Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-w7rtg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-17T13:12:32.256Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

Paul Burstein
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
American Public Opinion, Advocacy, and Policy in Congress
What the Public Wants and What It Gets
, pp. 209 - 228
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adelman, Robert M., Tsao, Hui-shien, Tolnay, Stewart E., and Crowder, Kyle D.. 2001. “Neighborhood Disadvantage among Racial and Ethnic Groups: Residential Location in 1970 and 1980.” Sociological Quarterly 42: 603–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agnone, Jon. 2007. “Amplifying Public Opinion: The Policy Impact of the U.S. Environmental Movement.” Social Forces 85: 1593–1620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alba, Richard D., and Logan, John. R.. 1992. “Analyzing Locational Attainments: Constructing Individual-Level Regression Models Using Aggregate Data.” Sociological Methods and Research 20: 367–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Althaus, Scott L. 2003. Collective Preferences in Democratic Politics: Opinion Surveys and the Will of the People. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amenta, Edwin, and Caren, Neal. 2004. “The Legislative, Organizational, and Beneficiary Consequences of State-Oriented Challengers.” Pp. 461–88 in The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, edited by Snow, David A., Soule, Sarah A., and Kriesi, Hanspeter. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Amenta, Edwin, Caren, Neal, Chiarello, Elizabeth, and Su, Yang. 2010. “The Political Consequences of Social Movements.” Annual Review of Sociology 36: 287–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amenta, Edwin, Caren, Neal, and Olasky, Sheera Joy. 2005. “Age for Leisure? Political Mediation and the Impact of the Pension Movement on U.S. Old-Age Policy.” American Sociological Review 70: 516–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amenta, Edwin, Caren, Neal, Olasky, Sheera Joy, and Stobaugh, James E.. 2009. “All the Movements Fit to Print: Who, What, When, Where, and Why SMO Families Appeared in the New York Times in the Twentieth Century.” American Sociological Review 74: 636–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amenta, Edwin, Carruthers, Bruce, and Zylan, Yvonne. 1992. “A Hero for the Aged? The Townsend Movement, the Political Mediation Model, and U.S. Old-Age Policy, 1934–1950.” American Journal of Sociology 98: 303–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, Kenneth T. 2001. “Social Movements and Policy Implementation.” American Sociological Review 66: 71–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, Kenneth T., and Edwards, Bob. 2004. “Advocacy Organizations in the U.S. Political Process.” Annual Review of Sociology 30: 479–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, de Figueiredo, John, and Snyder, Jr. James M. 2003. “Why Is There So Little Money in U.S. Politics?Journal of Economic Perspectives 17: 105–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Jones, Philip Edward. 2010. “Constituents’ Responses to Congressional Roll-Call Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 54: 583–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, Rodden, Jonathan, and Snyder, Jr James M.. 2008. “The Strength of Issues: Using Multiple Measures to Gauge Preference Stability, Ideological Constraint, and Issue Voting.” American Political Science Review 102: 215–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, R. Douglas. 1990. The Logic of Congressional Action. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Austen-Smith, David. 1993. “Information and Influence: Lobbying for Agendas and Votes.” American Journal of Political Science 37: 799–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkey, Karen, and Parikh, Sunita. 1991. “Comparative Perspectives on the State.” Annual Review of Sociology 17: 523–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 2005. “Homer Gets a Tax Cut: Inequality and Public Policy in the American Mind.” Perspectives on Politics 3: 15–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., Berry, Jeffrey M., Hojnacki, Marie, Kimball, David C., and Leech, Beth L.. 2009. Lobbying and Public Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Jones, Bryan D.. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., Larsen-Price, Heather A., Leech, Beth L., and Rutledge, Paul. 2011. “Congressional and Presidential Effects on the Demand for Lobbying.” Political Research Quarterly 64: 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Leech, Beth L.. 1998. Basic Interests. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Leech, Beth L. 2001. “Interest Niches and Policy Bandwagons: Patterns of Interest Group Involvement in National Politics.” Journal of Politics 63: 1191–1213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Howard. 1998. Tricks of the Trade: How to Think about Your Research While You’re Doing It. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernhagen, Patrick, and Trani, Brett. 2012. “Interest Group Mobilization and Lobbying Patterns in Britain: A Newspaper Analysis.” Interest Groups and Advocacy 1:48–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Best, Rachel Kahn. 2012. “Disease Politics and Medical Research Funding: Three Ways Advocacy Shapes Policy.” American Sociological Review 77: 780–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boli-Bennett, John, and Meyer, John. 1978. “Ideology of Childhood and the State.” American Sociological Review 43: 797–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, Robert B. 1980. “Motivations in Legislative Information Use.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 5: 393–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Clem, and Manza, Jeff. 2007. Why Welfare States Persist: The Importance of Public Opinion in Democracies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browne, William P., and Ringquist, Delbert J.. 1985. “Sponsorship and Enactment: State Lawmakers and Aging Legislation, 1956–1978.” American Politics Quarterly 13: 447–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burstein, Paul. 1998a. “Interest Organizations, Political Parties, and the Study of Democratic Politics.” Pp. 39–56 in Social Movements and American Political Institutions, edited by Costain, Anne N. and McFarland, Andrew S.. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Burstein, Paul 1998b. Discrimination, Jobs, and Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Burstein, Paul 1998c. “Bringing the Public Back In: Should Sociologists Consider the Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy?Social Forces 77: 27–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burstein, Paul 1999. “Social Movements and Public Policy.” Pp. 3–21 in How Social Movements Matter, edited by Giugni, Marco, McAdam, Doug, and Tilley, Charles. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Burstein, Paul 2002. “Public Opinion and Congressional Action on Labor Market Opportunities, 1942–2000.” Pp. 86–105 in Navigating Public Opinion: Polls, Policy, and the Future of American Democracy, edited by Manza, Jeff, Cook, Fay Lomax, and Page, Benjamin. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burstein, Paul 2003. “The Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy: A Review and an Agenda.” Political Research Quarterly 56: 29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burstein, Paul 2011. “How Our Understanding of Policy Change Is Affected by the Measurement of Public Policy, Hypothetical Determinants of Change, and the Relationship between Them.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Seattle.
Burstein, Paul, Bauldry, Shawn, and Froese, Paul. 2005. “Bill Sponsorship and Congressional Support for Policy Proposals, from Introduction to Enactment or Disappearance.” Political Research Quarterly 58: 295–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burstein, Paul, and Bricher, R. Marie. 1997. “Problem Definition and Public Policy.” Social Forces 76: 135–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burstein, Paul, Bricher, R. Marie, and Einwohner, Rachel L.. 1995. “Policy Alternatives and Political Change: Work, Family, and Gender on the Congressional Agenda, 1945–1990.” American Sociological Review 60: 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burstein, Paul, Einwohner, Rachel, and Hollander, Jocelyn. 1995 “Political Movements and Their Consequences: Lessons from the U.S. Experience.” Pp. 275–95 in The Politics of Social Protest, edited by Jenkins, J. Craig and Klandermans, Bert. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Burstein, Paul, and Freudenburg, William. 1978. “Changing Public Policy: The Impact of Public Opinion, War Costs, and Anti-War Demonstrations on Senate Voting on Vietnam War Motions, 1964–73.” American Journal of Sociology 84: 99–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burstein, Paul, and Hirsh, C. Elizabeth. 2007. “Interest Organizations, Information, and Policy Innovation in the U.S. Congress.” Sociological Forum 22: 174–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burstein, Paul, and Linton, April. 2002. “The Impact of Political Parties, Interest Groups, and Social Movement Organizations on Public Policy.” Social Forces 81: 380–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burstein, Paul, and Sausner, Sarah. 2005. “The Incidence and Impact of Policy-Oriented Collective Action.” Sociological Forum 20: 403–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, James E. 1982. “Cosponsoring Legislation in the U.S. Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 7: 415–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caren, Neal, Ghoshal, Raj Andrew, and Ribas, Vanesa. 2011. “A Social Movement Generation: Cohort and Period Trends in Protest Attendance and Petition Signing.” American Sociological Review 76: 125–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalmers, Adam. 2013. “Trading Information for Access: Informational Lobbying Strategies and Interest Group Access to the European Union.” Journal of European Public Policy 20: 39–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clemens, Elisabeth S. 1997. The People’s Lobby: Organizational Innovation and the Rise of Interest Group Politics in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cmiel, Kenneth. 1999. “The Emergence of Human Rights Politics in the United States.” Journal of American History 86: 1231–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” Pp. 206–61 in Ideology and Discontent, edited by Apter, David E.. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1956 A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A 1989. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
DeGregorio, Christine. 1998. “Assets and Access: Linking Lobbyists and Lawmakers in Congress.” Pp. 137–53 in The Interest Group Connection, edited by Herrnson, Paul S., Shaiko, Ronald G., and Wilcox, Clyde. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.Google Scholar
della Porta, Donatella. 2008. “Protest on Unemployment: Forms and Opportunities.” Mobilization 13: 279–95.Google Scholar
Diermeier, Daniel, and Feddersen, Timothy J.. 2000Information and Congressional Hearings.” American Journal of Political Science 44: 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domhoff, G. William. 1998. Who Rules America? Power and Politics in the Year 2000. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing.Google Scholar
Domhoff, G. William 2002a. Who Rules America? 4th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Domhoff, G. William 2002b. “The Power Elite, Public Policy, and Public Opinion.” Pp. 124–37 in Navigating Public Opinion, edited by Manza, Jeff, Cook, Fay Lomax, and Page, Benjamin I.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
“Dynamics of Collective Action Project.” Stanford University ().
“Dynamics of Collective Protest in the U.S., 1960–1995: Manual for Microfilm Copying and Event Coding.” 2009. ().
Earl, Jennifer, Martin, Andrew, McCarthy, John D., and Soule, Sarah A.. 2004. “The Use of Newspaper Data in the Study of Collective Action.” Annual Review of Sociology 30: 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earl, Jennifer, Soule, Sarah A., and McCarthy, John D.. 2003. “Protest under Fire? Explaining the Policing of Protest.” American Sociological Review 68: 581–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, George C., and Wood, B. Dan. 1999. “Who Influences Whom? The President, Congress, and the Media.” American Political Science Review 93: 327–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Christopher, and Stimson, James A.. 2012. Ideology in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, Robert S. 1976. “The Relationship between Public Opinion and State Policy: A New Look Based on Some Forgotten Data.” American Journal of Political Science 20: 25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, Robert S., MacKuen, Michael B., and Stimson, James A.. 2002. The Macro Polity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert S., Wright, Gerald C., and McIver, John P.. 1993. Statehouse Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fording, Richard C. 2001. “The Political Response to Black Insurgency: A Critical Test of Competing Theories of the State.” American Political Science Review 95: 115–30.Google Scholar
Francia, Peter L. 2010. “Organized Interests: Evolution and Influence.” Pp. 611–28 in The Oxford Handbook of American Elections and Political Behavior, edited by Leighley, Jan E.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frank, David John, Camp, Bayliss J., and Boutcher, Steven A.. 2010. “Worldwide Trends in the Criminal Regulation of Sex, 1945 to 2005.” American Sociological Review 75: 867–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, David John, and McEneaney, Elizabeth H.. 1999. “The Individualization of Society and the Liberalization of State Policies on Same-Sex Sexual Relations, 1984–1995.” Social Forces 77: 911–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamson, William A. 1990 [originally published 1975]. The Strategy of Social Protest. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.Google Scholar
Gamson, William A., and Modigliani, Andre. 1987. “The Changing Culture of Affirmative Action.” Research in Political Sociology 3: 137–77.Google Scholar
Gamson, William A. 1989. “Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power.” American Journal of Sociology 95: 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsberg, Benjamin. 1976. “Elections and Public Policy.” American Political Science Review 70: 41–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gormley, William T., Jr. 1998. “Witnesses for the Revolution.” American Politics Quarterly 26: 174–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granados, Francisco J., and Knoke, David. 2005. “Organized Interest Groups and Policy Networks.” Pp. 287–309 in Handbook of Political Sociology: States, Civil Societies, and Globalization, edited by Janoski, Thomas, Alford, Robert R., Hicks, Alexander M., and Schwartz, Mildred A.. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grattet, Ryken, Jenness, Valerie, and Curry, Theodore R.. 1998. “The Homogenization and Differentiation of Hate Crime Law in the United States, 1978 to 1995.” American Sociological Review 63: 286–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Virginia, and Lowery, David. 2000. The Population Ecology of Interest Representation: Lobbying Communities in the American States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Gray, Virginia, Lowery, David, Fellowes, Matthew, and Anderson, Jennifer L.. 2005. “Legislative Agendas and Interest Advocacy: Understanding the Demand Side of Lobbying.” American Politics Research 33: 404–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Virginia, Lowery, David, Fellowes, Matthew, and McAtee, Andrea. 2004. “Public Opinion, Public Policy, and Organized Interests in the American States.” Political Research Quarterly 57: 411–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Virginia, Lowery, David, and Godwin, Erik K.. 2007. “Public Preferences and Organized Interests in Health Policy: State Pharmacy Assistance Programs as Innovations.” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 32: 89–129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hacker, Jacob S. 2004. “Privatizing Risk without Privatizing the Welfare State: The Hidden Politics of Social Policy Retrenchment in the United States.” American Political Science Review 98: 243–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S., and Pierson, Paul. 2005. “Abandoning the Middle: The Bush Tax Cuts and the Limits of Democratic Control.” Perspectives on Politics 3: 33–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, John Mark. 1991. Gaining Access: Congress and the Farm Lobby, 1919–1981. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hansen, Wendy L., and Mitchell, Neil J.. 2000. “Disaggregating and Explaining Corporate Political Activity: Domestic and Foreign Corporations in National Politics.” American Political Science Review 94: 891–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Frederick, and Gillion, Daniel. 2010. “Expanding the Possibilities: Reconceptualizing Political Participation as a Toolbox.” Pp. 144–61 in The Oxford Handbook of American Elections and Political Behavior, edited by Leighley, Jan E.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hayes, Andrew F., and Krippendorff, Klaus. 2007. “Answering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data.” Communication Methods and Measures 1: 77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heitshusen, Valerie. 2000. “Interest Group Lobbying and U. S. House Decentralization: Linking Informational Focus to Committee Hearing Appearances.” Political Research Quarterly 53: 151–76.Google Scholar
