Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-768ffcd9cc-jpcp9 Total loading time: 0.931 Render date: 2022-12-04T16:54:26.577Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

II - Courts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2022

Martin Krygier
Affiliation:
University of New South Wales, Sydney
Adam Czarnota
Affiliation:
University of New South Wales, Sydney
Wojciech Sadurski
Affiliation:
University of Sydney
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Alterio, M, ‘Reactive v. Structural Approach: A Public Law Response to Populism’ (2019) 8(2) Global Constitutionalism 270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bejarano, A M, and Segura, R, ‘The Difference Power Diffusion Makes: Explaining Divergent Outcomes in Colombia (1990–1991) and Venezuela (1998–1999)’ in Negretto, G (ed), Redrafting Constitutions in Democratic Regimes: Theoretical and Comparative Perspectives (Cambridge University Press, 2020)Google Scholar
Blokker, P, Bugarič, B, and Halmai, G, ‘Introduction: Populist Constitutionalism: Varieties, Complexities and Contradictions’ (2019) 20 German Law Journal 291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braver, J, ‘Hannah Arendt in Venezuela: The Supreme Court Battles Hugo Chávez over the Creation of the 1999 Constitution’ (2016) 14(3) International Journal of Constitutional Law 555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer Carías, A R ‘¿Reforma constitucional o mutación constitucional?: La experiencia venezolana’ [‘Constitutional reform or constitutional mutation?: The Venezuelan experience’] (2007) 137 Revista de Derecho Público 19Google Scholar
Brewer Carías, A R, Dismantling Democracy in Venezuela: The Chavez Authoritarian Experiment (Cambridge University Press, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinks, D, ‘“Faithful Servants of the Regime”: The Brazilian Constitutional Court’s Role under the 1988 Constitution’ in Helmke, G and Ríos-Figueroa, J (eds), Courts in Latin America (Cambridge University Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Bugarič, B, ‘Could Populism be Good for Constitutional Democracy’ (2019) Annual Review of Law and Social Science 41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cañizalez, A, and Matos-Smith, M, ‘El Caso de Globovisión y la implantación del modelo mixto-autoritario en el sistema de medios’ [‘The Globovisión case and the implantation of a mixed-authoritarian model in the media system’] (2015) 59 Iberoamericana 127Google Scholar
Canova González, A, Herrera-Orellana, L A, Rodríguez Ortega, R E, Graterol Stefanelli, G, and Fernández, A C, El TSJ al Servicio de la Revolución [‘The TSJ at the Service of the Revolution’] (Editorial Galipán, 2015)Google Scholar
Capriles, V, Santacruz, A, and Pérez-Perdomo, R, ‘Represión, justicia y derecho en la Venezuela de hoy’ [‘Repression, justice and Law in today’s Venezuela’] (2020) 10(4) Oñati Socio-Legal Series 789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casal, J M, ‘De la Constitucion nominal a la constitucion fachada’ [‘From a nominal constitution to a facade constitution’] in Alvarez, A and Alarcon, B (eds), Venezuela sin Chávez (Universidad Católica Andrés Bello, 2003)Google Scholar
Casal, J M, ‘The Constitutional Chamber and the Erosion of Democracy in Venezuela’ (2021) 80 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht/Heidelberg Journal of International Law 913Google Scholar
Casanueva Baptista, A, and Sánchez Urribarrí, R, ‘Why Populism(s)?’ (2018) 149(1) Thesis Eleven 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colón-Ríos, J, ‘Carl Schmitt and Constituent Power in Latin American Courts: The Cases of Venezuela and Colombia’ (2011) 18 Constellations 365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corrales, J, ‘Autocratic Legalism in Venezuela’ (2015) 26(2) Journal of Democracy 37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corrales, J, ‘Authoritarian Survival: Why Maduro Hasn’t Fallen’ (2020) 31(3) Journal of Democracy 39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corrales, J, and Penfold, M, Dragon in the Tropics: Hugo Chávez and the Political Economy of Revolution in Venezuela (Brookings Latin America Initiative, 2009)Google Scholar
Diamond, L, Plattner, M F, and Walker, C (eds), Authoritarianism Goes Global: The Challenge to Democracy (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2016)Google Scholar
