Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T14:18:53.765Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Ratification of CEDAW and the Liberalization of Abortion Laws

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 October 2018

Kate Hunt Open the ORCID record for Kate Hunt [Opens in a new window]  and
Mike Gruszczynski
Kate Hunt
Affiliation:
Indiana University
Mike Gruszczynski
Affiliation:
Indiana University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Do international treaties lead to cross-national increases in women's rights? In contrast to Asal, Brown, and Figueroa's (2008) suggestion that the Convention to Eliminate All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) is not an important factor in explaining the liberalization of abortion rights polices, this article argues that the treaty contributes to increases in abortion rights when the terms of ratification are disaggregated. Previous excursions into this question have only considered whether a state has ratified the treaty, which is problematic from both a methodological and theoretical standpoint given that many states ratified with conditions, while only six states did not ratify at all. Additionally, some states ratified the Optional Protocol and some have not. We demonstrate that the disaggregation of levels of treaty ratification is associated with increases in women's rights in a model replicating that of Asal, Brown, and Figueroa. Further, we extend our knowledge of the dynamics of treaty ratification through the use of structural equations to more fully model how political, cultural, and economic factors, as well as exogenous international pressures, interact to produce changes in women's rights around the world.

Keywords

TreatiesCEDAWwomen's rightsabortion
Type
Research Article
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 15 , Issue 4 , December 2019 , pp. 722 - 745
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abbott, Kenneth W., and Snidal, Duncan. 2000. “Hard and Soft Law in International Governance.” International Organization 54 (3): 421–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, Melinda, and Kang, Alice. 2007. “Regional Advocacy Networks and the Protocol on the Rights of Women in Africa.” Politics & Gender 3 (4): 451–74.Google Scholar
Asal, Victor, Brown, Mitchell, and Figueroa, Renee Gibson. 2008. “Structure, Empowerment and the Liberalization of Cross-National Abortion Rights.” Politics & Gender 4 (2): 265–84.Google Scholar
Berer, Marge. 2002. “Making Abortion a Woman's Right Worldwide.” Reproductive Health Matters 10 (19): 1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blofield, Merike. 2006. The Politics of Moral Sin: Abortion and Divorce in Spain, Chile, and Argentina. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Blofield, Merike. 2008. “Women's Choices in Comparative Perspective: Abortion Policies in Late-Developing Catholic Countries.” Comparative Politics 40 (4): 399–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, Elizabeth H., Kim, Minzee, and Longhofer, Wesley. 2015. “Abortion Liberalization in World Society, 1960–2009.” American Journal of Sociology 121 (3): 882–913.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brandt, Michele, and Kaplan, Jeffrey A.. 1995. “The Tension between Women's Rights and Religious Rights: Reservations to CEDAW by Egypt, Bangladesh and Tunisia.” Journal of Law and Religion 12 (1): 105–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardenas, Sonia. 2007. Conflict and Compliance: State Responses to International Human Rights Pressure. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, Wade. 2009. “Hard and Soft Commitments to Human Rights Treaties, 1966–2000.” Sociological Forum 24 (3): 563–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, Wade. 2013. “Government Respect for Gendered Rights: The Effect of the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women on Women's Rights Outcomes, 1981–2004.” International Studies Quarterly 57 (2): 233–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Committee on CEDAW. 2013. “Recommendation No. 30 on Women in Conflict Prevention, Conflict and Post-conflict Situations.” http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/CEDAW/GComments/CEDAW.C.CG.30.pdf (accessed August 28, 2018).Google Scholar
Committee on CEDAW. 2018. “Report of the Inquiry Concerning the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland under Article 8 of the Optional Protocol to the CEDAW.” http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/Treaties/CEDAW/Shared%20Documents/GBR/INT_CEDAW_ITB_GBR_8637_E.pdf (accessed August 28, 2018).Google Scholar
