To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure email@example.com
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Battles are milestones of human history. For the Middle Ages, much more so than for any subsequent period, we rely heavily on the accounts of contemporary historians, as we rarely have many archival records. However, as medieval historians were mainly clerics, they were often misinformed. Even a chronicler fond of chivalric prowess such as Froissart never went to a battlefield himself, and this was the case with many chroniclers. Thus, my aim is to answer a simple question: what types of sources did medieval chroniclers use in order to tell what happened in battles? I shall also offer a classification of these sources and an assessment of their accuracy and significance. First, I will consider the case of testimonies provided by warriors directly involved in combat. The role of the heralds of arms, so often quoted by the chroniclers, will also be studied. Then, I will turn to the use of archival documents, such as letters from kings and generals, and also other types of sources. Finally, I will consider the case of warrior-chroniclers, such as Villehardouin. Their use of personal memories does not necessarily mean that their narratives are more accurate. Like many others, they used many commonplaces and often narrated what should have happened in battles rather than what actually happened.
As deceptively simple as the title of this paper may seem, wide-ranging reflections on the provenance of the information used or contained in chronicles should not be limited to student handbooks. Actually, providing a simple list of sources used for battle narratives proves quite challenging, as each source raises many questions: how was it collected, used, reworked? Why were other documents ignored? Rather than merely providing an enumeration or classification of sources, this paper aims to provide a reflection on the art of medieval historians and on the relative trustworthiness of their works. To answer the question posed in the title, a comprehensive study of sources used in chronicles is indeed impossible. In spite of structural continuities, the four centuries I intend to explore show many evolutions in historical writing. Besides, each chronicle has its own sources and patterns that have to be analyzed carefully. There was no actual historical school in the Middle Ages, nor was there a specific type of education expected of all chroniclers.