Comorbid depression substantially affects the management of glycemia and diabetes-related complications among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. In this study, we sought to determine the association between weight change over 4 years and depression risk among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

This population-based retrospective cohort study from the National Health Insurance Services of Korea included 1 111 345 patients with type 2 diabetes who were divided into groups according to body weight change over 4 years. Body weight changes were compared with the preceding 4-year period (2005–2008). Depression was defined according to the International Classification of Diseases 10th revision code for depression (F32 and F33) on one or more inpatient or outpatient claims.

During a median follow-up of 7.4 years, 244 081 cases of depression were identified. We observed a U-shaped association between body weight change and depression risk with a higher risk among both groups of weight loss (hazard ratio (HR) 1.17, 95% CI 1.15–1.19 for ⩾ −10%; HR 1.07, 95% CI 1.06–1.08 for −10 to −5%) and weight gain (HR 1.06, 95% CI 1.04–1.08 for ⩾10%; HR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01–1.04 for 5–10%) compared with the stable weight group (−5 to 5%).

A U-shaped association between body weight change and depression risk was observed in this large nationwide cohort study. Our study suggests that patients with type 2 diabetes and weight change, either gain or loss, could be considered a high-risk group for depression.

Many previous studies have shown that the APOE e4 genotype affects cognition, brain volume, glucose metabolism and amyloid deposition. However, these studies were conducted separately, and few studies simultaneously investigated the effects of the APOE e4 genotype on cognition, brain volume, glucose metabolism and amyloid deposition in Alzheimer disease (AD). The purpose of this study is to simultaneously investigate the association of the APOE e4 genotype with cognition, brain volume, glucose metabolism and amyloid deposition in patients with AD.

This is a cross-sectional study of 69 subjects with Alzheimer’s disease (AD). All subjects were divided into carriers and noncarriers of the ε4 allele. Forty APOE ε4 carriers and 29 APOE ε4 non-carriers underwent neuropsychological, structural magnetic resonance imaging, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scans (18F-FDG-PET) and 18F-Florbetaben amyloid positron emission tomography scans (amyloid PET). Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was conducted to compare the differences on cognition, brain volume, glucose metabolism and amyloid deposition between APOE ε4 carriers and non-carriers after controlling demographics.

APOE ε4 carriers had 50% lower scores of SVLT_delayed recall compared to non-carriers (0.88 ± 1.65 vs 1.76 ± 1.75). However, APOE ε4 carriers performed better on other cognitive tests than non- carriers (K-BNT (11.04 ± 2.55 vs 9.66 ± 2.82), RCFT (25.73 ± 8.56 vs 20.15 ± 10.82), and Stroop test_color response (48.28 ± 26.33 vs 31.56 ± 27.03)). APOE ε4 carriers had slightly smaller hippocampal volume than non-carriers (3.09 ± 0.38 vs 3.32 ± 0.38), but greater total brain cortical thickness (1.45 ± 1.55 vs 1.37 ± 1.24).

We found that APOE e4 genotype is associated with cognition, brain volume in AD, suggesting that APOE e4 genotype can play a very important role in the underlying pathogenesis of AD.

Previous studies investigating neuropsychological profiles of cognitive impairment people have found a learning curve can be a useful indicator of AD diagnosis or progression. However, the data on the relationship between amyloid β (Aβ) deposition status and the learning curve in amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) are limited. In this study, we investigate the role of the learning curve in predicting Aβ deposition status in patients with aMCI.

This is a cross-sectional study of 67 aMCI patients (N = 67; 33 aMCI with amyloid positive (Aβ-PET (+)), and 34 aMCI with amyloid negative (Aβ-PET (-))). All participants underwent Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery for a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery and brain MRI. To determine Aβ deposition status, each participant underwent amyloid PET scans using 18F-florbetaben. The learning curve was obtained using immediate recall of Seoul Verbal Learning Test-learning curve (SVLT- learning curve). The association of cognitive test scores and dichotomized Aβ deposition status was examined using logistic regression models in patients with aMCI. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to examine the predictive ability of cognitive test to detect Aβ deposition status in aMCI.

