References

Andrew Arato

doi:10.1017/9781316411315.009

Ackerman, Bruce. The Future of the Liberal Revolution. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Ackerman, Bruce “The Rise of World Constitutionalism.” Virginia Law Review 83, no. 4 (1997): 771–797.Google Scholar

Ackerman, Bruce We the People, Volume 2: Transformations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ackerman, Bruce We the People: Foundations. Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Adams, W.P. The First American Constitutions. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2001.Google Scholar

Adhikari, A. The Bullet and the Ballot Box. The Story of Nepal's Maoist Revolution. London: Verso, 2014.Google Scholar

Al Ali, Zaid. The Struggle for Iraq's Future: How Corruption, Incompetence and Sectarianism have Undermined Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Al Ali, Zaid “The New Egyptian Constitution: an Initial Assessment of its Merits and Flaws,” Open Democracy, 2012.Google Scholar

Al Ali, Zaid “Egypt's Third Constitution in Three Years: a Critical Analysis,” Constitutionnet, December 20, 2013.Google Scholar

Albert, Richard. “Constitutional Handcuffs,” Ariz. St. LJ, 42 (2010): 671–672.Google Scholar

Albert, Richard “Nonconstitutional Amendments” The Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 22 (2009): 5–47.CrossRef Google Scholar

Albert, Richard “The Structure of Constitutional Amendment Rules,” Wake Forest Law Review 49 (2014): 913-at.Google Scholar

Amar, Akhil. “Popular Sovereignty and Constitutional Amendment.” In Amar, Akhil and Levinson, Sanford, Responding to Imperfection: The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995, pp. 89–115.Google Scholar

Ambedkar, B.R. “Basic Features of the Indian Constitution” in Rodrigues, V. ed., The Essential Writings of B.R. Ambedkar. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Anweiler, Oskar. The Soviets: The Russian Workers, Peasants, and Soldiers Councils, 1905–1921. New York: Pantheon Books, 1975.Google Scholar

Arjomand, Said Amir. The Turban for the Crown. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Arjomand, Said Amir “The Islam and Democracy Debate After 2011,” Constellations 20(2) (2013): 302–303.Google Scholar

Arato, Andrew. “A magyar közjogi rendszer két súlyos fogyatékossága,” Magyar Hirlap 1994, May 30.Google Scholar

Arato, Andrew Civil Society, Constitution and Legitimacy. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2000.Google Scholar

Arato, Andrew “Civil Society Against the State: Poland 1980–81,” Telos 47 (1981): 23–47.Google Scholar

Arato, Andrew Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Arato, Andrew “Democratic Constitution-Making and Unfreezing the Turkish Process,” Philosophy & Social Criticism, 36(3–4) (2010): 473–487.Google Scholar

Arato, Andrew “Framed. America's 51 Constitutions and the Crisis of Governance. By Levinson, Sanford. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.” Constellations 20, no. 3 (2013): 503–507.Google Scholar

Arato, Andrew “Good-bye to Dictatorships?,” Social Research, 67(4) (Winter 2000).Google Scholar

Arato, Andrew “International Role in State-Making in Ukraine: The Promise of a Two-Stage Constituent Process,” German Law Journal 16 (2015).Google Scholar

Arato, Andrew “Multi-Track Constitutionalism Beyond Carl Schmitt,” Constellations 18(3) (2011): 324–351.Google Scholar

Arato, Andrew “Political Theology and Populism,” Social Research 80(1) (2013).Google Scholar

Arato, Andrew “Post-Sovereign Constitution-Making in Hungary: After Success, Partial Failure, Now What?,” South African Journal on Human Rights, Vol. 26, Part I, 2010.CrossRef Google Scholar

Arato, Andrew “The Roundtables, Democratic Institutions and the Problem of Justice,” In Bozóki, András, ed. The Roundtable Talks of 1989: The Genesis of Hungarian Democracy. Analysis and Documents. Budapest: Central European University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Arato, Andrew “Választás, koalició és alkotmány.” In Civil társadalom forradalom és alkotmány. Budapest: Új mandátum, 1999, pp. 17–34.Google Scholar

Arato, Andrew & Cohen, Jean. “Banishing the Sovereign? Internal and External Sovereignty in Arendt,” Constellations 16(2) (2009): 307–330.CrossRef Google Scholar

Arato, Andrew & Cohen, Jean Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1992.Google Scholar

Arato, A. and Miklosi, Z. “Constitution Making and Transitional Politics in Hungary.” in Miller, Laurel E., and Aucoin, Louis, eds. Framing the State in Times of Transition: Case Studies in Constitution Making. Washington: USIP, 2010, pp. 350–390.Google Scholar

Arato, Andrew and Tombuș, E.. “Learning from Success, Learning from Failure: South Africa, Hungary, Turkey and Egypt,” Philosophy & Social Criticism. 2013.Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah. On Revolution New York: Viking, 1963.Google Scholar

Atkinson, Doreen. “Brokering a Miracle? The Multiparty Negotiating Forum,” South African Review 7 (1994): 13–43.Google Scholar

Austin, Granville. The Indian Constitution. Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Austin, Granville Working a Democratic Constitution: A History of the Indian Experience. Oxford University Press, USA, 2003.Google Scholar

Awad, Ibrahim. “Breaking out of Authoritarianism: 18 Months of Political Transition in Egypt,” Constellations 20(2) (2013): 275–292.CrossRef Google Scholar

Awad, Ibrahim “Postscript,” Constellations, 20(2) (2013): 293–296.CrossRef Google Scholar

Baduel, P. “Le temps insurrectionnel comme “moment politique”. Tunisie 2011,” Revue internationale de politique comparée 2/2013 (Vol. 20): 33–61.Google Scholar

Baker, Keith. Inventing the French Revolution. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Baker, Keith “Sieyès” and “Sovereignty” In Furet, François and Ozouf, Mona, A Critical Dictionary of the French Revolution. Harvard University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Bamyeh, Mohammed, and Hanafi, Sari. “Introduction to the Special Issue on Arab Uprisings,” International Sociology 344(4). (2015): 343–347.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bastid, Paul. Sieyès et sa pensée. Paris, 1939.Google Scholar

Beaud, Olivier. La puissance de l'état. Paris: PUF, 1994.CrossRef Google Scholar

Beaud, Olivier Théorie de la Fédération. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France-PUF, 2007Google Scholar

Bensel, R. Yankee Leviathan: The Origins of Central State Authority in America, 1859–1877. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Bernal-Pulido, C. “Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments in the Case Study of Colombia: An Analysis of the Justification and Meaning of the Constitutional Replacement Doctrine.” International Journal of Constitutional Law, 11(2): 339–357.Google Scholar

Bernard-Maugiron, N. “Personal Status Law in Egypt.” Promotion of Women's Rights. Egypt. 2010.Google Scholar

Bernhard, M. and Kubik, J.. Twenty Years After Communism: The Politics of Memory and Commemoration. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bishara, M. The Invisible Arab: The Promise and Peril of the Arab Revolutions. New York: Nation Books, 2013.Google Scholar

Blackstone, W. Commentaries on the Laws of England. Chicago: University of Chicago, 2002.Google Scholar

Böckenförde, E.-W. ‘Die verfassunggebende Gewalt des Volkes – Ein Grenzbegriff des Verfassungsrechts’ in Staat, Verfassung, Demokratie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1991.Google Scholar

Bonime-Blanc, A. Spain's Transiton to democracy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Bonime-Blanc, A. “Constitution Making and Democratization. The Spanish Paradigm” in Miller, Laurel E. and Aucoin, Louis, eds., Framing the State in Times of Transition: Case Studies in Constitution Making. Washington, DC: US Institute of Peace Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Boraine, A. A Country Unmasked. Inside South Africa's Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Bozóki, A. et. al. eds, A rendszerváltás forgatókönyve. Budapest: CEU Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Bozóki, A. The Roundtable Talks of 1989: The Genesis of Hungarian Democracy. Budapest: CEU Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Bracher, K.D. The German Dictatorship. New York: Penguin, 1970.Google Scholar

Braver, Joshua. “We, the Mediated People: Revolution, Inclusion, and Unconventional Adaptation in the Creation of Post-Cold War S. American Constitutions,” Yale Law School Doctoral Dissertation.Google Scholar

Brewer-Carías, Allan R. Dismantling Democracy in Venezuela: The Chávez Authoritarian Experiment. Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Brown, Nathan J. “Egypt: A Constitutional Court in an Unconstitutional Setting.” In Frosini, J.O. and Biagi, F., Political and Constitutional Transitions in North Africa. New York: Routledge, 2015), p. 33.Google Scholar

Brown, Nathan J. and Lombardi, Clark. “Islam in Egypt's New Constitution,” Foreign Policy, December 13, 2012.Google Scholar

Buchanan, Allen. Secession and Self Determination. New York: NYU, 2003.Google Scholar

Calda, M. “The Roundtable Talks in Czechoslovakia” in Elster, Jon, ed., The Roundtable Talks and the Breakdown of Communism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Calhoun, John Caldwell, and Lence, Ross M. Union and liberty: The political philosophy of John C. Calhoun. New York: Liberty Fund Inc., 1992.Google Scholar

Canovan, M. The People. London: Polity, 2005.Google Scholar

Casanova, Jose “A spanyolországi demokratikus átalakulás tanulságai” in Bozóki, A., et al. eds., A rendszerváltás forgatókönyve, vol. VII. Budapest: CEU Press, 2000, p. 682.Google Scholar

Carré de Malberg, Raymond. Contribution à la générale Théorie de l Etat. Paris: Dalloz, 2004.Google Scholar

Challand, Benoît. “Citizenship Against the Grain: Locating the Spirit of the Arab Uprisings in Times of Counterrevolution,” Constellations, 20(2) (2013): 169–187.Google Scholar

Childs, D. The Fall of the GDR. London: Longman, 2001.Google Scholar

Choudhry, Sujit, and Stacey, Richard. “Semi-presidentialism as a Form of Government: Lessons for Tunisia,” Center for Constitutional Transitions. 2013.Google Scholar

Christodoulidis, E. and Veitch, S. “Reconciliation as Surrender: Configurations of Responsibility and Memory” in Du Bois, François and Du Bois-Pedain, Antje. Justice and Reconciliation in Post-apartheid South Africa. Cambridge University Press, 2008, pp. 9–36.Google Scholar

Cohen, Jean L. Globalization and Sovereignty. Rethinking Legality, Legitimacy and Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Cole, J. “Egypt's New Left Versus the Military Junta,” Social Research, 79(2) (2012): 487–510.Google Scholar

Colon-Rios, J. Weak Constitutionalism. London: Routledge, 2012.Google Scholar

Colon-Rios, J. “Rousseau, Theorist of the Constituent Power” (forthcoming in 2017 in the Oxford Journal of Legal Studies).Google Scholar

Condorcet, N. “Discours sur les conventions nationales” [August 7, 1791] in Oeuvres, vol. X. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt, 1968. Selected Writings. Indianapolis: Bobbs Merrill, n.d.Google Scholar

