No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Pluralism and Dialectic: On James's Relation to Hegel
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 September 2015
Abstract
In this paper James's pluralism is examined in light of his critiques of ‘intellectualism’ and monistic idealism in order to elucidate his relationship to Hegel. Contrary to the strong anti-Hegelianism found throughout the writings of James, Hegel's dialectic and speculative logic are able to give a rational account of the continuity of objects and relations within experience that James struggled to articulate in A Pluralistic Universe. Neither James nor Hegel is an absolute pluralist or monist due to the interdependence of the concepts of unity and plurality, aptly described by Hegel in his Logic, and alluded to by James in various places throughout his work. Thus, the ambiguity of the nature of James's pluralism previously noted by scholars is explained, and the relevance of Hegel and dialectic for pragmatist theory is elucidated.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2015
References
Brandom, R. B. (2002), Tales of the Mighty Dead: Historical Essays in the Metaphysics of Intentionality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bernstein, R. J. (1971), Praxis and Action: Contemporary Philosophies of Human Activity. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Cook, D. J. (1977), ‘James's “Ether Mysticism” and Hegel’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 15(3), 309-3319.Google Scholar
Deen, P. (2010), ‘Dialectical vs. Experimental Method: Marcuse's Review of Dewey's Logic: The Theory of Inquiry’, Transactions of the C. S. Peirce Society 46(2), 242-257.Google Scholar
Dulckeit, K. (1998), ‘Can Hegel Refer to Particulars?’, The Phenomenology of Spirit Reader: Critical and Interpretive Essays, ed. Jon Stewart. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Follett, M. P. ([1918] 1998), The New State: Group Organization the Solution of Popular Government. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Good, J. A. (2006), A Search for Unity in Diversity: The ‘Permanent Hegelian Deposit’ in the Thought of John Dewey. Oxford: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Good, J. A.Harrison, J. (2010), ‘Traces of Hegelian Bildung in Dewey's Philosophy’, in P. Fairfield (ed.), Dewey and Continental Philosophy. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1969), Science of Logic, trans. A. V. Miller. Amherst: Humanity Books. (G. W. F. Hegel, Wissenschaft der Logik, vol. 2, 76-77. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1989.)Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1991), The Encyclopedia Logic, trans. T. F. Geraets, W. A. Suchting and H. S. Harris. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co. (G. W. F. Hegel, Enzyklopädie der philosophisen Wissenschaften im Grundrisse (1830). Erster Teil: Die Wissenschaft der Logik mit den mündlichen Zusätzen, ed. E. Moldenhauer and K. M. Michel, Werke in zwanzig Bänden, Vol. 8. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 169.).Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1989), Science of Logic. (G. W. F. Hegel, Wissenschaft der Logik I. Erster Teil: Die Objektive Logik, Erstes Buch, ed. E. Moldenhauer and K. M. Michel, Werke in zwanzig Bänden, vol. 5. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1970, 193.). Trans. A. V. Miller. Amherst, New York. Humanity Books.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1990), Lectures on the History of Philosophy, Volume III: Medieval and Modern Philosophy, ed. R. F. Brown, trans. R. F. Brown and J. M. Stewart. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Houlgate, S. (2005), An Introduction to Hegel: Freedom, Truth and History. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
James, W. (1975), Pragmatism and The Meaning of Truth. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
James, W. (1979), The Will to Believe and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lamberth, D. C. (1999), William James and the Metaphysics of Experience. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marcuse, H. (1960), Reason and Revolution: Hegel and the Rise of Social Theory. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Maker, W. (2007), ‘Identity, Difference, and the Logic of Otherness’, in P. T. Grier (ed.), Identity and Difference: Studies in Hegel's Logic, Philosophy of Spirit, and Politics. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Morse, D. 2005, ‘William James's Neglected Critique of Hegel,’ Idealistic Studies 35(2-3), 199-214.Google Scholar
Mueller, G. E. (1982), ‘The Hegel Legend of “Thesis-Antithesis-Synthesis”’, in J. B. Stewart (ed.), The Hegel Myths and Legends. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
O'Shea, J. R. (2000), ‘Sources of Pluralism in William James’, in Maria Baghramian and Attracta Ingram (eds.), Pluralism: The Philosophy and Politics of Diversity. New York: Routledge, pp. 17-43.Google Scholar
Reeve, G. E. (1970), ‘William James on Pure Being and Pure Nothing’, Philosophy 45(171), 59-60.Google Scholar
Rinaldi, G. (1992), A History and Interpretation of the Logic of Hegel. Lewiston: Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
Rockmore, T. (2010), ‘Dewey, Hegel, and Knowledge after Kant’, in P. Fairfield (ed.), Dewey and Continental Philosophy. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Sprigge, T. L. S. (1993), James and Bradley: American Truth and British Reality. Chicago: Open Court Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Wahl, J. (1925), The Pluralist Philosophies of England and America. London: The Open Court Company.Google Scholar
Wilkins, B. T. (1956), ‘James, Dewey, and Hegelian Idealism’, Journal of the History of Ideas 17: 3:332-3346.Google Scholar
Wilshire, B. (1997), ‘The Breathtaking Intimacy of the Material World: William James's Last Thoughts’, in R. A. Putman (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to William James. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar