Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T21:13:50.181Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inventing a Prosthetic Bourgeoisie: Romania and the Aromanians, 1848–1906

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2021

Andrei Dan Sorescu Open the ORCID record for Andrei Dan Sorescu [Opens in a new window]
Andrei Dan Sorescu*
Affiliation:
Research Institute of the University of Bucharest, Romania
*
*Corresponding author. Email: andreidansorescu@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present article focuses on the period between 1848 and 1906—between the politicized “discovery” of Balkan Aromanians as a kinfolk by Romanian nation-state builders and the aftermath of the community’s recognition by the Ottoman government. Examining how Romania imagined its own entanglement in the Macedonian Question, the article aims to raise the broader question of how a nation-state imagined the agency of kinfolk beyond its borders and, as part of a geographically distributed national division of labor, ascribed a specific task to one part of its ethnic body. In Romania’s case, this had a double thrust. One, Aromanians were imagined as the natural bourgeoisie of the southern Balkans, a people superior in their origins, culture, and mores to other ethnic groups—and a natural vanguard for Romania’s economic interests in the region. Two, they were imagined as a vanguard for catalyzing the internal development of a native merchant class in Romania proper, which was understood as a primary agent for economic and social progress but perceived to be problematically absent. Thus, this study hones in on the process of ascribing the status of a “prosthetic bourgeoisie” to the Aromanians, and its insistent discursive recurrence.

Keywords

nationalismRomaniaAromaniansMacedonian Question
Type
Article
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 50 , Issue 4 , July 2022 , pp. 661 - 683
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Association for the Study of Nationalities

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agelopoulos, Giorgos. 1995. “Perceptions, Construction and Definition of Greek National Identity in Late Nineteenth, Early Twentieth Century Macedonia.” In Balkan Studies 36 (2): 247–263.Google Scholar
Anon. 1875. “Școlile macedonene.” Albina Pindului 4.Google Scholar
Anon. 1875. Albina Pindului 4.Google Scholar
Anon. 1880. “Memoratum petrecutu de Romanili din Turchia cătră congresul de la Berlin.” Frățilia întru dreptate 16–17.Google Scholar
Anon. 1893–1894. “Împământenirile.” Peninsula Balcanică 50.Google Scholar
Anon. 1893–1894. “Recunoașterile.” Peninsula Balcanică 2.Google Scholar
Anon. 1893–1894. “Situația românilor macedoneni.” Peninsula Balcanică 5.Google Scholar
Anon. 1897. Episcopatul românilor macedoneni: Studiu apărut în “Voința Națională”, decembre 1896. Bucharest: Tipografia Voința Națională.Google Scholar
Anon . 1906. “Apel către cetățenii giurgiuveni.” Apărarea neamului românesc 1.Google Scholar
Anon. 1906. “Emigrarea grecilor în America față cu imigrarea în țara noastră.” Aromânul 3.Google Scholar
Anon. 1906. “Eri! Și azi!” Liga anti-grecească 3.Google Scholar
Anon . 1906. “Marele miting anti-grecesc din Giurgiu.” Liga anti-grecească 1.Google Scholar
Anon. 1906. “Noile expulzări.” Apărarea neamului românesc 9.Google Scholar
Anon. 1906. “Rolul macedonenilor in România.” Românul de la Pind, March 5, 1906.Google Scholar
Anon. 1906. Apărarea neamului românesc 1.Google Scholar
Anon. 1906. Apărarea neamului românesc 23.Google Scholar
Anon. 1907. “Recunoașterile macedonenilor.” Românul de la Pind, January 29, 1907.Google Scholar
Anon. 1910. Cereri de recunoaşteri şi împământeniri după ordinea cronologică până la 1 Ianuarie 1910 cercetate de comisiunea de indigenat. Bucharest: Imprimeria Stalului.Google Scholar
Anon. 1997. “Memorandum prezentat de către delegaţii vlahi din Macedonia, Epir şi Tesalia Ambasadorilor la Constantinopol”In Românii de la sud de Dunăre. Documente, edited by Brezeanu, Ștefan, Zbuchea, Gheorghe, and Adamache, Adrian, 166–167. Bucharest: Arhivele Naționale ale României.Google Scholar
Anon. 1997. “Proclamația comitetului Macedo-Român pentru Albania, Epir, Tesalia și Macedonia (1863).” In Românii de la sud de Dunăre: Documente, edited by Brezeanu, Ștefan, Zbuchea, Gheorghe, and Adamache, Adrian, 153–154. Bucharest: Arhivele Naționale ale României.Google Scholar
Anon. 1906. Apărarea neamului românesc 12.Google Scholar
Arslan, Ali. 2004. “The Vlach Issue During the Late Ottoman Period and the Emergence of the Vlach Community (Millet).” Études balkaniques 40 (4): 121–139.Google Scholar
Bălcescu, Nicolae. 1990. Nicolae Bălcescu to Ion Ghica, 26 October 1849. In Nicolae Bălcescu, Opere, edited by Zane, George and Zane, Elena. Vol. 4, 174. Bucharest: Editura Academiei Române.Google Scholar
Batzaria, Nicoale. 1904. “Importanța elementului aromân.” Lumina 2.Google Scholar
Batzaria, Nicoale. 1904. “Menirea elementului aromân.” Lumina 3.Google Scholar
Batzaria, Nicolae. 1904. “Agricultura la aromâni.” Lumina 6.Google Scholar
Belemace, Constantin. 1904. “De ce nu sunt aromânii agricultori.” Lumina 4.Google Scholar
Berciu-Drăghicescu, Adina, and Petre, Maria, eds. Şcoli şi biserici româneşti din Peninsula Balcanică. Documente (1864–1948). Bucharest: Editura Universității din București, 2004.Google Scholar
Berciu-Drăghicescu, Adina. 1996. Românii din Balcani: cultura si spiritualitate: sfârsitul secolului al XIX-lea - începutul secolului al XX-lea. Bucharest: Editura Globus.Google Scholar
Bolintineanu, Dimitrie. 1985 [1863]. “Călătorii la românii din Macedonia şi Muntele Athos sau Santa-Agora.” In Opere, vol. 6, edited by Vârgolici, Teodor, 288–405. Bucharest: Minerva.Google Scholar
Bouchard, Jacques. 2014. “Perception des Phanariotes avant et après Zallony.” Cahiers balkaniques 42.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. 1995. “National Minorities, Nationalizing States, and External National Homelands in the New Europe.” Daedalus 124 (2): 107–132.Google Scholar
Burada, T. T. 1890. Cercetări despre școalele românești din Turcia. Bucharest: Tipografia “Românulu”.Google Scholar
Burileanu, Constantin N. 1906. Dela Românii din Albania. Bucharest: Lito-Tip. L. Motzătzeanu.Google Scholar
Cain, Daniel. 2012. Diplomați și diplomație în sud-estul european: Relațiile româno-bulgare la 1900. Bucharest: Editura Academiei Române.Google Scholar
Cain, Daniel. 2017. “Entre politique et éducation: Le réseau consulaire du Vieux Royaume de Roumanie dans l’Empire ottoman (1881–1913).” Études Balkaniques - Cahiers Pierre Belon 22 (1): 159–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carageani, Gheorghe. 1999. Studii aromâne. Bucharest: Editura Fundației Culturale Române.Google Scholar
Cazacu, Matei. 1989. “Les Valaques dans les Balkans occidentaux (Serbie, Croatie, Albanie, etc.): La pax ottomanica (XVe–XVIIe siècles).” Cahiers du Centre d’étude des civilisations de l’Europe centrale et du Sud-Est 8 :79–93.Google Scholar
Chiper, Mihai. 2014. “Olteni contra evrei la Iaşi. Lecţia unei colonizări economice eşuate (1882–1884).” Anuarul Institutului de Istorie “A. D. Xenopol” 51 :157–181.Google Scholar
Ciupală, Alin. 1996. “Începuturile școlii românești în Macedonia, Epir și Tesalia.” Erasmus 6:28–39.Google Scholar
