Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-544b6db54f-d2wc8 Total loading time: 0.559 Render date: 2021-10-20T05:09:42.538Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2018

Erik Kenyon
Affiliation:
Rollins College, Florida
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armstrong, Arthur Hilary. Plotinus: Enneads. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Bostock, David. Plato’s Phaedo. Oxford, 1986.Google Scholar
Bouton-Touboulic, Anne-Isabelle. L’ordre caché. Paris: Institut d’Études Augustiniennes, 2004.Google Scholar
Brisson, Luc. Porphyre: Sentences. Paris: Libraire Philosophique J. Vrin, 2005.Google Scholar
Brittain, Charles. Cicero: On Academic Skepticism. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc., 2006.Google Scholar
Catapano, Giovanni. Aurelio Agostino: Tutti i dialoghi. Milan: Il Pensiero Occidentale, 2006.Google Scholar
Dolbeau, François. “Sermon inédit de saint Augustin sur la providence divine.” Revue des Études Augustiniennes 41 (1995): 267289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doignon, Jean. Œuvres de Saint Augustin: Dialogues philosophiques: La Vie heureuse. Paris: Bibliothèque Augustinienne, 1986.Google Scholar
Doignon, Jean. Œuvres de Saint Augustin: Dialogues philosophiques: L’Ordre. Paris: Bibliothèque Augustinienne, 1997.Google Scholar
Foley, Helene. The Homeric Hymn to Demeter. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994, esp. 6575.Google Scholar
Foley, Michael. The De Ordine of St. Augustine. Dissertation. Boston College, 1999.
Fuhrer, Therese. Augustin: Contra Academicos Bücher 2 und 3. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Co., 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, W. M., ed. Corpus Christianorum Series Latina 29/2 (1970).
Jackson, Belford Darrell, ed. Augustine: De Dialectica. Synthese Historical Library 16. Dordrecht: Synthese Historical Library, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Peter, trans. Augustine: Against the Academicians and the Teacher. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc., 1995.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine. “Introduction.” In Kant: Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, edited by Gregor, Mary and Timmermann, Jens, ixxxxvi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, Anthony and Sedley, David, eds. Hellenistic Philosophers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Nehamas, Alexander and Woodruff, Paul. Plato: Symposium. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc., 1989.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, James. Augustine Confessions: Volume 2: Commentary, Books 1–7. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
O’Meara, John, trans. Against the Academics. Westminster: Ancient Christian Writers 12, 1950.Google Scholar
Reynolds, L. D., ed. L. Annaei Senecae ad Lucilium Epistulae Morales. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Reynolds, L. D., ed. M. Tulli Ciceronis De Finibus Bonorum et Malorum Libri Quinque. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Russel, Robert, trans. Divine Providence and the Problem of Evil: A Translation of St. Augustine’s De Ordine. New York, NY: Cosmopolitan Science & Art Service Co., Inc., 1942.Google Scholar
Schäublin, Christoph. Marcus Tullius Cicero: Über die Wahrsagung/De Divinatione. Düsseldorf: Artemis & Winkler, 2002.Google Scholar
Schlapbach, Karin. Augustin Contra Academicos (vel De Academicis) Buch 1 Einleitung und Kommentar. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2003.Google Scholar
Trelenberg, Jörg. Augustins Schrift De ordine. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2009.Google Scholar
Watson, Gerard. Saint Augustine: Soliloquies and Immortality of the Soul. Warminster: Aris & Phillips, 1986.Google Scholar
Adams, Marilyn McCord. Horrendous Evils and the Goodness of God. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Adams, Marilyn McCord and Adams, Robert Merrihew, eds. The Problem of Evil. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Alfaric, Prosper. L’évolution intellectuelle de saint Augustin. Paris: Émile Nourry, 1918.Google Scholar
Algra, Keimpe. “Chrysippus, Carneades, Cicero: The Ethical Divisiones in Cicero’s Lucullus.” In Assent and Argument, edited by Inwood, Brad and Mansfeld, Jaap, 107139. Leiden: Brill, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, James. “Academic Probabilism and Stoic Epistemology.” Classical Quarterly 44 (1994): 85113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asiedu, F.The Wise Man and the Limits of Virtue in De Beata Vita: Stoic Self-Sufficiency or Augustinian Irony?Augustiniana 49 (1999): 215234.Google Scholar
Ayres, Lewis. “‘Giving Wings to Nicaea’: Reconceiving Augustine’s Earliest Trinitarian Theology.” Augustinian Studies 38/1 (2007): 2140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BeDuhn, Jason. Augustine’s Manichaean Dilemma, 1: Conversion and Apostasy, 373–388 C.E. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Benson, Hugh. Socratic Wisdom: The Model of Knowledge in Plato’s Early Dialogues. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Benson, Hugh. Clitophon’s Challenge: Dialectic in Plato’s Meno, Phaedo, and Republic. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bermon, Emmanuel. “‘Contra Academicos vel De Academicis’ (Retract. I, 1): Saint Augustin et les Academica de Cicéron.” Revue des Étudies Anciennes 111/1 (2009): 7593.Google Scholar
Betegh, Gábor. “Tale, Theology and Teleology in Phaedo.” In Plato’s Myths, edited by Partenie, Catalin, 77100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Bett, Richard. “Carneades’ Distinction between Assent and Approval.” Monist 73/1 (1990): 320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouton-Touboulic, Anne-Isabelle. “Les valeurs d’ordo et leur réception chez saint Augustin.” Revue des Études Augustiniennes 45 (1999): 295334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouton-Touboulic, Anne-Isabelle. “Dire l’ordre caché: Les discours sur l’ordre chez saint Augustin.” Revue des Études Augustiniennes 52 (2006): 143166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyer, Charles. Christianisme et néo-platonisme dans la formation de saint Augustin. Paris: G. Beauchesne, 1920.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, George. Post-Hellenistic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Brittain, Charles. Philo of Larissa: The Last of the Academic Skeptics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Brittain, Charles. “Attention Deficit in Plotinus and Augustine: Psychological Problems in Christian and Platonist Theories of the Grades of Virtue.” Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 28 (2003): 223263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brittain, Charles. “Common Sense: Concepts, Definitions and Meaning In and Out of the Stoa.” In Language and Learning, edited by Frede, Dorothea and Inwood, Brad, 165209. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Brittain, Charles. “Augustine as a Reader of Cicero.” In Tolle Lege: Essays on Augustine and Medieval Philosophy, edited by Taylor, Richard, Twetten, David and Wren, Michael, 81114. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Brittain, Charles. “Self-knowledge in Cicero and Augustine (De Trinitate, X, 5,7–10, 16).” Medioevo 37 (2012): 107136.Google Scholar
Brown, Peter. Augustine of Hippo: A Biography. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, Miles. “Carneades Was No Probablist.” Unpublished.
Cabrera, Derek and Colosi, Laura. Thinking at Every Desk: Four Simple Skills to Transform Your Classroom. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company, 2012.Google Scholar
Cary, Phillip. “An Abandoned Proof.” In Augustine’s Invention of the Inner Self: The Legacy of a Christian Platonist. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000, 95104.Google Scholar
Cary, Phillip S.What Licentius Learned.” Augustinian Studies 29/1 (1998): 141163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catapano, Giovanni. “Augustine’s Treatise De Immortalitate Animae and the Proof of the Soul’s Immortality in Soliloquia.” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 25 (2014): 6784.Google Scholar
Catapano, Giovanni. “In philosophiae gremium confugere: Augustine’s View of Philosophy in the First Book of his Contra Academicos.” Dionysius 18 (2000): 4568.Google Scholar
Catapano, Giovanni. “Quale scetticismo viene criticato de Agostino nel Contra Academicos?Quaestio 6 (2006): 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catapano, Giovanni. “The Development of Augustine’s Metaphilosophy: Col 2:8 and the ‘Philosophers of This World’.” Augustinian Studies 38/1 (2007): 233254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chisholm, Roderick. “The Defeat of Good and Evil.” In The Problem of Evil, edited by Adams, Marilyn McCord and Adams, Robert Merrihew, 5368. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Claes, Martin. “Limitations to the exercitatio mentis: Changes in Rhetorical Style in Augustine’s Dialogues.” Augustiniana 57 (2007): 387398.Google Scholar
Clark, Gillian. “Can We Talk? Augustine and the Possibility of Dialogue.” In The End of Dialogue in Antiquity, edited by Goldhill, Simon, 117134. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Cloeren, Herman J.St. Augustine’s De Magistro, a Transcendental Investigation.” Augustinian Studies 16 (1985): 2127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conybeare, Catherine. The Irrational Augustine. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Couissin, Pierre. “The Stoicism of the New Academy.” In The Skeptical Tradition, edited by Burnyeat, M., 3163. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Courcelle, Pierre. Les lettres grecques en Occident, de Macrobe à Cassiodore. Paris: Bibliothèque des Écoles françaises et de Rome, 1943.Google Scholar
Courcelle, Pierre. Recherches sur les Confessions de saint Augustin. Paris: de Boccard, 1968.Google Scholar
Curley, Augustine. Augustine’s Critique of Skepticism. New York, NY: Studies in the Humanities Literature – Politics – Society, 1996.Google Scholar
Cutino, Michele. “I Dialogi di Agostino dinanzi al De regressu animae di Porfirio.” Recherches Augustiniennes 27 (1994): 4174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diggs, Bernard J.St. Augustine against the Academicians.” Traditio 7 (1951): 7393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobell, Brian. Augustine’s Intellectual Conversion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodaro, Robert. “Augustine on the Statesman and the Two Cities.” In A Companion to Augustine, edited by Vessey, Mark, 386397, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2012, esp. 393–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doignon, Jean. “La praxis de l’admonitio dans les Dialogues de Cassiciacum de saint Augustin.” Vetera Christianorum 23 (1986): 2137.Google Scholar
Doignon, Jean. “Saint Augustin et sa culture philosophique face au problème du bonheur.” Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Theologie 34/3 (1987): 339359.Google Scholar
Doignon, Jean. “Développements stoïcisants d’Augustin autour de l’“exemplum” cicéronien d’Orata.” Signum Pietatis 60 (1989): 5361.Google Scholar
Dubreucq, Eric. “Augustin et le scepticisme académicien.” Recherches de Science Religieuse 86/3 (1998): 335365.Google Scholar
Dutton, Blake. “Augustine, Academic Skepticism, and Zeno’s Definition.” Augustiniana 53 (2003): 730.Google Scholar
Dutton, Blake. Augustine and Academic Skepticism: A Philosophical Study. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Emilsson, Eyjólfur Kjalar. “Cognition and Its Object.” In Cambridge Companion to Plotinus, edited by Gerson, Lloyd, 217249. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emilsson, Eyjólfur Kjalar. Plotinus on Intellect. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, Gail. “Knowledge and Belief in Republic 5–7.” In Plato, vol. 1, pp. 215246. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Fine, Gail. “Inquiry in the Meno.” In Plato on Knowledge and Forms, 200226. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Foley, Michael. “Cicero, Augustine, and the Philosophical Roots of the Cassiciacum Dialogues.” Revue des Études Augustiniennes 45 (1999): 5177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frede, Michael. “Stoics and Skeptics on Clear and Distinct Impressions.” In Essays in Ancient Philosophy, 151176. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Frede, Michael. “The Sceptic’s Beliefs.” In Essays in Ancient Philosophy, 179200. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Frede, Michael. “The Sceptic’s Two Kinds of Assent.” In Essays in Ancient Philosophy, 201222. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Frede, Michael. “The Stoic Notion of a Lekton.” In Language, edited by Everson, Steven, 109128. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Frede, Michael. “Stoic Epistemology.” In The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, edited by Algra, Keimpe, Barnes, Jonathan, Mansfeld, Jaap and Schofield, Malcolm, 295322. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fredriksen, Paula. “Paul and Augustine: Conversion Narratives, Orthodox Traditions and the Retrospective Self.” Journal of Theological Studies 37 (1986): 334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuhrer, Therese. “Das Kriterium der Wahrheit in Augustins Contra Academicos.” Vigiliae Christianae 46 (1992): 257275.Google Scholar
Fuhrer, Therese. “Der Begriff veri simile bei Cicero und Augustin.” Museum Helveticum 50/2 (1993): 107125.Google Scholar
Fuhrer, Therese. “Skeptizismus und Subjektivität: Augustins antiskeptische Argumentation und das Konzept der Verinnerlichung.” In Geschichte und Vorgeschichte der modernen Subjektivität, edited by Reto, Luzius Fetz, Roland, Hagenbüchle and Peter, Schulz, 319339. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1998.Google Scholar
Fuhrer, Therese. “Augustins Frühdialoge als Inszenierung der Einheit von religiöser Praxis und philosophischem Dialog.” In Metaphysik und Religion, edited by Kobusch, Theo and Erler, Michael, 309322. Munich: K. G. Saur, 2002.Google Scholar
Fuhrer, Therese. “Zum erkenntnistheoretischen Hintergrund von Augustins Glaubensbegriff.” In Die christlich-philosophischen Diskurse der Spätanktike: Texte, Personen, Institutionen, edited by Fuhrer, Therese, 191210. Stuttgart, 2008.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Glucker, John. Antiochus and the Late Academy. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1978.Google Scholar
Goldhill, Simon, ed. The End of Dialogue in Antiquity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Hadot, Ilsetraut. Arts libéraux et philosophie dans la pensée antique. Paris: Études Augustiniennes, 1948.Google Scholar
Hadot, Pierre. “Le Contra Academicos de saint Augustin et l’histoire de l’Académie.” École Pratique des Hautes Études, section 5: Sciences religieuses 77 (1969): 291295.Google Scholar
Hadot, Pierre. “La présentation du platonisme par Augustin.” In Kerygma und Logos, edited by Ritter, A. M., 272279. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1979.Google Scholar
Hagendahl, Harald. Augustine and the Latin Classics. Göteborg: Studia Graeca et Latina Gothoburgensia, 1967.Google Scholar
Halliburton, R. J.The Inclination to Retirement – The Retreat of Cassiciacum and the ‘Monastery’ of Tagaste.” Studia Patristica 5 (1962): 329340.Google Scholar
Harding, Brian. “Skepticism, Illumination and Christianity in Augustine’s Contra Academicos.” Augustinian Studies 34/2 (2003): 197212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, Brian. “Epistemology and Eudaimonism in Augustine’s Contra Academicos.” Augustinian Studies 37/2 (2006): 247274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, Carol. “Augustine of Hippo’s Cassiciacum Confessions: Towards a Reassessment of the 390s.” Augustinian Studies 31/2 (2000): 219224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, Carol. Rethinking Augustine’s Early Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, Simon. Augustine’s Way into the Will: The Theological and Philosophical Significance of De Libero Arbitrio. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harwardt, Sabine. “Die Glücksfrage der Stoa in Augustins De Beata Vita: Übernahme und Anwendung stoischer Argumentationsmuster.” In Zur Rezeption der hellenistischen Philosophie in der Spätantike, edited by Fuhrer, Theresa and Ehler, Michael, 153171. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 1999.Google Scholar
