Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T01:58:32.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Faecal output and estimated voluntary dry-matter intake of grazing beef cows, relative to their live weight and to the digestibility of the pasture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

I. Bruckental
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Science, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, PO Box 6, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel
A. R. Lehrer
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Science, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, PO Box 6, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel
M. Weitz
Affiliation:
Range Management Division, Soil Conservation Service, Ministry of Agriculture, Tel Aviv 61070, Israel
J. Bernard
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Science, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, PO Box 6, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel
Hanna Kennit
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Science, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, PO Box 6, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel
H. Neumark
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Science, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, PO Box 6, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel
Get access

Abstract

Two experiments were carried out with 12 non-pregnant, non-lactating beef cows (Simmental x Hereford cross), six in each experiment. In experiment 1, the cows were grazing stubble pasture and each cow was hand fed 750 g/day soya-bean meal. In experiment 2, the cows were grazing green pasture at the pre-blossom stage. Paraffin-coated magnesium ferrite (MF) was used as an external marker. A capsule containing 5 g marker was administered to each cow twice daily at about 08.00 and 14.00 h. At the same time the cows were also weighed and faecal grab samples (GS) were taken. Each experimental period lasted 18 days: a 10-day period for attaining steady state of the marker, followed by an 8-day period during which faecal GS were taken.

Average live weight (LW, kg) and daily faecal output (DFO, kg dry matter (DM) per day) were, respectively 364·2 and 3·39 for cows in experiment 1, and 484·4 and 4·62 in experiment 2. DFO (g): LW (kg) ratios were 9·31: 1 and 9·53: 1 in experiments 1 and 2, respectively.

In-vitro digestibilities were used for calculating the voluntary intake (kg DM per day), which was found to be 6·8 and 13·6 for cows grazing stubble and pre-blossom pastures, respectively. The relationships between LW of grazing cattle and their DFO and voluntary food intake are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1980. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 13th ed. (ed. Horwitz, W.) Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Baker, R. D., Alvarez, F. and Le Dli, Y. L. P. 1981. The effect of herbage allowance upon the herbage intake and performance of suckler cows and calves. Grass and Forage Science 36: 189199.Google Scholar
Barash, H., Neumark, H. and Heffer, E. 1984. Diet absorption determination in tilapia using magnesium ferrite as a reference and Michel wound clips for increasing the amount of feces available. Nutrition Reports International 29: 527532.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. and Mitchell, H. H. 1948. The factorization of the protein requirements of ruminants and of the protein values of feeds with particular reference to the significance of the metabolic fecal nitrogen. Journal of Animal Science 7: 351372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L., Wainman, F. W. and Wilson, R. S. 1961. The regulation of food intake by sheep. Animal Production 3: 5161.Google Scholar
Conrad, H. R., Pratt, A. D. and Hibbs, J. W. 1964. Regulation of feed intake in dairy cows. I. Change in the importance of physical and physiological factors with increasing digestibility. Journal of Dairy Science 47: 5462.Google Scholar
Cordova, F. J., Wallace, J. D. and Pieper, R. D. 1978. Forage intake by grazing livestock: a review. Journal of Range Management 31: 430438.Google Scholar
Elliott, R. C. and Fokkema, K. 1961. Herbage consumption studies on beef cattle. Part I. Rhodesia Agricultural Journal 58: 4957.Google Scholar
Elliott, R. C., Fokkema, K. and French, C. H. 1961. Herbage consumption studies on beef cattle. Part II. Rhodesia Agricultural Journal 58: 124130.Google Scholar
Hodgson, J. 1968. The relationship between the digestibility of a sward and the herbage consumption of grazing calves. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 70: 4751.Google Scholar
Kahn, H. E. and Spedding, C. R. W. 1984. A dynamic model for the simulation of cattle herd production systems. 2. An investigation of various factors influencing the voluntary intake of dry matter and the use of the model in their validation. Agricultural Systems 13: 6382.Google Scholar
Lancaster, R. J. 1954. Measurement of feed intake of grazing cattle and sheep. V. Estimation of the feed-to-faeces ration from the nitrogen content of the faeces of pasture fed cattle. New Zealand Journal of Science and Technology 36A: 1520.Google Scholar
Neumark, H., Bielorai, R. and Iosif, B. 1982. Magnesium ferrite as a marker in absorption trials with chicks. Journal of Nutrition 112: 387390.Google Scholar
Neumark, H., Halevi, A., Amir, S. and Yerushalmi, S. 1975. Assay and use of magnesium ferrite as a reference in absorption trials with cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 58: 14761481.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tilley, J. M. A. and Terry, R. A. 1963. A two-stage technique for the in-vitro digestion of forage crops. Journal of British Grassland Society 18: 104111.Google Scholar
Vercoe, J. E. and Tribe, D. E. 1962. The estimation of the intake of grazing sheep. I. Establishment of faecal nitrogen regressions. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 59: 343348.Google Scholar