Colescu, Leonida. 1905. Recensământul general al populaţiunei României: Rezultate definitive precedate de o introducţiune cu explicaţiuni şi date comparative. Bucharest: Inst. de Arte Grafice Eminescu.Google Scholar
Cordescu, Mihail-Virgiliu. 1906. Istoricul şcoalelor române din Turcia, Sofia şi Turtucaia din Bulgaria şi al seminariilor de limba română din Lipsca, Viena şi Berlin, 1866–1906. Bucharest: Tip. Curţii Regale, F. Göbl Fii.Google Scholar
Cosmescu, C. I. 1902. Scoala veclie ica dascallu sbuta. Bucharest: Dor P. Cucu.Google Scholar
Cosmulei, Demetrie. 1891. Memoriu despre starea șcólelor românesci din Macedonia. Bucharest: Dor. P. Cucu.Google Scholar
Creţulescu, Vladimir. 2015. “The Aromanian-Romanian National Movement (1859–1905): An Analytical Model.” Balcanica Posnaniensia: Acta et studia 22 (1): 99–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidova, Evguenia. 2012. “‘Graecomans’ into Bulgarians: Shifting Perceptions of Greek-Bulgarian Interethnic Marriages in the Nineteenth Century.” Balkanologie 14 (1–2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Morangiés, . 1841. “Les Roumounis de l’Ano-Valachie.” Spicuitorul/Le Glaneur Moldo-Valaque, July–September, 1–16.Google Scholar
Densușianu, Nicolae, and Damé, Frédéric. 1877. L’élement latin en Orient: Les roumains du sud; Macédonie, Thessalie, Epire, Thrace, Albanie. Paris: Manginot-Helitasse ; Bucharest: Jos. Szőllosy.Google Scholar
Detrez, Raymond. 2013. “The Fanariote Myth in Bulgarian Historiography.” In Myths of the Other in the Balkans: Representations, Social Practices, Performances, edited by Tsibiridou, Fotini and Palantzas, Nikitas, 40–56. Thessaloniki: www.balkanmyth.com.Google Scholar
Dinu, Rudolf. 2014. Diplomația Vechiului Regat, 1878–1914. Bucharest: Monitorul Oficial; Bucharest: Presa Universitară Clujeană.Google Scholar
Dragostinova, Theodora. 2008. “Speaking National: Nationalizing the Greeks of Bulgaria, 1900–1939.” Slavic Review 67 (1): 154–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dundar, Fuat. 2015. “Empire of Taxonomy: Ethnic and Religious Identities in the Ottoman Surveys and Censuses.” Middle Eastern Studies 51 (1): 136–158 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erdem, Hakan. 2004. “‘Do Not Think of the Greeks as Agricultural Laborers’: Ottoman Responses to the Greek War of Independence.” In Citizenship and the Nation-State in Greece and Turkey, edited by Birtek, Faruk and Dragonas, Thalia, 67–85. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Folschweiller, Cécile. 2014. “Les clichés anti-grecs chez les penseurs roumains de la seconde moitié du xixe siècle.” Cahiers balkaniques 42.Google Scholar
Gounaris, Basil C. 1995. “Social Cleavages and National ‘Awakening’ in Ottoman Macedonia.” East European Quarterly 29 (4): 409–426.Google Scholar
Gounaris, Basil C. 2009. “Model Nation and Caricature State: Competing Greek Perspectives on the Balkans and Hellas (1797–1896).” In The Making of Modern Greece: Nationalism, Romanticism, and the Uses of the Past (1797–1896), edited by Beaton, Roderick and Ricks, David, 137–151. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Hanley, Will. 2016. “What Ottoman Nationality Was and Was Not.” Journal of the Ottoman and Turkish Studies Association 3 (2): 277–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herzfeld, Michael. 1982. Ours Once More: Folklore, Ideology, and the Making of Modern Greece. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Hiemstra, Paul A. 1987. Alexandru D. Xenopol and the Development of Romanian Historiography. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Ionescu, Take. 1897. Macedonia. Bucharest: Tip. Epoca.Google Scholar
Iordachi, Constantin. 2017. “Diplomacy and the Making of a Geopolitical Question: The Romanian-Bulgarian Conflict over Dobrudja, 1878–1947.” In Concepts, Approaches, and (Self-)Representations, vol. 4 of Entangled Histories of the Balkans, edited by Daskalov, Roumen, Mishkova, Diana, Marinov, Tchavdar, and Vezenkov, Alexander, 291–394. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Iordachi, Constantin, 2019. Liberalism , Constitutional Nationalism, and Minorities: The Making of Romanian Citizenship, c. 1750–1918. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahan, Alan S. 2003. Liberalism in Nineteenth Century Europe: The Political Culture of Limited Suffrage. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karakasidou, Anastasia N. 1997. Fields of Wheat, Hills of Blood: Passages to Nationhood in Greek Macedonia, 1870–1990. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellogg, Frederick. 1990. A History of Romanian Historical Writing. Bakersfield, CA: Charles Schlacks.Google Scholar
Kılınçoğlu, Deniz T. 2015. Economics and Capitalism in the Ottoman Empire. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kocka, Jürgen. 1995. “The Middle Classes in Europe.” The Journal of Modern History 67 (4): 783–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koliopoulos, John S., and Veremis, Thanos. 2002. Greece: The Modern Sequel From 1831 to the Present. London: Hurst and Co.Google Scholar
Kontogeorgis, Dimitris, 2013. “Between Party Politics and Social Pressure: The Anti-Greek Movement in Romania (1905–1906).” In Social Transformation and Mass Mobilization in the Balkan and Eastern Mediterranean Cities (1900–1923), edited by Lyberatos, Andreas K., 161–175. Heraklion: Crete University Press.Google Scholar
Koulouri, Christina. 1991. Dimensions idéologiques de l’historicité en Grèce (1834–1914). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Lambru, Rizu. [1879?]. O opinie asupra darei drepturilor politice şi pământeneşti Israeliţilor din Orient (România). Bucharest: Noua Tip. a Laboratorilor Români.Google Scholar
Lapavitsas, Costas, and Cakiroglu, Pinar. 2019. Capitalism in the Ottoman Balkans: Industrialization and Modernity in Macedonia. London: Bloomsbury.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leake, William Martin. 1814. Researches in Greece. London: J. Booth.Google Scholar
Leake, William Martin. 1835. Travels in Northern Greece. Vol. 1. London: J Rodwell.Google Scholar
Lemny, Ștefan. 1985. “La critique du regime phanariote: clichés mentaux et perspectives historiographiques.” In Culture and Society: Structures, Interferences, Analogies in the Modern Romanian History, edited by Zub, Alexandru, 17–30. Iași: Editura Academiei R.S.R.Google Scholar
Leonte, A., Mis[s]ail, G., and Puppa, I. C.. 1904. 25 ani de luptă în cestiunea macedoneană. Galați: Tipo-Litografia “Moldova.”Google Scholar
Lory, Bernard. 2011. “Schools for the Destruction of Society: School Propaganda in Bitola, 1860–1912.” In Conflicting Loyalties in the Balkans: The Great Powers, the Ottoman Empire and Nation-Building, edited by Grandits, Hannes, Clayer, Nathalie, and Pichler, Robert, 46–63. London: I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar
Lyberatos, Andreas Kosmas. 2016. “The Nation in the Balkan Village: National Politicization in Mid-Nineteenth-Century Ottoman Thrace.” Turkish Historical Review 7 (2): 167–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mestyan, Adam. 2019. “The Muslim Bourgeoisie and Philanthropy in the Late Ottoman Empire.” In The Global Bourgeoisie: The Rise of the Middle Classes in the Age of Empire, edited by Dejung, Christof, Motadel, David, and Osterhammel, Jürgen, 207–228. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Missail, G. 1905. “Perit-au fanarioții?” Revista Macedoniei 5.Google Scholar
Murgescu, Bogdan. 2010. România și Europa: Acumularea decalajelor economice (1500–2010). Iași: Polirom.Google Scholar
Neagu, Doru. 2014. “Societatea de Cultură Macedo-Română, 1879–1948.” PhD diss., Universitatea Valahia.Google Scholar
Nistor, Ionuț. 2009. “Problema aromână” în raporturile României cu statele balcanice (1903–1913). Iași: Editura Universității Alexandru Ioan Cuza.Google Scholar
Obédénare [Obedenaru], M.-G. 1876. La Roumanie économique d’après les données les plus récentes: Géographie, état économique, anthropologie. Paris: Ernest Leroux.Google Scholar
Öncel, Fatma. 2020. “Transhumants and Rural Change in Northern Greece Throughout the Nineteenth Century.” International Review of Social History. Published online ahead of print July 1, 2020. doi:10.1017/S0020859020000371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papacostea, V. 1929. “Însemnările lui Ioan Șomu-Tomescu cu privire la Arhimandritul Averchie.” Revista Aromânească 1: 38–55.Google Scholar
Papacostea-Danielopolu, Cornelia. 1996. Comunitățile grecești din România în secolul al XIX-lea. Bucharest: Editura Omonia.Google Scholar
Papadakis, Lydia. 2006. Teaching the Nation: Greek Nationalism and Education in Nineteenth Century Macedonia. Thessaloniki: Institute for Balkan Studies.Google Scholar
Petmezas, Socrates D. 2009. “From Privileged Outcasts to Power Players: The ‘Romantic’ Redefinition of the Hellenic Nation in the Mid-Nineteenth Century.” In The Making of Modern Greece: Nationalism, Romanticism, and the Uses of the Past (1797–1896), edited by Beaton, Roderick and Ricks, David, 137–151. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Petrescu, Ştefan. 2007a. “Cetăţenie şi naţionalitate în Vechiul Regat: Studiu de caz – grecii.” In Ipostaze ale modernizării în Vechiul Regat, edited by Bulei, Ion and Ciupală, Alin, 220–241. Vol. 5. Bucharest: Editura Universității din București.Google Scholar
Petrescu, Ștefan. 2007b. “Secularizarea averilor mănăstireşti în lumina rapoartelor diplomatice greceşti (1860–1880).” Revista Institutului Diplomatic Român 2 (2): 420–434.Google Scholar
Peyfuss, Max Demeter. 1994. Chestiunea aromânească: Evoluția ei de la origini până la pacea de la București (1913) și poziția Austro-Ungariei. Bucharest: Editura Enciclopedică.Google Scholar
Philliou, Christine. 2011. Biography of an Empire: Governing Ottomans in an Age of Revolution. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Pippidi, Andrei. 2010. “The Development of an Administrative Class in South-East Europe.” In Ottomans into Europeans, edited by Mungiu-Pippidi, Alina and Van Meurs, Wim, 111–134. London: Hurst and Co.Google Scholar
Pouqueville, F. C. H. L. 1826. Voyage de la Gréce. Vol. 2. Paris: Firmin Didot.Google Scholar
Rachieru, Silvana. 2018. Diplomați și supuși otomani în Vechiul Regat: Relaţii otomano-române între anii 1878 și 1908. Iași: Editura Universității Alexandru Ioan Cuza.Google Scholar
Rados, Leonidas. 2002–2003. “Fanariotism şi antifanariotism în istoriografia română paşoptistă.” Anuarul Institutului de Istorie “A.D. Xenopol” 39–40: 293–310.Google Scholar
Rados, Leonidas. 2008. “Influenţa greacă în disputele istoriografice din spaţiul românesc în a doua jumătate a secolului XIX.” Anuarul Institutului de Istorie “George Bariţiu” 67:123–142.Google Scholar