Condren, Conal and Lawson, George. Lawson: Politica Sacra et Civilis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Cristi, Renato. “Schmitt on Constituent Power and the Monarchical Principle,” Constellations 18(3) (2011): 352–364.Google Scholar

Davis, D. and le Roux, M.. Precedent and Possibility. The (Ab)use of Law in South Africa. Capetown: Double Storey Books, 2009.Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques. “Declarations of Independence,” New Political Science 7(1) (1986): 7–15.Google Scholar

Dicey, Albert Venn. The Law of the Constitution, 8th ed. [1915].Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1982.Google Scholar

Di Palma, G. To Craft Democracies: an Essay on Democratic Transitions. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Dixon, R., and Landau, D. ‘Transnational Constitutionalism and a Limited Doctrine of Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendment,’ International Journal of Constitutional Law, (2015). 13(3): 606–638.Google Scholar

Dow, D. “The Plain Meaning of Article V.” In Levinson, Sanford ed., Responding to imperfection: the theory and practice of constitutional amendment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Du Bois, Francois and Bois-Pedain, Du eds. Justice and Reconciliation in Post Apartheid South Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Du Bois-Pedain, Antje. “Communicating Criminal and Political Responsibility in the TRC Process” in Bois, Du and Bois-Pedain, Du eds. Justice and Reconciliation in Post Apartheid South Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Ebrahim, H. The Soul of a Nation. Constitution Making in South Africa. Capetown: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Elkins, Zachary, Ginsburg, Tom, and Melton, James. The Endurance of National Constitutions. Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Elster, Jon. “Arguing and Bargaining in Two Constituent Assemblies,” U. Pa. J. Const. L. 2 (1999): 345.Google Scholar

Elster, Jon ed. The Roundtable Talks and the Breakdown of Communism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Elster, Jon “Transition, Constitution-making and Separation in Czechoslovakia,” European Journal of Sociology 36(1) (1995): 105–134.Google Scholar

Elster, Jon Ulysses Unbound: Studies in Rationality, Precommitment, and Constraints. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Elster, Jon “Legislatures as Constituent Assemblies” in Bauman, R. and Kahana, T. eds. The Least Examined Branch: The Role of Legislatures in the Constitutional State. London: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Elster, Jon, Offe, Claus, and Preuss, Ulrich K. Institutional Design in Post-communist Societies: Rebuilding the Ship at Sea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Epstein, L., Knight, J., and Shvetsova, O. “The Role of Constitutional Courts in the Establishment and Maintenance of Democratic Systems of Government,” Law and Society Review, (2001): 117–164.CrossRef Google Scholar

Farrand, M. The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1911.CrossRef Google Scholar

Figueroa, Nicolás. “Counter-Hegemonic Constitutionalism: The Case of Colombia,” Constellations 19(2) (2012): 235–247.Google Scholar

Figueroa, Nicolás A Critique of Populist Jurisprudence: Courts, Democracy, and Constitutional Change in Colombia and Venezuela. New School Doctoral Dissertation. May 2016.Google Scholar

Fossum, J.E. and Menendez, A.J.. The Constitution's Gift. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2011.Google Scholar

Forsyth, Murray. Unions of States: The Theory and Practice of Confederation. London: Burns & Oates, 1981.Google Scholar

, Fox et al. “Lessons of the Colombian Constitutional Reform of 1991.” In Miller, Laurel E. and Aucoin, Louis, eds. Framing the State in Times of Transition: Case Studies in Constitution Making. Washington: USIP, 2010, pp. 81–110.Google Scholar

Foyer, Jean. “The drafting of the French Constitution of 1958.” in Goldwin, Robert A. and Kaufman, Art. Constitution Makers on Constitution Making: the Experience of Eight Nnations. No. 479. American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research (1988): 7–46.Google Scholar

Frank, J. Constituent Moments. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Franklin, Julian. John Locke and the Theory of Sovereignty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Friedman, Steven, ed. The Long Journey: South Africa's Quest for a Negotiated Settlement. Johnnesburg: Ravan Press of South Africa, 1993.Google Scholar

Fritz, C. American Sovereigns: The People and America's Constitutional Tradition Before the Civil War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Furet, François. Interpreting the French Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Furet, François Revolutionary France 1770–1880. London: Blackwell, 1995.Google Scholar

Furet, François “Revolutionary Government” in Furet, F., and Ozouf, M., A Critical Dictionary of the French Revolution. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Furet, François, and Ozouf, Mona. A Critical Dictionary of the French Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Gana, Nouri. The Making of the Tunisian Revolution: Contexts, Architects, Prospects. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Garlicki, Lech, and Garlicka, Z. A.. “Constitution Making, Peace Building, and National Reconciliation: The Experience of Poland.” In Miller, Laurel E. and Aucoin, Louis, eds. Framing the State in Times of Transition: Case Studies in Constitution Making. Washington, DC: USIP, 2010, pp. 350–390.Google Scholar

Gauchet, M. La revolution des pouvoirs. Paris: Gallimard, 1995.Google Scholar

Gicherman, Jessica, “The judicial system in Venezuela & the lack of checks and balances” University of Central Florida Doctoral Dissertation. May 2012.Google Scholar

Gillespie, Michael Allen and Lienesch, Michael, eds. Ratifying the Constitution. University Press of Kansas, 1989.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, T. Judicial Review in New Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, T., Elkins, Z., & Blount, J. “Does the Process of Constitution-making Matter?,” Annual Review of Law and Social Sciences, 5(5), 2009.CrossRef Google Scholar

