Background: Extrapulmonary nontuberculous mycobacteria (ENTM) infections are difficult to treat and often require prolonged therapy or surgery. Few population-based studies describe ENTM epidemiology, though well-known healthcare-associated outbreaks have occurred. Using the first year of multi-site ENTM surveillance, we characterized rates and how frequently ENTM infections may be related to healthcare. Methods: CDC’s Emerging Infections Program conducted active, laboratory- and population-based surveillance for ENTM cases in 4 sites (Colorado [5 counties], Minnesota [statewide], New York [1 county], and Oregon [statewide]) in 2021. An incident ENTM case was NTM isolation from a non-pulmonary specimen, excluding stool or rectal swabs, in a resident of the surveillance area without either medical record documentation of prior ENTM infection or isolation of ENTM in the prior 12 months. Demographic, clinical, information on selected healthcare and community exposures, and laboratory data were collected via medical record review. We calculated incidence per 100,000 population using U.S. Census population estimates and performed descriptive analyses. Results: A total of 180 incident ENTM cases were reported in 2021. The crude annual incidence rate was 1.3 per 100,000 persons. Incidence increased with age (from 0.95 per 100,000 among 0–17 year-olds to 2.65 per 100,000 among persons ≥65), ranged from 0.8 among non-Hispanic Asian persons to 1.6 per 100,000 in non-Hispanic Black persons, and was similar among males (1.3 per 100,000) and females (1.4 per 100,000; Figure 1). Mycobacterium avium complex (64 [35.6%]) was the most frequently isolated species group, followed by Mycobacterium chelonae complex (31 [17.2%]). Skin and soft tissue infections were the most frequent infection type (37 [20.6%]); 27 cases (15.0%) were associated with disseminated and/or only bloodstream infection, and 56 cases (31.1%) had no infection type documented. Among 93 cases with localized ENTM infections (i.e., infections that were not disseminated and/or only bloodstream infections), 38.7% had only healthcare-related exposures, 14% had only community-related exposures and 6.5% had both exposure types at the site of infection (Figure 2). Healthcare-related exposures at the infection site included surgery (23.7%), injection/infusion (21.5%), and medical devices (18.3%). The most frequent community-related exposure at the infection site was trauma (17.2%). Only one case was part of a known outbreak, which was healthcare-associated. Conclusions: ENTM infections are relatively rare, but nearly half of patients with localized ENTM infections had prior healthcare-related exposures. This indicates that the burden of ENTM infections related to healthcare may be much larger than what has been suggested from reported outbreaks.

Background: Infections lead to high mortality among patients on chronic dialysis; knowledge of multi-drug resistant infections is limited. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Emerging Infections Program (EIP) conducts laboratory- and population-based surveillance for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) in 10 U.S. sites and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) in 9 U.S. sites. We investigated clinical characteristics, healthcare exposures, and outcomes of CRE and CRAB cases in persons on chronic dialysis from 2016-2021. Methods: Among EIP catchment-area residents on chronic dialysis, we defined a CRE case as the first isolation of Escherichia coli, Enterobacter cloacae complex, Klebsiella aerogenes (formerly Enterobacter aerogenes), Klebsiella oxytoca, Klebsiella pneumoniae, or Klebsiella variicola resistant to any carbapenem, from a normally sterile site or urine in a 30-day period. A CRAB case was defined as the first isolation of Acinetobacter baumannii complex resistant to any carbapenem (excluding ertapenem), from a normally sterile site or urine (or lower respiratory tract or wound since 2021) in a 30-day period. Medical records were reviewed. A case was considered colonized if the case culture had no associated infection type or colonization was documented in the medical record. Descriptive analyses, including analyses stratified by pathogen, were conducted. Results: Among 426 cases, 314 were CRE, and 112 were CRAB; most cases were male (235, 55.2%), Black (229, 53.8%), and 51-80 years old (320, 75.1%) (Table). An infection was associated with 363 (85.2%) case cultures; bloodstream infections (148; 40.8%), urinary tract infections (134; 36.9%), and pneumonia (17; 4.7%) were the most frequent. Overall, most cases had documented healthcare exposures (excluding outpatient dialysis) in the year before incident specimen collection, including: 366 (85.9%) hospitalizations, 235 (55.2%) surgeries, 209 (49.1%) long-term care facility stays, 54 (12.7%) long-term acute care facility stays. Additionally, 125 (29.3%) had an intensive care unit admission within the 7 days before incident specimen collection. Compared to CRE cases, a higher proportion of CRAB cases (a) had a long-term care facility stay (82/112 [73.2%] versus 127/314 [40.5%], P<.0001) or hospitalization (103/112 [92%] versus 263/314 [83.8%], P = .03) within the preceding year and (b) died within 30 days of incident specimen collection (40/112 [35.7%] versus 64/314 [20.4%], P = .001). Discussion: Among CRE and CRAB cases in persons on chronic dialysis, healthcare exposures were common, and mortality was high. Additional efforts to better describe the burden of these organisms and associated risk factors in the dialysis population are needed for tailoring infection prevention strategies to this vulnerable.

