli, N. (2003) Art of War: Translated, Edited and with a Commentary by Christopher Lynch, Chicago, IL.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, J. L. (2009) ‘Rethinking Roman Religion: Action, Practice, and Belief’ (PhD Diss., Princeton).
MacMullen, R. (1966) Enemies of the Roman Order, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacRae, D. (2013a) ‘The Books of Numa: Writing, Intellectuals and the Making of Roman Religion’ (PhD Diss., Harvard).
MacRae, D. (2013b) ‘Review of Rüpke 2012’, American Journal of Philology 134: 510–14.Google Scholar
Magnelli, E. (2005) ‘Esiodo “epico” ed Esiodo didattico: il doppio epilogo di Dionisio Periegeta’, Appunti romani di filologia 7: 105–8.Google Scholar
Magnelli, E. (2006) ‘Altre fonti e imitazioni del poema di Dionisio Periegeta’, Studi italiani di filologia classica 4: 241–51.Google Scholar
Mahaffy, J. P. (1889) ‘The work of Mago on agriculture’, Hermathena 7: 2935.Google Scholar
Malloch, S. J. V. (2015) ‘Frontinus and Domitian: The politics of the Strategemata’, Chiron 45: 77100.Google Scholar
Manitius, K. (ed.) (1894) Gemini elementa astronomiae (with translation and commentary), Leipzig (reprinted Stuttgart, 1974).Google Scholar
Mann, J. E. (2008) ‘Prediction, precision, and practical experience: The Hippocratics on technē’, Apeiron 4: 89122.Google Scholar
Manning, C. E. (1981) On Seneca's ‘Ad Marciam’ (Mnemosyne Suppl. 69), Leiden.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1998) Prolegomena mathematica: From Apollonius of Perga to Late Neoplatonism, with an Appendix on Pappus and the History of Platonism, Leiden.Google Scholar
Marcotte, D. (2000) Géographes grecs, Vol. 1: Introduction générale, Paris.Google Scholar
Marincola, J. (1997) Authority and Tradition in Ancient Historiography, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maróti, E. (1976) The Vilicus and the Villa-System in Ancient Italy, Budapest.Google Scholar
Marrou, H. I. (1938) Saint Augustin et la fin de la culture antique, Paris.Google Scholar
Marsden, E. W. (1971) Greek and Roman Artillery: Technical Treatises, Oxford.Google Scholar
Martin, J. (1956) Histoire du texte des Phénomènes d'Aratos, Paris.Google Scholar
Martin, J. (1997) ‘John of Salisbury's manuscripts of Frontinus and Gellius’, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 40: 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. (1998) Aratos, Phénomènes (2 volumes), Paris.Google Scholar
Martin, R. (1971) Recherches sur les agronomes latins et leurs conceptions économiques et sociales, Paris.Google Scholar
Martin, R. (1972) ‘“Familia rustica”: les ésclaves chez les agronomes latins’, in Actes du colloque 1972 sur l'ésclavage, Paris: 267–97.Google Scholar
Martin, R. (1985) ‘État présent des études sur Columelle’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II, 32(3): 1959–79.Google Scholar
Martínez, V. M. and Senseney, M. F. (2013) ‘The professional and his books: Special libraries in the ancient world’, in König, Oikonomopoulou and Woolf (2013): 401–17.
Matilal, B. K. (1998) The Character of Logic in India (ed. Ganeri, J. and Tiwari, H.), Albany, NY.Google Scholar
Mattern, S. P. (2008) Galen and the Rhetoric of Healing, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Mattern, S. P. (2013) The Prince of Medicine, Oxford.Google Scholar
May, J. and Wisse, J. (2001) Cicero: On the Ideal Orator, New York.Google Scholar
Mazour-Matusevich, Y. and Bejczy, I. P. (2007) ‘Jean Gerson on virtues and princely education’, in Bejczy, I. P. and Nederman, C. J. (eds), Princely Virtues in the Middle Ages 1200–1500, Turnhout.Google Scholar
McEwen, I. K. (2003) Vitruvius: Writing the Body of Architecture, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
McGill, S. (2012) Plagiarism in Latin Literature, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLean, D. R. (2007) ‘The Socratic corpus: Socrates and physiognomy’, in Trapp, M. (ed.), Socrates from Antiquity to the Enlightenment, Aldershot: 6588.Google Scholar
Meissner, B. (1999) Die technologische Fachliteratur der Antike: Struktur, Überlieferung und Wirkung technischen Wissens in der Antike (ca. 400 v. Chr. – ca. 500 n. Chr.), Berlin.Google Scholar
Mendell, H. (2008a) ‘Euktêmôn of Athens (440–410 BCE)’, in EANS: 317.
Mendell, H. (2008b) ‘Metôn of Athens (440–410 BCE)’, in EANS: 551–2.
