We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Response to lithium in patients with bipolar disorder is associated with clinical and transdiagnostic genetic factors. The predictive combination of these variables might help clinicians better predict which patients will respond to lithium treatment.
Aims
To use a combination of transdiagnostic genetic and clinical factors to predict lithium response in patients with bipolar disorder.
Method
This study utilised genetic and clinical data (n = 1034) collected as part of the International Consortium on Lithium Genetics (ConLi+Gen) project. Polygenic risk scores (PRS) were computed for schizophrenia and major depressive disorder, and then combined with clinical variables using a cross-validated machine-learning regression approach. Unimodal, multimodal and genetically stratified models were trained and validated using ridge, elastic net and random forest regression on 692 patients with bipolar disorder from ten study sites using leave-site-out cross-validation. All models were then tested on an independent test set of 342 patients. The best performing models were then tested in a classification framework.
Results
The best performing linear model explained 5.1% (P = 0.0001) of variance in lithium response and was composed of clinical variables, PRS variables and interaction terms between them. The best performing non-linear model used only clinical variables and explained 8.1% (P = 0.0001) of variance in lithium response. A priori genomic stratification improved non-linear model performance to 13.7% (P = 0.0001) and improved the binary classification of lithium response. This model stratified patients based on their meta-polygenic loadings for major depressive disorder and schizophrenia and was then trained using clinical data.
Conclusions
Using PRS to first stratify patients genetically and then train machine-learning models with clinical predictors led to large improvements in lithium response prediction. When used with other PRS and biological markers in the future this approach may help inform which patients are most likely to respond to lithium treatment.
The response of garnet and zircon to prograde amphibolite-facies metamorphism in late Proterozoic mica schists from the Scottish Highlands has been investigated. Spatial analysis of zircon populations using scanning electron microscopy was undertaken in Dalradian Schists that have undergone a sequence of prograde garnet growth and localised breakdown reactions involving coupled dissolution–reprecipitation. Fluid availability and matrix permeability strongly control this metamorphic response and different generations of garnet contain radically different populations of metamorphic micro-zircon and associated changes in the detrital zircon population. Micro-zircon abundance increases during garnet growth, whereas that of detrital zircon decreases. The mineralogy of the matrix influences zircon abundance in porphyroblast phases, where garnet overgrows a micaceous matrix zircon-rich garnet forms and where it overgrows a quartzofeldspathic matrix the result is zircon-poor garnet. Following garnet growth, micro-zircon abundance decreases at each stage of the prograde reaction history, with sillimanite-zone schists containing the lowest abundance, suggesting micro-zircons are texturally less stable at staurolite- and sillimanite-grade metamorphism. Micro-zircons are distributed evenly across host minerals in the matrix, with the exception of retrograde chlorite where micro-zircons are absent due to fluids removing Zr before new zircon can precipitate. There is an overall decrease in the mode of zircon at each stage of the reaction history, indicating that zircon is a highly reactive phase during amphibolite-facies metamorphism and is very sensitive to individual prograde and retrograde reactions.
In this chapter we first consider finite element modeling of slender bodies undergoing bending deformation. This will be followed by a discussion on frame structures which can be modeled as an assemblage of slender bodies rigidly connected. First, we will introduce the Bernoulli--Euler theory of beam bending as a review and extension of what is typically covered in an undergraduate sophomore-level course on mechanics of materials. We will then introduce the frame element which can be used to model frame structures deforming in the 2D plane and 3D space.
In this chapter we introduce the concept of an arbitrary virtual displacement which may also be considered as an arbitrary weight function. This will be used to express the equilibrium equation for 3D solids and structures in a scalar integral form. Subsequently, the divergence theorem is applied to transform the scalar integral into another form to which the force boundary condition can be introduced. This results in the statement for the principle of virtual work involving internal virtual work and external virtual work. Internal virtual work and external virtual work will then be expressed in matrix form so that they can be used for the finite element formulation in later chapters. We then consider plane stress and plane strain problems in which the principle of virtual work can be expressed in 2D domains in accordance with simplifying conditions. In the last section, the Lagrange equation is derived within the context of deformable solid bodies, starting from the principle of virtual work.
In this chapter we present the finite element formulation of heat transfer problems which can be used to determine temperature distributions in solid bodies, starting with heat conduction in the 1D domain. Similar to the notion of virtual displacement in earlier chapters, a virtual temperature or an arbitrary weight function is introduced to derive an integral equivalent of the governing equation to which the finite element formulation is applied. Methods for heat conduction and convection, in 1D, 2D, and 3D domains, including time-dependent effects, will be covered. Mathematical equivalence with other scalar field problems is also discussed.
