Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5c569c448b-s84wp Total loading time: 0.593 Render date: 2022-07-04T13:16:47.398Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Chapter 9 - Conclusions and Future Directions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2022

Richard Howard
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
Conor Duggan
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
Get access

Summary

Starting with a discussion of antisocial personality disorder as a diagnostic construct, this chapter argues that models of mental disorders should focus on symptoms (and individual traits) rather than on flawed diagnostic syndromes. It is argued that interpersonal antagonism, callousness and hostility lie at the core of antisocial personality, which is broader than the constructs – ASPD and psychopathy – with which it is traditionally associated. Paranoia and boredom proneness are considered as key elements of antisocial personality. Assessment of antisocial individuals should consider the three aspects of self: self as social actor, self as motivated agent, and self as autobiographical author, as well as their location on the prosocial-antisocial continuum. Arising from the assessment, a case formulation should seek to articulate the central mechanisms that cause and maintain the individual's main problems and to explain how they are related. When an individual shows violent behaviour it is important that the case formulation identifies the type of violence that is shown and the functions it serves. Consistent with the Good Lives Model (GLM), it is important that positive aspects are included in a strength-based case formulation, covering areas such as work, relationships, accommodation, health and leisure activities.

Type
Chapter
Information
Antisocial Personality
Theory, Research, Treatment
, pp. 143 - 157
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Westen, D., Shedler, J., Bradley, B., DeFife, J. A.. An empirically derived taxonomy for personality disorders: Bridging science and practice in conceptualising personality. American Journal of Psychiatry 2012; 169: 273284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith Benjamin, L.. Interpersonal Diagnosis and Treatment of Personality Disorders. New York: Guilford Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Strickland, C. M., Hopwood, C. J, Bornavolova, M. A., Rojas, E. C.. Categorical and dimensional conceptions of personality pathology in DSM-5: Toward a model-based synthesis. Journal of Personality Disorders 2019; 33: 185213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronbach, L. J., Meehl, P. E.. Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin 1955; 52: 281302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lilienfeld, S. O., Watts, A. L., Murphy, B., Costello, T. H., Bowes, S. M., Smith, S. F., Latzman, R. D., Haslam, N., Tabb, K.. Personality disorders as emergent interpersonal syndromes: Psychopathic personality as a case example. Journal of Personality Disorders 2019; 33: 577622.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coid, J. W., Yang, M., Ullrich, S., Zhang, T., Sizmur, S., Farrington, D., Rogers, R.. Most items in structured risk assessment instruments do not predict violence. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology 2011; 22: 321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins-Elder, H., Ward, T.. Describing disorder: The importance and advancement of compositional explanations in psychopathology. Theory & Psychology 2021; in press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helle, A. C., Sher, K. J., Trull, T. J.. Individual symptoms or categorical diagnoses? An epidemiological examination of the association between alcohol use, personality disorders, and psychological symptoms. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenström, T., Torvik, F. A., Ystrom, E., Czajkowski, N. O., Gillespie, N. A., Aggen, S. H., Krueger, R. F., Kendler, K. S, Reichborn-Kjennerud, T.. Prediction of alcohol use disorder using personality disorder traits: A twin study. Addiction 2018; 113: 1524.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vize, C. E., Collison, K. L., Lynam, D. R.. The importance of antagonism: Explaining similarities and differences in psychopathy and narcissism’s relations with aggression and externalizing outcomes. Journal of Personality Disorders 2020; 34: 113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gutiérrez, F., Vicente, E., Aluja, A., Peri, J. M., Gutiérrez-Zotes, A., Baillés, E., Villamon, S. E., Rodríguez, M. A. R., de Alba, A. M., Vall, G., Gallardo-Pujol, D.. Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology – Basic Questionnaire. Personality and Mental Health 2021; 1–13.Google Scholar
Wright, A. G. C., Woods, W. C.. Personalized models of psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 2020; 16: 4974.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Masland, S. R., Shah, T. V., Choi-Kain, L. W.. Boredom in borderline personality disorder: A lost criterion reconsidered. Psychopathology 2020; 53: 239253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mugon, J., Boylan, J., Danckert, J.. Boredom proneness and self-control as unique risk factors in achievement settings. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2020; 17: 9116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tam, K. Y. Y., van Tilburg, W. A. P., Chan, C. S.. What is boredom proneness? A comparison of three characterizations. Journal of Personality 2021; doi: 10.1111/jopy.12618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konjusha, A., Hopwood, C. J., Price, A. L., Masuhr, O., Zimmermann, J.. Investigating the transdiagnostic value of subjective emptiness. Journal of Personality Disorders, https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2021_35_510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eastwood, J., Bambrah, V.. Self-focused but lacking in self-knowledge. The relation between boredom and self-perception. Paper presented at the online 4th International Boredom Conference, 24–26 June 2021.Google Scholar
