We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To send content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about sending content to .
To send content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about sending to your Kindle.
Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
An abstract system of congruences describes a way of partitioning a space into finitely many pieces satisfying certain congruence relations. Examples of abstract systems of congruences include paradoxical decompositions and
$n$
-divisibility of actions. We consider the general question of when there are realizations of abstract systems of congruences satisfying various measurability constraints. We completely characterize which abstract systems of congruences can be realized by nonmeager Baire measurable pieces of the sphere under the action of rotations on the
$2$
-sphere. This answers a question by Wagon. We also construct Borel realizations of abstract systems of congruences for the action of
$\mathsf{PSL}_{2}(\mathbb{Z})$
on
$\mathsf{P}^{1}(\mathbb{R})$
. The combinatorial underpinnings of our proof are certain types of decomposition of Borel graphs into paths. We also use these decompositions to obtain some results about measurable unfriendly colorings.
We show that from large cardinals it is consistent to have the tree property simultaneously at
${\aleph _{{\omega ^2} + 1}}$
and
${\aleph _{{\omega ^2} + 2}}$
with
${\aleph _{{\omega ^2}}}$
strong limit.
We analyze the modified extender based forcing from Assaf Sharon’s PhD thesis. We show there is a bad scale in the extension and therefore weak square fails. We also present two metatheorems which give a rough characterization of when a diagonal Prikry-type forcing forces the failure of weak square.
The eleventh Appalachian Set Theory workshop was held at Carnegie Mellon University on April 3, 2010. The lecturer was Moti Gitik. As a graduate student Spencer Unger assisted in writing this chapter, which is based on the workshop lectures.
Introduction
The goal of these notes is to provide the reader with an introduction to the main ideas of a result due to Gitik [2].
Theorem 1.1 Let 〈κn ∣ n < ω〉 be an increasing sequence with each -strong, and κ =de f supn<ω κn. There is a cardinal preserving forcing extension in which no bounded subsets of κ are added and κω = κ++.
In order to present this result, we approach it by proving some preliminary theorems about different forcings which capture the main ideas in a simpler setting. For the entirety of the notes we work with an increasing sequence of large cardinals 〈κn ∣ n < ω〉 with κ =de f supn<ω κn. The large cardinal hypothesis that we use varies with the forcing. A recurring theme is the idea of a cell. A cell is a simple poset which is designed to be used together with other cells to form a large poset. Each of the forcings that we present has ω-many cells which are put together in a canonical way to make the forcing.
The eighth Appalachian Set Theory workshop was held at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh on February 28, 2009. The lecturer was Itay Neeman. As a graduate student Spencer Unger assisted in writing this chapter, which is based on the workshop lectures.
Introduction
The purpose of the workshop was to present a recent theorem due to Neeman [16].
Theorem 1.1From large cardinals, it is consistent that there is a singular strong limit cardinal κ of cofinality ω such that the Singular Cardinal Hypothesis fails at κ and the tree property holds at κ+.
The notes are intended to give the reader the flavor of the argument without going into the complexities of the full proof in [16]. Having read these notes, the motivated reader should be prepared to understand the full argument.We begin with a discussion of trees, which are natural objects in infinite combinatorics. One topic of interest is whether a tree has a cofinal branch. For completeness we recall some definitions.
Definition 1.2 Let λ be a regular cardinal and κ be a cardinal.
A λ-tree is a tree of height λ with levels of size less than λ.
A cofinal branch through a tree of height λ is a linearly ordered subset of order type λ.
A λ-Aronszajn tree is a λ-tree with no cofinal branch.
A κ+-tree is special if there is a function f : T → κ such that for all x; y ∈ T, if x T y then f(x) ≠ f(y).
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.