Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T22:38:48.973Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Why care about ‘style’ in legal scholarship?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 September 2019

Péter Cserne*
Affiliation:
Associate Professor of Law, School of Law, Northumbria University
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: peter.cserne@northumbria.ac.uk

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Special Issue Introduction
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Daston, L and Otte, M (1991) Introduction. Science in Context 4, 223232.Google Scholar
Gorla, G (1968) Lo Stile delle sentenze, ricerca storico-comparativa e testi commentati. Roma: Società editrice del ‘Foro italiano’.Google Scholar
Goutal, JL (1976) Characteristics of judicial style in France, Britain and the U. S. A. American Journal of Comparative Law 24, 4372.Google Scholar
Kötz, H (1973) Über den Stil höchstrichterlicher Entscheidungen. Rabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht 37, 245263.Google Scholar
Lashöfer, J (1992) Zum Stilwandel in richterlichen Entscheidungen: Über stilistische Veränderungen in englischen, französischen und deutschen zivilrechtlichen Urteilen und in Entscheidungen des Gerichtshofs der Europäischen Gemeinschaften. Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
Lawson, FH (1977) Comparative judicial style. American Journal of Comparative Law 25, 364371.Google Scholar
Markesinis, B (1994) A matter of style. Law Quarterly Review 110, 607628.Google Scholar
Markesinis, B (2000) Judicial style and judicial reasoning in England and Germany. Cambridge Law Journal 59, 294309.Google Scholar
Merton, RK (1984) Socially expected durations: a case study of concept formation in sociology. In Powell, WW and Robbins, R (eds), Conflict and Consensus: A Festschrift in Honor of Lewis A. Coser. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Meyer-Pritzl, R (2003) Der Urteilsspruch in der europäischen Rechtsgeschichte. In Schulze, R and Seif, U (eds), Richterrecht und Rechtsfortbildung in der Europäischen Rechtsgemeinschaft. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, pp. 4158.Google Scholar
Nelken, D (2012) Using legal culture: purposes and problems. In Nelken, D (ed.), Using Legal Culture. London: Wildy, Simmonds & Hill, pp. 240.Google Scholar
Prosdocimi, L (1962) Tra civilisti è canonisti dei sec. XIII e XIV. A proposito della genesi del concetto di ‘stylus’. In Segoloni, D (ed.), Bartolo da Sassoferrato: Studi i documenti per il VI centenario II. Milano: Giuffrè, pp. 413430.Google Scholar
Ranieri, F (1985) Stilus Curiae: Zum historischen Hintergrund der Relationstechnik. Rechtshistorisches Journal 4, 7588.Google Scholar
Remien, O (1996) Über den Stil des europäischen Privatrechts – Versuch einer Analyse und Prognose. Rabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht 60, 139.Google Scholar
Strätz, H-W (1986) ‘Notizen zu “Stil” und Recht’. In Gumbrecht, HU and Pfeiffer, KL (eds), Stil: Geschichten und Funktionen eines kulturwissenschaftlichen Diskurselements. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, pp. 5367.Google Scholar
Wessely, A (1991) Transposing ‘style’ from the history of art to the history of science. Science in Context 4, 265278.Google Scholar
Wetter, JG (1960) The Styles of Apellate Judicial Opinions: A Case Study in Comparative Law. Leiden: A.W. Sythoff.Google Scholar
Yung, CR (2013) A typology of judging styles. Northwestern University Law Review 107, 17571820.Google Scholar