Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-zzcdp Total loading time: 0.446 Render date: 2021-12-08T01:31:26.858Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

Benjamin C. Jantzen
Affiliation:
Virginia College of Technology
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon. 1819. Dialogues on Entomology, in Which the Forms and Habits of Insects Are Familiarly Explained. London: R. Hunter.Google Scholar
Anon 1833. “Bernard Nieuwentyt, the Real Author of Paley’s ‘Natural Theology’.” In The Book of Days: A Miscellany of Popular Antiquities in Connection with the Calendar, ed. Chambers, R., 196–97. London: W. & R. Chambers.Google Scholar
Anon 1848. “Dr. Paley’s ‘Natural Theology’.” The Athenæum, September 9: 907–8.Google Scholar
Anon 1849. “The Charge of Plagiarism against Dr. Paley.” Methodist Quarterly Review 31: 159–61.Google Scholar
Anon 1911. “Paley, William.” In The Encyclopædia Britannica. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Abbott, Cyril E. 1934. “How Megarhyssa Deposits Her Eggs.” Journal of the New York Entomological Society 42, no. 1: 127–33.Google Scholar
Aertsen, Jan A. 1993. “Aquinas’s Philosophy in Its Historical Setting.” In The Cambridge Companion to Aquinas, ed. Kretzmann, Norman and Stump, Eleonore, 12–37. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. 1920. The “Summa theologica” of St. Thomas Aquinas, 10 vols., trans. Fathers of the English Dominican Province. Vol. I, Part I, Qq. I–XXVI. London: Burns Oates & Washbourne.Google Scholar
Ariew, Roger. 2008. “Pierre Duhem.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Zalta, Edward N. (fall 2008 edn.). . Accessed March 10, 2009.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert, ed. 1999. The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baker, Alan. 2011. “Simplicity.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Zalta, Edward N. (summer 2011 edn.). . Accessed September 20, 2013.Google Scholar
Baltzly, Dirk. 2008. “Stoicism.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Zalta, Edward N. (fall 2008 edn.). . Accessed December 30, 2008.Google Scholar
Barrow, John D., and Tipler, Frank J.. 1986. The Anthropic Cosmological Principle. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Behe, Michael. 1996. Darwin’s Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Behe, Michael 2003. “The Modern Intelligent Design Hypothesis.” In God and Design, ed. Manson, Neil, 277–91. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Charles H. 1995. “Logical Depth and Physical Complexity.” In The Universal Turing Machine: A Half-Century Survey, ed. Herken, Rolf, 207–35. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentley, Richard. 1966. Eight Sermons Preached at the Hon. Robert Boyle’s Lecture, in the Year MDCXCII. In The Works of Richard Bentley, D.D., ed. Dyce, Alexander. New York: AMS Press.Google Scholar
Benton, Michael J. 2010. “Studying Function and Behavior in the Fossil Record.” PLoS Biology 8, no. 3: e1000321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berkeley, George. 1803. Alciphron, or the Minute Philosopher. New Haven, CT: Increase Cooke & Co.Google Scholar
Berkeley, George 1901. Alciphron; or, the Minute Philosopher. In The Works of George Berkeley, ed. Fraser, Alexander Campbell, vol. II. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Berman, David. 1988. A History of Atheism in Britain: From Hobbes to Russell. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Blakey, Robert. 1859. Old Faces in New Masks. London: W. Kent & Co.Google Scholar
Boyle, Robert. 1688. A Disquisition about the Final Causes of Natural Things. London: John Taylor.Google Scholar
Burnell, S. Jocelyn Bell. 2004. “Little Green Men, White Dwarfs or Pulsars?Cosmic Search 1, no. 1. . Accessed September 16, 2013.Google Scholar
