Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • 7 - Dolls and Idols in the English Reformation

  • from Part II - Objects and Places
  • Edited by Alexandra Walsham, University of Cambridge, Bronwyn Wallace, Ceri Law, University of Cambridge, Brian Cummings, University of York
  • Book:
    Memory and the English Reformation
    Published online:
    30 October 2020
    Print publication:
    12 November 2020, pp 153-167

  • Summary

    This chapter begins with a sermon from the 1530s that describes the iconoclastic practice of giving formerly sacred objects to children, in order to desacralise them. It shows that this was a widespread activity during the Reformation, and relates this practice of iconoclastic child’s play to the common polemical tactic of comparing traditional Roman Catholic religion to the inane playing of children. It then argues, however, that the actual transformation of such objects into playthings is more complex than this polemical elision, and shows that, when related to broader Christian traditions, the implicit claim that playing with an object is necessarily to demean it becomes far less clear. Play could be a way of accessing or reflecting the divine, not trivialising it. The object of iconoclastic child’s play, suspended between idol and doll, does not therefore clearly lack value, but becomes a potent and unstable object upon which competing conceptions and valuations converge, and within which they can co-exist.