Glenn, J.K. Framing Democracy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Gobe, E. and Salaymeh, L., “Tunisia's ‘Revolutionary’ Lawyers: From Professional Autonomy to Political Mobilization.” Law & Social Inquiry 41, no.2, Spring 2016: 331.Google Scholar

Godechot, J. Les Constitutions de la France depuis 1789. Paris: Flammarion, 1995.Google Scholar

Griffin, Stephen M. American constitutionalism: from theory to politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Grimm, D. “Das Risiko Demokratie.” In Guggenberger, Bernd, and Stein, Tine, Die Verfassungsdiskussion im Jahr der deutschen Einheit: Analysen, Hintergründe, Materialien. C. Hanser, 1991.Google Scholar

Grimm, D. Sovereignty. New York: Columbia University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Gueniffey, P. “Elections” In Furet, François, and Ozouf, Mona. A Critical Dictionary of the French Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Guha, R. India after Gandhi: The History of the World's Largest Democracy. Delhi: Pan, 2007.Google Scholar

Gunther, R. Spain After Franco. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Hajji, L. “The 18 October Coalition for Rights and Freedoms in Tunisia.” Arab Reform Initiative, February 2007.Google Scholar

Halmai, G. “Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments: Constitutional Courts as Guardians of the Constitution?” Constellations 19(2) (2012): 182–203.Google Scholar

Hamoudi, H. Negotiating in Civil Conflict: Constitutional Construction and Imperfect Bargaining in Iraq. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Harris, William F. The Interpretable Constitution. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Hart, H.L.A. The Concept of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1961.Google Scholar

Hauriou, Maurice. Précis de Droit Constitutionel. Paris: Sirey, 1923.Google Scholar

Hirschl, R. Towards Juristocracy: the Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas. The Elements of Law, Natural and Politic: Part I, Human Nature, Part II, De Corpore Politico; with Three Lives. Oxford University Press, USA, 1999.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas Leviathan, or the matter, form and power of a commonwealth, ecclesiastical and civil. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1907.Google Scholar

Hohmann, B. “Etappen des verfassungsrechtlichen Diskurses” In Guggenberger, Bernd, and Stein, Tine. Die Verfassungsdiskussion im Jahr der deutschen Einheit: Analysen, Hintergründe, Materialien. C. Hanser (1991): 98–99.Google Scholar

Horowitz, D.L. A Democratic South Africa? Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991.Google Scholar

International Crisis Group [ICG]. “Nepal's Royal Coup: Making a Bad Situation Worse,” ICG Asia Report 91. 9 February 2005.Google Scholar

International Crisis Group [ICG] “Nepal: Obstacles to Peace,” ICG Asia Report 57. 17 June 2003.Google Scholar

International Crisis Group [ICG] “Towards A Lasting Peace In Nepal: The Constitutional Issues,” Asia Report 99. 15 June 2005.Google Scholar

International Crisis Group [ICG] “Popular Protests in North Africa and the Middle East (IV): Tunisia's Way,” Report 106 April 2011.Google Scholar

International Crisis Group [ICG] “Marching in Circles: Egypt's Dangerous Second Transition,” Asia Report 35. August 2013.Google Scholar

Jacobsohn, G. “An Unconstitutional Constitution? A Comparative Perspective,” International Journal of Constitutional Law 4(3) (2006): 460–487.Google Scholar

Jacobsohn, G. Constitutional Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Jaffrelot, Christophe, ed. A History of Pakistan and its Origins. London: Anthem Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Jaume, L. “Constituent Power in France” Loughlin, M. and Walker, N. eds. Paradox of Constitutionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Jehlicka, P. et al. “Czechoslovak Parliamentary Elections 1990” in O'Loughlin, J. et al. eds. The New Political Geography of Eastern Europe. London: Belhaven Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Jellinek, G. Verfassungsänderung und Verfassungswandlun. Berlin: O. Häring, 1906.Google Scholar

Jellinek, G. Allgemeine Staatslehre. Berlin: Springer, 1920.Google Scholar

Jennings, Ivor. The Law and the Constitution. London: University of London Press, 1959.Google Scholar

Jennings, Ivor ed. Constitutional Laws of the Commonwealth. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1957.Google Scholar

Johnson, D. “Beyond Constituent Assemblies and Referenda: Assessing the Legitimacy of the Arab Spring Constitutions in Egypt and Tunisia,” Wake Forest L. Rev. 50, 2015: 1007–1032.Google Scholar

Jung, C. and Shapiro, I.. “South Africa's Negotiated Transition: Democracy, Opposition, and the New Constitutional Order,” Politics & Society 23.3 (1995): 269–308.Google Scholar

Kalyvas, Andreas. Democracy and the Politics of the Extraordinary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Kalyvas, Andreas “Popular Sovereignty, Democracy, and the Constituent Power,” Constellations 12(2) (2005): 223–244.Google Scholar

Kazin, Michael. The Populist Persuasion. An American History. New York: Basic Books, 1995.Google Scholar

Keay, J. India: A History. Revised and Updated. New York: Grove/Atlantic, 2011.Google Scholar

Kelly, Paul. Locke's Second Treatise on Government. New York: Continuum, 2007.Google Scholar

Kelsen, H. General Theory of Law and State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1945.Google Scholar

Khan, Y. The great partition: The making of India and Pakistan. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Khatib, L. “Political Participation and Democratic Transition in the Arab World,” U. Pa. J. Int'l L., 34 (2012):336–339.Google Scholar

Khokhosvar, F. New Arab Revolutions That Shook the World. London: Routledge, 2016.Google Scholar

Kis, János. “Between Reform and Revolution,” East European Politics and Societies 12, no. 2 (1998): 300–383.Google Scholar

Kis, János “A rendszerváltást lezáró alkotmány,” Népszabadság, August 19, 1994.Google Scholar

Klein, Claude. Théorie et pratique du pouvoir constituant. Paris: PUF 1996.Google Scholar

Kolarova, R. and Dimitrov, D. “The Roundtable Talks in Bulgaria.” In Elster, J. ed. The Roundtable Talks and the Breakdown of Communism (1996), pp. 178–212.Google Scholar

Koseki, Shoichi. The Birth of Japan's Post War Constitution. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Kotzé, Dirk. “The New South African Constitution.” In Faure, M. and Lane, J.-E., South Africa: Designing New Political Institutions. London: Sage, (1996), pp. 34–58.Google Scholar

Kouddous, Sharif Abdel. “What Happened to Egypt's Liberals After the Coup?,” The Nation, October 1, 2013.Google Scholar

Klug, H. Constituting Democracy: Law, Globalism and South Africa's Political Reconstruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

La Nauze, John. The Making of the Australian Constitution. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, 1972.Google Scholar

Lambert, É. Le gouvernement des juges [1921 ed.]. Paris: Dalloz, 2005.Google Scholar

Laclau, Ernesto On Populist Reason. New York: Verso, 2005.Google Scholar

Landau, David. “Constitution-Making Gone Wrong.” Alabama Law Review 923, 2013.Google Scholar

Landau, David., Feldman, N.., Sheppard, B., and Suazo, L.R., Report to the Commission on Truth and Reconciliation of Honduras: Constitutional Issues. FSU College of Law, Public Law Research Paper, 2011.Google Scholar

Landau, David, and Dixon, Rosalind. “Constraining Constitutional Change.” Wake Forest L. Rev. 50 (2015): 859.Google Scholar

Landsberg, Chris “Directing From the Stalls? The International Community and the South African Negotiating Forum” in Friedman, Steven, Moss, Glenn, Obery, Ingrid, and Atkinson, Doreen, eds. The small miracle: South Africa's negotiated settlement. Johannesburg: Ravan Press of South Africa, 1992.Google Scholar

Le Pillouer, Arnaud. Les pouvoirs non-constituants des assemblées constituants. Paris: Dalloz, 2005.Google Scholar

Lerner, H. Making Constitutions in Deeply Divided Societies, Cambridge CUP, 2011.Google Scholar

Lefort, Claude. Democracy and Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Lefort, Claude “The Permanence of the Theologico-political?,” Democracy and Political Theory (1988): 213–255.Google Scholar

Lenin, V.I. “Two Tactics of Social Democracy in the First Russian Revolution,” Selected Works 1 (1975): 425–527.Google Scholar

Levinson, Sanford, ed. Responding to Imperfection: the Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Levinson, Sanford Framed: America's 51 Constitutions and the Crisis of Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Levy, Leonard W. “Bill of Rights” in Levy, L.W. ed. Essays on the Making of the Constitution, New York: Oxford University Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Lindahl, H. “Constituent Power and Reflexive Identity: Towards an Ontology of Collective Selfhood” in Loughlin, Martin and Walker, Neil, Paradox of Constitutionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Linz, Juan and Stepan, Alfred. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Livius, Titus. Early History of Rome. London: Penguin, 1960.Google Scholar

Lijphart, A. Power-Sharing in South Africa. Berkeley: IIS, 1985.Google Scholar

Llorente, F. Rubio “The Writing of the Constitution of Spain” in Goldwin, R. and Kaufman, A. Constitution Makers on Constitution making. Washington: AEI, 1988.Google Scholar

Locke, John. Second Treatise of Government: An Essay Concerning the True Original, Extent and End of Civil Government. John Wiley & Sons, 2014.Google Scholar

Loewenstein, K. Volk und Parlament. [1922]. Munich: Scientia, 1967.Google Scholar

Loughlin, Martin and Walker, Neil, Paradox of Constitutionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Loveland, I. By Due Process of Law? Racial Discrimination and the Right to Vote in South Africa, 1855–1960. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1999.Google Scholar

Ludwikowski, R.R. Constitution-Making in the Region of Former Soviet Dominance. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Machiavelli, Niccolo. The Discourses. Penguin, 1970.Google Scholar

Macpherson, C.B. John Locke: Second Treatise of Government. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc. 1980.Google Scholar

Macumbe, J. “Electoral Processes and Procedures in Zimbabwe.” In O. Sichone The State and Constitutionalism. Harare: Sapes Books, 1998.Google Scholar

Madison, J. (Koch, A. ed.) Notes of Debates at the Federal Convention of 1787. New York: Norton, 1987.Google Scholar

Maier, Pauline. Ratification: The People Debate the Constitution 1787–1788. New York: Simon and Schuster, 2010.Google Scholar

Maier, Pauline Dissolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Mamdani, M. “Amnesty or impunity? A preliminary critique of the report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa (TRC).” Diacritics 32(3) (2005): 33–59.Google Scholar

Maraval, J.M. and Santamaria, J. “Political Change in Spain and the Prospects of Democracy” in O'Donnell, G. and Schmitter, P. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Marbury, W. “Limitations upon the Amending Power.” Harv. L. Rev. 33 (1919): 223.Google Scholar