Cairns-Smith, A. G. 1985. Seven Clues to the Origin of Life. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carr, B. J., and Rees, M. J.. 1979. “The Anthropic Principle and the Structure of the Physical World.” Nature 278: 605–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaitin, Gregory J. 1966. “On the Length of Programs for Computing Finite Binary Sequences.” Journal of the ACM 13, no. 4: 547–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaitin, Gregory J. 1975a. “Randomness and Mathematical Proof.” Scientific American 232, no. 5: 47–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaitin, Gregory J. 1975b. “A Theory of Program Size Formally Identical to Information Theory.” Journal of the ACM 22, no. 3: 329–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaitin, Gregory J. 1977. “Algorithmic Information Theory.” IBM Journal of Research and Development 21: 350–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaitin, Gregory J. 1979. “Toward a Mathematical Definition of ‘Life’.” In The Maximum Entropy Formalism: A Conference Held at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology on May 2–4, 1978, ed. Levine, R. D. and Tribus, M., 477–98. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cicero, . 1998. The Nature of the Gods, trans. Walsh, P. G., Oxford World’s Classics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. Bernard. 1985. Revolution in Science. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Robin. 2003. “Evidence for Fine-Tuning.” In God and Design, ed. Manson, Neil, 178–99. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Robin 2009. “The Teleological Argument: An Exploration of the Fine-Tuning of the Universe.” In The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology, ed. Craig, William Lane and Moreland, James Porter, 202–81. Chichester, UK and Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copleston, Frederick. 1993. A History of Philosophy, 9 vols. Vols. I and V. New York: Image Books.Google Scholar
Cornelis, Guy R. 2006. “The Type III Secretion Injectisome.” Nature Reviews Microbiology 4: 811–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Craig, William Lane. 2003. “Design and the Anthropic Fine-Tuning of the Universe.” In God and Design, ed. Manson, Neil, 155–77. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummins, Robert. 1975. “Functional Analysis.” Journal of Philosophy 72, no. 20: 741–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtis, Helena, and Sue Barnes, N.. 1989. Biology, 5th edn. New York: Worth Publishers.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles. 1838–51. “‘Books to Be Read’ and ‘Books Read’ Notebook.” CUL-DAR119. Transcribed by Kees Rookmaaker. Darwin Online. . Accessed September 13, 2013.
Darwin, Charles 1902. Charles Darwin: His Life Told in an Autobiographical Chapter, and in a Selected Series of His Published Letters, ed. Darwin, Francis, 2nd edn. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles 1993. The Origin of Species, 6th edn. New York: The Modern Library.Google Scholar
Davidson, Herbert A. 1987. Proofs for Eternity, Creation and the Existence of God in Medieval Islamic and Jewish Philosophy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davies, P. C. W. 1992. The Mind of God: The Scientific Basis for a Rational World. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Davies, P. C. W. 2003. “The Appearance of Design in Physics and Cosmology.” In God and Design, ed. Manson, Neil, 147–54. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, P. C. W. 2007. Cosmic Jackpot: Why Our Universe Is Just Right for Life. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Dean, Jeffrey, Aneshansley, Daniel, Edgerton, Harold, and Eisner, Thomas. 1990. “Defensive Spray of the Bombardier Beetle: A Biological Pulse Jet.” Science 248, no. 4960: 1219–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delfgaauw, Bernard. 1968. The Student History of Philosophy, trans. Smith, B. D.. Albany, NY: Magi Books.Google Scholar
Dembski, William A. 2002. No Free Lunch: Why Specified Complexity Cannot Be Purchased without Intelligence. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Dembski, William A. 2004. “The Logical Underpinnings of Intelligent Design.” In Debating Design: From Darwin to DNA, ed. Dembski, William and Ruse, Michael, 311–30. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dembski, William A. 2005. “Specification: The Pattern That Signifies Intelligence.” . Accessed September 10, 2013.
Dembski, William A. 2012. “Design Inference Website.” . Accessed August 6, 2012.
Dembski, William A., and Wells, Jonathan. 2008. The Design of Life: Discovering Signs of Intelligence in Biological Systems. Dallas: Foundation for Thought and Ethics.Google Scholar
Denton, Michael J. 1998. Nature’s Destiny: How the Laws of Biology Reveal Purpose in the Universe. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Denton, Michael, Marshall, Craig, and Legge, Michael. 2001. “The Protein Folds as Platonic Forms: New Support for the Pre-Darwinian Conception of Evolution by Natural Law.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 219: 325–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derham, William. 1760. Select Remains of the Learned John Ray, M.A. and F.R.S. with His Life. London: George Scott.Google Scholar
Derham, William 1786a. Derham’s Physico and Astro Theology; or, a Demonstration of the Being and Attributes of God, 2 vols. Vol. I. London: J. Walter.Google Scholar
Derham, William 1786b. Derham’s Physico and Astro Theology; or, a Demonstration of the Being and Attributes of God, 2 vols. Vol. II. London: J. Walter.Google Scholar
Descartes, René. 2006. A Discourse on the Method of Correctly Conducting One’s Reason and Seeking Truth in the Sciences, trans. Maclean, Ian. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dryden, John, and Clough, A. H.. 1876. Plutarch’s Lives of Illustrious Men. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company.Google Scholar
Dutton, Denis. 2009. The Art Instinct: Beauty, Pleasure, and Human Evolution. New York: Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. W. F. 1972. Likelihood. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Einstein, Albert. 1961. Relativity. New York: Crown Trade Paperbacks.Google Scholar
Eisner, Thomas. 2003. For Love of Insects. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Esposito, John, ed. 1999. The Oxford History of Islam. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Falcon, Andrea. 2012. “Aristotle on Causality.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Zalta, Edward N. (winter 2012 edn.). . Accessed September 20, 2013.Google Scholar
Fee, Jerome. 1941. “Maupertuis, and the Principle of Least Action.” Scientific Monthly 52, no. 6: 496–503.Google Scholar
Feynman, Richard. 1985. QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Frade, Miguel, Fernandez de Vega, F., and Cotta, Carlos. 2008. “Modelling Video Games’ Landscapes by Means of Genetic Terrain Programming – a New Approach for Improving Users’ Experience.” In Applications of Evolutionary Computing, ed. Giacobini, Mario, Brabazon, Anthony, Cagnoni, Stefano, Di Caro, Gianni A., Drechsler, Rolf, Anikó, Ekárt, and Esparcia-Alcázar, Anna I., 485–90. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Alexander Campbell, ed. 1911. Selections from Berkeley, 6th edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Freeth, T., Bitsakis, Y., Moussas, X., Seiradakis, J. H., Tselikas, A., Mangou, H., Zafeiropoulou, M., Hadland, R., Bate, D., Ramsey, A., Allen, M., Crawley, A., Hockley, P., Malzbender, T., Gelb, D., Ambrisco, W., and Edmunds, M. G.. 2006. “Decoding the Ancient Greek Astronomical Calculator Known as the Antikythera Mechanism.” Nature 444: 587–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gardner, Martin. 1986. “WAP, SAP, PAP, & FAP.” New York Review of Books 33, no. 8: 22–25.Google Scholar
Gell-Mann, Murray. 1995. “What Is Complexity?Complexity 1, no. 1: 16–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gell-Mann, Murray, and Lloyd, Seth. 2004. “Effective Complexity.” In Nonextensive Entropy: Interdisciplinary Applications, ed. Gell-Mann, Murray and Tsallis, Constantino, 387–98. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gerson, L. P. 1994. God and Greek Philosophy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gillespie, Neal C. 1990. “Divine Design and the Industrial Revolution: William Paley’s Abortive Reform of Natural Theology.” Isis 81, no. 2: 214–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glass, Marvin, and Wolfe, Julian. 1986. “Paley’s Design Argument for God.” Sophia 25, no. 2: 17–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, Peter. 1993. “Functions: Consensus without Unity.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 74: 196–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grassberger, Peter. 1986. “Toward a Quantitative Theory of Self-Generated Complexity.” International Journal of Theoretical Physics 25, no. 9: 907–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, Ian. 1987. “The Inverse Gambler’s Fallacy: The Argument from Design. The Anthropic Principle Applied to Wheeler Universes.” Mind 96, no. 383: 331–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, David, Resnick, Robert, and Walker, Jearl. 1993. Fundamentals of Physics, 4th edn. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Hansson, Sven Ove. 2008. “Science and Pseudo-Science.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Zalta, Edward N. (fall 2008 edn.). . Accessed March 10, 2009.Google Scholar
Harman, Gilbert. 1965. “The Inference to the Best Explanation.” Philosophical Review 74, no. 1: 88–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrell, Mara. 2010. “Creating Argument Diagrams.” . Accessed August 28, 2010.
Hawkins, Roger. 2012. “Robert Blakey, Part 1.” Morpeth Antiquarian Society, . Accessed December 30, 2012.
Herschel, John F. W. 1831. A Preliminary Discourse on the Study of Natural Philosophy, ed. Lardner, Dionysius, The Cabinet Cyclopaedia. London: Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, and Green.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesse, Mary B. 1964. “Models and Matter.” In Quanta and Reality: A Symposium for the Non-Scientist on the Physical and Philosophical Implications of Quantum Mechanics, ed. British Broadcasting Corporation, 49–57. Cleveland: Meridian Books.Google Scholar
Hick, John. 1963. Philosophy of Religion. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Hicks, L. E. 1883. A Critique of Design-Arguments. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
Hoyle, Fred. 1982. “The Universe: Past and Present Reflections.” Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 20, no. 1: 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoyle, Fred 1983. The Intelligent Universe. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.Google Scholar
Hume, David. 1777. The Life of David Hume. London: W. Strahan and T. Cadell.Google Scholar
Hume, David 1990. Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, ed. Bell, Martin. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Hurlbutt, Robert H. 1965. Hume, Newton, and the Design Argument. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Hutcheson, Francis. 1726. An Inquiry into the Original of Our Ideas of Beauty and Virtue, 2nd edn. London: Printed for J. Darby, A. Bettesworth, F. Fayram, J. Pemberton, C. Rivington, J. Hooke, F. Clay, J. Batley, and E. Symon.Google Scholar
Hyman, Arthur, and Walsh, James J., eds. 1973. Philosophy in the Middle Ages, 2nd edn. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Janet, Paul. 1884. Final Causes, 2nd edn., trans. Flint, Robert. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
Jourdain, Philip E. B. 1913. The Principle of Least Action. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
Juhl, Cory. 2006. “Fine-Tuning Is Not Surprising.” Analysis 66, no. 4: 269–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, Anthony. 1969. The Five Ways: St. Thomas Aquinas’ Proofs of God’s Existence. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
Klee, Robert. 2002. “The Revenge of Pythagoras: How a Mathematical Sharp Practice Undermines the Contemporary Design Argument in Astrophysical Cosmology.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53, no. 3: 331–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kline, A. David. 1993. “Berkeley’s Divine Language Argument.” In George Berkeley, “Alciphron; or, the Minute Philosopher”: In Focus, ed. Berman, David, 185–99. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kolmogorov, Andrei. 1968. “Logical Basis for Information Theory and Probability Theory.” IEEE Transactions of Information Theory IT-14, no. 5: 662–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kretzmann, Norman, and Stump, Eleonore, eds. 1993. The Cambridge Companion to Aquinas. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kühner, Raphael. 1847. Xenophon’s Memorabilia of Sokrates, trans. Wheeler, George B.. London: William Allan.Google Scholar
La Salle, John, Ramadan, Mohsen, and Kumashiro, Bernarr R.. 2009. “A New Parasitoid Wasp of the Erythrina Gall Wasp, Quadrastichus erythrinae Kim (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae).” Zootaxa 2083: 19–26.Google Scholar
Lacey, A. R. 1996. A Dictionary of Philosophy, 3rd edn. New York: Barnes and Noble.Google Scholar
Langer, William L. 1948. An Encyclopedia of World History. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
Lanham, Url. 1964. The Insects. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lempel, Abraham, and Ziv, Jacob. 1976. “On the Complexity of Finite Sequences.” IEEE Transactions of Information Theory IT-22, no. 1: 75–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lennox, James G. 2001. Aristotle’s Philosophy of Biology: Studies in the Origins of Life Science. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leslie, John. 1989. Universes. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Livio, M., Hollowell, D., Weiss, A., and Truran, J. W.. 1989. “The Anthropic Significance of the Existence of an Exrefd State of 12C.” Nature 340, no. 6231: 281–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, Seth. 2001. “Measures of Complexity: A Non-Exhaustive List.” IEEE Control Systems Magazine, August: 7–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, Seth 2002. “Computational Capacity of the Universe.” Physical Review Letters 88, no. 23: 237901.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lloyd, Seth, and Pagels, Heinz. 1988. “Complexity as Thermodynamic Depth.” Annals of Physics 188: 186–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGrew, Timothy, McGrew, Lydia, and Vestrup, Eric. 2003. “Probabilities and the Fine-Tuning Argument: A Skeptical View.” In God and Design, ed. Manson, Neil, 200–8. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKenzie, Donald A. 1915. Myths of Babylonia and Assyria. London: The Gresham Publishing Company.Google Scholar
McKeon, Richard, ed. 1941. The Basic Works of Aristotle. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Maclaurin, Colin. 1750. An Account of Sir Isaac Newton’s Philosophical Discoveries, 2nd edn. London: A. Millar.Google Scholar
Malthus, Thomas. 1960. “A Summary View of the Principle of Population.” In Three Essays on Population. New York: The New American Library.Google Scholar
Mandelbrot, Benoit B. 1983. The Fractal Geometry of Nature. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
Marden, James. 2003. “The Surface-Skimming Hypothesis for the Evolution of Insect Flight.” Acta zoologica cracoviensia 46 (Supplement: Fossil Insects): 73–84.Google Scholar
Marion, Jerry B., and Thornton, Stephen T.. 1995. Classical Dynamics of Particles and Systems, 4th edn. Fort Worth: Saunders College Publishing.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1998. Three Essays on Religion. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Miller, Kenneth R. 2003. “Answering the Biochemical Argument from Design.” In God and Design, ed. Manson, Neil, 292–307. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Perry. 1978. “Bentley and Newton.” In Isaac Newton’s Papers and Letters on Natural Philosophy and Related Documents, ed. Bernard Cohen, I. and Schofield, Robert E., 271–87. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Melanie. 2009. Complexity: A Guided Tour. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, C. Lloyd. 1906. The Interpretation of Nature. New York: The Knickerbocker Press.Google Scholar
Munitz, Milton Karl. 1981. Space, Time, and Creation: Philosophical Aspects of Scientific Cosmology. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac. 1995. The Principia, trans. Motte, Andrew, Great Minds Series. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Nieuwentyt, Bernard. 1721. The Religious Philosopher; or, the Right Use of Contemplating the Works of the Creator, trans. Chamberlayne, John, 2nd edn. London: J. Senex and W. Taylor.Google Scholar
Norton, John D. 2008. “Ignorance and Indifference.” Philosophy of Science 75, no. 1: 45–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oppy, Graham. 2002. “Paley’s Argument for Design.” Philo 5, no. 2: 161–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paley, William. 1802. Natural Theology, 2nd edn. London: R. Faulder.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Seth 2006. Natural Theology, ed. Eddy, Matthew and Knight, David. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parshall, Karen. 1982. “Varieties as Incipient Species: Darwin’s Numerical Analysis.” Journal of the History of Biology 15, no. 2: 191–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pease, Arthur Stanley. 1941. “Caeli Enarrant.” Harvard Theological Review 34, no. 3: 163–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1955. “Abduction and Induction.” In Philosophical Writings of Peirce, ed. Buchler, Justus, 150–56. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Penrose, Roger. 2004. The Road to Reality. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. 1992. “David Berman, A History of Atheism in Britain: From Hobbes to Russell (Book Review).” Journal of the History of Philosophy 30, no. 1: 143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, Karl. 2002. Conjectures and Refutations. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Price, Derek de Solla. 1974. “Gears from the Greeks: The Antikythera Mechanism – a Calendar Computer from Ca. 80 B.C.” Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 64, no. 7: 3–70.Google Scholar
Psillos, Stathis. 2002. Causation and Explanation. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
Quicke, Donald, Wyeth, Paul, Fawke, James D., Basibuyuk, Hasan H., and Vincent, Julian F. V.. 1998. “Manganese and Zinc in the Ovipositors and Mandibles of Hymenopterous Insects.” Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 124: 387–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. 1951. “Two Dogmas of Empiricism.” Philosophical Review 60, no. 1: 20–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratzsch, Del. 2001. Nature, Design, and Science. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Ratzsch, Del 2003. “Perceiving Design.” In God and Design, ed. Manson, Neil A., 124–44. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratzsch, Del 2008. “Teleological Arguments for God’s Existence.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Zalta, Edward N. (fall 2008 edn.). . Accessed February 10, 2009.Google Scholar
Ray, John. 1714. The Wisdom of God Manifested in the Works of the Creation: In Two Parts, 6th edn. London: William Innys.Google Scholar
Reid, Thomas. 1785. Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man. Edinburgh: John Bell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, Thomas 1975. Thomas Reid’s “Inquiry” and “Essays,” ed. Beanblossom, Ronald E. and Lehrer, Keith. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Reid, Thomas 1981. Thomas Reid’s “Lectures on Natural Theology” (1780), ed. Duncan, Elmer H.. Washington, DC: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Riley, C. V. 1888. “The Habits of Thalessa and Tremex.” Insect Life 1, no. 6: 168–79.Google Scholar
