Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T12:34:29.050Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction to the Issue

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2015

Karl Storchmann
Karl Storchmann*
Affiliation:
New York University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Introduction
Information
Journal of Wine Economics , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , May 2015 , pp. 1 - 3
Copyright
Copyright © American Association of Wine Economists 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amerine, M.A. and Roessler, E.B. (1976). Wines. Their Sensory Evaluation. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
Ashenfelter, O. and Storchmann, K. (2012). The Judgment of Princeton and other articles. Journal of Wine Economics, 7(2), 139–142.Google Scholar
Ashton, R.H. (2011). Improving experts’ wine quality judgments: Two heads are better than one. Journal of Wine Economics, 6(2), 135–159.Google Scholar
Ashton, R.H. (2012). Reliability and consensus of experienced wine judges: Expertise within and between? Journal of Wine Economics, 7(1), 70–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashton, R.H. (2013). Is there consensus among wine quality ratings of prominent critics? An empirical analysis of red Bordeaux, 2004–2010. Journal of Wine Economics, 8(2), 225–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodington, J.C. (2012). 804 tastes: Evidence on preference, randomness and value from double-blind wine tastings. Journal of Wine Economics, 7(2), 181–191.Google Scholar
Bodington, J.C. (2015). Evaluating wine-tasting results and randomness with a mixture of rank preference models. Journal of Wine Economics, 10(1), 31–46.Google Scholar
Cao, J. (2014). Quantifying randomness versus consensus in wine quality ratings. Journal of Wine Economics, 9(2), 202–213.Google Scholar
Cao, J. and Stokes, L. (2010). The evaluation of wine judge performance through three characteristics: Bias, discrimination, and variation. Journal of Wine Economics, 5(1), 132–142.Google Scholar
Cicchetti, D.V. (2007). Assessing the reliability of blind wine tasting: Differentiating levels of clinical and statistical meaningfulness. Journal of Wine Economics, 2(2), 196–202.Google Scholar
Ginsburgh, V. and Zang, I. (2012). Shapley ranking of wines. Journal of Wine Economics, 7(2), 169–180.Google Scholar
Hodgson, R.T. (2008). An examination of judge reliability at a major U.S. wine competition. Journal of Wine Economics, 3(2), 105–113.Google Scholar
Hodgson, R.T. (2009). An analysis of the concordance among 13 U.S. wine competitions. Journal of Wine Economics, 4(1), 1–9.Google Scholar
Hodgson, R.T. and Cao, J. (2014). Criteria for accrediting expert wine judges. Journal of Wine Economics, 9(1), 62–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masset, P., Weisskopf, J.-P. and Cossutta, M. (2015). Wine tasters, ratings, and en primeur prices. Journal of Wine Economics, 10(1), 75–107.Google Scholar
Masson, J. and Aurier, P. (2015). Should it be told or tasted? Impact of sensory versus nonsensory cues on the categorization of low-alcohol. Journal of Wine Economics, 10(1), 62–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olkin, I., Lou, Y., Stokes, L. and Cao, J. (2015). Analyses of wine-tasting data: a tutorial. Journal of Wine Economics, 10(1), 4–30.Google Scholar
Quandt, R.E. (2006). Measurement and inference in wine tasting. Journal of Wine Economics, 1(1), 7–30.Google Scholar
Quandt, R.E. (2007). A note on a test for the sum of ranksums. Journal of Wine Economics, 2(1), 98–102.Google Scholar
Stuen, E., Miller, J. and Stone, R. (2015). An analysis of wine critic consensus: A study of Washington and California wines. Journal of Wine Economics, 10(1), 47–61.Google Scholar