Mendelson, E. (1976) ‘Encyclopedic narrative: From Dante to Pynchon’, Modern Language Notes 91: 1267–75.Google Scholar
Merkel, R. (ed.) (1841) P. Ovidii Nasonis: Fastorum libri sex (with commentary), Berlin.Google Scholar
Mertz, E. (2007) The Language of Law School: Learning to ‘Think Like a Lawyer’, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mevoli, D. (1992) ‘Una “magia” di Nigidio (Apul. apol. 42)’, Studi di filologia e letteratura 2: 115–25.Google Scholar
Millar, F. (1986) ‘A new approach to the Roman jurists’, Journal of Roman Studies 76: 272–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millar, F. (1999) ‘The Greek east and Roman law: The dossier of M. Cn. Licinius Rufus’, Journal of Roman Studies 89: 90108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millis, W. (1961) Military History, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Milner, N. P. (1996) Vegetius: Epitome of Military Science, Liverpool.Google Scholar
Mitchell, M. W. (2006) ‘In the footsteps of Paul: Scriptural and apostolic authority in Ignatius of Antioch’, Journal of Early Christian Studies 14: 2745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moatti, C. (1997) La raison de Rome: Naissance de l'esprit critique à la fin de la République (IIe–Ier siècle avant Jésus-Christ), Paris.Google Scholar
Moles, J. (1983) ‘The date and purpose of the Fourth Kingship Oration of Dio Chrysostom’, Classical Antiquity 2: 251–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moles, J. (1990) ‘The Kingship Orations of Dio Chrysostom’, Papers of the Leeds Latin Seminar 6: 297375.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. (1984) ‘The theological efforts of the Roman upper classes in the first century B.C.’, Classical Philology 79: 199211 (reprinted in Ando 2003: 147–63).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mora, F. (1995) Il pensiero storico-religioso antico: Autori greci e Roma, Vol. 1: Dionigi d'Alicarnasso, Rome.Google Scholar
Moraux, P. (1981) ‘Galien comme philosophe: la philosophie de la nature’, in Nutton 1981: 87–116.
Morgan, T. (2013) ‘Encyclopaedias of virtue? Collections of sayings and stories about wise men in Greek’, in König and Woolf 2013: 108–28.
Morson, G. S. (1989) ‘Parody, history, and metaparody’, in Morson, G. S. and Emerson, C. (eds), Rethinking Bakhtin: Extensions and Challenges, Evanston, IL: 6386.Google Scholar
Morysine, R. (1539) The Strategemes, Sleyghtes, and Policies of Warre, gathered together, by S. Julius Frontinus, and translated into Englyshe, by Rycharde Morysine, London.Google Scholar
Mosca, B. (1937) ‘Satira filosofica e politica nelle Menippee di Varrone’, Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa 6: 4177.Google Scholar
Most, G. (1999) ‘The poetics of early Greek philosophy’, in Long, A. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy, Cambridge: 332–62.Google Scholar
Most, G. (2011) ‘War and justice in Hesiod’, in Formisano and Böhme 2011: 13–21.
Mras, K. (1914) ‘Varros Menippeische Satiren und die Philosophie’, Neues Jahrbuch für Philologie 33: 390420.Google Scholar
Mueller, I. (1991) ‘On the notion of a mathematical starting point in Plato, Aristotle, and Euclid’, in Bowen, A. (ed.), Science and Philosophy in Classical Greece, London: 5997.Google Scholar
Müller, C. (1855–61) Geographi Graeci minores (2 volumes), Paris.Google Scholar
Müller, C. F. W. (1879) M. Tulli Ciceronis scripta quae manserunt omnia, Part 4, Vol. 3, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Murray, P. (2004) ‘The Muses and their arts’, in Murray, P. and Wilson, P. (eds), Music and the Muses: The Culture of Mousike in the Classical Athenian City, Oxford: 365–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musial, D. (2001) ‘Sodalicium Nigidiani: les Pythagoriciens à Rome à la fin de la République’, Revue de l'histoire des religions 218: 339–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narducci, E. (1974) ‘Sconvolgimenti naturali e profezia delle guerre civili: Phars. I 522–695’, Maia 26: 97110.Google Scholar
Nederman, C. (ed.) (1990) John of Salisbury: Policraticus: On the Frivolities of Courtiers and the Footprints of Philosophers, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Nelsestuen, G. (2011) ‘Polishing Scrofa's agronomical eloquentia: Representation and critique in Varro's De re rustica’, Phoenix 65: 315–51.Google Scholar
Nesselrath, H.-G. (1985) Lukians Parasitendialog: Untersuchungen und Kommentar, Berlin.Google Scholar
Netz, R. (1997) ‘Classical mathematics in the classical Mediterranean’, Mediterranean Historical Review 12: 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Netz, R. (1999) The Shaping of Deduction in Greek Mathematics: A Study in Cognitive History, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Netz, R. (2000) ‘Why did Greek mathematicians publish their analyses?’, in Suppes, P., Moravcsik, J. M. and Mendell, H. (eds), Ancient and Medieval Traditions in the Exact Sciences: Essays in Memory of Wilbur Knorr, Stanford, CA: 139–57.Google Scholar
Netz, R. (2001) ‘On the Aristotelian paragraph’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 47: 211–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Netz, R. (2002) ‘Greek mathematicians: A group picture’, in Tuplin and Rihll 2002: 196–216.
Netz, R. (2004) The Transformation of Mathematics in the Early Mediterranean World: From Problems to Equations, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Netz, R. (2009) Ludic Proof: Greek Mathematics and the Alexandrian Aesthetic, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Netz, R., Noel, W., Tchernetska, N. and Wilson, N. (eds) (2011) The Archimedes Palimpsest (2 volumes), Cambridge.Google Scholar
Neudecker, R. (2013) ‘Archives, books and sacred space in Rome’, in König, Oikonomopoulou and Woolf (2013): 312–31.