Heath, Malcolm. Unity in Greek Poetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Heil, John. “Augustine’s Attack on Skepticism: the Contra Academicos.” Harvard Theological Review 65/1 (1972): 99116.Google Scholar
Hick, John. “Soul-Making and Suffering.” In The Problem of Evil, edited by Adams, Marilyn McCord and Merrihew Adams, Robert, 168188. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Hirzel, Rudolf. Der Dialog, ein literarhistorischer Versuch. Leipzig: S. Hirzel, 1895.Google Scholar
Holt, Laura. “Scripture: Wisdom’s Teacher: Augustine at Cassiciacum.” Augustinian Studies 29 (1998): 4759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holte, Ragnar. Béatitude et Sagesse: Saint Augustin et le problème de la fin de l’homme dans la philosophie ancienne. Paris: Études Augustiniennes, 1962.Google Scholar
Howard-Snyder, Daniel. The Evidential Argument from Evil. Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Hübner, Wolfgang. “Der Ordo der Realien in Augustins Frühdialog De ordine.” Revue des Études Augustiniennes 33 (1987): 2348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, Mark D.Ancient Philosophical Protreptic and the Problem of Persuasive Genres.” Rhetorica 4/4 (1986): 309333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, William. “Augustine on Music.” In Grace, Politics and Desire: Essays on Augustine, edited by Meynell, Hugo Anthony, 123135. Calgary: University of Calgary Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Kamimura, Naoki. “Self-Knowledge and the Disciplines ‘in uita’ in Augustine’s De ordine.” Patristica, Suppl. vol. 2 (2006): 7696.Google Scholar
Kenyon, Erik. “The Order of Augustine’s Cassiciacum Dialogues,” Augustinian Studies 42/2 (2011): 173188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenyon, Erik. “Augustine and the Liberal Arts,” Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 21/1 (2012): 105113.Google Scholar
Kenyon, Erik. “Platonic Pedagogy in Augustine’s Dialogues,” Ancient Philosophy 34 (2014): 151168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenyon, Erik and Terorde-Doyle, Diane. “Art & Dialogue: An Experiment in Pre-K Philosophy.” Analytic Teaching and Philosophical Praxis (2017): 26–35.
Kenyon, Erik. “Augustine to the Carolingian Renaissance,” In Cambridge Companion to Medieval Ethics, edited by Thomas Williams (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, forthcoming).
Kidd, Erika. “Making Sense of Virgil in De Magistro.” Augustinian Studies 46/2 (2015): 211224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Peter. “Augustine’s Encounter with Neoplatonism.” Modern Schoolman 82 (2005): 213233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirwan, Christopher. “Against the Skeptics.” In Augustine, 1534. London: Routledge, 1989.Google Scholar
Kolbet, Paul R. Augustine and the Cure of Souls: Reviving a Classical Ideal. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Kraut, Richard. “Introduction to the Study of Plato,” In Cambridge Companion to Plato. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kretzmann, Norman. “Faith Seeks, Understanding Finds: Augustine’s Charter for Christian Philosophy.” In Christian Philosophy, edited by Flint, Thomas, 136. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Law, Vivian. “St. Augustine’s ‘De grammatica’: Lost or Found?Recherches Augustiniennes 19 (1984): 155183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leher, Seth. Boethius and Dialogue: Literary Method in “The Consolation of Philosophy” Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
LeMoine, Fannie. “Augustine: On Education and the Liberal Arts.” In Saint Augustine the Bishop: A Book of Essays, edited by LeMoine, Fannie and Kleinhenz, Christopher, 179188. New York: Garland Publishing, 1994.Google Scholar
Levy, Carlos. “Scepticisme et dogmatisme dans l’Académie: “l’ésotérisme” d’Arcésilas.” Revue des Études Augustiniennes 56 (1979): 335348.Google Scholar
