Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T16:15:19.072Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Biopolymers as Novel Tool for Self-Sealing and Self-Healing of Mortar

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2016

Arn Mignon ,
Peter Dubruel ,
Sandra Van Vlierberghe  and
Nele De Belie
Arn Mignon
Affiliation:
Magnel Laboratory for Concrete Research, Department of Structural Engineering, Technologiepark Zwijnaarde 904, B-9052 Ghent University, Belgium Polymer Chemistry and Biomaterials Group, Department of Organic and Macromolecular Chemistry, Krijgslaan 281, Building S4-bis, B-9000 Ghent University, Belgium
Peter Dubruel
Affiliation:
Polymer Chemistry and Biomaterials Group, Department of Organic and Macromolecular Chemistry, Krijgslaan 281, Building S4-bis, B-9000 Ghent University, Belgium
Sandra Van Vlierberghe
Affiliation:
Polymer Chemistry and Biomaterials Group, Department of Organic and Macromolecular Chemistry, Krijgslaan 281, Building S4-bis, B-9000 Ghent University, Belgium
Nele De Belie
Affiliation:
Magnel Laboratory for Concrete Research, Department of Structural Engineering, Technologiepark Zwijnaarde 904, B-9052 Ghent University, Belgium
Get access

Abstract

Synthetic superabsorbent polymers (SAPs) are used in concrete for various applications such as internal curing and frost resistance. However, the addition of these SAPs may lead to a significant decrease in mortar strength, especially when high amounts of SAP are necessary. This is the case for example when self-sealing and -healing of cracks is strived at. In order to overcome this bottleneck, the present work focuses on the application of biopolymers as SAPs. The work especially aims to evaluate the potential of both sodium alginate (NaAlg) as well as physically cross-linked calcium alginate (CaAlg) as SAPs to establish a sustainable approach towards self-sealing and -healing concrete without impairing mechanical strength. First, the swelling properties in both demineralized water and cement filtrate solution are tested. Subsequently, the mechanical properties of mortar mixtures in the absence and the presence of SAPs are compared by performing flexural and compressive tests. The alginates show a swelling capacity up to 72 times their own weight in aqueous solutions. Interestingly, they lead to a minor reduction in compression strength (up to 15% upon addition of 1m% SAP). These biopolymers show high potential for enabling concrete repair, more specifically, for the self-sealing and -healing of cracks without impairing the strength.

Keywords

compositebiologicalpolymer
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1813: Symposium 6C – Effect of SCM and Smart additives on the properties of concrete structures—2015 , 2016 , imrc2015-o011
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Meyer, C., Cement and Concrete Composites 31 (8), 601–605 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Y., Lepech, M. D., Yang, E.-H. and Li, V. C., Cement and Concrete Research 39 (5), 382–390 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snoeck, D., Van Tittelboom, K., De Belie, N., Steuperaert, S. and Dubruel, P., presented at the Concrete Repair, Rehabilitation and Retrofitting III: 3rd International Conference on Concrete Repair, Rehabilitation and Retrofitting, ICCRRR-3, 3–5 September 2012, Cape Town, South Africa, 2012 (unpublished).Google Scholar
Zohuriaan-Mehr, M. J., Omidian, H., Doroudiani, S. and Kabiri, K., J Mater Sci 45 (21), 5711–5735 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abd Alla, S. G., Sen, M. and El-Naggar, A. W. M., Carbohydrate Polymers 89 (2), 478–485 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mechtcherine, V., Gorges, M., Schroefl, C., Assmann, A., Brameshuber, W., Ribeiro, A., Cusson, D., Custódio, J., da Silva, E., Ichimiya, K., Igarashi, S.-i., Klemm, A., Kovler, K., de Mendonça Lopes, A., Lura, P., Nguyen, V., Reinhardt, H.-W., Filho, R., Weiss, J., Wyrzykowski, M., Ye, G. and Zhutovsky, S., Mat. Struct. 47 (3), 541–562 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laustsen, S., Hasholt, M. and Jensen, O., Mat. Struct. 48 (1-2), 357–368 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, O. M., Concrete International 35 (1), 48–52 (2013).Google Scholar
Snoeck, D., Van Tittelboom, K., Steuperaert, S., Dubruel, P. and De Belie, N., Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures 25 (1), 13–24 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mignon, A., Graulus, G.-J., Snoeck, D., Martins, J., De Belie, N., Dubruel, P. and Van Vlierberghe, S., J Mater Sci 50 (2), 970–979 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasholt, M. T., Jensen, O. M., Kovler, K. and Zhutovsky, S., Construction and Building Materials 31, 226–230 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snoeck, D., Schaubroeck, D., Dubruel, P. and De Belie, N., Constr. Build. Mater. 72, 148–157 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sriamornsak, P. and Kennedy, R. A., International Journal of Pharmaceutics 358 (1–2), 205–213 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takka, F., Acarturk, S., Journal of Microencapsulation 16 (3), 291–301 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar