Growing evidence suggests that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) may be suitable for cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT). The optimal strategy regarding lead-in parenteral anticoagulation (PA) prior to DOAC is unknown.

In this post hoc analysis of the retrospective ACTION-CVT study, we compared patients treated with DOACs as part of routine care: those given “very early” DOAC (no PA), “early” (<5 days PA) and “delayed” (5–21 days PA). We compared baseline characteristics and outcomes between the very early/early and delayed groups. The primary outcome was a composite of day-30 CVT recurrence/extension, new peripheral venous thromboembolism, cerebral edema and intracranial hemorrhage.

Of 231 patients, 11.7% had very early DOAC, 64.5% early (median [IQR] 2 [1–2] days) and 23.8% delayed (5 [5–6] days). More patients had severe clinical/radiological presentations in the delayed group; more patients had isolated headaches in the very early/early group. Outcomes were better in the very early/early groups (90-day modified Rankin Scale of 0–2; 94.3% vs. 83.9%). Primary outcome events were rare and did not differ significantly between groups (2.4% vs. 2.1% delayed; adjusted HR 1.49 [95%CI 0.17–13.11]).

In this cohort of patients receiving DOAC for CVT as part of routine care, >75% had <5 days of PA. Those with very early/early initiation of DOAC had less severe clinical presentations. Low event rates and baseline differences between groups preclude conclusions about safety or effectiveness. Further prospective data will inform care.

Few studies have been conducted in Vietnam on the epidemiology of healthcare-associated infections or antimicrobial use. Thus, we sought to determine the prevalence of and risk factors for surgical-site infections (SSIs) and to document antimicrobial use in surgical patients in a large healthcare facility in Vietnam.

We conducted a point-prevalence survey of SSIs and antimicrobial use at Cho Ray Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, a 1,250-bed inpatient facility. All patients on the 11 surgical wards and 2 intensive care units who had surgery within 30 days before the survey date were included.

Of 391 surgical patients, 56 (14.3%) had an SSI. When we compared patients with and without SSIs, factors associated with infection included trauma (relative risk [RR], 2.65; 95% confidence interval [CI95], 1.60 to 4.37; P < .001), emergency surgery (RR, 2.74; CI95, 1.65 to 4.55; P < .001), and dirty wounds (RR, 3.77; CI95, 2.39 to 5.96; P < .001). Overall, 198 (51%) of the patients received antimicrobials more than 8 hours before surgery and 390 (99.7%) received them after surgery. Commonly used antimicrobials included third-generation cephalosporins and aminoglycosides. Thirty isolates were identified from 26 SSI patient cultures; of the 25 isolates undergoing antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 22 (88%) were resistant to ceftriaxone and 24 (92%) to gentamicin.

Our data show that (1) SSIs are prevalent at Cho Ray Hospital; (2) antimicrobial use among surgical patients is widespread and inconsistent with published guidelines; and (3) pathogens often are resistant to commonly used antimicrobials. SSI prevention interventions, including appropriate use of antimicrobials, are needed in this population.