Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T22:04:14.511Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The International Centre for Settlement of Investment Dipsutes: Daimler Financial Services AG v. Argentine Republic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Karen Halverson Cross
Karen Halverson Cross*
Affiliation:
John Marshall Law School, Chicago, IL
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
International Legal Documents
Information
International Legal Materials , Volume 51 , Issue 6 , December 2012 , pp. 1223 - 1321
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Endnotes

1 Daimler Financial Services AG v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/1, Award (Aug. 22, 2012), available at http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ital082.pdf [hereinafter Daimler].

2 Treaty on the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investments, Ger.-Arg., arts. 3, 4(4), Apr. 9, 1991, 1910 U.N.T.S. 198 [hereinafter Germany-Argentina BIT].

3 These members were the two party-appointed arbitrators, Judge Charles N. Brower and Professor Domingo Bello Janeiro.

4 See Siemens A.G. v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/8, Decision on Jurisdiction, ¶¶ 102-03 (Aug. 3, 2004).

5 See Daimler, supra note 1, ¶ 36.

6 Id. ¶ 38.

7 Id. ¶ 39.

8 Id. ¶¶ 41-42.

9 Id. ¶ 44.

10 Id. ¶¶ 42, 44.

11 Id. ¶ 158 (referring to Germany-Argentina BIT, supra note 2, art. 10).

12 Id. ¶ 175.

13 Id. ¶ 191.

14 Id. ¶¶ 193-94.

15 Id. ¶ 220.

16 Id. ¶ 221.

17 Id. ¶ 228.

18 Id. ¶ 230.

19 ICS Inspection & Control Services Ltd. (United Kingdom) v. Argentine Republic, PCA Case No. 2010-9, Award on Jurisdiction (Feb. 10, 2012), available at http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0416.pdf.

20 Daimler Financial Services AG v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/1, Dissenting Opinion of Judge Charles N. Brower (Aug. 15, 2012), available at http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ital083.pdf [hereinafter Brower Dissent].

21 Id. ¶¶ 3-11.

22 Id. ¶ 13.

23 Id. ¶ 34.

24 Id. ¶ 38.

25 Daimler Financial Services AG v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/1, Opinion of Professor Domingo Bello Janeiro (Aug. 16, 2012), available at http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita1084.pdf.

26 See Maupin, Julie A., MFN-Based Jurisdiction in Investor-State Arbitration: Is There Any Hope for a Consistent Approach?, 14 J. Int’l Econ. L. 157 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

27 Cf. Daimler, supra note 1, ¶ 268, with Brower Dissent, supra note 20, ¶¶ 23-26.

28 Daimler, supra note 1, ¶ 113.

29 Id. ¶¶ 144-46.

30 Id. ¶¶ 151-53.

31 Abaclat & Others v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/5, Decision on Jurisdiction and Admissibility (Aug. 4, 2011), available at http://italaw.com/documents/Abaclat-DecisiononJurisdiction.pdf.

32 Daimler, supra note 1, ¶ 160.