Muñoz-Negro, J. E., Prudent, C., Gutiérrez, B., Cervilla, J.. Paranoia and risk of personality disorder in the general population. Personality and Mental Health 2019; 13: 107116. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1511.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McMurran, M., Christopher, G.. Dysfunctional beliefs and antisocial personality disorder. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology 2008; 19: 533542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raihani, N., Martinez-Gatell, D., Bell, V., Foulkes, L.. Social reward, punishment, and prosociality in paranoia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 2021; 130: 177185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/abn0000647.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trotta, A. , Kang, J., Stahl, D., Yiend, J.. Interpretation bias in paranoia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychological Science 2021; 9: 323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lam, C. L. M., Mouchlianitis, E., Lee, T. M. C., Yiend, J.. Anxiety mediates the relationship between interpretation bias and paranoia in patients with persistent persecutory beliefs. Anxiety, Stress & Coping. An International Journal 2021; 34: 96106. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2020.1802435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grobbink, L. H., Derksen, J. J. L., van Marle, H. J. C.. Revenge: An analysis of its psychological underpinnings. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 2014; 59: 892907.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Myers, W. C., Lee, E., Montplaisir, R., Lazarou, E., Safarik, M., Chan, H. C., Beauregard, E.. Revenge filicide: An international perspective through 62 cases. Behavioral Sciences and the Law 2021; 39: 205215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Selby, E. A., Joiner, T. E.. Cascades of emotion: The emergence of borderline personality disorder from emotion and behavioural dysregulation. Review of General Psychology 2009; 13: 219229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caprara, G. V., Tisak, M. S., Alessandri, G., Fontaine, R. G., Fida, R., Paciello, M.. The contribution of moral disengagement in mediating individual tendencies toward aggression and violence. Developmental Psychology 2014; 50: 7185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martinelli, C., Cavanagh, K., Dudley, R. E. J.. The impact of rumination on state paranoid ideation in a nonclinical sample. Behavior Therapy 2013; 44: 385394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, R. C.. Psychopathy, impulsiveness and violence: How are they linked? Journal of Behavior 2017; 2: 1004.Google Scholar
Tyrer, P., Mitchard, S., Methuen, C., Ranger, M.. Treatment rejecting and treatment seeking personality disorders: Type R and type S. Journal of Personality Disorders 2003; 17: 263268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bishop, B., Völlm, B., Khalifa, N.. Women with antisocial personality disorder. In: Black, D. W., Kolla, N., eds., Textbook of Antisocial Personality Disorder. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Blashfield, R. K., Keeley, J. W., Flanagan, E. H., Miles, S. R.. The cycle of classification: DSM-I through DSM-5. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 2014; 10: 2551.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wygant, D. B., Sellbom, M., Sleep, C. E., Wall, T. D., Applegate, K. C., Krueger, R. F., Patrick, C. J.. Examining the DSM-5 alternative personality disorder model operationalization of antisocial personality disorder and psychopathy in a male correctional sample. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment 2016; 7: 229239. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hentschel, A. G., Livesley, W. J.. Differentiating normal and disordered personality using the General Assessment of Personality Disorder (GAPD). Personality and Mental Health 2013; 7: 133142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berghuis, H., Kamphuis, J. H., Verheul, R., Larstone, R., Livesley, W. J.. The General Assessment of Personality Disorder (GAPD) as an instrument for assessing the core features of personality disorders. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy 2012; 20: 544557.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steen, A., Berghuis, H., Braam, A. W.. Lack of meaning, purpose and direction in life in personality disorder: A comparative quantitative approach using Livesley’s General Assessment of Personality Disorder. Personality and Mental Health 2019. doi 10.1002/pmh.1446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdams, D. P., McLean, K. C.. Narrative identity. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2013; 22: 233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See, A. Y., Klimstra, T. A., Shiner, R. L., Denissen, J. J. A.. Linking narrative identity with schizotypal personality disorder features in adolescents. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturmey, P., McMurran, M., Daffern, M.. Case formulation and treatment planning. In: Polaschek, D. L. L., Day, A., Hollin, C. R., eds., The Wiley International Handbook of Correctional Psychology. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2019; 476487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purvis, M., Ward, T.. An overview of the Good Lives Model: Theory and evidence. In: Ugwudike, P., Graham, H., McNeill, F., Raynor, P., Taxman, F. S., Trotter, C., eds., The Routledge Companion to Rehabilitative Work in Criminal Justice. New York: Routledge, 2020.Google Scholar
Maruna, S.. Making Good: How Ex-Convicts Reform and Rebuild Their Lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Books, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, T.. Prediction and agency: The role of protective factors in correctional rehabilitation and desistance. Aggression and Violent Behavior 2017; 32: 1928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olver, M. E. , Marshall, L. E., Marshall, W. L., Nicholaichuk, T. P.. A long-term outcome assessment of the effects on subsequent reoffense rates of a prison-based CBT/RNR sex offender treatment program with strength-based elements. Sexual Abuse 2020; 32: 127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilshire, C. E., Ward, T., Clack, S.. Symptom descriptions in psychopathology: How well are they working for us? Clinical Psychological Science. 2020; 9: 323339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, R.. Personality, Values, Culture: An Evolutionary Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×