Matynia, Eżbieta. “A demokrácia századvégi berendezkedáse, avagy a lengyel kerekaszta” in Bozóki, A., et al. eds A rendszerváltás forgatókönyve. Budapest: CEU Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Matynia, Eżbieta The Roundtable Talks of 1989. The Genesis of Hungarian Democracy. Budapest: CEU Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Matynia, Eżbieta Performative Democracy. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers, 2009.Google Scholar

Marks, Monica. “Women's Rights Before and After the Revolution” in Gana, Nouri, The Making of the Tunisian Revolution: Contexts, Architects, Prospects. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press (2013), pp. 224–251.Google Scholar

Marx, Karl. The Class Struggles in France 1848–1850. New York: New World Paperbacks, n.d.Google Scholar

Marx, Karl. The 18th Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. Wildside Press LLC, 2008.Google Scholar

Marx, Karl, and O'Malley, Joseph. Critique of Hegel's’ Philosophy of right. [1843]CUP Archive, 1977.Google Scholar

Marzouki, N. “From Resistance to Governance.” In Gana, Nouri. The Making of the Tunisian Revolution: Contexts, Architects, Prospects. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

McCloskey, Robert G., The American supreme court. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010.Google Scholar

McCormick, J. Machiavellian Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

McDonald, Forrest. We the People: the Economic Origins of the Constitution. New York: Transaction Publishers, 1991.Google Scholar

Mednicoff, David M. “A Tale of Three Constitutions: Common Drives and Diverse Outcomes in Post-2010 Arab Legal Politics,” Temp. Int'l & Comp. LJ 28 (2014): 215.Google Scholar

Merkl, Peter H. The Origin of the West German Republic. New York: Oxford University Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Merone, F. and Cavatorta, F. “The Rise of Salafism and the Future of Democratization” In Gana, Nouri. The Making of the Tunisian Revolution: Contexts, Architects, Prospects. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Meyer, R. “From Parliamentary Sovereignty to Constitutionality: the Democratization of South Africa 1990–1994” in Andrews, P. and Ellman, S. eds. Post Apartheid Constitutions. Athens: Ohio University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Michnik, A. Letters From Prison. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Miller, Laurel E., and Aucoin, Louis, eds. Framing the State in Times of Transition: Case Studies in Constitution Making. Washington: USIP, 2010.Google Scholar

Möllers, Christoph. “We Are (Afraid of) the People: Constituent Power in German Constitutionalism” in Loughlin, M. and Walker, N., The Paradox of Constitutionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Morris, Gouverneur. The Diary and Letters of Gouverneur Morris: Minister of the United States to France. Vol. 1. C. Scribner's Sons, 1888.Google Scholar

Moustafa, T. “Drafting Egypt's Constitution. Can a New Legal Framework Revive a Flawed Transition,” Brookings Doha Center Paper Series. March 2012.Google Scholar

Mtisi, Joseph, Nyakudya, Munyaradzi, and Barnes, Teresa. “War in Rhodesia, 1965–1980” in Raftopoulos, B. and Mlambo, A., Becoming Zimbabwe. Harare: Weaver Press, 2009, pp. 141–166.Google Scholar

Murray, Christina. “Negotiating Beyond Deadlock: from the Constitutional Assembly to the Court,” Int'l J. Legal Info. 32 (2004): 322.Google Scholar

Murswiek, D. Die verfassunggebende Gewalt nach dem Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1978.Google Scholar

Ndulo, M. “Zimbabwe's Unfulfilled Struggle for a Legitimate Constitutional Order” in Miller, Laurel E., and Aucoin, Louis, eds. Framing the State in Times of Transition: Case Studies in Constitution Making. Washington: USIP, 2010.Google Scholar

Negretto, G. Making Constitutions: Presidents, Parties, and Institutional Choice in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Nelson, Brian A. The Silence and the Scorpion: The Coup Against Chávez and the Making of Modern Venezuela. Nation Books, 2009.Google Scholar

Neuman, L. and McCoy, J. “Observing Political Change in Venezuela: The Bolivarian Constitution and 2000 Elections.” Carter Center Paper Series, 2001.Google Scholar

Omri, M. “No Ordinary Union: UGTT and the Tunisian Path to Revolution and Transition,” Workers of the World: International Journal on Strikes and Social Conflict, 1(7) (2015): 14–29.Google Scholar

Osiatinsky, W. “Poland's Constitutional Ordeal,” E. Eur. Const. Rev., 3(29), 1994.Google Scholar

Ost, D. Solidarity. Philadelphia: Temple, 1990.Google Scholar

Ottaway, M. “Democratic Transitions and the Problem of Power” Wilson Center Occasional Papers. Spring 2014.Google Scholar

Özbudun, Ergun, and Gençkaya, Ömer Faruk. Democratization and the Politics of Constitution- making in Turkey. Budapest: CEU Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Ozouf, M. “Federalism.” In Furet, François, and Ozouf, Mona. A Critical Dictionary of the French Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Palmer, R.R. The Age of the Democratic Revolution I. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1959.Google Scholar

Palmer, R. R The Age of the Democratic Revolutions II. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1964.Google Scholar

Partlett, William. “Separation of Powers without Checks and Balances: The Failure of Semi-Presidentialism and the Making of the Russian Constitutional System, 1991–1993,” The Legal Dimension in Cold War Interactions: Some Notes from the Field. Law in Eastern Europe Series. Leiden: Brill, 2012.Google Scholar

Pasquino, Pasquale. Sieyès et l'invention de la constitution en France. Paris, Éditions Odile Jacob, 1998.Google Scholar

Peeva, R. “A bolgár kerekasztal tárgyalások összehasolitó szempontból” in Bozóki, A. et al. eds A rendszerváltás forgatókönyve. Budapest: CEU Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Perkins, K. “Playing the Islamic Card: The Use and Abuse of Religion in Tunisian Politics.” In Gana, Nouri. The Making of the Tunisian Revolution: Contexts, Architects, Prospects. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Pickard, Duncan. Lessons from Constitution-aking in Tunisia. New York: Atlantic Council of the United States, 2012.Google Scholar

Preuss, Ulrich. “The Round Table Talks in the GDR” in Elster, Jon, ed. The Roundtable Talks and the Breakdown of Communism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Przeworski, A. Democracy and Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Quint, Peter E. “The Constitutional Law of German Unification.” Md. L. Rev. 50 (1991): 475.Google Scholar

Ramaphosa, Cyril. “Negotiating a new nation: reflections on the development of South Africa's Constitution.” The Post-Apartheid Constitutions: Perspectives on South Africa's Basic Law. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Revkin, M. “Egypt's Constitution in Question.” Middle East Law and Governance, 5(3) (2013): 343.Google Scholar

Richet, D. “Revolutionary Assemblies” In Furet, François, and Ozouf, Mona. A Critical Dictionary of the French Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Rickard, Carmel. “The Certification of the Constitution of South Africa” in Andrews, Penelope, and Ellmann, Stephen, eds. The Post-apartheid Constitutions: Perspectives on South Africa's Basic Law. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press Publications, 2001.Google Scholar

Robertson, Claire “Contesting the Contest. Negotiating the Election Machinery” in Friedman, S. and Atkinson, D. eds. The Small Miracle. Johannesburg: Ravan, 1994.Google Scholar

Roellecke, G. “Dritter Weg zum Zweiten Fall.” in Guggenberger, Bernd, and Stein, Tine. Die Verfassungsdiskussion im Jahr der deutschen Einheit: Analysen, Hintergründe, Materialien. C. Hanser, 1991.Google Scholar

Rosanvallon, P. Le Peuple Introuvable. Paris: Gallimard, 2002.Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. [Considerations on] The Government of Poland [1771–1772]. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1985.Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques Natural Law and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1942.Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques The Social Contract: & Discourses. No. 660. J.M. Dent & Sons, 1920.Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques Letter to Beaumont, Letters Written from the Mountain, and Related Writings, vol. 9. UPNE, 2013.Google Scholar

, Roznai Y. “Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments – The Migration and Success of a Constitutional Idea.” American Journal of Comparative Law, 61(3) (2013): 657–719.Google Scholar

Roznai, Y. and Yolcu, S. (2012) “An Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendment – The Turkish Perspective: A Comment on the Turkish Constitutional Court's Headscarf Decision,” International Journal of Constitutional Law, 10(1): 175–207.Google Scholar

Russell, P. Constitutional Odyssey, 3rd ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Sachs, Albie. The Politics of Accommodation: Constitution-making in South Africa: A Lecture. National Democratic Institute for International Affairs, 1998.Google Scholar

Said, Edward. From Oslo to Iraq and the Road Map: Essays. New York: Vintage, 2004.Google Scholar

Sarakinsky, Ivor. “Rehearsing joint rule: The Transitional Executive Council.” Friedman, S., Atkinson, D.,(Eds), South African Review 7 (1994).Google Scholar

Sarotte, M.E. 1989. The Struggle to Create a Post-War Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Scheppele, K. “Unconstitutional Constituent Power” in Smith, R. and Beeman, R. (eds.), Constitution Making. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Scheppele, K “Constitutional Negotiations. Political Contexts of Judicial Activism in Post-Soviet Europe” in Arjomand, S.A. (ed.), Constitutionalism and Political Reconstruction. Leiden: Brill 2007.Google Scholar

Schiemann, J. The Politics of Pact-making: Hungary's Negotiated Transition to Democracy in Comparative Perspective. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.Google Scholar

Schlink, Bernhardt. “Deutsch-deutsche Verfassungentwicklungen im Jahre 1990.” In Guggenberger, Bernd, and Stein, Tine. Die Verfassungsdiskussion im Jahr der deutschen Einheit: Analysen, Hintergründe, Materialien. C. Hanser, 1991.Google Scholar

Carl, Schmitt. Verfassungslehre. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1928.Google Scholar

Carl, Schmitt The Leviathan in the State Theory of Thomas Hobbes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Carl, Schmitt Political Theology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Carl, Schmitt Die Diktatur. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1928.Google Scholar

Segura, Renata, and María Bejarano, Ana. “¡Ni una asamblea más sin nosotros! Exclusion, Inclusion, and the Politics of Constitution-Making in the Andes,” Constellations 11(2) (2004): 217–236.Google Scholar

Segura, Renata, and María Bejarano, Ana and María Bejarano, Ana “Deepening Democracy via Constitutional Change.” Contrasting Colombia and Venezuela. Ponencia presentada en el taller LASA-Mellon Foundation.” The gap from parchment to practice: Ambivalent effects of constitutions in democratizing countries. Washington, May (2013): 28–29.Google Scholar

Shambayati, H. “The Guardian of the Regime: The Turkish Constitutional Court in Comparative Perspective” in Arjomand, Said Amir, ed. Constitutional Politics in the Middle East: With Special Reference to Turkey, Iraq, Iran and Afghanistan. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, (2008), pp. 99–122.Google Scholar

Sieyès, E.J. Écrits politiques. Basle, Switzerland: Gordon & Breach, 1994.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. The Foundations of Modern Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin Hobbes and Republican Liberty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Skocpol, Theda. States and Modern Revolutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Skowronek, S. Building a New American State. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Smolenski, Jan. “Semi Federalism: The Principles and Implications of the Making of the 1780 Constitution in Massachusetts,” The New School for Social Research, unpublished seminar paper, 2015.Google Scholar

Sohrabi, Nader. Revolutions and Constitutionalism in the Ottoman Empire and Iran. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Sólyom, L. “The Role of Constitutional Courts in the Transition to Democracy With Special Reference to Hungary” in Arjomand, Said Amir, ed. Constitutional Politics in the Middle East: With Special Reference to Turkey, Iraq, Iran and Afghanistan. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2008.Google Scholar

Sólyom, L “A jogállami forradalomtól az EU csatakozásig. Az alkotmányfejlődés keretei” in Majtényi, L. and Miklósi, Z. (eds.), És mi lesz az alkotmánnyal. Budapest: Eötvös Károly Intézet, 2004, pp. 15–16.Google Scholar

Snellinger, Amanda. “The Production of Possibility Through an Impossible Ideal Consensus as a Political Value in Nepal's Constituent Assembly,” Constellations 22(2) (June) 2015: 233–245.Google Scholar

Stein, E. Czecho/Slovakia. Ethnic Conflict, Constitutional Fissure, Negotiated Breakup. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Stepan, A. “Tunisia's Transition and the Twin Tolerations,” Journal of Democracy, 23(2), 89–103, 2012.Google Scholar

Suber, P. The Paradox of Self-Amendment. New York: Peter Lang, 1990.Google Scholar

Taagepera, R. and Shugart, M.. Seats and Votes. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Tadros, M. The Muslim Brotherhood in Contemporary Egypt: Democracy Redefined or Confined? London: Routledge, 2012.Google Scholar

Tadros, M. “The Muslim Brotherhood's Gender Agenda: Reformed or Reframed?,” IDS Bulletin, 42(1) (2011): 88–98.Google Scholar

Tagapeera, and Shugart, . Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Tavana, Daniel L. “Party Proliferation and Electoral Transition in post-Mubarak Egypt,” The Journal of North African Studies 16(4) (2011): 555–571.Google Scholar

Teitel, R. Transitional Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Templin, W. “Die Diskussion über the Verfassungsentwurf des Runden Tisches” In Guggenberger, Bernd, and Stein, Tine. Die Verfassungsdiskussion im Jahr der deutschen Einheit: Analysen, Hintergründe,Materialien. C. Hanser, 1991.Google Scholar

Thompson, L.M. The Unification of South Africa. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1960.Google Scholar

Tilly, Charles. From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading, MA: Addison and Wesley, 1978.Google Scholar

Touraine, A. et al. Solidarity: the Analysis of a Social Movement: Poland, 1980–1981. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Trotsky, Leon. The Russian Revolution, trans. by Eastman, M.. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1936.Google Scholar

Trotsky, Leon Terrorism and Communism. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1961.Google Scholar

Tugal, C. The Fall of the Turkish Model. London: Verso, 2016.Google Scholar

Van Tonder, J.J. “The Salient Features of the Interim Constitution” in Faure, M. and Lane, J.-E., eds, South Africa. Designing New Political Institutions. London: Sage, 1996.Google Scholar

Van Zyl, Paul. “Dilemmas of Transitional Justice: the Case of South Africa's Truth and Reconciliation Commission,” Journal of International Affairs, 52(2), Spring 1999.Google Scholar

Varol, O. “The Military as the Guardian of Constitutional Democracy,” Colum. J. Transnat'l L. 51 (2012): 547.Google Scholar

Vásárhelyi, M. “A tárgyalások nyilvánossága, a nyilvánosság tárgyalása” in Bozóki, A et al. eds “A rendszerváltás forgatókönyve v. VII.” In Vile, M.J. C., Constitutionalism and the Separation of Powers. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1998.Google Scholar

Von Gierke, Otto Friedrich. Natural Law and the Theory of Society: 1500 to 1800. Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1957.Google Scholar

Wagner-Pacifici, Robin. What is an Event? Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Waldron, J. The Dignity of Legislation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Weber, Max. Economy and Society I. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Wheare, K.C. Federal Government. London: Oxford University Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Wheare, K.C Constitutional Structure of the Commonwealth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1960.Google Scholar

Whelpton, John. A History of Nepal. Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Wiechers, Marinus. “Namibia's Long Walk to Freedom: the Role of Constitution Making in the Creation of an Independent Namibia” in Miller, Laurel E. and Aucoin, Louis, eds., Framing the State in Times of Transition: Case Studies in Constitution Making. Washington, DC: USIP, 2010), pp. 81–110.Google Scholar

Williams, Damian. “Nepali Constitution-Making After the Revolution,” Constellations 22(2) (2015): 246–254.Google Scholar

Wood, Gordon S. The Creation of the American Republic, 1776–1787. UNC Press Books, 2011.Google Scholar

Zeghal, Malika. “Competing Ways of Life: Islamism, Secularism, and Public Order in the Tunisian Transition,” Constellations 20(2) (2013): 254–274.Google Scholar

Zemni, Sami. “The Extraordinary Politics of the Tunisian Revolution: the Process of Constitution Making,” Mediterranean Politics 20(1) (2015): 1–17.Google Scholar

Zemni, Sami “From Socio-economic Protest to National Revolt: the Labor Origins of the Tunisian Revolution” in Gana, Nouri, The Making of the Tunisian Revolution: Contexts, Architects, Prospects. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Zweig, E. Die Lehre von Pouvoir Constituant. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1909.Google Scholar