We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
In a recent guest editorial in Discourse and Society, Billig (2000) argues that those of us who see ourselves as operating within a critical paradigm have a responsibility to continually challenge received orthodoxies, be they in the so-called mainstream, uncritical paradigms or within research and teaching that situates itself within a critical frame. His contention is that in a growing number of contexts, critical work can be seen to be approaching mainstream status as it establishes itself in the academic marketplace, and he proposes a perpetual vigilance in our practices to guard against the complacency that may come with even partial entry into the establishment (p. 292).
It was with these words in mind that I allowed myself to critically consider issues of empowerment, not only in my practice as a teacher of English as a second language (ESL) and academic literacy within what I call the corporatizing1 Australian university, but also from within my own positioning in and by the university and its new discourses. The title of this chapter intertextually speaks to an article that has acquired dominant status within the critical pedagogy community (see next section) and begins to ask whether, in the twenty-first century, our work can be empowering for ourselves and our students even as the sites within which we are working are being fundamentally reshaped by globalization and marketization. Higher education's restructuring not only of institutional identities as more entrepreneurial, but also of the professional identities of university teachers and those of their students through the marketization of public discourse has been highlighted by Fairclough (1995, p. 158).
In the EAP literature, the notion of an academic discipline constituting an academic discourse community into which new students will be ‘inducted’ or ‘initiated’ through EAP-type courses, particularly writing courses, while bringing a welcome social dimension to the teaching and learning of writing, is of limited usefulness if it presupposes a homogenous, unconflictual discourse community from which the power relations shaping the wider social context are absent. Theoretical frameworks and instructional models which oversimplify reality (Zamel, 1993), may neither help prepare our students to negotiate the complex social worlds they are entering nor necessarily assist EAP practitioners in their own negotiations with faculty in the disciplines. My ethnographic research into the development of the academic writing of black, ESL students, in their first year of study in the sociology department at a South African university, has led me to interrogate some current conceptions of discourse community which do not allow for sufficient understanding of the ways in which social inequalities may be being reproduced within the discourse community.
Driving my research was a need to understand better the relative lack of success of black, ESL students entering the university after the exclusionary apartheid years. The discourse community metaphor appeared to provide a helpful conceptual framework: if I could come to understand the norms and conventions, both implicit and explicit, governing writing in the community, I would, as an EAP teacher be better able to assist students in becoming successful in Sociology One.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.