Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T02:26:13.938Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Competency of aMCI patients to consent to cholinesterase treatment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2019

Etsuko Oshima
Affiliation:
Department of Neuropsychiatry, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
Shintaro Takenoshita
Affiliation:
Department of Neuropsychiatry, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
Risa Iwai
Affiliation:
Department of Neuropsychiatry, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
Mayumi Yabe
Affiliation:
Department of Neuropsychiatry, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
Nao Imai
Affiliation:
Department of Neuropsychiatry, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
Makiko Horiuchi
Affiliation:
Department of Neuropsychiatry, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
Naoya Takeda
Affiliation:
Department of Neuropsychiatry, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
Yosuke Uchitomi
Affiliation:
Innovation Center for Supportive, Palliative and Psychosocial Care, National Cancer Center Hospital, & Behavioral and Survivorship Research Group, Center for Public Health Sciences, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan
Norihito Yamada
Affiliation:
Department of Neuropsychiatry, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
Seishi Terada*
Affiliation:
Department of Neuropsychiatry, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Seishi Terada, Department of Neuropsychiatry, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama 700-8558, Japan. Phone: +81-86-235-7242; Fax: +81-86-235-7246. Email: terada@okayama-u.ac.jp.

Abstract

Background:

In medical practice, a patient’s loss of competency is a major obstacle when choosing a treatment and a starting treatment program smoothly. A large number of studies have revealed the lack of medical competency in patients with dementia. However, there have been only a few reports focusing on the capacity of patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to make a medical choice.

Methods:

In this study, we evaluated the competency of 40 patients with amnestic MCI (aMCI) and 33 normal subjects to make a medical choice using the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool-Treatment (MacCAT-T). We compared the judgement of a team conference using the recorded semi-structured interview with the clinical judgement of a chief clinician.

Results:

A team conference concluded that 12 aMCI patients had no competency, and the clinical judgement, without any special interview, judged that five aMCI patients had no competency. All subjects in the control groups were judged to be competent to consent to treatment by both clinicians and the team conference.

Conclusions:

Without supplementary tools such as explanatory documents, not a few patients with aMCI were judged by a team conference to have no competency to consent to therapy even in a relatively simple and easy case. In contrast, clinical physicians tended to evaluate the competency of aMCI patients in a generous manner.

Type
Original Research Article
Copyright
© International Psychogeriatric Association 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albert, M. S. et al. (2011). The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement, 7, 270–279. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed., text revision) (DSM-IV-TR). Washington, DC: APA.Google Scholar
Appelbaum, P. S. (2007). Clinical practice. Assessment of patients’ competence to consent to treatment. The New England Journal of Medicine, 357, 1834–1840. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp074045.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E. and McHugh, P. R. (1975). Mini-mental state: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grisso, T. and Appelbaum, P. S. (1998). Assessing Competence to Consent to Treatment. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grisso, T., Appelbaum, P. S. and Hill-Fotouhi, C. (1997). The MacCAT-T: a clinical tool to assess patients’ capacities to make treatment decisions. Psychiatric Services, 48, 1415–1419.Google ScholarPubMed
Hayashi, S. et al. (2013). Burden of caregivers for patients with mild cognitive impairment in Japan. International Psychogeriatrics, 25, 1357–1363. doi: 10.1017/S1041610213000537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, A. L., Lambe, S., Moser, D. J., Byerly, L. K., Ozonoff, A. and Karlawish, J. H. (2008). Decisional capacity for research participation in individuals with mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 56, 1236–1243. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01752.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marson, D. C., McInturff, B., Hawkins, L., Bartolucci, A. and Harrell, L. E. (1997a). Consistency of physician judgments of capacity to consent in mild Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 45, 453–457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marson, D. C., Hawkins, L., McInturff, B. and Harrell, L. E. (1997b). Cognitive models that predict physician judgments of capacity to consent in mild Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 45, 458–464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Okonkwo, O. et al. (2007). Medical decision-making capacity in patients with mild cognitive impairment. Neurology, 69, 1528–1535. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000277639.90611.d9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Okonkwo, O. C. et al. (2008). Medical decision-making capacity in mild cognitive impairment: a 3-year longitudinal study. Neurology, 71, 1474–1480. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000334301.32358.48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Owen, G. S., Richardson, G., David, A. S., Szmukler, G., Hayward, P. and Hotopf, M. (2008). Mental capacity to make decisions on treatment in people admitted to psychiatric hospitals: cross sectional study. BMJ, 337, a448. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39580.546597.BE.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sessums, L. L., Zembrzuska, H. and Jackson, J. L. (2011). Does this patient have medical decision-making capacity? JAMA, 306, 420–427. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1023.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sugishita, M. (2012). Mini Mental State Examination-Japanese. Tokyo: Nihon Bunka Kagakusha.Google Scholar