Roudometof, Victor. 2000. “The Social Origins of Balkan Politics: Nationalism, Underdevelopment, and the Nation-State in Greece, Serbia, and Bulgaria, 1880–1920.” Mediterranean Quarterly 11 (3): 144–163 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seirinidou, Vasiliki. 2008. “The ‘Old’ Diaspora, the ‘New’ Diaspora, and the Greek Diaspora.” In Homelands and Diasporas: Greeks, Jews and their Migrations, edited by Rozen, Minna, 155–159. London: I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar
Sorescu, Andrei Dan. 2017. “‘Funcționarism’: La rhétorique de la corruption morale et institutionnelle au XIXe siècle en Roumanie.” In Moralité du pouvoir et corruption en France et en Roumanie XVIIIe–XXe siècle, edited by Marton, Silvia, Monier, Frédéric, and Dard, Olivier, 83–97. Paris: Presses Universitaires de la Sorbonne.Google Scholar
Sorescu, Andrei Dan. 2018. “National History as a History of Compacts: Jus Publicum Europaeum and Suzerainty in Romania in the Mid-Nineteenth Century.” East Central Europe 45 (1): 63–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoianovich, Traian. 1960. “The Conquering Balkan Orthodox Merchant.” Journal of Economic History 20 (2): 234–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoicescu, Virgiliu, Naum, Const. I., and Petrescu-Birina, Const.. 1900. Românii din Macedonia (Anii 270–1901). Bucharest: Tip. “Viitorul” Nicolae N. Voicu.Google Scholar
Tanașoca, Anca, and Tanașoca, Nicolae-Șerban. 2004. Unitate romanică și diversitate balcanică: Contributii la istoria romanității balcanice. Bucharest: Editura Fundației PRO.Google Scholar
Tanaşoca, Nicolae Şerban, and Vâlcu, Ştefan, eds. 2012. Documentele redeşteptării macedoromânilor. Bucharest: Predania.Google Scholar
Tipei, Alex R. 2018. “How to Make Friends and Influence People: Elementary Education, French ‘Influence’, and the Balkans, 1815–1830s.” Modern Intellectual History 15 (3): 621–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trifon, Nicolas. 2012. Aromânii: Pretutindeni, nicăieri. Bucharest: Cartier.Google Scholar
Tzanelli, Rodanthi. 2008. Nation-Building and Identity in Europe: The Dialogics of Reciprocity. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vâlcu, Ștefan. 2002. “Acțiunea statului român în Balcani (II): Anul 1905, un an de referință.” Études roumaines et aroumaines 7: 77–118.Google Scholar
Volarić, Klara. 2014. “Between the Ottoman and Serbian States: ‘Carigradski Glasnik’, an Istanbul-Based Paper of Ottoman Serbs, 1895–1909.” Hungarian Historical Review 3 (3): 560–586.Google Scholar
Von Puttkamer, Joachim. 2017. “The Vlachs of Krushevo: Nationalism and Violence in the Ilinden Uprising.” Südost-Forschungen 76 (1): 217–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weigand, Gustav. 1894. Die Aromunen: Ethnographisch-philologisch-historische Antersuchungen über das Volk der Sogenannten Makedo-Romanen oder Zinzaren. Vol. 2. Leipzig: Johann Ambrosius Barth (Arthur Meiner).Google Scholar
Xenopol, A. D. 1888. Istoria veche: Din vremile cele mai vechi până la întemeierea ţărilor române. Vol. 1 of Istoria românilor din Dacia Traiană. Iași: Tipo Litografia H. Goldner.Google Scholar
Xhufi, Pëllumb. 2012. “Les débuts de Voskopoja.” Studia Albanica 49 (1): 9–48.Google Scholar
Yosmaoğlu, İpek K. 2006. “Counting Bodies, Shaping Souls: The 1903 Census and National Identity in Ottoman Macedonia.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 38 (1): 55–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuca, G. Z. 1906. “Păstoritul și agricultura la românii din Pind.” Lumina 3.Google Scholar
Zuca, G. Z. 1906. “Studii economice asupra românilor din Pind.” Lumina 10.Google Scholar