Dixon, R, ‘Introduction – Public Law and Populism’ (2019) 20(2) German Law Journal 125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domingo, P, ‘Judicialization of Politics or Politicization of the Judiciary? Recent Trends in Latin America’ (2004) 11(1) Democratization 104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dressel, B, Sánchez Urribarrí, R, and Stroh, A, ‘The Informal Dimension of Judicial Politics: A Relational Perspective’ (2017) 13 Annual Review of Law and Social Science 413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gómez Gamboa, D ADecisión No. 957 de la Sala Constitucional del TSJ: Caso RCTV’ [‘Decision 957 of the TSJ’s Constitutional Chamber: The RCTV case’] (2008) 15(1) Frónesis 177Google Scholar
Hawkins, K, Venezuela’s Chavismo and Populism in Comparative Perspective (Cambridge University Press, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmke, G, and Ríos-Figueroa, J, ‘Introduction: Courts in Latin America’ in Helmke, G and Ríos-Figueroa, J (eds), Courts in Latin America (Cambridge University Press, 2018)Google Scholar
Hernández González, J, ‘Justicia constitucional y poder político en Venezuela’ [‘Constitutional justice and political power in Venezuela’] (2016) Anuario de Derecho Constitucional Latinoamericano 75Google Scholar
Hilbink, L, Judges Beyond Politics in Democracy and Dictatorship: Lessons from Chile (Cambridge University Press, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschl, R, ‘The Judicialization of Mega-Politics and the Rise of Political Courts’ (2008) 11 Annual Review of Political Science 93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, R, and Randazzo, K (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Judicial Behavior (Routledge, 2018)Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch Una Década de Chávez: Intolerancia Política y Oportunidades Perdidas para el Progreso de los Derechos Humanos en Venezuela [A Decade Under Chávez: Political Intolerance and Lost Opportunities for Advancing Human Rights in Venezuela] (Report, Human Rights Watch, 18 September 2008) hrw.org/report/2008/09/18/decade-under-chavez/political-intolerance-and-lost-opportunities-advancing-humanGoogle Scholar
Huq, A, and Ginsburg, T, ‘How to Lose a Constitutional Democracy’ (2018) 65 UCLA Law Review 79Google Scholar
Kosar, D, Perils of Judicial Self-Government in Transitional Societies (Cambridge University Press, 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosar, D, and Sipulova, K, ‘How to Fight Court-Packing?’ (2020) 6 Constitutional Studies 133Google Scholar
Landau, D, ‘Abusive Constitutionalism’ (2013) 47 UC Davis Law Review 189Google Scholar
Landau, D, ‘Courts and Constitution Making in Democratic Regimes: A Contextual Approach’ in Negretto, G (ed), Redrafting Constitutions in Democratic Regimes: Theoretical and Comparative Perspectives (Cambridge University Press, 2020)Google Scholar
Levitsky, S, ‘How autocrats can rig the game and damage democracy’ Washington Post (4 January 2019), www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2019/01/04/how-do-you-know-when-a-democracy-has-slipped-over-into-autocracy/Google Scholar
López Maya, M, El Ocaso del Chavismo: Venezuela 2005–2015 [‘The Twilight of Chavismo: Venezuela 2005–2015’] (Editorial Alfa, 2016)Google Scholar
López Maya, M, ‘Populism, 21st Century Socialism and Corruption in Venezuela’ (2018) 149(1) Thesis Eleven 67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louza-Scognamiglio, L, ‘La estrecha y necesaria relación entre independencia judicial, estado de derecho, el respeto de los derechos humanos y democracia: Venezuela como caso de estudio’ [‘The close and necessary relationship between judicial Independence, rule of law, respect to Human Rights and democracy: Venezuela as a case study’] (2007) 72 Acta Sociológica 95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, J, and Macedo, S, ‘Populism and Democratic Theory’ (2019) 15(1) Annual Review of Law and Social Science 59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendoza-Botelho, M, Bernal, A, and Sánchez Urribarrí, R ‘Populist Constitutionalism in the Andes: The Cases of Bolivia, Ecuador and Venezuela’ (Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, September 2017)Google Scholar
Moustafa, T, The Struggle for Constitutional Power: Law, Politics and Economic Development in Egypt (Cambridge University Press, 2008)Google Scholar
Moustafa, T, ‘Law and Courts in Authoritarian Regimes’ (2014) 10 Annual Review of Law and Social Science 281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moustafa, T, and Ginsburg, T, ‘Introduction: The functions of Courts in Authoritarian Politics’ in Ginsburg, T and Moustafa, T (eds), Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes (Cambridge University Press, 2008)Google Scholar
