Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T08:46:26.141Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Women's Issues: An Agenda for the Church?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2014

Mary Ann Donovan*
Affiliation:
Jesuit School of Theology Graduate Theological Union, Berkeley

Abstract

What does church membership mean for women? Texts like Galatians 3:27-28 imply equality; experience contradicts this. Underlying the controversy are assumptions about women's nature as women. Baptismal practice suggests women's equality but experience denies it. Part I examines experience: in lay ministry, in marriage, and as economically marginalized. Turning from experience to theoretical analysis, there are two answers to the question of women's nature: women are inferior, or women are equal. Part II studies the two models at work in the dialogue held between representatives of the Women's Ordination Conference and the U.S. National Conference of Catholic Bishops as participants addressed the question: “What is woman?” Finally the two models are operative in the testimony given in the national hearings for the bishops' pastoral on women. Part III analyzes the reports of the national hearings, uncovering the correlation between model, methodology, and whether a group's feminism leads it to social or issue critique.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The College Theology Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 This essay was prepared for presentation to the Moral Theology Seminar of the Catholic Theological Society of America, June 12, 1986; it is part of a larger ongoing project.

2 I maintain that such equality is an underlying theme of the New Testament, and not simply an issue addressed by isolated texts. Space forbids a review of all the scriptural passages and related literature. The key recent work is Fiorenza, Elizabeth Schüssler, In Memory of Her: A Feminist Reconstruction of Christian Origins (New York: Crossroad, 1983).Google Scholar

3 The effects of baptism are spelled out in the anointing formula: “God, the Father of Our Lord Jesus Christ, has freed you from all sin, given you a new birth by water and the Holy Spirit, and welcomed you into his holy people. He now anoints you with the chrism of salvation. As Christ was anointed priest, prophet, and king so may you live always as a member of his body sharing everlasting life.”

4 The goal of the Dialogue was to discover, understand and promote the full potential of woman as person in the life of the Church” (Origins 11 [1981], 83).Google Scholar For reports, see Dialogue on Women in the Church: Interim Report,” Origins 11 (1981), 8191;Google Scholar and Report on a Dialogue: The Future of Women in the Church,” Origins 12 (1982), 19.Google Scholar

5 See Origins 12 (1982), 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 Hoffman, Lawrence A. uses the “higher-lower” criticism distinction this way in “Blessings and Their Translation in Current Jewish Liturgies,” Worship 60 (1986), 140.Google Scholar

7 See Lumen Gentium, nn. 39-42.

8 See Kemper, Vicki, “Poor and Getting Poorer,” Sojourners 13 (March, 1986), 1518.Google Scholar

9 Ibid.; study by the National Advisory Council on Economic Opportunity cited p. 15.

10 Selected from a longer list quoted in ibid., p. 17.

11 See Fialka, John F., “Sisters in Need,” The Wall Street Journal, May 19,1986, pp. 1,12.Google Scholar

12 Carr, Anne, “Theological Anthropology and the Experience of Women,” Chicago Studies 19 (1980), 113–28.Google Scholar In developing the three options, Carr draws on O'Neill, Aquin, “Toward a Renewed Anthropology,” Theological Studies 36 (1975), 725–36;CrossRefGoogle Scholar the 1978 Research Report of the Catholic Theological Society of America; and Buckley, Mary, “The Meaning of the Human,” CTSA Proceedings 34 (1979), 4863.Google Scholar

13 See Changing Roles of Women and Men,” Origins 23 (1980), 299301.Google Scholar

14 Ibid., 301.

15 Origins 12 (1982), 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

16 Ibid. In reflecting on this essay, George Tavard suggested “supplementarity” for “complementarity.”

17 The 1978 CTSA Research Report, quoted in Carr, p. 123.

18 Origins 12 (1982), 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

19 See above, n. 10.

20 See Carr, pp. 122-23.

21 Report,” Origins 12 (1982), 8.Google Scholar

22 These were the Leadership Conference of Women Religious (LCWR), the Catholic Daughters of America (CDA), the Women's Ordination Conference (WOC), the National Council of Catholic Women (NCCW), and the Committee on Laity of the U.S. Bishops (CL), all reported in Origins 14 (1985); National Marriage Encounter (NME), Women for Faith and Family (WFF), the North American Conference of Separated and Divorced Catholics (SDC), the Association of Contemplative Sisters (ACS), and the Consortium Perfectae Caritatis (CPC), all reported in Origins 15 (1985), 253.

23 Catholic Daughters of America, National Council of Catholic Women, Women for Faith and Family, and Consortium Perfectae Caritatis.

24 Origins 14 (1985), 657.Google Scholar

25 Ibid.

26 Ibid.

27 Origins 15 (1985), 253.Google Scholar

28 Origins 14 (1985), 662.Google Scholar

29 Origins 14 (1985), 661.Google Scholar

30 Origins 15 (1985), 246.Google Scholar

31 Ibid.

32 Ibid., p. 247.

33 Ibid., p. 248.

34 Origins 14 (1985), 654.Google Scholar

35 Ibid., p. 655.

36 Ibid., p. 653. The best recent study is that of the Conference of Major Superiors of Men, CMSM Documentation #37, April 8, 1983.

37 Pastoral on Women Hearings,” Origins 15 (1985), 245.Google Scholar

38 Ibid., p. 249.

39 Origins 15 (1985), 66.Google Scholar

40 Murray, John Courtney, “The Problem of Religious Freedom,” Theological Studies 25 (1964), 503–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

41 See Gaudium et Spes, nn. 1-10 for the methodological steps; the phrase “bringing up to date” occurs in John XXIII's Opening Speech, Abbott, p. 712.

42 Whether this town is in fact the Emmaus of the New Testament is simply not known.