No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Comparison of the Propulsion Performance of Aerospike and Bell-Shaped Nozzle Using Hydrogen Peroxide Monopropellant Under Sea-Level Condition
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 July 2018
Abstract
This study investigates numerically the performance of applying aerospike nozzle in a hydrogen peroxide mono-propellant propulsion system. A set of governing equations, including continuity, momentum, energy and species conservation equations with extended k-ε turbulence equations, are solved using the finite-volume method. The hydrogen peroxide mono-propellant is assumed to be fully decomposed into water vapor and oxygen after flowing through a catalyst bed before entering the nozzle. The aerospike nozzle is expected to have high performance even in deep throttling cases due to its self-compensating characteristics in a wide range of ambient pressure environments. The results show that the thrust coefficient efficiency (Cf,η) of this work exceeds 90% of the theoretical value with a nozzle pressure ratio (PR) in the range of 20 ~ 45. Many complex gas dynamics phenomena in the aerospike nozzle are found and explained in the paper. In addition, performance of the aerospike nozzle is compared with that of the bell-shape nozzle.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics 2018
References
REFERENCES
Sutton, G. P. and Biblarz, O., Rocket Propulsion Elements, 7th Edition, JOHN WILEY & SONS INC., City of Publication (2001).Google Scholar
Marchi, C. H., Laroca, F., de Silva, A. F. C. and Hinckel, J. N., “Numerical Solutions of Flow in Rocket Engines with Regenerative Cooling,” Numerical Heat Transfer, Part A: Applications, 45, pp. 699–717 (2004).Google Scholar
Frey, M. and Hagemann, G., “Restricted Shock Separation in Rocket Nozzles,” Journal of Propulsion and Power, 16, pp. 478–484 (2000).Google Scholar
Loh, C. Y. and Zaman, K. B. M. Q., “Numerical Investigation of Transonic Resonance with a Convergent–Divergent Nozzle,” AIAA Journal, Doi.org/10.2514/2.1607Google Scholar
Wasko, R. A., “Performance of Annular Plug and Expansion-Deflection Noozles Including External Flow Effects at Transonic Mach Numbers,” NASA Technical Note, NASA TN D-4462 (1968).Google Scholar
Liu, Y.L. et al., “Development of a Quad Hybrid Rocket Engine Levitating Platform,” 2nd International Conference on Aerospace Engineering (ICOAE 2018), Seoul, Korea (2018).Google Scholar
Tomita, T., Tamura, H. and Takahashi, M., “An Experimental Evaluation of Plug Nozzle Flow Field,” AIAA, ASME, SAE, and ASEE, Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, Florida, U.S.A (1996).Google Scholar
Ito, T., Fujii, K. and Hayashi, A. K., “Computations of Axisymmetric Plug-Nozzle Flowfelds: Flow Structures and Thrust Performance,” Journal of Propulsion and Power, 18, pp. 254–260 (2002).Google Scholar
Chen, Y. S. et al., “Multiphysics Simulations of Rocket Engine Combustion,” Computers & Fluids, 45, pp. 29–36 (2011).Google Scholar
Chen, Y. S. and Kim, S. W., “Computation of Turbulent Flows Using an Extended k-epsilon Turbulence Closure Model,” NASA Contractor Report, NASA CR-179204, NASA-Marshall Space Flight Center Marshall Space Flight Center, Alabama (1987).Google Scholar
Cheng, G. C. and Farmer, R., “Real Fluid Modeling of Multiphase Flows in Liquid Rocket Engine Combustors,” Journal of Propulsion and Power, 22, pp. 1373–1381 (2006).Google Scholar
Lárusson, R., Andersson, N., Eriksson, L.-E. and Östlund, J., “Investigation of a Separated Nozzle Flow with Transonic Resonance Using Dynamic Mode Decomposition,” Chalmers Research Report, ISSN, pp. 1652–8549 (2014).Google Scholar
Dippold III, V. F. and Zaman, K. B. M. Q., “An Investigation of Transonic Resonance in A Mach 2.2 Round Convergent-Divergent Nozzle,” AIAA 2015 SciTech (2015).Google Scholar