Logistic regression models showed that SVLT-learning curve and Rey Complex Figure Test- delayed recall (RCFT-delayed recall) scores were significantly associated with Aβ deposition status. In ROC analysis to assess the predictive power, SVLT-learning curve (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.734, P = 0.001) and RCFT-delayed recall (AUC = 0.739, P = 0.001) independently discriminated Aβ-PET (+) and Aβ-PET (-). The combination of these clinical markers (SVLT-learning curve and RCFT-delayed recall) improved the predictive accuracy of Aβ-PET (+) (AUC = 0.833, P < 0.001).

Our findings of association of Aβ deposition status with SVLT-learning curve and RCFT- delayed recall suggest that these cognitive tests could be a useful screening tool for Aβ deposition status among aMCI patients in resource-limited clinics.

Mental illness among survivors of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-2019) during the post-illness period is an emerging and important health issue.

We aimed to investigate the prevalence of mental illness and the associated factors for its development among COVID-2019 survivors.

From 1 January to 4 June 2020, data were extracted from the National Health Insurance Service COVID-19 database in South Korea. Patients with COVID-19 were defined as those whose test results indicated that they had contracted the infection, regardless of disease severity. COVID-19 survivors were defined as those who recovered from the infection. The primary end-point was the development of mental illness, which was evaluated between 1 January and 1 December 2020.

A total 260 883 individuals were included in this study, and 2.36% (6148) were COVID-19 survivors. The COVID-19 survivors showed higher prevalence of mental illness than the control group (12.0% in the COVID-19 survivors v. 7.7% in the control group; odds ratio (OR) = 2.40, 95% CI 2.21–2.61, P < 0.001). Additionally, compared with the control group, the no specific treatment for COVID-19 group (OR = 2.23, 95% CI 2.03–2.45, P < 0.001) and specific treatment for COVID-19 group (OR = 3.27, 95% CI 2.77–3.87, P < 0.001) showed higher prevalence of mental illness among survivors.

In South Korea, COVID-19 survivors had a higher risk of developing mental illness compared with the rest of the populations. Moreover, this trend was more evident in COVID-19 survivors who experienced specific treatment in the hospital.

To conduct international comparisons of self-reports, collateral reports, and cross-informant agreement regarding older adult psychopathology.

We compared self-ratings of problems (e.g. I cry a lot) and personal strengths (e.g. I like to help others) for 10,686 adults aged 60–102 years from 19 societies and collateral ratings for 7,065 of these adults from 12 societies.

Data were obtained via the Older Adult Self-Report (OASR) and the Older Adult Behavior Checklist (OABCL; Achenbach et al., 2004).

Cronbach’s alphas were .76 (OASR) and .80 (OABCL) averaged across societies. Across societies, 27 of the 30 problem items with the highest mean ratings and 28 of the 30 items with the lowest mean ratings were the same on the OASR and the OABCL. Q correlations between the means of the 0–1–2 ratings for the 113 problem items averaged across all pairs of societies yielded means of .77 (OASR) and .78 (OABCL). For the OASR and OABCL, respectively, analyses of variance (ANOVAs) yielded effect sizes (ESs) for society of 15% and 18% for Total Problems and 42% and 31% for Personal Strengths, respectively. For 5,584 cross-informant dyads in 12 societies, cross-informant correlations averaged across societies were .68 for Total Problems and .58 for Personal Strengths. Mixed-model ANOVAs yielded large effects for society on both Total Problems (ES = 17%) and Personal Strengths (ES = 36%).

The OASR and OABCL are efficient, low-cost, easily administered mental health assessments that can be used internationally to screen for many problems and strengths.

Here, we present an overview of how a tertiary hospital responded to maintain necessary activities and protect patients and staff from the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak.

Gil Medical Center, a tertiary hospital in Incheon, has operated a special response team since January 21, 2020. All visitors were assessed for body temperature and respiratory symptoms, and screened for recent overseas travel. Suspected COVID-19 patients were taken to a screening clinic. All febrile patients with or without respiratory symptoms were taken to a respiratory safety clinic. An isolation ward, which consisted of 10 negative-pressure rooms, was used to treat confirmed cases. More than 120 beds were prepared for the outbreak, and patients with pneumonia were preemptively isolated.

By May 5, 480 960 visitors were assessed at the control station, 3350 patients visited the triage center, and 1794 were treated in the respiratory safety clinic. Seventeen confirmed cases were admitted to the negative isolation ward, and 350 patients with pneumonia were preemptively isolated. A total of 2977 severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) polymerase chain reaction tests were performed.

While tertiary hospitals play an important role in treating both COVID-19 patients and non-COVID-19 patients, hospital staff have to protect themselves from unexpected in-hospital transmission. A multifaceted response must be undertaken to protect tertiary hospitals and their staff during the COVID-19 epidemic.

To investigate the impacts of depression screening, diagnosis and treatment on major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

Prospective cohort study including a nested 24-week randomised clinical trial for treating depression was performed with 5–12 years after the index ACS. A total of 1152 patients recently hospitalised with ACS were recruited from 2006 to 2012, and were divided by depression screening and diagnosis at baseline and 24-week treatment allocation into five groups: 651 screening negative (N), 55 screening positive but no depressive disorder (S), 149 depressive disorder randomised to escitalopram (E), 151 depressive disorder randomised to placebo (P) and 146 depressive disorder receiving medical treatment only (M).

Cumulative MACE incidences over a median 8.4-year follow-up period were 29.6% in N, 43.6% in S, 40.9% in E, 53.6% in P and 59.6% in M. Compared to N, screening positive was associated with higher incidence of MACE [adjusted hazards ratio 2.15 (95% confidence interval 1.63–2.83)]. No differences were found between screening positive with and without a formal depressive disorder diagnosis. Of those screening positive, E was associated with a lower incidence of MACE than P and M. M had the worst outcomes even compared to P, despite significantly milder depressive symptoms at baseline.

Routine depression screening in patients with recent ACS and subsequent appropriate treatment of depression could improve long-term cardiac outcomes.

Serotonergic dysfunction may play an important role in motor and nonmotor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease (PD). The loudness dependence of auditory evoked potentials (LDAEP) has been used to evaluate serotonergic activity. Therefore, this study aimed to determine central serotonergic activity using LDAEP in de novo PD according to the age at onset and changes in serotonergic activity after dopaminergic treatment.

A total of 30 patients with unmedicated PD, 16 in the early-onset and 14 in the late-onset groups, were enrolled. All subjects underwent comprehensive neurological examination, laboratory tests, the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale, and LDAEP. The LDAEP was calculated as the slope of the two N1/P2 peaks measured at the Cz electrode, first at baseline conditions (pretreatment) and a second time after 12 weeks (post-treatment) following dopaminergic medications.

The absolute values of pretreatment N1/P2 LDAEP (early-onset: late-onset, 0.99 ± 0.68: 1.62 ± 0.88, p = 0.035) and post-treatment N1 LDAEP (early-onset: late-onset, −0.61 ± 0.61: −1.26 ± 0.91, p = 0.03) were significantly lower in the early-onset group compared with those of the late-onset group. In addition, a higher value of pretreatment N1/P2 LDAEP was significantly correlated with the late-onset group (coefficient = 1.204, p = 0.044). The absolute value of the N1 LDAEP decreased after 12 weeks of taking dopaminergic medication (pretreatment: post-treatment, −1.457 ± 1.078: −0.904 ± 0.812, p = 0.0018).

Based on the results of this study, LDAEP could be a marker for serotonergic neurotransmission in PD. Central serotonergic activity assessed by LDAEP may be more preserved in early-onset PD patients and can be altered with dopaminergic medication.