Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T08:12:16.154Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - The invention of promising in the Samoan translation of the Bible

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2014

Alessandro Duranti
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Get access

Summary

To breed an animal with the right to make promises – is not this the paradoxical problem nature has set itself with regard to man? And is it not man’s true problem?

(Friederich Nietzsche, The Genealogy of Morals, Second Essay)

[Morality] has, at least politically, no more to support itself than the good will to counter the enormous risks of action by readiness to forgive and to be forgiven, to make promises and to keep them.

(Hannah Arendt, The Human Condition)

Is promising a human universal?

In the typology of speech acts proposed by Austin (1962) first and then further developed by Searle (1969, 1976), promising was a key example of a commissive – that is, a type of act whereby we commit to doing something (like the acts expressed by the English verbs commit, threaten, vow, pledge, offer, bid, warrant). Such commissives, as discussed in Chapter 2, have among their “felicity conditions” (for Austin) or “conditions of satisfaction” (for Searle) the speaker’s intention to do a number of things, namely, (a) carry out the act, (b) accept responsibility for such an act, (c) be under the obligation of doing it, and (d) convince the hearer that (a), (b), and (c) will be the case by using conventional language that will allow the hearer to fully understand what the speaker is up to.

The act of promising played an important role in Michelle Rosaldo’s (1982) argument that speech act theorists were Anglo- and Eurocentric. Her claim that among the Ilongots there was no notion of promise, or at least not in the sense of an act whose conditions of satisfaction are in the privacy of people’s mind or in their “psychological orientation” (1982: 212), was part of a more general trend in the anthropology of the late 1970s and early 1980s.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Anthropology of Intentions
Language in a World of Others
, pp. 69 - 100
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×