Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T01:58:06.751Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Coattails, Raincoats, and Congressional Election Outcomes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2019

Steven Rogers
Steven Rogers*
Affiliation:
Saint Louis University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

More than 60 years ago, Angus Campbell offered an explanation for why the president’s party regularly loses congressional seats in midterm elections. He argued that peripheral voters “surge” to the polls in presidential elections and support the president’s congressional co-partisans but “decline” to turn out in the midterm. In his turnout-based explanation for midterm loss, Campbell speculated that “bad weather or an epidemic may affect the vote” but largely dismissed weather’s utility to test his theory (Campbell 1960, 399). I revisit Campbell’s speculation and employ a new identification strategy to investigate the “surge and decline” account of midterm loss. I show that as the costs of voting increase—due to above-average rainfall on Election Day—the strength of the relationship between presidential and congressional voting weakens.

Type
Article
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 52 , Issue 2 , April 2019 , pp. 251 - 255
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abramowitz, Alan I., Cover, Albert D., and Norpoth, Helmut. 1986. “The President’s Party in Midterm Elections: Going from Bad to Worse.” American Journal of Political Science 30 (3): 562–76. doi: 10.2307/2111090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aiken, Leona S., and West, Stephen G.. 1991. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, and Rosenthal, Howard. 1989. “Partisan Cycles in Congressional Elections and the Macroeconomy.” American Political Science Review 83 (2): 373–98. doi: 10.2307/1962396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Michael A., and Fullmer, Elliott B.. 2011. “Balancing in the U.S. States, 1978–2009.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 11 (2): 148–66. doi: 10.1177/1532440011406230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blais, André. 2006. “What Affects Voter Turnout?” Annual Review of Political Science 9 (1): 111–25. Available at https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.9.070204.105121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boockoff-Bajdek, Michelle. 2016. “Drive Broadcast Revenue with Election Day Forecasts.” The Weather Company. Available at https://business.weather.com/writable/documents/Media/Voter-Survey-White-Paper_042016.pdf.Google Scholar
Brambor, Thomas, Clark, William Roberts, and Golder, Matt. 2006. “Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses.” Political Analyses 14 (1): 63–82.10.1093/pan/mpi014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broockman, David E. 2009. “Do Congressional Candidates Have Reverse Coattails? Evidence from a Regression Discontinuity Design.” Political Analysis 17 (4): 418–34. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpp013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burden, Barry C., and Kimball, David C.. 1998. “A New Approach to the Study of Ticket Splitting.” American Political Science Review 92 (3): 533–44. doi: 10.2307/2585479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvert, Randall L., and Ferejohn, John A.. 1983. “Coattail Voting in Recent Presidential Elections.” American Political Science Review 77 (2): 407–19.10.2307/1958925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Angus. 1960. “Surge and Decline: A Study of Electoral Change.” Public Opinion Quarterly 24 (3): 397–418. doi: 10.2307/2746724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, James E. 1985. “Explaining Presidential Losses in Midterm Congressional Elections.” Journal of Politics 47 (4): 1140–57. doi: 10.2307/2130810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, Wendy K. Tam, and Gaines, Brian J.. 2004. “The Limits of Ecological Inference: The Case of Split-Ticket Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 48 (1): 152–71. doi: 10.2307/1519903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clubb, Jerome M., Flanigan, William H., and Zingale, Nancy H.. 2006. “Electoral Data for Counties in the United States: Presidential and Congressional Races, 1840–1972.” Ann Arbor, MI: Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2006-11-13. doi: 10.3886/ICPSR08611.v1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cover, Albert D. 1985. “Surge and Decline in Congressional Elections.” Western Political Quarterly 38 (4): 606–19. doi: 10.2307/448615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denardo, James. 1987. “Declining Turnout in an Era of Waning Partisanship.” British Journal of Political Science 17 (4): 435–56. doi: 10.1017/S0007123400004865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, Robert S. 1988. “The Puzzle of Midterm Loss.” Journal of Politics 50 (4): 1011–29. doi: 10.2307/2131389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, Robert S. 2010. “Explaining Midterm Loss: The Tandem Effects of Withdrawn Coattails and Balancing.” Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert S., Folke, Olle, and Snyder, James M.. 2015. “A Gubernatorial Helping Hand? How Governors Affect Presidential Elections.” Journal of Politics 77 (2): 491–504.10.1086/680186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferejohn, John A., and Calvert, Randall L.. 1984. “Presidential Coattails in a Historical Perspective.” American Journal of Political Science 28 (1): 127–46.10.2307/2110790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1996. Divided Government. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Fowler, Anthony. 2015. “Regular Voters, Marginal Voters and the Electoral Effects of Turnout.” Political Science Research and Methods 3 (2): 205–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraga, Bernard, and Hersh, Eitan. 2011. “Voting Costs and Voter Turnout in Competitive Elections.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 5 (4): 339–56. doi: 10.1561/100.00010093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godbout, Jean-François. 2013. “Turnout and Presidential Coattails in Congressional Elections.” Public Choice 157 (1–2): 333–56. doi: 10.1007/s11127-012-9947-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez, Brad T., Hansford, Thomas G., and Krause, George A.. 2007. “The Republicans Should Pray for Rain: Weather, Turnout, and Voting in U.S. Presidential Elections.” Journal of Politics 69 (3): 649–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00565.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansford, Thomas G., and Gomez, Brad T.. 2010. “Estimating the Electoral Effects of Voter Turnout.” American Political Science Review 104 (2): 268–88. doi: 10.1017/S0003055410000109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, John, and Brooks, John. 2016. “Mediating the Electoral Connection: The Information Effects of Voter Signals on Legislative Behavior.” Journal of Politics 78 (3): 653–69.10.1086/685380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogan, Robert E. 2005. “Gubernatorial Coattail Effects in State Legislative Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 58 (4): 587–97. doi: 10.1177/106591290505800406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research. 2013. “General Election Data for the United States, 1950–1990.” Ann Arbor, MI: Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2013-11-22. doi: 10.3886/ICPSR00013.v2.Google Scholar
Keith, Bruce E., Magleby, David, Nelson, Candice, Orr, Elizabeth, Westlye, Mark, and Wolfinger, Raymond. 1992. The Myth of the Independent Voter. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kernell, Samuel. 1977. “Presidential Popularity and Negative Voting: An Alternative Explanation of the Midterm Congressional Decline of the President’s Party.” American Political Science Review 71 (1): 44–66. doi: 10.2307/1956953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, V. O. 1964. Politics, Parties, & Pressure Groups . New York: Crowell.Google Scholar
Klarner, Carl. 2012. “County-Level Congressional Election Results: 1992–1996.”Google Scholar
Kramer, Gerald H. 1983. “The Ecological Fallacy Revisited: Aggregate- Versus Individual-Level Findings on Economics and Elections, and Sociotropic Voting.” American Political Science Review 77 (1): 92–111. doi: 10.2307/1956013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lublin, David, and Voss, D. Stephen. 2001. “Federal Elections Project.” Washington, DC: American University, and Lexington: University of Kentucky.Google Scholar
Mattei, Franco, and Glasgow, Joshua. 2005. “Presidential Coattails, Incumbency Advantage, and Open Seats: A District-Level Analysis of the 1976–2000 U.S. House Elections.” Electoral Studies 24 (4): 619–41. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2004.10.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meredith, Marc. 2013. “Exploiting Friends-and-Neighbors to Estimate Coattail Effects.” American Political Science Review 107 (4): 742–65. doi: 10.1017/S0003055413000439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Warren E. 1955. “Presidential Coattails: A Study in Political Myth and Methodology.” Public Opinion Quarterly 19 (4): 353–68.10.1086/266585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondak, Jeffery J. 1993. “Presidential Coattails and Open Seats: The District-Level Impact of Heuristic Processing.” American Politics Research 21 (3): 307–19.10.1177/1532673X9302100305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheve, Kenneth, and Tomz, Michael. 1999. “Electoral Surprise and the Midterm Loss in US Congressional Elections.” British Journal of Political Science 29 (3): 507–21.10.1017/S000712349900023XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tufte, Edward R. 1975. “Determinants of the Outcomes of Midterm Congressional Elections.” American Political Science Review 69 (3): 812–26. doi: 10.2307/1958391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Rogers supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Rogers supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 256.1 KB