Neugebauer, O. (1975) A History of Ancient Mathematical Astronomy (3 volumes), Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neugebauer, O. and Van Hoesen, H. B. (1959) Greek Horoscopes, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Newlands, C. E. (1995) Playing with Time: Ovid and the Fasti, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Nickel, D. (1989) Untersuchungen zur Embryologie Galens, Berlin.Google Scholar
Nickel, D. (2001) Galen: Über die Ausformung der Keimlinge (CMG 5.3.3), Berlin.Google Scholar
Noè, E. (1977) ‘L'agronomo Cneo Tremellio Scrofa’, Numismatica e Antichità Classiche 6: 119–33.Google Scholar
Noè, E. (2001) ‘La memoria dell'antico in Columella: continuità, distanza, conoscenza’, Athenaeum 89: 319–43.Google Scholar
North, J. (1986) ‘Review article: Religion and politics, from Republic to Principate’, Journal of Roman Studies 76: 251–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, J. (1990) ‘Diviners and divination at Rome’, in Beard and North 1990: 49–71.
Novara, A. (2005) Auctor in bibliotheca: Essai sur les textes préfaciels de Vitruve et une philosophie latine du livre, Louvain.Google Scholar
Nutton, V. (1979) Galen, On Prognosis (CMG 5.8.1), Berlin.Google Scholar
Nutton, V. (ed.) (1981) Galen: Problems and Prospects, London.Google Scholar
Nutton, V. (1999) Galen: On My Own Opinions: Text, Translation and Commentary (CMG 5.3.2), Berlin.Google Scholar
Nutton, V. (2009) ‘Galen's authorial voice: A preliminary enquiry’, in Taub and Doody 2009: 53–62.
Nutton, V. (2013) Ancient Medicine (2nd edn; 1st edn published in 2004), Abingdon.Google ScholarPubMed
O'Daly, G. (1999) Augustine's City of God: A Reader's Guide, Oxford.Google Scholar
Oldfather, W. (1928) ‘Onasander, Strategikós’, in Illinois Greek Club, Aeneas Tacticus, Asclepiodotus, Onasander (Loeb Classical Library), Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Oldfather, W. (1933–67) Diodorus of Sicily (Loeb Classical Library), Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Olivelle, P. (1996) Upanişads, Oxford.Google Scholar
Olson, D. and Sens, A. (1999) Matro of Pitane and the Tradition of Epic Parody in the Fourth Century BCE, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
Önnerfors, A. (ed.) (1995) Vegetius. Epitoma rei militaris, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Papathomopoulos, M. (2003) Oppianus Apameensis: Cynegetica. Eutecnius, Sophistes: Paraphrasis metro soluta, Munich.Google Scholar
Paret, P. (1992) Understanding War: Essays on Clausewitz and the History of Military Power, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Parpola, S. (1993) Letters from Assyrian and Babylonian Scholars (State Archives of Assyria 10), Helsinki.Google Scholar
Parry, R. (2007) ‘Episteme and techne’, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/episteme-techne/ (last consulted 10 August 15) (revised version; first published online 2003).
Paschalis, M. (2000) ‘Generic affiliations in Roman and Greek Cynegetica’, in Sifakis, G. M. (ed.), Κτερίσματα: φιλολογικά μελετήματα αφιερωμένα στον Ιω. Καμπίτση (1938–1990), Herakleion: 201–32.Google Scholar
Peachin, M. (2002) ‘Introduction’, in Aubert and Sirks (2002): 1–14.
Pease, A. S. (1920–23) M. Tulli Ciceronis De divinatione (2 volumes), Urbana, IL.Google Scholar
Pedersen, O. (2011) A Survey of the Almagest (with annotation and new commentary by Jones, A.), New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peglau, M. (2003) ‘Varro: ein Antiquar zwischen Tradition und Aufklärung’, in Haltenhoff, A., Heil, A. and Mutschler, F.-H. (eds), O Tempora, O Mores!: Römische Werte und römische Literatur in den letzten Jahrzehnten der Republik, Munich: 137–64.Google Scholar
Pendergraft, M. (1990) ‘On the nature of the constellations: Aratus, Ph. 367–85’, Eranos 88: 99106.Google Scholar
Pera, M. (1994) The Discourses of Science, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Pera, M. and Shea, W. (eds) (1991) Persuading Science: The Art of Scientific Rhetoric, Canton, MA.Google Scholar
Perfigli, M. (2004) Indigitamenta: Divinità funzionali e funzionalità divina nella religione romana, Pisa.Google Scholar
Petrocelli, C. (2008) Onasandro, Il generale: Manuale per l'esercizio del comando, Bari.Google Scholar
Phillips, A. A. and Willcock, M. M. (1999) Xenophon and Arrian, On Hunting. Warminster.Google Scholar
Piganiol, A. (1951) ‘Sur le calendrier brontoscopique de Nigidius Figulus’, in Coleman-Norton, P. R. (ed.), Studies in Roman Economic and Social History in Honor of Allan Chester Johnson, Princeton, NJ: 7987.Google Scholar
Pigeaud, A. and Pigeaud, J. (eds) (2000) Les Textes médicaux latins comme literature: Actes du VIe Colloque International sur les Textes Médicaux Latins du 1er au 3 septembre 1998 à Nantes, Nantes.Google Scholar
Pingree, D. (1994) ‘The teaching of the Almagest in late antiquity’, Apeiron 27: 7598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, J. I. (2006a) ‘Introduction: What is “classical” about classical antiquity?’, in Porter 2006c: 1–65.
Porter, J. I. (2006b) ‘Feeling classical: Classicism and ancient literary criticism’, in Porter 2006c: 301–52.
Porter, J. I. (ed.) (2006c) Classical Pasts: The Classical Traditions of Greece and Rome, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Potter, D. S. (2004) The Roman Empire at Bay, AD 180–395, London.Google Scholar
Powell, J. G. F. (1996) ‘Response by J. G. F. Powell’, in Sommerstein 1996: 59–64.
Pownall, F. S. (1998) ‘Condemnation of the impious in Xenophon's “Hellenica”’, Harvard Theological Review 91: 251–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pownall, F. S. (2004) Lessons from the Past. The Moral Use of History in Fourth-Century Prose, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Prets, E. (2000) ‘Theories of debate, proof and counter-proof in the early Indian dialectical tradition’, in Balcerowitz, P. and Mejor, M. (eds), On the Understanding of Other Cultures, Warsaw: 369–81.Google Scholar
Puech, B. (2002) Orateurs et sophistes grecs dans les inscriptions d’époque imperial, Paris.Google Scholar
Purves, A. C. (2010) Space and Time in Ancient Greek Narrative, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabier, C. (2007a) Fields of Expertise: A Comparative History of Expert Procedures in Paris and London, 1600 to Present, Newcastle.Google Scholar
Rabier, C. (2007b) ‘Introduction: Expertise in historical perspectives’, in Rabier (2007a): 1–34.
Rasmussen, S. W. (2000) ‘Cicero's stand on prodigies: A non-existent dilemma?’, in Wildfang, R. L. and Isager, J. (eds), Divination and Portents in the Roman World, Odense: 924.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, S. W. (2003) Public Portents in Republican Rome, Rome.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, T. (2001) ‘Roman agriculture and rural settlement in central Italy’, in Herz, P. and Waldherr, G. (eds), Landwirtschaft im Imperium Romanum, St Katharinen: 221–34.Google Scholar
Rathbone, D. (2008) ‘Poor peasants and silent sherds’, in Ligt, L. de and Northwood, S. J. (eds), People, Land and Politics: Demographic Developments and the Transformation of Roman Italy 300 BC–AD 14, Leiden: 305–32.Google Scholar
Rawson, E. (1978) ‘Caesar, Etruria and the Disciplina Etrusca’, Journal of Roman Studies 68: 132–52 (= Rawson, E. (1991) Roman Culture and Society: Collected Papers, Oxford: 289–323).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawson, E. (1985) Intellectual Life in the Late Roman Republic, London.Google Scholar
Reay, B. (2005) ‘Agriculture, writing, and Cato's aristocratic self-fashioning’, Classical Antiquity 24: 331–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rebuffat, E. (2001) ΠΟΙΗΤΗΣ ΕΠΕΩΝ: Tecniche di composizione poetica negli Halieutica di Oppiano, Florence.Google Scholar
Reeve, M. D. (2004) Vegetius, Epitoma Rei Militaris, Oxford.Google Scholar
Reinach, T. (1906) ‘Inscriptions d'Aphrodisias’, Revue des Études Grecques 19: 79150, 205–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhardt, T. (2003) Cicero's Topica: Edited with an Introduction, Translation and Commentary, Oxford.Google Scholar
Reis, D. M. (2005) ‘Following in Paul's footsteps: Mimesis and power in Ignatius of Antioch’, in Gregory and Tuckett 2005: 287–305.
Relihan, J. C. (1993) Ancient Menippean Satire, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Rengakos, A. (2011a), ‘Herodot’, in Zimmermann 2011: 338–80.
Rengakos, A. (2011b) ‘Thukydides’, in Zimmermann 2011: 381–417.
Reynolds, J. M. (1996) ‘Honouring benefactors at Aphrodisias: A new inscription’, in Roueché, C. and Smith, R. R. R. (eds), Aphrodisias Papers 3: The Setting and Quarries, Mythological and Other Sculptural Decoration, Architectural Development, Portico of Tiberius, and Tetrapylon (Journal of Roman Archaeology Suppl. 20), Ann Arbor, MI: 121–6.Google Scholar
Richardot, P. (1997) Végèce et la culture militaire au Moyen-Âge, Paris.Google Scholar
Ridings, D. (1995) The Attic Moses: The Dependency Theme in Some Early Christian Writers, Göteborg.Google Scholar
Riess, W. (2008) ‘Apuleius Socrates Africanus? Apuleius’ defensive play’, in Riess, W. (ed.), Paideia at Play: Learning and Wit in Apuleius, Groningen: 5173.Google Scholar
Riggsby, A. (2007) ‘Guides to the wor(l)d’, in König and Whitmarsh 2007b: 88–107.
Rihll, T. E. (1999) Greek Science, Oxford.Google Scholar
Rimell, V. (2007) ‘Petronius’ lessons in learning – the hard way’, in König and Whitmarsh 2007b: 108–32.
Rives, J. B. (2007) Religion in the Roman Empire, Malden, MA.Google Scholar
Rives, J. B. (2010) ‘Graeco-Roman religion in the Roman Empire: Old assumptions and new approaches’, Currents in Biblical Research 8: 240–99.Google Scholar
Roby, C. (2016) Technical Ekphrasis in Ancient Science: The Written Machine between Alexandria and Rome, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rochberg, F. (2000) ‘Scribes and scholars: The tupšar Enūma Anu Enlil’, in Marzahn, J. K. and Neumann, H. (eds), Assyriologica et Semitica (Alter Orient und Altes Testament, 252), Münster: 359–76.Google Scholar
Rochberg, F. (2004) The Heavenly Writing: Divination, Horoscopy, and Astronomy in Mesopotamian Culture, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roche, P. (2009) Lucan: De Bello Ciuili Book I, Oxford.Google Scholar
Rodgers, R. H. (2004) Frontinus, De Aquaeductu Urbis Romae, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Romano, E. (1987) La capanna e il tempio: Vitruvio o dell’ architectura, Palermo.Google Scholar
Roochnik, D. (1996) Of Art and Wisdom: Plato's Understanding of Techne, University Park, PA.Google Scholar
Rosafio, P. (1994) ‘Slaves and coloni in the villa system’, in Carlsen, J., Ørsted, P. and Skydsgaard, J. E. (eds), Landuse in the Roman Empire, Rome: 145–58.Google Scholar
Rose, L. E. (1968) Aristotle's Syllogistic, Springfield, MO.Google Scholar
Rosen, R. (1990) ‘Poetry and sailing in Hesiod's Works and Days’, Classical Antiquity 9: 99113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, R. (2008) ‘Socratism in Galen's psychological works’, in Brockmann, C., Brunschön, W. and Overwien, O. (eds), Antike Medizin im Schnittpunkt von Geistes- und Naturwissenschaften (Beiträge zur Altertumskunde), Berlin: 155–71.Google Scholar
Rosen, R. (2010) ‘Galen, satire, and the compulsion to instruct’, in Horstmanshoff, H. M. F. (ed.), Hippocrates and Medical Education, Leiden: 325–42.Google Scholar
Rosenberger, V. (2003) ‘Die verschwundene Leiche: Überlegungen zur Auffindung des Sarkophags Numas im Jahre 181 v. Chr.’, in Kranemann, B. and Rüpke, J. (eds), Das Gedächtnis des Gedächtnisses: Zur Präsenz von Ritualen in beschreibenden und reflektierenden Texten, Marburg: 3959.Google Scholar
Rosenberger, V. (2007) ‘Republican nobiles: Controlling the res publica’, in Rüpke, J. (ed.), A Companion to Roman Religion, Malden, MA: 292303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenblitt, J. A. (2011) ‘The “devotio” of Sallust's Cotta’, American Journal of Philology 132: 397427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosillo López, C. (2009) ‘La guerra civil de las letras: religión, panfletarios y lucha política (49–44 a.c.)’, Klio 91: 104–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, D. O. (1975) Backgrounds to Augustan Poetry: Gallus, Elegy and Rome, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rossiter, J. J. (2007) ‘Wine-making after Pliny: Viticulture and farming technology in late antique Italy’, in Lavan, L., Zanini, E. and Sarantis, A. C. (eds), Technology in Transition: A.D. 300–650, Leiden: 93118.Google Scholar
Roth, U. (2004) ‘Inscribed meaning: The vilica and the villa economy’, Papers of the British School at Rome 72: 101–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rüpke, J. (2012) Religion in Republican Rome: Rationalization and Ritual Change, Philadelphia, PA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, D. (1973) Plutarch, London.Google Scholar
Sabin, P., Van Wees, H. and Whitby, M. (eds) (2007) Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Warfare, Vol. 2, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Santangelo, F. (2013) Divination, Prediction and the End of the Roman Republic, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santini, C. (1992) ‘Il prologo degli Strategemata di Sesto Giulio Frontino’, in Santini, Scivoletto and Zurli 1990–98, Vol. 2: 983–90.
Santini, C., Scivoletto, M. and Zurli, L. (1990–98) Prefazioni, prologhi, proemi di opere tecnico-scientifiche latine (3 volumes), Rome.Google Scholar
Sanudo Torsello, M. (2011) The Book of the Secrets of the Faithful of the Cross (Liber Secretorum Fidelium Crucis) (tr. Lock, Peter), Farnham.Google Scholar
Sautel, J.-H. (2010) ‘Un récit de théophanie chez Denys d'Halicarnasse: L'apparition des Dioscures à la bataille du Lac Régille (Antiquités Romaines, VI, 13). Etude rhétorique’, Revue des études antiques 112: 375–90.Google Scholar
Savage, S. (1945) ‘Remotum a notitia vulgari’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 76: 157–65.Google Scholar
Scheid, J. (1987–89) ‘La parole des dieux: l'originalité du dialogue des romains avec leur dieux’, Opus 6–8: 125–36.Google Scholar
Scheid, J. (1996) ‘Indigetes or –ites, indigitamenta’, in Hornblower, S. and Spawforth, A. (eds), The Oxford Classical Dictionary (3rd edn), Oxford: 755.Google Scholar
Schenkl, H. (1916) Epicteti dissertationes ab Arriano digestae, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Schiesaro, A. (1997) ‘The boundaries of knowledge in Virgil's Georgics’, in Habinek and Schiesaro (1997): 63–89.
