Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T07:23:41.501Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Premises of multi-competence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2016

Vivian Cook
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Li Wei
Affiliation:
Institute of Education, University College London
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrahamsson, N. and Hyltenstam, K. 2009. ‘Age of onset and nativelikeness in a second language: listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny’, Language Learning 59, 249306.Google Scholar
An Phríomh-Oifig Staidrimh/Central Statistics Office 2012. This is Ireland: Highlights from Census 2011. Dublin: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Anderson, B. 1983. Imagined Communities. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
APA Guidelines 2010. Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, sixth edition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Aronin, L. 2006. ‘Dominant language constellations: an approach to multilingualism studies’, in Ó Laoire, M. (ed.), Multilingualism in Educational Settings, pp. 140159. Hohengehren: Schneider Publications.Google Scholar
Baker, P. and Eversley, J. 2000. Multilingual Capital. London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar
Bassetti, B. and Cook, V. J. 2011. ‘Relating language and cognition: the second language user’, in Cook, V. J. and Bassetti, B. (eds), pp. 143190.Google Scholar
Bernstein, B. 1971. Class, Codes and Control, vol. 1. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E. 1991. ‘Metalinguistic dimensions of bilingual language proficiency’, in Bialystok, E. (ed.), Language Processing in Bilingual Children, pp. 113140. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E. 2009. ‘The Good, the Bad and the Indifferent’, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 12 (1), 311.Google Scholar
Birdsong, D. 2005. ‘Nativelikeness and non-nativelikeness in L2A research’, IRAL 43, 319328.Google Scholar
Bley-Vroman, R. 1983. ‘The comparative fallacy in interlanguage studies: the case of systematicity’, Language Learning 33, 117.Google Scholar
Block, D. 2007. Second Language Identities. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, L. 1933. Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Boas, F. 1920/1940. ‘The methods of ethnology’, American Anthropologist 22, 311322. Reprinted in Boas, F. 1940, Race, Language and Culture, pp. 281289. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Brown, A. 2013. ‘Multi-competence and second language assessment’, Language Assessment Quarterly 10 (2), 219235.Google Scholar
Brutt-Griffler, J. 2002. World English: A Study of its Development. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Cabrelli Amaro, J., Flynn, S. and Rothman, J. (eds) 2012. ‘Introduction’, in Cabrelli Amaro, J., Flynn, S. and Rothman, J. (eds), Third Language Acquisition in Adulthood, pp. 16. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Canagarajah, S. 2007. ‘Lingua Franca English, multilingual communities and language acquisition’, Modern Language Journal 91, 923939.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1991. ‘Linguistics and cognitive science: problems and mysteries’, in Kasher, A. (ed.), The Chomskyan Turn, pp. 2653. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 2013. ‘Problems of projection’, Lingua 18, 135.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. and Lasnik, H. 1993. ‘Principles and parameters theory’, in Jacobs, J., von Stechow, A., Sternefeld, W. and Vennemann, T. (eds), Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, pp. 506569. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Clyne, M. 1997. ‘Multilingualism’, in Coulmas, F. (ed.), The Handbook of Sociolinguistics, pp. 301314. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cook, V. J. 1991. ‘The poverty-of-the-stimulus argument and multi-competence’, Second Language Research 7 (2), 103117.Google Scholar
Cook, V. J. 1997. ‘Monolingual bias in second language acquisition research’, Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 34, 3550.Google Scholar
Cook, V. J. 2002a. ‘Background to the L2 user’, in Cook, V. J. (ed.), Portraits of the L2 User, pp. 128. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Cook, V. J. 2002b. Bilingual cognition. Opening talk at a colloquium at EUROSLA Basel. http://homepage.ntlworld.com/vivian.c/Writings/Papers/BilCogEUROSLA2002.htmGoogle Scholar