Cook, Rebecca J. 1993. “International Human Rights and Women's Reproductive Health.” Studies in Family Planning 24 (2): 73–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cook, Rebecca J., and Dickens, Bernard M.. 2003. “Human Rights Dynamics of Abortion Law Reform.” Human Rights Quarterly 25 (1): 1–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cook, Rebecca J., Dickens, Bernard M., and Bliss, Laura E.. 1999. “International Developments in Abortion Law from 1988 to 1998.” American Journal of Public Health 89 (4): 579–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Copelon, Rhonda, Zampas, Christina, Brusie, Elizabeth, and deVore, Jacqueline. 2005. “Human Rights Begin at Birth: International Law and the Claim of Fetal Rights.” Reproductive Health Matters 13 (26): 120–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dillon, Michele. 1996. “Cultural Differences in the Abortion Discourse of the Catholic Church: Evidence from Four Countries.” Sociology of Religion 57 (1): 25–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Englehart, Neil A., and Miller, Melissa K.. 2014. “The CEDAW Effect: International Law's Impact on Women's Rights.” Journal of Human Rights 13 (1): 22–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, John, Nie, Zhenghua, and Byrnes, Jarrett. 2017. sem: Structural Equation Models. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=sem (accessed August 29, 2018).Google Scholar
Frank, David John. 1999. “The Social Bases of Environmental Treaty Ratification, 1900–1990.” Sociological Inquiry 69 (4): 523–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuentes, María Luisa Sánchez, Paine, Jennifer, and Elliott-Buettner, Brook. 2008. “The Decriminalisation of Abortion in Mexico City: How Did Abortion Rights Become a Political Priority?” Gender and Development 16 (2): 345–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, Ryan, and Jinks, Derek. 2003. “Measuring the Effects of Human Rights Treaties.” European Journal of International Law 14 (1): 171–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Mark M., Kittilson, Miki Caul, and Sandholtz, Wayne. 2006. “Women and Globalization: A Study of 180 Countries, 1975–2000.” International Organization 60 (2): 293–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimes, David, Benson, Janie, Singh, Susheela, Romero, Mariana, Ganatra, Bela, Okonofua, Friday E., and Shah, Iqbal H.. 2006. “Unsafe Abortion: The Preventable Pandemic.” The Lancet 368: 1908–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M. 2012. “International Regimes for Human Rights.” Annual Review of Political Science 15: 265–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., and Ron, James. 2009. “Seeing Double: Human Rights Impact through Qualitative and Quantitative Eyes.” World Politics 61 (2): 360–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., and Tsutsui, Kiyoteru. 2007. “Justice Lost! The Failure of International Human Rights Law to Matter Where Needed Most.” Journal of Peace Research 44 (4): 407–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Margaux. 2010. “Using International Law to Promote Millennium Health Targets: A Role for the CEDAW Optional Protocol in Reducing Maternal Mortality.” Wisconsin International Law Journal 28 (1): 74–107.Google Scholar
Hathaway, Oona A. 2002. “Do Treaties Make a Difference? Human Rights Treaties and the Problem of Compliance.” Yale Law Journal 111: 1932–2042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R., and Voeten, Erik. 2014. “International Courts as Agents of Legal Change: Evidence from LGBT Rights in Europe.” International Organization 68 (1): 77–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henisz, Witold J. 2017. “The Political Constraint Index (POLCON) Dataset.” https://mgmt.wharton.upenn.edu/faculty/heniszpolcon/polcondataset/ (accessed August 27, 2018).Google Scholar
Heyns, Christof, and Viljoen, Frans. 2001. “The Impact of the United Nations Human Rights Treaties on the Domestic Level.” Human Rights Quarterly 23 (3): 483–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Daniel W. Jr. 2010. “Estimating the Effects of Human Rights Treaties on State Behavior.” Journal of Politics 72 (4): 1161–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillebrecht, Courtney. 2012a. “The Domestic Mechanisms of Compliance with International Human Rights Law: Case Studies from the Inter-American Human Rights System.” Human Rights Quarterly 34 (4): 959–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillebrecht, Courtney. 2012b. “Implementing International Human Rights Law at Home: Domestic Politics and the European Court of Human Rights.” Human Rights Review 13 (3): 279–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Htun, Mala. 2003. Sex and the State: Abortion, Divorce, and the Family under Latin American Dictatorships and Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keck, Margaret E., and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kline, Rex B. 2010. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 3rd ed.New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Landman, Todd. 2005. “The Political Science of Human Rights.” British Journal of Political Science 35 (3): 549–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levels, Mark, Sluiter, Roderick, and Need, Ariana. 2014. “A Review of Abortion Laws in Western-European Countries: A Cross-National Comparison of Legal Developments between 1960 and 2010.” Health Policy 118 (1): 95–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lupu, Yonotan. 2013a. “Best Evidence: The Role of Information in Domestic Judicial Enforcement of International Human Rights Agreements.” International Organization 67 (3): 469–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupu, Yonotan. 2013b. “The Informative Power of Treaty Commitment: Using the Spatial Model to Address Selection Efforts.” American Journal of Political Science 57 (4): 912–25.Google Scholar
Milewicz, Karolina M., and Elsig, Manfred. 2014. “The Hidden World of Multilateralism: Treaty Commitments of Newly Democratized States in Europe.” International Studies Quarterly 58 (2): 322–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumayer, Eric. 2005. “Do International Human Rights Treaties Improve Respect for Human Rights?” Journal of Conflict Resolution 49 (6): 925–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumayer, Eric. 2007. “Qualified Ratification: Explaining Reservations to International Human Rights Treaties.” Journal of Legal Studies 32 (2): 397–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ngwena, Charles G. 2013. “A Commentary on LC v Peru: The CEDAW Committee's First Decision on Abortion.” Journal of African Law 57 (2): 310–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riddle, Jennifer. 2002–2003. “Making CEDAW Universal: A Critique of CEDAW's Reservation Regime Under Article 28 and the Effectiveness of the Reporting Process.” George Washington International Law Review 34: 605–38.Google Scholar
Roseel, Yves. 2012. “Lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling.” Journal of Statistical Software 48 (2): 1–36.Google Scholar
Sandholtz, Kurt W. 2012. “Making Standards Stick: A Theory of Coupled vs. Decoupled Compliance.” Organization Studies 33 (5–6): 655–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shalev, Carmel. 2000. “Rights to Sexual and Reproductive Health: The ICPD and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women.” Health and Human Rights 4 (2): 38–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simmons, Beth A. 2009. Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, Beth A. 2010. “Treaty Compliance and Violation.” Annual Review of Political Science 13: 273–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, Kwong-Leung. 2000. “The Leadership Role of International Law in Enforcing Women's Rights: The Optional Protocol to the Women's Convention.” Gender & Development 8 (3): 65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Towns, Ann E. 2010. Women and States: Norms and Hierarchies in International Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations, and Inter-Parliamentary Union (UN/IPU). 2003. “The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women and Its Optional Protocol: Handbook for Parliamentarians.” http://www.ipu.org/PDF/publications/cedaw_en.pdf (accessed August 29, 2018).Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly. 2011. “Right of Everyone to the Enjoyment of the Highest Attainable Standard of Physical and Mental Health: Note of the Secretary-General.” August 3. https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N11/443/58/PDF/N1144358.pdf?OpenElement (accessed August 28, 2018).Google Scholar
von Stein, Jana. 2005. “Do Treaties Constrain or Screen? Selection Bias and Treaty Compliance.” American Political Science Review 99 (4): 611–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, Denise. 2010. Women's Rights in Democratizing States: Just Debate and Gender Justice in the Public Sphere. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolman, Andrew. 2010. “Abortion in Korea: A Human Rights Perspective on the Current Debate over Enforcement of the Laws Prohibiting Abortion.” Journal of International Business and Law 9 (1): 153–74.Google Scholar
Zampas, Christina, and Gher, Jaime M.. 2008. “Abortion as a Human Right—International and Regional Standards.” Human Rights Law Review 8 (2): 249–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar