The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of topical lignocaine in reducing the pain of pack removal after nasal surgery. Fifty-eight patients with Merocel nasal packs in situ after nasal surgery were randomized to receive 10 ml of either 2 per cent lignocaine or 0.9 per cent saline on the packs 10 minutes prior to their removal and thepain experienced on their removal was recorded on a visual analogue scale. The median pain score was 3.4 in the lignocaine group and 2.9 in the saline group with no statistical evidence of adifference between the two groups. There was no statistical evidence of an association between the group and the operation performed, the use of intra-operative Moffat’s solution or the use of post-operative oral analgesia. We conclude that lignocaine used in this way does not reduce the pain of pack removal after nasal surgery.

Background and objective: Epidural analgesia is the most effective method for pain relief during labour. The aim was to elucidate the efficacy of ropivacaine 0.05% and bupivacaine 0.05%, which were both combined with fentanyl 0.00015% to provide analgesia in labour.

Methods: Forty nulliparous females were enrolled into the study. After insertion of an epidural catheter, patients were randomly assigned into two groups. Once the os uteri had dilated to 4–5 cm, a bolus of bupivacaine 0.125% 10 mL + fentanyl 50 μg (1 mL) in Group 1 patients, and ropivacaine 0.125% 10 mL + fentanyl 50 μg (1 mL) in Group 2 patients was administered via the epidural catheter. Then, patient-controlled epidural analgesia was started with a basal infusion of bupivacaine 0.05% 10 mL h−1 + fentanyl 0.00015% 1.5 μg mL−1 in Group 1, and ropivacaine 0.05% + fentanyl 1.5 μg mL−1 in Group 2. When needed, a 10 mL bolus infusion could be given and the lockout time was 20 min. Maternal and fetal haemodynamic variables were monitored before induction and subsequently at 5 min intervals. Using a visual analogue scale assessed the degree of pain.

Results: Maternal haemodynamic variables and Apgar scores were not different between the two groups. The second stage of the labour was shorter in Group 2 (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences in patients’ assessment of motor block or mode of delivery between groups.

Conclusions: An epidural infusion (10 mL h−1) of bupivacaine 0.05% or ropivacaine 0.05% together with fentanyl 1.5 μg mL−1 provided good and safe analgesia during labour.

This randomized double blind study investigates the relative efficacies of controlled analgesia (PCA) regimens in three different patient groups: epidural diamorphine 2.5mg followed by PCA bolus 1mg with a 20-min lockout (Gp1), subcutaneous diamorphine 2.5mg followed by PCA bolus with a 10-min lockout period (Gp2) and epidural diamorphine 2.5mg in 4mL of 0.125% (w/v) bupivacaine followed by a PCA bolus of 1mg diamorphine in 4mL 0.125% (w/v) bupivacaine with a 20-min lockout (Gp3). Patients were evaluated at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 and 48 h. Patients in Gp2 consumed significantly more diamorphine than those in Gp1 or Gp3 (P>0.05), but their pain scores were higher only at 1, 2 and 3 h (P>0.05) with respect to Gp3 and at 1 h with respect to Gp1. Fewer side effects (sedation, pruritis and nausea as assessed by antiemetic requirements) occurred in Gp2 compared to Gp1 (P>0.05). Fewer patients in Gp2 required catheterization than in Gp3 (P>0.05). This study indicates that the use of PCA epidural diamorphine, either alone or in combination with bupivacaine, reduces the dose requirement for analgesia but offers little clinical advantage over subcutaneous PCA diamorphine.

A number of methods exist by which the pH of local anaesthetic solutions may be increased. Most commonly, these require the addition of differing amounts of sodium bicarbonate solution according to the local anaesthetic drugs. Sodium bicarbonate (1%) was titrated against pH in six commonly used local anaesthetic solutions. Titration curves of pH and volume of sodium bicarbonate solution added are shown for this group of local anaesthetics. This study demonstrates that 1 mL of 1% sodium bicarbonate solution may be used to alkalinize this range of local anaesthetics without the risk of precipitation. We also conclude that Ropivacaine (at concentration 0.75% and 1.0%), is unsuitable for alkalinization since it precipitates at a pH of 6.0.

Epidural analgesia is one of the preferred methods of analgesia for labour. The aim of the present survey was to evaluate current practice in obstetric analgesia in departments of anaesthesia and to make a comparison with former surveys from Germany and other countries. Questionnaires on the practice of pain relief, especially epidural analgesia, during labour and delivery were sent to 1178 anaesthesic departments in Germany in the second half of 1996. Five hundred and thirty-two completed replies were received, which represent 46.9% of all German obstetric units. The majority of the departments of anaesthesia practising epidural analgesia have an epidural rate of less than 10% and 10.2% of the departments do not offer this method to their parturients. In 86.8% of all units performing epidural analgesia, the epidural catheter is placed by an anaesthetist. Only 6.5% of the units provide a 24-h epidural service which is exclusively assigned to labour and delivery. In 77.8% of the units, this service is not exclusively assigned to obstetrics, but also to other duties. Of the obstetric units offering epidural analgesia, 14.7% have no epidural service at night. Plain local anaesthetics for epidural analgesia are used by 55.9% of the departments, a combination of local anaesthetics with epidural opioids by 28.7%. Epidural analgesia is predominantly (82.2%) maintained by intermittent bolus administration. Although the rate of epidural analgesia increased during recent decades, this method is not offered to all parturients. Further improvements in the use of epidural analgesia for labour seem to be necessary.

Besides the fast tetrodotoxin-sensitive Na+ current, small dorsal root ganglion neurones of rats also possess a slower tetrodotoxin-resistant Na+ current. The blocking effect of commonly used local anaesthetics upon the tetrodotoxin-resistant Na+ current was investigated in the present paper. Dorsal root ganglia were dissected from adult rats and cells were enzymatically isolated. The whole-cell patch clamp technique was then used to measure inward Na+ currents of small dorsal root ganglion neurones. Externally applied local anaesthetics reversibly blocked the tetrodotoxin-resistant Na+ current in a dose-dependent manner. Half-maximal blocking concentrations for tonic block were: lignocaine, 326 μm; prilocaine, 253 μm; mepivacaine, 166 μm; etidocaine, 196 μm bupivacaine, 57 μm procaine, 518 μm benzocaine, 489 μm; tetracaine, 21 μm; and dibucaine, 23 μm. Blocking of the current by lignocaine was independent of temperature. The quaternary lignocaine derivative QX-314 did not have any effect upon the tetrodotoxin-resistant Na+ current when applied externally. High concentrations of tetrodotoxin also blocked the tetrodotoxin-resistant Na+ current with a half-maximal blocking concentration of 115 μm. The block by high tetrodotoxin concentrations did not compete with the lignocaine block, suggesting that there were two independent blocking mechanisms for the two substances. The tetrodotoxin-resistant Na+ currents also showed a marked sensitivity to phasic (use-dependent) block by local anaesthetics.