Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-w7rtg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-19T12:24:12.674Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Environmental Influences on the Selectivity of Diphenamid in Seeded Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Robert P. Rice Jr.  and
Alan R. Putnam
Robert P. Rice Jr.
Affiliation:
Pestic. Res. Center, Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824. This is a portion of the senior author's thesis for the Ph.D degree
Alan R. Putnam
Affiliation:
Pestic. Res. Center, Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824. This is a portion of the senior author's thesis for the Ph.D degree
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Several environmental and edaphic factors were monitored to determine their association with tolerance of seeded tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) to diphenamid (N,N-dimethyl-2,2-diphenylacetamide). Injury increased with increasing soil pH and reduced temperature within 7 days of seeding in both field and growth chamber tests. The application of soluble fertilizer and diphenamid at planting acted synergistically to increase tomato injury. Prior to emergence of the tomato seedlings, 14C-diphenamid uptake was slight but increased with higher temperatures, while growth was inhibited at both low and high temperatures. Uptake and metabolism of 14C-diphenamid by plants in the cotyledon stage was not greatly affected by temperature or pH; however, translocation from the root to the shoot was reduced under low temperatures and high pH. These differences in translocation paralleled reported differences between tolerant and susceptible species, and may account for the increased diphenamid injury to tomatoes grown under stress conditions.

Keywords

Uptaketranslocationmetabolismtolerance
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 28 , Issue 2 , March 1980 , pp. 176 - 180
Copyright
Copyright © 1980 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bingham, W. W. and Shaver, R. 1971. Uptake, translocation, and degradation of diphenamid in plants. Weed Sci. 19:636–643.Google Scholar
2. Deli, J. and Warren, G. F. 1970. Uptake, translocation, and herbicidal effect of diphenamid. Weed Sci. 18:692–696.Google Scholar
3. Deli, J. and Warren, G. F. 1971. Relative sensitivity of several plants to diphenamid. Weed Sci. 19:70–72.Google Scholar
4. Eshel, Y. and Katon, J. 1972. Effect of time of application of diphenamid on pepper, weeds, and disease. Weed Sci. 20.468–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Eshel, Y. and Palevetch, D. 1973. Selective action of diphenamid and napropamide in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) and weeds. Weed Res. 13:379–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Frank, R. and Waywell, C. G. 1970. Tomato tolerance to two preemergence herbicides. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 95:370–377.Google Scholar
7. Genter, W. A. 1969. Phytotoxicity of demethylated analogs of diphenamid. Weed Sci. 17:284–285.Google Scholar
8. Hoagland, D. R. and Arnon, D. I. 1950. The water culture method for growing plants without soil. California Agric. Exp. Stn. Circ. 347. 32 pp.Google Scholar
9. LeBaron, H. M. 1963. Potential use of diphenamid for weed control in horticultural crops of eastern Virginia. Proc. Northeast Weed Control Conf. 17:44–50.Google Scholar
10. Lynch, R. and Sweet, R. D. 1971. Effect of environment on the activity of diphenamid. Weed Sci. 19:332–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Nashed, R. B. and Ilnicki, R. D. 1968. The effect of diphenamid on the uptake and distribution of macronutrient elements in cabbage. Proc. Northeast Weed Control Conf. 22:500.Google Scholar
12. Noll, C. J. 1962. An evaluation of chemicals used for the weeding of tomatoes. Proc. Northeast Weed Control Conf. 16:144–146.Google Scholar
13. Schultz, D. P. and Tweedy, B.G. 1972. The effect of light and humidity on absorption and degradation of diphenamid in tomatoes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 20:10–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Schultz, D. P. and Tweedy, B. G. 1971. Uptake and metabolism of N,N-dimethyl-2,2-diphenylacetamide in resistant and susceptible plants. J. Agric. Food Chem. 19:36–40.Google Scholar
15. Taylorson, R. B. 1965. Delayed preemergence weed control in seeded tomatoes and peppers. Weeds 13:306–308.Google Scholar
16. Yaklich, R. W. and Scott, E. G. 1973. The intracellular localization of the herbicide diphenamid in corn root tip. Physiol. Plant 28:447–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar