Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-7ccbd9845f-z5z76 Total loading time: 0.794 Render date: 2023-01-30T09:36:06.845Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2022

Paul Kockelman
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Anthropology of Intensity
Language, Culture, and Environment
, pp. 369 - 378
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abraham, W. 1980. The synchronic and diachronic semantics of German temporal noch and schon, with aspects of English still, yet, and already. Studies in Language 4(1):324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agha, A. 2007. Language and Social Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle. 2001a. Categories. In McKeon, R., ed., The Basic Works of Aristotle, pp. 739. New York: Modern Library.Google Scholar
Aristotle. 2001b. Nicomachean Ethics. In McKeon, R., ed., The Basic Works of Aristotle, pp. 1010–12. New York: The Modern Library.Google Scholar
Austin, J. 2003. How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ball, C. 2011. Inalienability in social relations: Language, possession, and exchange in Amazonia. Language in Society 4(3):307–41.Google Scholar
Ball, C. 2014. On dicentization. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 24(2):151–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, C. 2018. Exchanging Words: Language, Ritual, and Relationality in Brazil’s Xingu Indigenous Park. Santa Fe: School for Advanced Research, and Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, J., and Dove, M.. 2015. Climate Cultures: Anthropological Perspectives on Climate Change. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauman, R., and Briggs, C.. 1990. Poetics and performances as critical perspectives on language and social life. Annual Review of Anthropology 19:5988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, S. 2006. There and back again: A semantic analysis. Journal of Semantics 22:351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, W. 1968a. Theses on the philosophy of history. In Arendt, H., ed., Illuminations, pp. 253–64. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
Benjamin, W. 1968b. The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction. In Arendt, H., ed., Illuminations, pp. 217–52. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
Benveniste, É. 1971 [1958]. Categories of thought and language. In Problems in General Linguistics, pp. 5564. Coral Gables: University of Miami Press.Google Scholar
Berendt, C. H. (ed.). 1875. Arte de Lengua Cacchi para Bien Comun. Cobán, Guatemala. Pennsylvania: Berendt-Brinton Linguistic Collection, Rare Book & Manuscript Library, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Berinstein, A. 1985. Evidence for Multiattachment in K’ekchi. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Bergson, H. 1913. Time and Free Will. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Boas, F. 1889. On alternating sounds. American Anthropologist 2:4753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollinger, D. 1972. Degree Words. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buehler, K. L. 1990. The Theory of Language: The Representational Function of Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, W. E. 1960. Time, Tense, and the Verb: A Study in Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, with Particular Attention to Spanish. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Burkitt, R. 1902. Notes on the Kekchí language. American Anthropologist 4(3):441–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkitt, R. 1905. A Kekchí Will of the 16th Century. American Anthropologist 7:271–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkitt, R., and Kaál, T.. 1920. The Hills and the Corn. A Legend of the Kekchí Indians of Guatemala Put in Writing by the Late Tiburtius Kaál and Others and Translated into English. Anthropological Publications, Vol. 3, No. 2. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Carlsen, R. S., and Prechtel, M.. 1991. The flowering of the dead: An interpretation of Highland Maya culture. Man 26(1):2342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnot, S. 1897 [1824]. Reflections on the Motive Power of Heat. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Carruthers, A. 2016. Specters of affinity: Clandestine movement and commensurate values in the Indonesia-Malaysia Borderlands. PhD Dissertation, Yale University.Google Scholar
Carruthers, A. 2017a. Grading qualities and (un)settling equivalences: Undocumented migration, commensuration, and intrusive phonosonics in the Indonesia-Malaysia borderlands. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 27(2):124–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carruthers, A. 2017b. “Their accent would betray them”: Undocumented immigrants and the sound of “illegality” in the Malaysian borderlands. SOJOURN: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia 32(2):221–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carruthers, A. 2019. Policing intensity. Public Culture 31(3):469–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cepek, Michael L. 2018. Life in Oil: Cofán Survival in the Petroleum Fields of Amazonia. Photographs by Bear Guerra. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Chakrabarty, D. 2009. The climate of history: Four theses. Critical Inquiry 35(2):197222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conrad, J. 2007 [1899]. Heart of Darkness. Edited by Knowles, O.. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Cresswell, M. J. 1977. The semantics of degree. In Partee, B., ed., Montague Grammar, pp. 261–92. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 2012. Basic Linguistic Theory. Volume 3: Further Grammatical Topics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Doherty, M. 1973. Noch and schon and their presuppositions. In Kiefer, F. and Ruwet, N., eds., Generative Grammar in Europe, pp. 154–77. Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Douglas, M. 2002 [1966]. Purity and Danger. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dove, M. 2020. Bitter Shade: The Ecological Challenge of Human Consciousness. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Eachus, F., and Carlson, R.. 1980. Aprendamos Kekchi. Guatemala: SIL Publications.Google Scholar
Edwards, T. 2018. Rechanneling language: The mutual restructuring of language and infrastructure among DeafBlind people at Gallaudet University. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 28(3):273–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, T., and Brentari, D.. 2020. Feeling phonology: The conventionalization of phonology in protactile communities in the United States. Language 96(4):819–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elyachar, J. 2010. Phatic labor, infrastructure, and the question of empowerment in Cairo. American Ethnologist 37 (3):452–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enfield, N. J., and Kockelman, P.. 2017. Distributed Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enfield, N. J., and Sidnell, J.. 2017. The Concept of Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enfield, N. J., and Sidnell, J.. 2012. Deixis and the interactional foundations of reference. In Huang, Y., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Pragmatics, pp. 217–39. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Errington, J. J. 1999. Ideology. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 9(102):115–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estrada Monroy, A. 1990. Vida Esotérica Maya-K’ekchí. Guatemala: Edición Cultural.Google Scholar
Estrada Monroy, A. 1979. El Mundo K’ekchi’ de la Vera-Paz. Guatemala: Editorial del Ejército.Google Scholar
Faber, E. J. 2016. Development of a landside risk rating system for small-scale landslides affecting settlements in Guatemala City. MSc thesis, Colorado School of Mines.Google Scholar
Fabricius-Hansen, C. 2001. Wi(e)der and Again(st). In Fery, C. and Sternefeld, W., eds., Audiatur Vox Sapientiae. A Festschrift for Arnim von Stechow, pp. 101–30. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Freeze, R. 1976. Possession in K’ekchi’ (Maya). International Journal of American Linguistics 42(2):113–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeze, R. 1980. A petición of 1619 in K’ekchi’ (Maya). Tlalocan VIII:111–29.Google Scholar
Friedrich, P. 1979. The symbol and its relative non-arbitrariness. In Language, Context, and Imagination, pp. 160. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Friedrich, P. 1986. Language Parallax: Linguistic Relativity and Poetic Indeterminacy. Austin: University of Texas Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, E. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Grandia, L. 2012. Enclosed. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Gros, S., Russell, K., and Stafford, W. F. Jr. 2020. Topology as method. Theorizing the Contemporary Forum. Cultural Anthropology, September 30, https://culanth.org/fieldsights/series/topology-as-method.Google Scholar
Haeserijn, E. V. 1966. Ensayo de la Gramática del K’ekchi’. Purulha, Guatemala: Imprenta Suquinay.Google Scholar
Hanks, W. F. 1990. Referential Practice: Language and Lived Space among the Maya. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Haviland, J. B. 1977. Gossip, Reputation, and Knowledge in Zinacantan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Heath, S. B. 1977. Social history in bilingual education. In Fishman, J. A., ed., Current Perspectives, Volume 1, pp. 5372. Arlington: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Hebdon, C. 2020. Amazonian Ecuador amidst energy transitions. In Loloum, T. and Ortar, N., eds., Ethnographies of Power, pp. 5280. New York and London: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. 1996 [1927]. Being and Time. Translated by Stambaugh, Joan. Albany: SUNY University Press.Google Scholar
Heller, M. 2017. Dr. Esperanto, or anthropology as alternative worlds. American Anthropologist 119(1):1222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, J. H., and Hill, K. C.. 1986. Speaking Mexicano. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. 1994 [1651]. Leviathan. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Hoffmann‐Dilloway, E. 2018. Linguistic Anthropology in 2017: It could be otherwise. American Anthropologist 120(2):278–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, L. 1969. A presuppositional analysis of “only” and “even”. In Papers from the Fifth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, pp. 98107. Chicago: CLS.Google Scholar
Hull, K. M., and Carrasco, M. D.. 2012. Parallel Worlds: Genre, Discourse, and Poetics in Contemporary, Colonial, and Classic Maya Literature. Boulder: University of Colorado Press.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. 1999. Phenomenology of internal time consciousness. In Welton, D., ed., The Essential Husserl, pp. 231–45. Bloomington: Indiana University PressGoogle Scholar
Ippolito, M. 2004. An analysis of “still”. In Young, R. (ed), SALT XIV, pp. 127–44. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Ippolito, M. 2007. On the meaning of some focus-sensitive particles. Natural Language Semantics 5:134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, R. 1990a. Shifters and verbal categories. In Waugh, L. R. and Monville-Burston, M., eds., On Language, pp. 386–92. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. 1990b. The speech event and the functions of language. In Waugh, L. R. and Monville-Burston, M., eds., On Language, pp. 6970. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
James, W. 1975. The experience of time. In Sherover, C. M., ed., The Human Experience of Time: The Development of Its Philosophical Meaning, pp. 367–86. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
James, W. 1985. The self. In Psychology: The Briefer Course, pp. 4383. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, H. 2006. Seeing and Being Seen. Austin: University of Texas Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. 2000 [1790]. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Edited by Guyer, P.. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karttunen, F. 2000. Approaching the semimillennium: Language contact in Latin America. In Casad, E. H. and Willett, T. L., eds., Uto-Aztecan: Structural, Temporal and Geographic Perspectives. Papers in Memory of Wick R. Miller by the Friends of Uto-Aztecan, pp. 387409. Hermosillo: Unison.Google Scholar
Kenyon, J. 1996. Otherwise: New and Selected Poems. Saint Paul: Graywolf Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, C., and McNally, L.. 2005. Scale structure, degree modification, and the semantics of gradable predicates. Language 81(2):345–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kistler, A. 2014. Maya Market Women: Power and Tradition in San Juan Chamelco, Guatemala. Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleidon, A. 2012. How does the Earth system generate and maintain thermodynamic disequilibrium and what does it imply for the future of the planet? Phil Trans A 370:1012–40.Google ScholarPubMed
Kleidon, A. 2010. Life, hierarchy, and the thermodynamic machinery of Planet Earth. Physics of Life Reviews 7:424–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klein, E. 1980. A semantics for positive and comparative adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy 4:145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kockelman, P. 2005. The semiotic stance. Semiotica 157:233304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kockelman, P. 2007. From contract to status revisited. Anthropological Theory 7(2):151–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kockelman, P. 2010a. Language, Culture, and Mind: Natural Constructions and Social Kinds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kockelman, P. 2010b. Enemies, parasites, and noise: How to take up residence in a system without becoming a term in it. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 20(2):406–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kockelman, P. 2011. Biosemiosis, technocognition, and sociogenesis: Significance and selection in a multiverse of sieving and serendipity. Current Anthropology 52(5):711–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kockelman, P. 2012. The ground, the ground, the ground: Why archaeology is so “hard”. Yearbook of Comparative Literature 58:176–83.Google Scholar
Kockelman, P. 2013. Agent, Person, Subject, Self: A Theory of Ontology, Interaction, and Infrastructure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kockelman, P. 2016a. The Chicken and the Quetzal: Incommensurate Ontologies and Portable Values in Guatemala’s Cloud Forests. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Kockelman, P. 2017. The Art of Interpretation in the Age of Computation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kockelman, P. 2019. The role of mas (< Sp. más) in Q’eqchi’: Comparison and degree in a Mayan language. International Journal of American Linguistics 85(3):365–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kockelman, P. 2020a. Kinds of Value: An Experiment in Modal Anthropology. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.Google Scholar
Kockelman, P. 2020b. The epistemic and performative dynamics of machine learning praxis. Signs and Society 8(2):319–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kockelman, P. 2020c. Dual operators, and their doubling, in Q’eqchi’ (Maya). International Journal of American Linguistics. 86(4):449–484.Google Scholar
Kockelman, P., and Bernstein, A.. 2012. Semiotic technologies, temporal reckoning, and the portability of meaning: Or, modern modes of temporality – just how ‘abstract’ are they? Anthropological Theory 12(3):320–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kondepudi, D., and Prigogine, I.. 1998. Modern Thermodynamics: From Heat Engines to Dissipative Structures. Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Kratzer, A. 1977. What “must” and “can” must and can mean. Linguistics and Philosophy 1(3):337–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratzer, A. 1981. The notional category of modality. In Eikmeyer, H. J. and Rieser, H., eds. Words, Worlds, and Contexts: New Approaches in Word Semantics, pp. 874. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kratzer, A. 2012. Modals and Conditionals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kripke, S. 1980. Naming and Necessity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kroskrity, P. V. 1993. Language, History, and Identity: Ethnolinguistic Studies of the Arizona Tewa. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W. 1984. Intensity. Georgetown University Round Table in Linguistics, 1984:4370.Google Scholar
Langdon, S. J. 2007. Tidal pulse fishing. In Menzies, C. R., ed., Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Natural Resource Management, pp. 2246. Oklahoma: Nebraska University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. 2012. Hurricane Sandy: Global warming, pure and simple. Salon, October 31.Google Scholar
Lee, B. 1997. Language, Metalanguage, and the Semiotics of Subjectivity. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, B. 2021. Volatility. In Borch, C. and Wosnitzer, R., eds., The Routledge Handbook of Critical Finance Studies, pp. 4672. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. 1986. On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Loebner, S. 1989. German schon erst noch: An integrated analysis. Linguistics and Philosophy 12:167212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loebner, S. 1999. Why German schon and noch are still duals. Linguistics and Philosophy 22:45107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucy, J. 1992. Grammatical Categories and Cognition: A Case Study of the Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucy, J. 1993. Reflexive language and the human disciplines. In Lucy, J. A., ed., Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics, pp. 133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makihara, M., and Schieffelin, B. B.. 2007. Consequences of Contact: Language Ideologies and Sociocultural Transformations in Pacific Societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, P. 2012. Semiotics of Drink and Drinking. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Massumi, B. 1995. The autonomy of affect. Cultural Critique 31(2):83109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLuhan, M. 1994 [1964]. Understanding Media. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Martyushev, L. M., and Seleznev, V. D.. 2006. Maximum entropy production principle in physics, chemistry and biology. Physics Reports 426:145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, K. 1967 [1867]. Capital. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Maurer, B., Nelms, T. C., and Rea, S. C. 2013. “Bridges to cash”: Channeling agency in mobile money. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 19(1):5274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michaelis, L. A. 1993. “Continuity” within three scalar models: The polysemy of adverbial still. Journal of Semantics 10:193237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondloch, J. L. 1980. K’e?s: Quiche naming. Journal of Mayan Linguistics 2:925.Google Scholar
Munn, N. 1986. The Fame of Gawa: A Symbolic Study of Value Transformation in a Massim Society. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Neisser, U. 1988. Five kinds of self knowledge. Philosophical Psychology 1(1):3559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Regan, J. K. 2010. Why red looks red, rather than sounding like a bell. Humana Mente 14:124.Google Scholar
O’Regan, J. K., and Noë, A.. 2001. A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24(5):883917.Google ScholarPubMed
Palmer, S. E. 1999. Vision Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parmentier, R. J. 1994. Signs in Society: Studies in Semiotic Anthropology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. 1955a. Pragmatism in retrospect: A last formulation. In Buchler, J., ed., Philosophical Writings of Peirce, pp. 269–89. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. 1955b. The principles of phenomenology. In Buchler, J., ed., Philosophical Writings of Peirce, pp. 7497. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Pinkerton, S., ed. 1976. Studies in K’ekchi’. In Texas Linguistics Forum 3. Austin: Department of Linguistics, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Pritzker, S. E., Fenigsen, J., and Wilce, J. M.. 2020. The Routledge Handbook of Language and Emotion. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichenbach, H. 1947. Elements of Symbolic Logic. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Rett, J. 2018. The semantics of many, much, few, and little. Language and Linguistic Compass 12:118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, K. 2020. Facing another: The attenuation of contact as space in Dhofar, Oman. Signs in Society 8(2):290318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sam Juárez, M., Chen Cao, E., Xal Tec, C., Cuc Chen, D., and Tiul Pop, P.. 1997. Diccionario Q’eqchi’. Antigua, Guatemala: Proyecto Lingüístico Francisco Marroquín.Google Scholar
Sapir, E. 1985 [1944]. Grading: A study in semantics. In Mandelbaum, D. G., ed., Selected Writings in Language, Culture, and Personality, pp. 122–49. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sapir, E. 1985 [1944]. The unconscious patterning of behavior in society. In Mandelbaum, D. G., ed., Selected Writings in Language, Culture, and Personality, pp. 544–59. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Schrödinger, E. 1944. What Is Life? The Physical Aspect of the Living Cell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schulthies, B. 2019. Partitioning, phytocommunicability and plant pieties. Anthropology Today 35(2):812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarzschild, R. 2008. The semantics of comparatives and other degree constructions. Language and Linguistic Compass 2:124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedat, W. 1976 [1955]. Nuevo Diccionario de Las Lenguas K’ekchi’ y Española. Reprint. Guatemala: SIL Publications.Google Scholar
Serres, M. 2007 [1980]. The Parasite. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Sethna, J. P. 2006. Statistical Mechanics: Entropy, Order Parameters, and Complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shaw, M. (ed.). 1971. According to Our Ancestors: Folk Tales from Guatemala and Honduras. SIL, Publication 32. Norman: University of Oklahoma.Google Scholar
Shannon, C. E. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal 27:379423, 623–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shayan, S., Öztürk, Ö., and Sicoli, M. A.. 2011. The thickness of pitch: Crossmodal iconicity in three unrelated languages; Farsi, Turkish and Zapotec. Senses and Society 6(1):96105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidnell, J. 2012. Who knows best: Evidential and epistemic certainty in conversation. Pragmatics and Society 3(2):294320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, M. 1976. Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description. In Blunt, B. G., ed., Language, Culture, and Society: A Book of Readings, pp. 187221. Prospect Heights: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. 1981. The Limits of Awareness. Sociolinguistic Working Paper 84. Austin: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. 2004. “Cultural” concepts and the language–culture nexus. Current Anthropology 45(5):621–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, M., and Urban, G. (eds.). 1996. Natural Histories of Discourse. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Simondon, G. 2016 [1958]. On the Mode of Existence of Technical Objects. Translated by Malaspina, Cécile. Minneapolis: Univocal.Google Scholar