Lewis, Charlton T. and Short, Charles. A Latin Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Lim, Richard. “Christians, Dialogues and Patterns of Sociability in Late Antiquity.” In The End of Dialogue in Antiquity, edited by Goldhill, Simon, 151172. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Long, Alex. “Plato’s Dialogues and a Common Rationale for Dialogue Form.” In The End of Dialogue in Antiquity, edited by Goldhill, Simon, 4559. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Scott. “Augustine.” In A Companion to the Middle Ages, edited by Gracia, Jorge and Noone, Timothy, 154171. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2003.Google Scholar
Mackie, John L.Evil and Omnipotence.” Mind 64 (1955): 200212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madec, Goulven. “L’Hortensius de Cicéro dans les livres XIII–XIV de De Trinitate.” Revue des Études Augustiniennes 15 (1969): 167173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madec, Goulven. “L’historicité des Dialogues de Cassiciacum.” Revue des Études Augustiniennes 32 (1986): 207231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markus, Robert. Conversion and Disenchantment in Augustine’s Spiritual Career. Villanova, PA: Villanova University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Marrou, Henri-Irénée. Saint Augustin et la fin de la culture antique. Paris: E. de Boccard, 1938.Google Scholar
Matthews, Gareth. Thought’s Ego in Augustine and Descartes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Matthews, Gareth. Socratic Perplexity and the Nature of Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Matthews, Gareth. The Philosophy of Childhood. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Matthews, Gareth. “Knowledge and Illumination.” In Cambridge Companion to Augustine, edited by Stump, Eleonore and Kretzmann, Norman, 171185. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, Gareth. Augustine. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McWilliam, Joanne. “The Cassiciacum Autobiography.” Studia Patristica 17 (1990): 1443.Google Scholar
Meister, Chad. Evil: A Guide to the Perplexed. London: Continuum, 2012.Google Scholar
Menn, Stephen. Descartes and Augustine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meulenbroek, B. L.The Historical Character of Augustine’s Cassiciacum Dialogues.” Mnemosyne 13 (1947): 203229.Google Scholar
Miles, Richard. “‘Let’s (Not) Talk About It’ Augustine and the Control of Epistolary Dialogue.” In The End of Dialogue in Antiquity, edited by Goldhill, Simon, 135148. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Miller, Mitchell. “Beginning the ‘Longer Way’.” In Cambridge Companion to Plato’s Republic, edited by Ferrari, G. R. F.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007, 310344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosher, David. “The Argument of St. Augustine’s Contra Academicos.” Augustinian Studies 12 (1981): 89114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mourant, John. “Augustine and the Academics.” Recherches Augustiniennes 4 (1966): 6796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neiman, Alven Michael. “The Argument of Augustine’s Contra Academicos.” Modern Schoolman 59 (1982): 255279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, Lex. “Descartes’ Epistemology.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/ (2014).
Obbink, Dirk. “‘What All Men Believe Must Be True’: Common Conceptions and consensio omnium.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 10 (1992): 193231.Google Scholar
O’Connell, Robert. St. Augustine’s Early Theory of Man. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohlmann, Desiderius. De Sancti Augustini dialogis in Cassiciaco scriptis. Strassburg: Argentorati, 1897.Google Scholar
O’Meara, Dominic. J. “Scepticism and Ineffability in Plotinus.” Phronesis 45/3 (2000): 240251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Meara, John. “Neo-Platonism in the Conversion of Saint Augustine.” Dominican Studies 3 (1950): 334343.Google Scholar
O’Meara, John. “The Historicity of the Early Dialogues of Saint Augustine.” Vigiliae Christianae 5 (1951): 150178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Meara, John. “Porphyry’s Philosophy from Oracles in Eusebius’ Praeparatio Evangelica and Augustine’s Dialogues of Cassiciacum.” Recherches Augustiniennes 6 (1969): 107138.Google Scholar
