Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-lvwk9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-26T05:38:26.129Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Remarks by Catherine Kessedjian

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Catherine Kessedjian
Catherine Kessedjian*
Affiliation:
Université de Paris II
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Restating the U.S. Law of International Commercial Arbitration
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 102 , 2008 , pp. 171 - 173
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The dissertation was prepared for the University of Paris, in French, on the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in the United States and it was published in 1987 by Economica in Paris.

2 Kessedjian, Catherine, Le Restatement of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States - UN nouveau Traité de Droit international?, 117(1) J. Du Droit Int’l 35 (1990)Google Scholar.

3 In fact, it was a Swiss Professor, Pierre Lalive, who came up with the concept. The French legislation on arbitration does not use the concept even though it does organise the cooperation of the judge with the arbitration process. See Fouchard, Ph., >La coopération du Président du Tribunal de Grande instance à l’arbitrage, Rev. Arb. 50 (1985)Google Scholar. The draft reform of French arbitration rules proposed by the Comité français de l’arbitrage uses the concept in its Article 1460. See Rev. Arb. 491 (2006). I wish we had an equivalent in the English language. I have tried to translate it into “support judge”, but it does not sound quite right.