Sivaramakrishnan, K. 2015. Ethics of nature in Indian environmental history: A review article. Modern Asian Studies 49(4):1261–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smail, D. L. 2008. On Deep History and the Brain. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Smith, B., and Barad, A.. 2018. Digital gaming and the arts of parental control in southern Peru: Phatic functionality and networks of socialization in processes of language socialization. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 28(3):384–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stalnaker, R. 1973. Presuppositions. Journal of Philosophical Logic 2:447–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stalnaker, R. 2002. Common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy 25:701–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stassen, L. 1985: Comparison and Universal Grammar. Oxford, New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stechow, A. von. 1996. The different readings of wieder “again”: A structural account. Journal of Semantics 13:87118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, D. 1985. The Interpersonal World of the Infant: A View from Psychoanalysis and Developmental Psychology. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
Stewart, K. 2007. Ordinary Affects. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Stewart, S. O. 1980. Gramática Kekchí. Guatemala: Editorial Académica Centro Americana.Google Scholar
Stoll, O. 1896. Die Sprache Der K’e’kchi-Indianer. Paderborn: Verlag.Google Scholar
Stolz, C., and Stolz, T.. 1995. Spanisch-Amerindischer Sprachkontakt: Die Hispanisierung. Iberoamericana 19(2/3, 58/59):542.Google Scholar
Suárez, J. A. 1983. The Mesoamerican Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swenson, R. 1997. Autocatakinetics, evolution, and the law of maximum entropy production: A principled foundation towards the study of human ecology. Advances in Human Ecology 6:147.Google Scholar
Taleb, N. N. 2010. The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. 2000. Towards a Cognitive Semantics, Vol. 1. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tambiah, S. J. 1968. The magic power of words. Man 3(2):175208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tema Bautista, M. P., and Cuz Mucú, A.. 2004. Xtusulal Aatin Sa’ Q’eqchi’ (Vocabulario Q’eqchi’). Guatemala: Academia de Lenguas Mayas de Guatemala.Google Scholar
Thomson, W. 1862. On the age of the Sun’s heat. Macmillan’s Magazine 5:288–93.Google Scholar
Tomlinson, G. 2015. A Million Years of Music: The Emergence of Human Modernity. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uexküll, J. von. 1982. The theory of meaning. Semiotica 42(1):2582.Google Scholar
Ultan, R. 1972. Some Features of Basic Comparative Constructions. Working Papers on Language Universals 9, pp. 117–62. Stanford: Stanford University, Committee on Linguistics.Google Scholar
Urban, G. 1988. Ritual wailing in Amerindian Brazil. American Anthropologist 90(2):385400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urban, G., and Urban, Jessica N. K.. 2020. Affect in the circulation of cultural forms. In S. E. Pritzker, J. Fenigsen, and J. M. Wilce, eds., The Routledge Handbook of Language and Emotion, pp. 75–99. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Webster, A. 2015. Intimate Grammars: An Ethnography of Navajo Poetry. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Weeks, J. M. 2000. The Daniel Garrison Brinton Collection. Retrieved from https://repository.upenn.edu/library_papers/18.Google Scholar
Wells, H. G. 2005 [1895]. The Time Machine. In Miller, J., ed., H. G. Wells: The Dover Reader, pp. 174. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Whitehead, A. N. 1920. The Concept of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Whorf, B. L. 1993 [1939]. The relation of habitual thought to language. In Carroll, J. B., ed., Language, Thought, and Reality, pp. 134–59. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wilk, R. R. 1991. Household Ecology: Economic Change and Domestic Life among the Kekchi Maya in Belize. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. R. 1972. A Highland Maya people and their habitat: The natural history, demography, and economy of the K’ekchi’. PhD dissertation, University of Oregon.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. 1995. Maya Resurgence in Guatemala: Q’eqchi’ Experiences. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Wortham, S., and Reyes, A.. 2015. Discourse Analysis Beyond the Speech Event. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Paul Kockelman, Yale University, Connecticut
  • Book: The Anthropology of Intensity
  • Online publication: 05 May 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024235.018
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Paul Kockelman, Yale University, Connecticut
  • Book: The Anthropology of Intensity
  • Online publication: 05 May 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024235.018
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Paul Kockelman, Yale University, Connecticut
  • Book: The Anthropology of Intensity
  • Online publication: 05 May 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024235.018
Available formats
×