Schiesaro, A., Mitsis, P. and Clay, J. S. (eds) (1993) Mega nepios: Il destinatario nell'epos didascalico (Materiali e discussioni 31), Pisa.Google Scholar
Schindel, U. (2000) ‘Apuleius: Africanus Socrates? Beobachtungen zu den Verteidigungsreden des Apuleius und des platonischen Sokrates’, Hermes 128: 443–56.Google Scholar
Schlapbach, K. (2010) ‘The logoi of philosophers in Lucian of Samosata’, Classical Antiquity 29: 250–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, A. (2005) Augustus und die Macht der Sterne: Antike Astrologie und die Etablierung der Monarchie in Rom, Cologne.Google Scholar
Schmitt, W. (1969) ‘Kommentar zum ersten Buch von Pseudo-Oppians Kynegetica’ (PhD Diss., Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität zu Münster).
Schmitz, T. (1997) Bildung und Macht: Zur sozialen und politischen Funktion der zweiten Sophistik in der griechischen Welt der Kaiserzeit, Munich.Google Scholar
Schmitz, T. (2009) ‘Narrator and audience in Philostratus’ Lives of the Sophists’, in Bowie, E. and Elsner, J. (eds), Philostratus, Cambridge: 4968.Google Scholar
Schmitz, T. (2010) ‘A sophists's drama: Lucian and classical tragedy’, in Gildenhard, I. and Revermann, M. (eds), Beyond the Fifth Century: Interactions with Greek Tragedy from the Fourth Century BCE to the Middle Ages, Berlin: 289311.Google Scholar
Schmitz, T. A. and Wiater, N. (eds) (2011) The Struggle for Identity: Greeks and Their Past in the First Century BCE, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1986) ‘Cicero for and against divination’, Journal of Roman Studies 76: 4765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, C. E. (2009) ‘Argument and anecdote in Cicero's De divinatione’, in Harvey, P. B. Jr and Conybeare, C. (eds), Maxima debetur magistro reverentia: Essays on Rome and the Roman Tradition in Honor of Russell T. Scott, Como: 193206.Google Scholar
Schultz, C. E. (2014) A Commentary on Cicero, De divinatione I, Ann Arbor, MI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, F. (1946) History of Roman Legal Science, Oxford.Google Scholar
Schultze, C. (1986) ‘Dionysius of Halicarnassus and his audience’, in Moxon, I. S., Smart, J. D. and Woodman, A. J. (eds), Past Perspectives: Studies in Greek and Roman Historical Writing, Cambridge: 121–41.Google Scholar
Schultze, C. (1995) ‘Dionysius of Halicarnassus and Roman chronology’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 41: 192214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultze, C. (2000) ‘Authority, originality and competence in the Roman Archaeology of Dionysius of Halicarnassus’, Histos 4: 649.Google Scholar
Schultze, C. (2012) ‘Negotiating the plupast: Dionysius of Halicarnassus and Roman self-definition’, in Grethlein, J. and Krebs, C. B. (eds), Time and Narrative in Ancient Historiography: The ‘Plupast’ from Herodotus to Appian, Cambridge: 113–38.Google Scholar
Schwager, T. (2012) Militärtheorie im Späthumanismus: Kulturtransfer taktischer und strategischer Theorien in den Niederlanden und Frankreich (1590–1660), Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwyzer, E. (1968) Griechische Grammatik (4th edn), Munich.Google Scholar
Scodel, R. (2008) Epic Facework: Self-Presentation and Social Interaction in Homer, Swansea.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (1997) ‘Plato's auctoritas and the rebirth of the commentary tradition’, in Barnes, J. and Griffin, M. (eds), Philosophia Togata II, Oxford: 110–29.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (2007) Creationism and its Critics in Antiquity, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (2013) ‘Cicero and the Timaeus’, in Schofield, M. (ed.), Aristotle, Plato and Pythagoreanism in the First Century BC: New Directions for Philosophy, Cambridge: 187205.Google Scholar
Semanoff, M. (2006) ‘Undermining authority: Pedagogy in Aratus’ Phaenomena’, in Harder, Regtuit and Wakker 2006: 303–18.