Mudde, C, and Kaltwasser, C Rovira, ‘Studying Populism in Comparative Perspective: Reflections on the Contemporary and Future Research Agenda’ (2018) 51(13) Comparative Political Studies 1667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, J WPopulism and Constitutionalism’ in Rovira Kaltwasser, C, Taggart, P, Ochoa Espejo, P, and Ostiguy, P (eds) Oxford Handbook of Populism (Oxford University Press, 2017)Google Scholar
O’Donnell, G A, ‘Horizontal Accountability in New Democracies’ (1998) 9(3) Journal of Democracy 112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Perdomo, R, ‘Judicialization and Regime Transformation: The Venezuelan Supreme Court’ in Sieder, R, Schjolden, L, and Angell, A (eds), The Judicialization of Politics in Latin America (Palgrave Macmillan, 2005)Google Scholar
Pérez-Perdomo, R, and Santacruz, A, ‘La legitimidad de jueces y legisladores en el estado constitucional de Derecho: la Asamblea Nacional y el Tribunal Supremo Venezolano’ [‘Judges and legislators’ legitimacy in the constitutional state based on the rule of law: The National Assembly and the Venezuelan Supreme Tribunal’] (2016) 39 DOXA: Cuadernos de Filosofía del Derecho 405Google Scholar
Popova, M, Politicized Justice in Emerging Democracies: A Study of Courts in Russia and Ukraine (Cambridge University Press, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prendergast, D, ‘The Judicial Role in Protecting Democracy from Populism’ (2019) 20 German Law Journal 245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reporteros Sin Fronteras por la Libertad de Prensa ‘Venezuela: Cierre de Radio Caracas Televisión: La consolidación de una hegemonía mediática’ [Venezuela: The Closure of Radio Caracas Televisión: The consolidation of media hegemony’] Reporteros sin Fronteras (5 June 2007) rsf.org/es/informes/cierre-de-radio-caracas-television-la-consolidacion-de-una-hegemonia-mediaticaGoogle Scholar
Rovira Kaltwasser, C, Taggart, P A, Ochoa Espejo, P, and Ostiguy, P, ‘Populism: An Overview of the Concept and the State of the Art’ in Rovira Kaltwasser, C, Taggart, P A, Ochoa Espejo, P, and Ostiguy, P (eds) Oxford Handbook of Populism (Oxford University Press, 2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadurski, W, Poland’s Constitutional Breakdown (Oxford University Press, 2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sánchez Urribarrí, R ACourts between Democracy and Hybrid Authoritarianism: Evidence from the Venezuelan Supreme Court’ (2011) 36(4) Law & Social Inquiry 854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sánchez Urribarrí, R AVenezuela 2015: Un régimen híbrido en crisis’ [‘Venezuela 2015: A hybrid regime in crisis’] (2016) 36(1) Revista de Ciencia Política 365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sánchez Urribarrí, R, ‘Between Power and Submissiveness: Constitutional Adjudication in Latin America’ in Dixon, R and Ginsburg, T (eds), Comparative Constitutional Law in Latin America (Edward Elgar, 2017)Google Scholar
Scheppele, Kim Lane, ‘Guardians of the Constitution: Constitutional Court Presidents and the Struggle for the Rule of Law in Post-Soviet Europe’ (2006) 154(6) University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheppele, Kim Lane, ‘Autocratic Legalism’ (2018) 85(2) The University of Chicago Law Review 545Google Scholar
Shapiro, M, Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis (University of Chicago Press, 1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trochev, A, Judging Russia: The Role of the Constitutional Court in Russian Politics, 1990–2006 (Cambridge University Press, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trochev, A, and Ellett, R, ‘Judges and Their Allies’ (2014) 2 Journal of Law and Courts 67CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

‘7 nulidades do processo de impeachment’ [7 nullities in the impeachment process] Justificando (30 August 2016) justificando.com/2016/08/30/7-nulidades-do-processo-de-impeachment/Google Scholar
‘64 por cento reprovam governo Dilma’ [64 per cent disapprove of Dilma’s government] Datafolha Instituto de Pesquisas (29 February 2016) datafolha.folha.uol.com.br/opiniaopublica/2016/02/1744564-64-reprovam-governo-dilma.shtmlGoogle Scholar
Abessa, D A Famá, and Buruaem, L, ‘The Systematic Dismantling of Brazilian Environmental Laws Risks Losses on All Fronts’ (2019) 3 Nature Ecology and Evolution 510CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agência Câmara Notícias, ‘Cunha faz leitura de decisão favorável ao processo de impeachment’ [Cunha reads his decision in favour of impeachment] (3 December 2015) 2.camara.leg.br/camaranoticias/noticias/POLITICA/501201-CUNHA-FAZ-LEITURA-DE-DECISAO-FAVORAVEL-AO-PROCESSO-DE-IMPEACHMENT.htmlGoogle Scholar
‘Apenas 24 por cento da população confia no STF’ [Only 24 per cent of the population trusts the Brazilian Supreme Court] Migalhas (23 October 2017) migalhas.uol.com.br/quentes/267694/apenas-24--da-populacao-confia-no-stfGoogle Scholar
Badaró, G, ‘A conexão no processo penal, segundo o princípio do juiz natural, e sua aplicação nos processos da Operação Lava Jato’ [Connection in penal procedure, according to jus naturale, and its application in the proceedings of the Car Wash Investigation] (2016) 122 Revista Brasileira de Ciencias Criminais 171Google Scholar
Barifouse, R, ‘O que dizem os outros 11 pedidos de impeachment contra Dilma’ [What the other 11 impeachment petitions against Dilma say] BBC News Brasil (17 April 2016) bbc.com/portuguese/noticias/2016/04/160414_outros_pedidos_impeachment_rbGoogle Scholar
Berg, R, ‘Judging Bolsonaro’ Foreign Policy (7 December 2018) foreignpolicy.com/2018/12/07/judging-bolsonaro/Google Scholar
Blee, K M, and Vining, T, Risks and Ethics of Social Movement Research in a Changing Political Climate (Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change Volume 30, Elsevier, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capelo, R, ‘O que diz o pedido de Hélio Bicudo para o impeachment da presidente Dilma Rousseff’ [What the impeachment petition against Dilma Rousseff by Helio Bicudo says] Epoca (4 December 2015) epoca.globo.com/tempo/noticia/2015/12/o-que-diz-o-pedido-de-helio-bicudo-para-o-impeachment-da-presidente-dilma-rousseff.htmlGoogle Scholar
Cesarino, L, ‘On Digital Populism in Brazil’ (2019) PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review 1Google Scholar
Chagas-Bastos, F H, ‘Political Realignment in Brazil: Jair Bolsonaro and the Right Turn’ (2019) Revista de Estudios Sociales 92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chemim, V L, ‘Senado agiu com ativismo legislativo no julgamento de Dilma’ [Senate acted with legislative activism in Dilma’s impeachment] Consultor Jurídico (2 October 2016) conjur.com.br/2016-out-02/vera-chemim-senado-agiu-ativismo-legislativo-julgar-dilmaGoogle Scholar
Cruz, F S, ‘OAB diz que Bolsonaro ataca advocacia com informações falsas’ [Brazilian Bar Association says that Bolsonaro attacks legal practice with false information] Consultor Jurídico (29 June 2019) conjur.com.br/2019-jun-29/oab-bolsonaro-ataca-advocacia-informacoes-falsasGoogle Scholar
‘Cunha faz leitura de decisão favorável ao processo de impeachment’ [Cunha reads his decision in favour of impeachment] Câmara dos Deputados (Agência Câmara de Notícias, 3 December 2015) 2.camara.leg.br/noticias/477292-cunha-faz-leitura-de-decisao-favoravel-ao-processo-de-impeachment/Google Scholar
Daly, Tom, ‘Populism, Public Law, and Democratic Decay in Brazil: Understanding the Rise of Jair Bolsonaro’ (11 March 2019, paper prepared for 14th International Human Rights Researchers’ Workshop, ‘Democratic Backsliding and Human Rights’, 2–3 January 2019) ssrn.com/abstract=3350098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
da Silva, D R, ‘A (super)competência (ilegal) das varas federais especializadas’ [The (illegal) (super) jurisdictional powers of the specialized federal courts] Jusbrasil (2017) canalcienciascriminais.jusbrasil.com.br/artigos/473115774/a-super-competencia-ilegal-das-varas-federais-especializadasGoogle Scholar
de Carvalho, A D Z, ‘Entre o dever da toga e o apoio à farda: independência judicial e imparcialidade no STF durante o regime militar’ [Between the judicial duties and the support of the military: judicial independence and the Brazilian Supreme Court impartiality during the military regime] (2017) 32 Revista Brasileira de Ciencias Sociais 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De La Torre, C, ‘Populism in Latin America’ in Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira, Taggart, Paul, Espejo, Paulina Ochoa, and Ostiguy, Pierre (eds) Oxford Handbook of Populism (Oxford University Press, 2017)Google Scholar
de Moraes, M, and Matais, A, ‘Dilma teve 63 pedidos de impeachment; Temer já tem 18’ [Dilma had 63 petitions for impeachment; Temer already has 18] Estadao (25 May 2017) politica.estadao.com.br/blogs/coluna-do-estadao/dilma-teve-63-pedidos-de-impeachment-temer-ja-tem-18/Google Scholar
De Sa e Silva, F, ‘From Car Wash to Bolsonaro: Law and Lawyers in Brazil’s Illiberal Turn (2014–2018)’ (2020) 47(S1) Journal of Law and Society 90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘De Sarney a Dilma: 25 anos desde a redemocratização’ [From Sarney to Dilma: 25 years since redemocratization] Senado Federal (Senado Notícias, 30 December 2010) senado.leg.br/noticias/materias/2010/12/30/de-sarney-a-dilma-25-anos-desde-a-redemocratizacao/Google Scholar
Dix, R H, ‘Populism: Authoritarian and Democratic’ (1985) 20 Latin American Research Review 29Google Scholar
‘Estatísticas eleitorais 2014’ [2014 election statistics] Tribunal Superior Eleitoral (2014) tse.jus.br/eleicoes/estatisticas/eleicoes/eleicoes-anteriores/estatisticas-candidaturas-2014/estatisticas-eleitorais-2014-eleitoradoGoogle Scholar
Fishman, A, Martins, R M, Demori, L, Santi, A De, and Greenwald, G, ‘Breach of Ethics’ The Intercept (10 June 2019) theintercept.com/2019/06/09/brazil-lula-operation-car-wash-sergio-moroGoogle Scholar
Furtado, H, ‘O “Efeito Bolsonaro”‘ [The Bolsonaro Effect] Open Democracy (19 October 2018) opendemocracy.net/pt/o-efeito-bolsonaro/Google Scholar
Dilma é reeleita presidente e amplia para 16 anos ciclo do PT no poder - notícias em Eleições 2014’ [Dilma is re-elected president and broadens to 16 years PT’s power cycle – 2014 Election news] Globo (26 October 2014) g1.globo.com/politica/eleicoes/2014/noticia/2014/10/dilma-e-reeleita-presidente-e-amplia-para-16-anos-ciclo-do-pt-no-poder.htmGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, T, Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases (Cambridge University Press, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, A, Bolsonaro: La democracia de Brasil en peligro [Bolsonaro: Brazil’s democracy in danger] (Marea, 2019)Google Scholar
Halmai, G, ‘Populism, Authoritarianism and Constitutionalism’ (2019) 3 German Law Journal 296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howse, R, ‘Populism and Its Enemies’ (Paper given at ‘Workshop on Public Law and the New Populism’, Jean Monnet Center, NYU Law School, New York City, 2017)Google Scholar
Hunter, W, and Power, T J, ‘Bolsonaro and Brazil’s Illiberal Backlash’ (2019) 30 Journal of Democracy 68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juenger, F, ‘Forum Shopping, Domestic and International’ (1989) 63 Tulane Law Review 553Google Scholar
Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira, Taggart, Paul, Espejo, Paulina Ochoa, and Ostiguy, PierrePopulism: An Overview of the Concept and the State of the Art’ in Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira, Taggart, Paul, Espejo, Paulina Ochoa, and Ostiguy, Pierre (eds) Oxford Handbook of Populism (Oxford University Press, 2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kovacs, Z, and Diamond, L, ‘How Democratic Is Hungary?’ (2019) 98(5) Foreign AffairsGoogle Scholar
Laclau, E, ‘Populism: What’s in a Name?’ in Panizza, Francisco (ed) Populism and the Mirror of Democracy (Verso, 2005)Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, ‘How Autocrats Can Rig the Game and Damage Democracy’ Washington Post (4 January 2019) washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2019/01/04/how-do-you-know-when-a-democracy-has-slipped-over-into-autocracy/Google Scholar
Levitsky, S, and Ziblatt, D, How Democracies Die (Crown, 2018)Google Scholar
Lodi, R, ‘Pedaladas hermenêuticas no pedido de impeachment de Dilma Rousseff’ [Hermeneutic pedalling in the impeachment petition against Dilma Rousseff] Consultor Jurídico (4 December 2015) conjur.com.br/2015-dez-04/ricardo-lodi-pedaladas-hermeneuticas-pedido-impeachmentGoogle Scholar
Moustafa, T, ‘Law and Courts in Authoritarian Regimes’ (2014) 10 Annual Review of Law and Social Sciences 281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moustafa, T, and Ginsburg, T, ‘Introduction: The Functions of Courts in Authoritarian Politics’ in Ginsburg, Tom and Moustafa, Tamir (eds) Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes (Cambridge University Press, 2008)Google Scholar
Mudde, C, ‘The Populist Zeitgeist’ (2004) 39(4) Government and Opposition 541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Perícia vê ação de Dilma em decretos, mas não identifica nas pedaladas’ [Forensics see Dilma’s actions in decrees, but do not identify fiscal pedalling] Globo (26 June 2016) g1.globo.com/politica/noticia/2016/06/pericia-ve-acao-de-dilma-em-decretos-mas-nao-identifica-nas-pedaladas.htmlGoogle Scholar
Pompeu, L, ‘Moro se demite e diz que Bolsonaro interferiu na PF por preocupação com inquérito no STF’ [Moro resigns and says that Bolsonaro interfered in the Federal Police because of concerns with investigations in the Supreme Court] Congresso em Foco (24 April 2020) congressoemfoco.uol.com.br/governo/moro-anuncia-pedido-de-demissao%20acompanhe-aqui/Google Scholar
Recondo, F, Tanques e togas: o STF e a ditadura militar [Tanks and robes: the Brazilian Supreme Court and the military dictatorship] (Sao Paulo: Compania das Letras, 2018Google Scholar
Resende, L, ‘MP perde prazo para recorrer de decisão que deu foro a Flávio Bolsonaro’ [Prosecutors miss deadline for appeal against decision that gave Flavio Bolsonaro special forum] CNN Brasil (11 August 2020) cnnbrasil.com.br/politica/2020/08/11/mp-perde-prazo-para-recorrer-de-decisao-que-deu-foro-a-flavio-bolsonaroGoogle Scholar
Sadurski, W, Poland’s Constitutional Breakdown (Oxford University Press, 2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saint-Clair, C, Bolsonaro: o homem que peitou o exército e desafia a democracia [Bolsonaro: the man who fought the army and defies democracy] (Rio de Janeiro: Maquina de Livros, 2018)Google Scholar
Urribarrí, Sánchez, Raul, ACourts between Democracy and Hybrid Authoritarianism: Evidence from the Venezuelan Supreme Court’ (2011) 36 Law and Social Inquiry 854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Senado aprova impeachment, Dilma perde mandato e Temer assume’ [Senate approves impeachment, Dilma loses mandate and Temer takes over] Globo (31 August 2016) g1.globo.com/politica/processo-de-impeachment-de-dilma/noticia/2016/08/senado-aprova-impeachment-dilma-perde-mandato-e-temer-assume.htmlGoogle Scholar
Tavares, J, and Prado, G, ‘Parecer sobre os requisitos jurídicos para o impeachment da Presidente da República’ [Report on the legal requisites of the impeachment of a President] Estadão (26 October 2015) politica.estadao.com.br/blogs/fausto-macedo/wp-content/uploads/sites/41/2015/12/Juarez.pdGoogle Scholar
Torres, M G, ‘O golpe, o ato, os juristas e o STF: uma história da recepção da ditadura no campo jurídico.’ [The coup, the actions, the lawyers and the Supreme Court: a history of the reception of the dictatorship in the legal field] (2016) 4 Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia 47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tribunal Superior Eleitoral, ‘Estatísticas eleitorais 2014’ [2014 election statistics] (2014) tse.jus.br/eleicoes/estatisticas/eleicoes/eleicoes-anteriores/estatisticas-candidaturas-2014/estatisticas-eleitorais-2014-eleitoradoGoogle Scholar
Urbinati, N, Me The People: How Populism Transforms Democracy (Harvard University Press, 2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Way, Lucan Ahmad, and Levitsky, Steven, ‘How Autocrats Can Rig the Game and Damage Democracy’ Washington Post (4 January 2019) washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2019/01/04/how-do-you-know-when-a-democracy-has-slipped-over-into-autocracy/Google Scholar

References

Arato, Andrew, Post Sovereign Constitution Making: Learning and Legitimacy (Oxford University Press, 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bárd, Petra, ‘To Leave or Not to Leave? Viktor Orbán’s War against George Soros and the CEU Dilemma’ Reconnect Europe (14 February 2019) reconnect-europe.eu/blog/bard-orban-ceudilemma/Google Scholar
Bibó, I, Válogatott tanulmányok 1935–1979. IV. köt. [Selected essays Volume 4] (Magvető Kiadó, 1990), 164Google Scholar
Blokker, Paul, New Democracies in Crisis? (Routledge, 2014)Google Scholar
Boda, Zsolt and Medve-Bálint, Gergő, ‘A rendőrségbe vetett bizalom tényezői’ [Features of confidence in the police] in Boda, Zsolt (ed) Bizalom és közpolitika Jobban működnek-e az intézmények, ha bíznak bennük? [Confidence and public policy. Do the institutions work better if there is trust in them?] (Argumentum–MTA TK Politikatudományi Intézet, 2015)Google Scholar
Bodnár, Eszter, ‘Gedanken über die Einführung der öffentlichen Verhandlung am ungarischen Verfassungsgericht’ [Thoughts about the introduction of a public hearing at the Hungarian Constitutional Court] (2017) 1 Osteuroparecht 65Google Scholar
Bodnár, Eszter, Gárdos-Orosz, Fruzsina and Pozsár-Szentmiklósy, Zoltán, ‘Hungary: The State of Liberal Democracy’ in Albert, Richard, David, Landau, Pietro, Faraguna and Šimon, Drugda (eds) 2017 Global Review of Constitutional Law (Boston: ICONnect-Clough Center, 2018) 129Google Scholar
Csilla, Mihalicz, ‘Interjú Sólyom Lászlóval, az alkotmánybíróság volt elnökével’ [Interview with László Sólyom, former President of the Constitutional Court] (1998) 10 Budapesti Könyvszemle 435Google Scholar
Csink, Lóránt and Fröhlich, Johanna, ‘Történeti alkotmány és kontinuitás az új alaptörvényben’ [Historic constitution and continuity in the new Fundamental Law] (2012) 1 Közjogi Szemle 9Google Scholar
Dezső, Márta, ‘Hungary’ in Alen, André, Haljan, David (eds) International Encyclopedia for Constitutional Law (Kluwer Law International, 2010)Google Scholar
Drinóczi, Tímea, ‘Hungarian Abuse of Constitutional Emergency Regimes – Also in the Light of the COVID-19 Crisis’ (MTA Law Working Paper 2020/13, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, 30 April 2020)Google Scholar
Dupré, Catherine, Importing the Law in Post-communist Transitions: The Hungarian Constitutional Court and the Right to Human Dignity (Hart Publishing, 2003)Google Scholar
Fröhlich, Johanna, ‘Az Abtv. 26. § (2) bekezdése szerinti, közvetlenül a jogszabályok ellen benyújtható alkotmányjogi panaszok befogadhatósága’ [The admissibility of the constitutional complaints directly submitted against legal acts according to Constitutional Court Act § 26 (1)] (2013) 1 Alkotmánybírósági Szemle 90Google Scholar
Fröhlich, Johanna, ‘Az Alkotmánybíróság és a Kúria alkotmányértelmezése. Az Alaptörvény R) és 28. cikkei’ in Az Alaptörvény érvényesülése a bírói gyakorlatban III. Alkotmányjogi panasz - a hatáskörrel kapcsolatos kérdések [The constitutional interpretation of the Constitutional Court and the Kuria. Article R and 28] (Alkotmánybíróság - Kúria - HVG Orac, 2019)Google Scholar
Gárdos-Orosz, Fruzsina, ‘A bírói döntések ellen benyújtott alkotmányjogi panaszok befogadhatósága I. – Az Abtv. 26. § (1) bekezdése’ [The admissibility of constitutional complaints against judicial decisions, Part I – Constitutional Court Act § 26 (1)] (2013) 1 Alkotmánybírósági Szemle 82Google Scholar
Halmai, Gábor, ‘The Hungarian Approach to Constitutional Review: The End of Activism? The First Decade of the Hungarian Constitutional Court’ in Sadurski, Wojciech (ed) Constitutional Justice East and West (Kluwer Law International, 2002)Google Scholar
Halmai, Gábor, ‘In memoriam magyar alkotmánybíráskodás: A pártos Alkotmánybíróság első éve’ [In memoriam Hungarian constitutional review: The first ten years of the partial Constitutional Court] (2014) 1–2 Fundamentum 36Google Scholar
Halmai, Gábor, ‘The Invalid Anti-Migrant Referendum in Hungary’ Verfassungsblog (4 October 2016) verfassungsblog.de/hungarys-anti-european-immigration-laws/Google Scholar
Halmai, Gábor, ‘Abuse of Constitutional Identity. The Hungarian Constitutional Court on Interpretation of Article E) (2) of the Fundamental Law’ (2018) 43 Review of Central and East European Law 23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halmai, Gábor, and Scheppele, Kim Lane, ‘Don’t Be Fooled by Autocrats! Why Hungary’s Emergency Violates Rule of Law’ Verfassungsblog (22 April 2020) verfassungsblog.de/dont-be-fooled-by-autocrats/Google Scholar
Jakab, András, ‘A bírói jogértelmezés az Alaptörvény tükrében’ [Judicial interpretation in the mirror of the Fundamental Law] (2011) 4 Jogesetek Magyarázata 86Google Scholar
Kazai, Viktor Z, ‘No One Has the Right to be Homeless …’ Verfassungsblog (13 June 2019) verfassungsblog.de/no-one-has-the-right-to-be-homeless/Google Scholar
Kelemen, Katalin, ‘The Hungarian Constitutional Court enters the dialogue on national constitutional identity’ Diritti Comparati (30 March 2017) diritticomparati.it/the-hungarian-constitutional-court-enters-the-dialogue-on-national-constitutional-identity/Google Scholar
Kéri, Veronika and Pozsár-Szentmiklósy, Zoltán, ‘Az Alkotmánybíróság határozata az Alaptörvény E) cikkének értelmezéséről. Az alapjogi fenntartás, a szuverenitásvédelem és az alkotmányos identitás dilemmái’ [The decision of the Constitutional Court on the interpretation of Article E of the Fundamental Law. The fundamental right restriction, the protection of sovereignty and the dilemma of constitutional identity] (2017) 1–2 Jogesetek Magyarázata 5Google Scholar
Klein, Claude and Sajó, András, ‘Constitution-Making: Process and Substance’ in Rosenfeld, Michel and Sajó, András (eds) Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar
Paczolay, Péter, ‘The Transformation of Constitutional Court in Hungary’ in Szente, Zoltán, Mandák, Fanni, and Fejes, Zsuzsanna (eds) Challenges and pitfalls in the recent Hungarian constitutional development (L’Harmattan, 2015)Google Scholar
Pozsár-Szentmiklósy, Zoltán, ‘A Kúria végzése a betelepítési kvótáról szóló népszavazási kérdésről: Országgyűlési hatáskör az európai jog homályában’ [The decision of the Kúria on the referendum question about the immigration quota: The competence of the Parliament in the obscurity of the European law] (2016) 1–2 Jogesetek Magyarázata 77Google Scholar
Prendergast, David, ‘The Judicial Role in Protecting Democracy from Populism’ (2019) 20 German Law Journal 245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rixer, Ádám, ‘A történeti alkotmány lehetséges jelentéstartalmai’ [The possible meaning of the historic constitution] (2011) 3 Jogelméleti Szemle jesz.ajk.elte.hu/rixer47.htmlGoogle Scholar
Rozsnyai, Krisztina, ‘Änderungen im System des Verwaltungsrechtsschutzes in Ungarn’ [Changes in the administrative law review system in Hungary] (2013) 9 Die Öffentliche Verwaltung 335Google Scholar
Sadurski, Wojciech, Rights Before Courts: A Study of Constitutional Courts in Postcommunist States of Central and Eastern Europe (Springer, 2nd ed, 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sajó, András, ‘Reading the Invisible Constitution: Judicial Review in Hungary’ (1995) 2 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smuk, Péter, ‘Nemzetfogalom és történelmi narratíva az Alaptörvényben’ [The term nation and historic narrative in the Fundamental Law] in Kecskés, Gábor, (ed) Doktori Műhelytanulmányok 2013 (Győr: Széchenyi István Egyetem Állam- és Jogtudományi Doktori Iskola, 2013) 259Google Scholar
Sólyom, László, Az alkotmánybíráskodás kezdetei Magyarországon [The beginnings of the constitutional adjudication in Hungary] (Budapest, Osiris, 2001)Google Scholar
Sólyom, László, ‘Előszó. Az alkotmányos kultúra szerepe’ [Foreword: The role of the constitutional culture] in Jakab, András, Az új Alaptörvény keletkezése és gyakorlati következményei (HVG-ORAC, 2011)Google Scholar
Sólyom, László, ‘The Rise and Decline of Constitutional Culture in Hungary’ in Bogdandy, Armin von, Sonnevend, Pál (eds), Constitutional Crisis in the European Constitutional Area (Hart Publishing, 2015)Google Scholar
Sólyom, László and Brunner, Georg (eds), Constitutional Judiciary in a New Democracy: The Hungarian Constitutional Court (University of Michigan Press, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somody, Bernadette and Vissy, Beatrix, ‘Citizen’s Role in Constitutional Adjudication in Hungary: From the Actio Popularis to the Constitutional Complaint’ (2012) 53 Annales Universitatis Scientiarum Budapestinensis de Rolando Eötvös Nominatae - Sectio Iuridica 95Google Scholar
Sonnevend, Pál, Jakab, András, and Csink, Lóránt, ‘The Constitution as an Instrument of Everyday Party Politics: The Basic Law of Hungary’ in Bogdandy, Armin von and Sonnevend, Pál (eds) Constitutional Crisis in the European Constitutional Area (Hart Publishing, 2015)Google Scholar
Szente, Zoltán, ‘A 2020. március 11-én kihirdetett veszélyhelyzet alkotmányossági problémái’ [The constitutional problems of the state of emergency announced on 11 March 2020] (MTA Law Working Paper 2020/9, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, 10 April 2020)Google Scholar
Szente, Zoltán, ‘A historizáló alkotmányozás problémái − a történeti alkotmány és a Szent Korona az új Alaptörvényben’ [The problems of history-looking constitution-making] (2011) 3 Közjogi Szemle 1Google Scholar
Szente, Zoltán, ‘The Political Orientation of the Members of the Hungarian Constitutional Court between 2010 and 2014’ (2016) 1 Constitutional Studies 123Google Scholar
Szily, László, ‘Orbán azzal kezdi az új vicces videóját, hogy háromszor is megalázza a totálisan kikészült Patyi Andrást’ (2018) [Orban starts his first funny video by humiliating three times the totally snapped András Patyi] 444.hu/2018/04/13/orban-azzal-kezdi-az-uj-vicces-videojat-hogy-haromszor-is-megalazza-a-totalisan-kikeszult-patyi-andrastGoogle Scholar
Tushnet, Mark and Bugarič, Bojan, ‘Populism and Constitutionalism: An Essay on Definitions and Their Implications’ (21 April 2020) nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:42660123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vincze, Attila, ‘Wrestling with Constitutionalism: The Supermajority and the Hungarian Constitutional Court’ (2014) 8 Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law 86Google Scholar
Vincze, Attila, Csuhány, Péter, Sonnevend, Pál and Jakab, András, ‘32/A. § [Az Alkotmánybíróság]’ in Jakab, András, Az Alkotmány kommentárja (Századvég Kiadó, 2009)Google Scholar
Vörös, Imre, ‘A történeti alkotmány az Alkotmánybíróság gyakorlatában’ [The historic constitution in the practice of the Constitutional Court] (2016) 4 Közjogi Szemle 44Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Courts
  • Edited by Martin Krygier, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Adam Czarnota, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Wojciech Sadurski, University of Sydney
  • Book: Anti-Constitutional Populism
  • Online publication: 24 March 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009031103.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Courts
  • Edited by Martin Krygier, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Adam Czarnota, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Wojciech Sadurski, University of Sydney
  • Book: Anti-Constitutional Populism
  • Online publication: 24 March 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009031103.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Courts
  • Edited by Martin Krygier, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Adam Czarnota, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Wojciech Sadurski, University of Sydney
  • Book: Anti-Constitutional Populism
  • Online publication: 24 March 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009031103.007
Available formats
×