Cook, V. J. (ed.) 2003. Effects of the L2 on the L1. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Cook, V. J. 2007. ‘The goals of ELT: reproducing native-speakers or promoting multi-competence among second language users?’ in Cummins, J. and Davison, C. (eds), International Handbook of English Language Teaching, pp. 237248. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Cook, V. J. 2009a. ‘Multilingual Universal Grammar as the norm’, in Leung, I. (ed.), Third Language Acquisition and Universal Grammar, pp. 5570. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Cook, V. J. 2009b. ‘Language user groups and language teaching’, in Cook, V. J. and Wei, Li (eds), Contemporary Applied Linguistics, vol. 1: Language Teaching and Learning, pp. 5474. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Cook, V. J. 2010. ‘Prolegomena to second language learning’, in Seedhouse, P., Walsh, S. and Jenks, C. (eds), Conceptualising ‘Learning’ in Applied Linguistics, pp. 622. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Cook, V. J. 2012. ‘Multi-competence’, in Chapelle, C. A. (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, pp. 37683774. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cook, V. J. 2013. ‘The language of the street’, Applied Linguistics Review 4 (1), 4381.Google Scholar
Cook, V. J. 2015. ‘Discussing the language and thought of motion in second language speakers’, Modern Language Journal 99 (supplement), 154164.Google Scholar
Cook, V. J., to appear. ‘The relationship between the languages of multi-competence’, in Alonzo, R. (ed.), Cross-linguistic Influence. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Cook, V. J. and Bassetti, B. (eds) 2011. Language and Bilingual Cognition. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Craik, F. and Lockhart, R. 1972. ‘Levels of processing: a framework for memory research’, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 11, 671684.Google Scholar
De Angelis, G. 2007. Third or Additional Language Acquisition. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
De Saussure, F. 1916/1976. Cours de Linguistique Générale. Bally, C. and Sechehaye, A. (eds) 1916. Critical edition by de Maurio, T.. Paris: Payothèque, Payot.Google Scholar
De Swaan, A. 2002. Words of the World: The Global Language System. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Doughty, C. and Long, M. 2003. Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Enfield, N. 2010. ‘Without social context?Science 329, 16001601.Google Scholar
Franceschini, R. 2011. ‘Multilingualism and multi-competence: a conceptual view’, Modern Language Journal 95 (3), 344355.Google Scholar
Friesen, D. C. and Jared, D. 2011. ‘Cross-language phonological activation of meaning: evidence from category verification’, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 15 (1), 145156.Google Scholar
Green, D. W. 1998. ‘Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system’, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 1, 6781.Google Scholar
Grosjean, F. 1994. ‘Individual bilingualism’, in Asher, R. E. (ed.), The Encyclopaedia of Language and Linguistics, pp. 16561660. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Grosjean, F. 2008. Studying Bilinguals. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hammerberg, B. 2010. ‘The languages of the multilingual: some conceptual and terminological issues’, IRAL 48, 91104.Google Scholar
Han, A. Y. and Ginsburg, H. P. 2001. ‘Chinese and English mathematics language: the relation between linguistic clarity and mathematics performance’, Mathematical Thinking and Learning 3, 201220.Google Scholar
Han, Z.-H. and Cadierno, T. (eds) 2010. Linguistic Relativity in SLA: Thinking for Speaking. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Haugen, E. 1953. The Norwegian Language in America. University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Hermans, D., Ormel, E., van Besselaar, R. and van Hell, J. 2011. ‘Lexical activation in bilinguals’ speech production is dynamic: how language ambiguous words can affect cross-language activation’, Language and Cognitive Processes 26 (10), 16871709.Google Scholar
Hyltenstam, K. and Abrahamsson, N. 2003. ‘Maturational constraints in SLA’, in Doughty, C. and Long, M. (eds), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, pp. 539588. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Illich, I. and Sanders, B. 1988. ABC: Alphabetisation of the Popular Mind. Berkeley: North Point Press.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. 2002. Foundations of Language. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jarvis, S. and Pavlenko, A. 2009. Crosslinguistic Influence in Language and Cognition. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kasper, G. and Kellerman, E. (eds) 1997. Communication Strategies: Psycholinguistic and Sociolinguistic Perspectives. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Kato, K. 2004. Second Language (L2) Segmental Speech Learning: Perception and Production of L2 English by Japanese Native Speakers. PhD dissertation, University of Essex, UK.Google Scholar
Klein, W. 1986. Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Klima, E. and Bellugi, U. 1966. ‘Syntactic regularities in the speech of children’, in Lyons, J. and Wales, R. J. (eds), Psycholinguistics Papers, pp. 183208. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Kristeva, J. 2007. ‘The other language or the condition of being alive’. http://translation.hau.gr/telamon/files/Kristeva%27s%20speech.pdfGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, T. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W. 1969. ‘The logic of non-standard English’, Georgetown Monographs on Language and Linguistics 22, 131.Google Scholar
Lambert, W. 1990. ‘Persistent issues in bilingualism’, in Harley, B., Allen, P., Cummins, J. and Swain, M. (eds), The Development of Second Language Proficiency, pp. 201218. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levelt, W., Roelofs, A. and Meyer, A. 1999. ‘A theory of lexical access in speech production’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22, 175.Google Scholar
Lightbown, P. and Spada, N. 2006. How Languages are Learned. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Llurda, E. (ed.) 2005. Non-Native Teachers. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Mauranen, A. 2012. Exploring ELF. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McArthur, T. 1992. Oxford Companion to the English Language. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. 2008. Incomplete Acquisition in Bilingualism: Re-examining the Age Factor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Nicholson, S. 2005. Is Jazz Dead? (Or Has It Moved to a New Address). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Office for National Statistics 2012. 2011 Census. www.ons.gov.uk/ons/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L. 2009. Understanding Second Language Acquisition. London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
Papafragou, A., Hulbert, J. and Trueswell, J. 2008. ‘Does language guide event perception? Evidence from eye-movements’, Cognition 108, 155184.Google Scholar
Pavlenko, A. 2005. Emotions and Multilingualism. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pavlenko, A. (ed.) 2011. Thinking and Speaking in Two Languages. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Peal, E. and Lambert, W. 1962. ‘The relation of bilingualism to intelligence’, Psychological Monographs 76, 123.Google Scholar
Phillipson, R. 1992. Linguistic Imperialism. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Plato, , c. 363 BC. ‘The Statesman, 262a’, in Plato in Twelve Volumes, vol. 12, translated by Fowler, H. N., 1921. London: William Heinemann.Google Scholar
Popper, K. 1972. Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roeper, T. 1999. ‘Universal bilingualism’, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 2, 169186.Google Scholar
Romaine, S. 1994. Bilingualism, second edition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sapir, E. 1921. Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech. Reprinted (no date) by Harcourt Brace and Co, New York.Google Scholar
Schmid, M. S. 2011. Language Attrition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Selinker, L. 1972. ‘Interlanguage’, International Review of Applied Linguistics 10 (3), 209231.Google Scholar
Skutnabb-Kangas, T. 1981. Bilingualism or Not: The Education of Minorities. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. 1991. ‘Learning to think for speaking: native language, cognition and rhetorical style’, Pragmatics 1 (1), 725.Google Scholar
Spivey, M. and Marian, V. 1999. ‘Cross talk between native and second languages: partial activation of an irrelevant lexicon’, Psychological Science 10, 181184.Google Scholar
Spivey, M. and Marian, V. 2003. ‘Competing activation in bilingual language processing: within- and between-language competition’, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 6 (2), 97115.Google Scholar
Spolsky, B. 1989. Conditions for Second Language Learning. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stern, H. H. 1992. Issues and Options in Language Teaching. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Takahashi, K. 2013. Language Learning, Gender and Desire. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. 2007. ‘Lexical typologies’, in Shopen, T. (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol. III: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, pp. 66168. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. 2003. Constructing a Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
US Census Bureau 2010. ‘Language use in the United States: 2007’, American Community Survey Reports, ACS 12.Google Scholar
Wandruszka, M. 1971. Die Mehrsprachigkeit des Menschen. Munich: Piper.Google Scholar
Weinreich, U. 1953. Languages in Contact: Findings and Problems. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Whorf, B. 1940/1956. ‘Science and linguistics’, in Carroll, J. B. (ed.), Language, Thought and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf, pp. 207219. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. 2014. Imprisoned in English. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yildiz, Y. 2012. Beyond the Mother Tongue: The Postmonolingual Condition. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×