Serbat, G. (2003) Celse, De la médecine, Livres I et II, Paris.Google Scholar
Setaioli, A. (2000) Facundus Seneca: Aspetti della lingua e dell'ideologia senecana, Bologna.Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (1977) Cicero: Epistulae ad Familiares (2 volumes), Cambridge.Google Scholar
Shapin, S. (1994) A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. (ed.) (2005) Philosophy and the Sciences in Antiquity, Aldershot.Google Scholar
Sickinger, J. P. (2009) ‘Nothing to do with democracy: “Formulae of disclosure” and the Athenian epigraphic habit’, in Mitchell, L. G. and Rubinstein, L. (eds), Greek History and Epigraphy: Essays in Honour of P. J. Rhodes, Swansea: 87102.Google Scholar
Sidebottom, H. (2009) ‘Philostratus and the symbolic roles of the sophist and the philosopher’, in Bowie, E. and Elsner, J. (eds), Philostratus, Cambridge: 6999.Google Scholar
Sigsbef, D. L. (1976) ‘The paradoxa Stoicorum in Varro's Menippeans’, Classical Philology 71: 244–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, P. N. (1997) Galen: Selected Works, Oxford.Google Scholar
Singer, P. N. (2013) Galen: Psychological Writings, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Skutsch, O. (1985) The Annals of Q. Ennius, Edited with an Introduction and Commentary, Oxford.Google Scholar
Skydsgaard, J. E. (1968) Varro the Scholar: Studies in the First Book of Varro's De Re Rustica, Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Sluiter, I. (2013) ‘The violent scholiast: Power issues in ancient commentaries’, in Asper 2013a: 191–214.
Smith, C. (1998) ‘Onasander on how to be a general’, in Austin, M., Harries, J. and Smith, C. (eds), Modus Operandi: Essays in Honour of Geoffrey Rickman, London: 151–66.Google Scholar
Smith, C. B. (2011) ‘Ministry, martyrdom and other mysteries: Pauline influence on Ignatius of Antioch’, in Bird, M. F. and Dodson, J. R. (eds), Paul and the Second Century, London: 3756.Google Scholar
Smith, R. (1978) ‘The mathematical origins of Aristotle's syllogistic’, Archive for History of Exact Sciences 19: 201–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. (1983) ‘What is Aristotelian ecthesis?’, History and Philosophy of Logic 3: 113–27.Google Scholar
Smith, W. D. (1979) The Hippocratic Tradition, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Sommerstein, A. H. (ed.) (1996) Religion and Superstition in Latin Literature, Bari.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. (ed.) (1990) Aristotle Transformed: The Ancient Commentators and Their Influence, London.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. (2000) Emotion and Peace of Mind: From Stoic Agitation to Christian Temptation, Oxford.Google Scholar
Soubiran, J. (1972) Cicéron: Aratea, Fragments poétiques, Paris.Google Scholar
Spentzou, E. and Fowler, D. (eds) (2002) Cultivating the Muse: Struggles for Power and Inspiration in Classical Literature, Oxford.Google Scholar
Spurr, M. S. (1986) ‘Agriculture and the Georgics’, Greece and Rome 33: 164–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stadter, P. A. (1976) ‘Xenophon in Arrian's Cynegeticus’, Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 17: 157–67.Google Scholar
Stadter, P. A. (1978), ‘The Ars tactica of Arrian: Tradition and originality’, Classical Philology 73: 117–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stadter, P. A. (1980) Arrian of Nicomedia, Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar
Stanton, G. (1973) ‘Sophists and philosophers: Problems of classification’, American Journal of Philology 94: 351–64.Google Scholar
Star, C. (2012) The Empire of the Self: Self-Command and Political Speech in Seneca and Petronius, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Star, C. (2009) ‘Divisions of speech’, in Gunderson 2009: 77–91.
Steenbakkers, P. (1994) Spinoza's Ethica from Manuscript to Print, Utrecht.Google Scholar
Steiner, D. (2005) ‘Nautical matters: Hesiod's Nautilia and Ibycus fragment 282 PMG’, Classical Philology 100: 347–55.Google Scholar
Stephens, S. A. (2003) Seeing Double: Intercultural Poetics in Ptolemaic Alexandria, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Stoll, O. (2005) ‘Wenig imponierend? Einige Gedanken zum Stand der römischen Technik und Agrartechnik’, Relationes Budvicenses 4: 517.Google Scholar
Stump, E. (ed.) (1988) Boethius In Ciceronis Topica: An Annotated Translation of a Medieval Dialectical Text, Ithaca.Google Scholar
Swain, S. (1996) Hellenism and Empire: Language, Classicism, and Power in the Greek World, AD 50–250, Oxford.Google Scholar
Swain, S. (ed.) (2000) Dio Chrysostom: Politics, Letters and Philosophy, Oxford.Google Scholar
Swigger, R. (1975) ‘Fictional encyclopedism and the cognitive value of literature’, Comparative Literature Studies 12: 351–66.Google Scholar
Swoboda, A. (1889) P. Nigidii Figuli reliquiae, Vienna.Google Scholar
Tannery, P. (1929) ‘Aristóte, Météorologie, livre III, ch. V’, in Heiberg, J. L. and Zeuthen, H. G. (eds), Mémoires Scientifiques, Vol. 9, Paris: 5161.Google Scholar
Tarrant, H. (1985) ‘Alcinous, Albinus, Nigrinus’, Antichthon 19: 8795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrant, H. (2003) ‘Athletics, competition and the intellectual’, in Phillips, D. and Pritchard, D. (eds), Sport and Festival in the Ancient Greek World, Swansea: 351–63.Google Scholar
Tarrant, R. (1995) ‘Ovid and the failure of rhetoric’, in Innes, D., Hine, H. and Pelling, C. (eds), Ethics and Rhetoric: Classical Essays for Donald Russell on his Seventy-Fifth Birthday, Oxford: 6374.Google Scholar
Tarver, T. (1996) ‘Varro, Caesar, and the Roman calendar: a study in Late Republican religion’, in Sommerstein 1996: 39–57.
Tatum, W. J. (1999) ‘Roman religion: Fragments and further questions’, in Byrne, S. N. and Cueva, E. P. (eds), Veritatis amicitiaeque causa: Essays in Honor of Anna Lydia Motto and John R. Clark, Wauconda, IL: 273–91.Google Scholar
Taub, L. C. (1993) Ptolemy's Universe: The Natural Philosophical and Ethical Foundations of Ptolemy's Astronomy, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Taub, L. C. (2003) Ancient Meteorology, London.Google Scholar
Taub, L. C. and Doody, A. (eds) (2009) Authorial Voices in Greco-Roman Technical Writing, Trier.Google Scholar
Tellegen-Couperus, O. and Tellegen, J. W. (2013) ‘Artes urbanae: Roman law and rhetoric’, in Du Plessis (2013): 31–50.
Thom, P. (1993) ‘Apodeictic ecthesis’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 34: 193208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, A. (1930) Jean Gerson et l’éducation des Dauphins de France: Étude critique, Paris.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. (2000) Herodotus in Context: Ethnography, Science, and the Art of Persuasion, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1987) ‘Prose into poetry: Tradition and meaning in Virgil's Georgics’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 91: 229–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1988) Virgil, Georgics, Vol. 1: Books I–II, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Tieleman, T. L. (1996) Galen and Chrysippus on the Soul: Argument and Refutation in the De placitis Books II–III, Leiden.Google Scholar
Tihon, A. (2010) ‘An unpublished astronomical papyrus contemporary with Ptolemy’, in Jones 2010b: 1–10.
Timpanaro, S. (1988) Marco Tullio Cicerone: Della divinazione, Milan.Google Scholar
Timpanaro, S. (1994) ‘Alcuni fraintendimenti del De divinatione’, in Timpanaro, S., Nuovi contributi di filologia e storia della lingua latina, Bologna: 241–64.Google Scholar
Tolsa, C. (2013) ‘Claudius Ptolemy and Self-Promotion: A Study on Ptolemy's Intellectual Milieu in Roman Alexandria’ (PhD diss., University of Barcelona).
Toomer, G. J. (1974a) ‘Meton’, in Gillespie 1970–90: 9.337–40.
Toomer, G. J. (1974b) ‘Hipparchus on the distances of the sun and moon’, Archive for History of Exact Sciences 14: 126–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toomer, G. J. (1975) ‘Ptolemy’, in Gillespie 1970–90: 9.186–206.
Toomer, G. J. (1978) ‘Hipparchus’, in Gillespie 1970–90: 15.207–224.
Toomer, G. J. (1984) Ptolemy's Almagest, London.Google Scholar
Totelin, L. (2009) Hippocratic Recipes: Oral and Written Transmission of Pharmacological Knowledge in Fifth- and Fourth-Century Greece, Leiden.Google Scholar
Totelin, L. (2012) ‘And to end on a poetic note: Galen's authorial strategies in the pharmacological books’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 43: 307–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Traina, A. (1995) Lo stile ‘drammatico’ del filosofo Seneca (4th edn), Bologna.Google Scholar
Trapp, M. (1997) Maximus of Tyre: The Philosophical Orations, Oxford.Google Scholar
Trapp, M. (2000) ‘Plato in Dio’, in Swain (2000): 213–39.
Trapp, M. (2003) Greek and Latin Letters: An Anthology with Translation, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Trapp, M. (2007) Philosophy in the Roman Empire: Ethics, Politics and Society, Aldershot.Google Scholar
Trapp, M. (2012) ‘Dio Chrysostom and the value of prestige’, in Roskam, G., De Pourcq, M. and Stockt, L. van der (eds), The Lash of Ambition: Plutarch, Imperial Greek Literature and the Dynamics of Philotimia, Louvain: 119–41.Google Scholar
Trapp, M. (2014) ‘Philosophia between Greek and Latin culture: Naturalized immigrant or eternal stranger?’, in Mestre, F. and Gómez, P. (eds), Three Centuries of Greek Culture under the Roman Empire: Homo Romanus Graeca oratione, Barcelona: 248.Google Scholar
Trapp, M. (forthcoming) ‘Visibly different? Looking at philosophoi in the Roman Imperial period’, in P. Vesperini (ed.), Philosophari: Usages romains des savoirs grecs sous la République et sous l'Empire. Actes des Colloques de l’École Française de Rome, Paris.
Tuplin, C. J. and Rihll, T. E. (eds) (2002) Science and Mathematics in Ancient Greek Culture, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turfa, J. M. (2012) Divining the Etruscan World: The Brontoscopic Calendar and Religious Practice, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, A. (2007) ‘Frontinus and Domitian: Laus principis in the Strategemata’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 103: 423–49.Google Scholar
Usener, H. (1896) Götternamen: Versuch einer Lehre von der Religiösen Begriffsbildung, Bonn.Google Scholar
Valvo, A. (1988) La ‘Profezia di Vegoia’: Proprietà fondiaria e aruspicina in Etruria nel I secolo a.c., Rome.Google Scholar
Van der Eijk, P. (1997) ‘Towards a grammar of ancient scientific discourse’, in Bakker, E. (ed.), Grammar as Interpretation: Greek Literature in its Linguistic Contexts, Leiden: 77129.