Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T02:47:29.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reversible Hydrogen Absorption/Desorption and Related Lattice Deformation of Ti3Al Based Alloys in the Ti-Al-Nb System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

Kazuhiro Ito
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606–8501, Japan
Lanting T. Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606–8501, Japan
Yoshiharu Okabe
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606–8501, Japan
Vijay K. Vasudevan
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, 45221–0012, U.S.A.
Masaharu Yamaguchi
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606–8501, Japan
Get access

Abstract

Hydrogen absorption/desorption of Ti3Al-based alloys with α2 single-phase, β0 single-phase and β/O two-phase microstructures was investigated to obtain systematic understanding microstructure effects. On exposing all the alloys to hydrogen, β (βH) and γ (γH) hydrides are formed. The βH and γH have bcc and bct (close to fcc) based structures, respectively. The hydrogen/metal ratio of the γH is larger than that of βH. Thus, solute hydrogen in Ti3Al based alloys stabilizes the bcc-based phase just like Nb, regardless of their original structure before hydrogenation. On the other hand, reversible hydrogen absorption/desorption around 100°C and related reversible βHH transformation was observed in β/O two-phase (Ti,Nb)3Al and α2-Ti3Al alloys, but not obviously observed in a β0-(Ti,Nb)3Al alloy. In forming the βH, the expansion of the β0 and β phases occurred isotropically keeping their structures B2 and bcc, respectively. In contrast, the O and α2 phases expanded in anisotropic manner. The lattice deformation for the βH→γH transformation can be described similarly to those for the O→βH and α2→βH transformations. Such lattice deformation in anisotropic manner most likely agrees with that observed in a martensitic displacive transformation, because of the surface relief observed on the γH after the βH→γH transformation in the β0-(Ti,Nb)3Al alloy and many twins formed during the α2→βH transformation in the α2-Ti3Al alloy. Mechanisms of the reversible βHH transformation in the β/O two-phase (Ti,Nb)3Al and α2-Ti3Al alloys was proposed on the basis of similarities in the lattice deformation and ordering of hydrogen atoms required for the βHH, O-βH and α2H transformations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Ito, K., Zhang, L.T., Vasudevan, V.K., and Yamaguchi, M., Acta Mater. 49, 963 (2001).Google Scholar
2. Zhang, L.T., Ito, K., Vasudevan, V.K., and Yamaguchi, M., Acta Mater. 49, 751 (2001).Google Scholar
3. Zhang, L.T., Ito, K., Vasudevan, V.K., and Yamaguchi, M., Intermetallics 9, 1045 (2001).Google Scholar
4. Ito, K., Okabe, Y., Zhang, L.T., and Yamaguchi, M., Acta Mater. 50, 4901 (2002).Google Scholar
5. Zhang, L.T., Ito, K., Vasudevan, V.K., and Yamaguchi, M., Acta Mater. in press.Google Scholar
6. Banerjee, D., Gogia, A.K., Nandy, T.K., Muraleedharan, K. and Mishra, R.S., in Structural Intermetallics, edited by Darolia, R., Lewandowski, J.J., Liu, C.T., Martin, P.L., Miracle, D.B. and Nathal, M.V., (TMS, Warrendale, Pennsylvnia, PA, 1993), pp. 19.Google Scholar
7. Bendersky, L. A., Boettinger, W.J., and Roytburd, A., Acta metall. Mater. 39, 1959 (1991).Google Scholar
8. Bendersky, L. A., and Boettinger, W.J., J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. 98, 585 (1993).Google Scholar
9. Boehlert, C.J., Majumdar, B.S., Seetharaman, V., and Miracle, D.E., Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 30A, 2305 (1999).Google Scholar
10. Banerjee, D., Gogia, A.K., Nandy, T.K., and Joshi, V.A., Acta metall. 36, 871 (1988).Google Scholar
11. Muraleedharan, K., Banerjee, D., Banerjee, S., and Lele, S., Phil. Mag. A 71, 1011 (1995).Google Scholar
12. Chu, W.Y., and Thompson, A.W., Metall. Trans. A 22A, 71 (1991).Google Scholar
13. Thompson, P., Pick, M.A., Reidinger, F., Corliss, L.M., Hastings, J.M., and Reilly, J.J., J. Phys. F 8, L75 (1978).Google Scholar
14. Fischer, P., Halg, W., Schlapbach, L., Stucki, F., and Andresen, A.F., Mater. Res. Bull. 13, 931 (1978).Google Scholar
15. Schefer, J., Fischer, P., Halg, W., Stucki, F., Schlapbach, L., and Andresen, A.F., Mater. Res. Bull. 14, 1281 (1979).Google Scholar
16. Asano, H., and Hirabayashi, M., “Neutron Diffraction Studies of Metal Hydrides,” Metal Hydrides, ed. Bambakidis, G. (Plenum, 1981) pp. 81103.Google Scholar
17. Nakamura, Y., Oikawa, K., Kamiyama, T., and Akiba, E., J. Alloys Comp. 316, 284 (2001).Google Scholar
18. Ito, K., Okabe, Y., Hoshikawa, A., Kamiyama, T., and Yamaguchi, M., in preparation.Google Scholar