Background: Infection prevention and control (IPC) competency is critical for healthcare personnel (HCP) and patient safety. In collaboration with the CDC new national IPC training collaborative called Project Firstline, the Oregon Health Authority’s (OHA) Healthcare Associated Infection (HAI) Program established a state-level program in 2021. The goal of Oregon Project Firstline is to provide relevant, accessible, and engaging IPC training materials for our state’s HCP. We assessed the IPC learning needs of Oregon’s healthcare workforce, and to understand the preferred methods and formats of training across the various HCP roles. Methods: OHA’s HAI program recruited HCP by distributing electronic surveys through multiple healthcare, regulatory, and public health partners’ email listservs and HCP-targeted newsletters. Survey responses were recorded from September 23 to December 10, 2021. The HAI program assessed respondents’ IPC knowledge, online and in-person job training preferences, frequently used training devices, and trusted sources for IPC information. An individual’s understanding of an IPC topic was categorized based on their self-assessed confidence in their knowledge and ability to teach the topic to others. In total, 6,382 surveyed responses were analyzed. Results: The average understanding among HCP was lowest in IPC topics relating to triage and isolation of contagious patients and fit testing of respiratory protection devices. For these topics, 3,208 HCP (66.21%) and 3,657 HCP (75.48%) HCP, respectively, did not understand the topic well enough to teach others (Fig. 1). The highest number of HCP (n = 2,512, 39.36%) requested additional training in methods on how to educate others about IPC topics (ie, “train the trainer”). Surveyed respondents most frequently used personal computers for job trainings in both work and at-home settings (n = 4,603, 72.12%) and 3,437 HCP (53.85%) were open to either in-person or remote formats for job education. The CDC and OHA were the most frequented and trusted IPC sources among surveyed HCP: 4,124 HCP (64.62%) and 3,584 HCP (56.16%), respectively. Conclusions: IPC is a critical topic in HCP training across all healthcare facility types and employee roles. Effective educational planning includes understanding the learners’ knowledge needs and preferred methods of learning. Our learning needs assessment identified important IPC knowledge gaps and will help ensure that our training courses will be offered in effective educational formats for Oregon’s diverse HCP. Future training will include appropriate triage of potentially infectious patients, respiratory fit testing, and general IPC “train the trainer” sessions. Additionally, we will offer both in-person and remote options.

Disclosures: None

Background: Healthcare facilities have experienced many challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic, including limited personal protective equipment (PPE) supplies. Healthcare personnel (HCP) rely on PPE, vaccines, and other infection control measures to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infections. We describe PPE concerns reported by HCP who had close contact with COVID-19 patients in the workplace and tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Method: The CDC collaborated with Emerging Infections Program (EIP) sites in 10 states to conduct surveillance for SARS-CoV-2 infections in HCP. EIP staff interviewed HCP with positive SARS-CoV-2 viral tests (ie, cases) to collect data on demographics, healthcare roles, exposures, PPE use, and concerns about their PPE use during COVID-19 patient care in the 14 days before the HCP’s SARS-CoV-2 positive test. PPE concerns were qualitatively coded as being related to supply (eg, low quality, shortages); use (eg, extended use, reuse, lack of fit test); or facility policy (eg, lack of guidance). We calculated and compared the percentages of cases reporting each concern type during the initial phase of the pandemic (April–May 2020), during the first US peak of daily COVID-19 cases (June–August 2020), and during the second US peak (September 2020–January 2021). We compared percentages using mid-P or Fisher exact tests (α = 0.05). Results: Among 1,998 HCP cases occurring during April 2020–January 2021 who had close contact with COVID-19 patients, 613 (30.7%) reported ≥1 PPE concern (Table 1). The percentage of cases reporting supply or use concerns was higher during the first peak period than the second peak period (supply concerns: 12.5% vs 7.5%; use concerns: 25.5% vs 18.2%; p Conclusions: Although lower percentages of HCP cases overall reported PPE concerns after the first US peak, our results highlight the importance of developing capacity to produce and distribute PPE during times of increased demand. The difference we observed among selected groups of cases may indicate that PPE access and use were more challenging for some, such as nonphysicians and nursing home HCP. These findings underscore the need to ensure that PPE is accessible and used correctly by HCP for whom use is recommended.

Funding: None

Disclosures: None

Healthcare personnel with severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection were interviewed to describe activities and practices in and outside the workplace. Among 2,625 healthcare personnel, workplace-related factors that may increase infection risk were more common among nursing-home personnel than hospital personnel, whereas selected factors outside the workplace were more common among hospital personnel.

Background: Urinary tract infection (UTI) and Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) both pose significant diagnostic challenges. Excess testing has implications for hospital-associated infection surveillance and may also lead to overtreatment and associated patient risk. Accurate diagnosis requires stewardship efforts to ensure that the correct patients are tested appropriately. In coordination with clinicians and microbiology labs, hospital infection prevention departments can aid diagnostic stewardship efforts by creating policies for order indications and proper test collection methods and by developing electronic medical record (EMR) support for diagnostic and treatment algorithms. The prevalence of these practices in Oregon, however, is unknown. Methods: We deployed a web-based survey to infection preventionists at all 61 acute-care hospitals in Oregon in January 2019. Responses were collected through April 2019, and a subset of applicable questions were analyzed. Results: Of 61 acute-care hospitals, 58 (95%) responded. A response from a single long-term acute-care hospital was excluded. For urinary tract infections (UTIs), a minority of hospitals reported having policies requiring annual sterile urine collection training for registered nurses (n = 7, 12%), annual observation of the RN sterile urine collection procedure (n = 1, 2%), or use of boric acid containers for urine collection (n = 10, 17%). UTI testing and treatment algorithms embedded in the electronic medical record (EMR) were more common (Fig. 1). Regarding urine culture reflex policies, 39 facilities (68%) reported reflexing abnormal urinalyses to culture only if ordered, whereas 14 respondents (25%) reported automatically reflexed all abnormal urinalyses to culture. For Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), respondents reported using a variety of methods to discourage inappropriate testing (Fig. 2). Although almost all facilities (n = 53, 93%) reported having a policy to reject formed stool, less than half (n = 27, 47%) reported having a policy to reject stool in patients receiving laxatives. Furthermore, 74% of respondents (n = 42) had a published testing algorithm, more than twice the 18 (32%) hospitals that reported having a comparable UTI algorithm. Conclusions: Infection prevention departments in Oregon acute-care hospitals utilize a variety of tools to contribute to diagnostic and treatment stewardship for UTI and CDI. Our survey revealed many opportunities for improvement in UTI and C. difficile testing and treatment stewardship in Oregon hospitals. For example, although most hospitals reject formed stool for CDI testing, policies for other diagnosis and treatment stewardship techniques were much less commonly employed. Future work will compare the results of this survey to a set of similar questions on a statewide microbiology laboratory survey, assess best practices, and form consensus recommendations on stewardship practices for the state.

Funding: None

Disclosures: None

Background: Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) is a serious threat to patient safety due to limited treatment options and propensity to spread in healthcare settings. Using Emerging Infections Program (EIP) data, we describe changes in CRAB incidence and epidemiology. Methods: During January 2012 to December 2018, 9 sites (Colorado, Connecticut, Georgia, Maryland, Minnesota, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, and Tennessee) participated in active laboratory- and population-based surveillance. An incident case was defined as the first isolation of A. baumannii complex, in a 30-day period, resistant to ≥1 carbapenem (excluding ertapenem) from a normally sterile site or urine of a surveillance area resident. Cases were considered hospital-onset (HO) if the culture was collected >3 days after hospital admission; all others were community-onset (CO). Cases were classified as device-associated (DA) if the patient had 1 or more medical devices (ie, urinary catheter, central venous catheter (CVC), endotracheal/nasotracheal tube, tracheostomy, or another indwelling device) present in the 2 days prior to culture collection. Temporal trends were estimated using generalized linear models adjusted for age, race, sex, and EIP site. Results: Overall, 984 incident CRAB cases were identified, representing 849 patients. Among these patients, 291 (34%) were women, 510 (61%) were nonwhite, and the median age was 62 years (mean, 59; range, 0–102). Among the cases, 226 (23%) were HO; 758 (77%) were CO; and 793 (81%) were DA. Overall incidence rates in 2012 and 2018 were 1.58 (95% CI, 1.29–1.90) and 0.60 (95% CI, 0.40–0.67) per 100,000 population, respectively. There was a 15% annual decrease in incidence (adjusted rate ratio [aRR] 0.85; 95% CI: 0.82-0.88, P < .0001). Decreases were observed among sterile site (aRR 0.88; 95% CI, 0.84–0.93) and urine cases (aRR 0.83; 95% CI, 0.80–0.87). Annual decreases occurred for HO cases (aRR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.73–0.85) and CO cases (aRR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.83–0.9). The DA cases decreased 16% annually overall (aRR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.81–0.88). Decreases among cases in patients with CVC (aRR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.80–0.90) and urinary catheters (aRR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.80–0.88) were smaller than what was seen in patients with other indwelling devices (aRR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.77–0.86). Discussion: Overall, from 2012 to 2018, the incidence of CRAB decreased >60%. Decreases were observed in all case groups, regardless of source, infection onset location, or types of devices. Smaller annual decreases in rates of CO-CRAB than HO-CRAB suggest that there may be opportunities to accelerate prevention outside the hospital to further reduce the incidence of these difficult-to-treat infections.

Funding: None

Disclosures: None

Acute change in mental status (ACMS), defined by the Confusion Assessment Method, is used to identify infections in nursing home residents. A medical record review revealed that none of 15,276 residents had an ACMS documented. Using the revised McGeer criteria with a possible ACMS definition, we identified 296 residents and 21 additional infections. The use of a possible ACMS definition should be considered for retrospective nursing home infection surveillance.