Hero, Rodney E., and Preuhs, Robert R.. 2007. “Immigration and the Evolving Welfare State: Examining Policies in the U.S. States.” American Journal of Political Science 51: 498–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, Alexander, and Misra, Joya. 1993. “Political Resources and the Growth of Welfare in Affluent Capitalist Democracies, 1960–1982.” American Journal of Sociology 99: 668–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilgartner, Steven, and Bosk, Charles. 1988. “The Rise and Fall of Social Problems.” American Journal of Sociology 94: 53–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, Alexander V., and Shotts, Kenneth W.. 2012. “Policy-Specific Information and Informal Agenda Power.” American Journal of Political Science 56: 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horne, Cale. 2012. “The Consistency of Policy with Opinion in the Russian Federation, 1992–2006.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion, & Parties 22: 215–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, Evelyne, and Stephens, John D.. 2000. “Partisan Governance, Women’s Employment, and the Social Democratic Service State.” American Sociological Review 65: 323–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald, and Catterberg, Gabriela. 2002. “Trends in Political Action.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 18: 300–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, David, and Carmichael, Jason T.. 2002. “The Political Sociology of the Death Penalty: A Pooled Time-Series Analysis.” American Sociological Review 67: 109–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, David, and Tope, Daniel. 2007. “The Politics of Resentment in the Post-Civil Rights Era: Minority Threat, Homicide, and Ideological Voting in Congress.” American Journal of Sociology 112: 1458–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Lawrence R., and Mettler, Suzanne. 2011. “Why Public Opinion Changes: The Implications for Health and Health Policy.” Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law 36: 917–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobs, Lawrence R., and Page, Benjamin I.. 2005. “Who Influences U.S. Foreign Policy?American Political Science Review 99: 107–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, J. Craig. 1983. “Resource Mobilization Theory and the Study of Social Movements.” Annual Review of Sociology 9: 527–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, J. Craig, Jacobs, David, and Agnone, Jon. 2003. “Political Opportunities and African-American Protest, 1948–1997.” American Journal of Sociology 109: 277–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, J. Craig, Leicht, Kevin T., and Wendt, Heather. 2006. “Class Forces, Political Institutions, and State Intervention: Subnational Economic Development Policy in the United States, 1971–1990.” American Journal of Sociology 111: 1122–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins-Smith, Hank C., St. Clair, Gilbert K., and Woods, Brian. 1991. “Explaining Change in Policy Subsystems.” American Journal of Political Science 35: 851–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenness, Valerie. 1999. “Managing Differences and Making Legislation.” Social Problems 46: 548–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, Will, and Wlezien, Christopher. 2011. “Distinguishing between Most Important Problems and Issues?Public Opinion Quarterly 75: 545–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jessee, Stephen A. 2009. “Spatial Voting in the 2004 Presidential Election.” American Political Science Review 103: 59–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Charles W. 2003. How Our Laws Are Made. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office (also at ).Google Scholar
Johnson, Diane Elizabeth. 1995Transactions in Symbolic Resources: A Resource Dependence Model of Congressional Deliberation.” Sociological Perspectives 38: 151–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Erik W., Agnone, Jon, and McCarthy, John D.. 2010. “Movement Organizations, Synergistic Tactics, and Environmental Public Policy.” Social Forces 88: 2267–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Bryan D. 1994. Reconceiving Decision-Making in Democratic Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Bryan D., and Baumgartner, Frank R.. 2005. The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Bryan D. 2012. “From There to Here: Punctuated Equilibrium to the General Punctuation Thesis to a Theory of Government Information Processing.” Policy Studies Journal 40: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Bryan D., Larsen-Price, Heather, and Wilkerson, John. 2009. “Representation and American Governing Institutions.” Journal of Politics 71: 277–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Bryan D., Sulkin, Tracy, and Larsen, Heather A.. 2003. “Policy Punctuations in American Political Institutions.” American Political Science Review 97: 151–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Michael D., and Jenkins-Smith, Hank C.. 2009. “Trans-Subsystem Dynamics: Policy Topography, Mass Opinion, and Policy Change.” Policy Studies Journal 37: 37–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Philip Edward. 2011. “Which Buck Stops Here? Accountability for Policy Positions and Policy Outcomes in Congress.” Journal of Politics 73: 764–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, Karen. 2012. “Americans Too Confused by Healthcare Act to Like It, Survey Finds.” Los Angeles Times, October 26. .Google Scholar
Kessler, Daniel, and Krehbiel, Keith. 1996. “Dynamics of Cosponsorship.” American Political Science Review 90: 555–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Brayden G., Bentele, Keith G., and Soule, Sarah Anne. 2007. “Protest and Policymaking: Explaining Fluctuation in Congressional Attention to Rights Issues, 1960–1986.” Social Forces 86: 137–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Brayden G., Cornwall, Marie, and Dahlin, Eric C.. 2005. “Winning Woman Suffrage One Step at a Time: Social Movements and the Logic of the Legislative Process.” Social Forces 83: 1211–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O., and Verba, Sidney. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kingdon, John W. 1981. Congressmen’s Voting Decisions. 2nd edition. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Kingdon, John W 1995. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policy. 2nd edition. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.Google Scholar
Klein, Rudolf, and Marmor, Theodore R.. 2008. “Reflections on Policy Analysis.” Pp. 892–912 in The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, edited by Moran, Michael, Rein, Martin, and Goodin, Robert E.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Knoke, David. 1988. “Incentives in Collective Action Organizations.” American Sociological Review 53: 311–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knoke, David, Pappi, Franz Urban, Broadbent, Jeffrey, and Tsujinaka, Yutaka. 1996. Comparing Policy Networks. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kollman, Ken. 1998. Outside Lobbying: Public Opinion and Interest Group Strategies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Koopmans, Ruud. 2002. “Codebook for the Analysis of Political Mobilisation and Communication in European Public Spheres.” ().