The finite element method is a powerful technique that can be used to transform any continuous body into a set of governing equations with a finite number of unknowns called degrees of freedom (DOF). In this chapter, we will introduce the fundamentals of the finite element method using a system of linear springs and a slender linear elastic body undergoing axial deformation as examples. These simple problems are chosen to describe the essential features of the finite element method which are common to analysis of more complicated structural systems such as 3D bodies.
This innovative approach to teaching the finite element method blends theoretical, textbook-based learning with practical application using online and video resources. This hybrid teaching package features computational software such as MATLAB®, and tutorials presenting software applications such as PTC Creo Parametric, ANSYS APDL, ANSYS Workbench and SolidWorks, complete with detailed annotations and instructions so students can confidently develop hands-on experience. Suitable for senior undergraduate and graduate level classes, students will transition seamlessly between mathematical models and practical commercial software problems, empowering them to advance from basic differential equations to industry-standard modelling and analysis. Complete with over 120 end-of chapter problems and over 200 illustrations, this accessible reference will equip students with the tools they need to succeed in the workplace.
In the finite element formulation, the body is divided into elements of various types. This chapter describes mapping functions for the description of element geometry in the undeformed configuration and shape functions for the description of displacement and thus deformed geometry in the 2D and 3D domains. We introduce the "isoparametric" formulation in which mapping functions and shape functions are identical. This is followed by discussions on integration in the mapped domains and numerical integration.
This chapter deals with the finite element formulation for thin plate and shell structures. We will review the assumptions on the kinematics of deformation from classical plate bending theories, introduce them into the finite element formulation for plates, and then extend the formulation to curved shell structures within the isoparametric formulation. For 3D solid elements that can be used for plates and shell analysis, we will first look at solid elements with three nodes through the thickness. We will then show how solid elements with two nodes through the thickness can be constructed for analysis of plate and shell structures.
In this chapter we first describe how to construct the element stiffness matrix and load vector in 2D domains. The mapping and shape functions derived in the previous chapter are introduced to express strain components in terms of nodal DOF. Extension of the finite element formulation to 3D domains is demonstrated using the eight-node hexahedron as an example. For dynamic problems, the element mass matrix can be formed by treating the inertia effect as a body force applied to the element. The global mass matrix is then assembled to construct the equation of motion for analyses of free vibration and forced vibration. In the last section, we briefly discuss important aspects of finite element modeling and analysis that often arise in 2D and 3D problems where the number of DOF can be large. We discuss issues, such as sparse matrices and mesh generation, which early students of the finite element method may find helpful for future reference.
In this chapter we consider the finite element formulation for bending of slender bodies under a tensile or compressive axial force. In order to capture the effect of axial force we look at the force and moment equilibrium in the deformed configuration, but still assuming small translational displacement and rotation of the cross-section. In the finite element formulation, it is shown that the effect of axial force on bending manifests as an effective bending stiffness. It will be shown that the finite element formulation of a slender body under compressive axial force results in a matrix equation for eigenvalue analysis from which we can determine the static buckling load and the buckling mode. Subsequently, we consider the finite element formulation for vibration analysis of slender bodies to investigate the effect of axial force on the natural frequencies and modes. Finally, we introduce the finite element formulation of slender bodies subjected to a compressive follower force in which the direction of the applied force is always parallel to the body axis in the deformed configuration.
Under certain conditions, a finite element may lose its ability to deform and become excessively stiff. This phenomenon is called "element locking." In this chapter we will consider three forms of locking, including transverse shear locking, membrane locking, and incompressibility locking. Approaches for alleviating or avoiding locking will also be described.
Truss structures are built up from individual slender-body members connected at common joints. The members are connected through hinge joints which are free to rotate and thus cannot transmit moment. Individual members carry only axial tensile or compressive force. In this chapter, the truss is comprised of uniaxial elements introduced in the previous chapter. However, in order to construct the global stiffness matrix of a truss structure in 3D space, it is necessary to construct the element stiffness matrices with 3 DOF at each node, corresponding to three displacement components in the Cartesian coordinate system. After developing the finite element formulation for 3D truss structures, the effects of thermal expansion and uniaxial members subject to torsional deformation are treated.