Parma, Christian. Pronoia und Providentia: Der Vorsehungsbegriff Plotins und Augustins. Leiden: Brill, 1971.Google Scholar
Pike, Nelson. “Hume on Evil.” The Philosophical Review 72 (1963): 180197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin. “God, Evil, and the Metaphysics of Freedom.” In The Problem of Evil, edited by Adams, Marilyn McCord and Adams, Robert Merrihew, 83110. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Pollmann, Karla and Vessey, Mark. Augustine and the Disciplines. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Powell, J. G. F. Cicero the Philosopher. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Pucci, Joseph. Augustine’s Virgilian Retreat: Reading the Auctores at Cassiciacum. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 2014.Google Scholar
Rappe, Sara. “Self-Knowledge and Subjectivity in the Enneads.” In Cambridge Companion to Plotinus, edited by Gerson, Lloyd, 250274. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rief, Josef. Der Ordobegriff des jungen Augustinus. Paderborn: Abhandlungen zur Moraltheologie, 1962.Google Scholar
Rist, John. “Certainty, Belief and Understanding.” In Augustine: Ancient Thought Baptized, 4191. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rist, John. “Faith and Reason.” In Cambridge Companion to Augustine, edited by Stump, Eleonore and Kretzmann, Norman, 2639. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, William. “The Problem of Evil and Some Varieties of Atheism.” American Philosophical Quarterly 16 (1979): 335341.Google Scholar
Schäfer, Christian. “Aqua haeret: A View on Augustine’s Technique of Biographical Self-Observation in De Ordine.” Index Augustiniana 51 (2001): 6575.Google Scholar
Schanzer, Danuta. “Augustine’s Disciplines: Silent diutius Musae Varronis?” In Augustine and the Disciplines, edited by Pollmann, Karla and Vessey, Mark, 71112. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Schlapbach, Karin. “Ciceronisches und Neoplatonisches in den Proömien von Augustin, Contra Academicos 1 und 2.” In Zur Rezeption der hellenistischen Philosophie in der Spätantike, edited by Fuhrer, Theresa and Ehler, Michael, 139151. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 1999.Google Scholar
Schlapbach, Karin. “Divination, Wissen und Autorität in Augustins Cassiciacum-Dialogen.” Museum Helveticum 62 (2005): 8498.Google Scholar
Schofield, Malcolm. “Academic Epistemology.” In Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, edited by Algra, Keimpe, Barnes, Jonathan, Mansfeld, Jaap and Schofield, Malcolm, 323351. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, Malcolm. “Ciceronian Dialogue.” In The End of Dialogue in Antiquity, edited by Goldhill, Simon, 6384. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Scott, Dominic. Plato’s Meno. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, David. “The Motivation of Greek Scepticism.” In Skeptical Tradition, edited by Burnyeat, Miles, 929. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Smalbrugge, Matthias S.L’argumentation probabiliste d’Augustin.” Revue des Études Augustiniennes 32 (1986): 4155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solignac, Aimé. “Doxographies et manuels dans la formation philosophique de saint Augustin.” Recherches Augustiniennes 1 (1958): 8148.Google Scholar
Sommer, Andreas Urs. “Weltordnung und geordnetes Leben beim jungen Augustinus: Einige Bemerkungen zu De ordine.” Prima Philosophia 12/3 (1999): 85107.Google Scholar
Slings, Simon R.Protreptic in Ancient Theories of Philosophical Literature.” In Greek Literary Theory after Aristotle, edited by Abbenes, Jelle, Slings, Simon, Sluiter, Ineke and Schenkeveld, Dirk, 173192. Amsterdam: VU University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Stock, Brian. Augustine’s Inner Dialogue: The Philosophical Soliloquy in Late Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Striker, Gisela. “On the Difference between the Pyrrhonists and the Academics.” In Essays on Hellenistic Epistemology and Ethics, 135149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Striker, Gisela. “Sceptical Strategies.” In Essays on Hellenistic Epistemology and Ethics, 92115. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stump, Eleanore. Wandering in Darkness. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrant, Harold. “Socratic Method and Socratic Truth.” In A Companion to Socrates, edited by Ahbel-Rappe, Sara and Kamtekar, Rachana, 254272. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
TeSelle, Eugene. Augustine the Theologian. New York, NY: Herder and Herder, 1970.Google Scholar
Theiler, Willy. Porphyrios und Augustin. Halle: Niemeyer, 1933.Google Scholar
Topping, Ryan. “The Perils of Skepticism: The Moral and Educational Argument of Contra Academicos.” International Philosophical Quarterly 49/3 (2009): 333350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Topping, Ryan. St. Augustine. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group, 2010.Google Scholar
Topping, Ryan. Happiness and Wisdom: Augustine’s Early Theology of Education. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tornau, Christian. “Ratio in subiecto? The Sources of Augustine’s Proof for the Immortality of the Soul in the Soliloquia and its defense in De immortalitate animae.” Phronesis 62 (2017): 319354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trout, Dennis E.Augustine at Cassiciacum: Otium honestum and the Social Dimensions of Conversion.” Vigiliae Christianae 42/2 (1988): 132146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valentin, Pierre. “Un protreptique conservé de l’antiquité: le ‘Contra Academicos’ de Saint Augustin.” Revue des Sciences Religieues 43/1 (1969): 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Meeren, Sophie. “La sagesse ‘droit chemin de la vie’: une métaphore du Contra Academicos relue à la lumière du protreptique philosophique.” Revue des Études Augustiniennes 53 (2007): 81111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Fleteren, Frederick. “Authority and Reason, Faith and Understanding in the Thought of St. Augustine.” Augustinian Studies 4 (1973): 3371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Fleteren, Frederick. “The Cassiciacum Dialogues and Augustine’s Ascents at Milan.” Mediaevalia 4 (1978): 5982.Google Scholar
Van Geest, Paul. “Stoic against His Will? Augustine on the Good Life in De Beata Vita and the Praeceptum.” Augustiniana 54 (2004): 533550.Google Scholar
Van Haeringen, Johann Hendrik. De Augustini ante baptismum rusticantis operibus. Groningen: M. de Waal, 1917.Google Scholar
Verhees, Jacques. “Augustins Trinitätsverständnis in den Schriften aus Cassiciacum.” Recherches Augustiniennes 10 (1975): 4575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vlastos, Gregory. “Socrates’ Disavowal of Knowledge.” Philosophical Quarterly 35 (1985): 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vlastos, Gregory. “The Socratic Elenchus.” In Plato, vol. 1, edited by Fine, Gail. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999, 3663.Google Scholar
Vlastos, Gregory. “Socrates’ Disavowal of Knowledge.” In Plato, vol. 2, edited by Fine, Gail. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999, 6492.Google Scholar
Voss, Bernd Reiner. Der Dialog in der frühchristlichen Literatur. Munich: W. Fink, 1970.Google Scholar
Wallis, R. T.Skepticism and Neoplatonism.” Aufstieg und Niedergang der Römischen Welt 36/2 (1987): 911954.Google Scholar
Wartenberg, Thomas. A Sneetch Is a Sneetch and Other Philosophical Discoveries. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wartenberg, Thomas. Big Ideas for Little Kids. New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield, 2014.Google Scholar
Westernik, L., Trouillard, J. and Segonds, A., trans. Prolégomènes à la philosophie de Platon. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1990.Google Scholar
Wetzel, James. Augustine and the Limits of Virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, Susan. “Two Levels of Pluralism.” Ethics 102/4 (1992): 785798,CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Erik Kenyon, Rollins College, Florida
  • Book: Augustine and the Dialogue
  • Online publication: 16 February 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108525558.010
Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Erik Kenyon, Rollins College, Florida
  • Book: Augustine and the Dialogue
  • Online publication: 16 February 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108525558.010
Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Erik Kenyon, Rollins College, Florida
  • Book: Augustine and the Dialogue
  • Online publication: 16 February 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108525558.010
Available formats
×