Koopmans, Ruud 2007a. “Who Inhabits the European Public Sphere?European Journal of Political Research 46: 183–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koopmans, Ruud 2007b. “Social Movements.” Pp. 693–707 in Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, edited by Dalton, Russell and Klingemann, Hans-Dieter. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Koopmans, Ruud, and Rucht, Dieter. 2002. “Protest Event Analysis.” Pp. 231–59 in Methods of Social Movement Research, edited by Klandermans, Bert and Staggenborg, Suzanne. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Koopmans, Ruud, and Statham, Paul. 1999. “Political Claims Analysis: Integrating Protest Event and Political Discourse Approaches.” Mobilization 4: 203–22.Google Scholar
Koopmans, Ruud, and Statham, Paul, editors. 2010a. The Making of a European Public Sphere: Media Discourse and Political Contention. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Koopmans, Ruud, and Statham, Paul 2010b. “Theoretical Frameworks, Research Design, and Methods.” Pp. 34–59 in The Making of a European Public Sphere, edited by Koopmans, Ruud and Statham, Paul. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koopmans, Ruud, Statham, Paul, Giugni, Marco, and Passy, Florence. 2005. Contested Citizenship: Immigration and Cultural Diversity in Europe. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 1991. Information and Legislative Organization. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith 1995. “Cosponsors and Wafflers from A to Z.” American Journal of Political Science 39: 906–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter, Koopmans, Ruud, Dyvendak, Jan Willem, and Giugni, Marco G.. 1995. New Social Movements in Western Europe. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Krippendorff, Klaus. 2004. “Reliability in Content Analysis: Some Common Misperceptions and Recommendations.” Human Communication Research 30: 411–33.Google Scholar
Labaton, Stephen. 1991. “House Backs Bailout Bill, Sending It to Bush.” New York Times, late East Coast edition, March 22, p. D1.Google Scholar
Larson, Jeff A., and Soule, Sarah A.. 2009. “Sector-Level Dynamics and Collective Action in the United States, 1965–1975.” Mobilization 14: 293–314.Google Scholar
Laumann, Edward O., and Knoke, David. 1987. The Organizational State. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Lax, Jeffrey R., and Phillips, Justin H.. 2009. “Gay Rights in the States: Public Opinion and Policy Responsiveness.” American Political Science Review 103: 367–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lax, Jeffrey R., and Phillips, Justin H. 2012. “The Democratic Deficit in the States.” American Journal of Political Science 56: 148–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leech, Beth. 2010. “Lobbying and Influence.” Pp. 534–51 in The Oxford Handbook of American Political Parties and Interest Groups, edited by Maisel, L. Sandy and Berry, Jeffrey M.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leifeld, Philip, and Schneider, Volker. 2012. “Information Exchange in Policy Networks.” American Journal of Political Science 56: 731–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lexis-Nexis Congressional Universe. n.d. Dayton, OH: Lexis-Nexis.
Leyden, Kevin M. 1995. “Interest Group Resources and Testimony at Congressional Hearings.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 20: 431–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichbach, Mark Irving. 1995. The Rebel’s Dilemma. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohmann, Susanne. 1993A Signaling Model of Informative and Manipulative Political Action.” American Political Science Review 87: 319–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohmann, Susanne 1994The Dynamics of Information Cascades: The Monday Demonstrations in Leipzig, East Germany, 1989–91.” World Politics 47: 42–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohmann, Susanne 1998. “An Information Rationale for the Power of Special Interests.” American Political Science Review 92: 809–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohmann, Susanne 2003. “Representative Government and Special Interest Politics.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 15: 299–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, J. Scott, and Freese, Jeremy. 2001. Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.Google Scholar
Lopipero, Peggy, Apollonio, Dorie E., and Bero, Lisa A.. 2007–8. “Interest Groups, Lobbying, and Deception: The Tobacco Industry and Airline Smoking.” Political Science Quarterly 122: 635–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowery, David, and Gray, Virginia. 2004. “A Neopluralist Perspective on Research on Organized Interests.” Political Research Quarterly 57: 163–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowery, David, Gray, Virginia, and Baumgartner, Frank R.. 2010. “Policy Attention in State and Nation: Is Anyone Listening to the Laboratories of Democracy?Publius 41: 286–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luskin, Robert C., and Bullock, John G.. 2011. “‘Don’t Know’ Means ‘Don’t Know’: DK Responses and the Public’s Level of Political Knowledge.” Journal of Politics 73: 547–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maier, Pauline. 2011. Ratification: The People Debate the Constitution, 1787–1788. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Manza, Jeff, and Brooks, Clem. 2012. “How Sociology Lost Public Opinion: A Genealogy of a Missing Concept in the Study of the Political.” Sociological Theory 30: 89–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manza, Jeff, and Cook, Fay Lomax. 2002a. “A Democratic Polity? Three Views of Policy Responsiveness to Public Opinion in the United States.” American Politics Research 30: 630–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manza, Jeff, and Cook, Fay Lomax 2002b. “The Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy.” Pp. 17–32 in Navigating Public Opinion, edited by Manza, Jeff, Cook, Fay Lomax, and Page, Benjamin I.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Markoff, John. 1999. “Where and When Was Democracy Invented?Contemporary Studies in Society and History 41 (1999): 660–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattei, Laura R. Winsky. 1998. “Gender and Power in American Legislative Discourse.” Journal of Politics 60: 440–61.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David 1991. Divided We Govern. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug, and Boudet, Hilary Schaffer. 2012. Putting Social Movements in Their Place: Explaining Opposition to Energy Projects in the United States, 2000–2005. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdam, Doug, and Su, Yang. 2002. “The War at Home: Antiwar Protests and Congressional Voting, 1965 to 1973.” American Sociological Review 67: 696–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdam, Doug, Tarrow, Sidney, and Tilly, Charles. 1996. “To Map Contentious Politics.” Mobilization 1: 17–34.Google Scholar
McCammon, Holly J. 2012. The U.S. Women’s Jury Movements and Strategic Adaptation: A More Just Verdict. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCammon, Holly J., Campbell, Karen E., Granberg, Ellen M., and Mowery, Christine. 2001. “How Movements Win: Gendered Opportunity Structures and U.S. Women’s Suffrage Movements, 1866–1919.” American Sociological Review 66: 49–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCammon, Holly J., Chaudhuri, Soma, Hewitt, Lyndi, Muse, Courtney Sanders, and Newman, Harmony D.. 2008. “Becoming Full Citizens: The U.S. Women’s Jury Rights Campaigns, the Pace of Reform, and Strategic Adaptation.” American Journal of Sociology 113: 1104–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCammon, Holly J., Newman, Harmony D., Muse, Courtney Sanders, and Terrell, Teresa M.. 2007. “Movement Framing and Discursive Opportunity Structures: The Political Successes of U.S. Women’s Jury Movements.” American Sociological Review 72: 725–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, John, McPhail, Clark, and Smith, Jackie. 1996. “Images of Protest: Dimensions of Selection Bias in Media Coverage of Washington Demonstrations, 1982 and 1991.” American Sociological Review 61: 478–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, John, and Zald, Mayer. 1977. “Resource Mobilization and Social Movements.” American Journal of Sociology 82: 1212–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, David S., and Minkoff, Debra C.. 2004. “Conceptualizing Political Opportunity.” Social Forces 82: 1457–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monogan, James, Gray, Virgina, and Lowery, David. 2009. “Public Opinion, Organized Interests, and Policy Congruence in Initiative and Noniniative U.S. States.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 9: 304–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monroe, Alan D. 1998. “Public Opinion and Public Policy, 1980–1993.” Public Opinion Quarterly 62: 6–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moran, Michael, Rein, Martin, and Goodin, Robert E., editors. 2008. The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Nam, Taehyun. 2006. “What You Use Matters: Coding Protest Data.” PS: Political Science and Politics 39: 281–87.Google Scholar
Nash, Nathaniel C. 1989a. “Can the U.S. Bail Out Thrifts without Sinking Real Estate?New York Times, 14 May, p. A4.Google Scholar
Nash, Nathaniel C. 1989b. “The Savings and Loan Crisis: ‘Arizona is Lost, Next is San Francisco’.” New York Times, 7 May, p. A2.Google Scholar
Nicholson-Crotty, Sean. 2009. “The Politics of Diffusion: Public Policy in the American States.” Journal of Politics 71: 191–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, Pamela E. 1993. “Formal Models of Collective Action.” Annual Review of Sociology 19: 271–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, Pamela E., and Myers, Daniel J.. 1999. “How Events Enter the Public Sphere: Conflict, Location, and Sponsorship in Local Newspaper Coverage of Public Events.” American Journal of Sociology 105: 38–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1971 [originally published 1965]. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Olzak, Susan. 1989. “Analysis of Events in the Study of Collective Action.” Annual Review of Sociology 15: 119–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olzak, Susan, and Ryo, Emily. 2007. “Organizational Diversity, Vitality, and Outcomes in the Civil Rights Movement.” Social Forces 85: 1561–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olzak, Susan, and Soule, Sarah A.. 2009. “Cross-Cutting Influences of Environmental Protest and Legislation.” Social Forces 88: 201–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Opp, Karl-Dieter. 2009. Theories of Political Protest and Social Movements. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Page, Benjamin I. 2002. “The Semi-Sovereign Public.” Pp. 325–44 in Navigating Public Opinion, edited by Manza, Jeff, Cook, Fay Lomax, and Page, Benjamin I.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Page, Benjamin I., and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 1982. “Changes in Americans’ Policy Preferences, 1935–1979.” Public Opinion Quarterly 46: 24–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, Benjamin I., and Shapiro, Robert Y. 1983. “Effects of Opinion on Policy.” American Political Science Review 77: 175–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, Benjamin I., and Shapiro, Robert Y. 1992. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans’ Policy Preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pampel, Fred C., and Williamson, John B.. 1988. “Welfare Spending in Advanced Industrial Democracies, 1950–1980.” American Journal of Sociology 93:1424–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, Talcott. 1960. Structure and Process in Modern Societies. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2004. Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polsby, Nelson. 1984. Political Innovation in America. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potters, Jan, and Sloof, Randolph. 1996. “Interest Groups: A Survey of Empirical Models That Try to Assess Their Influence.” European Journal of Political Economy 12: 403–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prakash, Aseem, and Gugerty, Mary Kay. 2010. “Advocacy Organizations and Collective Action: An Introduction.” Pp. 1–28 in Advocacy Organizations and Collective Action, edited by Prakash, Aseem and Gugerty, Mary Kay. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proquest LLC. 1990–2012. Ann Arbor, MI: Proquest. ().
Quinn, Jane Bryant. 1999. “Notch Lobby Donations Benefit Only Fund-Raisers.” Sunday Patriot-News (Harrisburg, Pennsylvania), March 21, p. D02.Google Scholar
Rabb, Will. 1990. “Finally in Office, Idea Man Gil Carmichael May Have the Idea to Save Area’s Rail Line.” Mississippi Business Journal, February 26, section 1, p. 10.Google Scholar
Randolph, Eleanor. 1989. “Students Say Colleges Hide Bad News.” San Francisco Chronicle, December 2, p. A8.Google Scholar
Regens, James L. 1989. “Congressional Cosponsorship of Acid Rain Controls.” Social Science Quarterly 70: 505–12.Google Scholar
Riker, William H. 1986. The Art of Political Manipulation. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Riker, William, and Ordeshook, Peter. 1968. “A Theory of the Calculus of Voting.” American Political Science Review 72: 25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenfeld, Rachel, and Ward, Kathryn. 1996. “Evolution of the Contemporary U.S. Women’s Movement.” Pp. 51–73 in Research in Social Movements, Conflict, and Change, edited by Kreisberg, Louis. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Rucht, Dieter. 1999. “The Impact of Environmental Movements in Western Societies.” Pp. 204–24 in How Social Movements Matter, edited by Giugni, Marco, McAdam, Doug, and Tilly, Charles. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Santoro, Wayne A. 2002. “The Civil Rights Movement’s Struggle for Fair Employment: A ‘Dramatic Events-Conventional Politics’ Model.” Social Forces 81: 177–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santoro, Wayne A 2008. “The Civil Rights Movement and the Right to Vote: Black Protest, Segregationist Violence and the Audience.” Social Forces 86: 1391–1414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. 1960. The Semi-Sovereign People. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Schickler, Eric, Pearson, Kathryn, and Feinstein, Brian D.. 2010. “Congressional Parties and Civil Rights Politics from 1933 to 1972.” Journal of Politics 72: 672–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiller, Wendy J. 1995. “Senators as Political Entrepreneurs: Using Bill Sponsorship to Shape Legislative Agendas.” American Journal of Political Science 39: 186–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlozman, Kay Lehman, Verba, Sidney, and Brady, Henry E.. 2012. The Unheavenly Chorus: Unequal Voice and the Broken Promise of American Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Anne and Ingram, Helen. 1988. “Systematically Pinching Ideas.” Journal of Public Policy 8: 61–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroedel, Jean Reith. 1986. “Campaign Contributions and Legislative Outcomes.” Western Political Quarterly 39: 371–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumaker, Paul. 1975. “Policy Responsiveness to Protest Group Demands.” Journal of Politics 37: 488–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuman, Howard, and Presser, Stanley. 1996. Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Scott, William A. 1955. “Reliability of Content Analysis: The Case of Nominal Scale Coding.” Public Opinion Quarterly 19: 321–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., Cameron, Charles M., and Cover, Albert D.. 1992. “A Spatial Model of Roll Call Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 36: 96–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, Mady Wechsler, and Hansen, Amanda Faith. 1992. “Value Rationales in Policy Debates on Women in the Military.” Social Science Quarterly 73: 296–309.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Robert Y. 1998. “Public Opinion, Elites, and Democracy.” Critical Review 12: 501–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Robert Y 2011. “Public Opinion and American Democracy.” Public Opinion Quarterly 75: 982–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shipan, Charles R., and Volden, Craig. 2006. “Bottom-Up Federalism: The Diffusion of Antismoking Policies from U.S. Cities to States.” American Journal of Political Science 50: 825–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinnott, Richard. 2000. “Knowledge and the Position of Attitudes toward a European Foreign Policy on the Real-to-Random Continuum.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 12: 113–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Mark A. 2000. American Business and Political Power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Richard A. 1984. “Advocacy, Interpretation, and Influence in the U.S. Congress.” American Political Science Review 78: 44–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Richard A 1995. “Interest Group Influence in the U.S. Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 20: 89–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sniderman, Paul M., and Grob, Douglas B.. 1996. “Innovations in Experimental Design in Attitude Surveys.” Annual Review of Sociology 22: 377–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snijders, Tom A. B., and Bosker, Roel J.. 1999. Multilevel Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Snow, David A., Soule, Sarah A., and Kriesi, Hanspeter. 2004. “Mapping the Terrain.” Pp. 3–16 in The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, edited by Snow, David A., Soule, Sarah A., and Kriesi, Hanspeter. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soroka, Stuart N., and Wlezien, Christopher. 2005. “Opinion-Policy Dynamics: Public Preferences and Public Expenditure in the United Kingdom.” British Journal of Political Science 35: 665–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soroka, Stuart N., and Wlezien, Christopher 2010. Degrees of Democracy: Politics, Public Opinion, and Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Soule, Sarah A. 1997. “The Student Divestment Movement in the United States and Tactical Diffusion: The Shantytown Protest.” Social Forces 75: 855–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soule, Sarah A., and Earl, Jennifer. 2005. “A Movement Society Evaluated: Collective Protest in the United States, 1960–1986.” Mobilization 10: 345–64.Google Scholar
Soule, Sarah A., McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John, and Su, Yang. 1999. “Protest Events: Cause or Consequence of State Action?Mobilization 4: 239–55.Google Scholar
Soule, Sarah A., and Olzak, Susan. 2004. “When Do Movements Matter? The Politics of Contingency and the Equal Rights Amendment.” American Sociological Review 69: 473–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statham, Paul, and Geddes, Andrew. 2006. “Elites and the ‘Organized Public’: Who Drives British Immigration Politics and in What Direction?West European Politics 29: 248–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, Ronnie J. 1982. Wages and Hours: Labor and Reform in Twentieth-Century America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Stimson, James A. 1999. Public Opinion in America: Moods, Cycles, and Swings. 2nd edition. Westview Press.Google Scholar
Stimson, James A 2004. Tides of Consent: How Public Opinion Shapes American Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stimson, James, MacKuen, Michael B., and Erikson, Robert S.. 1995. “Dynamic Representation.” American Political Science Review 89: 543–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, Deborah. 1989. “Causal Stories and the Formation of Policy Agendas.” Political Science Quarterly 104: 281–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talbert, Jeffrey C., and Potoski, Matthew. 2002. “Setting the Legislative Agenda: The Dimensional Structure of Bill Cosponsoring and Floor Voting.” Journal of Politics 64: 864–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. 1994. Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action, and Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Therien, Jean-Philippe, and Noel, Alain. 2000. “Political Parties and Foreign Aid.” American Political Science Review 94: 151–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1976. “Major Forms of Collective Action in Western Europe, 1500–1975.” Theory and Society 3: 365–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilly, Charles 1997. “Parliamentarization of Popular Contention in Great Britain, 1758–1834.” Theory and Society 26: 245–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilly, Charles 2005. “Introduction to Part II: Invention, Transformation, and Diffusion of the Social Movement Repertoire.” European Review of History 12: 307–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilly, Charles 2008. “Describing, Measuring, and Explaining Struggle.” Qualitative Sociology 31: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilly, Charles, and Tarrow, Sidney. 2007. Contentious Politics. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.Google Scholar
Tolnay, Stewart E., Crowder, Kyle D., and Adelman, Robert M.. 2000. “Narrow and Filthy Alleys of the City? The Residential Settlement Patterns of Black Southern Migrants to the North.” Social Forces 78: 989–1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United States House of Representatives, Committee on Banking, Finance, and Urban Affairs, Subcommittee on Financial Institutions Supervision, Regulation, and Insurance. 1989. Hearing on Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (H.R. 1278), Part 1. CIS number 1989-H241–35.
United States House of Representatives, Committee on Education and Labor, Subcommittee on Postsecondary Education. 1990. Hearing on HR3344, The Crime Awareness and Campus Security Act of 1989. Y 4.Ed 8/1:101–75.
United States Library of Congress, Congressional Research Service. 1998. Vital Statistics on Congress. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Library of Congress.Google Scholar
United States Library of Congress. 2001. Thomas Legislative Information on the Internet. ().Google Scholar
Vasi, Ion Bogdan, and Macy, Michael. 2003. “The Mobilizer’s Dilemma: Crisis, Empowerment, and Collective Action.” Social Forces 81: 983–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Nie, Norman H., and Kim, Jae-on. 1978. Participation and Political Equality: A Seven-Nation Comparison. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Brady, Henry E.. 1995. Voice and Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Walker, Edward T., Martin, Andrew W., and McCarthy, John D.. 2008. “Confronting the State, the Corporation, and the Academy: The Influence of Institutional Targets on Social Movement Repertoires.” American Journal of Sociology 114: 35–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warshaw, Christopher, and Rodden, Jonathan. 2012. “How Should We Measure District-Level Public Opinion on Individual Issues?Journal of Politics 74: 203–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wawro, Gregory. 2000. Legislative Entrepreneurship in the U.S. House of Representatives. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weeks, Elaine L., Boles, Jacqueline M., Garbin, Albeno P., and Blount, John. 1986. “The Transformation of Sexual Harassment from a Private Trouble into a Public Issue.” Sociological Inquiry 56: 432–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilensky, Harold L. 2002. Rich Democracies: Political Economy, Public Policy, and Performance. Berkeley:University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Rick K., and Young, Cheryl D.. 1997. “Cosponsorship in the U.S. Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 22: 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winters, Jeffrey A., and Page, Benjamin I.. 2009. “Oligarchy in the United States?Perspectives on Politics 7: 731–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittman, Donald A. 1995. The Myth of Democratic Failure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wlezien, Christopher. 2004. “Patterns of Representation.” Journal of Politics 66: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wlezien, Christopher 2005. “On the Salience of Political Issues: The Problem with ‘Most Important Problem’.” Electoral Studies 24: 555–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wlezien, Christopher, and Soroka, Stuart N.. 2012. “Political Institutions and the Opinion-Policy Link.” West European Politics 35: 1407–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolley, John T. 2000. “Using Media-Based Data in Studies of Politics.” American Journal of Political Science 44: 156–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wootton, David. 1992. “The Levellers.” Pp. 71–89 in Democracy: The Unfinished Journey, 508 BC to AD 1993, edited by Dunn, John. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Workman, Samuel, Jones, Bryan D., and Jochim, Ashley E.. 2009. “Information Processing and Policy Dynamics.” Policy Studies Journal 37: 75–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, John R. 1996. Interest Groups and Congress. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Zaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Paul Burstein, University of Washington
  • Book: American Public Opinion, Advocacy, and Policy in Congress
  • Online publication: 05 June 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139628723.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Paul Burstein, University of Washington
  • Book: American Public Opinion, Advocacy, and Policy in Congress
  • Online publication: 05 June 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139628723.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Paul Burstein, University of Washington
  • Book: American Public Opinion, Advocacy, and Policy in Congress
  • Online publication: 05 June 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139628723.009
Available formats
×