Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T10:21:36.141Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Use of conditional cash transfers for addressing gender-based inequalities in health and education among children: studying the impact of the Shubh Laxmi scheme in Rajasthan, India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2020

RAJNISH RANJAN PRASAD Open the ORCID record for RAJNISH RANJAN PRASAD [Opens in a new window]  and
DIVYA SANTHANAM
RAJNISH RANJAN PRASAD*
Affiliation:
IIHMR University, Jaipur, India
DIVYA SANTHANAM
Affiliation:
Independent Researcher
*
*Correspondence to: IIHMR – Public Health, Prabhu Dayal Marg, Jaipur 302011, India. E-mail: rajnishranjanprasad@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the last few decades, conditional cash transfer (CCT) programmes have become very popular for addressing different development challenges. The use of CCT programmes to promote enrolment in schools, improve preventive health care and increase household consumption in Latin America has been well documented. However, the potential of CCT programmes to change more deep-rooted norms is not very clear. The Shubh Laxmi scheme, a CCT programme, was started by the Government of Rajasthan, India, to improve the status of health and education among girls. A study was undertaken to understand the changes in beneficiaries’ perspectives due to scheme. A total of 95 beneficiaries were randomly selected and in-depth interviews were conducted in order to understand the impact of the scheme. In addition, two focus group discussions were conducted with 30 non-beneficiaries in order to understand their awareness about the scheme and their perceptions of girls. The findings show that the CCT programme has helped in generating a positive attitude among beneficiaries towards the survival, education and well-being of girls. The key challenge was low awareness of the scheme and of the procedures for claiming its benefits. This study highlights that CCT programmes are useful for nudging people to address gender-based inequalities in health and education among children; however, effective implementation remains key.

Type
New Voices
Information
Behavioural Public Policy , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , April 2023 , pp. 488 - 499
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almas, I., Armand, A., Attanasio, O. and Carneiro, P. (2015), Measuring and Changing Control: Women's Empowerment and Targeted Transfers. CEPR Discussion Papers 10973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armand, A. Attanasio, O. Carneiro, P. and Lechene, V. (2016), The Effect of Gender-Targeted Conditional Cash Transfers on Household Expenditures: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment. Institute for the Study of Labor.Google Scholar
Asadullah, M.N. and Chaudhury, N. (2009), ‘Reverse gender gap in schooling in Bangladesh: insights from urban and rural households’, Journal of Development Studies, 45(8): 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benhassine, N. et al. (2015), ‘Turning a Shove into a Nudge? A “Labeled Cash Transfer” for Education’, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 7(3): 86–125.Google Scholar
Cassar, A., and Katz, E. (2016), Gender, Behavior, and Women's Economic Empowerment. CGD Background Paper. Center for Global Development.Google Scholar
Coady, D., Grosh, M. and Hoddinott, J. (2004), Targeting of Transfers in Developing Countries: Review of Lessons and Experience. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filmer, D. and Schady, N. (2008), ‘Getting Girls into School: Evidence from a Scholarship Program in Cambodia’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 56(3): 581–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Government of Rajasthan. (2013), Shubh Laxmi Yojana.Google Scholar
Hanlon, J. (2004), ‘It is possible just to give money to the poor’, Development and Change, 35 (2): 375–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornacki, B. (2005), ‘Conditional Cash Transfers: Progress Towards the Millennium Development Goals’, Sustainable Development Law & Policy. American University Washington College of Law. 6(1), 26.Google Scholar
Lagarde, M., Haines, A. and Palmer, N. (2009), The impact of conditional cash transfers on health outcomes and use of health services in low and middle income countries. Cochrane Systematic Review.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lim, S. et al. (2010), ‘India's Janani Suraksha Yojana, a conditional cash transfer programme to increase births in health facilities: an impact evaluation’, The Lancet, 375(9730): 2009–2023.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindert, K., Linder, A., Hobbs, J. and Brière, B. (2007), The Nuts and Bolts of Brazil's Bolsa Família Program: Implementing Conditional Cash Transfers in a Decentralized Context. The World Bank, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Molyneux, M. (2008), ‘The ‘Neoliberal Turn’ and the New Social Policy in Latin America: How Neoliberal, How New?’, Development and Change, 39(5): 775–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murthi, M., Guio, A.C. and Dreze, J. (1995), ‘Mortality, fertility and gender bias in India: a district-level analysis’, Population Development Review, 21(4):745–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner. (2013), Census 2011 – Detailed Tables. Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Rawlings, L.B. and Rubio, G.M. (2005), ‘Evaluating the Impact of Conditional Cash Transfer Programs’, The World Bank Research Observer, 20(1): 29–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, T. (2004), ‘School subsidies for the poor: evaluating the Mexican Progresa poverty program’, Journal of Development Economics, 74 (1): 199–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sekher, T.V. (2010), Special financial incentive schemes for the girl Child in India: a review of select schemes. The Planning Commission. Government of India, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Sekher, T.V. (2012), ‘Ladlis and Lakshmis: financial incentive schemes for the girl child’, Economic & Political Weekly, 58(17): 58–65.Google Scholar
Sinha, N. and Yoong, J. (2009), Long-Term Financial Incentives and Investment in Daughters Evidence from Conditional Cash Transfers in North India. Policy Research Working Paper 4860. The World Bank, Washington DC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soares, F.V. and Silva, E. (2010), Conditional cash transfer programmes and gender vulnerabilities in Latin America Case studies from Brazil, Chile and Colombia. Overseas Development Institute, London.Google Scholar
Soares, R. (2007), ‘On the Determinants of Mortality Reductions in the Developing World’, Population and Development Review, 33(2): 246–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Son, H.H. (2008), Conditional Cash Transfer Programs: An Effective Tool for Poverty Alleviation?. ERD policy brief no. 51. Asian Development Bank, Manila.Google Scholar
UNFPA. (2015), How many girls are missing at birth in India? Trends in Sex Ratio at Birth (2001–12).Google Scholar
World Bank. (2015), World Development Report – Mind, Society and Behaviour.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, J. and Moury, Y. (2009), Savings-Linked Conditional Cash Transfers - A New Policy Approach to Global Poverty Reduction. New America Foundation, Washington DC.Google Scholar