Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T15:10:14.078Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Compensation or Social Investment? Revisiting the Link between Globalisation and Popular Demand for the Welfare State

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 September 2018

MARIUS R. BUSEMEYER Open the ORCID record for MARIUS R. BUSEMEYER [Opens in a new window]  and
JULIAN L. GARRITZMANN
MARIUS R. BUSEMEYER
Affiliation:
Department of Politics and Public Administration, University of Konstanz, Fach D 79, D-78457 Konstanz, Germany email: Marius.Busemeyer@uni-konstanz.de
JULIAN L. GARRITZMANN
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Zurich, Affolternstrasse 56, CH-8050 Zurich, Switzerland email: Julian.Garritzmann@uzh.ch
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The debate on effects of globalisation on welfare states is extensive. Often couched in terms of a battle between the compensation and the efficiency theses, the scholarly literature has provided contradictory arguments and findings. This article contributes to the scholarly debate by exploring in greater detail the micro-level foundations of compensation theory. More specifically, we distinguish between individual policy preferences for compensatory social policies (unemployment insurance) and human capital-focused social investment policies (education), and expect globalisation to mainly affect demand for educational investment. A multi-level analysis of International Social Survey Programme (ISSP) survey data provides empirical support for this hypothesis. This finding provides an important revision and extension of the classical analytical perspective of compensation theory, because it shows that citizens value the social investment function of the welfare state above and beyond simple compensation via social transfers. This might be particularly relevant in today's skill-centred knowledge economies.

Type
Article
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 48 , Issue 3 , July 2019 , pp. 427 - 448
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ansell, B. W. (2008), ‘University Challenges: Explaining Institutional Change in Higher Education’, World Politics, 60, 2, 189–230.Google Scholar
Ansell, B. W. (2010), From the Ballot to the Blackboard: The Redistributive Political Economy of Education, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Balcells Ventura, L. (2006), ‘Trade Openness and Preferences for Redistribution: A Cross-National Assessment of the Compensation Hypothesis’, Business and Politics, 8, 2, 1–50.Google Scholar
Benarroch, M. and Pandey, M. (2012), ‘The Relationship Between Trade Openness and Government Size: Does Disaggregating Government Expenditure Matter?’ Journal of Macroeconomics, 34, 1, 239–52.Google Scholar
Blinder, A. (2007), ‘How Many U.S. Jobs Might be Offshoreable’, CEPS Working Paper No. 142.Google Scholar
Boix, C. (1998), Political Parties, Growth, and Equality. Conservative and Social Democratic Strategies in the World Economy, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bonoli, G. (2013), The Origins of Active Social Policy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brady, D., Beckfield, J. and Seeleib-Kaiser, M. (2005), ‘Economic Globalization and the Welfare State in Affluent Democracies, 1975-2001’, American Sociological Review, 70, 6, 921–48.Google Scholar
Brady, D., Beckfield, J. and Zhao, W. (2007), ‘The Consequences of Economic Globalization for Affluent Democracies’, Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 1, 313–34.Google Scholar
Brooks, C. and Manza, J. (2006), ‘Social Policy Responsiveness in Developed Democracies’, American Sociological Review, 71, 3, 474–94.Google Scholar
Burgoon, B. (2001), ‘Globalization and Welfare Compensation: Disentangling the Ties that Bind’, International Organization, 55, 3, 509–51.Google Scholar
Busemeyer, M. R. (2009), ‘From Myth to Reality: Globalisation and Public Spending in OECD Countries Revisited’, European Journal of Political Research, 48, 4, 455–82.Google Scholar
Busemeyer, M. R. (2012), ‘Inequality and the Political Economy of Education: An Analysis of Individual Preferences in OECD Countries’, Journal of European Social Policy, 22, 3, 219–40.Google Scholar
Busemeyer, M. R., Goerres, A. and Weschle, S. (2009), ‘Attitudes Towards Redistributive Spending in an Era of Demographic Ageing: The Rival Pressures From Age and Income in 14 OECD Countries’, Journal of European Social Policy, 19, 3, 195–212.Google Scholar
Cameron, D. R. (1978), ‘The Expansion of the Public Economy: A Comparative Analysis’, American Political Science Review, 72, 4, 1243–61.Google Scholar
Castles, F. G. (2004), The Future of the Welfare State: Crisis Myths and Realities, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cerny, P. G. (1997), ‘Paradoxes of the Competition State: The Dynamics of Political Globalization’, Government and Opposition, 32, 2, 251–74.Google Scholar
Dreher, A., Gaston, N. and Martens, P. (2008), Measuring Globalisation – Gauging Its Consequences, New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Emmenegger, P., Marx, P. and Schraff, D. (2015), ‘Labour Market Disadvantage, Political Orientations and Voting: How Adverse Labour Market Experiences Translate into Electoral Behaviour’, Socio-Economic Review, 13, 2, 189–213.Google Scholar
Garrett, G. (1998), Partisan Politics in the Global Economy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Garrett, G. (2001), ‘Globalization and Government Spending around the World’, Studies in Comparative International Development, 35, 4, 3–29.Google Scholar
Garrett, G. and Mitchell, D. (2001), ‘Globalization, Government Spending and Taxation in the OECD’, European Journal of Political Research, 39, 2, 145–77.Google Scholar
Garritzmann, J. L. (2015), ‘Attitudes towards Student Support. How Positive Feedback-Effects Prevent Change in the Four Worlds of Student Finance’, Journal of European Social Policy, 25, 2, 139–158.Google Scholar
Garritzmann, J. L., Busemeyer, M. R. and Neimanns, E. (2018), ‘Public Demand for Social Investment: New Supporting Coalitions for Welfare State Reform in Western Europe?’, Journal of European Public Policy, 25, 6, 844–61.Google Scholar
Genschel, P. (2002), ‘Globalization, Tax Competition, and the Welfare State’, Politics & Society, 30, 2, 245–75.Google Scholar
Genschel, P. (2004), ‘Globalization and the Welfare State: A Retrospective’, Journal of European Public Policy, 11, 4, 613–36.Google Scholar
Hays, J. C., Ehrlich, S. D. and Peinhardt, C. (2005), ‘Government Spending and Public Support for Trade in the OECD: An Empirical Test of the Embedded Liberalism Thesis’, International Organization, 59, 473–94.Google Scholar
Hays, J. C. (2009), Globalization and the New Politics of Embedded Liberalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hemerijck, A. (2013), Changing Welfare States, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hicks, A. (1999), Social Democracy and Welfare Capitalism: A Century of Income Security Politics, New York: Carnell.Google Scholar
ISSP Research Group (2008), International Social Survey Programme: Role of Government IV- ISSP 2006. Cologne: GESIS Data Archive. ZA4700 Data file Version 1.0.0.Google Scholar
Iversen, T. (2001), ‘The Dynamics of Welfare State Expansion: Trade Openness, Deindustrialization and Partisan Politics’, in Pierson, P. (ed), The New Politics of the Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 45–79.Google Scholar
Iversen, T. and Cusack, T. R. (2000), ‘The Causes of Welfare State Expansion: Deindustrialization or Globalization?’, World Politics, 52, 3, 313–49.Google Scholar
Jahn, D. (2006), ‘Globalization as “Galton's Problem”: The Missing Link in the Analysis of Diffusion Patterns in Welfare State Development’, International Organization, 60, 2, 401–31.Google Scholar
Jensen, C. (2011), ‘Capitalist Systems, Deindustrialization, and the Politics of Public Education’, Comparative Political Studies, 44, 4, 412–35.Google Scholar
Jensen, C. (2014), The Right and the Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, P. J. (1985), Small States in World Markets: Industrial Policy in Europe, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kurzer, P. (1991), ‘Unemployment in Open Economies: The Impact of Trade, Finance, and European Integration’, Comparative Political Studies, 24, 1, 3–30.Google Scholar
Kwon, H. Y. and Pontusson, J. (2010), ‘Globalization, Labor Power and Partisan Politics Revisited’, Socio-Economic Review, 8, 2, 251–81.Google Scholar
Leibrecht, M., Klien, M. and Onaran, O. (2011), ‘Globalization, welfare regimes and social protection expenditures in Western and Eastern European countries’, Public Choice, 148, 569–94.Google Scholar
Mansfield, E. D. and Mutz, D. C. (2009), ‘Support for Free Trade: Self-Interest, Sociotropic Politics, and out-Group Anxiety’, International Organization, 63, 425–57.Google Scholar
Marshall, J. and Fisher, S. D. (2015), ‘Compensation or Constraint? How Different Dynamics of Economic Globalization Affect Government Spending and Electoral Turnout’, British Journal of Political Science, 45, 2, 353–389.Google Scholar
Mayda, A. M. and Rodrik, D. (2005), ‘Why Are Some People (and Countries) More Protectionist Than Others?’, European Economic Review, 49, 1393–430.Google Scholar
Meinhard, S. and Potrafke, N. (2012), ‘The Globalization-Welfare State Nexus Reconsidered’, Review of International Economics, 20, 2, 271–87.Google Scholar
Meltzer, A. H. and Richard, S. F. (1981), ‘A Rational Theory of the Size of Government’, Journal of Political Economy, 89, 5, 914–27.Google Scholar
Morel, N., Palier, B. and Palme, J. (2012), Towards a Social Investment Welfare State? Ideas, Policies, and Challenges, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Potrafke, N. (2009), ‘Did globalization restrict partisan politics? An empirical evaluation of social expenditures in a panel of OECD countries’, Public Choice, 140, 105–25.Google Scholar
Rehm, P. (2012), ‘Social Policy by Popular Demand’, World Politics, 63, 2, 271–99.Google Scholar
Rodrik, D. (1997), Has Globalization Gone Too Far? Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Rodrik, D. (1998), ‘Why Do More Open Economies Have Bigger Governments?’, Journal of Political Economy, 106, 5, 997–1032.Google Scholar
Rudra, N. and Haggard, S. (2005), ‘Globalization, Democracy, and Effective Welfare Spending in the Developing World’, Comparative Political Studies, 38, 9, 1015–1049.Google Scholar
Schaffer, L. and Spilker, G. (2016), ‘Adding Another Level: Individual Responses to Globalization and Government Welfare Policies’, Political Science Research and Methods, 4, 2, 399–426.Google Scholar
Scharpf, F. W. (1991), Crisis and Choice in European Social Democracy, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Scheve, K. and Slaughter, M. J. (2004), ‘Economic Insecurity and the Globalization of Production’, American Journal of Political Science, 48, 4, 662–74.Google Scholar
Solt, F. (2009), ‘Standardizing the World Income Inequality Database’, Social Science Quarterly, 90, 2, 231–42.Google Scholar
Soroka, S. N. and Wlezien, C. (2010), Degrees of Democracy: Politics, Public Opinion, and Policy, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Starke, P., Kaasch, A. and van Hooren, F. (2014), ‘Political Parties and Social Policy Responses to Global Economic Crises: Constrained Partisanship in Mature Welfare States’, Journal of Social Policy, 43, 2, 225–246.Google Scholar
Stasavage, D. (2005), ‘Democracy and Education Spending in Africa’, American Journal of Political Science, 49, 2, 343–358.Google Scholar
Svallfors, S. (1997), ‘Worlds of Welfare and Attitudes to Redistribution: A Comparison of Eight Western Nations’, European Sociological Review, 13, 3, 283–304.Google Scholar
Swank, D. (2002), Global Capital, Political Institutions, and Policy Change in Developed Welfare States, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P. (2002), ‘The Silver Age of the Welfare State: Perspectives on Resilience’, Journal of Social Policy, 31, 4, 597–621.Google Scholar
Van Kersbergen, K. and Hemerijck, A. (2012), ‘Two Decades of Change in Europe: The Emergence of the Social Investment State’, Journal of Social Policy, 41, 3, 475–492.Google Scholar
Van Oorschot, W. (2006), ‘Making the Difference in Europe: Deservingness Perceptions among Citizens of European Welfare States’, Journal of European Social Policy, 16, 1, 23–42.Google Scholar
Walter, S. (2010a), ‘Globalization and the Demand-Side of Politics: How globalisation shapes individual perceptions of labor market risk and policy preferences’, Paper presented at IPES Annual Conference, Harvard University, November 12-13, 2010.Google Scholar
Walter, S. (2010b), ‘Globalization and the Welfare State: Testing the Microfoundations of the Compensation Hypothesis’, International Studies Quarterly, 54, 2, 403–26.Google Scholar
Walter, S. (2017), ‘Globalization and the Demand-Side of Politics: How Globalisation Shapes Labor Market Risk Perceptions and Policy Preferences’, Political Science Research and Methods, 5, 1, 55–80.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Busemeyer and Garritzmann supplementary material

Busemeyer and Garritzmann supplementary material Online Appendix

Download Busemeyer and Garritzmann supplementary material(File)
File 228.3 KB