Rissanen, J. 1978. “Modeling by Shortest Data Description.” Automatica 14: 465–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruse, Michael. 1999. The Darwinian Revolution, 2nd edn. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sagan, Carl. 1979. Broca’s Brain: Reflections on the Romance of Science. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Sedley, David. 2007. Creationism and Its Critics in Antiquity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Shackel, Nicholas. 2007. “Bertrand’s Paradox and the Principle of Indifference.” Philosophy of Science 74, no. 2: 150–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shupbach, Jonah. 2005. “Paley’s Inductive Inference to Design: A Response to Graham Oppy.” Philosophia Christi 7, no. 2: 491–502.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. 1962. “The Architecture of Complexity.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 106, no. 6: 467–82.Google Scholar
Sinnigen, William G., and Boak, Arthur E. R.. 1977. A History of Rome to A.D. 565. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Smolin, Lee. 1997. The Life of the Cosmos. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Snyder, Laura J. 2009. “William Whewell.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Zalta, Edward N. (winter 2009 edn.). . Accessed September 20, 2013.Google Scholar
Sober, Elliott. 2000. Philosophy of Biology, 2nd edn. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Sober, Elliott 2003. “The Design Argument.” In God and Design, ed. Manson, Neil, 27–54. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, Elliott 2005a. Core Questions in Philosophy, 4th edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Sober, Elliott 2005b. “The Design Argument.” In The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Religion, ed. Mann, William E., 117–47. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Sober, Elliott 2008. Evidence and Evolution: The Logic behind the Science. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomonoff, Ray J. 1964a. “A Formal Theory of Inductive Inference, Part I.” Information and Control 7, no. 1: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomonoff, Ray J. 1964b. “A Formal Theory of Inductive Inference, Part II.” Information and Control 7, no. 2: 224–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steering Committee on Science and Creationism, National Academy of Sciences. 1999. Science and Creationism: A View from the National Academy of Sciences, 2nd edn. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Stenger, Victor J. 2011. The Fallacy of Fine-Tuning: Why the Universe Is Not Designed for Us. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Stone, Graham N., and Cook, James M.. 1998. “The Structure of Cynipid Oak Galls: Patterns in the Evolution of an Extended Phenotype.” Proceedings of the Royal Society London B 265: 979–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swartz, Norman. 2009. “Laws of Nature.” . Accessed May 24, 2013.
Terence, [Publius Terentius Afer]. 1886. Adelphi (The brothers), ed. Sloman, A.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Todhunter, Isaac. 1865. A History of the Mathematical Theory of Probability. Cambridge: Macmillan and Co.Google Scholar
Valentine, M. 1885. Natural Theology; or, Rational Theism, 9th edn. Boston: Silver, Burdett & Co.Google Scholar
van Fraassen, Bas C. 1989. Laws and Symmetry. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Verax.” 1848. “Dr. Paley’s ‘Natural Theology’.” The Athenæum, August 12: 803.
Vickers, John. 2009. “The Problem of Induction.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Zalta, Edward N. (spring 2009 edn.). . Accessed September 20, 2013.Google Scholar
von Mises, Richard. 1981. Probability, Statistics, and Truth. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Waltz, George H., Jr. 1950. “Fooling the Jets for More Speed.” Popular Science, April: 136–38.Google Scholar
Ward, Keith. 2003. “Teleology.” In Encyclopedia of Science and Religion, ed. van Huyssteen, J. Wentzel Vrede, 876–80. New York: Macmillan Reference USA.Google Scholar
Warn, Faith. 2000. Bitter Sea: The Real Story of Greek Sponge Diving. South Woodham Ferrers, UK: Guardian Angel.Google Scholar
Weisheipl, J. 1983. Friar Thomas d’Aquino. His Life, Thought, and Works. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Whewell, William. 1833. Astronomy and General Physics Considered with Reference to Natural Theology. London: William Pickering.Google Scholar
Wright, Larry. 1973. “Functions.” Philosophical Review 82, no. 2: 139–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Benjamin C. Jantzen, Virginia College of Technology
  • Book: An Introduction to Design Arguments
  • Online publication: 05 June 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511793882.022
Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Benjamin C. Jantzen, Virginia College of Technology
  • Book: An Introduction to Design Arguments
  • Online publication: 05 June 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511793882.022
Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Benjamin C. Jantzen, Virginia College of Technology
  • Book: An Introduction to Design Arguments
  • Online publication: 05 June 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511793882.022
Available formats
×