Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T13:11:57.355Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Forestry Carbon Sequestration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Bjørn Lomborg
Affiliation:
Copenhagen Business School
Get access

Summary

Introduction

There is widespread belief now that forests can be used to reduce the costs of slowing climate change. While the role of forests in the global carbon cycle has long been acknowledged, recent discussions within the context of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (FCCC), as well as efforts to write climate change legislation in the USA, have emphasized the role forests might play. The most recent policy efforts have focused on near-term actions to reduce deforestation in tropical countries.

The rationale for considering forests at all in the policy mix stems partly from the physical components of the issue. The world's forest estate is exceedingly large: It contains roughly 3.9 billion ha of forestland and 1 trillion tons of CO2 (UN Food and Agricultural Organization 2006). Current estimates indicate that roughly 11 million ha each year are lost in tropical regions due to deforestation and conversion of land to agriculture (Houghton 1999, 2003). These losses cause emissions of about 3.6–4.5 billion tons of CO2, so that deforestation accounts for around 17% of global carbon emissions. Countries like Indonesia and Brazil are near the top of total emissions when estimated by country if deforestation is included in carbon emission calculations. Efforts to slow these emissions, of course, could have enormous benefits for society.

Type
Chapter
Information
Smart Solutions to Climate Change
Comparing Costs and Benefits
, pp. 114 - 141
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Antinori, C. and Sathaye, J., 2007: Assessing Transaction Costs of Project-Based Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Report LBNL-57315Google Scholar
Antle, J.M., Capalbo, S.M., Mooney, S., Elliot, E.T., and Paustian, K.H., 2003: Spatial heterogeneity, contract design, and the efficiency of carbon sequestration policies for agriculture, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 46, 231–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaser, J. and Robledo, C., 2008: Initial analysis on the mitigation potential in the forestry sector, Update of a background paper prepared for the UNFCCC Secretariat in August 2007, presented to the International Expert Meeting on Addressing Climate Change through Sustainable Management of Tropical Forests, Yokohama, Japan, April 30–May 2Google Scholar
Cacho, O. and Lipper, L., 2007: Abatement and transaction costs of carbon-sink projects involving smallholders, FEEM Working Paper 27.2007, Fundacion Eni Enrico Mattei, Milan
Eliasch, J., 2008: Climate Change: Financing Global Forests, Office of Climate Change, UK Government, LondonGoogle Scholar
Grieg-Gran, M., 2008: The cost of avoiding deforestation, Update of the Report prepared for The Stern Review of the Economics of Climate Change, Working Paper, International Institute for Environment and Development, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Hoehn, H.F. and Solberg, B., 1994: Potential and economic efficiency of carbon sequestration in forest biomass through silvicultural management, Forest Science 40, 429–51Google Scholar
Houghton, R.A., 1999: The annual net flux of carbon to the atmosphere from changes in land use 1850–1990, Tellus, 51B, 298–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houghton, R.A., 2003: Revised estimates of the annual net flux of carbon to the atmosphere from changes in land use and land management 1850–2000, Tellus, 55b, 378–90Google Scholar
,Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change – Report of Working Group III, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Kurz, W.A. and Apps, M.J., 1999: A 70-year retrospective analysis of carbon fluxes in the Canadian forest sector, Ecological Applications 9(2), 526–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, B., Lubowski, R., and Sohngen, B., 2009: Including international forest carbon incentives in a United States climate policy: understanding the economics, Working Paper, The Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions, Duke University, Durham, NC
Murray, B.C., Sohngen, B., and Ross, M.T., 2007: Economic consequences of consideration of permanence, leakage and additionality for soil carbon sequestration projects, Climatic Change, 80(1–2), 127–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordhaus, W., 2009: A Question of Balance: Weighing the Options on Global Warming Policies, Yale University Press, New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
Nordhaus, W. and Boyer, J., 2000: Warming the World: Economic Models of Global Warming, MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Richards, K. and Stokes, C., 2004: A review of forest carbon sequestration cost studies: a dozen years of research, Climatic Change 63, 1–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searchinger, T., Heimlich, R., Dong, R.A. Houghton, F., Elobeid, A., Fabiosa, J., Tokgoz, S., Hayes, D., and Yu, T-H, 2008: Use of US croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change, Science 319, 1238–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedjo, R.A., 1989: Forests: a tool to moderate global warming?, Environment 31(1), 14–20Google Scholar
Sedjo, R.A., Wisniewski, J., Sample, A.V., and Kinsman, J.D., 1995: The economics of managing carbon via forestry: assessment of existing studies, Environmental and Resource Economics 6, 139–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, W.B., Miles, P.D., Vissage, J.S., and Pugh, S.A., 2003: Forest resources of the United States, 2002, General Technical ReportNC-241, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Research Station, St Paul, MNGoogle Scholar
Sohngen, B., 2008: Paying for avoided deforestation – should we do it?, Choices 23, (1) www.choicemagazine.org/2008–1/theme/2008–1-08.htmGoogle Scholar
Sohngen, B., Andrasko, K., Gytarsky, M., Korovin, G., Laestadius, L., Murray, B., Utkin, A., and Zamolodchikov, D., 2005: Stocks and Flows: Carbon Inventory and Mitigation Potential of the Russian Forest and Land Base, World Resources Institute, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
Sohngen, B., Golub, A., and Hertel, T., 2009: The role of forestry in carbon sequestration in general equilibrium models, chapter 11 in Hertel, T., Rose, S., and Tol, R.. (eds.), Economic Analysis of Land Use in Global Climate Change Policy, Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Sohngen, B. and Brown, S., 2004: Measuring leakage from carbon projects in open economies: a stop timber harvesting project as a case study, Canadian Journal of Forest Research 34, 829–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sohngen, B. and Brown, S., 2006: The influence of conversion of forest types on carbon sequestration and other ecosystem services in the South Central United States, Ecological Economics 57, 698–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sohngen, B. and Brown, S., 2008: Extending timber rotations: carbon and cost implications, Climate Policy 8, 435–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sohngen, B. and Sedjo, R., 2006: Carbon sequestration in global forests under different carbon price regimes, Energy Journal 27, 109–26Google Scholar
Sun, B. and Sohngen, B., 2009: Set-asides for carbon sequestration: implications for permanence and leakage, Climatic Change, published online, July 23, DOI: 10.1007/s10584–009-9628–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tavoni, M., Sohngen, B., and Bosetti, V., 2007: Forestry and the carbon market response to stabilize climate, Energy Policy 35(11), 5346–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,UN Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO), 2006: Global forest resources assessment 2005: progress towards sustainable forest management, FAO Forestry Paper 147, United Nations Food and Agricultural Organization, Rome, www.fao.orgGoogle Scholar
Kooten, G., Cornelis, Alison J. Eagle, Manley, James, and Smolak, Tara, 2004: How costly are carbon offsets? A meta-analysis of carbon forest sinks, Environmental Science & Policy 7, 239–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, D.M., Alig, R.J., McCarl, B.A., Callaway, J.M., and Winnett, S.M., 1999: Minimum cost strategies for sequestering carbon in forests, Land Economics 75, 360–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angelsen, A., Brown, S., Loisel, C., Peskett, L., Streck, C., and Zarin, D., 2009: Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD): an options assessment report, Report prepared for the government of Norway, www.redd-oar.org/links/REDD-OAR_en.pdf
Benitez, P., McCallum, I., Obersteiner, M., and Yamagata, Y., 2004: Global supply for carbon sequestration: identifying least-cost afforestation sites under country risk consideration, Interim Report IR-04–022, International Institute for Applied System Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria
Bosetti, V., Lubowski, R., Golub, A., and Markandya, A., 2009: Linking reduced deforestation and a global carbon market: impacts on costs, financial flows, and technological innovation, FEEM Nota di Lavoro 56.2009, feem.it/NR/rdonlyres/396DBB3D-C57B-4878–9AE6-E493471DDC89/2930/5609.pdf
Böttcher, H., Aoki, K., Cara, S., Gusti, M., Havlik, P., Kindermann, G., Schneider, U.A., and Obersteiner, M., 2008: GHG mitigation potentials and costs from land-use, land-use change and forestry (LULUCF) in Annex 1 countries, GAINS Methodology Report; International Institute for Applied System Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria
Busch, J., Strassburg, B., Cattaneo, A., Lubowski, R., Bolz, F., Ashton, R., Bruner, A., and Rice, D., 2009: Open source impacts of REDD incentives spreadsheet (OSIRIS v2.4), collaborative modeling initiative on REDD economics, www.conservation.org/osiris/Pages/overviews.aspx
Dinan, T. and Orszag, P., 2008: Policy Options for Reducing CO2 Emissions, Congressional Budget Office, US Congress, Washington, DC, February, www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/89xx/doc8934/02-12-Carbon.pdfGoogle Scholar
Dixit, A.K. and Pindyck, R.S., 1994: Investment under Uncertainty (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Eliasch, J., 2008: Climate Change: Financing Global Forests, Office of Climate Change, London, UKGoogle Scholar
,Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 2000: The global outlook for future wood supply from forest plantations, Working Paper GFPOS/WP/03, FAO, Rome
Foley, J.A., Asner, G.P., Costa, M. Heil, Coe, M.T., DeFries, R., Gibbs, H.K., Howard, E.A., Olson, S., Patz, J., Ramankutty, N., and Snyder, P., 2007: Amazonia revealed: forest degradation and loss of ecosystem goods and services in the Amazon Basin, Frontiers in Ecology 5, 25–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golub, A., Fuss, S., Szolgayova, J., and Obersteiner, M., 2009: Effects of low-cost offsets on energy investment: new perspectives on REDD, FEEM Nota di Lavoro 17.2009, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1397144 or http://www.feem.it/NR/rdonlyres/80EAC8FD-07E5–4135-8642–5D959AE95C25/2832/1709.pdf
Gusti, M., Havlik, P., and Obersteiner, M., 2008: Technical description of the IIASA model cluster, The Eliasch Review, Office of Climate Change, London, UK, www.occ.gov.uk/activities/eliasch/Gusti_IIASA_model_cluster.pdf
Gusti, M., Havlik, P., and Obersteiner, M., 2009: How much additional carbon can be stored in forests if economic measures are used and how much could it cost?, Research Reports of the National University of Bioresources and Nature Management of Ukraine, www.nbuv.gov.ua/Portal/chem_biol/nvau/2009_135/9m.pdf
Hansen, J., Mki. Sato, , Kharecha, P., Beerling, D., Berner, R., Masson-Delmotte, V., Pagani, M., Raymo, M., Royer, D.L., and Zachos, J.C., 2008: Target atmospheric CO2: where should humanity aim?, Open Atmospheric Science Journal 2, 217–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kindermann, G., Obersteiner, M., Sohngen, B., Sathaye, J., Andrasko, K., Rametsteiner, E., Schlamadinger, B., Wunder, S., and Beach, R., 2008: Global cost estimates of reducing carbon emissions through avoided deforestation, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105(30), 10302–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lubowski, R., Plantinga, A., and Stavins, R., 2006: Land-use change and carbon sinks: econometric estimation of the carbon sequestration supply function, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 51, 135–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, B., 2008: Leakage from an avoided deforestation compensation policy: concepts, empirical evidence, and corrective policy options, Working Paper 08–02, Nicholas Institute for the Environmental Policy Solutions, Duke University, www.nicholas.duke.edu/institute/wp-leakage.pdf
Murray, B., Lubowski, R., and Sohngen, B., 2009: Including international forest carbon incentives in a United States climate policy: understanding the economics, Working Paper, Nicholas Institute for the Environmental Policy Solutions, Duke University, Durham, NCGoogle Scholar
Murray, B.C., Sohngen, B.L., Sommer, A.J., Depro, B.M., Jones, K.M., McCarl, B.A., Gillig, D., DeAngelo, B., and Andrasko, K., 2005: EPA-R-05–006, Greenhouse gas mitigation potential in US forestry and agriculture, US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Atmospheric Programs, Washington, DC
Naidoo, R. and Iwamura, T., 2007: Global-scale mapping of economic benefits from agricultural lands: implications for conservation priorities,” Biological Conservation 140, 40–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordhaus, W., A Question of Balance: Weighing the Options on Global Warming Policies, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT
Pagiola, S. and Bosquet, B., 2009: Estimating the costs of REDD at the country level, Forest Carbon Partnership Facility, www.forestcarbonpartnership.org/fcp/sites/forestcarbonpartnership.org/files/The%20Costs%20of%20REDD%2004–09-09.pdf
Plantinga, A.J., Mauldin, T., and Miller, D.J., 1999: An econometric analysis of the costs of sequestering carbon in forests, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81, 812–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramankutty, N., Foley, J.A., Norman, J., and McSweeney, K., 2002: The global distribution of cultivable lands: current patterns and sensitivity to possible climate change, Global Ecology & Biogeography 11, 377–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sohngen, B. and Mendelsohn, R., 2003: An optimal control model of forest carbon sequestration, American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 85(2), 448–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sohngen, B. and Mendelsohn, R., 2007: A sensitivity analysis of carbon sequestration, chapter 19 in Schlesinger, M., Kheshgi, H.S., Smith, J., Chesnaye, F.C., Reilly, J.M., Wilson, T., and Kolstad, C. (eds.), Human-Induced Climate Change: An Interdisciplinary Assessment, Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Stavins, R., 1999: The costs of carbon sequestration: a revealed preference approach, American Economic Review 89, 994–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tavoni, M., Sohngen, B., and Bosetti, V., 2007: Forestry and the carbon market response to stabilize climate, Energy Policy 35, 5346–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velthuizen, H.et al., 2007: Mapping biophysical factors that influence agricultural production and rural vulnerability, Environment and Natural Resources Series XI, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Rome
Wise, M.et al., 2009: Implications of Limiting CO2 concentrations for land use and energy, Science 324, 1183–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×