Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T10:37:30.664Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of plane of nutrition, genotype and sex on growth, body composition and wool production in grazing sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. C. Kellaway
R. C. Kellaway
Affiliation:
Waite Agricultural Research Institute, University of Adelaide, Glen Osmond, S.A. 5064
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Growth rates, chemical composition of the body and wool production were measured with wethers and ewes from two genotypes of sheep grazing at two planes of nutrition. The nutritional treatments were applied after weaning at 12 kg live weight. Animals were slaughtered at 6 kg intervals between 12 and 54 kg live weight.

Dorset Horn × (Border Leicester × Merino) lambs grew 57% faster than South Australian Merino lambs before weaning, produced 22% more wool and contained more fat at weaning.

Post-weaning growth rates on the high and low planes of nutrition were 168 and 78g/day for Merinos and 183 and 116 g/day for Cross-breds. Despite these differences, there was virtually no effect on body composition. Sheep which were starved and re-grown also had a similar body composition to sheep grown continuously.

There was, however, a nutritional effect on wool production. On the high plane of nutrition the rate of wool production was 22% higher than on the low plane of nutrition.

After weaning there were only small differences in the growth rate of the two genotypes but the Merinos grew 30% more wool than Cross-breds on the high plane of nutrition and 39% more wool on the low plane of nutrition. Genotype differences in the fat and protein content of the empty body were small, but Merinos contained more ash, Ca, P and Mg.

After weaning the normal pattern of allometric growth was reversed; at 18 kg live weight the sheep contained a lower proportion of fat and higher proportion of water than at 12 kg live weight. Above 18 kg live weight normal allometric growth was resumed. The fat-free empty body became progressively less hydrated but the ratio of protein: ash remained constant at 79:21 for Merinos and 81:19 for Cross-breds.

There was a trend towards ewes being fatter than wethers, but this was only significant with Merinos. Other sex differences in body composition, body growth and wool growth were not significant.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 80 , Issue 1 , February 1973 , pp. 17 - 27
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allden, W. G. (1968 a). Undernutrition of the Merino sheep and its sequelae. I. The growth and development of lambs following prolonged periods of nutritional stress. Aust. J. agric. Res. 19, 621–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allden, W. G. (1968 b). Undernutrition of the Merino sheep and its sequelae. II. The influence of finite periods of arrested growth on the subsequent wool growth, fleece development, and utilization of feed for wool production of lambs. Aust. J. agric. Res. 19, 639–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allden, W. G. (1968 C). Undernutrition of the Merino sheep and its sequelae. III. The effect on lifetime productivity of growth restrictions imposed at two stages of early post-natal life in a Mediterranean environment. Aust. J. agric. Res. 19, 981–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allden, W. G. (1968 d). Undernutrition of the Merino sheep and its sequelae. IV. Herbage consumption and utilization of feed for wool production following growth restrictions imposed at two states of early post-natal life in a Mediterranean environment. Aust. J. agric. Res. 19, 997–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allden, W. G. (1970 a). The body composition and herbage utilization of grazing Merino and Crossbred lambs during periods of growth and summer undernutrition. Aust. J. agric. Res. 21, 261–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allden, W. G. (1970 b). The effects of nutritional deprivation on the subsequent productivity of sheep and cattle. Nutr. Abstr. Rev. 40, 1167–84.Google ScholarPubMed
Andrews, R. P. & Ørskov, E. R. (1970). The nutrition of the early weaned lamb. II. The effect of dietary protein concentration, feeding level and sex on body composition at two live weights. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 75, 19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, G. W., Gharaybeh, H. R., Dudzinski, M. L., McManus, W. R. & Axelsen, A. (1969). Body composition of young sheep. II. Effect of stocking rate on body composition of Dorset Horn cross lambs. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 72, 77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Association of Official Agricultural Chemists (1955). Official Methods of Analysis, 8th ed.Washington: Association of Official Agricultural Chemists.Google Scholar
Barnicoat, C. R. (1952). Milk production of the ewe. Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 12, 115–20.Google Scholar
Burton, J. H. & Reid, J. T. (1969). Inter-relationships among energy input, body size, age and body composition of sheep. J. Nutr. 97, 517–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butterfield, R. M. (1966). The effect of nutritional stress and recovery on the body composition of cattle. Res. vet. Sci. 7, 168–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, H. L. (1963). The milk production of Merino ewes at pasture. Aust. J. agric. Res. 14, 824–38.Google Scholar
Davies, H. L. & Humphries, A. W. (1965). Stocking rate and wool production at Kojonup. J. Agric. West Aust. 6, 409–13.Google Scholar
Duncan, D. B. (1955). Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics 11, 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunlop, A. A. (1962). Interactions between heredity and environment in the Australian Merino. I. Strain × location in wool traits. Aust. J. agric. Res. 13, 503–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Everitt, G. C. & Jury, K. E. (1966 a). Effects of sex and gonadectomy on the growth and development of Southdown × Romney Cross lambs. Part I. Effects on live-weight growth and components of live weight. J. agric Sci., Camb. 66, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Everitt, G. C. & Jury, K. E. (1966 b). Effects of sex and gonadectomy on the growth and development of Southdown × Romney Cross lambs. Part II. Effects on carcass grades, measurements and chemical composition. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 66, 15–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, W. N., Meyer, J. H. & Lofgreen, G. P. (1959). The comparative energy requirements of sheep and cattle for maintenance and gain. J. Anim. Sci. 18, 528–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huxley, J. (1932). Problems of Relative Growth. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Keenan, D. M., McManus, W. R. & Freer, M. (1969). Changes in the body composition and efficiency of mature sheep during loss and regain of live weight. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 72, 139–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lofgreen, C. P. (1969). Effects of nutrition on carcass characteristics. Feedstuffs 41, 44–6.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. H. & Clawson, W. J. (1964). Undernutrition and subsequent realimentation in rats and sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 23, 214–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, B. W., Jagusch, K. T. & Walker, D. M. (1970). Body composition studies with the milk-fed lamb. III. The effect of the protein and energy intake on the composition of the live-weight gain. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 75, 287–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palsson, H. & Verges, J. B. (1952). Effects of plane of nutrition on growth and development of carcass quality in lambs. Part II. Effects on lambs of 30 lb. carcass weight. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 42, 93–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panaretto, B. A. & Till, A. R. (1963). Body composition in vivo.II. The composition of mature goats and its relationship to the antipyrine, tritiated water and N-acetyl-4-aminoantipyrine spaces. Aust. J. agric. Res. 14, 926–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, J. T., Bensadoun, A., Bull, L. S., Burton, J. H., Gleeson, P. A., Han, I. K., Joo, Y. D., Johnson, D. E., McManus, W. R., Paladines, O. L., Stroud, J. W., Tyrrell, H. F., Van Niekerk, B. D. H. & Wellington, G. W. (1968). Some peculiarities in the body composition of animals. In Body Composition in Animals and Man. Ed. by Reid, J. T.. Nat'l Acad. Sci. Publ. No. 1598.Google Scholar
Seebeck, R. M. (1966). Composition of dressed carcases of lambs. Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 6, 291–7.Google Scholar
Steel, R. G. D. & Torrie, J. H. (1960). Principles and Procedures of Statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co. Inc.Google Scholar
Tribe, D. E. & Coles, G. J. R. (1966). Primb Lamb Production. Melbourne: F. W. Cheshire.Google Scholar
Tulloh, N. M. (1964). The carcase compositions of sheep, cattle and pigs as functions of body weight. In Symposium on Carcase Composition and Appraisal of Meat Animals Tech. Conf. Melbourne, 1963. Ed. by Tribe, D. E..Google Scholar
Young, S. S. Y. & Chapman, R. E. (1957). A system for assessing the clean scoured yield of Australian greasy wool. J. Aust. Inst. agric. Sci. 23, 63–8.Google Scholar