Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T16:36:13.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Object narratives as a methodology for mitigating marine plastic pollution: multidisciplinary investigations in Galápagos

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2020

John Schofield Open the ORCID record for John Schofield [Opens in a new window] ,
Kayleigh J. Wyles ,
Sean Doherty Open the ORCID record for Sean Doherty [Opens in a new window] ,
Andy Donnelly ,
Jen Jones  and
Adam Porter Open the ORCID record for Adam Porter [Opens in a new window]
John Schofield*
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of York, UK
Kayleigh J. Wyles
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, University of Surrey, UK
Sean Doherty
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of York, UK
Andy Donnelly
Affiliation:
Galapagos Conservation Trust, London, UK
Jen Jones
Affiliation:
Department of Biosciences, Exeter, UK
Adam Porter
Affiliation:
Department of Biosciences, Exeter, UK
*
*Author for correspondence: ✉ john.schofield@york.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Marine plastic pollution is a global environmental concern. With reference to approaches in contemporary archaeology, object biographies and psychology, this article presents the application of a novel participatory (‘World Café’) methodology that aims both to understand how marine plastic pollution occurs and to demonstrate the value of the approach for encouraging behaviour change. As proof of concept, the authors present the preliminary results of fieldwork involving local people in the Galápagos archipelago to demonstrate the benefits of an archaeological approach in developing new frameworks to help mitigate this critical environmental threat.

Keywords

Galápagoscontemporary archaeologymarine pollutionobject biographyWorld Café
Type
Research Article
Information
Antiquity , Volume 94 , Issue 373 , February 2020 , pp. 228 - 244
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd, 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arthur, C., Baker, J. & Bamford, H. (ed.). 2009. Proceedings of the International Research Workshop on the Occurrence, Effects and Fate of Microplastic Marine Debris. Sept 9–11, 2008 (NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS-ORandR-30). Washington, D.C.: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.Google Scholar
Association of Plastic Manufacturers. 2019. Plastic: the facts 2019. An analysis of European plastics production, demand and waste data. Brussels: Plastics Europe. Available online at: https://www.plasticseurope.org/application/files/1115/7236/4388/FINAL_web_version_Plastics_the_facts2019_14102019.pdf (accessed 28 November 2019).Google Scholar
Bailey, G., Newland, C., Nilsson, A. & Schofield, J.. 2009. Transit, transition: excavating J641 VUJ. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 19: 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774309000018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barthes, R. 1972 [1957]. Plastic, in Mythologies, translated by Lavers, A.: 97–99. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.Google Scholar
Beaumont, N.J., Aaneson, M., Austen, M., Börger, T., Clark, J.R., Cole, M., Hooper, T., Lindeque, P.K., Pascoe, C. & Wyles, K.J.. 2019. Global ecological, social and economic impacts of marine plastic. Marine Pollution Bulletin 142: 189–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.03.022CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Besseling, E. et al. 2015. Microplastic in a macro filter feeder: humpback whale Megaptera novaeangliae. Marine Pollution Bulletin 95: 248–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.04.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carson, L. 2011. Designing a public conversation using the World Café method. Social Alternatives 30: 10–14.Google Scholar
van Cauwenberghe, L. & Janssen, C.R.. 2014. Microplastics in bivalves cultured for human consumption. Environmental Pollution 193: 65–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2014.06.010CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duffy, P.R.J. & Popple, S.. 2017. Pararchive and island stories: collaborative co-design and community digital heritage on the Isle of Bute. Internet Archaeology 46. https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.46.4Google Scholar
Fanini, L. & Fahd, S.. 2009. Storytelling and environmental information: connecting schoolchildren and herpetofauna in Morocco. Integrative Zoology 4: 178–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-4877.2009.00158.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fouché, C. & Light, G.. 2011. An invitation to dialogue: ‘The World Café’ in social work research. Qualitative Social Work 10: 28–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325010376016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabrys, J., Hawkins, G. & Michael, M. (ed.). 2013. Accumulation: the material politics of plastic. London & New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203070215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gall, S.C. & Thompson, R.C.. 2015. The impact of debris on marine life. Marine Pollution Bulletin 92: 170–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.12.041CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galloway, T., Cole, M. & Lewis, C.. 2017. Interactions of microplastic debris throughout the marine ecosystem. Nature Ecology & Evolution 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0116CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geyer, R., Jambeck, J.R. & Law, K.L.. 2017. Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. Science Advances 3(7): e1700782. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1700782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gislason, M.K., Morgan, V.S., Mitchell-Foster, K. & Parkes, M.W.. 2018. Voices from the landscape: storytelling as emergent counter-narratives and collective action from northern BC watersheds. Health and Place 54: 191–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2018.08.024CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gosden, C. & Marshall, Y.. 1999. The cultural biography of objects. World Archaeology 31: 169–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.1999.9980439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, R. & Schofield, J.. 2010. After modernity: archaeological approaches to the contemporary past. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, G. 2018. Plastic and presentism: the time of disposability. Journal of Contemporary Archaeology 5: 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1558/jca.33291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herman, D. 2009. Basic elements of narrative. London: Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444305920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphries, C. & Smith, A.. 2014. Talking objects: towards a post-social research framework for exploring object narratives. Organization 21: 477–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508414527253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Izurieta, J.C. 2017. Behaviour and trends in tourism in Galápagos between 2007 and 2015, in Galápagos Report 2015–16: 83–89. Puerto Ayora: GNPD, GCREG, CDF & GC.Google Scholar
Jamieson, R. 2018. A bullet for Señor Cobos: anarchy in the Galápagos. Journal of Contemporary Archaeology 5: 268–75. https://doi.org/10.1558/jca.33579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joy, J. 2009. Reinvigorating object biography: reproducing the drama of object lives. World Archaeology 41: 540–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438240903345530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kershaw, P.J. & Rochman, C.M. (ed.). 2016. Sources, fate and effects of microplastics in the marine environment: part two of a global assessment (GESAMP Reports and Studies 93). London: International Maritime Organisation.Google Scholar
Kopytoff, I. 1986. The cultural biography of things: commoditisation as process, in Appadurai, A. (ed.) The social life of things: commodities in cultural perspective: 64–91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819582.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kühn, S., Bravo Rebolledo, E.L. & Van Franeker, J.A.. 2015. Deleterious effects of litter on marine life, in Bergmann, M., Gutow, L. & Klages, M. (ed.) Marine anthropogenic litter: 75–116. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kvan, T. & Karakiewicz, J. (ed.). 2019. Urban Galapagos: transition to sustainability in complex adaptive systems. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99534-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lange, M. & van Sebille, E.. 2017. Parcels v0.9: prototyping a Lagrangian ocean analysis framework for the petascale age. Geoscientific Model Development 10: 4175–86. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4175-2017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, B. 2007. Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lavers, J.L., Dicks, L., Dicks, M.R. & Finger, A.. 2019. Significant plastic accumulation on the Cocos (Keeling) Islands, Australia. Nature Scientific Reports 9: 7102. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43375- 4Google ScholarPubMed
Madden, O. et al. (ed.). 2012. The age of plastic: ingenuity and responsibility: proceedings of the 2012 MCI Symposium (Smithsonian Institution to Museum Conservation 7). Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
Mestanza, C., Botero, C.M., Anfuso, G., Adolfo Chica-Ruiz, A., Pranzini, E. & Mooser, A.. 2019. Beach litter in Ecuador and the Galapagos Islands: a baseline to enhance environmental conservation and sustainable tourism. Marine Pollution Bulletin 140: 573–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.02.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreu, B.C. & Goméz, D.L.. 2019. Intimate with your junk! A waste management experiment for the material world. The Sociological Review Monographs 67: 318–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026119830318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, A. 2011. Contemporary archaeology in transit: the artefacts of a 1991 van. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 15: 138–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10761-010-0131-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obbard, R.W., Sadri, S., Wong, Y.Q., Khitun, A.A., Baker, I. & Thompson, R.C.. 2014. Global warming releases microplastic legacy frozen in Arctic sea ice. Earth's Future 1: 315–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014EF000240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, B. 2003. Material culture after text: re-membering things. Norwegian Archaeological Review 36: 87–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/00293650310000650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pétursdóttir, D. 2017. Climate change? Archaeology and Anthropocene. Archaeological Dialogues 24: 175–205. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203817000216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prewitt, V. 2011. Working in the café: lessons in group dialogue. The Learning Organization 18: 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1108/09696471111123252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quiroga, D. 2009. Crafting nature: the Galápagos and the making and unmaking of a ‘natural laboratory’. Journal of Political Ecology: Case Studies in History and Society 16: 123–40. https://doi.org/10.2458/v16i1.21695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reno, J. 2013. Waste, in Graves-Brown, P., Harrison, R. & Piccini, A. (ed.) The Oxford handbook of the archaeology of the contemporary world: 261–72. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199602001.013.052Google Scholar
van Sebille, E., Delandmeter, P., Schofield, J., Hardesty, P.D., Jones, J. & Dinnelly, A.. 2019. Basin-scale sources and pathways of microplastic that ends up in the Galápagos Archipelago. Ocean Science 15: 1341–49. https://doi.org/10.5194/os-15-1341-2019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuyler, Q.A., Wilcox, C., Townsend, K., Hardesty, B.D. & Marshall, N.J.. 2014. Mistaken identity? Visual similarities of marine debris to natural prey items of sea turtles. BMC Ecology 14: 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6785-14-14CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shennan, S.J. 1988. Quantifying archaeology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Sherrington, C. 2016. Plastics in the marine environment. Available at: https://www.eunomia.co.uk/reports-tools/plastics-in-the-marine-environment (accessed 28 November 2019).Google Scholar
Sosna, D. & Brunclikova, L. (ed.). 2017. Archaeologies of waste: encounters with the unwanted. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
von Stackelberg, P. & McDowell, A.. 2015. What in the world? Storyworlds, science fiction, and futures studies. Journal of Futures Studies 20(2): 25–56.Google Scholar
Taylor, J.E., Hardner, J. & Stewart, M.. 2009. Ecotourism and economic growth in the Galapagos: an island economy-wide analysis. Environment and Development Economics 14: 139–62. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X08004646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, J. 1996. Time, culture and identity: an interpretive archaeology. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thompson, R.C., Moore, C., vom Saal, F.S. & Swan, S.H.. 2009. Plastics, the environment and human health: current consensus and future trends. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 364: 2153–66. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0053CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turkle, S. 2007. Evocative objects: things we think. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wilcox, C., van Sebille, E. & Hardesty, B.D.. 2015. Threat of plastic pollution to seabirds is global, pervasive, and increasing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 112: 11899–904. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1502108112CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woodall, L.C., Sanchez-Vidal, A., Canals, M., Paterson, G.L., Coppock, R., Sleight, V. & Thompson, R.C.. 2014. The deep sea is a major sink for microplastic debris. Royal Society Open Science 1(4). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.140317CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, S.L. & Kelly, F.J.. 2017. Plastic and human health: a micro issue? Environmental Science and Technology 51: 6634–47. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b00423CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wyles, K.J., Pahl, S., Thomas, K. & Thompson, R.C.. 2016. Factors that can undermine the psychological benefits of coastal environments: exploring the effect of tidal state, presence, and type of litter. Environment and Behavior 48: 1095–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916515592177CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed